DOCSLIB.ORG

Republic of Armenia PROJECT DOCUMENT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

United Nations Development Programme Global Environment Facility Country: Republic of Armenia PROJECT DOCUMENT Project Title: Elimination of Obsolete Pesticide Stockpiles and Addressing POPs Contaminated Sites within a Sound Chemicals Management Framework UNDAF Outcome(s): Environmental Sustainability UNDAF Outcome 4: Environment and disaster risk reduction is integrated into national and local development frameworks. Relevant CP/CPAP Outcome(s) and Indicator (s) Outcome: 4.1. Armenia is better able to address key environmental challenges including climate change and natural resource management. Output: 4.1.1. National policies and tools for implementation of and compliance with international environmental agreements are developed and adopted Implementing Partner: Ministry of Nature Protection Responsible Partners: United Nations Development Programme Brief Description The objective of the project is to protect human health and the environment globally as well as locally through elimination of POPs and obsolete pesticide stockpiles, and addressing assocaited contaminated sites within a sound chemicals management framework. The project is directed jointly by the Ministry of Nature Protection and the Ministry of Territorial Administration and Emergency Situations in partnership with the Ministry of Agriculture. It will meet this objective by eliminating a large POPs pesticide burial site that represents the major POPs stockpile and waste legacy for the country as well as residual obsolete pesticide stores at 24 locations. In total, approximately 7,100 t of POPs waste in the form of heavily contaminated soil, 1,050 t of POPs pesticides and other obsolete pesticides will be recovered, secured and ultimately treated and destroyed in an environmentally sound fashion. A further 12,700 t of less severely POPs contaminated soil will be securely contained. Additionally the project will provide critically needed hazardous waste infrastructure and national technical capability for the ongoing management of POPs and other chemical hazardous wastes as well as supporting the strengthening of institutional and regulatory capacity within an overall chemicals management framework. Page 1 of 124 Page 2 of 124 Table of contents I. Situation analysis .............................................................................................................................. 7 General country information ............................................................................................................ 7 Foreign relations ................................................................................................................................. 8 General environmental setting .......................................................................................................... 8 National legislative framework on waste and chemicals management ........................................ 10 Current Situation with respect to general POPs and waste management in Armenia .............. 16 Historical Situation respecting POPs pesticides and other obsolete pesticides in Armenia ...... 17 Current situation respecting POPs pesticides and other obsolete pesticides in Armenia .......... 21 Technical capacity analysis respecting hazardous waste and chemicals management .............. 28 II. Barriers ............................................................................................................................................ 42 III. Stakeholder analysis ....................................................................................................................... 44 IV. Linkages with ongoing projects and country drivenness ............................................................ 52 V. Strategy and project design ........................................................................................................... 54 Component 1: Capture and Containment of Obsolete Pesticide Stockpiles and Wastes ......... 61 Component 2: Obsolete Pesticide and POPs Waste Elimination ................................................ 68 Component 3: Institutional and Regulatory Capacity Strengthening for Sound Chemicals management and Contaminated Sites ........................................................................................... 70 Component 4: Project Monitoring and Evaluation ..................................................................... 73 Project Design Option and Risk Management ............................................................................. 73 Non-GEF Baseline Project ............................................................................................................. 77 VI. Incremental reasoning and benefits .............................................................................................. 81 Incremental reasoning .................................................................................................................... 81 Global Environmental Benefits ...................................................................................................... 81 National Development Benefits ...................................................................................................... 82 VII. Replicability ................................................................................................................................ 82 VIII. Management Arrangements .................................................................................................... 83 IX. Monitoring Framework and Evaluation ....................................................................................... 87 X. Legal Context .................................................................................................................................. 92 XI. Annexes ............................................................................................................................................ 94 Annex A. Project Results Framework ........................................................................................... 94 Annex B. Total Budget and Work Plan ....................................................................................... 107 Annex C. Risk analysis ................................................................................................................. 111 Annex D. Agreements and Letters of Support ........................................................................... 113 Annex E. Terms of Reference of Key Project Personnel ........................................................... 114 Annex F. UNDP Environmental and Social Screening Report ................................................. 118 Annex G. Letter of Agreement on Direct Project Services (draft at submission time) ........... 119 Annex H. GEF POPs tracking tool (attached separately at submission time in Excel) .......... 123 Page 3 of 124 List of Tables Table 1. International conventions and multilateral agreements signed, ratified and acceded to by Armenia ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 Table 2. Legal Acts and Regulatory Measures Governing Chemicals and Hazardous Waste Management .............................................................................................................................................. 10 Table 3. Inventory of obsolete pesticides recorded as being deposited in the Nubarashen burial site (data provided by AWHHE) .................................................................................................................... 20 Table 4. In-situ and excavated estimates of POPs waste and contaminated soil by Category (Courtesy Tauw/OSCE) ............................................................................................................................................. 24 Table 5. Obsolete Pesticide Storehouse Inventory and Site Screening Information ........................... 30 Table 6. Capacity assessment of state, academic and private organizations with relevant laboratory capacities on obsolete pesticides............................................................................................................... 36 Table 7. Roles and functions of principle institutional stakeholder ..................................................... 45 Table 8. Roles and functions of external (non-government) stakeholders ........................................... 50 Table 9. POPs waste volumes by prioritized category used for project design ................................... 54 Table 10. Elaborated project design framework and cost estimate by Outcome, Output and Activity .................................................................................................................................................................... 56 Table 11. Baseline project and cost estimate (Expected Expenditures during the planned 4-5 year project without GEF funding) ................................................................................................................. 78 List of Figures Figure 1. Location of the Nubarashen burial site relative to its surroundings .................................... 19 Figure 2. Overview of the Nubarashen burial site ................................................................................. 23 Figure 3. Location of the five cells and the landfill body features ........................................................ 23 Figure 4. Final configuration of
Recommended publications
  • Request for Quotation Rfq 046/17

