Parasitization of the Sugarcane Aphid, Melanaphis Sacchari, by Commercially Available Aphid Parasitoids

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parasitization of the Sugarcane Aphid, Melanaphis Sacchari, by Commercially Available Aphid Parasitoids Parasitization of the sugarcane aphid, Melanaphis sacchari, by commercially available aphid parasitoids Nathan H. Mercer, Ricardo T. Bessin & John J. Obrycki BioControl Journal of the International Organization for Biological Control ISSN 1386-6141 BioControl DOI 10.1007/s10526-020-10051-w 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC). This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self-archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy BioControl https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-020-10051-w (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,-volV) Parasitization of the sugarcane aphid, Melanaphis sacchari, by commercially available aphid parasitoids Nathan H. Mercer . Ricardo T. Bessin . John J. Obrycki Received: 7 May 2020 / Accepted: 11 September 2020 Ó International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC) 2020 Abstract Identification of natural enemies of novel (purchased adults) and the F1 generation (reared from pests is important for the development of effective M. sacchari). Host suitability was evaluated by integrated pest management. Commercially available transferring M. sacchari from host acceptance trials parasitoids used for control of arthropod pests have to caged sweet sorghum plants. Cages were monitored potential for enhancing biological control of invasive for aphid mummies and emerged adult parasitoids. pests. The sugarcane aphid, Melanaphis sacchari Parental A. colemani produced the most mummies and (Hemiptera: Aphididae), is a new pest on sweet adult parasitoids and reduced final M. sacchari sorghum, Sorghum bicolor, in the USA. Surveys of numbers by 75%. A. ervi had a similar impact on M. M. sacchari have not detected any parasitoids in sacchari populations but produced fewer mummies central Kentucky. In North America, Aphelinus and adults. A. matricariae and A. abdominalis did not abdominalis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), Aphidius reduce M. sacchari populations. F1 parasitoids pro- ervi (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), Aphidius colemani, duced few adults and did not reduce M. sacchari and Aphidius matricariae are sold for aphid manage- populations. A. colemani demonstrated potential for ment. This study’s objective was to determine the host field releases with the ability to use M. sacchari as a acceptance and suitability of M. sacchari for these host and reduce aphid population growth. parasitoid species. Host acceptance was assessed by counting attacks and oviposition strikes by parasitoids Keywords Parasitoid wasp Á Host acceptance Á Host on M. sacchari. All parasitoid species accepted M. suitability Á Hemiptera Á Aphididae Á Hymenoptera sacchari as a host in the parental generation Handling Editor: Stefano Colazza. Introduction N. H. Mercer (&) Á R. T. Bessin Á J. J. Obrycki As new insect pests emerge, identifying natural Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, enemies for biological control is critical. Classical Agriculture Science Center North, Lexington, KY 40546, USA biological control could provide the ideal parasitoid- e-mail: [email protected] host match for a new invasive pest, however, this R. T. Bessin requires surveys in the pest’s native region, non-target e-mail: [email protected] assessment and legal approval (van Lenteren et al. J. J. Obrycki 2006; de Clercq et al. 2011). Fortunately, mass-reared e-mail: [email protected] aphid parasitoids are available, and can be used in 123 Author's personal copy N. H. Mercer et al. augmentative releases to manage aphid pests, e.g., occasional pest of sugarcane since the 1970s (Den- Aphidius colemani Viereck (Hymenoptera: Bra- mark 1988). In 2013, a new genotype of M. sacchari conidae) for Myzus persicae Sulzer (Hemiptera: was found infesting grain, forage, and sweet sorghum Aphididae) (Vasquez et al. 2006)orAphidius ervi in the southern USA (Nibouche et al. 2018), resulting Haliday for Aulacorthum solani Kaltenbach (Hemi- in major crop losses (Bowling et al. 2016; Brewer et al. ptera: Aphididae) (La-Spina et al. 2019). In North 2017). M. sacchari reached Kentucky