DOCSLIB.ORG

Cislunar Tether Transport System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cislunar Tether Transport System FINAL REPORT on NIAC Phase I Contract 07600-011 with NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts, Universities Space Research Association CISLUNAR TETHER TRANSPORT SYSTEM Report submitted by: TETHERS UNLIMITED, INC. 8114 Pebble Ct., Clinton WA 98236-9240 Phone: (206) 306-0400 Fax: -0537 email: [email protected] www.tethers.com Report dated: May 30, 1999 Period of Performance: November 1, 1998 to April 30, 1999 PROJECT SUMMARY PHASE I CONTRACT NUMBER NIAC-07600-011 TITLE OF PROJECT CISLUNAR TETHER TRANSPORT SYSTEM NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION (Firm Name, Mail Address, City/State/Zip Tethers Unlimited, Inc. 8114 Pebble Ct., Clinton WA 98236-9240 [email protected] PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Robert P. Hoyt, Ph.D. ABSTRACT The Phase I effort developed a design for a space systems architecture for repeatedly transporting payloads between low Earth orbit and the surface of the moon without significant use of propellant. This architecture consists of one rotating tether in elliptical, equatorial Earth orbit and a second rotating tether in a circular low lunar orbit. The Earth-orbit tether picks up a payload from a circular low Earth orbit and tosses it into a minimal-energy lunar transfer orbit. When the payload arrives at the Moon, the lunar tether catches it and deposits it on the surface of the Moon. Simultaneously, the lunar tether picks up a lunar payload to be sent down to the Earth orbit tether. By transporting equal masses to and from the Moon, the orbital energy and momentum of the system can be conserved, eliminating the need for transfer propellant. Using currently available high-strength tether materials, this system could be built with a total mass of less than 28 times the mass of the payloads it can transport. Using numerical simulations that incorporate the full three-dimensional orbital mechanics and tether dynamics, we have verified the feasibility of this system architecture and developed scenarios for transferring a payload from a low Earth orbit to the surface of the Moon that require less than 25 m/s of thrust for trajectory targeting corrections. In addition, the Phase I effort investigated the feasibility of using a similar tether system to provide rapid round-trip travel between low Earth orbit and low Mars orbit. A key technology required for both tether systems is hardware and techniques for rendezvous between the payloads and the rotating tethers. Automated rendezvous and capture systems currently under testing by NASA should, with further development, be capable of facilitating the tether-payload dockings. By providing a fully reusable infrastructure and by minimizing the need for propellant expenditure, tether transport systems can significantly reduce the cost of frequent travel to and from the Moon and Mars. NIAC Phase I Report TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................1 II. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES..................................................................................................................................2 III. PHASE I RESULTS................................................................................................................................................2 III.A. DESIGN OF THE CISLUNAR TETHER TRANSPORT SYSTEM ...........................................................................3 III.A.1. Cislunar System Architecture ..............................................................................................................3 III.A.2. LEO-to-LTO Tether Boost Facility Design ........................................................................................5 III.A.3. Lunavator™ Design...............................................................................................................................6 III.A.4. Cislunar System Dynamics Verification Through Simulation ...........................................................7 III.A.5. Analyses of Lunar Transfer Targeting.................................................................................................7 III.A.6. Stability Analyses of Lunavator™ Orbits.............................................................................................8 III.A.7. Maintenance of Rotating Tether Orbits by Tether Reeling ................................................................8 III.B. LEO HEFT FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ............................................................................................9 