STUDIES CONCERNING SPERM TRANSFER in SOME HIGHER DIPTERA a Thesis Submitted by J.N. POLLOCK, B.Sc., M.Sc., D.I.C., Cert. Ed., Fo
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
André Nel Sixtieth Anniversary Festschrift
Palaeoentomology 002 (6): 534–555 ISSN 2624-2826 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/pe/ PALAEOENTOMOLOGY PE Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press Editorial ISSN 2624-2834 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.2.6.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:25D35BD3-0C86-4BD6-B350-C98CA499A9B4 André Nel sixtieth anniversary Festschrift DANY AZAR1, 2, ROMAIN GARROUSTE3 & ANTONIO ARILLO4 1Lebanese University, Faculty of Sciences II, Department of Natural Sciences, P.O. Box: 26110217, Fanar, Matn, Lebanon. Email: [email protected] 2State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China. 3Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité, ISYEB-UMR 7205-CNRS, MNHN, UPMC, EPHE, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 50, Entomologie, F-75005, Paris, France. 4Departamento de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Evolución, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain. FIGURE 1. Portrait of André Nel. During the last “International Congress on Fossil Insects, mainly by our esteemed Russian colleagues, and where Arthropods and Amber” held this year in the Dominican several of our members in the IPS contributed in edited volumes honoring some of our great scientists. Republic, we unanimously agreed—in the International This issue is a Festschrift to celebrate the 60th Palaeoentomological Society (IPS)—to honor our great birthday of Professor André Nel (from the ‘Muséum colleagues who have given us and the science (and still) national d’Histoire naturelle’, Paris) and constitutes significant knowledge on the evolution of fossil insects a tribute to him for his great ongoing, prolific and his and terrestrial arthropods over the years. -
Sarcophagidae
Cornell University Insect Collection SARCOPHAGIDAE Determined Species: 215 Emily Satinsky Updated: August 13, 2014 Subfamily Tribe Genus Species Author Zoogeography Miltogramminae Miltogrammini Amobia aurifrons (Townsend 1891) NEA distorta (Allen 1926) NEA erythrura (Wulp 1890) NEA floridensis (Townsend 1892) NEA oculata (Zetterstedt 1844) NEA spp. NEA Euaraba tergata (Coquillett 1895) NEA Eumacronychia agnella (Reinhard 1939) NEA montana Allen 1926 NEA spp. NEA Gymnoprosopa argentifrons Townsend 1892 NEA filipalpus Allen 1926 NEA milanoensis Reinhard 1945 NEA Hilarella hilarella Zetterstedt 1844 NEA Macronychia aurata (Coquillett 1902) NEA confundens (Townsend 1915) NEA townsendi (Smith 1916) NEA Metopia argyrocephala (Meigen 1824) NEA campestris (Fallen 1810) NEA/PAL lateralis (Macquart 1848) NEA perpendicularis Wulp 1890 NEA sinipalpis Allen 1926 NEA spp. NEA Oebalia aristalis (Coquillett 1897) NEA Opsidia gonioides Coquillett 1895 NEA Phrosinella aldrichi Allen 1926 NEA aurifacies Downes 1985 NEA fulvicornis (Coquillett 1895) NEA Senotainia flavicornis (Townsend 1891) NEA inyoensis Reinhard 1955 NEA litoralis Allen 1924 NEA nana Coquillett 1897 NEA opiparis Reinhard 1955 NEA rubriventris Macquart 1846 NEA trilineata (Wulp 1890) NEA vigilans Allen 1924 NEA spp. NEA/NEO Sphenometopa tergata (Coquillett 1895) NEA Taxigramma heteroneura (Meigen 1830) NEA hilarella (Zetterstedt 1844) NEA Miltogrammini spp. NEA Paramacronychiinae Paramacronychiini Agria housei Shewell 1971 NEA Brachicoma devia (Fallen 1820) NEA sarcophagina (Townsend 1891) -
Morphological and Molecular Techniques for the Differentiation of Myiasis-Causing Sarcophagidae Jeffery T
