The Elections in Chile and Honduras and Regional Political Trends in 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Elections in Chile and Honduras and Regional Political Trends in 2018 ARI 13/2018 2 February 2018 The elections in Chile and Honduras and regional political trends in 2018 Carlos Malamud | Senior Analyst, Elcano Royal Institute | @CarlosMalamud Rogelio Núñez | Lecturer, IELAT, University of Alcalá de Henares Theme Chile and Honduras have kicked off an intense electoral period in Latin America that will last until 2019. These upcoming elections should confirm whether or not there is a new regional political trend (‘a turn to the centre-right’). Also present in the upcoming elections will be the trend towards re-election, the appearance of new forces and emerging leaders, along with violence and corruption as central campaign themes. Summary The election victories of Sebastián Piñera in Chile and Juan Orlando Hernández in Honduras marked the beginning of an intense electoral period in Latin America that will define the regional political map well into the next decade. The Honduran and Chilean elections have confirmed the new predominance of the political right and centre-right, while the return of Piñera to La Moneda and the forced continuity of Hernández in Honduras have reinforced the trend across the region towards presidential re-election. Chile and Honduras are also new examples of the ongoing erosion of traditional party systems, the appearance of new political forces and emerging leaders, and the corruption and violence that permeate, directly or indirectly, the electoral processes of the region. Whether or not a new political cycle can be confirmed to have begun, the region emerging from this process is much more diverse and plural than the Latin America of the past. The unanimity and hegemonies of Bolivarian ‘Chavismo’ have come to an end; the region’s actors will need to adapt to the new times, an imperative that some are still resisting. Analysis After the presidential election in Ecuador in April 2017, no further Presidents were elected in Latin America until the last two months of the year, with the elections in Chile (first round, 19 November; second round, 17 December) and Honduras (26 November). The Chilean election was marked by the fragmentation of the vote during the first round and a strong drop in support for the historic coalitions: Fuerza de Mayoría (‘Majority Force’) and Chile Vamos (‘Let’s Go Chile’) in its current version. Although in the first round of the 2013 elections these traditional coalitions gained 71% of the vote, in 2017 their support fell to 59%. The decline of such coalitions occurred as the extremes of the political spectrum attracted votes that historically had gone to centre-right and centre-left coalitions. Meanwhile, on the left there emerged the Frente Amplio (‘Broad Front’), which 1 The elections in Chile and Honduras and regional political trends in 2018 ARI 13/2018 - 2/2/2018 captured 20.2% of the vote, and on the right, the ‘independent’ José Antonio Kast appeared, taking 7.9%. In the voting Piñera (of the centre-right Chile Vamos) beat the official candidate, Alejandro Guillier (of the centre-left Fuerza de Mayoría) by far more than expected (more than nine percentage points). Guillier was penalised for his weak campaign and suffered only lukewarm support from the Frente Amplio, which remained reticent to back the old Concertacion formation. In Honduras, where elections have only one round, it took nearly a month for the official result of the presidential election of 26 November to be known. During those four weeks, the ballot counting brought back memories of other times: accusations of fraud, information blackouts, street disturbances (with 17 deaths), curfews and loss of institutional prestige. The Electoral Supreme Court (ESC) finally proclaimed Hernández –the incumbent President and the candidate of the Partido Nacional (National Party) for re-election– as the winner of the election by a narrow margin of only 1.5 percentage points (42.9% to 41.4%) over Salvador Nasralla, leader of the Alianza Opositora (‘Opposition Alliance’). The election revealed the poor functioning of Honduran judicial and electoral institutions, and their co-optation by private interests. The slowness of the vote count and the scant transparency of the ESC generated suspicions of fraud. Luis Almagro, Secretary General of the OAS pointed out that ‘it is not possible to be certain of the electoral result’, while the OAS delegation of electoral observers concluded that there were ‘irregularities before, during and after the elections’. Both electoral processes displayed characteristics linked to their country’s own internal dynamics but, at the same time, they foreshadowed certain traits that will be clearly and increasingly present during the 2018 and 2019 elections (in which 14 of the region’s 18 countries will vote). Consolidation of a new political juncture These two elections resulted in victories for the centre-right (Piñera) and the