The Adequacy of Collecting Techniques for Estimating Species Richness Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Adequacy of Collecting Techniques for Estimating Species Richness Of Journal of ADVANCES IN APPLIED ECOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES Applied Ecology 2000, 37, The adequacy of collecting techniques for estimating 884±893 species richness of grassland invertebrates VALERIE STANDEN Department of Biological Sciences, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK Summary 1. There is still considerable debate about the most eective methods of sampling invertebrates in monitoring and assessment programmes. 2. The above-ground invertebrates of a limestone grassland in north-east England were compared between samples from pitfall traps and from a D-vac suction trap combined with a lightweight swish net (SW/DV). 3. Over 14 000 individuals were captured, with similar numbers in the pitfall and SW/DV samples. A total of 480 species of Hemiptera, Coleoptera, Diptera and Araneae was identi®ed and placed into 14 taxa for further analysis. 4. The pitfall sample produced species/specimen curves from which it was possible to estimate species richness for all the Coleoptera and Araneae taxa and the calyp- terate Schizophora. The SW/DV sample was adequate to estimate the species rich- ness of Hemiptera, most Diptera taxa, herbivorous Coleoptera and Linyphiidae. 5. The proportion of Coleoptera and Araneae taxa that were method-unique was higher in the pitfall sample than the SW/DV sample and vice versa for the Hemi- ptera and Diptera taxa. Nevertheless, a relatively high proportion of method- unique species of most taxa was found in both sample types, indicating that they can each contribute to assessing species assemblages in grasslands. 6. Both pitfall traps and SW/DV samples are needed to estimate species richness in grasslands for all taxa except Heteroptera, Homoptera and Lycosidae. Herbivorous Coleoptera and Linyphiidae were collected in numbers adequate for assessing rich- ness in both sample types, but more specimens were required in one or other sam- ple for the remaining taxa. Key-words: D-vac technique, monitoring, pitfall traps, rarefaction, sampling, swish net. Journal of Applied Ecology (2000) 37, 884±893 Introduction group. Pitfall traps catch more specimens of the lar- ger carabid species and under-represent smaller spe- A comprehensive comparison of invertebrate taxa, cies (Spence & Niemela 1994; Ulber & Wolf- collecting techniques, vegetation morphs and habi- Schwerin 1995); they also catch more spider males tats does not exist, although comparisons between than females and more species of Erigoninae and some variables have been made. For example, Lycosidae than other spider families (Dinter 1995). Kromp et al. (1995) estimated the density of arthro- Pitfall traps captured a dierent suite of Hemiptera pod groups using emergence traps, pitfall traps and species compared with sweep netting (Cherrill & a ¯ooding method, and found that the size and Sanderson 1994; Danahar 1998). mobility of taxa in¯uenced estimates of density. Although less structurally diverse than some habi- More frequent are comparisons of dierent collect- tats, grasslands present their own problems for sam- ing methods used to sample a single taxonomic pling invertebrates. Lu (1966) demonstrated signi®cant dierences between the beetle fauna inha- # 2000 British Correspondence: Valerie Standen (e-mail valerie.stan- biting tussocks and the intervening ground. Spiders Ecological Society [email protected]). tend to be either active hunters over the surface of 885 the ground or web-builders inhabiting dierent were to establish (i) which collecting method(s) V. Standen parts of plants, and so require speci®c sampling allowed an estimate of species richness of 14 methods (Cherrett 1964). Finally, Denno (1994) Coleoptera, Diptera, Hemiptera and Araneae taxa, demonstrated the in¯uence of grassland structure on and (ii) the extent of species overlap between sam- the density and diversity of leafhoppers. pling methods and consequently whether one or The herb-rich grasslands that have developed over more methods are needed to estimate species rich- outcrops of magnesian limestone in south and east ness of each taxon in the grassland habitat. County Durham, UK, have mostly been destroyed by agricultural intensi®cation and the habitat is now nationally scarce. Thrislington, the location of this Methods study, has been considered an important area for plants and invertebrates since the 19th century. By S I T E D E S C R I P T I O N the middle of the 20th century it supported the most extensive stand of primary magnesian limestone Thrislington grassland in east County Durham (NZ grassland in Britain and 10 ha were designated as a 318 228) is 110 m a.s.l. with an annual rainfall of site of special scienti®c interest in 1984. In the early approximately 500 mm. The calcareous plant com- 1970s, an extension to the adjacent dolomite quarry