BULLETIN BOARD Bard and John Ulloth
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Transit Advocate
How to join SO.CA.TA: Yearly dues are $30.00 cates. In all other cases, permission must be ($12.00 low income). Dues are prorated on a secured from the copyright holder. quarterly basis. Disclaimer: The Southern California Transit THE TRANSIT ADVOCATE Submission of materials: ALL materials for the Advocates is not affiliated with any governmental TRANSIT ADVOCATE newsletter go to Andrew agency or transportation provider. Names and Newsletter of the Southern California Transit Advocates Novak at P.O. Box 2383, Downey California 90242 logos of agencies appear for information and or to [email protected]. Please enclose a self reference purposes only. May 2011 Vol. 19, No. 05 ISSN 1525-2892 addressed stamped envelope for returns. SO.CA.TA officers, 2011 Newsletter deadlines are the Fridays a week President: Nate Zablen before SO.CA.TA meetings, at 6:00 p.m. Pacific Vice President: Kent Landfield time, unless otherwise announced. Recording Secretary: Dana Gabbard Executive Secretary: (VACANT) Opinions: Unless clearly marked as "Editorial" or Treasurer: Edmund Buckley "Position Paper", all written material within, Directors at Large: Ken Ruben including all inserted flyers and postcards, are the J.K. Drummond expressed opinions of the authors and not Dave Snowden necessarily that of the Southern California Transit ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Advocates. Newsletter Editor: Andrew Novak Newsletter Prod. Mgr: Dana Gabbard Copyright: © 2011 Southern California Transit Webmaster: Charles Hobbs Advocates. Permission is freely granted to repro- th th duce/reprint ORIGINAL articles from the Transit NEXT SO.CA.TA MEETINGS : May 14 and June 11 at Angelus Plaza, 4th Floor, 255 S. Hill, Los Angeles Advocate, provided credit is given to both the au- thor and the Southern California Transit Advo- May 2011 — Issue 222 Southern California Transit Advocates 3010 Wilshire #362 Los Angeles, CA 90010 44¢ First 213-388-2364 Class http://www.socata.net Postage [email protected] FIRST CLASS MAIL Inside This Issue: Amtrak P42 156 at 8th Street Yard in Los Angeles on April 3, 2011. -
The Value of Bus Rapid Transit: Hedonic Price Analysis of The
The Value of Bus Rapid Transit: Hedonic Price Analysis of the EmX in Eugene, Oregon Peter Hodel & Megen Ickler Presented to the Department of Economics, University of Oregon, as partial fulfillment of requirements for honors in Economics. Under the supervision of Professor Joe Stone Abstract Transportation investments can increase the welfare of a city or region in order to create economic development. Often public transportation has the potential for economic development in three ways; sustaining and maintaining dense development and growth in the downtown core; allocating land use and development; creating and stimulating economic growth and employment opportunities. These are measured along the transit line through increase in property values, increased development projects, and changes in business activity (Neuwirth, 143). Other contributing factors to transit decisions include objectives and values, effects on various groups, downtown development and environmental quality. Different modes accomplish these goals with various efficiencies depending on their characteristics. This paper will introduce an examination of the bus rapid transit (BRT) line in the Eugene area based on changes in residential property values. Specifically, the purpose is to determine benefits in terms of the property values changes before and after the implementation of the line. We considered residential sale prices from 2002- 2012 and analyzed trends of house values across varying distances. We found a significant, negative correlation between distance from a property and the Franklin EmX line. There was no significant trend to draw from in regards to the Gateway extension but this value may have simply not had enough time to capitalize into the surrounding properties. -
Evolution of the Silver Streak “BRT- Like” Service