right (Hernández). The victories support the idea of a new regional political juncture. Some even speak of a ‘turn to the right’ (or to the centre-right), although this new trend can only be definitely confirmed by the results of the key elections of Mexico and Brazil. The change in trend began in 2015 with the victories of Mauricio Macri in Argentina, Jimmy Morales in Guatemala and Mesa de Unidad Democrática (MUD, ‘Table of Democratic Unity’) in the Venezuelan legislative elections. It was reinforced by the election of Pedro Pablo Kuczynski in Peru in 2016, and continued to deepen in 2017 with the return of Piñera to La Moneda and the triumph of Hernández in Honduras. Nevertheless, the ‘turn to the centre-right’ needs to be nuanced. First, for the moment at least, it remains more a temporary change of juncture than a definitive change in the political cycle. Although the victories of Macri, Kuczynski and Piñera are significant, it is still too early to raise them to the category of a regional phenomenon. Bolivarian populism has lost only in Argentina (with the defeat of Kirchnerism in 2015) and the left 2 The elections in Chile and Honduras and regional political trends in 2018 ARI 13/2018 - 2/2/2018 in Chile (the heirs in 2017 of the Concertación). Aside from these two cases, national populism retains power in Venezuela, and has been ratified in Nicaragua (Daniel Ortega) and Ecuador (Lenín Moreno). In order to speak of a new political cycle, one must wait for the election results of 2018 and 2019. The centre-left and the left have real possibilities of winning, and in key countries like Mexico (Andrés Manuel López Obrador), Brazil (Lula da Silva) and Colombia (Sergio Fajardo) they are leading in the polls. However, if the right were to win in these countries, the result would consolidate the change in trend, giving way to a new political cycle at the regional level. Furthermore, this succession of centre-right victories has been heterogenous. Macri, Kuczynski and Piñera do not represent the same things as Hernández and Morales. The inclination towards republican form, content and style among the former group contrasts sharply with the Honduran’s lack of constitutional scruples. The reasons for the ‘turn to the right’ are rooted in three factors bound up with the new political juncture: (1) the end of the primary product super-cycle in 2013 and the subsequent economic slowdown) that affected each Latin American country in varying degrees, but especially those of South America; (2) the significant deterioration of the image of some governments in the realm of public opinion, common among leaders and parties in power for long periods of time; and (3) the demands of the new middle classes that weigh heavily on the different administrations and which are characterised by their inclusion of demands befitting their status, such as more political participation, access to education and other public services (ie, security, health and transport), heightened transparency and more efficiency in the fight against corruption and violence. The re-election ‘revival’ Chile and Honduras have shown two kinds of ‘re-electionism’ and two divergent ways of applying it: in the Chilean case, respect for the constitution and national institutions, while in Honduras the limits of both have been stretched. In Chile, continuous re-election is not allowed; however, a former President can aspire to be a candidate again, but only after a full presidential term has passed. This has been occurring for more than a decade. In 2017 Piñera’s victory created the unprecedented case of two different Presidents (each from different parties) holding power for 16 consecutive years, as each one succeeded the other every four years. Honduras has also just experienced a re-election, something without precedent during the democratic period, which goes back to 1982. The precedents for presidential continuity go back many years to Tiburcio Carías Andino, who was re-elected without interruption from 1933 to 1949. However, no Honduran leader has sought re-election since the return of democracy (with the exception of the unsuccessful constitutional reform of Manuel Zelaya in 2009, along with the strategy, also unsuccessful, of Roberto Suazo Córdova in 1985 to remain in power). During the democratic period, the Constitution of 1982 (article 239) expressly prohibited the re-election of anyone who had held presidential power. 3 The elections in Chile and Honduras and regional political trends in 2018 ARI 13/2018 - 2/2/2018 In 2015 the Partido Nacional of President Hernández successfully promoted the re- election project. At the beginning of 2016, the Supreme Court –controlled by members close to the government– declared that the articles of the Constitution that prohibited presidential re-election did not apply, opening up the possibility that the president might aspire to a consecutive re-election. This re-election trend –although very different in Chile than in Honduras, in both form and content– continues to be a regional fixture.
