2014 Access Triennial Findings

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2014 Access Triennial Findings 2014 Access Triennial Findings December 16, 2014 What is a Triennial Review? • Triennial review of federal grantees • Access participates annually • Ensure grantees and contractors are compliant with federal laws and rules • Conducted by consultants selected by FTA • Much more rigorous/detailed Regional ADA Findings • Three regional ADA findings • No Shows (2014) • Origin to Destination (2013, 2014) • Fares (2014) • All of these policies have been reviewed previously and have been found compliant in the past. Proposed No Show Policy Revisions December 16, 2014 Background • 2014 Triennial Review No-Show Policy Findings • Frequency of Travel • Length of Suspension • Subscription (Standing Order) Trips Current No-Show Policy • 6 no-shows in 60 days • 4 Tier Suspension Policy • 10 days • 30 days • 60 days • 90 days • Standing Order Trips must be cancelled by 10pm the day before. Proposed No-Show Policy • 5 or more no-shows in a calendar month and exceed10% of total monthly trips • Two (2) Tier Suspension • 15 days • 30 days • Standing Order trips must be cancelled two (2) hours before scheduled Comparability Finding Current Policy Proposed Policy 1) 5 or more no-shows in Frequency of Travel 6 no-shows in a calendar month 60 days 2) Exceed 10% of total monthly trips Length of Suspension 4 Tier Suspension 2 Tier Suspension (10, 30, 60, 90 days) (15, 30 days) Subscription Trips Cancel 10 pm Cancel 2 hours (late cancellation) day before before scheduled Next Steps • Send to FTA for concurrence • Bring to Access Board of Directors for approval • Implement by March 1st, 2015 Questions? Comments? Origin to Destination Finding December 16, 2014 Origin to Destination • Access must provide “Origin to Destination” service • Based on 2005 DOT “guidance” • Metro backed Access’ position until May of this year • If the region funds the added cost, Access is prepared to comply by July 1st Implementation plan Create an Ad Hoc Regional Paratransit Working Group comprised of riders, transportation service providers, member agencies, interested stakeholders, and Access staff. Direct the ad hoc group to develop policies and procedures on how origin to destination will be implemented throughout Los Angeles County. The results shall be presented to the Access Services Board of Directors for concurrence. Implementation Plan Once the policies and procedures have been approved, Access will retain HDR Engineering, Inc. to develop cost projections. The cost projections will be presented to the Access Board of Directors for approval. Submit a request for funding to Metro. Implementation Plan Conduct a thorough public participation process as required by the ADA regulations. Present an amendment to the Los Angeles County Coordinated Paratransit Plan to the membership of Access Services. If approved, submit to the Federal Transit Administration and begin the process of implementing origin to destination service. Next steps Bring milestones to the Access Board in January for implementing Origin to Destination Communicate milestones to FTA Implement by July 1st Questions? Comments? Los Angeles County Fare Policies December 16, 2014 Current Fare Policies • Access has had a coordinated fare for the last 20 years • Benefits: • Simple to administer • Easy for customers to understand National Fare Comparison Fare Policy (Current methodology) • 2005 Triennial Findings led to current methodology • Sample of 1,200 trips to determine regional transit fare • Methodology communicated to FTA Office of Civil Rights in 2006 • 2005 Findings were removed Fare Policy (2014 Findings) • No additional findings until 2014 • Finding that Access fare is more than twice the fixed-route base fare for some member agencies • Torrance Transit, Santa Monica’s Big Blue Bus, Culver City Bus, Foothill Transit and Metro received findings Road to compliance • Three Options • Regional fixed-route minimum fare • Dynamic fare • Regulatory change Fare Policy Options (Member