DOCSLIB.ORG

Crown Proceedings (CAP

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Crown Proceedings (CAP LAWS OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA Crown Proceedings (CAP. 121 1 CHAPTER 121 THE CROWN PROCEEDINGS ACT Arrangement of Sections Sections 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. PART I - SUBSTANTIVE LAW. 3. Right to sue the Crown. 4. Liability of the Crown in tort. 5. Provisions as to industrial property. 6, Application of law as to indemnity and contribution. 7. Liability in connection with postal packets. 8. Provisions relating to the armed forces. 9. Saving in respect of acts done under prerogative and statutory powers. PART I1 -JURISDICTION AND PROCEDURE. 10. Abolition of certain proceedings and institution of civil proceedings in the Supreme Court. 11. Civil proceedings in the Court of Summary Jurisdic- tion and Magistrate's Court. 12. Interpleader. 13. Parties to proceedings. 14. Service of documents. 15. Removal and transfer of proceedings. 16. Nature of relief. 17. Costs in civil proceedings to which the Crown is a party. 18. Appeals and stay of execution. 19. Scope of Part 11. PART I11 - JUDGMENTS AND EXECUTION. 20. Interest on debts, damages and costs. 21. Satisfaction of orders against the Crown. 22. Execution by the Crown. 23. Attachment of moneys payable by the Crown. LAWS OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA 2 CAP. 121) Crown Proceedings PART IV - MISCELLANEOUS AND SUPPLEMENTAL. 24. Discovery. 25. Exclusion of proceedings in rem against the Crown. 26. Limitation of actions. 27. Application to the Crown of certain statutory provisions. 28. No abatement on demise of Crown. 29. Rules of court. 30. Pending proceedings. 31 . Financial provisions. 32. Savings. SCHEDULE. LAWS OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA Crown Proceedings (CAP. 121 3 CROWN PROCEEDINGS (30th June, 1956.) 1911954. 1511956. 211957. 1. This Act may be cited as the Crown Proceedings short title. Act. 2. (1) Any reference in this Act to the provisions of Interpretation. this Act shall, unless the context otherwise requires, include a reference to rules of court and Magistrates' Courts rules made for the purposes of this Act. (2) In this Act- "agent" when used in relation to the Crown, includes an independent contractor employed by the Crown; "Her Majesty's aircraft" does not include aircraft belonging to Her Majesty otherwise than in right of Her Government in the United Kingdom; "Her Majesty's ships" means ships of which the beneficial interest is vested in Her Majesty" < or which are registered as Government ships for the purposes of the Merchant Shipping Acts, 1894 to 1940, or which are for the time bei& demised or subdemised L, to or in the exclusive possession of the Crown, except that the said expression does not include any ship in which Her Majesty is interested otherwise than in right of Her Government in the United Kingdom unless that ship is for the time being demised or subdemised to Her Majesty in right of Her said Government or in the exclusive posses- sion of Her Majesty in that right; "Magistrates' Courts rules" includes rules made by the Governor-General under section 250 of the Magistrate's Code of Procedure Act and pursuant Cap. 255. to section 29; LAWS OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA 4 CAP. 121) Crown Proceedings "civil proceedings" include proceedings in the Supreme Court or the Court of Summary Jurisdiction for the recovery of fines and penalties; "officer" in relation to the Crown includes the Governor-General, a Minister, and any servant of Her Majesty in right of Her Government of Antigua and Barbuda; "order" includes a judgment, decree, rule, award or declaration; "prescribed" means prescribed by rules made under section 29; "proceedings against the Crown" includes a claim by way of set-off or counterclaim raised in proceedings by the Crown; "statutory duty" means any duty imposed by or under any Act or other law extending to (or having effect in) Antigua and Barbuda. (3) Any reference in Parts I11 and IV to civil pro- ceedings by or against the Crown, or to civil proceedings to which the Crown is a party, shall be construed as including a reference to civil proceedings to which the Attorney-General or any officer of the Crown as such is a party: Provided that the Crown shall not for the purposes of Parts I11 and IV be deemed to be a party to any proceedings by reason only that they are brought by the Attorney-General upon the relation of some other person. (4) Any reference in this Act to the armed forces of the Crown shall be construed as including a reference to the following forces- (a) the Women's Royal Naval Service; (b) the Queen Alexandra's Royal Naval Nursing Service; and (6) any other organization established under the control of the Admiralty, the Army Council or the Air Council. LAWS OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA Crown Proceedings (CAP. 121 5 (5) References in this Act to any enactment shall be construed as references to that enactment as amended by or under any other enactment including this Act. PART I (1) Where after the commencement of this Act any Right to sue the 3. Crown. person has a claim against the Crown as defined in subsec- tion (2) then, subject to the provisions of this Act, the claim may be enforced as of right, and without the consent of the Governor-General, by proceedings taken against the Crown for that purpose in accordance with the provisions of this Act. (2) The reference to a claim against the Crown in subsection (1) shall be construed as meaning a claim against the Government which, if this Act had not been passed, might have been enforced, subject to the consent of the Governor- General, in a suit instituted by the claimant as plaintiff against the