DOCSLIB.ORG

Cooperativity Between the Orthosteric and Allosteric Ligand Binding Sites of Rorγt

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cooperativity Between the Orthosteric and Allosteric Ligand Binding Sites of Rorγt Cooperativity between the orthosteric and allosteric ligand binding sites of RORγt Rens M. J. M. de Vriesa,b,1, Femke A. Meijera,b,1, Richard G. Dovestona,b,c,d, Iris A. Leijten-van de Gevela,b, and Luc Brunsvelda,b,2 aLaboratory of Chemical Biology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands; bInstitute for Complex Molecular Systems, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands; cLeicester Institute of Structural and Chemical Biology, University of Leicester, LE1 7RH Leicester, United Kingdom; and dSchool of Chemistry, University of Leicester, LE1 7RH Leicester, United Kingdom Edited by Robert J. Fletterick, University of California, San Francisco, CA, and approved December 31, 2020 (received for review October 12, 2020) Cooperative ligand binding is an important phenomenon in bio- endogenous and synthetic small molecules (17) and constitute logical systems where ligand binding influences the binding of attractive drug targets, with 16% of all drugs targeting this pro- another ligand at an alternative site of the protein via an intra- tein class (18). Mechanistical understanding and exploiting of molecular network of interactions. The underlying mechanisms cooperative dual ligand binding in NRs harbors great potential behind cooperative binding remain poorly understood, primarily for drug development. An interesting NR in this context is the due to the lack of structural data of these ternary complexes. retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor γ t (RORγt) that Using time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (TR-FRET) studies, we show that cooperative ligand binding occurs plays an essential role in the differentiation of T helper 17 for RORγt, a nuclear receptor associated with the pathogenesis of (Th17) cells, associated with the pathogenesis of autoimmune – γ autoimmune diseases. To provide the crucial structural insights, diseases (19 21). Inhibition of ROR t with small molecules, in we solved 12 crystal structures of RORγt simultaneously bound order to disrupt the Th17/IL-17 pathway, is a promising strategy to various orthosteric and allosteric ligands. The presence of the toward reducing the inflammatory response (20, 22–30). The orthosteric ligand induces a clamping motion of the allosteric RORγt ligand binding domain (LBD) has been shown to contain pocket via helices 4 to 5. Additional molecular dynamics simula- both a clearly defined canonical, orthosteric binding site tions revealed the unusual mechanism behind this clamping mo- (Fig. 1 A and B), accessible for both endogenous and synthetic CHEMISTRY tion, with Ala355 shifting between helix 4 and 5. The orthosteric compounds (24, 31–33), and a high-affinity second binding site, γ ROR t agonists regulate the conformation of Ala355, thereby sta- termed allosteric pocket, formed by helices 3, 4, and 11 and bilizing the conformation of the allosteric pocket and coopera- reoriented helix 12 (H12), to which allosteric inverse agonists tively enhancing the affinity of the allosteric inverse agonists. can bind (Fig. 1C) (34–41). The crystal structures of the RORγt nuclear receptors | RORγt | allosteric modulators | structure elucidation | LBD bound to either an orthosteric or allosteric modulator drug discovery Significance BIOCHEMISTRY llosteric ligands bind to pockets on proteins that typically do Anot overlap with the canonical, orthosteric binding pockets RORγt is a nuclear receptor associated with several diseases. that are usually targeted by endogenous ligands (1, 2). Thus, Various synthetic ligands have been developed that target the allosteric ligands exert their effects via different structural modes canonical orthosteric or a second, allosteric pocket of RORγt. of action (1–3). This can convey advantages over orthosteric li- We show that orthosteric and allosteric ligands can simulta- γ gands in terms of potency, because competition with endogenous neously bind to ROR t and that their potency is positively ligands is removed, and selectivity, because allosteric sites are influenced by the other ligand, a phenomenon called cooper- less conserved across protein families (1). Molecules that ative dual ligand binding. The mechanism behind cooperative target allosteric pockets are therefore of high interest for drug binding in