DOCSLIB.ORG

Identification of Gaps and New/Modified Regulations Within the Existing Regulatory Framework

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Identification of Gaps and New/Modified Regulations Within the Existing Regulatory Framework Project no.: 314680 (Call: FP7-AAT-2012-RTD-1) ULTRA Unmanned Aerial Systems in European Airspace Thematic Priority: AAT.2012.7-25. Assessment of the potential insertion of unmanned aerial system in the air transport system Instrument: Coordination and Support Actions (CSA) D1.1 – Identification of gaps and new/modified regulations within the existing regulatory framework Due date of deliverable: 30/11/2012 Actual submission date: 21/12/2012 (version 1.0) Start date of project: 01/06/2012 Project duration: 18 months Leader organisation of this deliverable: Indra Revision status: Final Approval status Author Verification Authority Project Approval INDRA INDRA INDRA Daniel Cobo-Vuilleumier Pedro Andrés Daniel Cobo-Vuilleumier ULTRA WP1 Leader ULTRA PQC ULTRA Coordinator (TPC) 18/11/2013 (version 3.0) 19/11/2013 (version 3.0) 19/11/2013 (version 3.0) Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Seventh Framework Programme (2007-2013) Dissemination Level PU Public X PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) D1.1 – Identification of gaps and Title: new/modified regulations required within the existing regulatory framework Unmanned Aerial Systems Date: 19/11/2013 in European Airspace ULTRA-WP1-INDRA-D1.1- Document ID: REG_GAPS-PU-v3.0b Revision: Final Contributing Partners Company Name INDRA Daniel Cobo-Vuilleumier ONE Claude Le Tallec INT Gilles Fartek DFS Andreas Udovic HON Artur Zolich NLR Jan-Floris Boer Distribution List Company Name Company Name EC Pablo Pérez-Illana CRAN Gordon Dickman INDRA Daniel Cobo-Vuilleumier DFS Andreas Udovic INDRA Javier Caina DFS Jürgen Vielhauer INDRA Pedro Andrés HON Artur Zolich INDRA Antonio Barbero HON Tomas Kabrt A2Tech Jarno Puff INT Gilles Fartek AST Alfredo Roma INT Christian Scheel Struwe AST Anna Masutti NLR Jan-Floris Boer B&C Peter van Blyenburgh NLR Henk Hesselink BRTE David Esteban-Campillo ONERA Claude Le Tallec BRTE Eduardo Carrillo TAS-F Alexandra Ubeda-Farre CRAN Robert Jones TAS-F Erwan Le-Ho Document Change Log Edition Modified Revision Author Comments Date Sections / Pages 0.1 01/06/2012 Indra / Daniel Cobo-Vuilleumier All Creation of the document. 1.0 20/12/2012 Indra / Daniel Cobo-Vuilleumier All Final version of the document. Sec 1.5 Addition of last page “legal notice” as 1.1 Sec. 2.2.2.2.2 requested by the EC. (renumber 16/01/2013 Indra / Daniel Cobo-Vuilleumier Sec. 2.2.3.2.2 Sec. 2.5.3.2.5 Addition of reference to Italian draft ed as 2.0) Last page regulation on RPAS. Inclusion of EUROCONTROL feedback 3.0 18/11/2013 Indra / Daniel Cobo-Vuilleumier All and other updates. - 1 - PUBLIC This project has been carried out under a contract awarded by the European Commission No part of this report may be used, reproduced and/or disclosed in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the ULTRA project partners. © 2012 – All rights reserved D1.1 – Identification of gaps and Title: new/modified regulations required within the existing regulatory framework Unmanned Aerial Systems Date: 19/11/2013 in European Airspace ULTRA-WP1-INDRA-D1.1- Document ID: REG_GAPS-PU-v3.0b Revision: Final Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 9 1.1. Project Objectives ........................................................................................................... 9 1.2. Background ................................................................................................................... 10 1.3. Purpose of the Document ............................................................................................. 12 1.4. Document Structure ...................................................................................................... 12 1.5. References ..................................................................................................................... 12 1.6. Glossary ......................................................................................................................... 19 2. REGULATORY AND STANDARDIZATION FRAMEWORK FOR AVIATION SAFETY AND ITS APPLICATION TO (LIGHT) RPAS .................................................... 24 2.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 24 2.2. Safety in the Aviation System ...................................................................................... 25 2.2.1. Aviation Safety ........................................................................................................................... 25 2.2.1.1. The concept of Aviation Safety ................................................................................................................. 25 2.2.1.2. The Equivalent Level of Safety (ELoS) principle ...................................................................................... 26 2.2.1.3. The Aviation Safety Pillars and the Total System Approach .................................................................... 27 2.2.2. Aviation Safety Regulatory and Standardization Frameworks ..................................................... 28 2.2.2.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 28 2.2.2.2. Civil Frameworks ...................................................................................................................................... 29 2.2.2.3. Military Frameworks .................................................................................................................................. 