'A Message from Nathan and Beth'
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Management Plan 2012 ‐ 2023
ST CATHERINE’S HILL & TOWN COMMON MANAGEMENT PLAN 2012 ‐ 2023 FINAL DRAFT SEPTEMBER 2012 We value our local countryside for its natural beauty and wildlife. This area has been influenced by past generations and is now cared for by a partnership that will take its needs into account for all to enjoy into the future. St Catherine’s Hill & Town Common Management Plan – Final Draft St Catherine’s Hill & Town Common Management Plan 2012 ‐ 2023 Prepared by the St Catherine’s Hill & Town Common Management Plan Steering Group, including Christchurch Borough Council Countryside Service in association with Jude Smith, Rick Minter and Alison Parfitt. “On behalf of the Steering Group I believe that this Plan brings forward a balanced approach to securing the future management of the habitats and landscape on St Catherine’s Hill and Town Common. This will ensure that the most important features are conserved and enhanced with the active involvement of local people. I therefore commend this Plan to you.” Councillor Sue Spittle Chairman, St Catherine’s Hill & Town Common Management Plan Steering Group Citation For bibliography purposes this management plan should be referred to as: Smith, J.E., Parfitt A., Minter, R. & Christchurch Countryside Service. 2012. St Catherine's Hill & Town Common Management Plan, 2012 ‐ 2023. Prepared for St Catherine’s Hill & Town Common Management Plan Steering Group, c/o Christchurch Borough Council, Christchurch. Alison Parfitt Tel: 01242 584982 E‐mail: [email protected] St Catherine’s Hill & Town Common Management Plan – Final Draft CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................ 1 Background....................................................................................................................... 1 Work of the Steering Group ............................................................................................. -
Fixed-Term Parliaments Act
House of Commons House of Lords Joint Committee on the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act Report Session 2019–21 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 18 March 2021 Ordered by the House of Lords to be printed 18 March 2021 HC 1046 HL 253 Published on 24 March 2021 by authority of the House of Commons and House of Lords Joint Committee on the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act The Joint Committee was appointed to: (a) carry out a review of the operation of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011, pursuant to section 7 of that Act, and if appropriate in consequence of its findings, make recommendations for the repeal or amendment of that Act; and (b) consider, as part of its work under subparagraph (a), and report on any draft Government Bill on the repeal of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 presented to both Houses in this session. Membership House of Lords House of Commons Lord McLoughlin (Chair) (Conservative) Aaron Bell MP (Conservative, Newcastle- under-Lyme) Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat) Chris Bryant MP (Labour, Rhondda) Lord Grocott (Labour) Jackie Doyle-Price MP (Conservative, Lord Jay of Ewelme (Crossbench) Thurrock) Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon (Labour) Dame Angela Eagle MP (Labour, Wallasey) Lord Mancroft (Conservative) Maria Eagle MP (Labour, Garston and Halewood) Peter Gibson MP (Conservative, Darlington) Mr Robert Goodwill MP (Conservative, Scarborough and Whitby) David Linden MP (Scottish National Party, Glasgow East) Alan Mak MP (Conservative, Havant) Mrs Maria Miller MP -
H2U ...Bringing Highcliffe to You
H2U ...bringing Highcliffe to you... Highcliffe School, Parkside, Highcliffe, Christchurch, BH23 4QD [email protected] Highcliffe Achieves Second Specialism Congratulations are due to the Faculty. The exciting cludes a large commitment our Science and Mathe- proposals will ensure that to Mathematics within its matics teams who put to- students get greater access brief and the two subject gether an excellent bid to to extra curricular areas will benefit from in- enable Highcliffe to be se- opportunities and that creased resources, train- lected as one of the first parents and other members ing, visits and enrichment schools in the country to of the community will be activities. hold two specialist sub- able to enjoy the Report by Mr Jones jects. We now have Sci- opportunity to participate in ence College status to some of the planned stand alongside our status activities such as a series of as Language College. community lectures Very involving high profile and Our Science Faculty has exciting speakers. We shall Important undergone tremendous de- be working more closely velopment in the last three with our feeder and partner Notice for All years. The refurbishment schools in Christchurch to Parents in the of eleven laboratories continue to raise the profile means that all subject ar- of Science, even more area. eas are now taught in important in the light of See Page 2 state of the art recent concerns facilities. nationally over the There has also declining number of been a pro- students going on gramme of to study Science in INSIDE THIS ISSUE major im- higher education. -
