Corrals for Handling Beef Cattle (Agdex 420/723-1)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Corrals for Handling Beef Cattle (Agdex 420/723-1) Published by: Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development Information Packaging Centre 7000 - 113 Street Edmonton, Alberta Canada T6H 5T6 Production Editor: David Orey Graphic Designer: Wendy Luedtke Copyright © 1993. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical photocopying, recording or otherwise without written permission from the Information Management Division, Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development. ISBN 0-7732-6126-5 Copies of this publication may be purchased from: Publications Office Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development 7000 - 113 Street Edmonton, Alberta Canada T6H 5T6 Phone: (780) 427-0391 See our web site <www.agriculture.alberta.ca> for information about our publications, videos and CD-ROMs. Printed in Canada •••••••••••ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ••••••••••• Credit is due to many sources for the written material and drawings contained in this publication. The chapters on cattle behaviour are based on extensive research papers presented by Temple Grandin, Colorado State University, Department of Animal Sciences and Grandin Livestock Handling Systems Inc. Ideas for the various components and layouts were derived from sources such as the following: • Canada Plan Service • Saskatchewan Agriculture • Midwest Plan Service (MWPS) from the United States • Western Regional Agricultural Engineering Service (WRAES) in Washington • Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development The corral costs were calculated using a Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet developed by Dennis Darby, farm structures engineer, Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Lethbridge. The blind box chute and corral layout 11 were developed by Trevor Jones, beef specialist, Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Fairview. Special thanks to Christine Corbett for her contribution to the publication. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...............................3 CORRAL LAYOUTS (cont’d) Layout 7 – Saskatchewan S186 CATTLE BEHAVIOUR ......................5 8 – Saskatchewan S185 Effects Of Stress On Cattle 9 – CPS 1835 Reproduction 10 – WRAES Plan Disease 11 – T Jones Plan Vision 12 – Yurchak Plan 1 Understanding The Flight Zone 13 – Yurchak Plan 2 Curved Chutes 14 – Yurchak Plan 3 Herd Instinct 15 – Saskatchewan S187 Response To Light 16 – Grandin/Pembina Response To Movement 17 – Grandin/Winchell/Large Corral HANDLER TECHNIQUE ...................9 18 – MWPS Indoor Corral 19 – Winchell Roofed Plan Moving Groups on Pasture 20 – Darby Covered Corral Single Handler Two Handlers CORRAL GEOMETRY ....................72 Stragglers How to Lay Out a Circular Working Chute How To Fill A Corral How to Set the Posts for a Circular How To Empty A Corral Working Chute CORRAL DESIGN ..........................12 How to Lay Out a Circular Crowding Tub Collection Alley How to Lay Out a Circular Crowding Tub Sorting Pens – Method 2 Sorting Alley Holding Pens CORRAL COSTS ............................77 Crowding Pens COMPONENTS ...............................78 360° Crowding Pen Fence Design Single File Working Chute Gates Concrete Floor Squeeze Selection Cutting Gate Option Blind Box Loading Chute A.I. Chute Trailer Loading Areas Scales Crowding Pen, Working Chute Combinations REFERENCES ................................91 CORRAL LAYOUTS .......................31 Canada Plan Service (CPS) Plans Layout 1 – Minimum Working Corral Midwest Plan Service (MWPS) 2 – Minimum Corral Two Saskatchewan Agriculture 3 – MWPS Corral Western Regional Agricultural Engineering 4 – Double Circle Corral Service (WRAES) 5 – USDA Alberta Agriculture Resources 6 – Winchell Plan Corrals for Handling Beef Cattle 1 2 Corrals for Handling Beef Cattle Purchase the print version of Corrals for Handling Beef Cattle for $12. Buy it on-line www.rtw.ca/b422 INTRODUCTION Good cattle handling systems make work easy The operation of any cattle facility depends for limited manpower operations and confine on cattle behaviour, corral design and the skill cattle in a hazard free environment. and technique of the handler. The number of cattle to be handled, the number of handlers Well designed corrals will: and the time available all affect the appropriate • reduce handling time and operator corral design. This publication looks at cattle requirements behaviour, shows how to design cattle handling • increase operator safety corrals, and gives instructions on how to build • minimize animal injury and stress during gates, pens, fences and working areas. treatment and handling operations A complete cattle handling facility will allow you to: • gather • direct the flow • hold • sort • position Corrals for Handling Beef Cattle 3 4 Corrals for Handling Beef Cattle Purchase the print version of Corrals for Handling Beef Cattle for $12. Buy it on-line www.rtw.ca/b422 CATTLE BEHAVIOUR EFFECTS