Species Concepts - Evolutionary Biology - Oxford Bibliographies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Species Concepts - Evolutionary Biology - Oxford Bibliographies Species Concepts - Evolutionary Biology - Oxford Bibliographies - http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-97801999417... Species Concepts Jody Hey Introduction In a general and nontechnical sense, species are kinds of organisms. But for naturalists, from at least the early days of the age of the Enlightenment (late 1600s) up to the present day, there has been uncertainty and debate about just what species are and how best to identify them. Questions about species are central to some of the oldest and most-discussed philosophical topics on the nature of kinds of things (i.e., categories or universals). Perhaps surprisingly, the advent of the theory of evolution in the mid-19th century only accelerated debates and discussion about species and did little to resolve some of the basic disputes, even as scientists came to understand how new species arose. The 20th and 21st centuries have seen extraordinary growth in scientific research on species diversity, as well as increasing conservation efforts to avoid species extinction in the face of habitat loss and other anthropogenic forces of environmental change. All of the research on speciation, and species discovery, and on conservation takes place amid ongoing discussions about how best to identify species. General Overviews Because of a large philosophical element, the literature on species concepts is unusually diverse for a biological topic. A great many sources, including those from biologists, are concerned with topics such as the role of definitions, operational versus conceptual ideas, and the reality of taxonomic groups. Because of the diversity of opinions held by biologists on questions about species, the only broad reviews on the topic are edited volumes. Mayr 1957 is the first edited volume to attempt to address the species problem in some breadth, both philosophically and in application. Slobodchikoff 1976 and Ereshefsky 1992 are useful edited volumes that contain a number of the important philosophical papers on the subject (some papers are in both volumes). Otte and Endler 1989; Claridge, et al. 1997; and Howard and Berlocher 1998 are edited volumes of original articles, written mostly from biological perspectives rather than philosophical ones, on basic questions about species in general and on questions that arise in particular empirical contexts. Wilson 1999 is a volume of original philosophical articles, some of which have gone on to be widely cited, and Wilkins 2009 is a compendium of terms and concepts, useful for parsing the philosophical literature. Claridge, M. F., H. A. Dawah, and M. R. Wilson, eds. 1997. Species: The units of biodiversity. Systematics Association Special Volume 54. London: Chapman & Hall. An edited volume with several very useful papers. The focus is largely on the practical aspects of species identification, rather than on philosophy or on the processes of speciation. Many articles address the practical issues that arise for species identification, in particular large taxonomic groups. Ereshefsky, M., ed. 1992. The units of evolution: Essays on the nature of species. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. An anthology of reprints of major, mostly philosophical, papers. 1 of 15 8/14/2014 9:32 AM Species Concepts - Evolutionary Biology - Oxford Bibliographies - http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-97801999417... Howard, D. J., and S. H. Berlocher, eds. 1998. Endless forms: Species and speciation. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. A volume of original papers covering diverse topics related to species and speciation. Mayr, E., ed. 1957. The species problem: A symposium presented at the Atlanta meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, December 28–29, 1955. AAAS Publication 50. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. A volume of original papers, with the first and last by Ernst Mayr promoting the biological species concept. Otte, D., and J. A. Endler, eds. 1989. Speciation and its consequences. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer. Although an edited volume with a broad scope, this book has a number of papers that became widely cited. The first section, with classic articles by Alan Templeton, Joel Cracraft, and Gareth Nelson, concerns species concepts directly, with the remainder of the book dwelling more on the speciation process. Slobodchikoff, C. N., ed. 1976. Concepts of species. Benchmark Papers in Systematic and Evolutionary Biology 3. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross. An anthology of reprints of major papers, many of them philosophical in nature. Wilkins, J. S. 2009. Defining species: A sourcebook from Antiquity to today. American University Studies V203. New York: Peter Lang. A terse encyclopedia covering the history of scientists and ideas relevant to questions about species. Wilson, R. A., ed. 1999. Species: New interdisciplinary essays. Bradford Book. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. A volume of original, mostly philosophical papers on the nature of species and the species problem. Aristotle, Taxonomy, and Essentialism The terms “species” and “genus” and their nested relationship (i.e., multiple species within a genus) come from Aristotle, who used them not just for living things but for many grouping problems as part of a general logical system of classification. Aristotle also said that each species has an essence that distinguishes it from other species. Ereshefsky 2001 and Mayr 1982 cover the history of how biologists came to use these terms as part of a nested (i.e., hierarchical) taxonomic system of classification, with the term “species” referring to the basal or bottommost taxonomic rank (in some contexts, even lower ranks such as subspecies are used). Cain 1958 tells the story of how the pioneering systematist Carolus Linnaeus adapted Aristotle’s system to biology, including Aristotle’s idea of essences. Mayr 1959, Hull 1965, and Mayr 1982 describe how Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution radically undermined essentialist ideas and replaced those ideas with a new outlook in which species do not have essences, and in which the variation among individuals is the raw material for the evolution of species. Hull 1965, drawing extensively from Ernst Mayr’s work, describes from a philosophical perspective the harmful impact of Aristotle’s essentialism on taxonomy. Winsor 2006 is highly critical of Mayr’s reading of history and of the story that biologists before Darwin were essentialist and were overly influenced by Aristotle and Plato. Cain, A. J. 1958. Logic and memory in Linnaeus’s system of taxonomy. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London 169.1–2: 2 of 15 8/14/2014 9:32 AM Species Concepts - Evolutionary Biology - Oxford Bibliographies - http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-97801999417... 144–163. A significant paper that makes the case that Linnaeus’s commitment to Aristotelian logic included a commitment to species essentialism. Ereshefsky, M. 2001. The poverty of the Linnaean hierarchy: A philosophical study of biological taxonomy. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. A useful review and interesting critique of the history of how we classify organisms. Hull, D. L. 1965. The effect of essentialism on taxonomy—two thousand years of stasis (I). British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15.60: 314–326. A widely cited paper that articulates the thesis that the Aristotelian view of species is essentialist and counterproductive. Mayr, E. 1959. Darwin and the evolutionary theory in biology. In Evolution and anthropology: A centennial appraisal. Edited by B. J. Meggars, 1–10. Washington, DC: Anthropological Society of Washington. This contains the earliest full articulation of Mayr’s thesis that Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection invoked a major change in biologists (and others), from viewing species as fixed types with essences to viewing species as lacking essences and within which variation is the raw material for evolutionary change. Mayr, E. 1976. Typological versus population thinking. In Evolution and the diversity of life: Selected essays. By E. Mayr, 26–29. Cambridge, MA: Belknap. A more complete and easier-to-find articulation of the ideas laid out in Mayr 1959. Mayr, E. 1982. The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Belknap. A philosophical and historical treatise on how biologists came to understand species, and on the impact of Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection on the way that scientists come to understand organisms and species. This book places Mayr’s earlier thesis, that the theory of evolution triggered a change in biologists’ view of species away from essentialism and toward an understanding of the role of variation, into a broad historical overview. Winsor, M. P. 2006. The creation of the essentialism story: An exercise in metahistory. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 28.2: 149–174. An important paper for understanding Mayr’s claims regarding the history of essentialism. Winsor and others have argued that Mayr overstates the case that biologists before Darwin were essentialist. The Origins of a Focus on Reproductive Barriers In partial contrast to the idea that an individual species exists as a kind of thing, with a unique essence, there stands the observable phenomenon that organisms usually reproduce with others of the same kind and bear offspring of the same kind. As the ancient idea that living things arose spontaneously from nonliving things was replaced with a recognition that all organisms
Recommended publications
  • Use of Genomic Resources to Assess Adaptive Divergence and Introgression in Oaks
    Review Use of Genomic Resources to Assess Adaptive Divergence and Introgression in Oaks Desanka Lazic 1 , Andrew L. Hipp 2 , John E. Carlson 3 and Oliver Gailing 1,4,* 1 Department of Forest Genetics and Forest Tree Breeding, Georg-August University of Göttingen, 37007 Göttingen, Germany; [email protected] 2 Center for Tree Science, The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, IL 60532, USA; [email protected] 3 The Schatz Center for Tree Molecular Genetics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA 16802, USA; [email protected] 4 Center for Integrated Breeding Research (CiBreed), Georg-August University of Göttingen, 37073 Göttingen, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Adaptive divergence is widely accepted as a contributor to speciation and the maintenance of species integrity. However, the mechanisms leading to reproductive isolation, the genes involved in adaptive divergence, and the traits that shape the adaptation of wild species to changes in climate are still largely unknown. In studying the role of ecological interactions and environment-driven selection, trees have emerged as potential model organisms because of their longevity and large genetic diversity, especially in natural habitats. Due to recurrent gene flow among species with different ecological preferences, oaks arose as early as the 1970s as a model for understanding how speciation can occur in the face of interspecific gene flow, and what we mean by “species” when geographically and genomically heterogeneous introgression seems to undermine species’ genetic Citation: Lazic, D.; Hipp, A.L.; coherence. In this review, we provide an overview of recent research into the genomic underpinnings Carlson, J.E.; Gailing, O.