    Request for Quotation Rfq 046/17

    REQUEST FOR QUOTATION RFQ 046/17 DATE: 17 July, 2017 NAME & ADDRESS OF FIRM REFERENCE: Supply of fruit tree seedlings for orchards in Ditavan and Baghanis villages Dear Bidder: We kindly request you to submit your quotation for “Supply of fruit tree seedlings for orchards in Ditavan and Baghanis villages” detailed in Annex 1 of this RFQ. Quotations may be submitted on or before 18:00 (local time), August 8, 2017 and via ☒ e- mail, or☒ courier mail to the address below: [email protected] or United Nations Development Programme 14 Petros Adamyan street, 0010, Yerevan Quotations submitted by email must be limited to a maximum of 5MB, virus-free and no more than 3 transmissions. They must be free from any form of virus or corrupted contents, or the quotations shall be rejected. It shall remain your responsibility to ensure that your quotation will reach the address above on or before the deadline. Quotations that are received by UNDP after the deadline indicated above, for whatever reason, shall not be considered for evaluation. If you are submitting your quotation by email, kindly ensure that they are signed and in the .pdf format, and free from any virus or corrupted files. Please take note of the following requirements and conditions pertaining to the supply of the above mentioned good/s: 1 Delivery Terms ☒ DAP Ditavan and Baghanis villages, Tavush region, Armenia [INCOTERMS 2010] Customs clearance1, if ☒ by UNDP needed, shall be done by: Exact Address of Delivery Ditavan and Baghanis villages, Tavush region, Armenia Location: Latest Expected Delivery ☒ 45 days from the issuance of the Purchase Order (PO) Delivery Schedule ☒Required Mode of Transport ☒LAND (preferred) ☒AIR Preferred ☒United States Dollars(preferred) or 2 Currency of Quotation ☒Local Currency: Armenian drams Value Added Tax on Price ☒Must be exclusive of VAT and other applicable indirect taxes 3 Quotation After-sales services required ☒ N/A.
  • Armenia by Alexander Iskandaryan