in 2015, where America, four species of aphid parasitoids are used for it infested sweet sorghum fields and caused crop augmentative releases: Aphelinus abdominalis Dal- failures and yield losses (Villanueva 2016). Sweet man (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), A. colemani, A. sorghum is predominately grown for syrup and is an ervi, and Aphidius matricariae Haliday. The four important crop in Kentucky, worth an estimated species have relatively broad host ranges, spanning 18, $16–27 million yearly (R. Bessin, personal observa- 12, ten and nine aphid genera for A. abdominalis, A. tion). Once established on sorghum, M. sacchari colemani, A. ervi and A. matricariae, respectively populations can increase rapidly and reduce sugar (Stary et al. 1993; Japoshvili and Abrantes 2006; concentrations. A single aphid can produce 98 nymphs Tomanovic´ et al. 2009). Prior to recommending during their 2–5 week adult life span (Hinson 2017). augmentative releases of these parasitoids, testing to Management recommendations for M. sacchari in demonstrate their effectiveness at managing the target Kentucky sweet sorghum are limited. Chemical rec- pest is required. ommendations include insecticidal soap or flupyrad- The first step to determine the viability of a ifurone (SivantoÒ Prime, Bayer CropScience, parasitoid species for augmentative biological control Leverkusen, Germany), which is currently only avail- of a new aphid pest species is to determine host able under an emergency exemption. Cultural man- acceptance and host suitability for the parasitoid. Host agement practices include early planting and acceptance is defined as the parasitoid choosing to harvesting prior to the development of large M. oviposit in the aphid (Vinson 1976), and host sacchari infestations in the latter half of the sweet suitability is defined as the successful development sorghum growing season. M. sacchari is attacked by a of parasitoids in the aphid host (Vinson and Iwantsch variety of natural enemies (Maxson et al. 2019). 1980). Host acceptance can be influenced by several Aphelinus nigritus Foerster (Hymenoptera: Aphelin- factors, including host plant, visual stimuli, olfactory idae) and Lysiphlebus testaceipes Cresson (Hy- cues and cues detected by the ovipositor upon menoptera: Braconidae) are two parasitoid species insertion into the potential host (Vinson 1976; Mess- which attack M. sacchari in the USA (Maxson et al. ing and Rabasse 1995; Larocca et al. 2007). Once an 2019), neither are commercially avaliable. Although egg has been laid within a host, parasitoid develop- both L. testaceipes and the Aphelinus varipes species ment (host suitability) can depend on the host’s complex (which includes A. nigritus) (Wharton 1983) immune response, endosymbionts, nutritional state occur in Kentucky, USA (Lenhart and White 2017), and age (Vinson and Iwantsch 1980; Cayetano and M. sacchari mummies have only been observed in Vorburger 2015). High host acceptance and suitability western Kentucky (R. Villanueva, personal commu- can enable parasitoids to persist for multiple genera- nication). M. sacchari is believed to originate from tions and increase their value as biological control Asia (Nibouche et al. 2018) where it is attacked by agents. The host species used to rear parasitoids in several parasitoids (Singh et al. 2004). commercial insectaries is unlikely to be the same Existing host records for the four commercially species as the pest they are purchased to control. available aphid parasitoids show promise for their Second generation parasitoids reared on the target pest ability to parasitize M. sacchari. Many naturally species may differ from their parents in their fitness, occurring parasitoids including A. colemani and A. host acceptance and suitability (Pennacchio et al. ervi parasitize M. sacchari in the central Mexican state 1994; Henry et al. 2008). of Guanajuato (Salas-Araiza et al. 2017), but a survey The sugarcane aphid, Melanaphis sacchari Zehnt- in Coahuila, Mexico (which borders the USA) found ner (Hemiptera: Aphididae), is a cosmopolitan pest only L. testaceipes and A. nigritus (Garcı´a-Gonza´lez that feeds on several genera of grasses (Singh et al. et al. 2018). A. abdominalis and A. matricariae are not 2004). M. sacchari has been present in the USA as an known to attack aphids in the genus Melanaphis, but 123 Author's personal copy Parasitization of the sugarcane aphid, Melanaphis sacchari, by commercially available aphid… do have hosts within the same sub-tribe (Rhopalosi- 24 h. Host suitability of M. sacchari for each phina) (Kavallieratos et al. 2004; Japoshvili and treatment was assessed with aphids from host accep- Abrantes 2006; Kim and Lee 2008). Parasitoids are tance trials. These aphids were monitored for devel- an important part of aphid population suppression opment of mummies and emergence of adult (Snyder and Ives 2001, 2003; Schmidt et al. 2003) and parasitoids, and