Highcliffe School 11-18 Foundation School and Specialist College
Highcliffe School 11-18 Foundation School and Specialist College Information Intake 2010 Vision Statement: I believe in using what you have, instead of mourning for that which you do not. In thirty years time, I want to be able to look back at my youth and know that I used my talents fully: that I wasted nothing Highcliffe School Welcome Dear Parents Welcome to Highcliffe and thank you for showing an interest in our school. Please accept, with my compliments, this copy of our School Information Booklet, which I hope will help you to get to know us better. The ethos at Highcliffe – the ‘feel’ of our School, is very special. We emphasise enjoyment in learning, within a caring, purposeful and stimulating environment, where individual students matter and their well being and success are paramount. At the heart of any harmonious, ambitious community lie personal relationships which encourage, challenge and enable all to give of their best – striving to build upon their previous best – on a daily basis. ‘Excellence for All, Excellence from All’. We therefore seek to provide the highest-quality educational opportunities for our students. To make our school even better is our ambition. We will need the participation and commitment of our students, and the support of our parents, if we are to meet this challenge. I believe that it is our responsibility to make a positive difference to the future life chances of each and every person. Highcliffe is a successful school and we can all be proud of our students and their achievements in a wide range of fields. -
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council
7/4/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council Personal Details: Name: Cheryl Johnson E-mail: [email protected] Postcode: Organisation Name: Bournemouth Borough Council Comment text: I fully support these proposals. I have been a Councillor with Bournemouth Council since 2008 and I think these proposals would work very well for our town. Thank you. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/13340 1/1 7/4/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council Personal Details: Name: Cheryl Johnson E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I support this proposal. It looks very sensible to me. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/13339 1/1 7/11/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council Personal Details: Name: Claire Bath E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Christchurch Borough Council Comment text: I like the revised proposals for the Christchurch wards. I have spent time looking at them and believe they are an improvement on the previous County Council ward boundaries. They reflect the communities and their cohesion and the things that give residents a commonality. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/13534 1/1 7/18/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council Personal Details: Name: Ron Parker E-mail: [email protected] Postcode: Organisation Name: Borough of Poole Comment text: I believe the BCP proposals for Parkstone and Oakdale wards better fit the community frame work than the commissions.Parkstone should have three councillor's. -
Highcliffe Area Profile Christchurch and East Dorset Highcliffe Area Profile
Core Strategy Area Profile Options for Consideration Consultation 4th October – 24th December 2010 Highcliffe Prepared by Christchurch Borough Council and East Dorset District Council as part of the Local Development Framework October 2010 Contents 1 Area Overview 2 2 Planning Policy Context 3 3 Existing Community Facilities 7 4 Housing 8 5 Employment 12 6 Transport 12 7 Core Strategic Messages 13 Highcliffe Area Profile Christchurch and East Dorset Highcliffe Area Profile 1 Area Overview 1.1 This profile area is the most eastern neighbourhood of the Borough of Christchurch and consists of two administrative wards: Highcliffe and North Highcliffe and Walkford. The area is contained on its northern side by the Railway. The busy A337 runs through the area connecting Highcliffe with the A35 to the town centre and Hampshire to the west. Picture 1.1 Location Map 1.2 Highcliffe has developed as a small town with extensive suburban housing around a local commercial high street, designated as a district centre. The centre