DOCSLIB.ORG

'Collaborative Competition': Stance-Taking and Positioning in the European Parliament

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
'Collaborative Competition': Stance-Taking and Positioning in the European Parliament ‘Collaborative Competition’ Stance-taking and Positioning in the European Parliament Nazlı Avdan Linköping Studies in Arts and Science No. 719 Studies in Language and Culture No. 29 Faculty of Arts and Sciences Linköping 2017 Linköping Studies in Arts and Science No. 719 At the Faculty of Arts and Sciences at Linköping University, research and doctoral studies are carried out within broad problem areas. Research is organized in interdisciplinary research environments and doctoral studies mainly in graduate schools. Jointly, they publish the series Linköping Studies in Arts and Science. This thesis comes from the Graduate School in Language and Culture in Europe at the Department of Culture and Communication. Distributed by: Department of Culture and Communication Linköping University SE-581 83 Linköping Nazlı Avdan ’Collaborative Competition’ Stance-taking and Positioning in the European Parliament Edition 1:1 ISBN 978-91-7685-493-8 ISSN 0282-9800 Studies in Language and Culture No. 29 ãNazli E. Avdan Department of Culture and Communication, 2017 Cover image: Redmer Hoekstra With the artist’s permission Cover layout: Martin Pettersson Printed in Sweden by LiU-Tryck, Linköping, Sweden, 2017 To Tayfun Table of Contents List of Tables .......................................................................................................... v List of Figures ....................................................................................................... vii List of Abbreviations .............................................................................................. ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................... xi ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................... xiii Chapter 1 Introduction ........................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of the Study ............................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Target Audiences ................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Outline of the Study .............................................................................................................. 4 Chapter 2 Data and Methodological FraMeworks ................................................... 7 2.1 The Data ................................................................................................................................ 7 2.1.1 The Corpus ............................................................................................................................. 7 2.1.2 Why Questions? ................................................................................................................... 12 2.1.3 Narrowing down the Scope of the Research ....................................................................... 12 2.1.4 Ethical Considerations ......................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Research Design .................................................................................................................. 14 2.3 Presentation of the Data ...................................................................................................... 15 Chapter 3 Setting the Scene .................................................................................. 17 3.1 Historical Background .......................................................................................................... 17 3.1.1 The European Ideal .............................................................................................................. 17 3.1.2 Competing Projects for a Future Europe ............................................................................. 19 3.1.3 Sovereign Debt Crisis ........................................................................................................... 19 3.1.4 The Time-line of the Institutional Collaboration in Europe ................................................. 21 3.2 The Macro Scene ................................................................................................................. 23 3.3 Institutional Frame .............................................................................................................. 24 3.3.1 The EP Organization ............................................................................................................. 24 3.3.2 Multilingualism in the European Parliament ....................................................................... 25 3.3.3 How Plenary Works ............................................................................................................. 25 3.3.4 Participants .......................................................................................................................... 26 Chapter 4 Approaches to ParliaMentary Debate ................................................... 27 4.1 Previous Research ............................................................................................................... 27 4.2 From ‘Genre’ to ‘ComMunicative Activity Type’ ................................................................... 29 4.2.1 Debate as a Parliamentary Communicative Activity ............................................................ 30 4.2.2 Communicative Procedures in the EP .................................................................................. 31 The President's Opening Speech ............................................................................................................. 32 Debriefing from the EU Presidents ......................................................................................................... 32 Scheduled Speeches ................................................................................................................................ 