proteins is poorly understood, primarily due to the lack of structural data. We solved 12 crystal structures of development. Such ligands have been identified for several im- γ portant protein classes, like G protein coupled receptors ROR t, simultaneously bound to various orthosteric and allo- steric ligands. In combination with molecular dynamics, we (GPCRs) and kinases (4–6), with some of those compounds reveal a mechanism responsible for the cooperative binding developed into marketed drugs (7, 8). behavior. Our comprehensive structural studies provide unique Simultaneous binding of an endogenous, orthosteric ligand insights into how cooperative binding occurs in proteins. and an allosteric drug at different binding sites (dual ligand binding) is a fascinating pharmacological concept since this can Author contributions: R.M.J.M.d.V., F.A.M., and L.B. designed research; R.M.J.M.d.V., modulate the overall physiological effect of the drug. Of par- F.A.M., and I.A.L.-v.d.G. performed research; R.G.D. contributed new reagents/analytic ticular significance are cooperative dual ligand binding events tools; R.M.J.M.d.V., F.A.M., R.G.D., and L.B. analyzed data; and R.M.J.M.d.V., F.A.M., where binding of one ligand enhances that of the other (9–11), as R.G.D., and L.B. wrote the paper. observed for GPCR ligands in particular (12, 13). However, Competing interest statement: L.B. is scientific cofounder of Ambagon Therapeutics, a 14- 3-3 drug discovery company. F.A.M., R.G.D., and L.B. are coinventors of patent detailed structural insights into the mechanics of cooperative WO2020149740: Substituted heterocyclic compounds and their use as retinoid-related ligand binding remain scarce (14). This, in part, results from the orphan receptor (ROR) gamma-t inhibitors. absence of high-resolution structural data, required to visualize This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. the effects of dual ligand binding. Better structural understand- This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ing of cooperativity in dual ligand binding is therefore required NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND). to accelerate the development of new allosteric drugs. 1R.M.J.M.d.V. and F.A.M. contributed equally to this work. Dual ligand binding has occasionally been observed for nu- 2To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: [email protected]. clear receptors (NRs), but there is no clear mechanistic under- This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/ standing of connected cooperative effects (15, 16). NRs are a doi:10.1073/pnas.2021287118/-/DCSupplemental. class of transcription factors that can be modulated by Published February 3, 2021. PNAS 2021 Vol. 118 No. 6 e2021287118 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2021287118 | 1of9 Downloaded by guest on October 2, 2021 Fig. 1. (A) Conceptual representation of the RORγt LBD which is intrinsically active in the apo state, inducing cofactor binding. In the presence of an orthosteric agonist (blue), cofactor binding is further increased, while in the presence of an allosteric inverse agonist (pink), cofactor binding is blocked. In the presence of both an orthosteric and an allosteric ligand, the cofactor blockage is most efficient because of cooperative dual ligand binding. (B) Crystal structure of the RORγt LBD with the agonist 25-OH bound to the orthosteric site (blue sticks; PDB entry 3L0L). (C) Crystal structure of the RORγt LBD with inverse agonist MRL-871 bound to the allosteric site (red sticks; PDB entry 5C4O). The structures show that the orthosteric and allosteric binding sites do not overlap and highlight the prominently different orientation of H12. (D) Chemical structures of RORγt orthosteric agonists (20-OH, 25-OH, CHL, and DSM), orthosteric inverse agonist (digoxin), and allosteric inverse agonists (MRL-871, FM26, and compound 13) used in this study. indicate the possibility for dual ligand binding in this NR (39, 40, 43) are all allosteric inverse agonists, with varying po- (Fig. 1 B and C) (38, 40). tencies, that reposition H12 into a distinct conformation that Here we reveal the biochemical and structural proof of RORγt prevents coactivator binding (Fig. 1 A and C) (35). dual ligand binding in a variety of orthosteric and allosteric li- gand combinations. Our study also provides a detailed mecha- Dual Ligand Binding Enhances the Stability of the RORγt LBD. Ligand nistic explanation of cooperativity between the two binding sites binding typically improves the