III.C. TETHER SYSTEMS FOR EARTH ⇔ MARS TRANSPORT................................................................................11 III.C.1. Mars-Earth Rapid Interplanetary Tether Transport System .............................................................11 III.C.2. Tether Boost Facility Design for the Human Mars Mission.............................................................12 III.D. COMPARISON TO COMPETING TECHNOLOGIES...........................................................................................13 III.E. HIGH-STRENGTH TETHER MATERIALS.......................................................................................................14 III.F. HIGH-SURVIVABILITY TETHER STRUCTURES ............................................................................................16 III.G. KEY FEASIBILITY ISSUE: PAYLOAD RENDEZVOUS & CAPTURE WITH A ROTATING TETHER..................16 III.H. INCREMENTAL SYSTEM DESIGN .................................................................................................................18 III.H.1. Tether Transport System Technology Design Effort........................................................................19 III.H.2. STOTS: Spinning Tether Orbital Transfer System Experiment......................................................19 III.H.3. TORQUE: Tether Orbit-Raising Qualification Experiment............................................................19 III.H.4. Earth-orbit Tether Boost Facility.......................................................................................................20 III.H.5. Lunavator™ Facility............................................................................................................................20 III.H.6. MarsWhip Tether Facility..................................................................................................................20 IV. SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................................20 APPENDICES A. Design of Earth-Orbit Tether Facilities for Lunar Transfer Orbit Injection B. Lunavatorª Tether and Orbital Design for the Cislunar Transport System C. Cislunar System Dynamics Verification Through Simulation D. Analyses of Lunar Transfer Options E. Stability of Lunavatorª Orbits F. Maintenance of Rotating Tether Orbits by Tether Reeling G. LEO HEFT Facility Design H. Mars-Earth Rapid Interplanetary Tether Transport (MERITT) System, AIAA Paper 99-2151 I. MarsHEFT J. The Hoytetherª K. Momentum-Exchange Tether White Paper L. Cislunar Tether Transport System: AIAA Paper 99-2690 NIAC Phase I Report Tethers Unlimited, Inc. Final Report Cislunar Tether Transport System I. INTRODUCTION Motivation If mankind is to move beyond its current tenuous foothold in low Earth orbit and develop a sustained and prosperous presence on the Moon, Mars, and elsewhere in the solar system, the cost of transporting supplies, equipment, and personnel to these locations must be reduced by several orders of magnitude. The US space program is currently seeking to achieve such cost reductions for Earth-to-orbit transport by developing reusable launch vehicles. To achieve these cost reductions for the in-space propulsive needs of an interplanetary civilization, it will be necessary to develop a highly reusable transportation architecture that minimize the amount of mass that must be launched into orbit to provide in-space propulsion. Background: Momentum-Exchange Tethers Momentum-exchange tethers can provide a means for transporting many payloads without utilizing propellant, and thus can provide the infrastructure of a low-cost in-space transportation system. A momentum-exchange tether is essentially a long, high-strength cable rotating in orbit. This cable can provide a mechanical connection between two objects in orbit, enabling one object to transfer momentum and energy to the other object, much like a hunter can cast a stone with a sling. A momentum-exchange tether facility will consist of a central station, a long, tapered, high-strength cable, and a grapple vehicle at the tether tip. The tether will be deployed from the station, and the system will be induced to spin using tether reeling maneuvers or electrodynamic forces. The direction of tether spin is chosen so that the tether tip is moving behind the tether facilityÕs center-of-mass on its downswing, and moving ahead of it on its upswing, as illustrated in Figure 1. With proper choice of tether orbit and rotation, the tether tip can then rendezvous with a payload when the tether is at the bottom of its swing and later release the payload at the top of its swing, tossing the payload into a higher orbit. The orbital energy and momentum given to the payload comes out of the energy and momentum of the tether facility. The tetherÕs orbit can be restored by reboosting with propellantless electrodynamic tether propulsion or with high specific impulse electric propulsion; alternatively, the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Astrodynamics