32 One-minute Speeches .............................................................................................................................. 32 Personal Statements ................................................................................................................................ 32 Blue-Card Procedure ............................................................................................................................... 33 4.2.3 Features of the Blue-card Q&A Procedure .......................................................................... 34 4.3 Sequential Organization and Turn-taking SysteM in the Blue-card Procedure ...................... 36 Chapter 5 Theoretical Approaches ........................................................................ 39 5.1 Constructivist Approach ...................................................................................................... 39 5.2 Focus on Groupings and Intergroup Behaviour .................................................................... 40 i Chapter 6 Conceptual FraMework ........................................................................ 43 6.1 Grouping ............................................................................................................................. 43 6.2 Grounding ........................................................................................................................... 44 6.3 Positioning .......................................................................................................................... 48 6.3.1 Intergroup Positioning ......................................................................................................... 53 6.3.2 Tracing Intergroup Relations in Statements by Individuals ................................................. 54 6.4 Stance ................................................................................................................................. 55 6.4.1 Du Bois’s Stance Triangle ..................................................................................................... 57 6.4.2 Stance Categories ................................................................................................................ 58 Evaluative Stance .................................................................................................................................. 58 Affective Stance ..................................................................................................................................... 58 Epistemic Stance ................................................................................................................................... 59 6.5 Alignment ............................................................................................................................ 61 6.6 Concluding ReMarks ............................................................................................................ 62 Chapter 7 Addressing ........................................................................................... 63 7.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 63 7.2 Analytical Approaches to Address ........................................................................................ 64 7.3 Research on Parliamentary ForMs of Address ...................................................................... 65 7.4 Procedural Identification of Addressee
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Letter to the Commission Regarding Printers Voluntary Agreement
    Brussels, Wednesday 26th of May To: Mr Virginijus Sinkevičius, European Commissioner for Environment, Oceans and Fisheries Mr Thierry Breton, European Commissioner for the Internal Market Mr Frans Timmermans, European Commission Executive Vice-President for the European Green Deal We urge the European Commission to keep its promises and propose a regulatory measure addressing the durability and repairability of printers as well as the reusability of cartridges as part of the forthcoming Circular Electronics Initiative. And we ask that the Commission rejects the proposed voluntary agreement drafted by manufacturers. The Commission's flagship Circular Economy Action Plan, adopted in March 2020, has set out to address the entire life cycle of products and tackle their premature obsolescence notably by promoting the right to repair for ICT products. In addition to mobile phones, laptops and tablets, the Plan has rightfully identified printers as a particularly wasteful product category, and has included a commitment to tackle them by means of a dedicated regulatory instrument “unless the sector reaches an ambitious voluntary agreement” by September 2020. Nearly one year later, the discussions on the voluntary agreement have not yielded any tangible results. Voluntary approaches clearly do not work. We need strong regulatory action now. We are extremely concerned by this situation. Not only because of the negative impacts of short-lived printers on the environment and on consumers but also because we are witnessing promises made being walked back on. Printers are one of the most iconic examples of premature obsolescence. Our analysis of printers in use today suggests that over 80% of them have been in use for less than 3 years, and only about 4% have been in use for 5 years or longer.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Benefits of Europe