Recommended publications
  • Do New Access and Benefit Sharing Procedures Under the Convention on Biological Diversity Threaten the Future of Biological Cont
    BioControl DOI 10.1007/s10526-009-9234-9 FORUM PAPER Do new Access and Benefit Sharing procedures under the Convention on Biological Diversity threaten the future of biological control? Matthew J. W. Cock • Joop C. van Lenteren • Jacques Brodeur • Barbara I. P. Barratt • Franz Bigler • Karel Bolckmans • Fernando L. Coˆnsoli • Fabian Haas • Peter G. Mason • Jose´ Roberto P. Parra Received: 25 August 2009 / Accepted: 28 September 2009 Ó International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC) 2009 Abstract Under the Convention on Biological benefits arising from their use need to be established Diversity (CBD) countries have sovereign rights over between involved parties [i.e. Access and Benefit their genetic resources. Agreements governing the Sharing (ABS)]. This also applies to species collected access to these resources and the sharing of the for potential use in biological control. Recent appli- cations of CBD principles have already made it difficult or impossible to collect and export natural Handling Editor: Eric Wajnberg. enemies for biological control research in several countries. If such an approach is widely applied it Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10526-009-9234-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. M. J. W. Cock (&) K. Bolckmans CABI Europe-Switzerland, Rue des Grillons 1, Koppert B.V., Veilingweg 14, Postbus 155, 2800 Dele´mont, Switzerland 2650 AD Berkel en Rodenrijs, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] J. C. van Lenteren F. L. Coˆnsoli Á J. R. P. Parra Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, Departamento de Entomologia e Acarologia, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecticides - Development of Safer and More Effective Technologies
    INSECTICIDES - DEVELOPMENT OF SAFER AND MORE EFFECTIVE TECHNOLOGIES Edited by Stanislav Trdan Insecticides - Development of Safer and More Effective Technologies http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/3356 Edited by Stanislav Trdan Contributors Mahdi Banaee, Philip Koehler, Alexa Alexander, Francisco Sánchez-Bayo, Juliana Cristina Dos Santos, Ronald Zanetti Bonetti Filho, Denilson Ferrreira De Oliveira, Giovanna Gajo, Dejane Santos Alves, Stuart Reitz, Yulin Gao, Zhongren Lei, Christopher Fettig, Donald Grosman, A. Steven Munson, Nabil El-Wakeil, Nawal Gaafar, Ahmed Ahmed Sallam, Christa Volkmar, Elias Papadopoulos, Mauro Prato, Giuliana Giribaldi, Manuela Polimeni, Žiga Laznik, Stanislav Trdan, Shehata E. M. Shalaby, Gehan Abdou, Andreia Almeida, Francisco Amaral Villela, João Carlos Nunes, Geri Eduardo Meneghello, Adilson Jauer, Moacir Rossi Forim, Bruno Perlatti, Patrícia Luísa Bergo, Maria Fátima Da Silva, João Fernandes, Christian Nansen, Solange Maria De França, Mariana Breda, César Badji, José Vargas Oliveira, Gleberson Guillen Piccinin, Alan Augusto Donel, Alessandro Braccini, Gabriel Loli Bazo, Keila Regina Hossa Regina Hossa, Fernanda Brunetta Godinho Brunetta Godinho, Lilian Gomes De Moraes Dan, Maria Lourdes Aldana Madrid, Maria Isabel Silveira, Fabiola-Gabriela Zuno-Floriano, Guillermo Rodríguez-Olibarría, Patrick Kareru, Zachaeus Kipkorir Rotich, Esther Wamaitha Maina, Taema Imo Published by InTech Janeza Trdine 9, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia Copyright © 2013 InTech All chapters are Open Access distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles even for commercial purposes, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. After this work has been published by InTech, authors have the right to republish it, in whole or part, in any publication of which they are the author, and to make other personal use of the work.
