DOCSLIB.ORG

Space Elevator a New Way to Gain Orbit Adil Oubou 5/3/2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Space Elevator a New Way to Gain Orbit Adil Oubou 5/3/2014 Space Elevator A New Way To Gain Orbit Adil Oubou 5/3/2014 Abstract After 56 years of great space exploration, the space flight program found itself asking an intriguing question: What’s next? Should humans constrain the space program to low Earth orbit, revisit the moon, or simply go beyond anything they have done before? No matter what the next step is, there is a great need for a reliable, safe, affordable and easy method of gaining orbit. The space elevator concept discussed in this report, based on the design provided in Peter Swan’s book “Space Elevators: An Assessment of the Technological Feasibility and the Way Forward“, shines the light on an economically and technologically feasible solution within the next two decades that will lift payloads including humans from the earth’s surface into space at a greater capacity than current rockets while significantly lowering cost to $500/kg. The system design includes a tether line that extends from the Earth’s surface to an altitude of 100,000 km that utilizes electrical motor driven climbers to gain orbit. The success feasibility of this space flight system is highly dependent on the development of Carbon Nanotube (CNT) material, which will provide high strength and low mass properties for the space elevator system components to withstand environmental and operational stresses. Table of Contents 1.0 The New Way to Orbit ....................................................................................................... 4 2.0 Why Space Elevator? ......................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Purpose ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Advantages ................................................................................................................................ 4 3.0 System Architecture .......................................................................................................... 5 3.1 System Overview ....................................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Climbers .................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2.1 Mass Budget ............................................................................................................................... 7 3.2.2 Motor Drive Apparatus ............................................................................................................... 7 3.2.3 Power Requirements ................................................................................................................... 7 3.3 Tether ........................................................................................................................................ 8 3.3.1 Design Requirements .................................................................................................................. 8 3.3.2 Tether Material ........................................................................................................................... 8 3.4 GEO Node Spacecraft ................................................................................................................ 10 3.5 Marine Node ............................................................................................................................ 10 3.6 Apex Anchor ............................................................................................................................. 11 4.0 Concept of Operation ...................................................................................................... 11 4.1 Pre-mission .............................................................................................................................. 11 4.2 Flight .................................................................................................................................... 12 5.0 Cost Estimates ................................................................................................................ 12 6.0 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 13 ReFerences ............................................................................................................................ 14 2 List of Figures Figure 1. System Diagram of the Space Elevator ........................................................................................ 5 Figure 2. Space Elevator Orbital Dynamics ................................................................................................ 6 Figure 3. Climber Design Model ................................................................................................................. 6 List of Tables Table 1. Climber Subsystem Mass Breakdown [kg] .................................................................................... 7 Table 2. Forces Experienced for the 7 Climbers Operation ......................................................................... 8 Table 3. Tether Carbon Nanotube Characteristics ....................................................................................... 9 Table 4. Design Requirements for the Marine Node ................................................................................. 11 Table 5. Climb Phase Breakdown ............................................................................................................. 12 Table 6. Initial Capital Cost for Space Elevator .......................................................................................... 12 Table 7. Operational Cost of Space Elevator ............................................................................................. 