    Armenia by Alexander Iskandaryan

    Armenia by Alexander Iskandaryan Capital: Yerevan Population: 3.0 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$8,140 Source: The data above are drawn from the World Bank’sWorld Development Indicators 2014. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Electoral Process 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.50 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 Civil Society 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 Independent Media 5.50 5.50 5.75 5.75 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.75 5.75 National Democratic Governance 5.00 5.00 5.25 5.25 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 Local Democratic Governance 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 Judicial Framework and Independence 5.25 5.00 5.00 5.25 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 Corruption 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.25 5.25 5.25 Democracy Score 5.18 5.14 5.21 5.21 5.39 5.39 5.43 5.39 5.36 5.36 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
  • Local Level Risk Management M a N U

    Local Level Risk Management M a N U

    LOCAL LEVEL RISK MANAGEMENT M A N U A L Y E R E V A N 2012 1 LLRM EXECUTIVE LOCAL LEVEL RISK IMPLEMENTATION BACKGROUND 2 3 SUMMARY MANAGEMENT (LLRM) / FORMAT EXPERIENCE IN ARMENIA VULNERABILITY AND GENERAL APPROACHES AND CAPACITY 1.1 INFORMATION 2.1 3.1 PRINCIPLES APPLIED ASSESSMENT (VCA) HAZARDS RESOURCES AND THREATENING 3.2 PRACTICAL CASES TOOLS ARMENIA PROCESS A PREPARATORY PHASE DATA COLLECTION B AND RESEARCH C ANALYSIS D TOOL KIT PLANNING DRR MAINSTREAMING INTO DEVELOPMENT PLANS / DESCRIPTION AND PLANNING TOOLS IMPLEMENTATION, MONITORING AND EVALUATION DRR AND CLIMATE LLRM RISK MANAGEMENT DRR AND GENDER M A N U A L EQUITY 2 Authors: Ashot Sargsyan UNDP, DRR Adviser Armen Chilingaryan UNDP, DRR Project Coordinator Susanna Mnatsakanyan UNDP DRR Project VCA Expert Experts: Hamlet Matevosyan Rector of the Crisis Management State Academy of the Ministry of Emergency Situations Hasmik Saroyan Climate Risk Management Expert LLRM/VCA implementation Armen Arakelyan Specialist Head of “Lore” Rescue Team This manual is prepared and published with financial support from UNDP within the framework of the Project Strengthening of National Disaster Preparedness and Risk Reduction Capacities in Armenia. Empowered lives The views expressed in the publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the Resilient nations United Nations or UNDP. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This manual is a result of consolidation of collective efforts of many professionals and experts from different organizations and agencies – members of the UN extended Disaster Management Team, which worked during the years hand-to-hand to support and facilitate the strengthening of Disaster Management national system in Armenia.
  • Agricultural Value-Chains Assessment Report April 2020.Pdf

    Agricultural Value-Chains Assessment Report April 2020.Pdf

    1 2 ABOUT THE EUROPEAN UNION The Member States of the European Union have decided to link together their know-how, resources and destinies. Together, they have built a zone of stability, democracy and sustainable development whilst maintaining cultural diversity, tolerance and individual freedoms. The European Union is committed to sharing its achievements and its values with countries and peoples beyond its borders. ABOUT THE PUBLICATION: This publication was produced within the framework of the EU Green Agriculture Initiative in Armenia (EU-GAIA) project, which is funded by the European Union (EU) and the Austrian Development Cooperation (ADC), and implemented by the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Armenia. In the framework of the European Union-funded EU-GAIA project, the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) hereby agrees that the reader uses this manual solely for non-commercial purposes. Prepared by: EV Consulting CJSC © 2020 Austrian Development Agency. All rights reserved. Licensed to the European Union under conditions. Yerevan, 2020 3 CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 5 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................... 6 2. OVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT DYNAMICS OF AGRICULTURE IN ARMENIA AND GOVERNMENT PRIORITIES.....................................................................................................................................................
  • (2) Series of Laboratory Soil Tests Were Conducted in This Preparatory Survey Stage

    (2) Series of Laboratory Soil Tests Were Conducted in This Preparatory Survey Stage