    Local Benefits of Europe 1 European Green Party Rue Wiertz 31, 1050 Brussels – Belgium [email protected] Funded by the European Parliament. Sole liability remains with the author. Printed in Brussels, Belgium on recycled paper Designed by Mijuro © 2018 DEAR FRIENDS European politics have a signifi cant Evelyne Huytebroeck influence on the lives of people at the (Member of the EGP Committee) local level. In many EU Member States, the local elections are held simulta- neously with the European elections providing a huge opportunity to link the two election campaigns. Against this background, we would like to provide you with some practical background material and answer your questions on how European decisions in various policy areas influence your municipality by means of this booklet ‘Local Benefi ts of Europe’. This booklet is based on a work that was done by the German Greens lead by Anna Cavazzini and Reinhard Bütikofer. The information can also help you prepare for your local election programmes or campaigns. We place particular emphasis on how the people in your community benefi t practically from Europe, ranging from (Secretary General EGP) environmental protection to structural Mar Garcia policy, and what the Greens in Europe have achieved for European communi- ties. If you need more information on a spe- cifi c topic - no problem: in each chapter, you will fi nd a contact person who has contributed to this handbook and can answer your questions. We hope that this handbook will help you to prepare for the upcoming Euro- pean and local elections. Best regards 1. How do cities and municipalities benefi t from Europe? 5 1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Teachers Module 6 - European Parliament Role Play Game
    GUIDELINES FOR TEACHERS MODULE 6 - EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ROLE PLAY GAME This role play game puts your pupils in the shoes of a Member of the European Parliament. For one to two hours, your classroom becomes the European Parliament itself, and your pupils discuss how they would tackle current EU topics like global warming, tobacco rules and an EU army. This role play game will help your pupils to develop their democratic skills. These skills include developing a critical opinion, debating skills and learning to make compromises. First, pupils work in smaller groups - parliamentary committees - on a legislative proposal from the European Commission. They use a game board with thematic cards. While amending the legislative proposal, they must take into account the different points of view of the Council of the European Union and other stakeholders. There are five topics to choose from, of different difficulty levels. Second, there is a plenary debate in class, where the groups present their adapted laws. This is followed by a class vote. Finally, there is a thorough debriefing and evaluation of the role play game, pointing out the similarities and differences between the classroom exercise and reality. METHODOLOGY DURATION MATERIALS Role play game: work 25 mins - Game board for each group in parliamentary committees - Worksheet for each group - Set of theme cards for each group. The cards need to be printed on one side and cut out. - Thematic legislative proposal of the European Commission for each group. Role play game: 10 mins per - Blackboard/flipchart + chalk/marker plenary debate and theme vote - Filled-in worksheet for each group Debriefing and 15 mins to 1 - Computer + projector evaluation hour - Presentation of part 6 Disclaimer Neither the form nor the content of this exercise offer a complete and correct representation of reality, nor do they represent the actual points of view of the European Parliament, the European Commission, the Council of the European Union or the lobby groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution Template
    RESOLUTION BOOKLET September 30th – October 8th Zagreb, Croatia September 30th – October 8th | Zagreb, Croatia The 68th International Session was supported by: This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. 2 September 30th – October 8th | Zagreb, Croatia Programme of the General Assembly Friday, October 7th 2011 Opening of General Assembly 1. Committee on Employment and Social Affairs Coffee Break 2. Committee on Human Rights 3. Committee on Internal Markets and Consumer Affairs 4. Committee on Culture and Education II Lunch 5. Committee on Industry, Trade, Research and Energy I 6. Committee on Foreign Affairs II Coffee Break 7. Committee on Security and Defence 8. Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs Saturday, October 8th 2011 1. Committee on Civil Liberties and Home Affairs 2. Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Coffee Break 3. Committee on Crisis 4. Committee on Culture and Education I 5. Committee on Development Lunch 6. Committee on Industry Research and Energy II 7. Committee on Foreign Affairs I 3 September 30th – October 8th | Zagreb, Croatia Procedure of the General Assembly General rules The wish to speak is indicated by raising the committee placard. The authority of the board is absolute. Procedure and time settings Presenting of the motion for the resolution (amendments, operative clauses) Points of information 3 minutes to explain the motion for the resolution 3 minutes to respond on the motion for the resolution Open debate 3 minutes to sum-up the debate Voting procedure Announcing the votes Friendly amendment A friendly amendment is a last minute modifications of a resolution in order to improve it.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Campaign to End the Siege on Gaza (ECESG) Is an Anti-Israel, Pro-Hamas Umbrella Organization Which Participated in the Mavi Marmara Flotilla