12 3 1.0 The New Way to Orbit The unknown drives humans. Space exploration was essentially derived from that concept. However, beyond our natural curiosity, new concepts such as energy shortage, atmospheric pollution and the chance of high impact global catastrophe are driving humans to extend our existence beyond Earth. Although we have experienced significant advancements in space flight technologies over the last four decades, they are just not up to par for us humans to achieve our ambitious space travel goals. Current rockets are expensive, time-heavy and environmentally harmful. There is a great need for a method to gain orbit that will open up the solar system for exploration and take humans to heights never before reached, while having minimum environmental impact. Could this be a space elevator? Over the past decade, the space elevator concept has moved from a fictional Star Treck point of view, to a feasible megaproject that will lift payloads and eventually people from the Earth’s surface into space at much lower costs. This report explores the popular space elevator tether design concept and its technical feasibility within the near future. 2.0 Why Space Elevator? 2.1 Purpose The space elevator system will lift payload as well as humans from the earth’s surface into space at a greater capacity than current rockets, in a safe, reliable and routine manner for an estimated low cost of $500/kg. Achieving a method to reach the GEO altitude will open the doors for the following important missions: Ø Space transportation station Ø Assembly station for spacecrafts Ø Space tourism & colonization 2.2 Advantages § Low cost to GEO § Easy delivery to GEO within a week § Reliable and routine operations § Access to orbiting satellites (daily launches) § Low g’s (human spaceflight) § Safe § Environmentally friendly § Permanent infrastructure § No consumption of fuel § High cargo capacity § No space Debris § Allow for space systems to be § Floating launch facility designed and constructed 4 3.0 System Architecture 3.1 System Overview The system consists of a 100,000km long tether balanced about a node in geosynchronous orbit (GEO) and extending down to an anchor point on Earth, and up to an apex anchor at an altitude of 100,000km. Tether climbers, which are electrically powered spacecrafts, will serve as the elevator cabins that will travel up or down the tether from earth’s surface to the apex anchor, where their speed is sufficient enough for interplanetary travel. Figure 1 shows the space elevator system nodal layout along the tether line. Figure 1. System Diagram of the Space Elevator It is important to consider the system dynamics of the tether elevator from Earth’s surface to the 100,000 km altitude in space. Close to the Earth’s surface, the gravitational forces are strong, decreasing as a function of altitude as the elevator climbs to space. On the other hand, the centrifugal forces acting on the space elevator, which point away from Earth are weaker near Earth’s surface and get stronger as the elevator goes up in altitude. In order to have a balanced tether line for the elevator, the forces acting on the elevator above the GEO point, must be balanced with the forces acting below the GEO node. On the other hand, the angular momentum must also be balanced around the GEO node, to keep the elevator stable. Considering the mass below the GEO would be significantly heavy, the apex anchor will serve as a counterweight to keep the dynamics of the elevator balanced and stable. Since the GEO will be the center of mass, it will experience the highest magnitudes of stress, therefore requiring a thicker tether compared to near the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NIAC 2002-2003 Annual Report
    TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................................................1 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Summary ................................................................................................................................................................2 Call for Proposals CP 01-01 (Phase II)...................................................................................................................2 Call for Proposals CP 01-02 (Phase I)....................................................................................................................3 Call for Proposals CP 02-01 (Phase II)...................................................................................................................4 Call for Proposals CP 02-02 (Phase I)....................................................................................................................5 Phase II Site Visits..................................................................................................................................................5 Infusion of Advanced Concepts into NASA.............................................................................................................6 Survey of Technologies to Enable NIAC Concepts.................................................................................................8 Special Recognition for NIAC Concept ...................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Tensile Strength of C/C Composites