thermal stability of NRs via in this NR. Extensive dual ligand binding studies combined with structural and dynamic changes to the protein fold (44, 45). dual ligand protein cocrystallography and molecular dynamics Thermal RORγt protein denaturation assays were performed to (MD) simulations highlight the cooperative binding events and investigate the effect of single and dual ligand binding, as indi- shed light on the underlying molecular mechanism controlling cated by the RORγt melting temperature, Tm (45, 46). In the protein conformation and enhanced dual ligand affinity (Fig. 1A). presence of the 20-OH, the Tm of RORγt increased by 3.6 °C, relative to the DMSO control,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From Inverse Agonism to 'Paradoxical Pharmacology' Richard A
    International Congress Series 1249 (2003) 27-37 From inverse agonism to 'Paradoxical Pharmacology' Richard A. Bond*, Kenda L.J. Evans, Zsirzsanna Callaerts-Vegh Department of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Houston, 521 Science and Research Bldg 2, 4800 Caltioun, Houston, TX 77204-5037, USA Received 16 April 2003; accepted 16 April 2003 Abstract The constitutive or spontaneous activity of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and compounds acting as inverse agonists is a recent but well-established phenomenon. Dozens of receptor subtypes for numerous neurotransmitters and hormones have been shown to posses this property. However, do to the apparently low percentage of receptors in the spontaneously active state, the physiologic relevance of these findings remains questionable. The possibility that the reciprocal nature of the effects of agonists and inverse agonists may extend to cellular signaling is discussed, and that this may account for the beneficial effects of certain p-adrenoceptor inverse agonists in the treatment of heart failure. © 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords. Inverse agonism; GPCR; Paradoxical pharmacology 1. Brief history of inverse agonism at G protein-coupled receptors For approximately three-quarters of a century, ligands that interacted with G protein- coupled receptors (GPCRs) were classified either as agonists or antagonists. Receptors were thought to exist in a single quiescent state that could only induce cellular signaling upon agonist binding to the receptor to produce an activated state of the receptor. In this model, antagonists had no cellular signaling ability on their own, but did bind to the receptor and prevented agonists from being able to bind and activate the receptor.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Sense of Pharmacology: Inverse Agonism and Functional Selectivity Kelly A
    International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (2018) 21(10): 962–977 doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyy071 Advance Access Publication: August 6, 2018 Review review Making Sense of Pharmacology: Inverse Agonism and Functional Selectivity Kelly A. Berg and William P. Clarke Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, Texas. Correspondence: William P. Clarke, PhD, Department of Pharmacology, Mail Stop 7764, UT Health at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229 ([email protected]). Abstract Constitutive receptor activity/inverse agonism and functional selectivity/biased agonism are 2 concepts in contemporary pharmacology that have major implications for the use of drugs in medicine and research as well as for the processes of new drug development. Traditional receptor theory postulated that receptors in a population are quiescent unless activated by a ligand. Within this framework ligands could act as agonists with various degrees of intrinsic efficacy, or as antagonists with zero intrinsic efficacy. We now know that receptors can be active without an activating ligand and thus display “constitutive” activity. As a result, a new class of ligand was discovered that can reduce the constitutive activity of a receptor. These ligands produce the opposite effect of an agonist and are called inverse agonists. The second topic discussed is functional selectivity, also commonly referred to as biased agonism. Traditional receptor theory also posited that intrinsic efficacy is a single drug property independent of the system in which the drug acts. However, we now know that a drug, acting at a single receptor subtype, can have multiple intrinsic efficacies that differ depending on which of the multiple responses coupled to a receptor is measured.