    Politecnico di Torino SEEDS SpacE Exploration and Development Systems Astrodynamics II Edition 2006 - 07 - Ver. 2.0.1 Author: Guido Colasurdo Dipartimento di Energetica Teacher: Giulio Avanzini Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aeronautica e Spaziale e-mail: [email protected] Contents 1 Two–Body Orbital Mechanics 1 1.1 BirthofAstrodynamics: Kepler’sLaws. ......... 1 1.2 Newton’sLawsofMotion ............................ ... 2 1.3 Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation . ......... 3 1.4 The n–BodyProblem ................................. 4 1.5 Equation of Motion in the Two-Body Problem . ....... 5 1.6 PotentialEnergy ................................. ... 6 1.7 ConstantsoftheMotion . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... 7 1.8 TrajectoryEquation .............................. .... 8 1.9 ConicSections ................................... 8 1.10 Relating Energy and Semi-major Axis . ........ 9 2 Two-Dimensional Analysis of Motion 11 2.1 ReferenceFrames................................. 11 2.2 Velocity and acceleration components . ......... 12 2.3 First-Order Scalar Equations of Motion . ......... 12 2.4 PerifocalReferenceFrame . ...... 13 2.5 FlightPathAngle ................................. 14 2.6 EllipticalOrbits................................ ..... 15 2.6.1 Geometry of an Elliptical Orbit . ..... 15 2.6.2 Period of an Elliptical Orbit . ..... 16 2.7 Time–of–Flight on the Elliptical Orbit . .......... 16 2.8 Extensiontohyperbolaandparabola. ........ 18 2.9 Circular and Escape Velocity, Hyperbolic Excess Speed . .............. 18 2.10 CosmicVelocities
    [Show full text]
  • Bolden Testimony
    HOLD FOR RELEASE UNTIL PRESENTED BY WITNESS November 17, 2011 Statement of The Honorable Charles F. Bolden, Jr. Administrator National Aeronautics and Space Administration before the Subcommittee on Science and Space Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation U. S. Senate Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today to discuss the outlook for NASA’s human space flight program. This has been a remarkable year, as we have completed assembling and outfitting of the U.S. On-orbit Segment (USOS) of the International Space Station (ISS), allowing us to focus on full utilization of the Station’s research capabilities; taken key steps in moving forward into the future of exploration beyond Low-Earth Orbit (LEO); celebrated the 50 th anniversary of human spaceflight; and witnessed the successful conclusion of the historic Space Shuttle Program. We are also pleased with the progress our industry partners have made in developing an American capability to transport cargo and eventually astronauts to the ISS, and end the outsourcing of this work to foreign governments. More importantly, this will add a critical level of redundancy for transporting cargo and crew to the ISS. A robust transportation architecture is important to ensuring full utilization of this amazing research facility. Enabling commercial crew and cargo transportation systems in LEO allows NASA to focus on developing its own systems for sending astronauts on missions of exploration beyond LEO. This split between commercial and Government systems allows for a cost effective approach to promote a broad base for human exploration by the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Flight Opportunities and Small Spacecraft Technology Program Updates NAC Technology, Innovation and Engineering Committee Meeting | March 19, 2020
    Flight Opportunities and Small Spacecraft Technology Program Updates NAC Technology, Innovation and Engineering Committee Meeting | March 19, 2020 Christopher Baker NASA Space Technology Mission Directorate Flight Opportunities and Small Spacecraft Technology Program Executive National Aeronautics and Space Administration 1 CHANGING THE PACE OF SPACE Through Small Spacecraft Technology and Flight Opportunities, Space Tech is pursuing the rapid identification, development, and testing of capabilities that exploit agile spacecraft platforms and responsive launch capabilities to increase the pace of space exploration, discovery, and the expansion of space commerce. National Aeronautics and Space Administration 2 THROUGH SUBORBITAL FLIGHT The Flight