    Chapter 4, FR 4-3-5 Laboratory Soil Test (1) Outline Two (2) series of laboratory soil tests were conducted in this preparatory survey stage. One was to the disturbed soil samples of sandy loam and sand-and-gravel obtained from the test-pits excavated in the reservoir bottom and surrounding area, of which locations are shown in Figure 4-3.4.1 and Figure 4-3.4.8, under the purpose of grasping the characteristics of impervious materials and sand-and-gravels and examining the possibility of the soil’s imperviousness being improved by adding and mixing bentonite or cement. The other was the ones conducted additionally to study the details about the imperviousness improvement by mixing sandy loam or sand-and-gravel with bentonite or cement. The former one shall be called “laboratory test phase-1” in this report and the latter “laboratory test phase-2”. (2) Laboratory test phase-1 (a) Tests to impervious materials (sandy loam) 1) Physical soil test and standard compaction test The test results are summarized on the Table 4-3-5.1. Table 4-3-5.1 Summary of Physical Soil Tests and Standard Compaction Test to Sandy Loam Standard Atterberg Limit (%) Grain Size Distribution (%) Compaction ) ％ Wn ( Wn s (g/cm3) ρ WL Ip Ip Silt Silt Wp Clay Sand Gravel 2~75mm 2~75mm (g/cm3) Liquid Limit <0.005 mm <0.005 mm Content (%) Plastic Limit 0.075~ 2mm 0.075~ 2mm Plastic Index 0.005~0.075mm Optimum Moisture Maximum Dry Density Dry Density Maximum Specific Gravity Moisture Content 15TP-1u 2.64 13.11 22.5 17.1 5.4 0.9 34.9 31.2 33.0 1.60 21.2 15TP-1d 2.59 19.50
  • Development Project Ideas Goris, Tegh, Gorhayk, Meghri, Vayk

    Development Project Ideas Goris, Tegh, Gorhayk, Meghri, Vayk

    Ministry of Territorial Administration and Development of the Republic of Armenia DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IDEAS GORIS, TEGH, GORHAYK, MEGHRI, VAYK, JERMUK, ZARITAP, URTSADZOR, NOYEMBERYAN, KOGHB, AYRUM, SARAPAT, AMASIA, ASHOTSK, ARPI Expert Team Varazdat Karapetyan Artyom Grigoryan Artak Dadoyan Gagik Muradyan GIZ Coordinator Armen Keshishyan September 2016 List of Acronyms MTAD Ministry of Territorial Administration and Development ATDF Armenian Territorial Development Fund GIZ German Technical Cooperation LoGoPro GIZ Local Government Programme LSG Local Self-government (bodies) (FY)MDP Five-year Municipal Development Plan PACA Participatory Assessment of Competitive Advantages RDF «Regional Development Foundation» Company LED Local economic development 2 Contents List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................ 2 Contents ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Structure of the Report .............................................................................................................. 5 Preamble ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 9 Approaches to Project Implementation ..................................................................................
  • Republic of Armenia Infrastructure and Rural Finance Support Programme Final Project Design Report Main Report

    Republic of Armenia Infrastructure and Rural Finance Support Programme Final Project Design Report Main Report

    Republic of Armenia Infrastructure and Rural Finance Support Programme Final Project Design Report Main report and annexes Document Date: May 2014 Project No. 1690 Report No: ____-AM Near East, North Africa and Europe Division Programme Management Department Republic of Armenia Infrastructure and Rural Finance Support Programme Final project design report Main report Contents Page Currency equivalents iii Abbreviations and acronyms iii Map of IFAD Operations in the Country v Map of the Programme area vi Executive Summary vii Logical Framework xiii I. STRATEGIC CONTEXT AND RATIONALE 1 A. Background 1 B. Country and Rural Development Context 2 C. Rationale 6 II. PROGRAMME DESCRIPTION 9 A. Development Objectives 9 B. Programme Components 9 C. Target Group and Programme Area 10 D. Description of Inputs and Outputs/Outcomes 12 III. PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION 17 A. Approaches 17 B. Implementation Schedule for Civil Works 20 C. Planning, M&E, Learning and Knowledge Management 23 D. Financial Management 24 E. Procurement and Governance 26 F. Supervision 28 G. Risk Identification and Mitigation 29 IV. PROGRAMME COSTS, FINANCING, BENEFITS AND SUSTAINABILITY 32 A. Estimated Programme Costs 32 B. Proposed Programme Financing 33 C. Summary Benefits and Economic Analysis 34 D. Sustainability 38 TABLES Table 1: Armenia: Reduction in the Incidence of Poverty 1998/99 to 2007 4 Table 2: Programme Costs by Component 32 Table 3: Proposed Programme Financing Sources by Type of Investment 33 Table 4: Proposed Programme Financing Sources by Component 33 Table
  • Years in Armenia