munity that has developed over thin soils derived threatened to destroy the site entirely but, as a result from the magnesian limestone escarpment contains of public concern, part was left undisturbed and 5Á5 species found in northern arctic±alpine grasslands ha of ancient grassland was translocated as intact and in chalk grasslands of southern England. Blue turves to an adjacent, previously quarried, area moor grass Sesleria albicans Kit. ex Schult. and (Park 1989). Translocation took place over 8 years small scabious Scabiosa columbaria L. characterize beginning in 1982, and following completion the site the site, with over 140 vascular species recorded in was designated as a National Nature Reserve. total. A large number of nationally or locally scarce An extensive programme of monitoring plants invertebrates are associated with the grasslands, and invertebrates was initiated at Thrislington in including the Northern Argus butter¯y Aricia artax- 1982. Monitoring an invertebrate community can erxes spp. salmacis Stephens 1831 and the glow reveal how it changes over time. Once the species worm Lampyris noctiluca L. composition is known, it may be possible to target rare species or those that play a key functional role in the maintenance of the community, and design a S A M P L I N G P R O G R A M M E sampling programme to monitor changes in their Two adjacent sites approximately 5 ha in area were abundance. However, in the initial stages the feature sampled, one of which was to be translocated in most often used to assess change is species richness. 1983. The ®rst sample was taken in May 1982, then It is therefore necessary to employ a sampling each following month up to and including Septem- regime which ensures that less abundant species, or ber 1982, using three collecting techniques. The sam- those not easily captured, are recorded because they pling programme was repeated at both sites in 1985 may be the species that are most aected by distur- and 1988, giving a total of 15 months of data for bance. each. Macroinvertebrates were counted and identi- Where the aim is to monitor all the invertebrates, ®ed by specialist taxonomists, except for (i) Isopoda several collecting techniques must be used as no sin- (Philoscia muscorum (Scopoli) and Armadillidium gle method will capture animals from all microhabi- vulgare (Latreille)), which were ubiquitous and tats. The methods chosen for this work were pitfall super-abundant and of little value therefore in traps, a D-vac suction apparatus and a swish net detecting change, and (ii) Mollusca and Lepidop- designed to capture the most active and easily dis- tera, as none of the methods employed was suitable turbed invertebrates. The samples dier in two for these groups. important respects. First, they represent dierent parts of the total fauna, pitfall traps collecting mostly epigeal fauna, and swish net and D-vac C O L L E C T I N G T E C H N I Q U E S mostly epiphytic fauna. Secondly, the patterns of accretion of individuals and species will vary Pitfall traps because pitfall traps depend on the animals' activity and collect continuously from an unknown area, Nine plastic cups, 8 cm in diameter, were set without whereas the suction apparatus and swish net collect covers 2 m apart in a 3 Â 3 grid in each site. Ethy- from a known area for brief periods. lene glycol of 80% was used as preservative and the # 2000 British The aim of monitoring invertebrates in this pro- traps were set continuously and emptied monthly Ecological Society gramme was to assess changes in species composi- throughout May to the end of September in each Journal of Applied Ecology, 37, tion and richness over a number of years following year of study. No attempt was made to compensate 884±893 grassland translocation. The objectives of this paper for loss, which was approximately 10%. 886 Swish samples families. However, several groups were not identi®ed Monitoring to species owing to lack of taxonomic expertise and The swish samples were designed to collect insects grassland these were excluded: Sciarinea (Nematocera), 130 ¯ying over the sward and visiting the tallest in¯ores- invertebrates specimens; Phoridae (Brachycera), 50 specimens; cences. These often escape the standard sweep-net and Anthomyiinae (acalypterate Schizophora), 400 technique, which is designed to collect amongst the specimens. The Araneae were grouped as Linyphii- grass sward and canopy. The aluminium frame was dae, Lycosidae and `other spider' families. The 0Á4 m in width on a 1Á5-m handle and was swept families included in the non-familial groupings are only over the topmost part of the sward. One sam- listed in Table 1. ple unit was 20 strokes of 0Á75 m width taken at 0Á75-m intervals so that the area swept was 6 m2 per sample within approximately 10 m2. Five sample R A R E F A C T I O N A N D C O L L E C T O R C U R V E S units were collected, giving an area of approximately Although species abundance models such as rarefac- 30 m2 sampled each month.
