Arxiv:1908.09339V1 [Astro-Ph.IM] 25 Aug 2019 the Necessary Length

Draft version Preprint typeset using LATEX style AASTeX6 v. 1.0 In preparation for submission to Acta Astronautica. Questions and suggestions welcome. THE SPACELINE: A PRACTICAL SPACE ELEVATOR ALTERNATIVE ACHIEVABLE WITH CURRENT TECHNOLOGY Zephyr Penoyre1 and Emily Sandford2 1Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, United Kingdom and 2Dept. of Astronomy, Columbia University, 550 W. 120th Street, New York NY 10027, USA ABSTRACT Perhaps the biggest hurdle to mankind's expansion throughout the Solar System is the prohibitive cost of escaping Earth's gravitational pull. In its many forms the space elevator provides a way to circumvent this cost, allowing payloads to traverse along a cable extending from Earth to orbit. However, modern materials are not strong enough to build a cable capable of supporting its own weight. In this work we present an alternative to the classic space elevator, within reach of modern technology: The Spaceline. By extending a line, anchored on the moon, to deep within Earth's gravity well, we can construct a stable, traversable cable allowing free movement from the vicinity of Earth to the Moon's surface. With current materials, it is feasible to build a cable extending to close to the height of geostationary orbit, allowing easy traversal and construction between the Earth and the Moon. 1. INTRODUCTION geostationary orbit to counteract Earth's gravitational For a vehicle travelling in empty space it's momen- pull. These competing forces put the cable in a large tum, as well as it's energy, comes from it's fuel. It must amount of tension ,and even when the cable has a ta- push heavy material behind it to propel itself forward. pered profile (which minimises the tension), there is a However, if there were a fixed object to push against a large weight of cable close to the Earth which experi- vehicle could generate momentum via friction. Thus if ences huge gravitational forces. we could design a steady cable, in tension, spanning a In comparison, a cable which only hangs into Earth's region of deep-space, we could move along it with solar gravitational well need not be thick or massive. It is power (or any other such source) alone. This can greatly optimal to make it as thin as possible as it extends closer decrease the cost and difficulty of spanning extraterres- to Earth. This means that the gravitational forces the trial distances - and is the reason why the concept of cable feels, and thus the tension, is much reduced. the space elevator (a cable, held vertical by centrifugal This is the basic concept of what we dub the Space- force, from the equator into deep space) is seen a major line. Figure1 shows a conceptual sketch of the spaceline. leap in reducing the cost, and increasing the access, of We will show that with materials and techniques com- human space-travel. parable to what has already been achieved in the fields However, the fundamental limit on a space elevator of manufacturing and spaceflight, such a cable, extend- is whether a material can support its own weight over ing to the height of a geostationary orbit, is theoretically arXiv:1908.09339v1 [astro-ph.IM] 25 Aug 2019 the necessary length. Modern, mass-producible materi- achievable today. Once the cable is constructed, the cost als currently cannot reach this limit, either they break of subsequent spacelines will diminish dramatically, and under their own weight or must be so wide as to be correspondingly greater payloads will be transportable, near implausible to construct and deploy. We may be relatively cheaply, between geostationary orbit and the on the horizon of substantially stronger materials, such Moon. as carbon nanotubes, but the maximum manufacturable This is not a completely novel concept, rather an inde- length of such materials is presently prohibitively short. pendent genesis and derivation of an idea that has been However, there is another way to circumvent this explored in works like Pearson(1979), Pearson et al. problem, and that is to reduce the force on the ca- (2005) and Eubanks & Radley(2016), where it has also ble. Classic space elevators are supported by centrifugal forces, and thus require a large counterweight beyond 2 Penoyre & Sandford been called a Lunar Space Elevator 1. We present the r derivations herein as a full standalone mathematical and D physical description of the concept, one that we and au- thors before us have been surprised to find is eminently