46 2.2.3. Identification of the applicable aviation safety regulations and standards for aircraft operation ... 49 2.2.3.1. Operational Scenarios .............................................................................................................................. 49 2.2.3.2. Aircraft Categorization .............................................................................................................................. 52 2.3. Airworthiness ................................................................................................................ 58 2.3.1. Introduction................................................................................................................................. 58 2.3.1.1. The Airworthiness concept ....................................................................................................................... 58 2.3.2. Initial Airworthiness ..................................................................................................................... 59 2.3.2.1. Airworthiness Certification ........................................................................................................................ 59 2.3.2.2. Safety Assessment and Safety Objectives (“1309 issue”) ....................................................................... 71 2.3.2.3. Approval of Design and Production Organizations ................................................................................... 82 2.3.3. Continuing Airworthiness ............................................................................................................ 85 2.3.3.1. Continuing Airworthiness Organizations ................................................................................................... 85 2.3.3.2. Maintenance Personnel ............................................................................................................................ 87 2.4. Flight Crew Licensing and Training............................................................................. 88 2.4.1. Introduction................................................................................................................................. 88 - 3 - PUBLIC This project has been carried out under a contract awarded by the European Commission No part of this report may be used, reproduced and/or disclosed in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the ULTRA project partners. © 2012 – All rights reserved D1.1 – Identification of gaps and Title: new/modified regulations required within the existing regulatory framework Unmanned Aerial Systems Date: 19/11/2013 in European Airspace Document ID: ULTRA-WP1-INDRA-D1.1-REG_GAPS-PU- v3.0b Revision: Final 2.4.2. Regulatory frameworks and initiatives ........................................................................................ 88 2.4.2.1. Civil domain ...............................................................................................................................................88 2.4.2.2. Military domain ..........................................................................................................................................99 2.5. Operations, Operators, Use of Airspace and Launch & Recovery ......................... 101 2.5.1. RPAS specific types of operation.............................................................................................. 101 2.5.1.1. Very Low Level (VLL) Operations ...........................................................................................................102 2.5.1.2. RPAS operations in VFR or IFR (BVLOS above VLL) ............................................................................104
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Statistical Series 1 Finance Bulletin 1.01 Trade, Industry
    Annual Statistical Series 1 Finance Bulletin 1.01 Trade, Industry & Contracts 2014 Statistical Bulletin Series 1 provides figures on the composition and scope Statistical Release of the Department’s expenditure, information on the impact of defence spending on the wider economy, and compares the MOD’s spending to Published 14 August 2014 that of other departments and other countries. (Revised 7 November 2014) (Revised 27 November 2014) Statistical Bulletin 1.01 presents information on MOD spending with industry and commerce, and sets out the numbers, types and values of contracts placed by MOD, major equipment projects and payments made by the MOD to its suppliers. Also included, is a focus on the top ten Issued by: companies by payments, as well as contracts placed and expenditure with Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs). Industry tables provide Defence Economics details of existing PFI contracts, and analysis of the impact of MOD (Defence Expenditure Analysis), spending on equipment and services in the UK. Trade data presents Ministry of Defence, information on defence export orders and payments made for services Oak 0W, consumed by MOD establishments overseas. Abbey Wood, Bristol, Key Points and Trends BS34 8SJ. • In 2012/13, the MOD spent just under £19.4 billion with UK industry, this represents a small decrease of £260 million from the 2011/12 figure. The Responsible Statistician for this Manufacturing attracted just under half of MOD expenditure with UK publication is the Defence Expenditure industry. Analysis Head of Branch. Tel: 030 679 34531 • In 2013/14 over 41 percent of total MOD procurement expenditure was Email: DefStrat-Econ-ESES-DEA- with 10 suppliers.