    16 TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPOSITE MATERIALS TENSILE STRENGTH OF C/C COMPOSITES Jun Koyanagi*, Hiroshi Hatta*, Yasuo Kogo**, Ichiro Shiota*** *Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, **Department of Materials Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science *** Department of Materials Science and Technology, Kogakuin University Keywords : C/C composites, tensile strength, fracture mechanism ABSTRACT changing heat treatment temperature, and the tensile Fracture mechanism and model based on it in strength and interfacial strength were measured. In Carbon-carbon composites are studied. Interfacial addition, comparing these results with their fracture strength between reinforcing fiber and matrix is a patterns, a tensile fracture model of C/Cs was potential candidate governing the tensile fracture of proposed. C/Cs. However, The mechanisms connecting the tensile strength and the factor have not yet been 2. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE clarified. In the present study, tensile fracture 2.1 Materials patterns of various C/C composites with changing Two types of C/Cs were examined. These the interfacial strength were observed in detail, and C/Cs were different only in their reinforcing fibers, a fundamental tensile fracture model of C/C K321 and K633 by Mitsubishi Sanshi Co. Japan. composites in accordance with the experimental These fibers were fabricated from the same observations were proposed. The analytical result precursor but differed only in HTT. Hereafter, the shows reasonable agreement with the experimental C/Cs reinforced with K321 and K633 will be results, and verifies that the fracture mechanism is referred to as K321-C/C and K633-C/C, respectively. consistent. Both C/Cs were of a symmetric 0°/90° cross-ply lamination, fabricated from carbon fiber reinforced phenolic resin matrix composites, CFRPs, with a 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Cislunar Tether Transport System
    FINAL REPORT on NIAC Phase I Contract 07600-011 with NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts, Universities Space Research Association CISLUNAR TETHER TRANSPORT SYSTEM Report submitted by: TETHERS UNLIMITED, INC. 8114 Pebble Ct., Clinton WA 98236-9240 Phone: (206) 306-0400 Fax: -0537 email: [email protected] www.tethers.com Report dated: May 30, 1999 Period of Performance: November 1, 1998 to April 30, 1999 PROJECT SUMMARY PHASE I CONTRACT NUMBER NIAC-07600-011 TITLE OF PROJECT CISLUNAR TETHER TRANSPORT SYSTEM NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION (Firm Name, Mail Address, City/State/Zip Tethers Unlimited, Inc. 8114 Pebble Ct., Clinton WA 98236-9240 [email protected] PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Robert P. Hoyt, Ph.D. ABSTRACT The Phase I effort developed a design for a space systems architecture for repeatedly transporting payloads between low Earth orbit and the surface of the moon without significant use of propellant. This architecture consists of one rotating tether in elliptical, equatorial Earth orbit and a second rotating tether in a circular low lunar orbit. The Earth-orbit tether picks up a payload from a circular low Earth orbit and tosses it into a minimal-energy lunar transfer orbit. When the payload arrives at the Moon, the lunar tether catches it and deposits it on the surface of the Moon. Simultaneously, the lunar tether picks up a lunar payload to be sent down to the Earth orbit tether. By transporting equal masses to and from the Moon, the orbital energy and momentum of the system can be conserved, eliminating the need for transfer propellant. Using currently available high-strength tether materials, this system could be built with a total mass of less than 28 times the mass of the payloads it can transport.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Mechanical Properties of Composite Materials with a Dammar-Based Hybrid Matrix and Two Types of Flax Fabric Reinforcement
    polymers Article A Study of the Mechanical Properties of Composite Materials with a Dammar-Based Hybrid Matrix and Two Types of Flax Fabric Reinforcement Dumitru Bolcu † and Marius Marinel St˘anescu*,† Department of Mechanics, University of Craiova, 165 Calea Bucure¸sti,200620 Craiova, Romania; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +40-740-355-079 † These authors contributed equally to this work. Received: 7 July 2020; Accepted: 22 July 2020; Published: 24 July 2020 Abstract: The need to protect the environment has generated, in the past decade, a competition at the producers’ level to use, as much as possible, natural materials, which are biodegradable and compostable. This trend and the composite materials have undergone a spectacular development of the natural components. Starting from these tendencies we have made and studied from the point of view of mechanical and chemical properties composite materials with three types of hybrid matrix based on the Dammar natural hybrid resin and two types of reinforcers made of flax fabric. We have researched the mechanical properties of these composite materials based on their tensile strength and vibration behavior, respectively. We have determined the characteristic curves, elasticity modulus, tensile strength, elongation at break, specific frequency and damping factor. Using SEM (Scanning Electron Microscopy) analysis we have obtained images of the breaking area for each sample that underwent a tensile test and, by applying FTIR (Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy) and EDS (Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy) analyzes, we have determined the spectrum bands and the chemical composition diagram of the samples taken from the hybrid resins used as a matrix for the composite materials under study.
    [Show full text]
  • Graphene Infused Space Industry a Discussion About Graphene