    The Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center October 5, 2010 The European Campaign to End the Siege on Gaza (ECESG) is an anti-Israel, pro-Hamas umbrella organization which participated in the Mavi Marmara flotilla. The ECESG is currently involved in organizing an upgraded flotilla, and in other projects to further isolate Israel, part of the campaign to delegitimize it. The Sfendoni 8000, the ECESG's vessel in the Mavi Marmara flotilla. The number refers to the 8000 Palestinian terrorists detained by Israel. 253-10 2 Overview 1. The European Campaign to End the Siege on Gaza (ECESG) is an anti-Israel, pro Hamas umbrella organization operating in Europe. It participated in the last flotilla (which ended with a violent confrontation aboard the Mavi Marmara) along with a coalition of four other anti-Israel organizations led by the Turkish IHH. Since then the ECESG and the other coalition members have been intensively promoting new programs with the objective of embarrassing Israel and deepening its isolation. The coalition projects include an upgraded flotilla which has been organizing for several months as Freedom Fleet 2 (its organizers hope to include more than 20 ships from various countries), and sending a plane to the Gaza Strip. 2. The ECESG was founded in 2007, the same year as Hamas' violent takeover of the Fatah and Palestinian Authority institutions in the Gaza Strip. Its declared objectives are "the complete lifting" of the so-called Israeli "siege" of the Gaza Strip and bringing humanitarian assistance to its residents. However, beyond that goal, which is supported by Western human rights organizations and activists, lie hidden its undeclared political objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • We Need a European Response to Fight Against the Consequences of the COVID-19
    © Photo European Parliament en Publication | 16.03.2020 We need a European response to fight against the consequences of the COVID-19 Open letter to the Eurogroup Dear members of the Eurogroup, The Coronavirus pandemic has created a state of emergency in Europe, which needs a coordinated and ambitious response. According to the latest forecast by the European Commission, the European economy is expected to rapidly fall into recession that may be extremely severe if the policy response is not appropriate. There is no time to waste if we want avoid a repeating the mistakes made in the context global financial and subsequent euro area crises. The EU economy never fully recovered from the previous meltdown and was already in a weak position to meet the current challenges. A certain number of required targeted measures have already been announced by the European Central Bank, the Commission and several Member States to mitigate the economic impact of the outbreak. The ECB decided to increment its substantial monetary policy stimulus already in place. The Commission will implement the flexibilities foreseen in the Stability and Growth Pact and reorient unspent EU funds. Most Member States are in the process of adopting policies providing financial support and tax deferrals to companies. Moreover,the Single Supervisory Mechanism with the support of the European Banking Authority will provide temporary capital and operational relief to the banks. It is also worrying that instead of integrating economic shocks such as an epidemic outbreak in banking stress, such tests are postponed sine die. Having all these considerations in mind and recognising that the already announced measures represent steps in the good direction, the response cannot simply be based on policies adopted by Member States with supportive measures at the EU level, even if these are meaningful.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the European Parliament Mr Janusz
    Members of the European Parliament Mr Janusz Wojciechowski Commissioner for Agriculture European Commission Rue de la Loi 200 B-1049 Bruxelles Mr Virginijus Sinkevičius Commissioner for Environment, Oceans and Fisheries European Commission Rue de la Loi 200 B-1049 Bruxelles Brussels, 11 November 2020 Subject: Deforestation and illegal logging of Romania’s primary forests Dear Commissioners, we, the undersigned Members of the European Parliament, are addressing you to express our deep concerns about massive violations of the protection of Natura 2000 areas, primary and ancient forests and UNESCO World Heritage Sites in Romania. In Romania, deforestation caused by illegal logging is continuing on an alarming scale. It threatens the last and irreplaceable primary forests in the EU, which are more crucial than ever in the fight against climate change and for the preservation of biodiversity. According to expert estimates, up to two thirds of the EU’s remaining primary forests are located in Romania. Largely untouched areas in the Romanian Carpathian Mountains and the Făgăraș Mountains have survived until today – a European if not global heritage of invaluable ecological value. Some of these forests are also included in the List of World Heritage Sites UNESCO.1 Now, ruthless greed and large-scale corruption are seriously endangering these European natural treasures and the time for protective measures is running out. If no immediate action is taken, the still existing forests will soon be lost forever. Since the launch of the European Commission’s infringement procedure against Romania on 12 February 2020 for failing to establish effective measures against illegal logging2, thousands more hectares were destroyed.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe and Brazil Working Together
    EUROPE AND BRAZIL WORKING TOGETHER is a non-profit-making association created with the aim of supporting the development of successful business relations between the European Union and Brazil, and at the same time promoting political and cultural links between the two partners. MAJOR EUBrasil ACTIVITIES MAJOR EUBrasil OBJECTIVES • To create the EUBrasil Business Round Table where top political and economic actors, • To promote a strong and harmonious bilateral European and Brazilian, may meet and debate dialogue between economic and political actors issues of mutual interest. in Brazil and the EU. • To analyze the evolution of the bilateral dialogue • To seek out solutions to overcome the structural and to propose new measures to enhance obstacles inherent in relations between co-operation between the two communities. the EU and Brazil. • To create a strong network of associations of • To promote economic, cultural and social professionals and experts, European and Brazilian, co-operation. concerned with, or interested in, promoting bilateral • To support governmental initiatives for co-operation. the establishment of an Association Agreement, • To promote common plans in order to benefit and the creation of a free trade zone between from European co-operation initiatives and the EU and Mercosur. in particular those regarding research and • To develop political communication aimed development. at promoting Brazilian interests in the EU and vice versa. EUBrasil contributes to enhancing the bilateral dialogue between the two partners by, among other measures, establishing a communication forum that brings together all the interested stakeholders, and by promoting bilateral meetings and co-operation initiatives at various levels. It is my conviction that EUBrasil has all the potential “ to become a pillar in the relations between Europe and Brazil.