DOCSLIB.ORG

Diversity of Carabidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) in Epiphytic Bromeliaceae in Central Veracruz, Mexico

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Diversity of Carabidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) in Epiphytic Bromeliaceae in Central Veracruz, Mexico COMMUNITY AND ECOSYSTEM ECOLOGY Diversity of Carabidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) in Epiphytic Bromeliaceae in Central Veracruz, Mexico 1,2 2 3 E. MONTES DE OCA, G. E. BALL, AND J. R. SPENCE Environ. Entomol. 36(3): 560Ð568 (2007) ABSTRACT This paper documents the existence of carabid assemblages associated with bromeliads on the Cofre de Perote, Veracruz, Mexico. Based on bromeliads sampled over three altitudinal ranges, the assemblages included at least 26 species with an arboreal lifestyle and another 11 species that are not strictly arboreal. Seven species are new to science, urging us to pay attention to the arboreal fauna in forest conservation studies. Composition of carabid assemblages associated with bromeliads changes with alti- tude. In lowlands, it is comprised almost entirely of species of Lebiini, with the Platynini dominating assemblages found in bromeliads Ͼ1,000 m above sea level. Our data suggest that carabids use bromeliads to reduce stresses associated with drought periods, the exact timing of which depends on altitude. The unexpected low diversity of the carabid fauna associated with bromeliads at middle altitude is explained in terms of anthropogenic conversion of the original forest to pastureland. Given the importance of arboreal elements, further fragmentation of subtropical and tropical mountain forest signiÞcantly threatens overall carabid diversity. Este trabajo presenta la existencia de ensambles de cara´bidos asociados con bromelias en el Cofre de Perote, Veracruz, Me´xico. Con base en un muestreo de bromelias efectuado en tres rangos altitudinales los ensambles incluyeron al menos 26 especies con aÞnidad arbo´rea y otras once sin esa aÞnidad. Siete especies de cara´bidos son nuevas especies con lo cual se llama la atencio´n sobre la importancia de considerar la fauna arbo´rea en los estudios de conservacio´n de bosques. La composicio´ndelos ensambles de cara´bidos asociados a bromelias cambia con la altitud. En tierras bajas se compone casi completamente por especies de la tribu Lebiini en tanto que especies de la tribu Platynini dominan en los ensambles que se encuentran en bromelias por arriba de los 1,000 metros de altitud. Nuestros datos sugieren que los cara´bidos usan las bromelias para reducir el estre´s asociado con perõ´odos de sequõ´a, cuya ocurrencia depende de la altitud. La inesperada baja diversidad de cara´bidos asociados a bromelias que se encontro´ en altitudes medias se explica en te´rminos de la conversio´n de los bosques originales a tierras de pastoreo. Dada la importancia de los elementos arbo´reos, la continua frag- mentacio´n del bosque montano tropical y subtropical amenaza signiÞcativamente la diversidad de cara´bidos. KEY WORDS altitude, bromeliads, carabids, diversity, Mexico The role of epiphytic plants for establishment and than 40 beetle families including ground beetles maintenance of the extraordinary arthropod diver- (Carabidae) have been recorded, even in tree sity in forest canopies has been well documented crowns of old-growth temperate deciduous forest (Richardson 1999, Stuntz et al. 1999, Greeney 2001, (Gering and Crist 2000). For tropical rain forests, Stuntz et al. 2002). For example, Beutelspacher the high number of carabid beetle species sampled (1999) recognized 47 insect families belonging to 14 from the canopy suggests that the diversity of this orders in just one bromeliad species. In particular, family is far higher than previously thought (Lucky beetles are well represented in such forest canopy et al. 2002). Beutelspacher (1972) reported four communities (Floren and Linsenmair 1998). More carabid species with “certain frequency” in epi- phytes, and Murillo et al. (1983) concluded this family was one of the seven most abundant among 1 Corresponding author: Department Biodiversidad y Ecologõ´a An- imal, Instituto de Ecologõ´a, A.C., Km 2.5 Carretera Antigua, a Coate- the bromeliad-associated insect fauna. In an explan- pec no. 351 Congregacio´n El Haya, C.P. 91070 Xalapa, Veracruz, atory summary about the carabids of Mexico, Ball Mexico (e-mail: [email protected]). and Shpeley (2000) highlighted the importance of 2 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Ed- the arboreal lifestyle with respect to the diversity of monton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada. 3 Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Ed- the carabid fauna in tropical areas. They showed monton, Alberta T6G 2H1, Canada. that 24% of the 172 genera of carabids extant in 0046-225X/07/0560Ð0568$04.00/0 ᭧ 2007 Entomological Society of America June 2007 MONTES DE OCA ET AL.: CARABIDS AND BROMELIADS IN VERACRUZ,MEXICO 561 Mexico include arboreal species, and many such in which trees harbored many epiphytic bromeliads species have been collected from epiphytes, espe- on