provides a range of convenience and comparison units and after Christchurch Town Centre is the second largest retail centre in the Borough 1.3 The area has a strong separate identity within Christchurch as ‘Highcliffe’. It is diverse in character and lacks architectural homogeneity, with modern housing estates blending in with mature and established residential areas. Baseline data Highcliffe and Walkford Christchurch Borough Area of the ward 362 ha 5,043 ha Ward Population estimated mid 6,700 45,824 2008 Population Age Structure (2008 Mid-Year Estimates) 0 – 15 years 750 (11.2%) 7,223 (16%) 2 Christchurch and East Dorset Highcliffe Area Profile Highcliffe Area Profile 16 –59 (F) / 16 – 64 (M) 2,640 (39%) 22,969 (50%) 60 (F) 65 (M) + 3,310 (49%) 15,632 (34%) Deprivation Data Index of Multiple Deprivation There are 30 Super Output Christchurch Borough is (2007) Areas (SOAs) in Christchurch classified at 220 out of 354 and Highcliffe ward has 4 SOAs UA/districts nationwide. -
Notice of Election
NOTICE OF ELECTION Bournemouth, Christchurch & Poole Council Election of Councillors 1. Elections are to be held for Councillors to serve the Wards listed below. The number of Councillors to be elected is: Alderney & Bourne Valley 3 Bearwood & Merley 3 Boscombe East & Pokesdown 2 Boscombe West 2 Bournemouth Central 2 Broadstone 2 Burton & Grange 2 Canford Cliffs 2 Canford Heath 3 Christchurch Town 2 Commons 2 Creekmoor 2 East Cliff & Springbourne 3 East Southbourne & Tuckton 2 Hamworthy 3 Highcliffe & Walkford 2 Kinson 3 Littledown & Iford 2 Moordown 2 Mudeford Stanpit & West Highcliffe 2 Muscliff & Strouden Park 3 Newtown & Heatherlands 3 Oakdale 2 Parkstone 2 Penn Hill 2 Poole Town 3 Queens Park 2 Redhill & Northbourne 2 Talbot & Branksome Woods 3 Wallisdown & Winton West 2 West Southbourne 2 Westbourne & West Cliff 2 Winton East 2 2. Nomination papers for this election may be obtained from any of the Electoral Offices listed below. 3. Nomination papers must be delivered to the Returning Officer at any of the Electoral Offices listed below during normal office hours on any day after the date of this notice but no later than 4 pm on Wednesday, 3 April 2019. 4. If the election is contested the poll will take place on Thursday, 2 May 2019. 5. Applications to register to vote must reach the Electoral Registration Officer by 12 midnight on Friday 12 April 2019. 6. Applications, amendments or cancellations of postal votes must reach the Electoral Registration Officer at one of the Electoral Offices listed below by 5 pm on Monday, 15 April 2019. 7. Applications to vote by proxy at this election must reach the Electoral Registration Officer at one of the Electoral Offices listed below by 5 pm on Wednesday, 24 April 2019. -
Download Thesis
This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Aspects of British Electoral Politics 1867-1880 Bennett, David Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 Aspects of British Electoral Politics 1867-1880 by David C Bennett Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History, School of Arts and Humanities King’s College London, University of London March, 2014 © David C Bennett, 2014 1 Abstract This dissertation examines the development of electoral politics in Great Britain between 1868 and 1880. -
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council
8/8/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council Personal Details: Name: Mark Howell E-mail: [email protected] Postcode: Organisation Name: The Party for Poole People Ltd. (Poole People) Comment text: We strongly disagree with the proposed boundary between Oakdale, Parkstone and Poole Town wards. We believe that the Council's submission to the Commission was been a deliberate act of gerrymandering by the exclusively Conservative and secretly conducted sub-committee that generated it. The Poole People party is strong in central Poole, having two of the three councillors (including me), whereas Parkstone is traditionally Conservative. We believe that the Conservatives want to reduce the number of councillors in Poole Town ward to limit the Poole People party's chances of getting councillors elected. We expect the committee probably thought the natural Conservative majority in Parkstone would withstand the absorption of some Poole People voters. The Commission's published proposals varied the Council's submission by making Oakdale, not Parkstone, a three councillor ward. In its report it says "We agree with the Joint Committee that the Longfleet area should be represented in a single ward but consider that it is likely to relate better to Oakdale than to Parkstone. We therefore propose to include the area from Tatnam Road to the cricket ground in our Oakdale ward." We disagree with this statement because (a) the Commission's proposals do not incorporate all of Longfleet in Oakdale,as a significant chunk of Heckford Park remains in Poole Town ward; and (b) Longfleet residents have always looked towards the town centre and not Parkstone or Oakdale, and still do. -