    [Show full text]
  • United Kingdom Defence Statistics 2010
    UNITED KINGDOM DEFENCE STATISTICS 2010 th Published: 29 September 2010 DASA (WDS) Tel: 020-7807-8792 Ministry of Defence Fax: 020-7218-0969 Floor 3 Zone K Mil: 9621 78792 Main Building, Whitehall E-mail: [email protected] London SW1A 2HB Web site: http://www.dasa.mod.uk INTRODUCTION Welcome to the 2010 edition of UK Defence Statistics, the annual statistical compendium published by the Ministry of Defence. Changes to UK Defence Statistics (UKDS) this year include a new section on Defence Inflation and an expanded International Defence section in Chapter 1, the restructuring of the Armed Forces Personnel section in Chapter 2, and a new section on Amputations in Chapter 3. UK Defence Statistics (UKDS) is a National Statistics publication, produced according to the standards of the Official Statistics Code of Practice. However some of the tables in UKDS do not have National Statistics status – some are produced by areas outside of the scope of the Government Statistical Service; some do not yet meet all the quality standards of the Official Statistics Code of Practice; and others have not gone through the required assessment process to be classed as National Statistics. All such tables are clearly marked with explanatory notes. This year UKDS is once again being issued as a web document only, due to financial constraints within the Ministry of Defence. Each table and chapter is available in pdf format which is suitable for printing. There is also a pdf version of the entire publication, and of the UKDS factsheet. We have ceased publication of the UKDS pocket cards this year, since they are of limited value in electronic format.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment in Air Transport Infrastructure
    Guidance for developing private participation Infrastructure Transport Air Investment in Public Disclosure Authorized Investment in Air Transport Infrastructure Guidance for developing Public Disclosure Authorized private participation Mustafa Zakir Hussain, Editor With case studies prepared by Booz Allen Hamilton Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Investment in Air Transport Infrastructure Guidance for developing private participation Investment in Air Transport Infrastructure Guidance for developing private participation Mustafa Zakir Hussain, Editor With case studies prepared by Booz Allen Hamilton © 2010 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org E-mail: [email protected] All rights reserved The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Direc- tors of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorse- ment or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of appli- cable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly.
    [Show full text]
  • Noise Action Plan
    NOISE ACTION PLAN Noise Action Plan 2018-2023 NOISE ACTION PLAN 2018-2023 1 CONTENTS 1 Foreword 3 APPENDICES 2 Executive summary 4 Appendix A 28 Noise contour maps 3 Introduction 7 3.1 Purpose 7 Appendix B 31 3.2 Scope 7 Financial information 3.3 Airport description 7 3.4 Consultation 7 Appendix C 32 Schedule of consultees 4 Legal & policy framework 8 4.1 The ICAO and the ‘Balanced Approach’ 8 Appendix D 38 4.2 European Union 8 Summary of consultation responses 4.3 UK Government 8 4.4 Scottish Government 9 5 Aircraft noise & its effects 10 5.1 Introduction to aircraft noise 10 5.2 Measuring and assessing aircraft noise 10 6 Noise management at Glasgow Airport 12 6.1 Aircraft technology 12 6.2 Quieter operating procedures 12 6.3 Noise insulation and land-use planning 15 6.4 Operating restrictions 15 6.5 Working with local communities 15 7 Airspace change consultation 16 8 Results of 2017 noise mapping 18 9 Noise Action Plan 21 10 Monitoring & reporting on our progress 27 2 NOISE ACTION PLAN 2018-2023 1 FOREWORD Glasgow Airport is one of Scotland’s Operating such an important national asset comes with responsibilities, and in talking to our neighbouring communities primary infrastructure assets and and other stakeholders, I know that airport-related noise is an an integral part of the social and important issue for people. economic welfare of the West of Scotland, supporting over 7,000 Managing noise effects is an integral part of how we grow the airport responsibly in a manner which balances the positive jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Report and Accounts (Which Control Over the Financial Reporting of the Group