trunks and branches. The spatial distribution of cially bromeliads. bromeliads in Veracruz is highly aggregated, but there Bromeliads and their associated fauna are well-de- is no evidence of further spatial segregation of bro- Þned biological systems (Picado 1913, Delamare-De- meliad species within these aggregations (Hietz and bouteville 1948, Beutelspacher 1972, Benzing 1986, Hietz-Seifert 1994, 1995). Therefore, in this study of Willimas and Feltmate 1992, Beutelspacher 1999, Ri- carabid beetles, we considered all bromeliads, regard- chardson 1999). These epiphytic plants have rosetted, less of species, as equivalent potential habitats. overlapping wide leaves that allow water and debris According to Hietz and Hietz-Seifert (1994), one accumulation, which favors establishment of a variety can Þnd 12 bromeliad species (Tillandsia) at the low of organisms. Leaves form a cup or small tank that altitude sites of range A, whereas the species number becomes occupied by water and organic matter increases to 28 (3 Catopsis and 25 Tillandsia)atthe (sprigs, leaves, fruits, seeds, spores, pollen grains, ßow- middle altitude sites on range B. The number of ex- ers, etc.). Water from rain or mist condensation is pected bromeliad species decrease to ϳ10 (1 Catopsis deposited in the tank during the rainy season and and 9 Tillandsia) over range C. Those authors re- slowly evaporates during the dry season. This water is ported no bromeliads at Ͼ3,000 m of elevation. partially absorbed by the plant itself, and it is also used Sampling Protocol. Bromeliads were sampled for by multiple organisms, which in return supply nutri- carabids by at least two people once about every 45 d ents derived from their activities to the plant. during a full year interval (July 2000 to June 2001) in It is reasonable to suppose that tight relationships, each one of the altitudinal ranges. Because some ep- perhaps even mutualisms, could develop between bro- iphytic bromeliads are threatened through illegal meliads and some animals that depend on them for trade of ornamental plants, we sought to minimize particular aspects of their life cycles. For example, the destruction of the plants as follows: (1) we sampled metabolic wastes and remains of dead ants result in a only from one of several possible sites in each altitude large contribution of nutrients for the plants and for during each sampling period, (2) if Þve consecutive the bromeliad inhabitants as well (Rickson 1979, Da- bromeliads were sampled from at least two trees at vidson et al. 1989, Rico-Gray et al. 1989, Benzing 1990, least 10 m apart with failure to Þnd any carabids, Olmsted et al. 1995, Treseder et al. 1995, Benzing sampling was terminated at that site for that sampling 2000). The beneÞts offered by epiphytes to their as- period, (3) a maximum of 25 bromeliads was sampled sociated fauna are hypothesized to include cover and at a site during a particular sampling period, and (4) refuge against predators and/or extreme climatic con- only bromeliads no more than 5 m above the ground ditions, a supply of water, resting sites, or aggregation were sampled (this was also partly a constraint of the sites useful for mating (Benzing 1970, 1984, 1990). cutting pole used). Samples came from isolated trees In this paper, we describe and analyze the carabid or groups of trees at least 10 m apart as they were assemblage associated with epiphytic bromeliads in encountered haphazardly in walking through the sites. central Veracruz, Mexico. We show that there is a Neither tree nor bromeliad species were identiÞed nor regular carabid assemblage associated with bromeli- speciÞcally targeted in this study. ads that includes some species commonly living at Bromeliads were cut and pulled down using exten- ground level. Our data suggest that the association sible branch-cutters and a curved blade and immedi- between carabids and bromeliads has a distinct sea- ately disassembled leaf by leaf and shaken over a sonal component, underscoring the potential role of plastic sheet placed on the ground. Individual carabids these epiphytes in relieving water stress during dry routed by these procedures were captured and pre- seasons. Moreover, this latter effect interacts with served in tubes with vapor of ethyl acetate. To in- altitude so that patterns must be understood in the crease efÞciency of collection, specimens belonging to context of altitudinal zones. We conclude with a gen- other taxa were ignored. Although we conducted no eral discussion about the contribution of the brome- tests of sampling efÞcacy, we felt that we collected liads to the diversity of the carabid fauna of the study virtually all the beetles in the bromeliads. IdentiÞca- area. tion of subsequently pinned specimens was made to the speciÞc level using dichotomous keys (G.E.B. and E.M.O., unpublished data) and by comparison with Materials and Methods previously identiÞed material held at the University of Study Area. This study was conducted on the south- Alberta Strickland Museum (UASM). The material eastern slope of the Cofre de Perote (CP), a mountain from this study is housed in the carabid collection of located in central Veracruz, Mexico, between 19Њ40Ј, the Instituto de Ecologõ´a A.C.