Recommended publications
  • Worktext Audio Script Lección 1
    worktext audio script Lección 1 CONTEXTOS Ahora escucha Vas a escuchar un discurso de Soledad Práctica Morales, una activista preocupada por el medio ambiente. Antes de escuchar, marca las palabras y frases que tú crees 1 Escuchar Mientras escuchas estas oraciones, anota que ella va a usar en su discurso. Después marca las los sustantivos que se refieren a las plantas, los animales, palabras y frases que escuchaste. la tierra y el cielo. Les vengo a hablar hoy porque aunque espero que el futuro 1. Mi novio siempre me compra flores para nuestro sea color de rosa, temo que no sea así. Vivimos en esta tierra aniversario. (/) de preciosos recursos naturales: nuestros ríos, de los cuales 2. Cuando era pequeño jugaba con mi perro todo dependemos para el agua que nos da vida, el aire que el tiempo. (/) respiramos, los árboles que nos protegen, los animales, cuyas 3. En los desiertos casi no hay hierba. (/) vidas están entrelazadas con nuestras vidas. Es una lástima 4. Algunos científicos dicen que la temperatura del sol que no apreciemos lo mucho que tenemos. va a aumentar en los próximos años. (/) Es terrible que haya días con tanta contaminación del aire 5. Hoy día, en Latinoamérica hay seis especies de que nuestros ancianos se enferman y nuestros hijos no tortugas marinas en peligro de extinción. (/) pueden respirar. La tala de árboles es un problema grave… 6. Durante la tormenta, las nubes grises cubrían toda hoy día, cuando llueve, el río Cauca se llena de tierra porque la ciudad. (/) no hay árboles que aguanten la tierra.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Maya Knowledge and the Possibility of Decolonizing Education in Guatemala
    Indigenous Maya Knowledge and the Possibility of Decolonizing Education in Guatemala by Vivian Michelle Jiménez Estrada A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Sociology and Equity Studies in Education Ontario Institute for Studies in Education University of Toronto © Copyright by Vivian Michelle Jiménez Estrada 2012 Indigenous Maya Knowledge and the Possibility of Decolonizing Education in Guatemala Vivian Michelle Jiménez Estrada Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology and Equity Studies in Education University of Toronto 2012 Abstract Maya peoples in Guatemala continue to practice their Indigenous knowledge in spite of the violence experienced since the Spanish invasion in 1524. From 1991 until 1996, the state and civil society signed a series of Peace Accords that promised to better meet the needs of the Maya, Xinka, Garífuna and non-Indigenous groups living there. In this context, how does the current educational system meet the varied needs of these groups? My research investigates the philosophy and praxis of Maya Indigenous knowledge (MIK) in broadly defined educational contexts through the stories of 17 diverse Maya professional women and men involved in educational reform that currently live and work in Guatemala City. How do they reclaim and apply their ancestral knowledge daily? What possible applications of MIK can transform society? The findings reveal that MIK promotes social change and healing within and outside institutionalized educational spaces and argues that academia needs to make room for Indigenous theorizing mainly in areas of education, gender, knowledge production, and nation building. I analyze these areas from anticolonial and critical Indigenous standpoints from which gender and Indigenous identities weave through the text.
    [Show full text]
  • LA CULTURA POLÍTICA DE LA DEMOCRACIA: Guatemala, 2008 © Vanderbilt University 2008
    Guatemala Versión # 18Qrev IRB Approval: #071086 LA CULTURA POLÍTICA DE LA DEMOCRACIA: Guatemala, 2008 © Vanderbilt University 2008. Derechos reservados. All rights reserved. País: 1. México 2. Guatemala 3. El Salvador 4. Honduras 5. Nicaragua 6. Costa Rica 7. Panamá 8. Colombia 9. Ecuador 10. Bolivia 11. Perú 12. Paraguay 13. Chile 14. Uruguay 15. Brasil. 16. Venezuela PAIS 17. Argentina 21. República Dominicana 22. Haití 23. Jamaica 24.Guyana 25. Trinidad 40. Estados Unidos 2 41. Canadá IDNUM. Número de cuestionario [asignado en la oficina]__________________ IDNUM ESTRATOPRI: (201). Zona metropolitana (202). Suroccidente (203) Noroccidente (204) Suroriente (205) Nororiente ESTRATOPRI 2 UPM (Unidad primaria de Muestro).______________________ UPM Departamento :_________________________________________ PROV 2 Municipio___________________________________________________________ MUNICIPIO 2 Lugar poblado _________________________________________ GUADISTRITO SEGMENTO CENSAL_______________________________________________ GUASEGMENTO Sector___________________________________________________________ GUASEC CLUSTER. (Unidad Final de Muestreo) (Punto muestral) CLUSTER [Máximo de 8 entrevistas urbanas, 12 rurales] UR (1) Urbano (2) Rural [Usar definición censal del país] UR Tamaño del lugar: (1) Capital nacional (área metropolitana) (2) Ciudad grande TAMANO (3) Ciudad mediana (4) Ciudad pequeña (5) Área rural Idioma del cuestionario: (1) Español (2) Mam (3) K´iche´ (4) Kaqchikel IDIOMAQ (5) Q´eqchi´ (6) Achí (7) Ixil Hora de inicio: _____:_____