    resilient focused data driven ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2019 Who we are easyJet makes travel easy, enjoyable and affordable for customers, whether it is for leisure or business. We use our cost advantage and leading positions in primary airports to deliver low fares and operational efficiency, seamlessly connecting Europe with the warmest welcome in the sky. Our well-established business model provides a strong foundation to drive profitable growth and long-term shareholder returns. We are proud to have been awarded Best Low-Cost Airline in Europe at the Skytrax World Airlines Awards 2019. ‘Our Promise’ is that we will be: SAFE AND ON OUR IN IT ALWAYS FORWARD RESPONSIBLE CUSTOMERS’ TOGETHER EFFICIENT THINKING SIDE PAGE CONTENTS our value STRATEGIC REPORT 2 At a glance creation 3 Chairman’s letter 10 Highlights framework 12 Business model 14 Market review The foundation 15 Stakeholder engagement for who we are 2 16 Chief Executive’s review and what we do and Our Strategy 26 Key performance indicators 28 Financial review 35 Viability statement 36 Summary statistics 37 Risk PAGE 48 Sustainability our performance CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 66 Chairman’s statement Key highlights on corporate governance of the year’s 68 Board of Directors performance 10 72 Airline Management Board 75 Corporate governance report 96 Directors’ remuneration report 116 Directors’ report 120 Statement of Directors’ responsibilities PAGE ACCOUNTS our pLAN 121 Independent auditors’ report to the members of easyJet plc The strategic plan which 128 Consolidated accounts we announced last year 133 Notes to the accounts is now fully embedded 174 Company accounts across easyJet 176 Notes to the Company accounts 16 179 Five-year summary 180 Glossary 181 Shareholder information our commitment PAGE Sustainability is a key part of Our Promise 48 VISIT OUR WEBSITE FOR MORE INVESTOR INFORMATION corporate.easyJet.com/investors www.easyJet.com 1 AT A GLANCE our value creation framework easyJet’s value creation framework is the foundation for who we are and what we do.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2012 NATS Holdings Limited
    Annual Report and Accounts 2012 NATS Holdings Limited Company Number: 04138218 3 CONTENTS Click on the pages to the right OuR buSiNESS to access each section. you may return to the contents page at any time by clicking on the arrow located in the bottom-left corner of each page. buSiNESS AND FiNANCiAL REviEw CONSOLidated FiNANCiAL statements Company ACCOuNTS APPENDix Our Business Our business 6 Highlights 9 Chairman’s statement 10 Our Business | Annual Report and Accounts 2012 | NATS Holdings Limited 6 OuR buSiNESS and communications services. It is Our vision is to become the economically regulated and operates under licence from the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA). It operates from two air acknowledged global leader traffic control centres, at Swanwick in in innovative air traffic solutions Hampshire and Prestwick in Ayrshire. NATS (Services) Ltd and airport performance. NATS (Services) Ltd (NATS Services) is a commercial business not subject to economic regulation, and provides air traffic services at most of the UK’s major NATS Holdings Ltd (NHL) owns two airports. These range from the world’s principal operating subsidiaries and busiest dual-runway airport, Heathrow, a number of other companies which, and Gatwick, the world’s busiest single- together with NHL, form the NATS Group. runway airport, to the city airports of NATS provides air traffic control services Glasgow and Edinburgh. NATS Services for aircraft flying ‘en route’ in UK airspace also manages air traffic at airports in and the eastern part of the North Atlantic Aberdeen, Birmingham, London City, through its subsidiary NATS (En Route) Luton, Manchester and Stansted.