Referendums Relating to Council Tax Increases (Alternative Notional Amounts) (England) Report 2019/20
Referendums Relating to Council Tax Increases (Alternative Notional Amounts) (England) Report 2019/20 HC 1917 Referendums Relating to Council Tax Increases (Alternative Notional Amounts) (England) Report 2019/20 Presented to the House of Commons pursuant to section 52ZE of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 as inserted by Schedule 5 to the Localism Act 2011 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 29 January 2019 HC 1917 © Crown copyright 2019 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Fry Building 2 Marsham Street London SW1P 4DF Telephone: 030 3444 0000 ISBN 978-1-5286-0987-6 CCS0119439024 01/19 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Referendums relating to Council Tax Increases (Alternative Notional Amounts) (England) Report 2019-2020 Introduction: legislative background 1. Under section 52ZB of the Local Government Finance Act 19921 (“the 1992 Act”) each billing authority, major precepting authority and local precepting authority2 in England is required to determine whether its relevant basic amount of council tax3 for a financial year (“the year under consideration”) is excessive. -
The Richmond Park By-Election in Perspective: Lessons from Liberal, Social Democrat and Liberal Democrat By-Election Gains
The Richmond Park By-Election in Perspective: Lessons from Liberal, Social Democrat and Liberal Democrat By-Election Gains Dr Seth Thévoz SLF Publications February 2017 1 Acknowledgements I would like to thank John and Rosemary Tilley, who read over an earlier draft of this work, and made a series of shrewd observations drawing on their expertise from 40 years of Liberal activity in south-west London. As ever, all errors and omissions remain very much my own. Pamphlets in this series: Lewis Baston and Seth Thévoz, Lib Dem Seats in 2010-5: Where Did the Votes Go? SLF Publications Number 1 (July 2015), 22pp. Simon Radford, Shouldn't We Listen to Those Who Predicted the Crash? SLF Publications Number 2 (August 2015), 12pp. Seth Thévoz, Electing the Lords: How Did That Work Out for the Lib Dems? A Study into the Effectiveness of the Interim Peers Panel System for Electing Liberal Democrat Nominees to the House of Lords, 1999-2015. SLF Publications Number 3 (September 2015), 28pp. Paul Pettinger, Why Centrism Doesn't Work for Minor Parties. SLF Publications Number 4 (April 2016), 18pp. Edward Robinson, The European Carbon Market isn’t Working — and Social Liberals Should be Worried. SLF Publications Number 5 (February 2017), 10pp. These titles — and other publications — can be freely downloaded from www.socialliberal.net/ The views and opinions expressed in this pamphlet are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent those of the Social Liberal Forum. ©Seth Thévoz, 2017. Published and promoted by Seth Thévoz on behalf of the Social Liberal Forum, both at Social Liberal Forum, MRG Building, 54 Commercial Street, London, E1 6LT. -
Christchurch Bay and Harbour Forum Study
Christchurch Bay and Harbour Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Study Technical Annex 9: Strategic Environmental Assessment Prepared by Halcrow Group Ltd Christchurch Bay and Harbour Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Study Technical Annex 9: Strategic Environmental Assessment Prepared by Halcrow Group Ltd Halcrow Maritime Burderop Park Swindon Wiltshire SN4 0QD Tel +44 (0)1793 812479 Fax +44 (0)1793 812089 www.halcrow.com Halcrow Maritime has prepared this report in accordance with the instructions of their client, Christchurch Coastal Group, for their sole and specific use. Any other persons who use any information contained herein do so at their own risk. © Halcrow Group Limited 2004 Christchurch Bay and Harbour Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Study Technical Annex 9: Strategic Environmental Assessment Contents Amendment Record This report has been issued and amended as follows: Issue Revision Description Date Signed 1 0 Draft Contents Non-Technical Summary Introduction 1 Existing Environment 1 Planning and Legislation 5 Consultation 6 Environmental Objectives 6 1 Introduction 1 1.1 General 1 1.2 Approach 1 1.3 Objectives 2 1.4 Format 2 2 Existing Environment 3 2.1 Sources of Information 3 2.2 Location and Character 3 2.3 Geology and Geomorphology 3 2.4 Ecology and Nature Conservation 5 2.5 Landscape 21 2.6 Land Use and Population 22 2.7 Transport Network and Traffic 25 2.8 Water and Aquatic Environment 25 2.9 Contaminated Land 30 2.10 Tourism and Recreation 31 2.11 Fisheries 35 2.12 Archaeology and Cultural