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Genus-Level Supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 7 (2008) 255–269 www.elsevier.de/ode A genus-level supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G. Beutela,Ã, Ignacio Riberab, Olaf R.P. Bininda-Emondsa aInstitut fu¨r Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, FSU Jena, Germany bMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, Spain Received 14 October 2005; accepted 17 May 2006 Abstract A supertree for Adephaga was reconstructed based on 43 independent source trees – including cladograms based on Hennigian and numerical cladistic analyses of morphological and molecular data – and on a backbone taxonomy. To overcome problems associated with both the size of the group and the comparative paucity of available information, our analysis was made at the genus level (requiring synonymizing taxa at different levels across the trees) and used Safe Taxonomic Reduction to remove especially poorly known species. The final supertree contained 401 genera, making it the most comprehensive phylogenetic estimate yet published for the group. Interrelationships among the families are well resolved. Gyrinidae constitute the basal sister group, Haliplidae appear as the sister taxon of Geadephaga+ Dytiscoidea, Noteridae are the sister group of the remaining Dytiscoidea, Amphizoidae and Aspidytidae are sister groups, and Hygrobiidae forms a clade with Dytiscidae. Resolution within the species-rich Dytiscidae is generally high, but some relations remain unclear. Trachypachidae are the sister group of Carabidae (including Rhysodidae), in contrast to a proposed sister-group relationship between Trachypachidae and Dytiscoidea. Carabidae are only monophyletic with the inclusion of a non-monophyletic Rhysodidae, but resolution within this megadiverse group is generally low. Non-monophyly of Rhysodidae is extremely unlikely from a morphological point of view, and this group remains the greatest enigma in adephagan systematics.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) Peter W
    30 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 42, Nos. 1 & 2 An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Peter W. Messer1 Abstract A survey of Carabidae in the state of Wisconsin, U.S.A. yielded 87 species new to the state and incorporated 34 species previously reported from the state but that were not included in an earlier catalogue, bringing the total number of species to 489 in an annotated checklist. Collection data are provided in full for the 87 species new to Wisconsin but are limited to county occurrences for 187 rare species previously known in the state. Recent changes in nomenclature pertinent to the Wisconsin fauna are cited. ____________________ The Carabidae, commonly known as ‘ground beetles’, with 34, 275 described species worldwide is one of the three most species-rich families of extant beetles (Lorenz 2005). Ground beetles are often chosen for study because they are abun- dant in most terrestrial habitats, diverse, taxonomically well known, serve as sensitive bioindicators of habitat change, easy to capture, and morphologically pleasing to the collector. North America north of Mexico accounts for 2635 species which were listed with their geographic distributions (states and provinces) in the catalogue by Bousquet and Larochelle (1993). In Table 4 of the latter refer- ence, the state of Wisconsin was associated with 374 ground beetle species. That is more than the surrounding states of Iowa (327) and Minnesota (323), but less than states of Illinois (452) and Michigan (466). The total count for Minnesota was subsequently increased to 433 species (Gandhi et al. 2005). Wisconsin county distributions are known for 15 species of tiger beetles (subfamily Cicindelinae) (Brust 2003) with collection records documented for Tetracha virginica (Grimek 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Tesis Paleologos
    1 Agradecimientos Durante estos años son muchas las personas que han participado de alguna u otra manera en este trabajo y a quienes quiero expresar mi gratitud por el apoyo y la confianza que me han prestado de forma desinteresada. En primer lugar quiero agradecer a Claudio, mi marido, por aguantarme y escucharme en los buenos y malos momentos de este largo proceso. Quiero agradecer de una manera muy especial al Dr. Armando C. Cicchino, por la determinación de los ejemplares y la caracterización de la carabidofauna. Su ayuda desinteresada, gratitud y apoyo en los momentos más difíciles de este proceso no tienen precio. De la misma manera quiero agradecer a Daniela, su esposa, por abrirme las puertas de su casa y hacerme sentir como una hija. Gracias! A Gabriel Baloriani, un compañero y amigo con el que he compartido los buenos y malos momentos que implica el trabajo de campo y de laboratorio. Gracias por su amistad y ayuda. No puedo dejar de agradecer a los productores de vid de la costa de Berisso, a Beti, Tita, Raúl, Chango y su familia, por su incondicional ayuda y por brindarme su confianza y gratitud durante las horas de trabajo de campo. Un agradecimiento de todo corazón a mis amigas, por estar y darme el espacio para descargar las frustraciones que caracterizan este largo proceso. Un sincero agradecimiento a mis directores, Santiago Sarandón y Patricia Pereyra, por el tiempo que me han dado, por sus sugerencias e ideas de las que tanto provecho he sacado, por el respaldo y la amistad.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in an Organic Apple Orchard Using Molecular Gut-Content Analysis