    [Show full text]
  • Introgressive Hybridization and the Evolution of Lake-Adapted Catostomid Fishes
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Introgressive Hybridization and the Evolution of Lake-Adapted Catostomid Fishes Thomas E. Dowling1¤a*, Douglas F. Markle2, Greg J. Tranah3¤b, Evan W. Carson1¤c, David W. Wagman2¤d, Bernard P. May3 1 School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America, 2 Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America, 3 Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America ¤a Current address: Department of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit Michigan, United States of America ¤b Current address: California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America ¤c Current address: Biology Department and Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America ¤d Current address: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Newport, Oregon, United States of America * [email protected] OPEN ACCESS Citation: Dowling TE, Markle DF, Tranah GJ, Carson EW, Wagman DW, May BP (2016) Introgressive Abstract Hybridization and the Evolution of Lake-Adapted Catostomid Fishes. PLoS ONE 11(3): e0149884. Hybridization has been identified as a significant factor in the evolution of plants as groups doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149884 of interbreeding species retain their phenotypic integrity despite gene exchange among Editor: Filippos A. Aravanopoulos, Aristotle forms. Recent studies have identified similar interactions in animals; however, the role of University of Thessaloniki, GREECE hybridization in the evolution of animals has been contested. Here we examine patterns of Received: October 15, 2015 gene flow among four species of catostomid fishes from the Klamath and Rogue rivers using molecular and morphological traits.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of Workshop on Gene Conservation of Tree Species–Banking on the Future May 16–19, 2016, Holiday Inn Mart Plaza, Chicago, Illinois, USA
    United States Department of Agriculture Proceedings of Workshop on Gene Conservation of Tree Species–Banking on the Future May 16–19, 2016, Holiday Inn Mart Plaza, Chicago, Illinois, USA Forest Pacific Northwest General Technical Report September Service Research Station PNW-GTR-963 2017 Pacific Northwest Research Station Web site http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw Telephone (503) 808-2592 Publication requests (503) 808-2138 FAX (503) 808-2130 E-mail [email protected] Mailing address Publications Distribution Pacific Northwest Research Station P.O. Box 3890 Portland, OR 97208-3890 Disclaimer Papers were provided by the authors in camera-ready form for printing. Authors are responsible for the content and accuracy. Opinions expressed may not necessarily reflect the position of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.Department of Agriculture of any product or service. Technical Coordinators Richard A. Sniezko is center geneticist, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Dorena Genetic Resource Center, 34963 Shoreview Road, Cottage Grove, OR 97424 (e-mail address: [email protected]) Gary Man is a Forest health special- ist, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, State and Private Forestry, Forest Health Protection, 201 14th St SW 3rd FL CE, Washington DC 20024 (e-mail address: [email protected]) Valerie Hipkins is lab director, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, National Forest Genetics Laboratory, 2480 Carson Road, Placerville, CA 95667 (e-mail address: [email protected]) Keith Woeste is research geneti- cist, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Resource for a Better Understanding of the Complex Genetic Dynamics Within the Oak Syngameon Erwin Dreyer
    A new resource for a better understanding of the complex genetic dynamics within the oak syngameon Erwin Dreyer To cite this version: Erwin Dreyer. A new resource for a better understanding of the complex genetic dynamics within the oak syngameon. 2021, pp.100003. 10.24072/pci.forestwoodsci.100003. hal-03148302 HAL Id: hal-03148302 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03148302 Submitted on 22 Feb 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License A new resource for a better understanding of the complex genetic dynamics within the oak syngameon Erwin Dreyer based on reviews by Ricardo Alia, Komlan Avia, Oliver Brendel and Hilke Schröder A recommendation of: Tiange Lang, Pierre Abadie, Valérie Léger, Thibaut Decourcelle, Jean-Marc Frigerio, Christian Burban, Catherine Bodénès, Erwan Guichoux, Grégoire Le Provost, Cécile Robin, Open Access Naoki Tani, Patrick Léger, Camille Lepoittevin, Veronica A. El Mujtar, François Hubert, Josquin Tibbits, Jorge Paiva, Alain Franc, Frédéric Raspail, Stéphanie Mariette, Marie- Pierre Reviron, Christophe Plomion, Antoine Kremer, Marie-Laure Desprez-Loustau, Pauline Garnier-Géré. High-quality SNPs from genic regions highlight introgression patterns among European white oaks (Quercus petraea and Q.