Attorney-General as defendant in accordance with the provisions of the Crown Suits Act or might have been en- 1011907 forced by a proceeding provided by any other statutory provision. (3) Any claim against the Crown made pursuant to any statutory provision enacted after the commencement of this Act shall, unless otherwise directed by any law, be likewise enforced as of right, and without the fiat of the Governor- General, by proceedings taken against the Crown in accord- ance with the provisions of this Act. 4. (1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, the Crown CrownLiability in oftort. the shall be subject to all those liabilities in tort to which, if it were a private person of full age and capacity, it would be subject- (a) in respect of torts committed by its servants or agents; (6) in respect of any breach of those duties which a person owes to his servants or agents at common law by reason of being their employer; and (c) in respect of any breach of the duties attaching at common law to the ownership, occupation, posses- sion or control of property: LAWS OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA CAP. 121) Crown Proceedings Provided that no proceedings shall lie against the Crown by virtue of paragraph (a) in respect of any act or omission of a servant or agent of the Crown unless the act or omission would apart from the provisions of this Act have given rise to a cause of action in tort against that servant or agent or his estate. (2) Where the Crown is bound by a statutory duty which is binding also upon persons other than the Crown and its officers, then, subject to the provisions of this Act, the Crown shall, in respect of a failure to comply with that duty, be subject to all those liabilities in tort (if any) to which it would be so subject if it were a private person of full age and capacity. (3) Where any functions are conferred or imposed upon an officer of the Crown as such either by any rule of the common law or by any law, and that officer commits a tort while performing or purporting to perform those functions, the liabilities of the Crown in respect of the tort shall be such as they would have been if those functions had been conferred or imposed solely by virtue of instructions lawful- ly given by the Crown. (4) Any enactment which negatives or limits the amount of the liability of the Crown or an officer of the Crown in respect of any tort committed by such officer shall, in case of proceedings against the Crown under this section in respect of a tort committed by such officer, apply in relation to the Crown as it would have applied in relation to such officer if the proceedings against the Crown had been proceedings against the said officer. (5) No proceedings shall lie against the Crown by virtue of this section in respect of anything done or omitted to be done by any person while discharging or purporting to discharge any responsibilities of a judicial nature vested in him, or any responsibilities which he has in connection with the execution of judicial process. (6) No proceedings shall lie against the Crown by virtue of this section in respect of any act, neglect or default of any officer of the Crown, unless that officer has been directly LAWS OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA Crown Proceedings (CAP. 121 7 or indirectly appointed by the Crown and was at the material time paid in respect of his duties as an officer of the Crown wholly out of the general revenue or other government funds of Antigua and Barbuda, or was at the material time holding an office in respect of which the Governor-General certifies that the holder thereof would normally be so paid. 5. (1) Where after the commencement of this Act any Fovisipns as to servant or agent of the Crown infringes a patent, or infringes ~d,;:,:1: a registered trade mark, or infringes any copyright and the infringement is committed with the authority of the Crown, then, subject to the provisions of this Act, civil proceedings in respect of the infringement shall lie against the Crown.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guidance Note
    Guidance note The Crown Estate – Escheat All general enquiries regarding escheat should be Burges Salmon LLP represents The Crown Estate in relation addressed in the first instance to property which may be subject to escheat to the Crown by email to escheat.queries@ under common law. This note is a brief explanation of this burges-salmon.com or by complex and arcane aspect of our legal system intended post to Escheats, Burges for the guidance of persons who may be affected by or Salmon LLP, One Glass Wharf, interested in such property. It is not a complete exposition Bristol BS2 0ZX. of the law nor a substitute for legal advice. Basic principles English land law has, since feudal times, vested in the joint tenants upon a trust determine the bankrupt’s interest and been based on a system of tenure. A of land. the trustee’s obligations and liabilities freeholder is not an absolute owner but • Freehold property held subject to a trust. with effect from the date of disclaimer. a“tenant in fee simple” holding, in most The property may then become subject Properties which may be subject to escheat cases, directly from the Sovereign, as lord to escheat. within England, Wales and Northern Ireland paramount of all the land in the realm. fall to be dealt with by Burges Salmon LLP • Disclaimer by liquidator Whenever a “tenancy in fee simple”comes on behalf of The Crown Estate, except for In the case of a company which is being to an end, for whatever reason, the land in properties within the County of Cornwall wound up in England and Wales, the liquidator may, by giving the prescribed question may become subject to escheat or the County Palatine of Lancaster.