    Graphene infused space industry a discussion about graphene NASA Commercial Space Lecture Series Our agenda today Debbie Nelson The Nixene Journal Rob Whieldon Introduction to graphene and Powder applications Adrian Nixon State of the art sheet graphene manufacturing technology Interactive session: Ask anything you like Rob Whieldon Adrian Nixon Debbie Nelson American Graphene Summit Washington D.C. 2019 https://www.nixenepublishing.com/nixene-publishing-team/ Who we are Rob Whieldon Rob Whieldon is Operations Director for Nixene Publishing having spent over 20 years supporting businesses in the SME community in the UK. He was the Executive Director of the prestigious Goldman Sachs 10,000 Small Businesses Adrian Nixon Debbie Nelson programme in Yorkshire and Humber and Adrian began his career as a scientist and is a Chartered Chemist and Debbie has over two decades is the former Director of Small Business Member of the Royal Society of experience in both face-forward and Programmes at Leeds University Business Chemistry. He has over 20 years online networking. She is active with School. He is a Gold Award winner from experience in industry working at ongoing NASA Social activities, and the UK Government Small Business Allied Colloids plc, an international enjoyed covering the Orion capsule Charter initiative and a holder of the EFMD chemicals company (now part of water test and Apollo 50th (European Framework for Management BASF). Adrian is the CEO and Editor anniversary events at Marshall Development) Excellence in Practice in Chief of Nixene Publishing, which Space Center. Debbie serves as Award. More recently he was a judge for he established in the UK in 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathways to Colonization David V
    Pathways To Colonization David V. Smitherman, Jr. NASA, Marshall Space F’light Center, Mail CoLFDO2, Huntsville, AL 35812,256-961-7585, Abstract. The steps required for space colonization are many to grow fiom our current 3-person International Space Station,now under construction, to an inhstmcture that can support hundreds and eventually thousands of people in space. This paper will summarize the author’s fmdings fiom numerous studies and workshops on related subjects and identify some of the critical next steps toward space colonization. Findings will be drawn from the author’s previous work on space colony design, space infirastructure workshops, and various studies that addressed space policy. In cmclusion, this paper will note that siBnifcant progress has been made on space facility construction through the International Space Station program, and that si&icant efforts are needed in the development of new reusable Earth to Orbit transportation systems. The next key steps will include reusable in space transportation systems supported by in space propellant depots, the continued development of inflatable habitat and space elevator technologies, and the resolution of policy issues that will establish a future vision for space development A PATH TO SPACE COLONIZATION In 1993, as part of the author’s duties as a space program planner at the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, a lengthy timeline was begun to determine the approximate length of time it might take for humans to eventually leave this solar system and travel to the stars. The thought was that we would soon discover a blue planet around another star and would eventually seek to send a colony to explore and expand our presence in this galaxy.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Propulsion.Pdf
    Deep Space Propulsion K.F. Long Deep Space Propulsion A Roadmap to Interstellar Flight K.F. Long Bsc, Msc, CPhys Vice President (Europe), Icarus Interstellar Fellow British Interplanetary Society Berkshire, UK ISBN 978-1-4614-0606-8 e-ISBN 978-1-4614-0607-5 DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-0607-5 Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London Library of Congress Control Number: 2011937235 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) This book is dedicated to three people who have had the biggest influence on my life. My wife Gemma Long for your continued love and companionship; my mentor Jonathan Brooks for your guidance and wisdom; my hero Sir Arthur C. Clarke for your inspirational vision – for Rama, 2001, and the books you leave behind. Foreword We live in a time of troubles.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Planes and Space Tourism: the Industry and the Regulation of Its Safety
    Space Planes and Space Tourism: The Industry and the Regulation of its Safety A Research Study Prepared by Dr. Joseph N. Pelton Director, Space & Advanced Communications Research Institute George Washington University George Washington University SACRI Research Study 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary…………………………………………………… p 4-14 1.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. p 16-26 2.0 Methodology…………………………………………………………………….. p 26-28 3.0 Background and History……………………………………………………….. p 28-34 4.0 US Regulations and Government Programs………………………………….. p 34-35 4.1 NASA’s Legislative Mandate and the New Space Vision………….……. p 35-36 4.2 NASA Safety Practices in Comparison to the FAA……….…………….. p 36-37 4.3 New US Legislation to Regulate and Control Private Space Ventures… p 37 4.3.1 Status of Legislation and Pending FAA Draft Regulations……….. p 37-38 4.3.2 The New Role of Prizes in Space Development…………………….. p 38-40 4.3.3 Implications of Private Space Ventures…………………………….. p 41-42 4.4 International Efforts to Regulate Private Space Systems………………… p 42 4.4.1 International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety… p 42-43 4.4.2 The International Telecommunications Union (ITU)…………….. p 43-44 4.4.3 The Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS).. p 44 4.4.4 The European Aviation Safety Agency…………………………….. p 44-45 4.4.5 Review of International Treaties Involving Space………………… p 45 4.4.6 The ICAO -The Best Way Forward for International Regulation.. p 45-47 5.0 Key Efforts to Estimate the Size of a Private Space Tourism Business……… p 47 5.1.