Opportunities program facilitates rapid demonstration of promising technologies for space exploration, discovery, and the expansion of space commerce through suborbital testing with industry flight providers LEARN MORE: WWW.NASA.GOV/TECHNOLOGY Photo Credit: Blue Origin National Aeronautics and Space Administration 3 FLIGHT OPPORTUNITIES BY THE NUMBERS Between 2011 and today… In 2019 alone… Supported 195 successful fights Supported 15 successful fights Enabled 676 tests of payloads Enabled 47 tests of payloads 254 technologies in the portfolio 86 technologies in the portfolio 13 active commercial providers 9 active commercial providers National Aeronautics and Space Administration Numbers current as of March 1, 2020 4 TECHNOLOGY TESTED IN SUBORBITAL Lunar Payloads ISS SPACE IS GOING TO EARTH ORBIT, THE MOON, MARS, AND BEYOND Mars 2020 Commercial Critical Space Lunar Payload Exploration Services Solutions National Aeronautics and Space Administration 5 SUBORBITAL INFUSION HIGHLIGHT Commercial Lunar Payload Services Four companies selected as Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CPLS) providers leveraged Flight Opportunities-supported suborbital flights to test technologies that are incorporated into their landers and/or are testing lunar landing technologies under Flight Opportunities for others.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Propulsion System Scaling for Asteroid Capture-And-Return Missions
    Electric propulsion system scaling for asteroid capture-and-return missions Justin M. Little⇤ and Edgar Y. Choueiri† Electric Propulsion and Plasma Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544 The requirements for an electric propulsion system needed to maximize the return mass of asteroid capture-and-return (ACR) missions are investigated in detail. An analytical model is presented for the mission time and mass balance of an ACR mission based on the propellant requirements of each mission phase. Edelbaum’s approximation is used for the Earth-escape phase. The asteroid rendezvous and return phases of the mission are modeled as a low-thrust optimal control problem with a lunar assist. The numerical solution to this problem is used to derive scaling laws for the propellant requirements based on the maneuver time, asteroid orbit, and propulsion system parameters. Constraining the rendezvous and return phases by the synodic period of the target asteroid, a semi- empirical equation is obtained for the optimum specific impulse and power supply. It was found analytically that the optimum power supply is one such that the mass of the propulsion system and power supply are approximately equal to the total mass of propellant used during the entire mission. Finally, it is shown that ACR missions, in general, are optimized using propulsion systems capable of processing 100 kW – 1 MW of power with specific impulses in the range 5,000 – 10,000 s, and have the potential to return asteroids on the order of 103 104 tons. − Nomenclature
    [Show full text]
  • Project Selene: AIAA Lunar Base Camp
    Project Selene: AIAA Lunar Base Camp AIAA Space Mission System 2019-2020 Virginia Tech Aerospace Engineering Faculty Advisor : Dr. Kevin Shinpaugh Team Members : Olivia Arthur, Bobby Aselford, Michel Becker, Patrick Crandall, Heidi Engebreth, Maedini Jayaprakash, Logan Lark, Nico Ortiz, Matthew Pieczynski, Brendan Ventura Member AIAA Number Member AIAA Number And Signature And Signature Faculty Advisor 25807 Dr. Kevin Shinpaugh Brendan Ventura 1109196 Matthew Pieczynski 936900 Team Lead/Operations Logan Lark 902106 Heidi Engebreth 1109232 Structures & Environment Patrick Crandall 1109193 Olivia Arthur 999589 Power & Thermal Maedini Jayaprakash 1085663 Robert Aselford 1109195 CCDH/Operations Michel Becker 1109194 Nico Ortiz 1109533 Attitude, Trajectory, Orbits and Launch Vehicles Contents 1 Symbols and Acronyms 8 2 Executive Summary 9 3 Preface and Introduction 13 3.1 Project Management . 13 3.2 Problem Definition . 14 3.2.1 Background and Motivation . 14 3.2.2 RFP and Description . 14 3.2.3 Project Scope . 15 3.2.4 Disciplines . 15 3.2.5 Societal Sectors . 15 3.2.6 Assumptions . 16 3.2.7 Relevant Capital and Resources . 16 4 Value System Design 17 4.1 Introduction . 17 4.2 Analytical Hierarchical Process . 17 4.2.1 Longevity . 18 4.2.2 Expandability . 19 4.2.3 Scientific Return . 19 4.2.4 Risk . 20 4.2.5 Cost . 21 5 Initial Concept of Operations 21 5.1 Orbital Analysis . 22 5.2 Launch Vehicles . 22 6 Habitat Location 25 6.1 Introduction . 25 6.2 Region Selection . 25 6.3 Locations of Interest . 26 6.4 Eliminated Locations . 26 6.5 Remaining Locations . 27 6.6 Chosen Location .