Evolution of the Silver Streak “BRT- Like” Service BRT Conference June 18, 2018 FOOTHILL TRANSIT FACTS • 327 Square Miles • 359 Buses In Fleet • San Gabriel Valley • 329 CNG Buses • Pomona Valley • 30 All Electric Proterra Buses • 37 Lines SLOW POPULATION GROWTH FOOTHILL TRANSIT FACTS • Began Service in December of 1988 • Formed to provide improved service • Increase local control of regional transit • UniqueSLOW Public/Private POPULATION Partnership GROWTH • Public: Joint Powers Authority • 22 member-cities • Los Angeles County • Administration Foothill Transit Employees • Private: Contracted Operations • Pomona Operation Facility – Keolis • Irwindale/ Arcadia Operations Facility – TransDev • Call Center/ Transit Stores/ Bus Stop Technicians- TransDev JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY 22 Cities and the County of Los Angeles Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3 • Claremont • Azusa • Arcadia • La VerneSLOW POPULATION• Baldwin GROWTH Park • Bradbury • Pomona • Covina • Duarte • San Dimas • Glendora • Monrovia • Walnut • Irwindale • Pasadena Cluster 4 • West Covina • Temple City • Diamond Bar Cluster 5 • El Monte • First District, County of L.A. • Industry • Fourth District, County of L.A. • La Puente • Fifth District, County of L.A. • South El Monte What is the Silver Streak • A high-speed bus system which operates like a rail line on rubber tires • Incorporates high-tech vehicles, uniform fare structure, stations not stops, and frequent service Vehicles • 60-foot articulated buses • 58-passenger seating capacity • SmartBUS equipped • Boarding through three doors Service • Replace current Line 480 • Easy connections to Metro, Metrolink, Omni, and Foothill Transit local routes Service Map • Reduce travel time by 30-40 minutes • Simple, easy to understand route SILVER STREAK BRT FEATURES (2007) • Unique Branding • Dedicated Fleet • WiSLOW-Fi POPULATION GROWTH • All Door Boarding • Exclusive Right of Way • El Monte Busway (El Monte – Union Station) TAP CARD (2009) SLOW POPULATION GROWTH . -
Full Issue 20(1)
Volume 20, No. 1, 2017 David A. King Access to Taxicabs for Unbanked Households: Juan Francisco Saldarriaga An Exploratory Analysis in New York City Dea van Lierop A New Market Segmentation Approach: Ahmed El-Geneidy Evidence from Two Canadian Cities Seyed Amir Hosein Mortazavi A Framework for Measuring the Spatial Equity in the Meisam Akbarzadeh Distribution of Public Transportation Benefits Erkan Isikli Identifying Key Factors of Rail Transit Service Quality: Nezir Aydin An Empirical Analysis for Istanbul Erkan Celik Alev Taskin Gumus Orion T. Stewart The Causal Effect of Bus Rapid Transit Anne Vernez Moudon on Changes in Transit Ridership Brian E. Saelens Xiaodong Liu Impact of Different Bus Stop Designs Yao Yang on Bus Operating Time Components Meng Meng Andreas Rau John Perry Measuring the Accuracy of Bus Rapid Transit Forecasts Inge Brechan Effect of Price Reduction and Increased Service Frequency on Public Transport Travel N C T R Joel Volinski, Editor Lisa Ravenscroft, Assistant to the Editor Patricia Ball, Managing Editor EDITORIAL BOARD Robert B. Cervero, Ph.D. William W. Millar University of California, Berkeley American Public Transportation Association Chester E. Colby Steven E. Polzin, Ph.D., P.E. E & J Consulting University of South Florida Gordon Fielding, Ph.D. Lawrence Schulman University of California, Irvine LS Associates Jose A. Gómez-Ibáñez, Ph.D. George Smerk, D.B.A. Harvard University Indiana University Naomi W. Ledé, Ph.D. Vukan R. Vuchic, Ph.D., P.E. Texas Transportation Institute University of Pennsylvania The contents of this document reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. -
April 2020 – Staff Reports (Meeting Canceled)