    insects Article Elucidating the Common Generalist Predators of Conotrachelus nenuphar (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in an Organic Apple Orchard Using Molecular Gut-Content Analysis Jason M. Schmidt 1,2,*, Zsofia Szendrei 1 and Matthew Grieshop 1 1 Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, 578 Wilson Rd., East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; [email protected] (Z.S.); [email protected] (M.G.) 2 Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, 2360 Rainwater Rd., Tifton, GA 31793, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-229-386-7251 Academic Editors: Andrew G. S. Cuthbertson and Eric W. Riddick Received: 22 April 2016; Accepted: 20 June 2016; Published: 24 June 2016 Abstract: Conotrachelus nenuphar (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), plum curculio, is a serious direct pest of North American tree fruit including, apples, cherries, peaches and plums. Historically, organophosphate insecticides were used for control, but this tool is no longer registered for use in tree fruit. In addition, few organically approved insecticides are available for organic pest control and none have proven efficacy as this time. Therefore, promoting biological control in these systems is the next step, however, little is known about the biological control pathways in this system and how these are influenced by current mechanical and cultural practices required in organic systems. We used molecular gut-content analysis for testing field caught predators for feeding on plum curculio. During the study we monitored populations of plum curculio and the
    [Show full text]
  • Carabidae (Coleoptera) and Other Arthropods Collected in Pitfall Traps in Iowa Cornfields, Fencerows and Prairies Kenneth Lloyd Esau Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1968 Carabidae (Coleoptera) and other arthropods collected in pitfall traps in Iowa cornfields, fencerows and prairies Kenneth Lloyd Esau Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Esau, Kenneth Lloyd, "Carabidae (Coleoptera) and other arthropods collected in pitfall traps in Iowa cornfields, fencerows and prairies " (1968). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 3734. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/3734 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 69-4232 ESAU, Kenneth Lloyd, 1934- CARABIDAE (COLEOPTERA) AND OTHER ARTHROPODS COLLECTED IN PITFALL TRAPS IN IOWA CORNFIELDS, FENCEROWS, AND PRAIRIES. Iowa State University, Ph.D., 1968 Entomology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan CARABIDAE (COLEOPTERA) AND OTHER ARTHROPODS COLLECTED IN PITFALL TRAPS IN IOWA CORNFIELDS, PENCEROWS, AND PRAIRIES by Kenneth Lloyd Esau A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Pkrtial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Healthy Forest?
    SINCE 1976 THE FRIENDS OF DYKE MARSH SUMMER 2015 What Is a Healthy Forest? Challenges Include Invasive Aliens and Global Warming Join us on September 16, 7:30 p.m., when Joe Marx will discuss what a healthy Mid-Atlantic forest might look like, whether the pre-settlement forest was in fact healthy, and what chance a healthy forest would have in our era of invasive FODM Quarterly Meeting aliens and global warming. Wednesday, September 16, at Definitions of forest health vary 7:30 p.m., Huntley Meadows greatly along a scale from total human Park, Norma Hoffman Visitor exclusion to total human management. Center, 3701 Lockheed Blvd., Although the Mid-Atlantic states were Alexandria, VA 22306. Phone blanketed with a largely deciduous forest Scenic view of the George Washington 703-768-2525. Free to all. at the time of European contact, the abo- National Forest. Photo by Bob Veltkamp. riginal peoples manipulated this forest to Calendar of Events a much wider extent than is commonly Field Studies program sponsored by the August 29 - 10 a.m., Pollina- realized. Today, many in the natural histo- Graduate School USA and the Audubon tor Walk; details, see page 5. ry community hope that the remaining Naturalist Society. October 24 - 10 a.m., Fall Col- Mid-Atlantic forestland can be preserved The meeting is cosponsored by the ors Walk; details, see page 5. in a healthy condition. What should we American Horticultural Society, the Po- November 18 - 7:30 p.m., Fall aim for? What is the right balance be- towmack Chapter of the Virginia Native FODM Quarterly Meeting; tween combating alien organisms and Plant Society, the Fairfax Chapter of Vir- LoriAnne Burnette on nature’s letting natural succession run its course? ginia Master Naturalists and the Fairfax exquisite timing, phenology.