Recommended publications
  • STUDIES CONCERNING SPERM TRANSFER in SOME HIGHER DIPTERA a Thesis Submitted by J.N. POLLOCK, B.Sc., M.Sc., D.I.C., Cert. Ed., Fo
    STUDIES CONCERNING SPERM TRANSFER IN SOME HIGHER DIPTERA A thesis submitted by J.N. POLLOCK, B.Sc., M.Sc., D.I.C., Cert. Ed., for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of London Imperial College Field Station, Silwood Park, Sunninghill, ASCOT, Berkshire. July 1971. CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 3 SECTION 1. The cumulative mating frequency curve in Lucilia sericata 14 SECTION 2a. The alignment of parts during copulation and the function- 41 al morphology of the phallosome, in Lucilia sericata Meigen (Calliphoridae). 41 SECTION 2b. Lateral phallosome ducts in some Calliphorinae, other than Lucilia sericata. 64 SECTION 3. Test for the mated status of male Lucilia sericata. 71 SECTION 4. Tests on tepa-treated males of Lucilia sericata. 81 SECTION 5. Investigations into the nature, fate and function of the male accessory gland secretion in Lucilia sericata. .00 98 SECTION 6. The phallosome of Sarcophaginae. 116 SECTION 7. Studies on the mating of Glossina Weidermann. 129 SECTION 8. Phallosome structure in the male, and the co-adapted spermathecal ducts of the female, in Merodon equestris (F.) (Syrphidae). 154 SECTION 9. The evolution of sperm transfer mechanisms in the Diptera. 166 APPENDIX 1. A probabilistic approach to the cumulative mating frequency curve. 175 APPENDIX 2. Mating frequency data. 180 APPENDIX 3. The taxonomic position of Glossina. 193 APPENDIX 4. Spermatophores in Bibionidae. 199 SUMMARY 204 REFERENCES 208 1 ABSTRACT A review of the pest status of the flies studied is followed by an appraisal of basic research into the mating behaviour and physiology of higher flies, especially Calliphoridae.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Aschiza)
    Insect Systematics & Evolution 45 (2014) 395–414 brill.com/ise Homology of the metapleuron of Cyclorrhapha, with discussion of the paraphyly of Syrphoidea (Diptera: Aschiza) Takuji Tachi* Biosystematics Laboratory, Kyushu University, Motooka, Fukuoka City 819-0395, Japan *E-mail:[email protected] Published online 20 March 2014; published in print 20 October 2014 Abstract The morphology of the metathorax of brachyceran Diptera is examined, particularly the metapleuron in the superfamily Syrphoidea comprising two families Syrphidae and Pipunculidae. The homologies of the metepisternum (EPS) and metepimeron (EPM) are redefined based on the metapleural suture (PlS), which bears an internal apophysis. A new interpretation of the metathorax is provided for Syrphidae. Members of Schizophora and Pipunculidae have an articulation between EPM and the first abdominal tergite in common and the (metapleural-abdominal) articulation is indicated as a synapomorphy for them. In some species of Syrphidae the well-developed metapostnotum is articulated with the first abdom- inal tergite and the (metapostnotal-abdominal) articulation is diagnostic of a subgroup of the family. The articulations are evaluated and discussed with respect to abdominal flexion of Diptera. Keywords abdominal flexion; articulation structure; metapleural suture (PlS); metepimeral pleura (EPM); metepis- ternal pleura (EPS); Schizophora Introduction The Diptera have their hindwings reduced to small club-like organs, whereas their forewings are developed as functional flight organs. The halteres are considered the most important autapomorphy of the Diptera, which are indeed named for having only two fully developed wings. The halteres play an important role as gyroscopic organs of equilibrium and moves antiphasically to the forewing during flight (Fraenkel & Pringle 1938; Schneider 1953; Chan et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Diptera, Phoridae
    Zootaxa 593: 1–11 (2004) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 593 Copyright © 2004 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA phylogeny of critical genera of Phoridae (Diptera) and related families of Aschiza CHARLES E. COOK1 , JEREMY J. AUSTIN2 & R. HENRY L. DISNEY1,3 1 Department and Museum of Zoology, University of Cambridge, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, ENGLAND. Email: [email protected] 2 The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, ENGLAND. (Current address: Sciences Department, Museum Victoria, GPO Box 666E, Melbourne VIC 3001, Australia. Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] Abstract Phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA gene sequences supports the monophyly of the Phoridae. Within this family the Phorinae clade includes two aberrant termitophilous subfam- ilies, the Thaumatoxeninae and the Termitoxeniinae, which cluster with Dohrniphora and Diplonevra. These two genera include termitophiles and parasitoids of termites, so we hypothesize that these termitophilous phorids are a monophyletic group. While the data neither refute nor sup- port the assumed monophyly of the Metopininae, the genera of this subfamily were not monophyl- etic in our analysis, but fell into two subclades that correspond with the tribes Metopinini and Gymnophorini. Key words: Diptera, Aschiza, Phoridae, rRNA sequences, phylogeny, maximum likelihood, Baye- sian phylogeny, mitochondria, mtDNA, 12S, 16S lsuRNA, ssuRNA Introduction The flies, midges, and gnats (Diptera) are a successful and widespread insect order that includes over 120 named families and over 140,000 named species. However, the majority of species still remain undescribed and unnamed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Status of the Lonchopteridae, Platypezidae and Opetiidae Flies of Great Britain
    Natural England Commissioned Report NECR246 A review of the status of the Lonchopteridae, Platypezidae and Opetiidae flies of Great Britain Species Status No. 34 First published 29th January 2018 www.gov.uk/natural -england Foreword Natural England commission a range of reports from external contractors to provide evidence and advice to assist us in delivering our duties. The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. Background Making good decisions to conserve species This report should be cited as: should primarily be based upon an objective process of determining the degree of threat to CHANDLER, P.J. 2017. A review of the status the survival of a species. The recognised of the Lonchopteridae, Platypezidae and international approach to undertaking this is by Opetiidae flies of Great Britain Natural England assigning the species to one of the IUCN threat Commissioned Reports, Number246. categories. This report was commissioned to update part of the 1991 review of the scarce and threatened flies of Great Britain Part 2: Nematocera and Aschiza not dealt with by Falk, edited by Falk and Chandler. This original volume included a range of families, but rather than repeat the rather large and arbitrary grouping, the Lonchopteridae, Platypezidae and Opetiidae flies were abstracted into the current review volume. Many of the remaining families will form subsequent volumes in their own right. Natural England Project Manager - David Heaver, Senior Invertebrate Specialist [email protected] Contractor - Peter Chandler Keywords - Lonchopteridae, Platypezidae, Opetiidae files, invertebrates, red list, IUCN, status reviews, IUCN threat categories, GB rarity status Further information This report can be downloaded from the Natural England Access to Evidence Catalogue: http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/ .
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera, Phoridae, Sciadoceridae, Aschiza, Systematic Position
    MUSEUM AND INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES FRAGMENTA FAUNISTICA Fragm. faun. Warszawa, 30.12.2001 44 309-317 R. H en ry L. DISNEY Sciadoceridae (D iptera) reconsidered Abstract: TONNOIR's (1926) assignment of Sciadocera rufomaculata W h ite to the Phoridae is supported and SCHMITZ's (1929) transfer of it and Archiphora patagonica SCHMITZ to a sep arate fam ily, Sciadoceridae, is rejected. The growing number of fossils bridging the gap between Sciadoceridae a n d Phoridae support the view that the sciadocerids are merely an assortment of Phoridae that share some plesiomorphic features. Key words: Diptera, Phoridae, Sciadoceridae, Aschiza, systematic position Author's address: University Department of Zoology, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, U. K. e-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION Y eates and WiEGMANN (1999)have provided a useful review of the higher-level phylogeny of Diptera. An area of continuing debate relates to the Aschiza (“Lower Cyclorrhapha" of these authors), especially the familes other than the Syrphoidea. Per­ haps the most intriguing flies in this assemblage are two present-day genera, and sev­ eral fossil genera, currently assigned to the family Sciadoceridae. The present paper reconsiders these genera. W HITE (1917) described Sciadocera rufomaculata (Fig. 1) from Tasmania and assigned it to the Empidae (Empididae), Hybotinae (Hybotidae). However, he commented that “the correct position of this curious genus is somewhat doubtful". TONNOIR (1923) agreed and transferred it to the Platypezidae, but noting that the wing venation (Fig. 14) is transitional between this family and the Phoridae. He subsequently reassigned it to the Phoridae, Sciadocerinae (TONN OIR 1926) .