    [Show full text]
  • Melanaphis Sacchari), in Grain Sorghum
    DEVELOPMENT OF A RESEARCH-BASED, USER- FRIENDLY, RAPID SCOUTING PROCEDURE FOR THE INVASIVE SUGARCANE APHID (MELANAPHIS SACCHARI), IN GRAIN SORGHUM By JESSICA CARRIE LINDENMAYER Bachelor of Science in Soil and Crop Sciences Bachelor of Science in Horticulture Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 2013 Master of Science in Entomology and Plant Pathology Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 2015 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May, 2019 DEVELOPMENT OF A RESEARCH-BASED, USER- FRIENDLY, RAPID SCOUTING PROCEDURE FOR THE INVASIVE SUGARCANE APHID (MELANAPHIS SACCHARI), IN GRAIN SORGHUM Dissertation Approved: Tom A. Royer Dissertation Adviser Kristopher L. Giles Norman C. Elliott Mark E. Payton ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my amazing committee and all my friends and family for their endless support during my graduate career. I would like to say a special thank you to my husband Brad for supporting me in every way one possibly can, I couldn’t have pursued this dream without you. I’d also like to thank my first child, due in a month. The thought of getting to be your mama pushed me to finish strong so you would be proud of me. Lastly, I want to thank my step father Jasper H. Davis III for showing me how to have a warrior’s spirit and to never give up on something, or someone you love. Your love, spirit, and motivational words will always be heard in my heart even while you’re gone.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting Template
    EFFECTS OF INTERCROPPING AND BIOLOGICAL INSECTICIDES ON SUGARCANE APHID (HEMIPTERA: APHIDIDAE) INFESTATIONS ON SORGHUM, AND IDENTIFICATION OF NATURAL ENEMIES AND ALTERNATE HOSTS IN HAITI By WILFRID CALVIN A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2019 © 2019 Wilfrid Calvin To Jehovah, Issa, Calissa, Amelise, and Mercilhome ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank God for always holding my hand through every step in my life. I am also grateful to my family for their unfailing support throughout my life. I would like to thank my lovely wife for her undying assistance and constant encouragement during my study period. Special thanks to my adorable daughter who endured with love such a long period of time away from daddy to make this achievement possible. I thank Dr. Julien Beuzelin, my committee chair, for all his guidance and support during my master’s study. My committee members, Drs. Oscar Liburd and Marc Branham, have also provided useful advice and support for which I am so thankful. I am also thankful to Mr. Ludger Jean Simon for his support toward the success of the experiments conducted in Haiti. I would like to thank Dr. Elijah Talamas for his help identifying insect samples from Haiti. I thank Donna Larsen for providing technical assistance in all experiments conducted at the UF/IFAS Everglades Research and Education Center (EREC) and for all the help to make my stay in Belle Glade successful. I am also thankful to Erik Roldán for all his help during my master’s program.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Understanding the Ecology of Invasive Crop Insect
    Invasive insect pests and IPM Invasive insect pests and IPM Advances in understanding the ecology of invasive crop insect pests and their impact on IPM Robert Venette, USDA Forest Service, USA; and Amy Morey, University of Minnesota, USA 1 Introduction 2 Ecology of invasive species 3 Invasive species management strategies 4 Relationship of invasive species management to IPM 5 Future trends 6 Acknowledgements 7 Where to look for further information 8 References 1 Introduction Invasive species remain one of the greatest threats to the productivity and sustainability of agriculture, forests, prairies and wetlands (Lovett et al., 2016; Paini et al., 2016). By definition these species are alien (i.e. non-native) to some ecosystems in which they now occur. In their adventive geographic range, they lack co-evolutionary history with the native flora and fauna. As a result, hosts are bereft of specific resistance mechanisms, and no specialized co-evolved natural enemies occur to regulate pest population growth. Alien species become invasive when they cause, or are likely to cause, economic, ecological or social (including human health) harms. Indeed, most insect pests of agriculture and forestry are non-native and efforts to control them dominate applied entomology (Liebhold and Griffin, 2016). The most recent update to the National Road Map for Integrated Pest Management (IPM) places a special emphasis on invasive species (OPMP, 2018). Previous experiences with insect invasions helped to shape modern awareness of the challenges posed by invasive species. For example, invasion by the North American grape phylloxera, Viteus vitifoliae, devastated European vineyards and inspired European nations to enact some of the first quarantine regulations globally to prevent the introduction of insect pests.