    [Show full text]
  • What Shapes Ground Beetle Assemblages in a Tree Species-Rich Subtropical Forest?
    ZooKeys 1044: 907–927 (2021) A peer-reviewed open-access journal doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1044.63803 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research What shapes ground beetle assemblages in a tree species-rich subtropical forest? Pascale Zumstein1, Helge Bruelheide2,3, Andreas Fichtner1, Andreas Schuldt4, Michael Staab5, Werner Härdtle1, Hongzhang Zhou6, Thorsten Assmann1 1 Institute of Ecology, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Universitätsstraße 1, 21335, Lüneburg, Germany 2 Institute of Biology/Geobotany, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06108 Halle (Saale), Germany 3 German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany 4 Forest Nature Conservation, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Büsgenweg 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany 5 Ecological Networks, Technical University Darmstadt, Schnittspahnstraße 3, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany 6 Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China Corresponding author: Pascale Zumstein ([email protected]) Academic editor: John Spence | Received 31 January 2021 | Accepted 8 April 2021 | Published 16 June 2021 http://zoobank.org/A8ED7174-2412-46B4-9A5D-0345ADE42D07 Citation: Zumstein P, Bruelheide H, Fichtner A, Schuldt A, Staab M, Härdtle W, Zhou H, Assmann T (2021) What shapes ground beetle assemblages in a tree species-rich subtropical forest? In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JK, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940–2020). ZooKeys 1044: 907–927. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.63803 Abstract As woody plants provide much of the trophic basis for food webs in forests their species richness, but also stand age and numerous further variables such as vegetation structure, soil properties and elevation can shape assemblages of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae).
    [Show full text]
  • Movement Patterns of Carabid Beetles Between Heterogenous Crop and Noncrop Habitats
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 47 Numbers 3 & 4 - Fall/Winter 2014 Numbers 3 & Article 7 4 - Fall/Winter 2014 October 2014 Movement Patterns of Carabid Beetles Between Heterogenous Crop and Noncrop Habitats Heather Russon Kalamazoo College J. Megan Woltz Oregon State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Russon, Heather and Woltz, J. Megan 2014. "Movement Patterns of Carabid Beetles Between Heterogenous Crop and Noncrop Habitats," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 47 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol47/iss2/7 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Russon and Woltz: Movement Patterns of Carabid Beetles Between Heterogenous Crop an 186 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 47, Nos. 3 - 4 Movement Patterns of Carabid Beetles Between Heterogenous Crop and Noncrop Habitats Heather Russon1 and J. Megan Woltz2,3 Abstract Habitats adjacent to crop fields can increase natural enemy populations by providing additional food, shelter and overwintering sites. While many studies have focused on the role of non-crop borders for supporting natural enemies, here we investigate the influence of adjacent crop habitats as well. We monitored the movement of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) between wheat fields and adjacent crop and non-crop habitats using bi-directional pitfall traps. We found greater movement of carabids from corn into wheat fields than from forest and soybean, with intermediate levels of movement from roadside vegetation.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae)
    251 Using Malaise traps to sample ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Michael D. Ulyshen,1 James L. Hanula, Scott Horn USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, 320 Green Street, Athens, Georgia 30602-2044, United States of America Ulyshen256 et al. Pitfall traps provide an easy and inexpensive This is part of a larger study investigating the way to sample ground-dwelling arthropods response of insects to the creation of canopy (Spence and Niemela 1994; Spence et al. 1997; gaps in a bottomland hardwood forest in the Abildsnes and Tommeras 2000) and have been southeastern United States. The gaps were cre- used exclusively in many studies of the abun- ated within a 120-ha stand of 75-year-old dance and diversity of ground beetles bottomland hardwoods at the Savannah River (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Despite the popularity Site (near Aiken, South Carolina), a nuclear of this trapping technique, pitfall traps have production facility and Environmental Research many disadvantages. For example, they often Park of 80 269 ha owned and operated by the fail to collect both small (Spence and Niemela United States Department of Energy. For a de- 1994) and “trap-shy” species (Benest 1989), tailed description of the study site, including eventually deplete the local carabid population the dominant plant species present, consult (Digweed et al. 1995), require a species to be Ulyshen et al. (2004). ground-dwelling in order to be captured We established 72 trapping locations in and (Liebherr and Mahar 1979), and produce differ- around canopy gaps of varying size (0.13, 0.26, ent results depending on trap diameter and ma- and 0.50 ha) and age (1 or 7 years).