    [Show full text]
  • MCM8 Msh4 Msh5 MEI-217 MEI-218 MCM9 Figure S1. Occurrence Of
    Figure S1 Hartmann et al. Msh4 Msh5MCM8 MCM9 MEI-217 MEI-218 Ephydroidea Tephritoidea Acalyptratae Diopsoidea Schizophora Muscoidea Oestroidea Calyptratae Hippoboscoidea Platypezoidea Brachycera Aschiza Syrphoidea Asiloidea Culicoidea Anoph. Culicomorpha Chironomoidea Psychodomorpha Nematocera Bibionomorpha Tipulomorpha Figure S1. Occurrence of Msh4, Msh5, MCM8, MCM9, MEI-217, and MEI-218 in Diptera. The dendrogram on the left illustrates relationships among Dipteran taxa for which sufficient genome or transcriptome sequence is available to determine with reasonable confidence the presence or absence of genes encoding proteins relevant to this work. Circles to the right indicate presence (filled) or absence (open) of each gene/protein. For the suborder Brachycera, major superfamilies within Schizophora and the sister taxon Aschiza are shown, as well as the superfamily Asiloidea. For the suborder Nematocera, only infraorders are shown, except for Culicomorpha, where both superfamiles are indicated. Within the superfamily Culicoidea (mosquitoes), MEI-217 and MEI-218 are found in Culex and Aedes but are missing from all of the 20 Anopheles species whose genomes are sequenced. It is hypothesized that the mei-MCM complex functionally replaces Msh 4/5 in Drosophila (Kohl, Jones, and Sekelsky 2012). We do not find orthologs of Msh4, Msh5, or Mcm9 in species in the Dipteran sub-order Brachycera, suggesting that the structure and function of the Drosophila mei-MCM complex may have its origins in the ancestral founder of this lineage. Interestingly, Asiloidea appear to have retained an ortholog of MCM9. It may be informative to examine these species more thoroughly when additional sequences become available. Figure S2 Hartmann et al. A Ephydroidea D.
    [Show full text]
  • Flies of Illinois
    )OLHVRI,OOLQRLV86$ $QJHOOD0RRUHKRXVH,OOLQRLV1DWXUH3UHVHUYHV&RPPLVVLRQ 3KRWRV$QJHOOD0RRUHKRXVH DQJHOODPRRUHKRXVH#LOOLQRLVJRY 3URGXFHG$QJHOOD0RRUHKRXVHDQG$OLFLD'LD])LHOG0XVHXP,GHQWLILFDWLRQDVVLVWDQFHSURYLGHG -RKQ$VFKHU-RKQDQG-DQH%DODEDQ.HOVH\-53%\HUV 5RE&DQQLQJV-RKQ)&DUU&KULV&RKHQ%HQ&RXOWHU(YHQ'DQNRZLF]%LOO'HDQ0DUWLQ+DXVHU5RVV+LOO -RKQ.O\PNR6SHQFHU3RWH+HUVKHO5DQH\$UWXUR6DQWRV.DWMD6FKXO]$DURQ6FKXVWHII/LDP:ROIIand .HQ:ROJHPXWK (bugguide.net; inaturalist.org) Please note: (—) = Unknown species and genus due to photographic limitations, * = Name of subfamily. )LHOG0XVHXP &&%<1&/LFHQVHGZRUNVDUHIUHHWRXVHVKDUHUHPL[ZLWKDWWULEXWLRQEXWGRHVQRWSHUPLWFRPPHUFLDOXVHRIWKHRULJLQDOZRUN 1HPDWRFHUD&UDQH)OLHV0LGJHV0RVTXLWRHVDQG%ODFN)OLHV >ILHOGJXLGHVILHOGPXVHXPRUJ@>@ versiRn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
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Sphaeroceridae
    Bibliography 327 Bibliography of Sphaeroceridae Aartsen, B. van, Beuk, P. L. T. & Prijs, H. J. 1991. Diptera. In: Koomen, P. (ed.): Verslag van de 145e zomervergadering van de Nederlandse Entomologische Vereniging 8-10 juni te Buurse. Entomologische Berichten, Amsterdam 51(3): ix-x (in Dutch). Abraham, R. & Joswig, W. 1985. Die Parasitierung von Fliegenpuparien aus toten Schnecken durch Spalangia erythromera (Hym., Pteromalidae) und Basalys semele (Hym., Diapriidae). Spixiana 8: 285-287. Adams, C. F. 1903. Diptera of Kansas. Descriptions of six new species. The Kansas University Science Bulletin 2(5): 221-223. Adams, C. F. 1904. Notes and descriptions of North American Diptera. The Kansas University Science Bulletin 2(14): 433-455. Adams, C. F. 1905. Diptera Africana, I. The Kansas University Science Bulletin 3(6): 149-208. Aldrich, J. M. 1897. A collection of Diptera from Indiana caves. Annual Report of the Indiana Department of Geology and Natural Resources 21(1896): 186-190. Aldrich, J. M. 1905. A catalogue of North American Diptera (or two-winged flies). Smithsonian Institution, Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collection 46 (1444): 1-680. Aldrich, J. M. 1933. Notes on Diptera. No. 6. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 35: 165-170. Allen, A. A. 1977. Sphaerocera scabricula Hal. (Diptera, Sphaeroceridae) recaptured near London. The Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 112: 242. Andersson, H. 1967. Faunistic, ecological and taxonomic notes on Icelandic Diptera. Opuscula Entomologica 32: 101-120. Antiga, P. 1888. Contribución a la fauna de Cataluña. Catálogo de los Dípteros observados en diferentes sitios del Principado. 16 pp., Imprenta de Viuda e Hijos de J. Subirana, Barce- lona.
    [Show full text]
  • Episodic Radiations in the Fly Tree of Life
    Episodic radiations in the fly tree of life Brian M. Wiegmanna,1, Michelle D. Trautweina, Isaac S. Winklera, Norman B. Barra,b, Jung-Wook Kima, Christine Lambkinc,d, Matthew A. Bertonea, Brian K. Cassela, Keith M. Baylessa, Alysha M. Heimberge, Benjamin M. Wheelerf, Kevin J. Petersone, Thomas Papeg, Bradley J. Sinclairh, Jeffrey H. Skevingtoni, Vladimir Blagoderovj, Jason Caravask, Sujatha Narayanan Kuttyl, Urs Schmidt-Ottm, Gail E. Kampmeiern, F. Christian Thompsono, David A. Grimaldip, Andrew T. Beckenbachq, Gregory W. Courtneyr, Markus Friedrichk, Rudolf Meierl,s, and David K. Yeatesd Departments of aEntomology and fComputer Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695; bCenter for Plant Health Science and Technology, Mission Laboratory, US Department of Agriculture-Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Moore Air Base, Edinburg, TX 78541; cQueensland Museum, South Bank, Brisbane, Queensland 4101, Australia; eDepartment of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755; gNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark; hCanadian National Collection of Insects, Ottawa Plant Laboratory-Entomology, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1A 0C6; iInvertebrate Biodiversity, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1A 0C6; jDepartment of Entomology, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom; kDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202; lDepartment of Biological Sciences and sUniversity Scholars Programme,
    [Show full text]
  • Fly Times Issue 53, October 2014
    FLY TIMES ISSUE 53, October, 2014 Stephen D. Gaimari, editor Plant Pest Diagnostics Branch California Department of Food & Agriculture 3294 Meadowview Road Sacramento, California 95832, USA Tel: (916) 262-1131 FAX: (916) 262-1190 Email: [email protected] Welcome to the latest issue of Fly Times! As usual, I thank everyone for sending in such interesting articles! I hope you all enjoy reading it as much as I enjoyed putting it together! Please let me encourage all of you to consider contributing articles that may be of interest to the Diptera community for the next issue. Fly Times offers a great forum to report on your research activities and to make requests for taxa being studied, as well as to report interesting observations about flies, to discuss new and improved methods, to advertise opportunities for dipterists, to report on or announce meetings relevant to the community, etc., with all the associated digital images you wish to provide. This is also a great place to report on your interesting (and hopefully fruitful) collecting activities! Really anything fly-related is considered. And of course, thanks very much to Chris Borkent for again assembling the list of Diptera citations since the last Fly Times! The electronic version of the Fly Times continues to be hosted on the North American Dipterists Society website at http://www.nadsdiptera.org/News/FlyTimes/Flyhome.htm. For this issue, I want to again thank all the contributors for sending me so many great articles! Feel free to share your opinions or provide ideas on how to improve the newsletter.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Immature Stages of British Flies