    [Show full text]
  • LIS-133: Antigua and Barbuda: Archipelagic and Other Maritime
    United States Department of State Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs Limits in the Seas No. 133 Antigua and Barbuda: Archipelagic and other Maritime Claims and Boundaries LIMITS IN THE SEAS No. 133 ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA ARCHIPELAGIC AND OTHER MARITIME CLAIMS AND BOUNDARIES March 28, 2014 Office of Ocean and Polar Affairs Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs U.S. Department of State This study is one of a series issued by the Office of Ocean and Polar Affairs, Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs in the Department of State. The purpose of the series is to examine a coastal State’s maritime claims and/or boundaries and assess their consistency with international law. This study represents the views of the United States Government only on the specific matters discussed therein and does not necessarily reflect an acceptance of the limits claimed. This study, and earlier studies in this series, may be downloaded from http://www.state.gov/e/oes/ocns/opa/c16065.htm. Comments and questions should be emailed to [email protected]. Principal analysts for this study are Brian Melchior and Kevin Baumert. 1 Introduction This study analyzes the maritime claims and maritime boundaries of Antigua and Barbuda, including its archipelagic baseline claim. The Antigua and Barbuda Maritime Areas Act, 1982, Act Number 18 of August 17, 1982 (Annex 1 to this study), took effect September 1, 1982, and established a 12-nautical mile (nm) territorial sea, 24-nm contiguous zone and 200-nm exclusive economic zone (EEZ).1 Pursuant to Act No.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory, Application and the Canon: the Case of Mill and Jevons
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book Jepson School of Leadership Studies chapters and other publications 2001 Theory, Application and the canon: The ac se of Mill and Jevons Sandra J. Peart University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/jepson-faculty-publications Part of the Economic Theory Commons, and the Political Economy Commons Recommended Citation Peart, Sandra J. "Theory, Application and the Canon: The asC e of Mill and Jevons." Reflections on the Classical Canon in Economics: Essays in Honor of Samuel Hollander. Ed. Evelyn L. Forget and Sandra J. Peart. London: Routledge, 2001. 356-77. Print. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Jepson School of Leadership Studies at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book chapters and other publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 19 Theory, application and the canon The case of Mill and Jevons Sandra Peart Boundary questions, it has been well said, are always perplexing. (Economist 1882: 845) Introduction Whatever disputes remain about the nature and content of the "canon" of economics, it is widely accepted that the boundary of economic science was narrowed throughout the nineteenth century (Winch 1972). This chapter offers a partial explanation for that narrowing in the methodological develop­ ments that occurred during the second half of the century. For reasons of practicality in the face of pronounced "multiplicity of cause," John Stuart Mill called, ~n his 1836 Essay On the Definition ofPolitical Economy; and on the Method of Investigation Proper to It, and again in his 1843 Logi,c, for a separate and specialized science of political economy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Monarchy in Prince Edward Island
    The Monarchy in Prince Edward Island Canada’s History with the Royal Family per cent of the world’s people. Canada was created in 1867. By most standards, Canada, though a relatively young country, has a long- Constitutional Monarchy standing association with royal families. Thirty-two As a Constitutional Monarch, the Queen’s powers are kings and queens reigned over the country long before exercised by the Prime Minister or Premier who are Elizabeth II was crowned Queen of Canada. Canada responsible to the elected representatives of the people was explored, settled and grew during the reigns of in the House of Commons and the provincial British monarchs as far back as 1497. legislative assemblies. Though largely symbolic, the Crown is an integral part of our governmental Canada’s Governmental System structure. The Canadian Constitution limits the power and the Monarchy of the Crown in government, creating a primarily symbolic Canada is a federal state (that is, role for the Queen. Because the it has two levels of government, Queen resides in Britain, she is national and provincial) with a represented in Canada by the constitutional monarchy and a Governor General and in each of parliamentary democracy. Our the provinces by a Lieutenant head of state is the Queen of Governor. Canada. She is also the Queen of the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand and many other Did You Know? countries within the British The Honourable Antoinette Perry Commonwealth of Nations. Acts is our current Lieutenant of parliament and many actions Governor. She was sworn into of our national and provincial office on October 20, 2017 and is nd governments are made in the the 42 Lieutenant Governor of name of the Queen, though the Prince Edward Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Selection Policy OSP2, the Crown Estate, 1975-1985