    [Show full text]
  • AFSPC-CO TERMINOLOGY Revised: 12 Jan 2019
    AFSPC-CO TERMINOLOGY Revised: 12 Jan 2019 Term Description AEHF Advanced Extremely High Frequency AFB / AFS Air Force Base / Air Force Station AOC Air Operations Center AOI Area of Interest The point in the orbit of a heavenly body, specifically the moon, or of a man-made satellite Apogee at which it is farthest from the earth. Even CAP rockets experience apogee. Either of two points in an eccentric orbit, one (higher apsis) farthest from the center of Apsis attraction, the other (lower apsis) nearest to the center of attraction Argument of Perigee the angle in a satellites' orbit plane that is measured from the Ascending Node to the (ω) perigee along the satellite direction of travel CGO Company Grade Officer CLV Calculated Load Value, Crew Launch Vehicle COP Common Operating Picture DCO Defensive Cyber Operations DHS Department of Homeland Security DoD Department of Defense DOP Dilution of Precision Defense Satellite Communications Systems - wideband communications spacecraft for DSCS the USAF DSP Defense Satellite Program or Defense Support Program - "Eyes in the Sky" EHF Extremely High Frequency (30-300 GHz; 1mm-1cm) ELF Extremely Low Frequency (3-30 Hz; 100,000km-10,000km) EMS Electromagnetic Spectrum Equitorial Plane the plane passing through the equator EWR Early Warning Radar and Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity GBR Ground-Based Radar and Global Broadband Roaming GBS Global Broadcast Service GEO Geosynchronous Earth Orbit or Geostationary Orbit ( ~22,300 miles above Earth) GEODSS Ground-Based Electro-Optical Deep Space Surveillance
    [Show full text]
  • Occdhtlm3newstelter
    OccdhtlM3Newstelter Volume II, Number 10 january, 1981 Occultation Newsletter is published by the International Occultation Timing Association. Editor and Compositor: H. F. DaBo11; 6 N 106 White Oak Lane; St. Charles, IL 60174; U.S.A. Please send editorial matters to the above, but send address changes, requests, matters of circulation, and other IOTA business to IOTA; P.0. Box 596; Tinley Park; IL 60477; U.S.A. NOTICE TO LUNAR OCCULTATION OBSERVERS paho1. by contacting Sr. Francisco Diego Q., Ixpan- tenco 26-bis, Real dc Ids Reyes, Coyoacdn, Mexico, L. V. Morrison D.F., Mexico. Currently, however, the Latin American Section is experiencing problems with funding, and On 1981 January 1 the international centre for the for the time being, it may be necessary for would-be receipt of timings of occultations of stars by the IOTA/LAS members to subscribe to the English-lan- Moon will be transferred from HM Nautical Almanac guage edition of o.n., or to join the parent IOTA. Office, Royal Greenwich Observatory, England to As- tronomical Division, Hydrographic Department, Japan IOTA NEWS "' From that date observers should send their lunar oc- cultation reports and any correspondence connected David W. Dunham with lunar occultations to the following address: As of 1981 January 1, H. M. Nautical Almanac Office, Astronomical Division at the Royal Greenwich Observatory, England, will Hydrographic Department discontinue collecting observations of lunar occul- Tsukiji-5 tations. After that date, observers should send Chuo-ku, Tokyo their reports to the new International Occultation 104 JAPAN Centre in japan, as described in this issue's lead article.