MONTHLY COMMISSION MATERIALS April 2020 – Staff Reports (Meeting Canceled) OVERVIEW On March 11, 2020 the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic setting forth a series of actions at the federal, state, and local levels to combat and contain the spread of the virus during this public health emergency. NVTC meeting requirements are governed by the Virginia Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (Virginia Code Chapter 37 of Title 2.2). NVTC currently does not have the legal authority to hold a meeting without a physical quorum (11 members and four jurisdictions represented). NVTC’s electronic participation is limited to General Assembly members during Session and committee meetings with a physical quorum present. NVTC’s Executive Committee determined that the April 2, 2020 Commission should be canceled to comply with Governor Northam’s ban on public gatherings of 10 or more people and to keep Commissioners, staff and the public safe. This packet of information is provided to keep Commissioners, jurisdictional staff, and the public up to date on NVTC projects and activities. This will help NVTC continue to move ahead to maximize future Commission meeting agendas. Since March 11th NVTC jurisdictional transit agencies, including WMATA and VRE, have implemented substantial changes to transit operations, many of which are being updated daily. The information provided in these materials reflect decisions as of the publication date and are subject to change. NVTC will continue to keep Commissioners informed of future meeting decisions and updated information on NVTC activities. TABLE OF CONTENTS NVTC April 2, 2020 Meeting Cancellation Notice ............................................................. 3 Item 1 Minutes of the March 5th Meeting ................................................................... -
Union Station Area Connections
metro.net Union Station Area Connections 1 Destinations Lines Stops Scale One Unit: /4 Mile Chinese Historical Lincoln/Cypress Station Society Chinatown Alhambra 76, 78, 79, 378, 485 B CL 5 8 7 BE Heritage and Altadena via Lake 485 7 A 1 Metro Local Stop RN Visitors Center Arcadia 78, 79, 378 B C AR T Metro Local and D S Artesia Transit Center n Metro Silver Line n J 1 S A RapidL Stop Y T G Baldwin Park Metro Silver Line n to 190 N Å K A W I ST I Chung King Chinese R E Beverly Hills Metro Purple Line o to 20, 720; 704 5 Metro Rapid Line UM Bamboo R Los Angeles S N I Cultural P EY T D Road Art Plaza State S W S Bob Hope Airport (BUR) ÅÍ 94, 794, Metrolink Å, Amtrak Í W 2 N A BA T C Center D Galleries HU M N Metro Silver Line Stop S NG B Historical 110 D K o E I O A U Boyle Heights Metro Gold Line , 30, 68, 770 B R N CP T G C O G T L A N T S I N Park N A Mandarin K G 5 7 I N Broadway 30, 40, 42, 730, 740, 745 A O N FIN G L E IN L N N Metro Silver Line G W N B U Y Plaza P R H E Burbank Å 94, 96, 794 W 2 O C I E E Paci>c L L N C Y D T T E Cal Poly Pomona Metro Silver Line n to 190, 194 K Metro Rail StationT A S M E JU L S W Alliance N Y U G J R Y I W F N and Entrance G L n S W W Y Carson Metro Silver Line to 246 J Medical Y N G U R B O N E T M A I R O L N P A N I 5 6 O E T Center U L Y Century City 704, 728, CE534 E 3 O W R E D S D S M L A E E W I T Metro Red LineA C M U S E IN O O W G A N Y U S City Terrace 70, 71 E B C I P L V O F LE L T n N M Covina Å Metro Silver Line to 190 K Metro Purple Line G L IN E A S Crenshaw District 40, 42, 740 -
System-Wide Transit Corridor Plan for the San Bernardino Valley
System-Wide Transit Corridor Plan for the San Bernardino Valley sbX E Street Corridor BRT Project Prepared for: Omnitrans Prepared by: Parsons Patti Post & Associates October 2010 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 5 1.1 SAFETEA-LU ............................................................................................................ 6 1.2 2004 System-Wide Plan ............................................................................................ 7 1.3 Development of the E Street Corridor ....................................................................... 7 1.4 California SB 375 .................................................................................................... 17 1.5 San Bernardino County Long Range Transit Plan ................................................... 18 1.6 Regionally Approved Travel Demand Model ........................................................... 21 1.7 Roles and Responsibilities ...................................................................................... 21 1.8 Opportunities to Shape Development/Redevelopment ............................................ 21 1.8.1 Economic Development ............................................................................. 21 1.8.2 Transit-Oriented Developments ................................................................ -