    [Show full text]
  • NATS Statement of Case
    Prepared by: NATS (En Route) plc NATS Protected NATS (En Route) plc CMA Statement of Case - 28 November 2019 [RP3 Reference: NERL003] NATS PROTECTED NATS (En Route) plc 2 NATS Protected Page 2 of 199 NATS (En Route) plc 3 Table of contents 1. Foreword 8 1.1. Foreword by Martin Rolfe, CEO 8 2. Introduction 11 2.1. NERL’s request for a redetermination 11 2.2. Areas of focus for the CMA’s redetermination 13 2.2.1. Setting the right opex allowance 13 2.2.2. Setting the right capex allowance 14 2.2.3. Achieving the right level of capex governance 14 2.2.4. Facilitating technology based improvements in the Oceanic service 16 2.2.5. Setting the right cost of capital 16 2.3. Overview of the areas of difference between NERL and the CAA 17 2.4. Structure of the Statement of Case 19 3. Background to RP3 and the context for the CMA’s redetermination 23 3.1. Overview 23 3.2. Our approach to RP3 23 3.2.1. Key challenges facing NERL in RP3 23 3.2.2. The impact of our experience during RP2 32 3.2.3. Our approach to developing the RP3 business plan 36 3.2.4. We consider that our RP3 business plan best serves the public interest 40 3.3. Our concerns with the CAA’s RP3 Decision 43 3.3.1. The CAA’s RP3 Decision does not achieve the right balance in the public interest 43 3.3.2. Concerns about the CAA’s evidence base 45 3.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2018
    Company Number: 04138218 NATS Holdings Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2018 nats.aero Progress Contents Strategic report Governance report Financial statements NATS Holdings Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2018 2 Progress Our business Who we are Our purpose NATS provides air traffic control (ATC) services to aircraft flying in Advancing aviation, keeping the skies safe. airspace over the UK and the eastern part of the North Atlantic, and at 13 UK airports (from April 2018). It also provides other ATC and related services to customers in the UK and overseas. Further information is Our objectives provided in the description of our business model. > Deliver a safe, efficient and reliable service every day. > Deliver SESAR1 and transform the business for the future. > Win and retain commercial business. Our values > We are safe in everything we do. > We rise to the challenge. > We work together. 1 A number of explanatory notes are provided on page 142 of this report. Abbreviations used in this report are provided on page 141. NATS Holdings Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2018 3 Progress Highlights Financial highlights Financial year ended 31 March (£m unless otherwise specified) 2018 2017 Change % Revenue 913.1 919.3 -0.7 Profit before tax and goodwill impairment 132.8 136.5 -2.7 Profit before tax 132.8 125.5 +5.8 Capital expenditure 185.6 156.4 +18.7 Net debta 71.5 132.7 -46.1 Gearingb (%) 27.5% 35.9% -23.4 Dividends 57.0 24.0 +137.5 a Excludes derivative financial instruments b Ratio of the net debt to regulatory assets of the economically regulated business (NERL) Deliver a safe, efficient and reliable Win and retain commercial business service every day > We strengthened our UK Airports business with new contracts from Belfast International, Farnborough, London City and Luton.
    [Show full text]
  • Going for Gold
    Going for Gold How golden shares can help lock in mission for social enterprises Golden Shares 2015 1 Foreword Nick O’Donohoe and Simon Rowell, Big Society Capital Mission is critical. It’s critical to any organisation, and However, it’s not just social investment that should take influences not just its activities and strategy but also its notice. Mission-locked businesses can be powerful culture. The boldest goals, like landing a man on the agents of change across Government in delivering moon, have only been achieved by consolidated effort public services, such as social care and early years’ with a clear sense of mission. education, where people need to trust that the organisations providing the services to loved ones are Increasingly, it’s not just Government, but business that doing it for the right interests. Larger companies can is embedding a sense of mission to their organisations. also differentiate themselves to employees, consumers Many new entrepreneurs are being driven by a mission and the broader public by making a real long-term to improve society, not just to make a profit. Many new commitment to helping society as well as delivering a investors are attracted to this clear sense of mission financial return. Robust and practical tools, like golden and keen to support these bold ambitions. The shares, can provide the mechanics for the building of a introduction of B Corps to the UK as a new way of more mission-driven society. helping investors identify mission-driven companies can help accelerate this trend. At Big Society Capital, our mission is to grow the social investment market.