    [Show full text]
  • The Alliance Party and the Process of Political Integration in Malaysia
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-1974 The Alliance Party and the Process of Political Integration in Malaysia Etty Zainab Ibrahim Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Ibrahim, Etty Zainab, "The Alliance Party and the Process of Political Integration in Malaysia" (1974). Master's Theses. 2556. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/2556 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ALLIANCE PARTY AND THE PROCESS OF POLITICAL INTEGRATION IN MALAYSIA ■by Etty Zainab Ibrahim A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the Degree of Master of Arts Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan August 1974 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Throughout the preparation of the following thesis, I was privi- ledged with the suggestions, advice and encouragement of Dr. C.I. Eugene Kim. Without his ideas, there would have been no thesis, and without his faith, I would not have had the confidence to pursue the project to fruition. To him, I wish to express my deepest gratitude. I would also like to thank Dr. Jack Plano and Dr. John Gorgone who spared me their valuable time to read my work and offer some much appreciated criticisms.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reasons for the Mass Protests in Chile 2019/2020
    Institute for International Political Economy Berlin Chile Despertó – The Reasons for the Mass Protests in Chile 2019/2020 Author: Lea Sasse Working Paper, No. 166/2021 Editors: Sigrid Betzelt, Eckhard Hein (lead editor), Martina Metzger, Martina Sproll, Christina Teipen, Markus Wissen, Jennifer Pédussel Wu, Reingard Zimmer Chile Despertó – The Reasons for the Mass Protests in Chile 2019/2020 Lea Sasse Berlin School of Economics and Law Abstract: Starting on 18 October 2019, Chile experienced the largest mass protests in its history. The movement was immensely broad in its demands and diverse in tactics and participants. The citizens' discontent went beyond solely one issue, addressing a more equal welfare system and social justice, among other things. But it was not only about street protests; the social movement also caused an avalanche in social media exchanges and initiated a dialogue among Chileans in the form of neighbourhood associations. This paper argues that long-standing inequalities, the inability of politics to address them, a growing distancing of the population from politics, and the process of the citizens' politicisation were the reasons for the mass protests. Keywords: Social movements, Chile, inequality, mass protests, civil society, Latin America, social media, political opportunities, social justice JEL Codes: O54, I38, Z13, N36 Contact: Lea Sasse, Email: [email protected] Acknowledgements: I would like to thank José Magone and Hansjörg Herr for their support and helpful comments throughout the writing process of this work. Furthermore, I would like to thank my interview partners who gave me insights into the events and shared their personal experiences. Errors made in this working paper are of course mine.
    [Show full text]
  • LA NUEVA CONFIGURACIÓN DEL SISTEMA DE PARTIDOS CHILENO Y LA SITUACIÓN DEL PDC Análisis Primera Vuelta Elección Presidencial Y Parlamentaria 2017
    LA NUEVA CONFIGURACIÓN DEL SISTEMA DE PARTIDOS CHILENO Y LA Análisis primera vuelta elección SITUACIÓN DEL PDC presidencial y parlamentaria 2017 LA NUEVA CONFIGURACIÓN DEL SISTEMA DE PARTIDOS CHILENO Y LA Análisis primera vuelta elección presidencial y SITUACIÓN DEL PDC parlamentaria 2017 [3] LA NUEVA CONFIGURACIÓN DEL SISTEMA DE PARTIDOS CHILENO Y LA SITUACIÓN DEL PDC Análisis primera vuelta elección presidencial y parlamentaria 2017 Centro Democracia y Comunidad Documento elaborado por Eugenio Ortega y Francisca Martínez Diseño y diagramación: Paulina Manzur Morales Dirección CDC: Providencia 1017, piso 8. Providencia, Santiago Santiago de Chile, Diciembre 2017 Índice Introducción 7 1. Resultados Generales 9 2. Participación Electoral 11 3. Evolución de los resultados por Coaliciones 