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital Repository @ Iowa State University Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2011 Morphological and molecular techniques for the differentiation of myiasis-causing Sarcophagidae Jeffery T. Alfred Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Alfred, Jeffery T., "Morphological and molecular techniques for the differentiation of myiasis-causing Sarcophagidae" (2011). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 10390. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/10390 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Morphological and molecular techniques for the differentiation of myiasis-causing Sarcophagidae by Jeffery T. Alfred A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Entomology Program of Study Committee: Lyric Bartholomay, Major Professor Kenneth Holscher James Mertins Christine Petersen Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2011 ii Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction 1 Chapter 2. Morphological identification of myiasis-causing sarcophagids of North America north of Mexico 7 Literature Review 7 Methods and Procedures 20 Results 25 Discussion 46 Chapter 3. Molecular identification of myiasis-causing sarcophagids of North America north of Mexico 48 Literature Review 48 Methods and Procedures 50 Results 52 Discussion 56 References Cited 58 Appendix 1. -
Diptera: Aschiza)
Insect Systematics & Evolution 45 (2014) 395–414 brill.com/ise Homology of the metapleuron of Cyclorrhapha, with discussion of the paraphyly of Syrphoidea (Diptera: Aschiza) Takuji Tachi* Biosystematics Laboratory, Kyushu University, Motooka, Fukuoka City 819-0395, Japan *E-mail:[email protected] Published online 20 March 2014; published in print 20 October 2014 Abstract The morphology of the metathorax of brachyceran Diptera is examined, particularly the metapleuron in the superfamily Syrphoidea comprising two families Syrphidae and Pipunculidae. The homologies of the metepisternum (EPS) and metepimeron (EPM) are redefined based on the metapleural suture (PlS), which bears an internal apophysis. A new interpretation of the metathorax is provided for Syrphidae. Members of Schizophora and Pipunculidae have an articulation between EPM and the first abdominal tergite in common and the (metapleural-abdominal) articulation is indicated as a synapomorphy for them. In some species of Syrphidae the well-developed metapostnotum is articulated with the first abdom- inal tergite and the (metapostnotal-abdominal) articulation is diagnostic of a subgroup of the family. The articulations are evaluated and discussed with respect to abdominal flexion of Diptera. Keywords abdominal flexion; articulation structure; metapleural suture (PlS); metepimeral pleura (EPM); metepis- ternal pleura (EPS); Schizophora Introduction The Diptera have their hindwings reduced to small club-like organs, whereas their forewings are developed as functional flight organs. The halteres are considered the most important autapomorphy of the Diptera, which are indeed named for having only two fully developed wings. The halteres play an important role as gyroscopic organs of equilibrium and moves antiphasically to the forewing during flight (Fraenkel & Pringle 1938; Schneider 1953; Chan et al. -
Zootaxa, Diptera, Phoridae
Zootaxa 593: 1–11 (2004) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 593 Copyright © 2004 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA phylogeny of critical genera of Phoridae (Diptera) and related families of Aschiza CHARLES E. COOK1 , JEREMY J. AUSTIN2 & R. HENRY L. DISNEY1,3 1 Department and Museum of Zoology, University of Cambridge, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, ENGLAND. Email: [email protected] 2 The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, ENGLAND. (Current address: Sciences Department, Museum Victoria, GPO Box 666E, Melbourne VIC 3001, Australia. Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] Abstract Phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA gene sequences supports the monophyly of the Phoridae. Within this family the Phorinae clade includes two aberrant termitophilous subfam- ilies, the Thaumatoxeninae and the Termitoxeniinae, which cluster with Dohrniphora and Diplonevra. These two genera include termitophiles and parasitoids of termites, so we hypothesize that these termitophilous phorids are a monophyletic group. While the data neither refute nor sup- port the assumed monophyly of the Metopininae, the genera of this subfamily were not monophyl- etic in our analysis, but fell into two subclades that correspond with the tribes Metopinini and Gymnophorini. Key words: Diptera, Aschiza, Phoridae, rRNA sequences, phylogeny, maximum likelihood, Baye- sian phylogeny, mitochondria, mtDNA, 12S, 16S lsuRNA, ssuRNA Introduction The flies, midges, and gnats (Diptera) are a successful and widespread insect order that includes over 120 named families and over 140,000 named species. However, the majority of species still remain undescribed and unnamed. -