    [Show full text]
  • Cannabinoid-1 Receptor Inverse Agonists: Current Understanding of Mechanism of Action and Unanswered Questions
    International Journal of Obesity (2009) 33, 947–955 & 2009 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0307-0565/09 $32.00 www.nature.com/ijo REVIEW Cannabinoid-1 receptor inverse agonists: current understanding of mechanism of action and unanswered questions TM Fong1 and SB Heymsfield2 1Merck Research Laboratories, Department of Metabolic Disorders, Rahway, NJ, USA and 2Merck Research Laboratories, Global Center of Scientific Affairs, Rahway, NJ, USA Rimonabant and taranabant are two extensively studied cannabinoid-1 receptor (CB1R) inverse agonists. Their effects on in vivo peripheral tissue metabolism are generally well replicated. The central nervous system site of action of taranabant or rimonabant is firmly established based on brain receptor occupancy studies. At the whole-body level, the mechanism of action of CB1R inverse agonists includes a reduction in food intake and an increase in energy expenditure. At the tissue level, fat mass reduction, liver lipid reduction and improved insulin sensitivity have been shown. These effects on tissue metabolism are readily explained by CB1R inverse agonist acting on brain CB1R and indirectly influencing the tissue metabolism through the autonomic nervous system. It has also been hypothesized that rimonabant acts directly on adipocytes, hepatocytes, pancreatic islets or skeletal muscle in addition to acting on brain CB1R, although strong support for the contribution of peripherally located CB1R to in vivo efficacy is still lacking. This review will carefully examine the published literature
    [Show full text]
  • Different Inverse Agonist Activities of P»-Adrenergic Receptor Antagonists—Pharmacological Characterization and Therapeutical
    International Congress Series 1249 (2003) 39-53 Different inverse agonist activities of p»-adrenergic receptor antagonists—pharmacological characterization and therapeutical implications in the treatment of chronic heart failure Christoph Maack*, Michael Bòhm Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik fiir Innere Medizin III, Universitat des Saarlandes, 66421 Homburg/Saai; Germany Received 16 April 2003; accepted 16 April 2003 Abstract The treatment of chronic heart failure with most p-adrenergic receptor (p-AR) antagonists leads to an improvement of symptoms and left ventricular function. However, only metoprolol, bisoprolol and carvedilol have been shown to reduce mortality in these patients. Bucindolol did not reduce mortality and xamoterol even increased it. These differences may be related to different inverse agonist or partial agonist activity of p-AR antagonists. This review focusses on the determination of different intrinsic activity of the mentioned p-AR antagonists in the human myocardium. Furthermore, the clinical impact of these differences is examined. In this regard, the effect of the different p-AR antagonists on p-AR regulation, minimum heart rate and exercise tolerance, as well as prognosis, is highlighted. It is concluded that the degree of inverse agonism of a p-AR antagonist determines the degree of p-AR resensitization, reduction of minimum heart rate, improvement of exercise tolerance and possibly also improvement of prognosis of patients with chronic heart failure. © 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Key\vords: Inverse agonism; p-adrenergic receptors; p-blockers, Heart faitee * Corresponding author. Current address: The Johns Hopkins University, Institute of Molecular Cardio- biology, Division of Cardiology, 720 Rutland Ave., 844 Ross Bldg., Baltimore, MD 21205-2195, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Equilibrium Assays Are Required to Accurately Characterize the Activity Profiles of Drugs
    Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward. Published on June 28, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/mol.118.112573 This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. MOL112573 Equilibrium Assays are Required to Accurately Characterize the Activity Profiles of Drugs Modulating Gq-Coupled GPCRs Sara Bdioui, Julien Verdi, Nicolas Pierre, Eric Trinque, Thomas Roux, Terry Kenakin SB, JV, NP, ET, TR: Cisbio Bioassays, 30200 Codolet, France TK : Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina Downloaded from molpharm.aspetjournals.org at ASPET Journals on September 26, 2021 1 Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward. Published on June 28, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/mol.118.112573 This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. MOL112573 RUNNING (SHORT) TITLE Functional assays for Gq Protein activating Receptor Ligands Corresponding author: Terry Kenakin Ph.D. Professor, Department of Pharmacology University of North Carolina School of Medicine Downloaded from 120 Mason Farm Road Room 4042 Genetic Medicine Building, CB# 7365 molpharm.aspetjournals.org Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7365 Phone: 919-962-7863 Fax: 919-966-7242 or 5640 Email: [email protected] at ASPET Journals on September 26, 2021 Number of text pages: 56 Number of tables: 0 Number of figures: 13 Number of references: 33 Number of words in the Abstract: 233 Number of words in the Introduction: 599 Number of words in the Discussion: 1497 2 Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward. Published on June 28, 2018 as DOI: 10.1124/mol.118.112573 This article has not been copyedited and formatted.