    [Show full text]
  • An Updated Infrageneric Classification of the North American Oaks
    Article An Updated Infrageneric Classification of the North American Oaks (Quercus Subgenus Quercus): Review of the Contribution of Phylogenomic Data to Biogeography and Species Diversity Paul S. Manos 1,* and Andrew L. Hipp 2 1 Department of Biology, Duke University, 330 Bio Sci Bldg, Durham, NC 27708, USA 2 The Morton Arboretum, Center for Tree Science, 4100 Illinois 53, Lisle, IL 60532, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The oak flora of North America north of Mexico is both phylogenetically diverse and species-rich, including 92 species placed in five sections of subgenus Quercus, the oak clade centered on the Americas. Despite phylogenetic and taxonomic progress on the genus over the past 45 years, classification of species at the subsectional level remains unchanged since the early treatments by WL Trelease, AA Camus, and CH Muller. In recent work, we used a RAD-seq based phylogeny including 250 species sampled from throughout the Americas and Eurasia to reconstruct the timing and biogeography of the North American oak radiation. This work demonstrates that the North American oak flora comprises mostly regional species radiations with limited phylogenetic affinities to Mexican clades, and two sister group connections to Eurasia. Using this framework, we describe the regional patterns of oak diversity within North America and formally classify 62 species into nine major North American subsections within sections Lobatae (the red oaks) and Quercus (the Citation: Manos, P.S.; Hipp, A.L. An Quercus Updated Infrageneric Classification white oaks), the two largest sections of subgenus . We also distill emerging evolutionary and of the North American Oaks (Quercus biogeographic patterns based on the impact of phylogenomic data on the systematics of multiple Subgenus Quercus): Review of the species complexes and instances of hybridization.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosystematic Relationships and the Formation of Polyploids Buggs, RJA; Soltis, PS; Soltis, DE
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Queen Mary Research Online Biosystematic relationships and the formation of polyploids Buggs, RJA; Soltis, PS; Soltis, DE For additional information about this publication click this link. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/5981 Information about this research object was correct at the time of download; we occasionally make corrections to records, please therefore check the published record when citing. For more information contact [email protected] 1 Biosystematic relationships and the formation of polyploids Richard J. A. Buggs1,2, Pamela S. Soltis2,3, and Douglas E. Soltis1,3 1Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 2Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 3The Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL Running title: Biosystematic relationships and polyploidy Author email addresses: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 2 Abstract Since the discovery of polyploidy (the presence of more than two chromosome sets in a nucleus) a century ago, scientists have investigated and speculated about the factors which could promote polyploid formation. One of the oldest and most enduring ideas is that hybridization promotes whole genome doubling. First suggested by Ø. Winge, this concept was developed and refined by the major plant evolutionary biologists of the last century, and especially in the biosystematic thinking of J. Clausen, D. D. Keck and W. M. Hiesey. In the past few years, this issue has been revisited by various authors, using molecular systematic methods to study patterns of parental divergence in relation to the formation of polyploids.