    [Show full text]
  • Aphid-Parasitoid (Insecta) Diversity and Trophic Interactions in South Dakota
    Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science, Vol. 97 (2018) 83 APHID-PARASITOID (INSECTA) DIVERSITY AND TROPHIC INTERACTIONS IN SOUTH DAKOTA Abigail P. Martens* and Paul J. Johnson Insect Biodiversity Lab South Dakota State University Brookings, SD 57007 *Corresponding author email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Parasitoid wasps of the subfamily Aphidiinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) specialize on aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) as hosts. The diversity of known and probable aphidiine wasps from South Dakota is itemized, with represen- tation by 13 genera and 42 species, 43% of which are probably adventitious. The wasps and aphids are central to various combinations of multitrophic relationships involving host plants and secondary parasitoids. Selected native and introduced aphid host taxa were quantitatively and qualitatively collected from diverse native and crop host plants in eastern South Dakota and western Iowa. Wasps were reared to confirm plant association, host aphid association, taxonomic diversity, and native or introduced status of the wasps. Acanthocaudus tissoti (Smith) and Aphidius (Aphidius) ohioensis (Smith) were found together on the native aphid Uroleucon (Uroleucon) nigrotuberculatum (Olive), a new host aphid species for both wasps on Solidago canadensis L. (Asterales: Asteraceae). The native waspLysiphlebus testaceipes (Cresson) was repeatedly reared in mas- sive numbers from mummies of invasive Aphis glycines Matsumura on soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. This wasp was also reared from the non-nativeAphis nerii Boyer de Fonscolombe and the native Aphis asclepiadis Fitch, both on Asclepias syriaca L. The introduced wasp Binodoxys communis (Gahan) was not recovered from any Aphis glycines population. Hyperparasitoids from the genus Dendrocerus Ratzeburg (Hymenoptera: Megaspilidae), and the pteromalid (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) genera Asaphes Walker, and Pachyneuron Walker were reared from mummies of Uroleucon (Uroleucon) nigrotuberculatum parasitized by either Acanthocaudus tissoti or Aphidius (Aphidius) ohioensis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use and Exchange of Biological Control Agents for Food and Agriculture
    BACKGROUND STUDY PAPER NO. 47 October 2009 E COMMISSION ON GENETIC RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE THE USE AND EXCHANGE OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE by Matthew J.W. Cock, Joop C. van Lenteren, Jacques Brodeur, Barbara I.P.Barratt, Franz Bigler, Karel Bolckmans, Fernando L. Cônsoli, Fabian Haas, Peter G. Mason, José Roberto P. Parra 1 This document has been prepared at the request of the Secretariat of the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture by the Global Commission on Biological Control and Access and Benefit-Sharing of the International Organisation for Biological Control of Noxious Animals and Plants (IOBC), as a contribution to the cross-sectoral theme, Consideration of policies and arrangements for access and benefit-sharing for genetic resources for food and agriculture , which the Commission will consider at its Twelfth Regular Session. The content of this document is entirely the responsibility of the authors, and does not necessarily represent the views of the FAO, or its Members. 1 For affiliation of the authors see Annex 2. BACKGROUND STUDY PAPER NO. 47 i TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THIS PUBLICATION .................................................................................................................1 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................................2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • A Contribution to the Aphid Fauna of Greece