    [Show full text]
  • Immunomodulatory Potential of Cannabidiol in Multiple Sclerosis: a Systematic Review
    Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology https://doi.org/10.1007/s11481-021-09982-7 INVITED REVIEW Immunomodulatory Potential of Cannabidiol in Multiple Sclerosis: a Systematic Review Alessia Furgiuele1 & Marco Cosentino1 & Marco Ferrari1 & Franca Marino1 Received: 16 December 2020 /Accepted: 6 January 2021 # The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common chronic autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. Efficacy of treatments for MS is associated with risk of adverse effects, and effective and well-tolerated drugs remain a major unmet need. Cannabis (Cannabis sativa L., fam. Cannabaceae) and cannabinoids are popular among MS patients to treat spasticity and pain. Cannabinoids are endowed with remarkable immunomodulating properties, and in particular the non-psychotropic cannabinoid cannabidiol (CBD) is increasingly recognized as anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive, nevertheless with excellent toler- ability even at high doses. In this systematic review, we retrieved and critically evaluated available evidence regarding the immune and disease-modifying effects of CBD in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and in MS. Evidence in rodent models of EAE strongly supports CBD as effective, while clinical evidence is still limited and usually negative, due to paucity of studies and possibly to the use of suboptimal dosing regimens. Better characterization of targets acted upon by CBD in MS should be obtained in ex vivo/in vitro studies in human immune cells, and higher doses should be tested in well-designed clinical trials with clinically relevant efficacy endpoints. Keywords Multiple sclerosis . Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis . Cannabidiol . Immunomodulation Introduction (PRMS), occurring in fewer than 5% of patients (Dobson and Giovannoni 2019; Reich et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 5-HT2A Receptors in the Central Nervous System the Receptors
    The Receptors Bruno P. Guiard Giuseppe Di Giovanni Editors 5-HT2A Receptors in the Central Nervous System The Receptors Volume 32 Series Editor Giuseppe Di Giovanni Department of Physiology & Biochemistry Faculty of Medicine and Surgery University of Malta Msida, Malta The Receptors book Series, founded in the 1980’s, is a broad-based and well- respected series on all aspects of receptor neurophysiology. The series presents published volumes that comprehensively review neural receptors for a specific hormone or neurotransmitter by invited leading specialists. Particular attention is paid to in-depth studies of receptors’ role in health and neuropathological processes. Recent volumes in the series cover chemical, physical, modeling, biological, pharmacological, anatomical aspects and drug discovery regarding different receptors. All books in this series have, with a rigorous editing, a strong reference value and provide essential up-to-date resources for neuroscience researchers, lecturers, students and pharmaceutical research. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/7668 Bruno P. Guiard • Giuseppe Di Giovanni Editors 5-HT2A Receptors in the Central Nervous System Editors Bruno P. Guiard Giuseppe Di Giovanni Faculté de Pharmacie Department of Physiology Université Paris Sud and Biochemistry Université Paris-Saclay University of Malta Chatenay-Malabry, France Msida MSD, Malta Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale (CRCA) Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI) Université de Toulouse; CNRS, UPS Toulouse, France The Receptors ISBN 978-3-319-70472-2 ISBN 978-3-319-70474-6 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70474-6 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017964095 © Springer International Publishing AG 2018 This work is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Antihistaminergics and Inverse Agonism. Potential Therapeutic Applications, European Journal of Pharmacology, 10.1016/J.Ej- Phar.2013.06.027