OF STRESS ON CATTLE chute will try to rejoin its herdmates and may • Reduced weight gain charge the handler. • Poor reproductive performance • Reduced ability to fight disease REPRODUCTION Rough handling during artificial insemination Temple Grandin says, “Handling practices (AI) can raise body temperatures and lower can be less stressful to the animals and conception rates. High body temperature safer for the handler if one understands at the time of insemination increases the the behavioural characteristics of livestock.” risk of early embryonic death. Excitement before insemination depresses secretion of Genetics hormones that stimulate contractions of the Breed differences mean some cattle are reproductive tract that move sperm to the more excitable. Recognize this while site of ovum fertilization. Use a dark box to handling cattle. hold cows. You can hold the wildest cow with minimum distress. Individual differences Each animal is an individual and has a DISEASE different reaction to stress. There is evidence that stress due to rough Past experience handling can affect cattle’s immune response Animals have long memories. If they have – they are more susceptible to disease. been handled roughly in the past, they will be more stressed and difficult to handle in the VISION future. Choice is a factor in stress – feedlot Cattle have excellent wide angle vision, in cattle who will freely investigate a coat hanging excess of 300 degrees, due to the position of on a fence will balk when forced to walk past their eyes. Cattle can see behind themselves the same coat hanging on a chute or flapping in the breeze. without turning their heads. Ruminants do have depth perception, but they have difficulty Familiarity with the environment perceiving depth at ground level while they are New pens and facilities are stressful. Let the moving with their heads raised. To see depth cattle get used to the corrals. Cattle also show at the ground the cow has to lower its head, signs of stress when they are isolated. A single perhaps explaining why cattle balk at shadows animal left alone in a crowding pen or working or distractions at ground level. Corrals for Handling Beef Cattle 5 UNDERSTANDING THE FLIGHT ZONE The flight zone is the animal’s personal space. 25 feet for feedlot cattle and 300 feet for range If you move inside the flight zone the animal cattle. If you are behind the point of balance will move away. When you back off, the animal the animal moves forward. If you are ahead of will stop moving. The size of the flight zone the point of balance the animal retreats. depends on wildness or tameness of the cattle, angle of handler approach and state of A technique that works well with cattle that are excitement of the cattle. Work at the edge of moving is not to approach cattle directly, but the flight zone at an angle 45° to 60° behind the to work close to the point of balance, moving animal’s shoulder. The cattle will circle away back and forth on a line parallel to the direction from you. The flight zone radius may be five to the animal is travelling. Figure 2. The flight zone flight zone boundary blind spot A - position to stop movement B - position to start movement point of balance 6 Corrals for Handling Beef Cattle Purchase the print version of Corrals for Handling Beef Cattle for $12. Buy it on-line www.rtw.ca/b422 Figure 3. Increased flight zone Figure 4. Decreased flight zone Corrals for Handling Beef Cattle 7 CURVED CHUTES the squeeze is almost empty before refilling. Curved working chutes prevent the animal The crowd gate is used to follow the cattle, from seeing the truck, squeeze chute and not to shove up against them. If a lone animal people until it is almost in the truck or refuses to move, release it and bring it back squeeze. A curved chute takes advantage with another group. of the animal’s natural circling behaviour. An animal left alone in a crowding pen will As you enter a pen the animals will form a become agitated and may attempt to jump circle around you and face you. As you move the fence to rejoin its herdmates. through the pen they will circle around you. A catwalk along the inside of the chute will RESPONSE TO LIGHT force the handler to stand in the best position Uniform lighting is important. Cattle avoid for moving the animal and will let the animal shadows. Striped shadows and contrasting circle away from the handler. Never have a patterns will cause balking. catwalk overhead. Cattle in the dark will move towards the light. HERD INSTINCT If you are loading at night, use a frosted light to shine into the truck. Avoid glare in their faces. Cattle will follow the leader. They are motivated to maintain visual contact with Livestock tend to balk if they have to look into each other. Each animal should be able to the sun. Face your loading chute and squeeze see others ahead of it. Make single file chutes north-south for summer handling. at least 20 feet long, 30 to 50 feet for larger facilities. Don’t force an animal in a single file Cattle may refuse to enter a dark, indoor chute unless it has a place to go.