Agency Fares) Require all member agencies to have a minimum base fare or adopt a unified fare structure in order to set a compliant regional fare for ADA paratransit service. Compliant Member Agency Base Fares Member Agency Base Fare Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority $2.50 City of Westlake Village $2.00 City of Bell $1.75 City of Cudahy $1.75 City of Huntington Park $1.75 City of Inglewood $1.75 City of Lynwood $1.75 City of Rosemead $1.75 Los Angeles County Department of Public Works $1.75 Metro $1.75 Antelope Valley Transit Authority $1.50 LADOT $1.50 Noncompliant Member Agency Base Fares Member Agency Base Fare Member Agency Base Fare Foothill Transit $1.25 Baldwin Park Transit $0.80 Long Beach Transit $1.25 City of Lawndale $0.75 Norwalk $1.25 Pasadena Area Rapid Transit $0.75 Montebello Municipal Bus Lines $1.10 Bellflower Bus $0.50 Beach Cities Transit $1.00 City of Bell Gardens $0.50 BurbankBus $1.00 City of Cerritos $0.50 Carson Circuit $1.00 City of El Monte $0.50 City of Calabasas $1.00 Downey Link $0.50 City of Paramount $1.00 Alhambra Community Transit $0.25 City of West Covina $1.00 City of Compton $0.25 Culver CityBus $1.00 City of Monterey Park $0.25 Gardena Transit $1.00 City of Commerce Municipal Bus $0.00 Glendale Beeline $1.00 City of La Cañada Flintridge $0.00 Santa Clarita Transit $1.00 City of Sierra Madre $0.00 Santa Monica Big Blue Bus $1.00 City of West Hollywood $0.00 Torrance Transit $1.00 Duarte Transit $0.00 Fare Policy Options (Dynamic Fare) Move to a dynamic fare system in which fares for each trip will be calculated using the trip planner on www.metro.net or www.go511.com. The Access fare may be double the lowest fare quoted. Trips that cannot be provided by fixed route services may be denied. Fare Policy Options (Dynamic Fare) • Impact of a dynamic fare system • Strict compliance with current regulations • Higher fares (assuming 2X) 19.9 Miles 20 + Miles Total Lower Cost 129 12% 3 2% 132 Higher Cost 928 88% 140 98% 1,068 1,057 143 1,200 Fare Policy Options (Dynamic Fare) • Varying fares • Regional trip denial? • Coupon issues • Technical issues • Software changes will take a minimum of 9 months • Fare rules • Which trip should be chosen? Fare Policy Options (Dynamic Fare) Metro.net found 12 trips leaving from EL MONTE to WESTWOOD (UCLA) at 8 am. Lines Depart Duration Fare Transfer Foothill Transit 481/Metro Rapid Line 720 810 1:25 $3.25 $0.50 Metro Silver Line/Metro Rapid Line 720 800 1:40 $2.50 TAP ‐ Free Foothill Transit Silver Streak/Metro Rapid Line 720 809 1:35 $2.95 $0.50 Foothill Transit 481/Metro Local Line 20 810 1:50 $3.25 $0.50 Metro Silver Line/Metro Local Line 20 800 1:49 $2.50 TAP ‐ Free Foothill Transit Silver Streak/Metro Local Line 2 809 1:54 $2.95 $0.50 Metro Silver Line/Metro Local Line 2 800 1:55 $2.50 TAP ‐ Free Foothill Transit Silver Streak/Metro Local Line 20 809 2:04 $2.95 $0.50 Metro Silver Line/Metro Local Line 4 800 2:12 $2.50 TAP ‐ Free Metro Rapid Line 770/Metro Rapid Line 720 802 2:10 $1.75 TAP ‐ Free Foothill Transit Silver Streak/Metro Local Line 4 809 2:03 $2.95 $0.50 Fare Policy Options (Regulatory Change) Given that the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) regulations encourage a coordinated paratransit plan but do not address a coordinated paratransit fare, seek legislative or regulatory changes to allow for a coordinated fare when operating under a coordinated plan. Fare Policy Options (Regulatory Change) • ADA regulations encourage coordinated systems but are “silent” on coordinated fares • Legislative/regulatory change would solve the problem and allow Access to keep the fare system it has had for the last twenty years FTA Meeting • Met with Acting Administrator Therese McMillan on December 2nd • FTA believes that a dynamic fare system is feasible • Will give region time to implement • DOT rulemaking petition also a possibility Next steps • Bring milestones to the Access Board in January • Dynamic fare implementation schedule • Investigate rulemaking petition • Communicate milestones to the FTA .