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CONICET Digital Author's Accepted Manuscript Antihistaminergics and inverse agonism. Po- tential therapeutic applications Federico Monczor, Natalia Fernandez, Carlos P. Fitzsimons, Carina Shayo, Carlos Davio www.elsevier.com/locate/ejphar PII: S0014-2999(13)00496-2 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.06.027 Reference: EJP68687 To appear in: European Journal of Pharmacology Received date: 27 February 2013 Revised date: 7 June 2013 Accepted date: 21 June 2013 Cite this article as: Federico Monczor, Natalia Fernandez, Carlos P. Fitzsimons, Carina Shayo, Carlos Davio, Antihistaminergics and inverse agonism. Potential therapeutic applications, European Journal of Pharmacology, 10.1016/j.ej- phar.2013.06.027 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting galley proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. Antihistaminergics and inverse agonism. Potential therapeutic applications. Federico Monczor1,4, Natalia Fernandez1,4, Carlos P. Fitzsimons2, Carina Shayo3,4 and Carlos Davio1,4. From Laboratorio de Farmacología de Receptores, Cátedra de Química Medicinal, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires 1, Center for Neuroscience, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2, Laboratorio de Farmacología y Patología Molecular, Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental 3; and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina 4 Running head: G-protein sequestering by GPCR inverse agonists.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeting Cannabinoid Receptors: Current Status and Prospects of Natural Products
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Targeting Cannabinoid Receptors: Current Status and Prospects of Natural Products Dongchen An, Steve Peigneur , Louise Antonia Hendrickx and Jan Tytgat * Toxicology and Pharmacology, KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, O&N 2, Herestraat 49, P.O. Box 922, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; [email protected] (D.A.); [email protected] (S.P.); [email protected] (L.A.H.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 12 June 2020; Accepted: 15 July 2020; Published: 17 July 2020 Abstract: Cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2), as part of the endocannabinoid system, play a critical role in numerous human physiological and pathological conditions. Thus, considerable efforts have been made to develop ligands for CB1 and CB2, resulting in hundreds of phyto- and synthetic cannabinoids which have shown varying affinities relevant for the treatment of various diseases. However, only a few of these ligands are clinically used. Recently, more detailed structural information for cannabinoid receptors was revealed thanks to the powerfulness of cryo-electron microscopy, which now can accelerate structure-based drug discovery. At the same time, novel peptide-type cannabinoids from animal sources have arrived at the scene, with their potential in vivo therapeutic effects in relation to cannabinoid receptors. From a natural products perspective, it is expected that more novel cannabinoids will be discovered and forecasted as promising drug leads from diverse natural sources and species, such as animal venoms which constitute a true pharmacopeia of toxins modulating diverse targets, including voltage- and ligand-gated ion channels, G protein-coupled receptors such as CB1 and CB2, with astonishing affinity and selectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Essential Lexicon of Pharmacology
    1 ESSENTIAL LEXICON OF PHARMACOLOGY Francesco Clementi and Guido Fumagalli using tools and methods of these disciplines to test drugs or By reading this chapter, you will: vice versa employing drugs to investigate cellular and molec- ular processes, and a clinician using drugs to cure patients. • Become familiar with the pharmacological vocabulary THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF PHARMACOLOGY Pharmacology studies drugs and their interactions with Using drugs to treat diseases and conditions has changed living organisms. In a broad sense, a drug is any substance the life of humanity (see Chapter 2). Several factors have that induces functional changes in an organism through contributed to the remarkable improvements in population a chemical or physical action, regardless of whether the health that have occurred over the last century in developed resulting effect is beneficial or detrimental to the health of countries: improved hygienic conditions, more widespread the receiving organism. In a more strict medical sense, a culture of prevention and health, richer and more balanced drug is a substance used in the diagnosis, treatment, or pre- diet, and less physically wearing working conditions. However, vention of diseases or as a component of a medication. such effects on life quality and duration would not have been Thus, the fields of interest in pharmacology are multiple, so significant without the development of drugs and evidence‐ including chemistry, molecular and cellular biology, based approaches to human health care. pathology, clinic, and toxicology. Studying a drug may mean Drugs have contributed to the disappearance of many investigating the chemical properties underlying its biological serious diseases. As an example, consider the number of daily activity, or the way to synthesize or extract it, or its effects on deaths from bacterial pneumonia during winter months in cells, tissues, and organs or on healthy and diseased human general hospitals before World War II as compared to the subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Synapse
    NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Synapse. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 April 1. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptPublished NIH-PA Author Manuscript in final edited NIH-PA Author Manuscript form as: Synapse. 2010 April ; 64(4): 280±288. doi:10.1002/syn.20723. Identification of a Novel “Almost Neutral” Mu Opioid Receptor Antagonist in CHO Cells Expressing the Cloned Human Mu Opioid Receptor Elliott J. Sally1, Heng Xu1, Christina M. Dersch1, Ling-Wei Hsin3, Li-Te Chang3, Thomas E. Prisinzano4, Denise S. Simpson4, Denise Giuvelis5, Kenner C. Rice2, Arthur E. Jacobson2, Kejun Cheng2, Edward J. Bilsky5, and Richard B. Rothman1 1Clinical Psychopharmacology Section, IRP, NIDA, NIH, DHHS, Baltimore 2Drug Design and Synthesis Section, IRP, NIDA, NIH, DHHS, Baltimore, MD 3National Taiwan University, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences 4Department of Medicinal Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045 5University of New England, Biddeford, ME, (DG, EJB) Abstract The basal (constitutive) activity of G protein-coupled receptors allows for the measurement of inverse agonist activity. Some competitive antagonists turn into inverse agonists under conditions where receptors are constitutively active. In contrast, neutral antagonists have no inverse agonist activity, and they block both agonist and inverse agonist activity. The mu opioid receptor (MOR) demonstrates detectable constitutive activity only after a state of dependence is produced by chronic treatment with a MOR agonist. We therefore sought to identify novel MOR inverse agonists, and novel neutral MOR antagonists in both untreated and agonist-treated MOR cells. CHO cells expressing the cloned human mu receptor (hMOR-CHO cells) were incubated for 20 hr with medium (control) or 10 μM (2S,4aR,6aR,7R,9S,10aS,10bR)-9-(benzoyloxy)-2-(3- furanyl)dodecahydro-6a,10b-dimethyl-4,10-dioxo-2H-naphtho-[2,1-c]pyran-7-carboxylic acid methyl ester (herkinorin, HERK).
    [Show full text]
  • Essential Psychopharmacology
    CONTENTS Preface vii Chapter 1 Principles of Chemical Neurotransmission 1 Chapter 2 Receptors and Enzymes as the Targets of Drug Action 35 Chapter 3 Special Properties of Receptors 77 Chapter 4 Chemical Neurotransmission as the Mediator of Disease Actions 99 Chapter 5 Depression and Bipolar Disorders 135 Chapter 6 Classical Antidepressants, Serotonin Selective Reuptake Inhibitors, and. Noradrenergic Reuptake Inhibitors 199 Chapter 7 Newer Antidepressants and Mood Stabilizers 245 Chapter 8 Anxiolytics and Sedative-Hypnotics 297 Chapter 9 Drug Treatments for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Panic Disorder, and Phobic Disorders 335 xi xii Contens Chapter 10 Psychosis and Schizophrenia 365 Chapter 11 Antipsychotic Agents 401 Chapter 12 Cognitive Enhancers 459 Chapter 13 Psychopharmacology of Reward and Drugs of Abuse 499 Chapter 14 Sex-Specific and Sexual Function-Related Psychopharmacology 539 Suggested Reading 569 Index 575 CME Post Tests and Evaluations CHAPTER 3 SPECIAL PROPERTIES OF RECEPTORS I. Multiple receptor subtypes A. Definition and description B. Pharmacological subtyping C. Receptor superfamilies II. Agonists and antagonists A. Antagonists B. Inverse agonists C. Partial agonists D. Light and dark as an analogy for partial agonists III. Allosteric modulation A. Positive allosteric interactions B. Negative allosteric interactions IV. Co-transmission versus allosteric modulation V. Summary The study of receptor psychopharmacology involves understanding not only that receptors are the targets for most of the known drugs but also that they have some very special properties. This chapter will build on the discussion of the general properties of receptors introduced in Chapter 2 and will introduce the reader to some of the special properties of receptors that help explain how they participate in key drug interactions.
    [Show full text]