    [Show full text]
  • Asexual Propagation of Bur Oak (Quercus Macrocarpa) Michaux By
    Asexual propagation of bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa) Michaux by Cheryl Louise Moore A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Plant Sciences Montana State University © Copyright by Cheryl Louise Moore (2003) Abstract: Seed orchards consisting of cloned superior parent trees are necessary to enable consistent propagation of trees with desirable traits. Cloning of superior trees for establishment of these seed orchards is typically accomplished by vegetative propagation. Because bur oak is a species well adapted for windbreaks in the northern plains, it would be desirable to establish a seed orchard from superior specimens, but bur oak cuttings are difficult to root. Superior 9-year-old trees from seed accessions were source plants for this study. In two greenhouse locations, hardwood cuttings were subjected to two media, two air temperatures, and nine concentrations of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) in either a talc or a distilled water base, and various environmental treatments. Hardwood cuttings did not root. For the softwood study, parent plants were subjected to one or a combination of treatments, including full or localized, light exclusion, banding, and/or hedging. Cuttings taken from these plants were treated with one of five DBA concentrations in a talc base. Cuttings were evaluated at 8 and 11 weeks for general health based on stem color, number of live leaves, petiole color, callus color and amount, and presence of roots. Highest rooting percentages in cuttings from plants that were hedged, etiolated and banded and treated with 2,500 ppm or 10,000 ppm DBA; hedging, etiolation and no-banding at 2,500 ppm IBA, and non-hedged, etiolated and not-banded at 10,000 ppm IBA.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Divergence and the Number of Hybridizing Species Affect the Path to Homoploid Hybrid Speciation
    Genetic divergence and the number of hybridizing species affect the path to homoploid hybrid speciation Aaron A. Comeaulta and Daniel R. Matutea,1 aBiology Department, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 Edited by David M. Hillis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, and approved August 16, 2018 (received for review June 6, 2018) Hybridization is often maladaptive and in some instances has led Comparative studies suggest one factor that is likely to affect to the loss of biodiversity. However, hybridization can also pro- the evolutionary consequence of hybridization: the amount of mote speciation, such as during homoploid hybrid speciation, genetic divergence between hybridizing taxa. For example, the thereby generating biodiversity. Despite examples of homoploid number and strength of genetic incompatibilities that segregate hybrid species, the importance of hybridization as a speciation in hybrid offspring tend to increase as genetic divergence in- mechanism is still widely debated, and we lack a general un- creases between their parental species (15, 16), and the pro- derstanding of the conditions most likely to generate homoploid duction of phenotypic novelties (i.e., transgressive phenotypes) hybrid species. Here we show that the level of genetic divergence has also been shown to increase with genetic divergence between between hybridizing species has a large effect on the probability hybridizing taxa (17, 18). As pertaining to hybrid species, that their hybrids evolve reproductive isolation. We find that Chapman and Burke (19) compared levels of genetic divergence populations of hybrids formed by parental species with interme- between the parental species of 12 homoploid hybrid species diate levels of divergence were more likely to mate assortatively, and 26 polyploid hybrid species and found that genetic di- and discriminate against their parental species, than those gener- vergence between the parents of homoploid hybrid species was ated from weakly or strongly diverged parental species.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Diversity and Differentiation Patterns in Micromeria from The
    Curto et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2017) 17:198 DOI 10.1186/s12862-017-1031-y RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Genetic diversity and differentiation patterns in Micromeria from the Canary Islands are congruent with multiple colonization dynamics and the establishment of species syngameons M. Curto1,2* , P. Puppo2, S. Kratschmer1 and H. Meimberg1 Abstract Background: Especially on islands closer to the mainland, such as the Canary Islands, different lineages that originated by multiple colonization events could have merged by hybridization, which then could have promoted radiation events (Herben et al., J Ecol 93: 572–575, 2005; Saunders and Gibson, J Ecol 93: 649–652, 2005; Caujapé-Castells, Jesters, red queens, boomerangs and surfers: a molecular outlook on the diversity of the Canarian endemic flora, 2011). This is an alternative to the scenario where evolution is mostly driven by drift (Silvertown, J Ecol 92: 168–173, 2004; Silvertown et al., J Ecol 93: 653–657, 2005). In the former case hybridization should be reflected in the genetic structure and diversity patterns of island species. In the present work we investigate Micromeria from the Canary Islands by extensively studying their phylogeographic pattern based on 15 microsatellite loci and 945 samples. These results are interpreted according to the hypotheses outlined above. Results: Genetic structure assessment allowed us to genetically differentiate most Micromeria species and supported their current classification. We found that populations on younger islands were significantly more genetically diverse and less differentiated than those on older islands. Moreover, we found that genetic distance on younger islands was in accordance with an isolation-by-distance pattern, while on the older islands this was not the case.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Morphological Studies