Recommended publications
  • Cycling Infrastructure Policy June 2017
    Cycling Infrastructure Policy June 2017 Department of Transport and Main Roads Creative Commons information © State of Queensland (Department of Transport and Main Roads) 2015 http://creativecommons.org.licences/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licence. You are free to copy, communicate and adapt the work, as long as you attribute the authors. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of information. However, copyright protects this publication. The State of Queensland has no objection to this material being reproduced, made available online or electronically but only if its recognised as the owner of the copyright and this material remains unaltered. The Queensland Government is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders of all cultural and linguistic backgrounds. If you have difficulty understanding this publication and need a translator, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 13 14 50 and ask them to telephone the Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads on 13 74 68. Disclaimer: While every care has been taken in preparing this publication, the State of Queensland accepts no responsibility for decisions or actions taken as a result of any data, information, statement or advice, expressed or implied, contained within. To the best of our knowledge, the content was correct at the time of publishing. Cycling Infrastructure Policy June 2017 - i - Document control options Departmental approvals Refer to the
    [Show full text]
  • ||||IHHHHHHHHHHH USOO512772A United States Patent (19) 11) Patent Number: 5,127,172 Lund Et Al
    ||||IHHHHHHHHHHH USOO512772A United States Patent (19) 11) Patent Number: 5,127,172 Lund et al. 45 Date of Patent: Jul. 7, 1992 4,779,363 10/1988 Boutralis et al. .............. 37/118 RX (54) GUARD RAIL CLEANOUT DEVICE 4,843,743 7/1989. Durieux ................................ 37/103 76) Inventors: Kenneth Lund, 21429 Lofton Ave. 4,945,662 8/1990 Kreye ...... ... 37/17.5 X N.; Thomas W. Boesel, 16360-209th 4,946,392 6/1990 Kitchin .......................... 37/117.5 X St., N., both of Scandia, Minn. 55073 OTHER PUBLICATIONS 21) Appl. No.: 766,980 “Men See Money in Sand, Clean Up," Chris J. Bohrer, 22 Filed: Sep. 27, 1991 Washington County (Minn.) Washline, p. 2, Jun-Jul. 1990. Related U.S. Application Data "Innovative employees Win Awards," Kay Bruchu, 63 Continuation of Ser. No. 575,373, Aug. 28, 1991, aban Washington County (Minn.) Washline, p. 1, May-Jun. doned. 1991. 51) Int. Cl. ................................................ E02F 3/76 Primary Examiner-Randolph A. Reese 52 U.S. C. ................................ 37/117.5; 37/141 R; Assistant Examiner-J. Russell McBee 37/DIG. 12 Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Jacobson & Johnson 58) Field of Search .............. 37/117.5, 118 R, 141 R, 37/103, DIG.3, DIG.12; 172/445. 1, 817 (57) ABSTRACT A device including a set of blades for removing dirt . (56) References Cited from underneath guard rails, with blades extending U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS outward from the guard rail clean-out device in a canti 1,735,297 11/1929 Pardue . levered fashion to allow a user to extend the blades 2,186,081 1/1940 Slavin .