    Royal Entomological Society HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS To purchase current handbooks and to download out-of-print parts visit: http://www.royensoc.co.uk/publications/index.htm This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Copyright © Royal Entomological Society 2013 Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects Vol. 10, Part 14 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE IMMATURE STAGES OF BRITISH FLIES DIPTERA LARVAE, WITH NOTES ON EGGS, PUP ARIA AND PUPAE K. G. V. Smith ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON Handbooks for the Vol. 10, Part 14 Identification of British Insects Editors: W. R. Dolling & R. R. Askew AN INTRODUCTION TO THE IMMATURE STAGES OF BRITISH FLIES DIPTERA LARVAE, WITH NOTES ON EGGS, PUPARIA AND PUPAE By K. G. V. SMITH Department of Entomology British Museum (Natural History) London SW7 5BD 1989 ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON The aim of the Handbooks is to provide illustrated identification keys to the insects of Britain, together with concise morphological, biological and distributional information. Each handbook should serve both as an introduction to a particular group of insects and as an identification manual. Details of handbooks currently available can be obtained from Publications Sales, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD. Cover illustration: egg of Muscidae; larva (lateral) of Lonchaea (Lonchaeidae); floating puparium of Elgiva rufa (Panzer) (Sciomyzidae). To Vera, my wife, with thanks for sharing my interest in insects World List abbreviation: Handbk /dent. Br./nsects. © Royal Entomological Society of London, 1989 First published 1989 by the British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy of Black Scavenger Flies (Diptera: Sepsidae) from Luzon, Philippines
    ARTICLE Taxonomy of black scavenger flies (Diptera: Sepsidae) from Luzon, Philippines Socrates D. Letana Institute of Biology, College of Science, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City 1101, Philippines ourteen species of black scavenger flies in four gene- (Ozerov 2005, Ozerov 2010, Iwasa 2008, Iwasa et al. 2008, Ang ra are treated taxonomically in this paper. Five spe- and Meier 2010). This discovery is largely from the Afrotropical cies belonging to the subfamily Sepsinae are record- region, also with the highest generic endemicity, with some rep- ed for the first time in the Philippines, namely: Sep- resentatives in the Neotropics, Oriental and Australasian regions. sis sepsi Ozerov, Dicranosepsis dudai Ozerov, Di- There are about 78 species and two endemic genera from the Fcranosepsis transita Ozerov, Dicranosepsis sauteri Ozerov, and Oriental region (5.4% generic endemism) (Ozerov 2005). Iwasa Dicranosepsis pseudotibialis Ozerov. A new Philippine island mainly contributed to the discovery and description of the Asian distribution record of Australosepsis niveipennis (Becker) is also and Oriental species (Iwasa 1980, Iwasa 1981, Iwasa 1982, noted. Taxonomic keys for the genera and species are presented. Iwasa 1984a, Iwasa 1984b, Iwasa 1985, Iwasa 1986, Iwasa 1995, Iwasa 1999, Iwasa 2001, Iwasa 2007, Iwasa 2008). INTRODUCTION The taxonomic literature and knowledge regarding the Phil- In the most recent world catalogue of Sepsidae (Ozerov ippine black scavenger flies are very limited. The early works of 2005), there are about 37 genera with 312 described species of Duda (1926a,b) and Zuska (1977b) included Philippine materi- black scavenger flies worldwide. Twelve genera are distributed als. Later, Baltazar’s inventory of Philippine insects (Baltazar in the Oriental region and six of these are from the Philippines.
    [Show full text]