17 4. Evolución de los resultados por partido, composición de la Cámara de Diputados y Senado 23 5. Resultados del PDC a nivel agregado, por distrito y a nivel comunal 47 6. Breve descripción de la votación Presidencial por Carolina Goic y sus diferencias con la votación obtenida por Diputados y Senadores 67 7. Financiamiento de las campañas Presidencial, Parlamentaria y de CORES 73 8. Conclusiones 77 9. Anexos 81 [5] Introducción En este informe, preparado por el Centro Democracia y Comunidad, se analiza los resultados de la primera vuelta de la elección Presidencial y Parlamentaria del 19 de noviembre de 2017. A través de éste informe, se busca poner en pers- pectiva los hechos electorales más significativos e identificar algunas conclusiones generales sobre el comportamiento electoral y sus efectos en el sistema de partidos. Ésta elección, la primera realizada con el nuevo sistema electoral proporcional (moderado), ha provocado significati- vos cambios en el panorama político chileno y, particularmente, en sus sistema de partidos.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Alternative Presidential Candidates in Chile = El Auge De
    VOLUME 9, ISSUE 2 2020 81 109 DOI 23628 ISSN: 1852-9003 - eISSN: 2660-700X DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/rlop.23628 THE RISE OF ALTERNATIVE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES IN CHILE, 2009-2017 El auge de candidatos presidenciales alternativos en Chile, 2009-2017 O aumento de candidatos presidenciais alternativos no Chile, 2009-2017 Lucas PERELLÓ a and Patricio NAVIA b a The New School. New York, US. Email: [email protected]. b New York University. New York, US. Email: [email protected]. Submission: 2020-07-12 Accepted: 2020-10-07 First View: 2020-11-13 Publication: 2020-11-30 Keywords: Abstract Alternative This article explores the growing popularity of alternative presidential candi- presidential dates –those from outside the two dominant coalitions– in Chile from 2009 candidates; to 2017. Following a theoretical discussion that focuses on the causes of partisanship; voter discontent with the political establishment, we formulate four hypoth- economic vote; eses. We view support for alternative presidential candidates as a function of socio-demographic ideological detachment, declining political engagement, the economic vote, shifts; Chile and socio-demographic shifts in the electorate. We use three pre-electoral Centro de Estudios Públicos surveys to present probit models and predicted probabilities. Our findings suggest that a distinct segment of Chilean voters is behind the rise of alternative presidential candidates. Younger and more edu- cated voters who identify less with the traditional left-right ideological scale and political parties and suffer from economic anxiety –viewing the economy as performing well nationally while remaining pessimistic about their financial prospects– comprise this subgroup. Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca / CC BY-NC-ND RLOP.
    [Show full text]
  • Elections in Honduras: 2017 General Elections Frequently Asked Questions
    Elections in Honduras 2017 General Elections Frequently Asked Questions Americas International Foundation for Electoral Systems 2011 Crystal Drive | Tenth Floor | Arlington, VA 22202 | www.IFES.org November 20, 2017 Frequently Asked Questions When is Election Day and for whom are citizens voting? ............................................................................. 1 Who are the presidential candidates? .......................................................................................................... 1 Who can vote? .............................................................................................................................................. 2 How many registered voters are there? ....................................................................................................... 2 What is the structure of the government? ................................................................................................... 3 What is the election management body? What are its powers? ................................................................. 3 How many polling places will be set up on Election Day? ............................................................................ 3 What provisions are in place to promote gender equity in Honduras? ....................................................... 3 Is out-of-country voting allowed? ................................................................................................................. 4 How will voters with disabilities cast their ballots?