Bus Rapid Transit and Carbon Offsets FINAL
Bus Rapid Transit and Carbon Offsets Issues Paper Prepared for: California Climate Action Registry Adam Millard-Ball Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates and IPER, Stanford University November 2008 Table of Contents 1 Introduction and Key Conclusions...........................................................................................................3 2 Bus Rapid Transit ........................................................................................................................................5 2.1 Definition..............................................................................................................................................5 2.2 Number of Future Projects................................................................................................................6 2.3 Project Development Process and Motivations..............................................................................7 2.4 Costs and Funding...............................................................................................................................8 2.5 Emission Reduction Benefits.............................................................................................................9 2.6 Other Environmental Benefits ........................................................................................................13 3 Existing Methodologies ............................................................................................................................14 3.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................................14 -
Los Angeles County Bus Rapid Transit and Street Design Improvement Study
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles County Bus Rapid Transit and Street Design Improvement Study Final Report December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles County Bus Rapid Transit and Street Design Improvement Study Final Report December 2013 Prepared by: PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF In cooperation with: Sam Schwartz Engineering and CHS Consulting Los Angeles County Bus Rapid Transit and Final Report Street Design Improvement Study Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. ES‐1 Introduction and Study Background .......................................................................................................... I‐1 Study Purpose and Need ......................................................................................................................... I‐1 Overall Approach ..................................................................................................................................... I‐2 Initial Screening Stages and Results ......................................................................................................... II‐1 Initial corridor selection (108) ............................................................................................................... II‐1 Refined List of Candidate Corridors (43 Corridors) .............................................................................. -
Bus and Rail System
Metro Local & Limited Approximate frequency in minutes Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Line Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve 2 6-10 10-12 18-60b 13-15 20-60b 15-20 25-60b 4 9-12 15 15-30f 12-15 15-30f 15-20 15-30f 10 5-10 20 30-60 18-20 30-60 20 30-60 14 4-8 15 30-60 16-30 30-60 18-25 30-60 16 3-8 8-10 30 6-10 30 8-15 30 18 3-10 10 30-60 10-12 15-60 10-15 15-60 20 6-10 10-12 30f 15-20 30f 20 30f 28 6-12 20 30 9-10 20-30 14-15 30 30 7-10 12-15 20-60 10-13 30-60 10 30-60 33 7-15 15-20 30-60f 15-20 30-60f 20-25 30-60f 35 12 12 30-60 15 15-60 20 30-60 37 4-8 15 30-60 16-30 30-60 18-25 30-60 38 12-24 24 25-60 30 30-60 40 30-60 40 5-10 15-16 18-60 10-22 20-60 12-24 28-60 42 20-25 30-32 60 22-65 60 60-85 60 45 5-8 10-12 25-60 9-15 20-60 12-15 30-60 48 5-10 20 30-60 18-20 30-60 40 30-60 51 4-15 20-24 36-65 7-30 40-60 10-30 40-60 52 17-20 20-24 60 22-32 43-50 20-30 60 metro.net 53 6-10 12-15 30-60 12-15 30-60 17-19 34-60 55 4-15 20 60 15-20 60 20-30 60 60 5-10 15-20 20-60g 10-15 30-60g 10-12 30-60g 62 15-27 30-32 40-60 40-60 60 60 60 66 2-8 12 21-60 5-15 20-60 15 35-60 68 13-17 20 30-60 20 40-60 15-20 40-60 70 10-12 15 25-60 16 25-60 12-13 20-60 71 15-35 35 - 60 - 60 - 76 12-15 16 21-60 15-20 35-60 15-20 30-60 78 10-20 16-40 20-60 15-30 50-60 15-40 60 79 20-30 40-45 60 40-45 60 34-45 60 81 6-10 15 22-60 15 30-60 20 20-60 83 18-25 25 30-60 25 30-60 30 60 Bus and Rail System 84 13-17 20 30-60 20 40-60 15-20 40-60 90 23-30 60 120 60 120 60 120 91 28-40 60 120 60 120 60 120 92 14-24 22-26 60 21-30 60 40 60 94 15-20 30 60 20 30-70 20 50-70 96 24-30 28 - 50-55 -