    [Show full text]
  • Bridging the Gaps in Bicycling Networks an Advocate’S Guide to Getting Bikes on Bridges
    Bridging the Gaps in Bicycling Networks An advocate’s guide to getting bikes on bridges Bridges are important. Whether over rivers, lakes, or built obstacles such as freeways, bridges are critical to bicyclists. Inaccessible bridges can force substantial detours or sever routes entirely, effectively discouraging or eliminating bike travel. As veteran Seattle bike and pedestrian planner Peter Lagerwey says: "If you can't get across the bridges, nothing else matters." In addition to their practical worth, bridges are also often high‐profile, large‐scale projects; the inclusion of bicycle facilities is an important symbolic recognition of the role of bicycling and walking in transportation networks. Bicyclists can expect to see more and more bridges under construction in the coming months and years, creating opportunities (and risks) for bicyclists. According to the Government Accountability Office, one quarter of the 602,977 bridges on the country’s roadways is either structurally deficient and in need of repair, or functionally obsolete and is not adequate for today’s traffic needs. Seventy‐one thousand of them are considered structurally deficient, with a major defect in structure or deck. In some states, more than 20 percent of the bridges fit this description. A 2010 report by the U.S. PIRG Education Fund observes that, “Generally, engineers build bridges in the United States for a useful life of 50 years. The average age of America’s bridges is now 43 years, with 185,000 over 50 years old. By 2030, that number could double.” These overdue bridge repair or replacement projects mean more chances to open up bridges to biking and walking than ever before.
    [Show full text]
  • Ottawa County Road Commission Standards and Specifications for PLAT CONDOMINIUM and PUBLIC ROAD DEVELOPMENT BOARD of COUNTY ROAD
    Ottawa County Road Commission Standards and Specifications For PLAT CONDOMINIUM And PUBLIC ROAD DEVELOPMENT BOARD OF COUNTY ROAD COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF OTTAWA 1 Regulations pertain to the subdivision of lands located outside the corporate limits of any city or village in the County of Ottawa and to the lands within incorporated areas when such lands are adjacent to public highways under the jurisdiction of the Board of County Road Commissioners of the County of Ottawa. The following Standards and Specifications were adopted by the Board of County Road Commissioners on January 12, 2006 2 CONTENTS I. PURPOSE 1 II. DEFINITIONS 1 lll. DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 2 A. Preliminary Plans 2 1. Preparation of Plans 2 2. Road Names 2 3. Submission of Preliminary Plans 2 4. Approval of Preliminary Plans 3 B. Right-Of-Way Requirements 3 1. General Requirements 3 2. Width Requirements 3 C. Conformity 3 IV. CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND IMPROVEMENTS 5 A. Road and Drainage Plans 5 B. Drainage Easements 5 C. Drainage Structures 5 1. Crossroad Culverts and Bridges 5 2. Driveway Culverts 5 3. Storm Sewer 6 4. Under drains 6 5. Storm Sewer Accessibility 6 D. Utilities 7 E. Guard Posts, Guard Rail and Barricades 7 F. Clearing, Removal of Trees, Brush, Roots and Topsoil 7 G. Road Improvements 7 1. Typical Road Sections 7 2. Turnaround Section 7 3. Boulevard Section 9 4. Grades and Sight Distance 10 5. Traffic Impact Study 10 6. Intersecting Roadway Improvements 10 7. Existing Road Cleanup 10 8. Material Requirements and Specifications 11 9. Concrete Curb & Gutter 11 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Value of Travel Time Savings Estimation for More Effective Transportation Project Evaluation
    Improving Value of Travel Time Savings Estimation for More Effective Transportation Project Evaluation BDK85 977-21 Final Report December 2011 i Improving Value of Travel Time Savings Estimation for More Effective Transportation Project Evaluation BDK85 977-21 Final Report Prepared for: Florida Department of Transportation Research Center 605 Suwannee Street, MS 30 Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 Project Manager: Amy Datz Prepared by: Victoria A. Perk Joseph S. DeSalvo, Ph.D. Tara A. Rodrigues Nina M. Verzosa Steven C. Bovino Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, CUT-100 Tampa, FL 33620-5375 December 2011 i DRAFT October 2011 ii DISCLAIMER The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the State of Florida