    On the species conceptionin relation to Taxonomy and Genetics by W.A. Goddijn (Leiden) A phylogenetic system resulting from comparative morphological studies claims to be the expression of evolution. The character of any phylogenetic classification based on morphological studies exclusively is a The speculative one. fragmental facts procured by fossil relicts from earlier geological periods are also morphological and allow only the con- clusion that evolution took place, but in which way changes evolved has not been stated by immediate observation. Nobody escapes from the idea that all living beings existing yet, have from those originated in the past. It is undeniable that the vege- tation which covered the earth in former periods has been changed. This historical process seen as a continuity possible by the power of re- production of the organisms is called evolution. The idea of evolution which of Darwinian as a consequence views penetrated into taxomony is cause of the fact that species, families, ordines, phyla were considered to be more than categoric divisions; they should represent relationships lines of descent. or Taxomony got a fundamental frame: phylogeny! idea that The higher organised (more complicated) beings should have risen from the lower organised (simple, or seemingly simple) ones mind is so plausible to human that a theory sufficiently adapted to this idea would be accepted natural and evident. In phylogeny the prin- of evolution from lower to ciple higher organisation is brought to ex- Plants and animals pression. surrounding us, as seen from a phylogenetic of point view, form the youngest shoots of a branching system but about the is the least.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny and Diversification History of Prosopis
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CONICET Digital Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2008, 93, 621–640. With 6 figures Molecular phylogeny and diversification history of Prosopis (Fabaceae: Mimosoideae) SANTIAGO ANDRÉS CATALANO1*, JUAN CÉSAR VILARDI1, DANIELA TOSTO1,2 and BEATRIZ OFELIA SAIDMAN1 1Departamento de Ecología Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Intendente Güiraldes 2160, Ciudad Universitaria, C1428EGA - Capital Federal, Argentina. 2Instituto de Biotecnología, CICVyA INTA Castelar, CC 25 Castelar 1712, Argentina Received 29 December 2006; accepted for publication 31 May 2007 The genus Prosopis is an important member of arid and semiarid environments around the world. To study Prosopis diversification and evolution, a combined approach including molecular phylogeny, molecular dating, and character optimization analysis was applied. Phylogenetic relationships were inferred from five different molecular markers (matK-trnK, trnL-trnF, trnS-psbC, G3pdh, NIA). Taxon sampling involved a total of 30 Prosopis species that represented all Sections and Series and the complete geographical range of the genus. The results suggest that Prosopis is not a natural group. Molecular dating analysis indicates that the divergence between Section Strombocarpa and Section Algarobia plus Section Monilicarpa occurred in the Oligocene, contrasting with a much recent diversification (Late Miocene) within each of these groups. The diversification of the group formed by species of Series Chilenses, Pallidae, and Ruscifoliae is inferred to have started in the Pliocene, showing a high diversification rate. The moment of diversification within the major lineages of American species of Prosopis is coincident with the spreading of arid areas in the Americas, suggesting a climatic control for diversification of the group.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetics of Rare Acropora Species
    Molecular phylogenetics of geographically restricted Acropora species: Implications for threatened species conservation Richards ZT1*, Miller DJ2 and Wallace CC3 1. Aquatic Zoology, Western Australian Museum, 49 Kew Street, Welshpool, WA, Australia, 6106. 2. ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia, 4814. 3. Museum of Tropical Queensland, 74 Flinders Street, Townsville, Australia, 4814. *Corresponding Author - [email protected] Abstract To better understand the underlying causes of rarity and extinction risk in Acropora (staghorn coral), we contrast the minimum divergence ages and nucleotide diversity of an array of species with different range sizes and categories of threatened status. Time-calibrated Bayesian analyses based upon concatenated nuclear and mitochondrial sequence data implied contemporary range size and vulnerability are liked to species age. However, contrary to the popular belief based upon morphological features that geographically restricted Acropora species evolved in the Plio- Pleistocene, the molecular phylogeny depicts some species restricted to the Indo-Australian Archipelago have greater antiquity, diverging in the Miocene. Species age is not related to range size as a simple positive linear function and interpreting the precise tempo of evolution in this genus is greatly complicated by morphological homoplasy and a sparse fossil record. Our phylogenetic reconstructions provide new examples of how morphology conceals cryptic evolutionary relationships in the genus Acropora, and offers limited support for the species groupings currently used in Acropora systematics. We hypothesize that in addition to age, other mechanisms (such as a reticulate ancestry) delimit the contemporary range of some Acropora species, as evidenced by the complex patterns of allele sharing and paraphyly we uncover.
    [Show full text]