Recommended publications
  • The Value of Bus Rapid Transit: Hedonic Price Analysis of The
    The Value of Bus Rapid Transit: Hedonic Price Analysis of the EmX in Eugene, Oregon Peter Hodel & Megen Ickler Presented to the Department of Economics, University of Oregon, as partial fulfillment of requirements for honors in Economics. Under the supervision of Professor Joe Stone Abstract Transportation investments can increase the welfare of a city or region in order to create economic development. Often public transportation has the potential for economic development in three ways; sustaining and maintaining dense development and growth in the downtown core; allocating land use and development; creating and stimulating economic growth and employment opportunities. These are measured along the transit line through increase in property values, increased development projects, and changes in business activity (Neuwirth, 143). Other contributing factors to transit decisions include objectives and values, effects on various groups, downtown development and environmental quality. Different modes accomplish these goals with various efficiencies depending on their characteristics. This paper will introduce an examination of the bus rapid transit (BRT) line in the Eugene area based on changes in residential property values. Specifically, the purpose is to determine benefits in terms of the property values changes before and after the implementation of the line. We considered residential sale prices from 2002- 2012 and analyzed trends of house values across varying distances. We found a significant, negative correlation between distance from a property and the Franklin EmX line. There was no significant trend to draw from in regards to the Gateway extension but this value may have simply not had enough time to capitalize into the surrounding properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of the Silver Streak “BRT- Like” Service
    Evolution of the Silver Streak “BRT- Like” Service BRT Conference June 18, 2018 FOOTHILL TRANSIT FACTS • 327 Square Miles • 359 Buses In Fleet • San Gabriel Valley • 329 CNG Buses • Pomona Valley • 30 All Electric Proterra Buses • 37 Lines SLOW POPULATION GROWTH FOOTHILL TRANSIT FACTS • Began Service in December of 1988 • Formed to provide improved service • Increase local control of regional transit • UniqueSLOW Public/Private POPULATION Partnership GROWTH • Public: Joint Powers Authority • 22 member-cities • Los Angeles County • Administration Foothill Transit Employees • Private: Contracted Operations • Pomona Operation Facility – Keolis • Irwindale/ Arcadia Operations Facility – TransDev • Call Center/ Transit Stores/ Bus Stop Technicians- TransDev JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY 22 Cities and the County of Los Angeles Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3 • Claremont • Azusa • Arcadia • La VerneSLOW POPULATION• Baldwin GROWTH Park • Bradbury • Pomona • Covina • Duarte • San Dimas • Glendora • Monrovia • Walnut • Irwindale • Pasadena Cluster 4 • West Covina • Temple City • Diamond Bar Cluster 5 • El Monte • First District, County of L.A. • Industry • Fourth District, County of L.A. • La Puente • Fifth District, County of L.A. • South El Monte What is the Silver Streak • A high-speed bus system which operates like a rail line on rubber tires • Incorporates high-tech vehicles, uniform fare structure, stations not stops, and frequent service Vehicles • 60-foot articulated buses • 58-passenger seating capacity • SmartBUS equipped • Boarding through three doors Service • Replace current Line 480 • Easy connections to Metro, Metrolink, Omni, and Foothill Transit local routes Service Map • Reduce travel time by 30-40 minutes • Simple, easy to understand route SILVER STREAK BRT FEATURES (2007) • Unique Branding • Dedicated Fleet • WiSLOW-Fi POPULATION GROWTH • All Door Boarding • Exclusive Right of Way • El Monte Busway (El Monte – Union Station) TAP CARD (2009) SLOW POPULATION GROWTH .