Department of Transportation. iii iv Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Improving Value of Travel Time Savings Estimation for More December 2011 Effective Transportation Project Evaluation 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Victoria A. Perk, Joseph S. DeSalvo, Tara A. Rodrigues, Nina M. Verzosa, Steven C. Bovino 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, CUT-100 11. Contract or Grant No. Tampa, FL 33620 BDK85 977-21 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Florida Department of Transportation Final Report Research Center March 2010 – December 2011 605 Suwannee Street, MS 30 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Planned Residential District Rezoning for Preston Row” Rezoning Package Dated January 3, 2017, Prepared by Gay and Neel, Inc
    PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT REZONING FOR PRESTON ROW BLACKSBURG , VIRGINIA January 3, 2017 Prepared For: Broadstreet Partners LLC 148 River Street, Suite 205 Greenville, SC 29601 Prepared by: Job No. 2720.0 Table of Contents APPLICATION .................................................................................................................................. 3-11 PROFFER STATEMENT ..................................................................................................................... 12-14 TRAFFIC IMPACT APPLICATION ..…………………………………………………………………………………………………..15-17 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ....................................................................................................... 18-23 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................... 24-27 CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................................... 28 APPENDIX ..................................................................................................................................... 29-51 A. DEED B. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS C. TOWN OF BLACKSBURG EMAIL REGARDING SEWER CAPACITY SERVICE D. EXISTING ZONING MAP & EXISTING LAND USE MAP E. FUTURE LAND USE MAP & MIXED USE AREA C MAP F. UDA AREA MAP G. BT TRANSIT STOPS H. EXISTING SURVEY I. SITE PLAN J. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND ELEVATIONS 2 Preston Row APPLICATION 3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 059E2474-F8CC-42F9-9DF8-058DF4F362BA Kattrin Kinder,
    [Show full text]
  • Guardrail and Bridge Rail Recommendations for Very Low-Volume Local Roads in Kansas
    Report No. KS-14-16 ▪ FINAL REPORT▪ December 2014 Guardrail and Bridge Rail Recommendations for Very Low-Volume Local Roads in Kansas Ronald J. Seitz, P.E. Tod Salfrank Kansas Department of Transportation Bureau of Local Projects Division of Operations Bureau of Research This page intentionally left blank. 1 Report No. 2 Government Accession No. 3 Recipient Catalog No. KS-14-16 4 Title and Subtitle 5 Report Date Guardrail and Bridge Rail Recommendations for Very Low-Volume December 2014 Local Roads in Kansas 6 Performing Organization Code 7 Author(s) 7 Performing Organization Report Ronald J. Seitz, P.E., and Tod Salfrank No. 9 Performing Organization Name and Address 10 Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Kansas Department of Transportation Bureau of Local Projects 11 Contract or Grant No. 700 SW Harrison Street 3rd Floor West Topeka, Kansas 66603-3745 12 Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13 Type of Report and Period Kansas Department of Transportation Covered Bureau of Research Final Report 2300 SW Van Buren Topeka, Kansas 66611-1195 14 Sponsoring Agency Code 15 Supplementary Notes For more information write to address in block 9. The determination of warrants for bridge railing and approach guardrails is a fundamental roadside safety issue. These are specialized roadside safety barriers that are intended to capture and smoothly redirect errant vehicles that leave the roadway either on the bridge itself or on the approach to the bridge. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requires tested bridge rails and approach guardrails on all National Highway System (NHS) Roadways. However, states are given the discretion to develop their own policies for non-NHS roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Guardrails Data Set Summary Data Set Basics Title Guardrails Abstract Displays the Location and Some Attributes of Guardrails Owned and Maintained by SDOT