    OPERATIONAL SELECTION POLICY OSP2 THE CROWN ESTATE 1975-1985 Revised November 2005 1 Authority 1.1 The National Archives’ Acquisition Policy statement announced the Office’s intention of developing, in consultation with departments, Operational Selection Policies across government. These Policies would apply the collection themes described in the policy to the records of individual departments and agencies. 1.2 Operational Selection Policies are intended to be working tools for those involved in the selection of public records. This policy may, therefore, be reviewed and revised in the light of comments received from the users of the records or from archive professionals, the department’s experience of using the policy, or as a result of newly discovered information. There is no formal cycle of review but we would welcome comments at any time. The extent of any review and revision exercise will be determined according to the nature of the comments received. 1.3 If you have any comments upon this policy, please e-mail records- [email protected] or write to: Acquisition and Disposition Policy Manager Records Management Department The National Archives Kew Richmond Surrey TW9 4DU 2 Scope 2.1 This policy relates to the records produced by The Crown Estate in England and Wales and, for marine estates only, Northern Ireland, from 1975 to 1985. It does not cover functions relating to the management of The Crown Estate in Scotland - records of which pass to the National Archives of Scotland. It also excludes records produced by the Managing Agents and others who manage properties in The Crown Estate on behalf of the Commissioners.
    [Show full text]
  • On Liberty John Stuart Mill Batoche Books
    On Liberty John Stuart Mill 1859 Batoche Books Kitchener 2001 Batoche Books Limited 52 Eby Street South Kitchener, Ontario N2G 3L1 Canada email: [email protected] Contents Chapter 1: Introductory...................................................................... 6 Chapter 2: Of the Liberty of Thought and Discussion. .................... 18 Chapter 3: Of Individuality, as one of the Elements of Well-being. 52 Chapter 4: Of the Limits to the Authority of Society over the Indi- vidual. ........................................................................................ 69 Chapter 5: Applications. .................................................................. 86 Notes .............................................................................................. 106 Dedication The grand, leading principle, towards which every argument unfolded in these pages directly converges, is the absolute and essential impor- tance of human development in its richest diversity. Wilhelm von Humboldt: Sphere and Duties of Government. To the beloved and deplored memory of her who was the inspirer, and in part the author, of all that is best in my writings- the friend and wife whose exalted sense of truth and right was my strongest incitement, and whose approbation was my chief reward—I dedicate this volume. Like all that I have written for many years, it belongs as much to her as to me; but the work as it stands has had, in a very insufficient degree, the inestimable advantage of her revision; some of the most important por- tions having been reserved for a more careful re-examination, which they are now never destined to receive. Were I but capable of interpret- ing to the world one half the great thoughts and noble feelings which are buried in her grave, I should be the medium of a greater benefit to it, than is ever likely to arise from anything that I can write, unprompted and unassisted by her all but unrivalled wisdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 14 Federalism-E