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station Area Connections
    metro.net Union Station Area Connections 1 Destinations Lines Stops Scale One Unit: /4 Mile Chinese Historical Lincoln/Cypress Station Society Chinatown Alhambra 76, 78, 79, 378, 485 B CL 5 8 7 BE Heritage and Altadena via Lake 485 7 A 1 Metro Local Stop RN Visitors Center Arcadia 78, 79, 378 B C AR T Metro Local and D S Artesia Transit Center n Metro Silver Line n J 1 S A RapidL Stop Y T G Baldwin Park Metro Silver Line n to 190 N Å K A W I ST I Chung King Chinese R E Beverly Hills Metro Purple Line o to 20, 720; 704 5 Metro Rapid Line UM Bamboo R Los Angeles S N I Cultural P EY T D Road Art Plaza State S W S Bob Hope Airport (BUR) ÅÍ 94, 794, Metrolink Å, Amtrak Í W 2 N A BA T C Center D Galleries HU M N Metro Silver Line Stop S NG B Historical 110 D K o E I O A U Boyle Heights Metro Gold Line , 30, 68, 770 B R N CP T G C O G T L A N T S I N Park N A Mandarin K G 5 7 I N Broadway 30, 40, 42, 730, 740, 745 A O N FIN G L E IN L N N Metro Silver Line G W N B U Y Plaza P R H E Burbank Å 94, 96, 794 W 2 O C I E E Paci>c L L N C Y D T T E Cal Poly Pomona Metro Silver Line n to 190, 194 K Metro Rail StationT A S M E JU L S W Alliance N Y U G J R Y I W F N and Entrance G L n S W W Y Carson Metro Silver Line to 246 J Medical Y N G U R B O N E T M A I R O L N P A N I 5 6 O E T Center U L Y Century City 704, 728, CE534 E 3 O W R E D S D S M L A E E W I T Metro Red LineA C M U S E IN O O W G A N Y U S City Terrace 70, 71 E B C I P L V O F LE L T n N M Covina Å Metro Silver Line to 190 K Metro Purple Line G L IN E A S Crenshaw District 40, 42, 740
    [Show full text]
  • System-Wide Transit Corridor Plan for the San Bernardino Valley
    System-Wide Transit Corridor Plan for the San Bernardino Valley sbX E Street Corridor BRT Project Prepared for: Omnitrans Prepared by: Parsons Patti Post & Associates October 2010 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 5 1.1 SAFETEA-LU ............................................................................................................ 6 1.2 2004 System-Wide Plan ............................................................................................ 7 1.3 Development of the E Street Corridor ....................................................................... 7 1.4 California SB 375 .................................................................................................... 17 1.5 San Bernardino County Long Range Transit Plan ................................................... 18 1.6 Regionally Approved Travel Demand Model ........................................................... 21 1.7 Roles and Responsibilities ...................................................................................... 21 1.8 Opportunities to Shape Development/Redevelopment ............................................ 21 1.8.1 Economic Development ............................................................................. 21 1.8.2 Transit-Oriented Developments ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Rapid Transit and Carbon Offsets FINAL
    Bus Rapid Transit and Carbon Offsets Issues Paper Prepared for: California Climate Action Registry Adam Millard-Ball Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates and IPER, Stanford University November 2008 Table of Contents 1 Introduction and Key Conclusions...........................................................................................................3 2 Bus Rapid Transit ........................................................................................................................................5 2.1 Definition..............................................................................................................................................5 2.2 Number of Future Projects................................................................................................................6 2.3 Project Development Process and