    Bulletin of Insectology 60 (1): 31-38, 2007 ISSN 1721-8861 A contribution to the aphid fauna of Greece 1,5 2 1,6 3 John A. TSITSIPIS , Nikos I. KATIS , John T. MARGARITOPOULOS , Dionyssios P. LYKOURESSIS , 4 1,7 1 3 Apostolos D. AVGELIS , Ioanna GARGALIANOU , Kostas D. ZARPAS , Dionyssios Ch. PERDIKIS , 2 Aristides PAPAPANAYOTOU 1Laboratory of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Department of Agriculture Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, Nea Ionia, Magnesia, Greece 2Laboratory of Plant Pathology, Department of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece 3Laboratory of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology, Agricultural University of Athens, Greece 4Plant Virology Laboratory, Plant Protection Institute of Heraklion, National Agricultural Research Foundation (N.AG.RE.F.), Heraklion, Crete, Greece 5Present address: Amfikleia, Fthiotida, Greece 6Present address: Institute of Technology and Management of Agricultural Ecosystems, Center for Research and Technology, Technology Park of Thessaly, Volos, Magnesia, Greece 7Present address: Department of Biology-Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece Abstract In the present study a list of the aphid species recorded in Greece is provided. The list includes records before 1992, which have been published in previous papers, as well as data from an almost ten-year survey using Rothamsted suction traps and Moericke traps. The recorded aphidofauna consisted of 301 species. The family Aphididae is represented by 13 subfamilies and 120 genera (300 species), while only one genus (1 species) belongs to Phylloxeridae. The aphid fauna is dominated by the subfamily Aphidi- nae (57.1 and 68.4 % of the total number of genera and species, respectively), especially the tribe Macrosiphini, and to a lesser extent the subfamily Eriosomatinae (12.6 and 8.3 % of the total number of genera and species, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • E0020 Common Beneficial Arthropods Found in Field Crops
    Common Beneficial Arthropods Found in Field Crops There are hundreds of species of insects and spi- mon in fields that have not been sprayed for ders that attack arthropod pests found in cotton, pests. When scouting, be aware that assassin bugs corn, soybeans, and other field crops. This publi- can deliver a painful bite. cation presents a few common and representative examples. With few exceptions, these beneficial Description and Biology arthropods are native and common in the south- The most common species of assassin bugs ern United States. The cumulative value of insect found in row crops (e.g., Zelus species) are one- predators and parasitoids should not be underes- half to three-fourths of an inch long and have an timated, and this publication does not address elongate head that is often cocked slightly important diseases that also attack insect and upward. A long beak originates from the front of mite pests. Without biological control, many pest the head and curves under the body. Most range populations would routinely reach epidemic lev- in color from light brownish-green to dark els in field crops. Insecticide applications typical- brown. Periodically, the adult female lays cylin- ly reduce populations of beneficial insects, often drical brown eggs in clusters. Nymphs are wing- resulting in secondary pest outbreaks. For this less and smaller than adults but otherwise simi- reason, you should use insecticides only when lar in appearance. Assassin bugs can easily be pest populations cannot be controlled with natu- confused with damsel bugs, but damsel bugs are ral and biological control agents.