plausible and may have been overlooked as a major step in the development of our capacity as a species to move within our solar system. L=D⋅l 2. PRELIMINARIES Before we introduce the construction of the Spaceline itself, it will be useful to define the problem in simple quantities. T(ε)+dT 2.1. Forces in the Earth-Moon system Figure1 shows a simple sketch of the Earth-Moon system, and Table1 gives some relevant physical scales. It will be convenient to work in dimensionless co-ordinates, a(ε) scaled relative to the Earth-Moon distance D. If x is the dx distance from the centre of the Earth to some point, let x=D⋅ε = D⋅dε x = : (1) D Thus, a cable extending from the surface of the moon to some height H above the Earth, would run from = 1 r to h (where H = hD) in our co-ordinates. For − D T(ε) reference, geostationary orbit occurs at geo 0:12 and ≈ + the Lagrange point between the Earth and the Moon, where the gravitational forces of Earth and the Moon dm ⋅ g(ε) balance exactly, occurs at l 0:85. ≈ The Spaceline is held in place primarily by its gravitational attraction to the Earth. It is anchored to the Moon at one end, and the weight of the cable itself keeps it pulled taut, pointing toward Earth, by Earth's gravity. It rotates with the Moon, completing a full rotation once per lunar orbit ( 1 month). As the Moon ∼ is tidally locked, the anchor point will always face di- rectly towards the Earth and we need not worry about 2 π the cable winding itself up. ω~ 1 month In contrast, the classic space elevator is supported by large centrifugal forces, anchored to and co-rotating with H=D⋅h Earth, completing a full rotation once a day. As it is fixed at one point on the Earth's surface, it must always remain vertically above that point. If there were signifi- cant differential rotation, the cable would start to bend R Rgeo and collapse. We save a detailed derivation of the form and forces of the space elevator for Appendix A1. Figure 1. A simple sketch of the Spaceline, with the Earth We can write down the gravitational acceleration act- (radius R), Moon (radius r), Earth-Moon distance (D), ing on a point mass a distance x from Earth and distance and height of geostationary orbit (Rgeo) drawn to scale. Throughout this work, we will rescale the physical coordinates, x, to dimensionless coordinates, , such that the centre of the Earth is at = 0 and the centre of the Moon at 1 A name we avoid so as to highlight the different forces act- = 1. ing upon the cable - namely that the Spaceline does not need centrifugal forces to be in equilibrium The Spaceline 3 M Mass of Earth 5:972 × 1024 kg m Mass of Moon 7:348 × 1022 kg ≈ 0:01 M R Radius of Earth 6; 371 km r Radius of Moon 1; 737 km ≈ 0:27 R D Earth-Moon distance 384; 400 km ≈ 60 R RISS International Space Station altitude ∼ 100 km above Earth's surface ≈ 6; 771 km ≈ 1:06 R Rgeo Geostationary orbit 42; 164 km ≈ 6:6 R L Earth-Moon Lagrange point 1 326; 000 km ≈ 51 R Table 1. The parameters of the Earth-Moon system. The Earth-Moon distance given is the semi-major axis of the Moon's orbit, which is slightly eccentric (e = 0:055). Currently, we do not account for the Moon's eccentricity, but it represents only a small correction to our calculations. D x from the Moon, third term is the centrifugal force, which is generally − GM Gm small (and can be ignored for pedagogically simpler cal- agrav(x) = : (2) x2 − (D x)2 culations with only a minor impact on the results). − Note that we define all accelerations as pointing towards 2.2. Physical constraints on a cable the Earth, such that they will be negative close to the A few simple parameters, intrinsic to the material of Moon. which the cable is made, define the physical capabili- In the co-rotating Earth-Moon frame, the centre of ties of a cable in tension. Ignoring defects and wear, mass is at a material will break when the stress (force per unit 2 m xc:o:m: = D: (3) m + M cross-sectional area a) exceeds some critical value, the breaking stress B. Thus, a heavier load and larger force The Earth-Moon frame rotates with an angular velocity can be accommodated by a cable made of stronger ma- r G(M + m) terial (higher B) or a cable with larger cross-sectional ! = : (4) area (higher a). D3 The density of the material, ρ, which can reasonably Thus the centrifugal acceleration is be assumed to be constant and intrinsic to the material, 2 G(M + m) mD will also be important. Most of the load a cable must acent(x) = (xc:o:m: x)! = x : − D3 M + m − bear is its own weight.

Load more