    Years in Armenia

    1O Years of Independence and Transition in Armenia National Human Development Report Armenia 2OO1 Team of Authors National Project Director Zorab Mnatsakanyan National Project Coordinator-Consultant Nune Yeghiazaryan Chapter 1 Mkrtich Zardaryan, PhD (History) Aram Harutunyan Khachatur Bezirchyan, PhD (Biology) Avetik Ishkhanyan, PhD (Geology) Boris Navasardyan Ashot Zalinyan, PhD (Economics) Sos Gimishyan Edward Ordyan, Doctor of Science (Economics) Chapter 2 Ara Karyan, PhD (Economics) Stepan Mantarlyan, PhD (Economics) Bagrat Tunyan, PhD (Economics) Narine Sahakyan, PhD (Economics) Chapter 3 Gyulnara Hovhanessyan, PhD (Economics) Anahit Sargsyan, PhD (Economics) "Spiritual Armenia" NGO, Anahit Harutunyan, PhD (Philology) Chapter 4 Viktoria Ter-Nikoghosyan, PhD (Biophysics) Aghavni Karakhanyan Economic Research Institute of the RA Ministry of Finance & Economy, Armenak Darbinyan, PhD (Economics) Nune Yeghiazaryan Hrach Galstyan, PhD (Biology) Authors of Boxes Information System of St. Echmiadzin Sergey Vardanyan, "Spiritual Armenia" NGO Gagik Gyurjyan, Head of RA Department of Preservation of Historical and Cultural Monuments Gevorg Poghosyan, Armenian Sociological Association Bagrat Sahakyan Yerevan Press Club "Logika", Independent Research Center on Business and Finance Arevik Petrosian, Aharon Mkrtchian, Public Sector Reform Commission, Working Group on Civil Service Reforms Armen Khudaverdian, Secretary of Public Sector Reform Commission "Orran" Benevolent NGO IOM/Armenia office Karine Danielian, Association "For Sustainable Human
  • Country Report on Infrastructure and Finance Armenia

    Country Report on Infrastructure and Finance Armenia

    COUNTRY REPORT ON INFRASTRUCTURE AND FINANCE ARMENIA COUNTRY REPORT ON INFRASTRUCTURE AND FINANCE ARMENIA TABLE OF CONTENT I. COUNTRY INFRASTRUCTURE AND POLICY DIRECTIONS ........................................ 2 1.1 IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS .............................................................................. 4 1.2 LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR INFRASTRUCTURE ................. 5 II. GOVERNMENT PERSPECTIVE ON THE ROLE OF PRIVATE SECTOR INVOLVEMENT ............................................................................................................... 6 2.1 RESPONSIBLE AGENCY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR INFRA-STRUCTURE PROCUREMENT ............................................................................................................... 7 2.2 LEGISLATIVE CONSTRAINTS REGARDING PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION 7 III. SOURCES OF FINANCING ............................................................................................ 9 -1- COUNTRY REPORT ON INFRASTRUCTURE AND FINANCE ARMENIA I. COUNTRY INFRASTRUCTURE AND POLICY DIRECTIONS In Armenia there is a law on State budget, which defines the annual expenditures of the state budget, including those allocated for investing in infrastructure. As for the transport sector, there is a Transport Sector Development Strategy, which has been elaborated by the assistance of the Asian Development Bank and it defines investment priorities in transport sector. The Strategy pursues improved management, infrastructure, and technology to maximize the transport sector’s performance until 2020,
  • Div. XII/Comm. 46/PG International Schools for Young Astronomers – ISYA the 32Nd ISYA, at Byurakan Observatory, Armenia, 12 Sept

    Div. XII/Comm. 46/PG International Schools for Young Astronomers – ISYA the 32Nd ISYA, at Byurakan Observatory, Armenia, 12 Sept