Motivations..............................................................................7 2.4 Costs and Funding...............................................................................................................................8 2.5 Emission Reduction Benefits.............................................................................................................9 2.6 Other Environmental Benefits ........................................................................................................13 3 Existing Methodologies ............................................................................................................................14 3.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles County Bus Rapid Transit and Street Design Improvement Study
    Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles County Bus Rapid Transit and Street Design Improvement Study Final Report December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles County Bus Rapid Transit and Street Design Improvement Study Final Report December 2013 Prepared by: PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF In cooperation with: Sam Schwartz Engineering and CHS Consulting Los Angeles County Bus Rapid Transit and Final Report Street Design Improvement Study Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. ES‐1 Introduction and Study Background .......................................................................................................... I‐1 Study Purpose and Need ......................................................................................................................... I‐1 Overall Approach ..................................................................................................................................... I‐2 Initial Screening Stages and Results ......................................................................................................... II‐1 Initial corridor selection (108) ............................................................................................................... II‐1 Refined List of Candidate Corridors (43 Corridors) ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bus and Rail System
    Metro Local & Limited Approximate frequency in minutes Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Line Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve 2 6-10 10-12 18-60b 13-15 20-60b 15-20 25-60b 4 9-12 15 15-30f 12-15 15-30f 15-20 15-30f 10 5-10 20 30-60 18-20 30-60 20 30-60 14 4-8 15 30-60 16-30 30-60 18-25 30-60 16 3-8 8-10 30 6-10 30 8-15 30 18 3-10 10 30-60 10-12 15-60 10-15 15-60 20 6-10 10-12 30f 15-20 30f 20 30f 28 6-12 20 30 9-10 20-30 14-15 30 30 7-10 12-15 20-60 10-13 30-60 10 30-60 33 7-15 15-20 30-60f 15-20 30-60f 20-25 30-60f 35 12 12 30-60 15 15-60 20 30-60 37 4-8 15 30-60 16-30 30-60 18-25 30-60 38 12-24 24 25-60 30 30-60 40 30-60 40 5-10 15-16 18-60 10-22 20-60 12-24 28-60 42 20-25 30-32 60 22-65 60 60-85 60 45 5-8 10-12 25-60 9-15 20-60 12-15 30-60 48 5-10 20 30-60 18-20 30-60 40 30-60 51 4-15 20-24 36-65 7-30 40-60 10-30 40-60 52 17-20 20-24 60 22-32 43-50 20-30 60 metro.net 53 6-10 12-15 30-60 12-15 30-60 17-19 34-60 55 4-15 20 60 15-20 60 20-30 60 60 5-10 15-20 20-60g 10-15 30-60g 10-12 30-60g 62 15-27 30-32 40-60 40-60 60 60 60 66 2-8 12 21-60 5-15 20-60 15 35-60 68 13-17 20 30-60 20 40-60 15-20 40-60 70 10-12 15 25-60 16 25-60 12-13 20-60 71 15-35 35 - 60 - 60 - 76 12-15 16 21-60 15-20 35-60 15-20 30-60 78 10-20 16-40 20-60 15-30 50-60 15-40 60 79 20-30 40-45 60 40-45 60 34-45 60 81 6-10 15 22-60 15 30-60 20 20-60 83 18-25 25 30-60 25 30-60 30 60 Bus and Rail System 84 13-17 20 30-60 20 40-60 15-20 40-60 90 23-30 60 120 60 120 60 120 91 28-40 60 120 60 120 60 120 92 14-24 22-26 60 21-30 60 40 60 94 15-20 30 60 20 30-70 20 50-70 96 24-30 28 - 50-55
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Bus & Metro Rail System