    [Show full text]
  • Carabid Beetle Diversity and Distribution in Boston Harbor Islands National Park Area (Coleoptera, Carabidae)
    Carabid beetle diversity and distribution in Boston Harbor Islands national park area (Coleoptera, Carabidae) The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Davidson R.L., J. Rykken, and B. Farrell. 2011. "Carabid beetle diversity and distribution in Boston Harbor Islands national park area (Coleoptera, Carabidae)." In Erwin T (Ed) Proceedings of a symposium honoring the careers of Ross and Joyce Bell and their contributions to scientific work. Burlington, Vermont, 12–15 June 2010. ZooKeys 147: 497– 526. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.147.2111 Published Version 10.3897/zookeys.147.2111 Citable link https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37368731 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys Carabid147: 497–526 beetle (2011) diversity and distribution in Boston Harbor Islands national park area.... 497 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.147.2111 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Carabid beetle diversity and distribution in Boston Harbor Islands national park area (Coleoptera, Carabidae) Robert L. Davidson1, Jessica Rykken2, Brian Farrell2 1 Section of Invertebrate Zoology, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 4400 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh PA 15213 2 Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 Corresponding author: Robert L. Davidson ([email protected]) Academic editor: T. Erwin | Received 16 May 2011 | Accepted 20 September 2011 | Published 16 November 2011 Citation: Davidson RL, Rykken J, Farrell B (2011) Carabid beetle diversity and distribution in Boston Harbor Islands national park area (Coleoptera, Carabidae).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the RESTRUCTURING of ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS in RESPONSE to PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell a Dissertation Submitt
    THE RESTRUCTURING OF ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS IN RESPONSE TO PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell 1 A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology and Wildlife Ecology Winter 2019 © Adam B. Mitchell All Rights Reserved THE RESTRUCTURING OF ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS IN RESPONSE TO PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell Approved: ______________________________________________________ Jacob L. Bowman, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology Approved: ______________________________________________________ Mark W. Rieger, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources Approved: ______________________________________________________ Douglas J. Doren, Ph.D. Interim Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Douglas W. Tallamy, Ph.D. Professor in charge of dissertation I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Charles R. Bartlett, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Jeffery J. Buler, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Twelve Ground Beetles New to Virginia Or the District of Columbia
    Banisteria, Number 43, pages 40-55 © 2014 Virginia Natural History Society Twelve Ground Beetles New to Virginia or the District of Columbia and an Annotated Checklist of the Geadephaga (Coleoptera, Adephaga) from the George Washington Memorial Parkway Brent W. Steury U.S. National Park Service 700 George Washington Memorial Parkway Turkey Run Park Headquarters McLean, Virginia 22101 Peter W. Messer 4315 W. Riverlake Drive Mequon, Wisconsin 53092 ABSTRACT One-hundred eighty-four species in 70 genera of geadephagan beetles (183 carabids and one rhysodid) were documented during a nine-year field survey of a national park site (George Washington Memorial Parkway) that spans parts of Fairfax and Arlington counties and the City of Alexandria in Virginia, and the District of Columbia. The capture of Elaphropus quadrisignatus (Duftschmid) represents the second record for the New World. Seven species, E. quadrisignatus, Harpalus rubripes (Duftschmid), Microlestes pusio (LeConte), Platynus opaculus LeConte, Pterostichus permundus (Say), P. sculptus LeConte, and Scarites vicinus Chaudoir are documented for the first time from the Commonwealth. Seven species, Anisodactylus dulcicollis (LaFerté-Sénectère), Elaphropus anceps (LeConte), E. saturatus (Casey), Oodes americanus Dejean, P. permundus, S. vicinus, and Tachys potomaca (Erwin) are documented for the first time from the District of Columbia. The study increases the number of geadephagan beetles known from the Potomac River Gorge to 255 species and the number from Virginia to 543 taxa. Hand picking and Malaise traps proved to be the most successful capture methods of the eight methods employed during the survey. Periods of adult activity, based on dates of capture, are given for each species.
    [Show full text]