    Div. XII/Comm. 46/PG International Schools for Young Astronomers – ISYA The 32nd ISYA, at Byurakan Observatory, Armenia, 12 Sept. - 3 Oct. 2010 Excerpt from a report by Jean-Pierre De Greve, Chairman PG ISYA Introduction The 32nd ISYA 2010, held at Byurakan Observatory, Armenia, was characterized by a very large number of applicants (more than 100) from a large number of countries from the region. Because of the close connections between the observatory and research groups in France and Germany and the fact that for students of those countries grants were available outside the ISYA funding, it was decided also to accept a few students from these countries in order to enlarge the international character of the student body. The following organisations sponsored the ISYA programme: Armenian Astronomical Society (ArAS), Armenian National Academy of Sciences (NAS RA), Armenian State Committee for Science (SCS), Byurakan Astrophysical Observatory (BAO), German Academic Exchange Service (Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst, DAAD), International Astronomical Union (IAU), Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters (NASL), United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). The IAU allocated funds provided by the NASL to cover the travel expenses of the participants (visa, insurance, and air fare, local transport, and cultural trips). BAO, ArAS, NAS RA, SCS, and UNESCO provided accommodation for students at the observatory hotel and for lecturers in Yerevan hotels, meals and coffee breaks during the school, as well as other expenses (social events, participants’ kits, administration expenses). DAAD provided travel grants for three German students. Location The Byurakan Observatory is one of the main observational centers of the former Soviet Union and an important observatory with modern facilities in the Middle East region.
  • Armenian Monuments Awareness Project

    Armenian Monuments Awareness Project

    Armenian Monuments Awareness Project Armenian Monuments Awareness Project he Armenian Monuments Awareness Proj- ect fulfills a dream shared by a 12-person team that includes 10 local Armenians who make up our Non Governmental Organi- zation. Simply: We want to make the Ar- T menia we’ve come to love accessible to visitors and Armenian locals alike. Until AMAP began making installations of its infor- Monuments mation panels, there remained little on-site mate- rial at monuments. Limited information was typi- Awareness cally poorly displayed and most often inaccessible to visitors who spoke neither Russian nor Armenian. Bagratashen Project Over the past two years AMAP has been steadily Akhtala and aggressively upgrading the visitor experience Haghpat for local visitors as well as the growing thousands Sanahin Odzun of foreign tourists. Guests to Armenia’s popular his- Kobair toric and cultural destinations can now find large and artistically designed panels with significant information in five languages (Armenian, Russian, Gyumri Fioletovo Aghavnavank English, French, Italian). Information is also avail- Goshavank able in another six languages on laminated hand- Dilijan outs. Further, AMAP has put up color-coded direc- Sevanavank tional road signs directing drivers to the sites. Lchashen Norashen In 2009 we have produced more than 380 sources Noratuz of information, including panels, directional signs Amberd and placards at more than 40 locations nation- wide. Our Green Monuments campaign has plant- Lichk Gegard ed more than 400 trees and
  • THIRD SECTION CASE of BAYATYAN V. ARMENIA

    THIRD SECTION CASE of BAYATYAN V. ARMENIA

    THIRD SECTION CASE OF BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA (Application no. 23459/03) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 27 October 2009 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Bayatyan v. Armenia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Josep Casadevall, President, Elisabet Fura, Corneliu Bîrsan, Boštjan M. Zupan čič, Alvina Gyulumyan, Egbert Myjer, Ann Power, judges, and Stanley Naismith, Deputy Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 6 October 2009, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 23459/03) against the Republic of Armenia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Armenian national, Mr Vahan Bayatyan (“the applicant”), on 22 July 2003. 2. The applicant was represented by Mr J. M. Burns, Mr A. Carbonneau and Mr R. Khachatryan, lawyers practising in Georgetown (Canada), Patterson (USA) and Yerevan respectively. The Armenian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr G. Kostanyan, Representative of the Republic of Armenia at the European Court of Human Rights. 3. The applicant alleged that his conviction for refusal to serve in the army had unlawfully interfered with his right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. 4. By a decision of 12 December 2006, the Chamber declared the application admissible under Article 9 of the Convention and the remainder inadmissible.