<<

= Rose : Creating Long‐Term Value MARCH 2010

HR&A ADVISORS, INC. utile Prepared for The Redevelopment Authority 1 1 Urban transformations taking place across North America.

2 Transportation corridors repositioned as civic assets

The , New York City

3 Transportation corridors repositioned as civic assets

Embarcadero and Ferry Building, San Francisco

4 Energizing downtowns

Millennium ,

5 Energizing downtowns

Discovery Green,

6 Energizing downtowns

Fountain Square, Cincinnati

7 This transformation creates local and regional value.

8 The City remains competitive, and public costs are mitigated.

Urban development reduces environmental and municipal costs over time. • 5‐20% on local roads • 8‐15% on water and New recreation space for sewer services urban dwellers • Reduce greenfield development

9 New value is created in surrounding districts

Toronto: growth contained by the Expressway and GO Transit Lines

10 New value is created in surrounding districts

San Francisco: development oriented away from Embarcadero and waterfront.

11 New value is created in surrounding districts

New York City: High Line creates real estate value.

12 New value is created in surrounding districts

10‐15% incremental value

85 new development projects

Complete/ in construction

New York City: High Line creates real estate value. Planned

13 New value is created in surrounding districts

Hudson Park Millennium Park Toronto Don River Naturalization 20% of increase in Greenwich Village 25% of incremental residential value in 1‐3% property value increment property values from 2002‐2005. the surrounding district in the first 10 increases property value by years ($1.4 billion) $200‐400 million

14 The Greenway’s value creation to date. Methodology

15 Measuring the Greenway’s contribution.

Approach: • Evaluate change in assessed values from 1995 through 2009. • Control for exogenous real estate trends including new real estate development. • Assess magnitude of pipeline development and land speculation. • Control for variations in the data set.

16 Public infrastructure development timeline

Planning and Early Construction Heavy Greenway Creation Construction

5 0 5 0 5 0 198 199 199 200 200 201

1985: FEIS is 1991: Construction 1999: 2004: Elevated 2007 & 2008: approved. on “Big Dig” begins. is 50% complete. opened along Rose is dismantled. Kennedy Greenway.

17 Cyclical nature of real estate market obscures incremental value analysis.

1990s 2000s

18 Comparing growth rates controls for market fluctuations.

Planning Construction Greenway Creation

1990s 2000s

19 HR&A compared growth rates of the Greenway Study Area to the Central Business District.

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY GREENWAY STUDY AREAS

20 The Greenway’s value creation to date. Findings

21 Greenway district exceeds CBD in value.

2005 Assessed Values per Square Foot 2009 Assessed Values per Square Foot

Commercial, Commercial, $101 $290 Greenway Greenway Residential, Residential, $162 $553

Commercial, Commercial, $84 $245 CBD CBD Residential, Residential, $152 $493

$‐ $50 $100 $150 $200 $‐ $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600

22 Speculative bubble: Greenway growth above CBD.

5 0 5 0 5 0 198 199 199 200 200 201

1985: FEIS is 1991: Construction 1999: Big Dig 2004: Elevated 2007 & 2008: Parks approved. on “Big Dig” begins. is 50% complete. Central Artery opened along Rose is dismantled. Kennedy Greenway. 200%

180% +81%

160% +58%

140% CBD Greenway Study Area 120%

100%

80% 1995 2000

23 Pain of construction: Greenway district lags significantly.

5 0 5 0 5 0 198 199 199 200 200 201

1985: FEIS is 1991: Construction 1999: Big Dig 2004: Elevated 2007 & 2008: Parks approved. on “Big Dig” begins. is 50% complete. Central Artery opened along Rose is dismantled. Kennedy Greenway. 200%

180%

160%

140% +38% CBD Greenway Study Area 120% +9% 100%

80% 2000 2005

24 Greenway era: Accelerating rate of growth as district catches up.

5 0 5 0 5 0 198 199 199 200 200 201

1985: FEIS is 1991: Construction 1999: Big Dig 2004: Elevated 2007 & 2008: Parks approved. on “Big Dig” begins. is 50% complete. Central Artery opened along Rose is dismantled. Kennedy Greenway. 200%

180%

160% +47% 140% +36% CBD Greenway Study Area 120%

100%

80% 2005 2009

25 Greenway era: High commercial concentration drives higher rate of growth.

5 0 5 0 5 0 198 199 199 200 200 201

1985: FEIS is 1991: Construction 1999: Big Dig 2004: Elevated 2007 & 2008: Parks approved. on “Big Dig” begins. is 50% complete. Central Artery opened along Rose is dismantled. Kennedy Greenway.

Commercial Residential 200% 200%

180% 180%

160% 160% +50% +49% 140% 140%

120% 120% +20% +18% 100% 100%

80% 80% 2005 2009 2005 2009

26 Value of Greenway Investment: Increased rate of commercial property value growth between Construction Era and Greenway Era.

180%

160%

% 140% 0 5 + 9% 4 CBD 241% + 120% Greenway

% +15

100% +6% 767% increase in growth rate 80% 2000 2005 2009

27 Increase in growth rate of commercial properties generated $3.1 B in property value.

180%

160%

140%

CBD

120% Greenway

100%

80% 2000 2005 2009

28 Transformation of value is long‐term.

29 Reorientation of development to capture value takes time.

13 YEARS

West Side , New York City 173‐176 Perry Street, New York City

30 Reorientation of development to capture value takes time.

12 YEARS

Embarcadero, San Francisco Ferry Building Marketplace, San Francisco

31 Incremental future tax revenue will be generated by incremental value and new investment.

180%

160%

140%

CBD 120% Greenway

100%

80% 2000 2005 2009 … 2025

32 Strong investment to date.

CURRENT AND ONGOING GREENWAY DISTRICT INVESTMENT 4M SF $1.4B

FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ENVELOPE 3-5M SF

33 Placemaking activities will bolster long‐term value creation.

34 Create and activate the open space asset

35 Create and activate the open space asset

Workers Residents Tourists

36 Create a complementary urban district.

37 Attain an adequate standard of O&M

38 Attain an adequate level of O&M funding

State Funding

General Fund

Capital financing Corporate Sponsorships

Dedicated Tax Assessment Philanthropy

Business Improvement District Concessions

Developer Fees Events

City and StateGreenway District Greenway

39 = Rose Kennedy Greenway: Creating Long‐Term Value MARCH 2010

HR&A ADVISORS, INC. utile Prepared for The Boston Redevelopment Authority 40 40