A Review of the Status of the Lonchopteridae, Platypezidae and Opetiidae Flies of Great Britain
Natural England Commissioned Report NECR246 A review of the status of the Lonchopteridae, Platypezidae and Opetiidae flies of Great Britain Species Status No. 34 First published 29th January 2018 www.gov.uk/natural -england Foreword Natural England commission a range of reports from external contractors to provide evidence and advice to assist us in delivering our duties. The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. Background Making good decisions to conserve species This report should be cited as: should primarily be based upon an objective process of determining the degree of threat to CHANDLER, P.J. 2017. A review of the status the survival of a species. The recognised of the Lonchopteridae, Platypezidae and international approach to undertaking this is by Opetiidae flies of Great Britain Natural England assigning the species to one of the IUCN threat Commissioned Reports, Number246. categories. This report was commissioned to update part of the 1991 review of the scarce and threatened flies of Great Britain Part 2: Nematocera and Aschiza not dealt with by Falk, edited by Falk and Chandler. This original volume included a range of families, but rather than repeat the rather large and arbitrary grouping, the Lonchopteridae, Platypezidae and Opetiidae flies were abstracted into the current review volume. Many of the remaining families will form subsequent volumes in their own right. Natural England Project Manager - David Heaver, Senior Invertebrate Specialist [email protected] Contractor - Peter Chandler Keywords - Lonchopteridae, Platypezidae, Opetiidae files, invertebrates, red list, IUCN, status reviews, IUCN threat categories, GB rarity status Further information This report can be downloaded from the Natural England Access to Evidence Catalogue: http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/ . -
Diptera, Phoridae, Sciadoceridae, Aschiza, Systematic Position
MUSEUM AND INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES FRAGMENTA FAUNISTICA Fragm. faun. Warszawa, 30.12.2001 44 309-317 R. H en ry L. DISNEY Sciadoceridae (D iptera) reconsidered Abstract: TONNOIR's (1926) assignment of Sciadocera rufomaculata W h ite to the Phoridae is supported and SCHMITZ's (1929) transfer of it and Archiphora patagonica SCHMITZ to a sep arate fam ily, Sciadoceridae, is rejected. The growing number of fossils bridging the gap between Sciadoceridae a n d Phoridae support the view that the sciadocerids are merely an assortment of Phoridae that share some plesiomorphic features. Key words: Diptera, Phoridae, Sciadoceridae, Aschiza, systematic position Author's address: University Department of Zoology, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, U. K. e-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION Y eates and WiEGMANN (1999)have provided a useful review of the higher-level phylogeny of Diptera. An area of continuing debate relates to the Aschiza (“Lower Cyclorrhapha" of these authors), especially the familes other than the Syrphoidea. Per haps the most intriguing flies in this assemblage are two present-day genera, and sev eral fossil genera, currently assigned to the family Sciadoceridae. The present paper reconsiders these genera. W HITE (1917) described Sciadocera rufomaculata (Fig. 1) from Tasmania and assigned it to the Empidae (Empididae), Hybotinae (Hybotidae). However, he commented that “the correct position of this curious genus is somewhat doubtful". TONNOIR (1923) agreed and transferred it to the Platypezidae, but noting that the wing venation (Fig. 14) is transitional between this family and the Phoridae. He subsequently reassigned it to the Phoridae, Sciadocerinae (TONN OIR 1926) . -
MCM8 Msh4 Msh5 MEI-217 MEI-218 MCM9 Figure S1. Occurrence Of