    [Show full text]
  • All About Fibers
    RawRaw MaterialsMaterials ¾ More than half the mix is silica sand, the basic building block of any glass. ¾ Other ingredients are borates and trace amounts of specialty chemicals. Return © 2003, P. Joyce BatchBatch HouseHouse && FurnaceFurnace ¾ The materials are blended together in a bulk quantity, called the "batch." ¾ The blended mix is then fed into the furnace or "tank." ¾ The temperature is so high that the sand and other ingredients dissolve into molten glass. Return © 2003, P. Joyce BushingsBushings ¾The molten glass flows to numerous high heat-resistant platinum trays which have thousands of small, precisely drilled tubular openings, called "bushings." Return © 2003, P. Joyce FilamentsFilaments ¾This thin stream of molten glass is pulled and attenuated (drawn down) to a precise diameter, then quenched or cooled by air and water to fix this diameter and create a filament. Return © 2003, P. Joyce SizingSizing ¾The hair-like filaments are coated with an aqueous chemical mixture called a "sizing," which serves two main purposes: 1) protecting the filaments from each other during processing and handling, and 2) ensuring good adhesion of the glass fiber to the resin. Return © 2003, P. Joyce WindersWinders ¾ In most cases, the strand is wound onto high-speed winders which collect the continuous fiber glass into balls or "doffs.“ Single end roving ¾ Most of these packages are shipped directly to customers for such processes as pultrusion and filament winding. ¾ Doffs are heated in an oven to dry the chemical sizing. Return © 2003, P. Joyce IntermediateIntermediate PackagePackage ¾ In one type of winding operation, strands are collected into an "intermediate" package that is further processed in one of several ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Research on Laser-TIG Hybrid Welding of 6061-T6 Aluminum Alloys Joint and Post Heat Treatment
    metals Article Research on Laser-TIG Hybrid Welding of 6061-T6 Aluminum Alloys Joint and Post Heat Treatment Hongyang Wang * , Xiaohong Liu and Liming Liu Key Laboratory of Liaoning Advanced Welding and Joining Technology & School of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China; [email protected] (X.L.); [email protected] (L.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 22 November 2019; Accepted: 7 January 2020; Published: 15 January 2020 Abstract: The 6061-T6 aluminum (Al) alloys was joined by the laser induced tungsten inert gas (TIG) hybrid welding technique. It mainly studied the influences of welding parameters, solution, and aging (STA) treatment on the microstructure and tensile properties of Al alloy hybrid welding joints. Microstructures of the joints were also analyzed by optical microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. Results showed that the laser induced arc hybrid welding source changed the microstructure of the fusion zone and heat effect zone. STA treatment effectively improved the mechanical properties of the softening area in the hybrid welding joint, whose values of the tensile strength and elongation were on average 286 MPa and 20.5%. The distribution of the reinforcement phases and dislocations distributed were more uniform, which improved the property of STA treated joint. Keywords: Al alloy; laser induced arc hybrid welding; heat treatment; microstructure 1. Introduction Aluminum alloys are used as structural materials, due to the high strength, excellent corrosion resistance, and low density, which makes them promising alternatives to steels for lightweight structures such as vehicles and airplanes [1–7]. Aluminum alloys are also extensively used in aviation, vessel, and electronics industries due to their light weight, high specific strength, good corrosion resistance, and excellent mechanical properties [8–16].
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Space Elevator Technology
    Analysis of Space Elevator Technology SPRING 2014, ASEN 5053 FINAL PROJECT TYSON SPARKS Contents Figures .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Tables ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Analysis of Space Elevator Technology ........................................................................................................................ 2 Nomenclature ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 I. Introduction and Theory ....................................................................................................................................... 2 A. Modern Elevator Concept ................................................................................................................................. 2 B. Climber Concept ............................................................................................................................................... 3 C. Base Station Concept ........................................................................................................................................ 4 D. Space Elevator Astrodynamics ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fatigue of Ti-6Al-4V
    Chapter 3 Fatigue of Ti-6Al-4V Shabnam Hosseini Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/45753 1. Introduction Metallic biomaterials have essentially three fields of use; these are the artificial hip joints, screw, plates and nails for internal fixation of fractures, and dental implants. Any of these devices must support high mechanical load and resistance of material against breakage is essential. High mechanical properties are needed for structural efficiency of surgical and dental implants. But their volume is restricted by anatomic realities what require good yield and fatigue strengths of metal [1]. The use of titanium alloys is due to their excellent corrosion resistance. Also, that is because of their tensile strength, a high strength to weight ratio and low elastic modulus. Titanium continues to be widely used in biomedical applications. Ti-6Al-4V alloy is the most frequently used these days [2]. Fatigue fracture and wear have been identified as some of the major problems associated with implant loosening, stress-shielding and ultimate implant failure. Although wear is commonly reported in orthopedic applications such as knee and hip joint prostheses, it is also a serious and often fatal experience in mechanical heart valves. Fig.1 illustrates some examples of fatigue fracture of implant devices in the hip prosthesis and a mechanical heart valve. It can be seen that fatigue-wear interaction plays a significant role in ultimate failure of these medical devices [3]. In orthopedic implants design, it is unavoidable the presence of geometrical fillets such as notches which cause stress locally.
    [Show full text]