    ArcGIS Metadata Form Guardrails Data Set Summary Data Set Basics Title Guardrails Abstract Displays the location and some attributes of guardrails owned and maintained by SDOT. Description Guardrails are devices designed to keep pedestrians and motor vehicles from straying off the road into potentially dangerous or off-limit areas of the ROW. To be used in the GIS for mapping, analysis, and tracking purposes. Supplemental Guardrails are freestanding barriers supported by posts as opposed to jersey Information barriers which are not. Update Frequency Weekly Keyword(s) SDOT, Seattle, Transportation, Guardrails, Safety, Streets Contact Information Contact SDOT Traffic Management, Traffic Operations Group Organization Contact Person SDOT GIS Analyst Contact Email [email protected] Attribute Information Attribute Data type, Description length OBJECTID ObjectID ESRI unique identifier COMPKEY Long Primary key of the Guard Rail asset table, assigned by the Hansen asset management system. UNITID Text, 20 Alpha -numeric Hansen unique identifier. Begins with GDR. UNITDESC Text, 255 Structured description of the Guard Rail location MODBY Text, 30 User who last modified record in Hansen MODDTTM Date Date/time record was last updated in Hansen Page 1 of 4 ArcGIS Metadata Form Attribute Data type, Description length CONDITION Text, 10 Guard Rail condition: GOOD = The Guard Rail has not sustained any impacts AND it shows no signs of corrosion. Age: 0-17 years. FAIR = The Guard Rail has cosmetic (i.e., paint transfer) damage, but the structure is not compromised. AND/OR it shows signs of minor corrosion (i.e., minor rust). Age: 17-25 years. POOR = The Guard Rail has sustained an impact such that it needs to be replaced.
    [Show full text]
  • “Retired” Dairy Facilities for Raising Steers Remodeling Options Are
    Remodeling Options are Endless Remodeling “Retired” Dairy Facilities for Raising Steers David W. Kammel BSE- UW-Madison The Design Process Develop the steer Change the management plan Management Investigate and develop Plan Design Your Facilities to alternative designs Implement Your Management Plan Evaluate alternatives and options Change the Choose the “best” system design Design Troubleshoot and implement the design Farm Resources Develop a Steer Management Plan Define management group and number in group List Needs of Steer Land Space – Comfort Feed • Resting Space – Environment – Nutrition Labor • Outside Lot Space – Health Care • Feed Space – Movement between groups Facilities – Manure Handling • Fence • Water Space List Needs (and wants) of the Owner • Water • Manure Storage Determine features that meet these needs and (wants) • Shelter Prioritize the list of features • Storage 1 Housing Basics Economics Provide animal comfort Minimize Capital Costs • Clean dry hair coat • Housing • Dry bedding Minimize Operational Costs • Adequate Space • Feed • Resting • Feed • Bedding • Water Minimize labor costs • Excellent ventilation • Daily feeding, bedding, observation Efficient use of labor • Periodic cleaning and moving Effectively utilize a farm’s resources Foundation Wall A Feed Alley Planning Information Feed 11'-3" Stalls Gutter Pos t Spac ed @ 7-8' O.C. Center Alley 11'-6" 35'-0" Longitudional (King) Beam Stalls Maternity Milk Pen House 11'-3" Feed Alley 126'-0" Original Barn Plan View A Roof Hay Mow Floor Floor Joists Longitudional Existing Stall Pos t Spac ed (King) Beam @ 7'-8' O.C. Feed Alley Center Alley Stalls Gutter Barn 6'-0" 6'-0" 1'-6" 7'-0" 1'-6" 6'-0" 6'-0" 11'-3" 11'-6" 11'-3" 35'-0" Original Barn Cross Section View Cross Section AA Possible Limitations • Location • Structure • Ceiling Height • Concrete •Posts • Gutter • Water Pipes • Ventilation Existing Stall Barn 2 Calf Barn Remodel Foundation Wall Feed Alley Feed 11'-3" Individual Calf Stalls Gutter Post Spaced @ 7-8' O.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenway Criteria and Design Guide West Ashley Greenway in Charleston, S.C