Report April 2015
REPORT APRIL 2015 SEAMLESS TRANSIT How to make Bay Area public transit function like one rational, easy-to-use system Contents Seamless Transit is generously supported by 4 Executive summary the Silicon Valley Community Foundation. 6 The Bay Area needs a more integrated public transit system The SPUR Board of directors adopted this report as official policy on November 19, 2014. 14 A patchwork approach to transit creates challenges Primary author 28 How and where the region can integrate public transit Ratna Amin 33 CASE STUDY: Hannover, Germany Co-author 34 Recommendations Sara Barz 38 CASE STUDY: London, England Contributors 43 CASE STUDY: Seattle, Washington Brian Stokle, Jake Rosen, Eric Eidlin, Dan Feeney 49 Conclusion Primary photography 50 Plan of action Sergio Ruiz We are grateful to the staff and leadership of the region’s transit and transportation agencies who informed this project. In particular, we thank the staff and leadership of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, who have worked on these issues for many years. We also thank the SPUR Board, the SPUR Transportation Policy Board, Tony Bruzzone, Joshua Karlin-Resnick and the many other civic leaders and transportation experts who reviewed this material and participated in interviews and workshops about how we can make transit work in this region. Edited by: Valerie Sinzdak and Karen Steen SPUR c/o Impact Hub Oakland 654 Mission Street 76 South First Street 2323 Broadway San Francisco, CA 94105 San Jose, CA 95113 Oakland CA, 94612 tel. 415.781.8726 tel. 408.638.0083 tel. 510.250.8210 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Seamless Transit How to make Bay Area public transit function like one rational, easy-to-use system Executive summary The Bay Area has more than two dozen different Difficult transfers between operators public transit operators — and yet only 3 percent Many of the region’s transit hubs were not designed of all trips here are made using transit. -
Full Meeting Packet
Jefferson Area Regional Transit Partnership (RTP) Business Meeting AGENDA 4:00 p.m., Thursday, February 27, 2020 Water Street Center, 407 E. Water Street, Charlottesville, VA 22902 Item Time† Description 1 Call to Order 2 Introductions 4:00- Matters from the Public: Limit 3 minutes per speaker 3 4:10 4 ✓ Minutes from December 19, 2019 4:10- 5 ✓ Election of Vice Chair 4:15 4:15- 6 RTP Orientation 4:30 4:30- 7 ✓ Bylaws Revisions 4:40 4:40- 8 CAT Advisory Bylaws 4:50 4:50 – 9 Leadership Charlottesville 2020 Project – Video Presentation of Transit Rider Surveys 5:15 5:15- 10 Electric Scooter data 5:30 5:30- VTA & RTP Listening Tour Responses 11 5:35 5:35- 12 Review of DRPT Grant Applications 5:45 5:45- Transit Service Provider Updates – CAT/JAUNT/UTS/Rideshare 13 5:50 CAT Advisory Board Update 5:50- 14 Other Business 6:00 15 6:00 Adjourn Next meeting: March 26, 2020- Business Meeting Future Meeting Topics 1. Blacksburg Visit The Regional Transit Partnership (RTP) serves as an official advisory board, created by the City of Charlottesville, Albemarle County and JAUNT, in Partnership with the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation to rovide recommendations to decision-makers on transit-related matters. Times are approximate ✓ Requires a vote of the Partnership Charlottesville-Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization POB 1505, 401 E. Water Street, Charlottesville, VA 22902 www.tjpdc.org (434) 979-7310 phone ● (434) 979-1597 fax ● [email protected] email _________________________________________________________________ Thomas Jefferson Regional Transit Partnership October 24, 2019 4:00 p.m.