    [Show full text]
  • Former Chilean President Announces Reelection Bid Amid Conflict of Interest Questions Benjamin Witte-Lebhar
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository NotiSur Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) 4-7-2017 Former Chilean President Announces Reelection Bid amid Conflict of Interest Questions Benjamin Witte-Lebhar Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/notisur Recommended Citation Witte-Lebhar, Benjamin. "Former Chilean President Announces Reelection Bid amid Conflict of Interest Questions." (2017). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/notisur/14508 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in NotiSur by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LADB Article Id: 80263 ISSN: 1060-4189 Former Chilean President Announces Reelection Bid amid Conflict of Interest Questions by Benjamin Witte-Lebhar Category/Department: Chile Published: 2017-04-07 The race to replace President Michelle Bachelet when her term expires in March 2018 has kicked off in earnest now that Sebastián Piñera, her immediate predecessor and the early frontrunner in a broad field of contenders, finally made his candidacy official. The billionaire businessman and political conservative made the long-anticipated announcement March 21 in a carefully staged, confetti-covered appearance at the Natural History Museum in central Santiago’s Quinta Normal park. The event was closed to the public and the location reportedly kept secret until the last minute as a way to avoid would-be protesters. “I’m convinced that this election represents a crossroads,” Piñera (2010-2014) told a group of approximately 2,000 guests. “One option is to insist on or go farther down the wrong path that the government is on.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Revolutions : a Comparative Study of Rapid Changes in Voter Turnout
    ELECTORAL REVOLUTIONS : A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RAPID CHANGES IN VOTER TURNOUT by ALBERTO LIOY A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Political Science and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2020 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Alberto Lioy Title: Electoral Revolutions: A Comparative Study of Rapid Changes in Voter Turnout This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of Political Science by: Craig Kauffman Chairperson and Advisor Craig Parsons Core Member Erin Beck Core Member Aaron Gullickson Institutional Representative and Kate Mondloch Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School. Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded September 2020. ii © 2020 Alberto Lioy iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Alberto Lioy Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science September 2020 Title: Electoral Revolutions: A Comparative Study of Rapid Changes in Voter Turnout In the political science scholarship on democratic elections, aggregate voter turnout is assumed to be stable, and depends upon an acquired habit across the electorate. Large turnout variations in a short period of time are therefore usually attributed to negligible contextual factors. This work establishes that such variations are more frequent than commonly thought and creates a novel theoretical framework and methodological approach for systematically studying rapid changes in voter turnout across Western Europe and Latin America. I attribute dramatic changes in voters’ participation, labeled electoral revolutions, to transformations in the party system competition and institutional credibility happening inside the national political context.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenger Party List
    Appendix List of Challenger Parties Operationalization of Challenger Parties A party is considered a challenger party if in any given year it has not been a member of a central government after 1930. A party is considered a dominant party if in any given year it has been part of a central government after 1930. Only parties with ministers in cabinet are considered to be members of a central government. A party ceases to be a challenger party once it enters central government (in the election immediately preceding entry into office, it is classified as a challenger party). Participation in a national war/crisis cabinets and national unity governments (e.g., Communists in France’s provisional government) does not in itself qualify a party as a dominant party. A dominant party will continue to be considered a dominant party after merging with a challenger party, but a party will be considered a challenger party if it splits from a dominant party. Using this definition, the following parties were challenger parties in Western Europe in the period under investigation (1950–2017). The parties that became dominant parties during the period are indicated with an asterisk. Last election in dataset Country Party Party name (as abbreviation challenger party) Austria ALÖ Alternative List Austria 1983 DU The Independents—Lugner’s List 1999 FPÖ Freedom Party of Austria 1983 * Fritz The Citizens’ Forum Austria 2008 Grüne The Greens—The Green Alternative 2017 LiF Liberal Forum 2008 Martin Hans-Peter Martin’s List 2006 Nein No—Citizens’ Initiative against
    [Show full text]
  • Country Fact Sheet, Democratic Republic of the Congo
    Issue Papers, Extended Responses and Country Fact Sheets file:///C:/Documents and Settings/brendelt/Desktop/temp rir/Country Fact... Français Home Contact Us Help Search canada.gc.ca Issue Papers, Extended Responses and Country Fact Sheets Home Country Fact Sheet DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO April 2007 Disclaimer This document was prepared by the Research Directorate of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada on the basis of publicly available information, analysis and comment. All sources are cited. This document is not, and does not purport to be, either exhaustive with regard to conditions in the country surveyed or conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. For further information on current developments, please contact the Research Directorate. Table of Contents 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 2. POLITICAL BACKGROUND 3. POLITICAL PARTIES 4. ARMED GROUPS AND OTHER NON-STATE ACTORS 5. FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS ENDNOTES REFERENCES 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Official name Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) Geography The Democratic Republic of the Congo is located in Central Africa. It borders the Central African Republic and Sudan to the north; Rwanda, Burundi, Uganda and Tanzania to the east; Zambia and Angola to the south; and the Republic of the Congo to the northwest. The country has access to the 1 of 26 9/16/2013 4:16 PM Issue Papers, Extended Responses and Country Fact Sheets file:///C:/Documents and Settings/brendelt/Desktop/temp rir/Country Fact... Atlantic Ocean through the mouth of the Congo River in the west. The total area of the DRC is 2,345,410 km².
    [Show full text]