    Volume 14 Federalism-e Canada’s Constitutional Monarchy VERONIKA REICHERT Canadian institution.”2 Does the monarchy play University of Alberta an important, positive role in Canada today? Those who would answer “no” to its importance or its being positive have argued Anytime a royal makes an appearance at that we should abolish the Crown in Canada. an event, great public interest in royalty is However, by looking at the constitutional generated, and with that the monarchy as an structures of Canadian institutions, the design institution is brought to the attention of of our federalist democracy, and aspects of the Canadians and the Commonwealth. There is a Canadian identity, I will show that the popular opinion that the monarchy no longer monarchy does play an important, and positive, plays, and should no longer play, an important role in contemporary Canada. Further, the role in contemporary Canada, and with that a criticisms of the monarchy would be better view that the monarchy is a useless addressed through reform of the role of the appropriation of tradition, or even a harmful Crown, in terms of preserving the important symbol of oppression, the latter view taken by function the monarchy plays as well as being a Marc Chevrier who writes that “the Canadian much more accomplishable task. neomonarchy feeds illusions of false grandeur that have no meaning in America and distract One argument against the monarchy is the people from thinking that they can be that it is viewed as an archaic institution, and sovereign.”1 Others, however, see the thus it should have no place in today’s world, monarchy as an important part of modern and especially not in a federalist democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of the Crown
    proceedings of the British Academy, 89, 171-214 The Origins of the Crown GEORGE GARNETT SECRETEDAWAY IN THE MIDST OF his posthumously published lectures on English constitutional history is one of those thought-provoking observations by Maitland which have lain largely undisturbed for ninety years: There is one term against which I wish to warn you, and that term is ‘the crown’. You will certainly read that the crown does this and the crown does that. As a matter of fact we know that the crown does nothing but lie in the Tower of London to be gazed at by sight-seers. No, the crown is a convenient cover for ignorance: it saves us from asking difficult questions.. Partly under the influence of his reading of German scholars, most notably Gierke, Maitland had begun to address questions of this nature in a series of essays on corporate personality, and in a few luminous, tantalizing pages in the History of English Law? Plucknett conceded that the issues raised by these questions, which he characterized as metaphysical, formed the foundations of legal history, but added, severely, that ‘prolonged contemplation of them may warp the judge- ment.’ Not, of course, that Maitland had been found wanting: Plucknett thought him acutely aware of the potential dangers of abstraction. But less well-seasoned timbers would scarcely bear up under the strain? Plucknett need not have worried. The judgements of Enghsh his- 0 neBritish Academy 1996 Maitland, Constitutional History, p. 418; cf. Pollock and Maitland, i 525: ‘that “metaphor kept in the Tower,” as Tom Paine called it’; E W.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Observations on the Queen, the Crown, the Constitution, and the Courts Warren J Newman*
    Some Observations on the Queen, the Crown, the Constitution, and the Courts Warren J Newman* Canada was established in 1867 as a Dominion Le Canada fut fondé en 1867 comme un under the Crown of the United Kingdom, with dominion sous la Couronne du Royaume-Uni, a Constitution similar in principle to that of the avec une constitution semblable en principe à celle United Kingdom. Th e concept of the Crown has du Royaume-Uni. Le concept de la Couronne evolved over time, as Canada became a fully a évolué au fi l du temps, au fur et à mesure independent state. However in 2017, Canada que le Canada est devenu un état entièrement remains a constitutional monarchy within what indépendant, mais en 2017 le Canada demeure is now the Commonwealth, and the offi ces of the une monarchie constitutionnelle à l’intérieur Queen, the Governor General, and the provincial de ce qui est maintenant le Commonwealth et Lieutenant Governors are constitutionally les fonctions de la Reine, du gouverneur général entrenched. Indeed, in elucidating the meaning et des lieutenants-gouverneurs des provinces ont of the Crown, an abstraction that naturally été constitutionnalisées. En fait, en élucidant le gives rise to academic debate and divergent sens de la Couronne, une abstraction qui donne perspectives, it is important not to lose sight of naturellement lieu à des débats théoriques et des the real person who is Her Majesty, given the points de vue divergents, il est important de ne importance that our constitutional framework pas perdre de vue la vraie personne qui est Sa attaches to her role, status, and powers.