    Metro Bus & Metro Rail System Map Metro Local & Limited Lines to Santa Clarita LA County Metro Liner Service Metro Express Lines Metro Shuttles & Circulators Metro Rapid Lines to Santa Clarita Olive View-UCLA Approximate frequency in minutes and Antelope Valley Medical Center Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Approximate frequency in minutes '&% H>BH=6L Weekdays Saturdays Sundays * 236 Line Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Weekdays Saturdays Sundays CE409 224 234 Line Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve SC8 7A:9HD:290 634 Orange 4-5 10 10-20 11-12 10-20 11-12 10-20 Line Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve El Cariso 2 4-10 9-12 15-30 12-14 15-30 15-25 20-30 Regional 439 30-45 40-60 60b 60b 60 60 60b 603 10-12 12 30 20-30 20-30 20 30 704 8-12 15 18b 12-18 18b 15-25 18b 4 8-15 15-16 15-30 13-20 15-30 15-30 15-30 County Park 442 25 - - - - - - 605 10 15-20 30a 30 30a 30 30a 705 10-20 20 20 - - - - 234 H6NG: 10 7-15 15-30 15-30 12-20 30-60 15-30 30-60 236 7DG9:C GDM;DG9 LA Mission 444 10-30 60 60a 60 60a 60 60a 607 35 - - - - - - 710 8-10 20 20a 20 20a - - SC8 <A:CD6@H 14 12-25 20 20-60 15-20 20-60 15-30 20-60 H6C;:GC6C9DG9224 College 445 30 60 30-60 60 60a 60 60a 608 60 60 - - - - - 711 9-10 20 12-20 15-20 25 20 25 =J776G9 16 2-6 7-8 10-30 6-10 10-30 8-20 12-30 290 446 25-40 60c 60 60c 60 60c 60 611 11-35 40 30-50 30-40 30-50 30-40 30-50 714
    [Show full text]
  • Silver Line (910/950) GATEWAY Line 950 Only College, OC701, SC794, USC Shuttle; CARSON 37Th St/USC Station 110 E
    Monday through Friday Effective Jun 27 2021 J Line (Silver)910/950 Northbound to El Monte (Approximate Times) Southbound to San Pedro (ApproximateTimes) SAN HARBOR LOS DOWNTOWN LOS EL EL DOWNTOWN LOS LOS HARBOR SAN PEDRO GATEWAY ANGELES ANGELES MONTE MONTE ANGELES ANGELES GATEWAY PEDRO 8 7 6 5 4 2 1 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 ) ) A A B ) ) A A (See Note (See Note El Monte Bus Station Route & 21st Pacific Harbor Beacon Lot Park/Ride Harbor Gateway Center Transit Harbor Freeway Station C Line (Green) (See Note & 7th Figueroa UNION STATION Plz (Patsarouas Bwy Sta Flower & 7th Flower Harbor Freeway Station C Line (Green) (See Note Harbor Gateway Center Transit Harbor Beacon Lot Park/Ride & 21st Pacific Route El Monte Bus Station UNION STATION Plz (Patsarouas Bwy Sta 910 — — 4:40A 4:47A 5:06A 5:16A 5:31A 910 3:30A 3:44A 3:55A 4:12A 4:19A — — 950 4:28A 4:39A 4:56 5:03 5:22 5:32 5:47 950 4:00 4:14 4:25 4:42 4:49 5:05A 5:13A 910 — — 5:12 5:19 5:38 5:48 6:03 910 4:18 4:32 4:43 5:00 5:07 — — 910 — — 5:25 5:32 5:52 6:02 6:17 950 4:36 4:50 5:01 5:18 5:25 5:41 5:49 950 5:05 5:17 5:35 5:42 6:02 6:13 6:28 910 4:50 5:04 5:15 5:32 5:39 — — 910 — — 5:44 5:51 6:12 6:23 6:38 950 5:00 5:14 5:25 5:42 5:49 6:05 6:13 910 — — 5:52 5:59 6:20 6:31 6:46 910 5:10 5:24 5:35 5:52 5:59 — — 950 5:30 5:42 6:00 6:07 6:28 6:39 6:54 950 5:20 5:34 5:45 6:02 6:09 6:25 6:33 910 — — 6:08 6:15 6:36 6:47 7:02 910 5:30 5:44 5:55 6:13 6:20 — — 910 — — 6:15 6:22 6:43 6:54 7:09 910 5:40 5:54 6:05 6:23 6:30 — — 950 5:53 6:05 6:23 6:30 6:51 7:02 7:17 950 5:48 6:02 6:13 6:31 6:38 6:54 7:02 910 — —
    [Show full text]
  • BULLETIN BOARD Bard and John Ulloth
    BULLETIN BOARD bard and John Ulloth. SO. CA. TA NEWS IN OTHER NEWS Results of the election for 2008 officers and On Saturday, Jan. 12th, Mike Jarel~ Union directors: Pacific Engineer and Past Vice President of the Southern Pacific Historical Society will President - Lionel Jones give a free talk on the operations of the Vice President - Charles Hobbs Saugus Train Station. This will be held from Executive Secretary - Dana Gabbard 2:00 to 4:00 PM at the station, 24107 San Recording Secretary - Kymberleigh Richards Fernando Rd. in Newhall (adjacent to the Treasurer - Hank Fung Metrolink station), and is presented by the Directors-at-Large - Armando Avalos, Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society Margaret Hudson, and Ken Ruben [http://www.scvhs.org]. Further information Our thanks to the election committee at 661-254-1275. (Woody Rosner, Nate Zablen and John . Ulloth) for the usual smooth handling of the SO.CA.TA member, Roy Shahbazlan recom• polling and vote count. mends the Centerlmes newsletter from the National Center for Bicycling and Walking as After our January 12th meeting, we will con- a good source of national information: vene an ad-hoc group to evaluate the Metro http://bikewalk.org/newsletter.php service change proposals for June and pre- ..... pare our-recommendations to be presented . Southern Cahfornta. Assoclatlo~of Gov~rn- . at the upcoming public hearings~"" ,\,; .".' .