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Amicus Curiae of the Senate of the United Mexican States, Et
    No. 08-987 IN THE RUBEN CAMPA, RENE GONZALEZ, ANTONIO GUERRERO, GERARDO HERNANDEZ, AND LUIS MEDINA, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI ON BEHALF OF THE SENATE OF THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES, THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF PANAMA, MARY ROBINSON (UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, 1997- 2002; PRESIDENT OF IRELAND, 1992-1997) AND LEGISLATORS FROM THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNTRIES OF BRAZIL, BELGIUM, CHILE, GERMANY, IRELAND, JAPAN, MEXICO, SCOTLAND AND THE UNITED KINGDOM ______________ Michael Avery Counsel of Record Suffolk Law School 120 Tremont Street Boston, MA 02108 617-573-8551 ii AMICI CURIAE The Senate of the United Mexican States The National Assembly of Panama Mary Robinson (United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, 1997-2002; President of Ireland, 1992-1997) Legislators from the European Parliament Josep Borrell Fontelles, former President Enrique Barón Crespo, former President Miguel Ángel Martínez, Vice-President Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Vice-President Luisa Morgantini, Vice-President Mia De Vits, Quaestor Jo Leinen, Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs Richard Howitt, Vice-Chair of the Subcommittee on Human Rights Guisto Catania, Vice-Chair of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Willy Meyer Pleite, Vice-Chair of the Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly Edite Estrela, Vice-Chair
    [Show full text]
  • Erlan Idrissov, Chairman of the Kazakhstan
    +21°C / +9°C WEDNESDAY, JULY 16, 2014 No 13 (56) www.astanatimes.com National museum of Kazakhstan opens With Government presidential Speech, international Visitors Approves General Gasification Scheme By Kulpash Konyrova duced gas – 25 billion cubic me- tres – will be used for re-injection ASTANA – “The Kazakh govern- to maintain the necessary pressure ment has approved a general scheme to extract oil from oil reservoirs, for the gasification of the country. the minister said, which is why pro- This policy document defines eco- duction volumes of usable gas will nomically sound strategic directions reach 21 billion cubic metres per to ensure reliable gas supply to con- year by 2030. sumers,” Minister of Oil and Gas “According to the forecast, in Uzakbai Karabalin said on June 24. 2030, the largest consumers of com- The new plan is intended to in- mercial gas will be industrial en- The National Museum of Kazakhstan crease gas production, consump- terprises and enterprises in the fuel Temporary exhibits of archival pho- tion and transportation, including and energy complex, [at] 31 and 40 tos and felt clothing were also among through building new pipelines, percent, respectively. Many of these the exhibitions on opening day. over the next 15 years. companies are included in the State As for the museum itself, Simp- Over the past 20 years, oil produc- Programme of Accelerated Indus- son said, “It’s very dramatic. It’s tion in Kazakhstan has more than tri- trial and Innovative Development monumental. It’s right in the mid- pled and gas production has grown (SPAIID),” said Karabalin.
    [Show full text]
  • European Alliance for a Green Recovery
    Launch of the European alliance for a Green Recovery Press Release Under embargo until 14/04 7:00am At the initiative of Pascal Canfin, Chair of the Environment Committee at the European Parliament, 180 political decision-makers, business leaders, trade unions, NGOs, and think tanks have come together to form a European alliance for a Green Recovery. In the face of the coronavirus crisis, the biggest challenge Europe has faced in peacetime, with devastating consequences and a shock to the economy tougher than the 2008 crisis, Ministers from 11 countries, 79 cross-party MEPs from 17 Member States, 37 CEOs, 28 business associations representing 10 different sectors, trade union confederation representing members from 90 national trade union organisations and 10 trade union federations, 7 NGOs and 6 think tanks, have committed to working together to create, support and implement solutions to prepare our economies for the world of tomorrow. This first pan-European call for mobilisation on post-crisis green investment packages will work to build the recovery and transformation plans which enshrine the fight against climate change and biodiversity as a key pillar of the economic strategy. Sharing the belief that the economic recovery will only come with massive investments to protect and create jobs and to support all companies, regions and sectors that have suffered from the economy coming to a sudden halt, the alliance commits to contribute to the post-crisis investment decisions needed to reboot and reboost our economy. Covid-19 will not make climate change and nature degradation go away. The fight against this crisis will not be won without a solid economic response.
    [Show full text]