    Greenway Criteria and Design Guide West Ashley Greenway in Charleston, S.C. On the cover: Schuylkill River Trail in Philadelphia. Contents Executive Summary..............................................................................2 Route Vision..........................................................................................4 Where the Greenway Is Built...............................................................7 How the Greenway Is Built..................................................................8 Surfaces.................................................................................................9 Width...................................................................................................16 Grade...................................................................................................17 Crossings..............................................................................................18 Bridges.................................................................................................19 Separated On-Road Facilities.............................................................21 On-Road Designation Exceptions: Context Sensitive Design..........22 Signage...............................................................................................24 Additional Resources.........................................................................28 Appendix: Natural Surface/Crushed Stone....................................30 Glossary & Definitions........................................................................31
    [Show full text]
  • ESC 520 Level Crossings, Version 2.3 Section 5.12 SPG 0724 Level Crossing Protection Equipment – Installation, Section 6.11 Version 1.4
    Technical Note - TN 039: 2017 For queries regarding this document [email protected] www.asa.transport.nsw.gov.au Technical Note - TN 039: 2017 Issued date: 28 September 2017 Effective date: 28 September 2017 Subject: Withdrawn sections of RailCorp standards due to update of infrastructure lighting requirements This technical note is issued by the Asset Standards Authority (ASA) to notify that the sections of the RailCorp documents listed in Table 1 are now withdrawn from use: Table 1 – Withdrawn sections of RailCorp standards RailCorp standard Withdrawn section ESC 520 Level Crossings, version 2.3 Section 5.12 SPG 0724 Level Crossing Protection Equipment – Installation, Section 6.11 version 1.4 The lighting requirements contained in these sections are now superseded by the requirements specified in T HR SS 80001 ST Infrastructure Lighting. Authorisation: Technical content Checked and Interdisciplinary Authorised for prepared by approved by coordination release checked by Signature Date Name Marc Janowski Gary Bayman Jason R Gordon Jagath Peiris Position Principal Engineer Lead Stations and Chief Engineer Director Building Services and Buildings Engineer Network Standards Electrical and Services © State of NSW through Transport for NSW 2017 Page 1 of 1 Engineering Standard Right of Way ESC 520 LEVEL CROSSINGS Version 2.3 Issued July 2010 Reconfirmed 26 June 2019 Owner: Chief Engineer Civil Approved by: John Stapleton Authorised by: Richard Hitch A/Principal Engineer Chief Engineer Civil Technology & Standards Engineering Standard Disclaimer This document was prepared for use on the RailCorp Network only. RailCorp makes no warranties, express or implied, that compliance with the contents of this document shall be sufficient to ensure safe systems or work or operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedestrian Guard Railing: a Review of Criteria for Installation
    Pedestrian Guard Railing: A Review of Criteria for Installation by P. Zheng and R.D.Hall (Transportation Research Group) Contract No: 1505 This report has been produced by the Transportation Research Group (University of Southampton) for Transport for London. Any views expressed are not necessarily those of Transport for London. Pedestrian Guard Railing: A Review of Criteria for Installation FINAL REPORT to Transport for London Contract No: 1505 by P. Zheng and R.D.Hall Transportation Research Group University of Southampton October 2003 Transportation Research Group School of Civil Engineering and the Environment University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ Tel: 023 8059 2192 Fax: 023 8059 3152 email: [email protected] Web: www.trg.soton.ac.uk Pedestrian Guard Railing – A Review of Criteria for Installation CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................... ii LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................. iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................ v 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1 2 CURRENT GUIDELINES AND PRACTICE FOR INSTALLATION.................. 2 2.1 Introduction..........................................................................................................2 2.2 Guidelines on Installation.....................................................................................2
    [Show full text]