•..rnent:S!.'~~R..~~Tr.a1.1.sit.Summ't happens on Thursday,' March 20th from 8:00 At the Feb. 9th meeting, staff from the AM to 4:00 PM, at the Wilshire Grand Hotel, Southern California Association of Govern- 930 Wilshire Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station Bus Services (PDF)
    metro.net Union Station Bus Services MAP IS NOT TO SCALE Metro Services to/from Union Station Municipal Services Metro Local and Limited Metro Express Metro Rapid AV785 Palmdale-Lancaster Express 40 M L King Bl-Hawthorne Bl 442 Hawthorne/Lennox Station Express 704 Santa Monica Bl Rapid BBBR10 Santa Monica Express 68 Cesar Chavez Av 485 Altadena Express 728 West Olympic Bl Rapid CE431 Westwood-Palms-Rancho Park Express Metro Local or Limited Line 68 Av Stanford & Technology AV785 70 Garvey Av 487 San Gabriel Express 733 Venice Bl Rapid CE534 Century City-Westwood Express COCOX Citadel Outlets Express Metro Express Line 487 SC794 Lancaster 71 City Terrace Dr 489 Temple City Express 745 South Broadway Rapid City Park 76 Valley Bl 770 Garvey Av Rapid DASH B Chinatown-Bunker Hill-Pershing Square 745 Rye Canyon Palmdale 78 Huntington Dr-Las Tunas Dr DASH D Spring St-South Park Metro Rapid Line & Av Stanford Metro Silver Line Transportation Center 79 Huntington Dr-Arcadia DLHC Lincoln Heights-Chinatown FT492 Harbor Gateway Transit Center- Municipal Bus Line 378 Huntington Dr-Las Tunas Dr Limited-Stop Downtown LA-El Monte Station DSE Dodger Shuttle Express FT481 El Monte Station-Wilshire Center Westfield Valencia Bus Line Terminus 68 Town Center FT493 Puente Hills Mall- Diamond Bar Park & Ride Express Metro Silver Line AV785 FT495 Industry Metrolink Station and Station College of the Canyons Park & Ride Express Altadena FT497 City of Industry Park & Ride- Metro Silver Line Terminus 485 Chino Park & Ride Express Woodbury FT498 West Covina-Citrus
    [Show full text]
  • El Monte Station Connections Foothilltransit.Org
    metro.net El Monte Station Connections foothilltransit.org BUSWAY 10 Greyhound Foothill Transit El Monte Station Upper Level FT Silver Streak Discharge Only FT486 FT488 FT492 Eastbound Metro ExpressLanes Discharge Walk-in Center 24 25 26 27 28 Only Bus stop for: 23 EMT Red, EMT Green EMS Civic Ctr Main Entrance Upper Level Bus Bays for All Service B 29 22 21 20 19 18 Greyhound FT Silver Streak FT481 Metro Silver Line Metro Bike Hub FT494 Westbound (Coming Soon) RAMONA BL RAMONA BL A Metro Bus stop for: Division 9 EMS Flair Park Parking Structure Building SANTA ANITA AV El Monte Station Lower Level 1 Bus Bay A Bus Stop (on street) 267 268 487 190 194 FT178 FT269 FT282 2 Metro Rapid 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Bus Bay 577 Metro Silver Line 8 18 Bus Bay Lower Level Bus Bays Elevator 76 Eastbound Escalator 17 Bike Rail 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Bike Parking 270 176 Discharge Only ROSE 770 70 Parking Building 15-2433 ©2015 LACMTA AUG 2015 Subject to Change Destinations Lines Bus Bay or Destinations Lines Bus Bay or Destinations Lines Bus Bay or Street Stop Street Stop Street Stop 7th St/Metro Center Rail Station Metro Silver Line 18 19 Harbor Fwy Metro Rail Station Metro Silver Line 18 19 Pershing Square Metro Rail Station Metro Silver Line , 70, 76, 770, 1 2 17 18 FT Silver Streak 19 20 21 37th St/USC Busway Station Metro Silver Line 18 19 Harbor Gateway Transit Station Metro Silver Line 18 19 Pomona TransCenter ÅÍ FT Silver Streak 28 Alhambra 76, 176 6 17 Highland Park 176 6 Puente Hills Mall FT178, FT282 14 16 Altadena 267, 268 9 10 Industry Å 194, FT282
    [Show full text]