    [Show full text]
  • The Top 500 Companies in the South
    THE TOP 500 COMPANIES IN THE SOUTH 2013 edition THE TOP 500 COMPANIES IN THE SOUTH The information for the ranking which follows is according to the latest audited accounts filed or made available by Friday 4th January. To qualify for inclusion, a company has its functioning head office or registered office at which directors are based within Berkshire, Dorset, East Sussex, Hampshire, Isle of Wight, Surrey (including Croydon, Kingston-upon-Thames, Richmond-upon- Thames, Sutton), West Sussex, Wiltshire. If a company has a number of sites in the UK, and its accounts reflect them all, then it is included only if its base within the above geographical location is considered to be its main location. Where a number of companies are part of a group which is also based in the above geographical location, and the accounts are consolidated, then the group company is the one which is included. If a number of companies are part of a group which has its head office elsewhere, then the individual companies will each be listed with their own specific figures. No existing ranking or format exists as a basis for the information which has been compiled solely by DECISION magazine. In the index, a dash or blank space in a year-on-year comparison column means that no data exists for one of the two financial years in question. THE TOP 500 COMPANIES IN THE SOUTH NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS Figures in brackets represent the previous year. 2e2 Holdings - in administration; £270m creditors due after more than a year (£257m); sale of Xayce subsidiary during course of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual Stocktaking Seminar Agenda
    Day 1 – Tuesday, 08 September 2020 Time (EDT) Session Description 08:00 – 08:45 Opening and green aviation high level keynotes The opening session will introduce the objective and dynamic of the four-day event. Moderator: - Mohamed Rahma, Director, Air Transport Bureau – International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Presenters: - Fang Liu, Secretary General – ICAO - Valérie Plante, Mayor – City of Montréal - Bertrand Piccard, Initiator & Chairman – Solar Impulse Foundation 08:45 – 09:00 Setting the scene: ICAO’s Environmental work This session will provide an introduction to ICAO’s Environmental activities, including a description of how the ICAO Stocktaking process relates to ICAO’s various work streams. Presenter: - Jane Hupe, Deputy Director, Environment – ICAO 09:00 – 09:45 Setting the scene: challenges, trends and energy requirements for aviation This session of the event will aim to present the state of knowledge on climate change based on the IPCC findings, as well as to introduce the challenges, trends, achievements and prospects related to aviation. Powering aircraft with clean energy sources could be one of the keys to decarbonise the aviation sector. An overview of the potential CO2 emissions reductions technologies will be presented, along with the energy requirements for the aviation sector and technical limitations. Presenters: - Valérie Masson-Delmotte, Co-Chair, Working Group I. – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 3 - David Lee, Professor, Atmospheric Science and Director, Centre for Aviation, Transport,
    [Show full text]
  • Highways England
    A38 Derby Junctions TR010022 Volume 6 6.3 Environmental Statement Appendices Appendix 4.1: The Planning Inspectorate Scoping Opinion Regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 April 2019 Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010027 Application Document Ref: TR010027/APP/7. A38 Derby Junctions Environmental Statement Infrastructure Planning Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 A38 Derby Junctions Development Consent Order 202[ ] 6.3 Environmental Statement Appendices Appendix 4.1: The Planning Inspectorate Scoping Opinion Regulation Number Regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Inspectorate Scheme TR010022 Reference Application Document Reference 6.3 Author A38 Project Team Version Date Status of Version 1 April 2019 DCO Application Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010022 Application Document Ref: TR010022/APP/6.3 SCOPING OPINION: Proposed A38 Derby Junctions Case Reference: TR010022 Adopted by the Planning Inspectorate (on behalf of the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government) pursuant to Regulation 10 of The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 April 2018 [This page has been intentionally left blank] ii Scoping Opinion for A38 Derby Junctions CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................
    [Show full text]