    [Show full text]
  • C Is for Coronations Make Your Own Crown
    C is for Coronations Make your own crown Coronations have taken place at Westminster Abbey for nearly a thousand years. 38 kings and queens have been crowned at the Abbey. The St Edward’s crown is made of gold and is incredibly heavy. It is kept safe at the Tower of London. Have a go at making your own St Edward’s crown You will need: • Thick paper or card • Colouring pencils or felt tips • Scissors • Glue and/or stapler • A strip of paper to fit round your head Instructions 1) Print out the St Edward’s Crown template onto thick paper or card. If you don’t have a printer, you or a grown up could draw out the shape. 2) Colour it in with colouring pencils or felt tips. 3) Cut around the outline. 4) Put some glue at the base of the crown and stick it to the headband. 5) Measure the headband to fit your head and ask a grown up to staple it for you. Or, why not get creative and design your own crown? Make a crown with whatever materials you have in the house. You could use: • Empty cereal boxes as card • Tin foil to cover your crown and make it look silver • Tinsel leftover from Christmas time to add some sparkly decoration Now you are ready for your coronation Minimum people needed: 2 Maximum people needed: 8,000 (Please follow government guidelines around large gatherings!) Cast: One monarch One Archbishop (perfect role for a grown up) Other Roles might include: Ladies/Lords in waiting Choir As many Dukes and Duchesses to watch as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Monarchist League of Canada
    THE MONARCHIST LEAGUE of CANADA Justin Trudeau takes Oath of Office as Prime Minister before Governor General David Johnston. “I do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors. So help me God.” – Canada’s Oath of Allegiance, sworn by many public officials Members of the Canadian Royal Family make frequent homecomings here. In May 2016, Prime Minister Trudeau joined Prince Harry in checking out facilities for the Toronto 2017 Invictus Games, Prince Harry’s sporting event for ill, injured and wounded soldiers and veterans. Our Canadian Monarchy © 2017 by the Monarchist League of Canada. All rights reserved. All images remain the property of their respective owners 2 OUR CANADIAN MONARCHY Canada 150 portrait of The Queen, wearing the Maple Leaf brooch presented to her mother by George VI before their 1939 tour of Canada. Elizabeth II, Queen of Canada The Queen is the representation of all of Canada within one person. Together with her representatives and members of the Royal Family, she promotes “all that is best and most admired in the Canadian ideal”. Governor General Julie Payette gives Royal Assent in the Senate on December 12, 2017. 3 THE MONARCHIST LEAGUE of CANADA Canada: always a monarchy he lands that now comprise modern-day Canada Thave long been reigned over by hereditary leaders. Canada enjoys a history of functioning government that began to evolve centuries before European contact with Indigenous peoples. Many Indigenous groups were headed by a chieftain who was advised by a council of elders, not unlike the series of French and British monarchs in whose name the original colonies of North America were founded.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen Elizabeth II Should Be the Final Head of the Commonwealth
    Opinions July 2012 Queen Elizabeth II should be the final Head of the Commonwealth Professor Philip Murphy and Daisy Cooper Opinions Text © Commonwealth Advisory Bureau The information in this publication is believed to be correct at the time of manufacture. Whilst care has been taken to ensure that the information is accurate, the publisher can accept no responsibility for any errors or omissions or for changes to the details given. Views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of the Commonwealth Advisory Bureau or the publisher. First published 2012 ISBN: 978-0-9571941-7-5 Published by and available from the Commonwealth Advisory Bureau (CA/B) Tel: +44 (0)20 7862 8865 Fax: +44 (0)20 7862 8813 Email: [email protected] Web: www.commonwealthadvisorybureau.org Mail: Commonwealth Advisory Bureau Institute of Commonwealth Studies Senate House University of London London WC1E 7HU United Kingdom Queen Elizabeth II should be the final Head of the Commonwealth Professor Philip Murphy and Daisy Cooper Lurking not far beneath the surface of the current celebrations of the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee is a nagging anxiety: what happens next? Nowhere is this more acute than in Commonwealth circles. The future of the headship of the Commonwealth, a role the Queen has played with such dedication, is in doubt. Should it pass to her heir, Prince Charles? Dig a little deeper and you soon encounter off-the-record expressions of doubt about Charles’s suitability. Amid the rather awkward and embarrassed murmurings that pass for debate on this issue, the cases for and against Charles inheriting the headship have barely been explored or discussed.
    [Show full text]