    [Show full text]
  • IOBC Internet Book of Biological Control – Draft September 2005
    IOBC Internet Book of Biological Control Version 5, January 2008 IOBC Internet Book of Biological Control, version 5 Editor: J.C. van Lenteren ([email protected]) Aim: to present the history, the current state of affairs and the future of biological control in order to show that this control method is sound, safe and sustainable Contents 1. Introduction......................................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Discovery of natural enemies and a bit of entomological history ..................................................................... 10 3. Development of idea to use natural enemies for pest control and classification of types of biological control 16 4. History of biological control ............................................................................................................................. 22 5. Current situation of biological control (including region/country revieuws).................................................... 41 6. Biological control of weeds .............................................................................................................................. 51 7. Future of biological control: to be written ........................................................................................................ 61 8. Mass production, storage, shipment and release of natural enemies................................................................. 62 9. Commercial and non-commercial producers
    [Show full text]
  • Wcc 66 Minutes of the Annual Meeting 2004
    WESTERN COORDINATING COMMITTEE – 066 Integrated Management of Russian Wheat Aphid and Other Cereal Aphids MINUTES OF THE ANNUAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 26-28, 2004 MANHATTAN, KANSAS Report Submitted by KA Shufran Minutes recorded at meeting by D Mornhinweg List of participants 1. Tom Holtzer, Administrative Co-advisor, Colorado St. Univ. 2. Sue Blodgett, Montana St. Univ. 3. Louis Hesler, Chair, USDA-ARS, Brookings, SD 4. Frank Peairs, Colorado St. Univ. 5. Keith Pike, Washington St. Univ. 6. David Porter, USDA-ARS, Stillwater, OK 7. Sean Keenan, Oklahoma St. Univ. 8. J.P. Michaud, Kansas St. Univ. 9. Do Mornhinweg, USDA-ARS, Stillwater, OK 10. Cheryl Baker, USDA-ARS, Stillwater, OK 11. John Reese, Kansas St. Univ. 12. Marion Harris, North Dakota St. Univ. 13. Juan Manuel Alvarez, University of Idaho 14. Norman Elliott, USDA-ARS, Stillwater, OK 15. Allan Fritz, Kansas St. Univ. 16. John Burd, USDA-ARS, Stillwater, OK 17. Michael Roberts, Kansas St. Univ. 18. Amanda Schroeder, Kansas St. Univ. 19. Gerald Wilde, Kansas St. Univ. 20. Gary Hein, University of Nebraska 21. Yiqun Weng, Texas Ag. Exper. Station-Amarillo 22. Kris Giles, Oklahoma St. Univ. 23. Tom Royer, Oklahoma St. Univ. 24. Mpho Phoofolo, Oklahoma St. Univ. 25. Mike Smith, Kansas St. Univ. Minutes Sept. 27. 8:30 AM - Louis Hesler, WCC-66 chair, opened the meeting. Kevin Shufran (secretary/chair elect) was not in attendance due to an injury. Do Mornhinweg 1 acted as secretary for the meeting. Dr. Hesler thanked Mike Smith, John Reese, and Gerald Wilde for the local arrangements and welcomed participants to the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Temperature Dependent Development of Sugarcane Aphids
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology Entomology, Department of 2019 Temperature Dependent Development of Sugarcane Aphids Melanaphis Sacchari, (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on Three Different Host Plants with Estimates of the Lower and Upper Threshold for Fecundity Michael A. De Souza J. Scott Armstrong W. Wyatt Hoback Phillip G. Mulder Sulochana Paudyal See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub Part of the Entomology Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Michael A. De Souza, J. Scott Armstrong, W. Wyatt Hoback, Phillip G. Mulder, Sulochana Paudyal, John E. Foster, Mark E. Payton, and Josephine Akosa Current Trends in Entomology and Zoological Studies Souza MA, et al. Curr Trends Entomol Zool Stds 2: 1011. Research Article DOI:10.29011/CTEZS-1011.001011 Temperature Dependent Development of Sugarcane Aphids Melana- phis Sacchari, (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on Three Different Host Plants with Estimates of the Lower and Upper Threshold for Fecundity Misael A De Souza1, J Scott Armstrong2*, W Wyatt Hoback1, Phillip G Mulder1, Sulochana Paudyal1 , John E Foster3, Mark E Payton4, Josephine Akosa5 1Department
    [Show full text]