Figure S1 Hartmann et al. Msh4 Msh5MCM8 MCM9 MEI-217 MEI-218 Ephydroidea Tephritoidea Acalyptratae Diopsoidea Schizophora Muscoidea Oestroidea Calyptratae Hippoboscoidea Platypezoidea Brachycera Aschiza Syrphoidea Asiloidea Culicoidea Anoph. Culicomorpha Chironomoidea Psychodomorpha Nematocera Bibionomorpha Tipulomorpha Figure S1. Occurrence of Msh4, Msh5, MCM8, MCM9, MEI-217, and MEI-218 in Diptera. The dendrogram on the left illustrates relationships among Dipteran taxa for which sufficient genome or transcriptome sequence is available to determine with reasonable confidence the presence or absence of genes encoding proteins relevant to this work. Circles to the right indicate presence (filled) or absence (open) of each gene/protein. For the suborder Brachycera, major superfamilies within Schizophora and the sister taxon Aschiza are shown, as well as the superfamily Asiloidea. For the suborder Nematocera, only infraorders are shown, except for Culicomorpha, where both superfamiles are indicated. Within the superfamily Culicoidea (mosquitoes), MEI-217 and MEI-218 are found in Culex and Aedes but are missing from all of the 20 Anopheles species whose genomes are sequenced. It is hypothesized that the mei-MCM complex functionally replaces Msh 4/5 in Drosophila (Kohl, Jones, and Sekelsky 2012). We do not find orthologs of Msh4, Msh5, or Mcm9 in species in the Dipteran sub-order Brachycera, suggesting that the structure and function of the Drosophila mei-MCM complex may have its origins in the ancestral founder of this lineage. Interestingly, Asiloidea appear to have retained an ortholog of MCM9. It may be informative to examine these species more thoroughly when additional sequences become available. Figure S2 Hartmann et al. A Ephydroidea D. -
Flies of Illinois
)OLHVRI,OOLQRLV86$ $QJHOOD0RRUHKRXVH,OOLQRLV1DWXUH3UHVHUYHV&RPPLVVLRQ 3KRWRV$QJHOOD0RRUHKRXVH DQJHOODPRRUHKRXVH#LOOLQRLVJRY 3URGXFHG$QJHOOD0RRUHKRXVHDQG$OLFLD'LD])LHOG0XVHXP,GHQWLILFDWLRQDVVLVWDQFHSURYLGHG -RKQ$VFKHU-RKQDQG-DQH%DODEDQ.HOVH\-53%\HUV 5RE&DQQLQJV-RKQ)&DUU&KULV&RKHQ%HQ&RXOWHU(YHQ'DQNRZLF]%LOO'HDQ0DUWLQ+DXVHU5RVV+LOO -RKQ.O\PNR6SHQFHU3RWH+HUVKHO5DQH\$UWXUR6DQWRV.DWMD6FKXO]$DURQ6FKXVWHII/LDP:ROIIand .HQ:ROJHPXWK (bugguide.net; inaturalist.org) Please note: (—) = Unknown species and genus due to photographic limitations, * = Name of subfamily. )LHOG0XVHXP &&%<1&/LFHQVHGZRUNVDUHIUHHWRXVHVKDUHUHPL[ZLWKDWWULEXWLRQEXWGRHVQRWSHUPLWFRPPHUFLDOXVHRIWKHRULJLQDOZRUN 1HPDWRFHUD&UDQH)OLHV0LGJHV0RVTXLWRHVDQG%ODFN)OLHV >ILHOGJXLGHVILHOGPXVHXPRUJ@>@ versiRn1 (ULRSWHUDYHQXVWD (SLSKUDJPDVRODWUL[ *QRSKRP\LDVS 3LODULDWHQXLSHV /LPRQLLG&UDQH)O\ %DQGZLQJHG&UDQH)O\ /LPRQLLG&UDQH)O\ /LPRQLLG&UDQH)O\ /,021,,'$( /,021,,'$( /,021,,'$( /,021,,'$( 1HSKURWRPDDOWHUQD 1HSKURWRPDIHUUXJLQHD 7LSXODVS %LWWDFRPRUSKDFODYLSHV 7LJHU&UDQH)O\ )HUUXJLQRXV7LJHU&UDQH)O\ /DUJH&UDQH)O\ 3KDQWRP&UDQH)O\ 7,38/,'$( 7,38/,'$( 7,38/,'$( 37<&+237(5,'$( $[DUXVVS &KLURQLPRXVFUDVVLFDXGDWXV &KDVPDWRQRWXVVS &ULFRWRSXVVS 1RQELWLQJ0LGJH 1RQELWLQJ0LGJH :UHVWOLQJ0LGJH 1RQELWLQJ0LGJH &+,52120,'$( &+,52120,'$( &+,52120,'$( &+,52120,'$( &RHORWDQ\SXVVFDSXODULV 3VHFWURWDQ\SXVG\DUL $HGHVYH[DQV 2FKOHURWDWXVKHQGHUVRQL 1RQELWLQJ0LGJH 1RQELWLQJ0LGJH )ORRGZDWHU0RVTXLWR (DVWHUQ7UHHKROH0RVTXLWR &+,52120,'$( &+,52120,'$( &8/,&,'$( &8/,&,'$( 3VRURSKRUDFLODWD 3VRURSKRUDIHUR[ &XOLVHWDLQRUQDWD -
Bibliography of Sphaeroceridae
Bibliography 327 Bibliography of Sphaeroceridae Aartsen, B. van, Beuk, P. L. T. & Prijs, H. J. 1991. Diptera. In: Koomen, P. (ed.): Verslag van de 145e zomervergadering van de Nederlandse Entomologische Vereniging 8-10 juni te Buurse. Entomologische Berichten, Amsterdam 51(3): ix-x (in Dutch). Abraham, R. & Joswig, W. 1985. Die Parasitierung von Fliegenpuparien aus toten Schnecken durch Spalangia erythromera (Hym., Pteromalidae) und Basalys semele (Hym., Diapriidae). Spixiana 8: 285-287. Adams, C. F. 1903. Diptera of Kansas. Descriptions of six new species. The Kansas University Science Bulletin 2(5): 221-223. Adams, C. F. 1904. Notes and descriptions of North American Diptera. The Kansas University Science Bulletin 2(14): 433-455. Adams, C. F. 1905. Diptera Africana, I. The Kansas University Science Bulletin 3(6): 149-208. Aldrich, J. M. 1897. A collection of Diptera from Indiana caves. Annual Report of the Indiana Department of Geology and Natural Resources 21(1896): 186-190. Aldrich, J. M. 1905. A catalogue of North American Diptera (or two-winged flies). Smithsonian Institution, Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collection 46 (1444): 1-680. Aldrich, J. M. 1933. Notes on Diptera. No. 6. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 35: 165-170. Allen, A. A. 1977. Sphaerocera scabricula Hal. (Diptera, Sphaeroceridae) recaptured near London. The Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 112: 242. Andersson, H. 1967. Faunistic, ecological and taxonomic notes on Icelandic Diptera. Opuscula Entomologica 32: 101-120. Antiga, P. 1888. Contribución a la fauna de Cataluña. Catálogo de los Dípteros observados en diferentes sitios del Principado. 16 pp., Imprenta de Viuda e Hijos de J. Subirana, Barce- lona. -
Episodic Radiations in the Fly Tree of Life
Episodic radiations in the fly tree of life Brian M. Wiegmanna,1, Michelle D. Trautweina, Isaac S. Winklera, Norman B. Barra,b, Jung-Wook Kima, Christine Lambkinc,d, Matthew A. Bertonea, Brian K. Cassela, Keith M. Baylessa, Alysha M. Heimberge, Benjamin M. Wheelerf, Kevin J. Petersone, Thomas Papeg, Bradley J. Sinclairh, Jeffrey H. Skevingtoni, Vladimir Blagoderovj, Jason Caravask, Sujatha Narayanan Kuttyl, Urs Schmidt-Ottm, Gail E. Kampmeiern, F. Christian Thompsono, David A. Grimaldip, Andrew T. Beckenbachq, Gregory W. Courtneyr, Markus Friedrichk, Rudolf Meierl,s, and David K. Yeatesd Departments of aEntomology and fComputer Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695; bCenter for Plant Health Science and Technology, Mission Laboratory, US Department of Agriculture-Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Moore Air Base, Edinburg, TX 78541; cQueensland Museum, South Bank, Brisbane, Queensland 4101, Australia; eDepartment of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755; gNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark; hCanadian National Collection of Insects, Ottawa Plant Laboratory-Entomology, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1A 0C6; iInvertebrate Biodiversity, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1A 0C6; jDepartment of Entomology, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom; kDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202; lDepartment of Biological Sciences and sUniversity Scholars Programme, -
The Adequacy of Collecting Techniques for Estimating Species Richness Of
Journal of ADVANCES IN APPLIED ECOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES Applied Ecology 2000, 37, The adequacy of collecting techniques for estimating 884±893 species richness of grassland invertebrates VALERIE STANDEN Department of Biological Sciences, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK Summary 1. There is still considerable debate about the most eective methods of sampling invertebrates in monitoring and assessment programmes. 2. The above-ground invertebrates of a limestone grassland in north-east England were compared between samples from pitfall traps and from a D-vac suction trap combined with a lightweight swish net (SW/DV). 3. Over 14 000 individuals were captured, with similar numbers in the pitfall and SW/DV samples. A total of 480 species of Hemiptera, Coleoptera, Diptera and Araneae was identi®ed and placed into 14 taxa for further analysis. 4. The pitfall sample produced species/specimen curves from which it was possible to estimate species richness for all the Coleoptera and Araneae taxa and the calyp- terate Schizophora. The SW/DV sample was adequate to estimate the species rich- ness of Hemiptera, most Diptera taxa, herbivorous Coleoptera and Linyphiidae. 5. The proportion of Coleoptera and Araneae taxa that were method-unique was higher in the pitfall sample than the SW/DV sample and vice versa for the Hemi- ptera and Diptera taxa. Nevertheless, a relatively high proportion of method- unique species of most taxa was found in both sample types, indicating that they can each contribute to assessing species assemblages in grasslands. 6. Both pitfall traps and SW/DV samples are needed to estimate species richness in grasslands for all taxa except Heteroptera, Homoptera and Lycosidae.