    [Show full text]
  • Aas 11-509 Artemis Lunar Orbit Insertion and Science Orbit Design Through 2013
    AAS 11-509 ARTEMIS LUNAR ORBIT INSERTION AND SCIENCE ORBIT DESIGN THROUGH 2013 Stephen B. Broschart,∗ Theodore H. Sweetser,y Vassilis Angelopoulos,z David C. Folta,x and Mark A. Woodard{ As of late-July 2011, the ARTEMIS mission is transferring two spacecraft from Lissajous orbits around Earth-Moon Lagrange Point #1 into highly-eccentric lunar science orbits. This paper presents the trajectory design for the transfer from Lissajous orbit to lunar orbit in- sertion, the period reduction maneuvers, and the science orbits through 2013. The design accommodates large perturbations from Earth’s gravity and restrictive spacecraft capabili- ties to enable opportunities for a range of heliophysics and planetary science measurements. The process used to design the highly-eccentric ARTEMIS science orbits is outlined. The approach may inform the design of future eccentric orbiter missions at planetary moons. INTRODUCTION The Acceleration, Reconnection, Turbulence and Electrodynamics of the Moons Interaction with the Sun (ARTEMIS) mission is currently operating two spacecraft in lunar orbit under funding from the Heliophysics and Planetary Science Divisions with NASA’s Science Missions Directorate. ARTEMIS is an extension to the successful Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) mission [1] that has relocated two of the THEMIS spacecraft from Earth orbit to the Moon [2, 3, 4]. ARTEMIS plans to conduct a variety of scientific studies at the Moon using the on-board particle and fields instrument package [5, 6]. The final portion of the ARTEMIS transfers involves moving the two ARTEMIS spacecraft, known as P1 and P2, from Lissajous orbits around the Earth-Moon Lagrange Point #1 (EML1) to long-lived, eccentric lunar science orbits with periods of roughly 28 hr.
    [Show full text]
  • Greetings Members and Friends of EAA Chapter 866
    Dunn Airpark approx.. 1 mile west Landing This is Chain of Lakes Park behind Parrish Hospital. Dunn Airpark flyers take note, one of ours used this to land on NO damage done to plane or anything on the ground! Commendable! Greetings Members and Friends of EAA Chapter 866, Les Boatright Happy Early Independence Day!! I hope you all have a Happy, Safe, and Fun-Filled Fourth of July! With all the long hours of daylight, this is a great time of year to do some aviating, just make sure you steer clear of the “Bombs Bursting in Air” and other Independence Day Holiday Hazards. But most of all, don’t forget that we’ll be serving up some Firecracker Hot Flap-Jacks on the morning Saturday July 1st. I hope to see you all there! PANTHER UPDATE As most of you know, since the beginning of the year I’ve been working with two other chapter members, your V.P. Ed Brennan, and also Bob Rychel to build a Panther Light Sport Aircraft. One of the great things about building this airplane is the fact that it gives me something else to write about in the monthly chapter newsletter. That reminds me . You other builders out there who have some amazing projects underway, we’d love to read something about your projects too. Tell us how they’re coming along, and send a few pictures. I know there are at least a dozen active builder projects in our chapter right now with at least 3 that are close to being finished.
