DOCSLIB.ORG

Does Saeed Mortazavi's Case Reflect a Power Struggle in Iran?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Does Saeed Mortazavi's Case Reflect a Power Struggle in Iran? Artical Name : Score-settling: Artical Subject : Does Saeed Mortazavi¶s Case Reflect a Power Struggle In Iran? Publish Date: 07/12/2017 Auther Name: Future for Advanced Research and Studies Subject : The sentencing Saeed Mortazavi, the former chief prosecutor of Tehran, over charges of ordering the torture of prisoners in June 2009, to two years in prison has led to an escalation of conflicts between Iran¶s political forces and opening up issues of human rights violations and rampant corruption in state institutions. Of note, the sentence meted to Mortazavi came amid a recent exchange of accusations between former president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his political rivals from the conservative fundamentalists, namely Ali Larijani, the speaker of the Consultative Assembly (parliament), and his brother Sadeq Amoli Larijani, the head of the judiciary, two figures close to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. The scope of accusations also include foreign policy issues such as the nuclear program and international sanctions imposed before the nuclear deal was signed in mid-2015. Multiple ConsiderationsThe recent escalation of Mortazavi¶s case on the political scene can be explained as follows:Firstly, ex-president Ahmadinejad deliberately continued his attack on the Larijanis and sought to justify the expansion of international sanctions imposed on Iran over its nuclear program before the deal. He claimed that it was the stances that Ali Larijani took, when he was chief nuclear negotiator and Secretary of Supreme National Security Council, that led to the escalation of the sanctions. It was the same period when sharp disagreements arose between Larijani and Ahmadinejad that ultimately led to Larjani's removal from post as chief nuclear negotiator.After corruption cases, that had happened during his presidency, were re-opened recently, Ahmadinejad claimed that Larijani failed to obey his instructions in dealing with questions raised by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) about Iran¶s nuclear activities, and that this failure was the reason why the international sanctions were imposed by the UN Security Council, which led to serious consequences for the Iranian economy, including the collapse of its currency, rising inflation, unemployment and poverty rates.Ahmadinejad also hinted that Larijani played a role in blocking a trilateral nuclear fuel swap deal reached between Iran, Turkey and Brazil in May 18, 2010 to settle the nuclear crisis. As per the agreement, Iran would export uranium enriched to 3.5% purity in exchange for uranium enriched to 20% purity for its research nuclear reactor in Tehran.In his view, his political rivals¶sought to block the deal to prevent any political achievements concerning this issue in particular that would have tilt the political balances of power in Iran against Larijani-led wing of conservative fundamentalists. It is worth noting that Mortazavi¶s case in particular was at the center of crisis between Ahmadinejad and Larijani on February 3, 2013, when the ex- president took advantage of his participation in the Consultative Assembly to defend the minister of labour Abdolreza Sheik Al-Islam from a bid by the parliament to depose him. Then, he shed light on what he called corruption cases in which individuals from the Larijani family are involved.He played a video purporting to show Fazel Larijani and Mortazavi, with the former offering to use his family¶s influence in removing obstacles blocking the establishment of a private company in return for a stake in its projects. Apparently, it was not enough for the Larijani brothers to try to prevent Ahmadinejad from enabling one of his supporters to win the presidential elections in June in that year, through supporting candidate Hassan Rouhani, who would become president. They also insisted on reopening corruption cases dating back to the tenure of the ex-president, using in particular their family¶s influence in the judiciary.This, perhaps, cannot be dissociated from the current controversy in Iran over the issues exposed by the recent earthquake that hit western Iran on November 12 killing 482 people, injuring 12380 others and destroying some 30000 houses some of which were built during Ahmadinejad¶s presidency as part of a social support program to fend off the repercussions of international sanctions.Mitigating PressureSecondly, President Rouhani is making efforts to offset pressure from reformists attacking him for not fulfilling significant commitments he made in the lead up to elections, most importantly promoting political and social freedoms.That is, the current government appears to be seeking to take advantage of Mortazavi¶s case to prove that it is serious in addressing thorny issues such as human rights violations perpetrated against supporters of the reformist movement during the June 2009 protests. The protests broke out when the so-called Green Movement rejected the results of the presidential elections in which Ahmadinejad won a second presidential term.Mortazavi was accused of ordering torture, which has caused the death of detained protesters, including Mohsen Rouh Amini, a postgraduate student of electromechanical engineering at Tehran University, at Kahrizak Detention Center in July 2009. It was Amini¶s death under torture that led to sentencing Mortazavi for two years in prison.Counter MessagesThirdly, the Iranian regime is trying to assimilate international criticism of human rights violations in Iran that drew international condemnations from rights watchdogs and world powers including the United States. The United States can exploit the condemnations for its bid to impose fresh sanctions on Iran. International criticism escalated after the expatriate Iranian opposition forces succeeded in shedding fresh light on violations against its supporters inside Iran, including the so-called 1988 Massacre of political prisoners that was carried out by prominent figures on orders from Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Perpetrators include Ebrahim Raisi whom Khamenei appointed at the Expediency Discernment Council, Mostafa Pourmohammadi, Minister of Justice in Rouhani's government. That said, it can possibly be argued that the escalating political struggle in iran is likely to continue in the coming period driven in particular by the current regional and international pressure on Iran that would lead to the reopening of more corruption cases and human rights violations. 9/24/2021 10:09:54 AM 1 / 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IRAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY the Islamic Republic of Iran
    IRAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Islamic Republic of Iran is a constitutional, theocratic republic in which Shia Muslim clergy and political leaders vetted by the clergy dominate the key power structures. Government legitimacy is based on the twin pillars of popular sovereignty--albeit restricted--and the rule of the supreme leader of the Islamic Revolution. The current supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was chosen by a directly elected body of religious leaders, the Assembly of Experts, in 1989. Khamenei’s writ dominates the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. He directly controls the armed forces and indirectly controls internal security forces, the judiciary, and other key institutions. The legislative branch is the popularly elected 290-seat Islamic Consultative Assembly, or Majlis. The unelected 12-member Guardian Council reviews all legislation the Majlis passes to ensure adherence to Islamic and constitutional principles; it also screens presidential and Majlis candidates for eligibility. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was reelected president in June 2009 in a multiparty election that was generally considered neither free nor fair. There were numerous instances in which elements of the security forces acted independently of civilian control. Demonstrations by opposition groups, university students, and others increased during the first few months of the year, inspired in part by events of the Arab Spring. In February hundreds of protesters throughout the country staged rallies to show solidarity with protesters in Tunisia and Egypt. The government responded harshly to protesters and critics, arresting, torturing, and prosecuting them for their dissent. As part of its crackdown, the government increased its oppression of media and the arts, arresting and imprisoning dozens of journalists, bloggers, poets, actors, filmmakers, and artists throughout the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of Expression and Assembly, Deteriorated in 2006
    January 2007 Country Summary Iran Respect for basic human rights in Iran, especially freedom of expression and assembly, deteriorated in 2006. The government routinely tortures and mistreats detained dissidents, including through prolonged solitary confinement. The Judiciary, which is accountable to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, is responsible for many serious human rights violations. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s cabinet is dominated by former intelligence and security officials, some of whom have been implicated in serious human rights violations, such as the assassination of dissident intellectuals. Under his administration, the Ministry of Information, which essentially performs intelligence functions, has substantially increased its surveillance of dissidents, civil society activists, and journalists. Freedom of Expression Iranian authorities systematically suppress freedom of expression and opinion by closing newspapers and imprisoning journalists and editors. The few independent dailies that remain heavily self-censor. Many writers and intellectuals have left the country, are in prison, or have ceased to be critical. In September 2006 the Ministry of Culture and Guidance closed the reformist daily, Shargh, and shut down two reformist journals, Nameh and Hafez. In October the Ministry shut down a new reformist daily, Roozgar, only three days after it started publication. During the year the Ministry of Information summoned and interrogated dozens of journalists critical of the government. In 2006 the authorities also targeted websites and internet journalists in an effort to prevent online dissemination of news and information. The government systematically blocks websites inside Iran and abroad that carry political news and analysis. In September 2006 Esmail Radkani, director-general of the government- controlled Information Technology Company, announced that his company is blocking access to 10 million “unauthorized” websites on orders from the Judiciary and other authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Islamic Republic at 31