    [Show full text]
  • Pointing Analysis and Design Drivers for Low Earth Orbit Satellite Quantum Key Distribution Jeremiah A
    Air Force Institute of Technology AFIT Scholar Theses and Dissertations Student Graduate Works 3-24-2016 Pointing Analysis and Design Drivers for Low Earth Orbit Satellite Quantum Key Distribution Jeremiah A. Specht Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.afit.edu/etd Part of the Information Security Commons, and the Space Vehicles Commons Recommended Citation Specht, Jeremiah A., "Pointing Analysis and Design Drivers for Low Earth Orbit Satellite Quantum Key Distribution" (2016). Theses and Dissertations. 451. https://scholar.afit.edu/etd/451 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Graduate Works at AFIT Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of AFIT Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POINTING ANALYSIS AND DESIGN DRIVERS FOR LOW EARTH ORBIT SATELLITE QUANTUM KEY DISTRIBUTION THESIS Jeremiah A. Specht, 1st Lt, USAF AFIT-ENY-MS-16-M-241 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR UNIVERSITY AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED. The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the United States Government. This material is declared a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. AFIT-ENY-MS-16-M-241 POINTING ANALYSIS AND DESIGN DRIVERS FOR LOW EARTH ORBIT SATELLITE QUANTUM KEY DISTRIBUTION THESIS Presented to the Faculty Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Graduate School of Engineering and Management Air Force Institute of Technology Air University Air Education and Training Command In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Space Systems Jeremiah A.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Marine Navigation 798
    GLOSSARY OF MARINE NAVIGATION 798 The main cause, however, appears to be the winds which prevail from south through west to northwest over 50 percent of the time throughout the year and the transverse flows from the English coast toward the Skaggerak. The current retains the characteristics of a J major nontidal current and flows northeastward along the northwest coast of Denmark at speeds ranging between 1.5 to 2.0 knots 75 to 100 percent of the time. Jacob’s staff. See CROSS-STAFF. jamming, n. Intentional transmission or re-radiation of radio signals in such a way as to interfere with reception of desired signals by the K intended receiver. Janus configuration. A term describing orientations of the beams of acoustic or electromagnetic energy employed with doppler naviga- Kaléma, n. A very heavy surf breaking on the Guinea coast during the tion systems. The Janus configuration normally used with doppler winter, even when there is no wind. sonar speed logs, navigators, and docking aids employs four beams Kalman filtering. A statistical method for estimating the parameters of a of ultrasonic energy, displaced laterally 90° from each other, and dynamic system, using recursive techniques of estimation, mea- each directed obliquely (30° from the vertical) from the ship’s bot- surement, weighting, and correction. Weighting is based on vari- tom, to obtain true ground speed in the fore and aft and athwartship ances of the measurements and of the estimates. The filter acts to directions. These speeds are measured as doppler frequency shifts reduce the variance of the estimate with each measurement cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloud Download
    NASA Technical Memorandum 106110 Comparisons of Selected Laser Beam Power Missions to Conventionally Powered Missions John M. Bozek National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio and Steven R. Oleson, Geoffrey A. Landis, and Mark W. Stavnes Sverdrup Technology, Inc. Lewis Research Center Group Brook Park, Ohio Prepared for the First Annual Wireless Power Transmission Conference sponsored by the Center for Space Power, Texas A&M University San Antonio, Texas, February 23-25, 1993 NASA COMPARISONS OF SELECTED LASER BEAM POWER MISSIONS TO CONVENTIONALLY POWERED MISSIONS John M. Bozek National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio 44135 and Steven R. Oleson, Geoffrey A. Landis, and Mark W. Stavnes Sverdrup Technology, Inc. Lewis Research Center Group Brook Park, Ohio 44142 SUMMARY Earth-based laser sites beaming laser power to space assets have shown benefits over competing power system concepts for specific missions. Missions analyzed in this report that show benefits of laser beam power are low-Earth-orbit (LEO) to geosynchronous-Earth-orbit (GEO) transfer, LEO to low-lunar-orbit (LLO) cargo missions, and lunar-base power. Both laser- and solar-powered orbit transfer vehicles (OTV's) make a "tug" concept viable, which substantially reduces cumulative initial mass to LEO in comparison to chemical propulsion concepts. In addition, electric propulsion OTV's powered by a laser beam have shorter trip times to and from GEO than do competing OTV's powered solely by the Sun. A round-trip savings of 3 months was calculated for the use of a laser OTV tug instead of a solar OTV tug.
    [Show full text]