    The Islamic Republic at 31 Post-election Abuses Show Serious Human Rights Crisis Copyright © 2010 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-601-2 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org February 2010 1-56432-601-2 The Islamic Republic at 31 Post-election Abuses Show Serious Human Rights Crisis Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 4 Violence against Peaceful Protestors Following the Election ........................................... 4 Raids in Residential Areas ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Iran 2018 Human Rights Report
    IRAN 2018 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Islamic Republic of Iran is an authoritarian theocratic republic with a Shia Islamic political system based on velayat-e faqih (guardianship of the jurist or governance by the jurist). Shia clergy, most notably the rahbar (supreme jurist or supreme leader), and political leaders vetted by the clergy dominate key power structures. The supreme leader is the head of state. The members of the Assembly of Experts are in theory directly elected in popular elections, and the assembly selects and may dismiss the supreme leader. The candidates for the Assembly of Experts, however, are vetted by the Guardian Council (see below) and are therefore selected indirectly by the supreme leader himself. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has held the position since 1989. He has direct or indirect control over the legislative and executive branches of government through unelected councils under his authority. The supreme leader holds constitutional authority over the judiciary, government- run media, and armed forces, and indirectly controls internal security forces and other key institutions. While mechanisms for popular election exist for the president, who is head of government, and for the Islamic Consultative Assembly (parliament or majles), the unelected Guardian Council vets candidates and controls the election process. The supreme leader appoints half of the 12-member Guardian Council, while the head of the judiciary (who is appointed by the supreme leader) appoints the other half. Candidate vetting excluded all but six candidates of 1,636 individuals who registered for the 2017 presidential race. In May 2017 voters re-elected Hassan Rouhani as president.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Document
    Iran Human Rights Documentation Center The Iran Human Rights Documentation Center (IHRDC) believes that the development of an accountability movement and a culture of human rights in Iran are crucial to the long-term peace and security of the country and the Middle East region. As numerous examples have illustrated, the removal of an authoritarian regime does not necessarily lead to an improved human rights situation if institutions and civil society are weak, or if a culture of human rights and democratic governance has not been cultivated. By providing Iranians with comprehensive human rights reports, data about past and present human rights violations, and information about international human rights standards, particularly the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the IHRDC programs will strengthen Iranians’ ability to demand accountability, reform public institutions, and promote transparency and respect for human rights. Encouraging a culture of human rights within Iranian society as a whole will allow political and legal reforms to have real and lasting weight. The IHRDC seeks to: Establish a comprehensive and objective historical record of the human rights situation in Iran, and on the basis of this record, establish responsibility for patterns of human rights abuses; Make the record available in an archive that is accessible to the public for research and educational purposes; Promote accountability, respect for human rights and the rule of law in Iran; and Encourage an informed dialogue on the human rights situation in Iran among scholars and the general public in Iran and abroad. Iran Human Rights Documentation Center 129 Church Street New Haven, Connecticut 06510, USA Tel: +1-(203)-772-2218 Fax: +1-(203)-772-1782 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.iranhrdc.org Front cover: A scene from a warehouse on the grounds of Ghezelhesar Prison in Karaj, the largest prison in Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • Meet the Larijanis, a Power in Iran's New Aristocracy News & Analysis
    16 September 25, 2016 News & Analysis Iran Meet the Larijanis, a power in Iran’s new aristocracy Gareth Smyth as his son Faridaddin’s role in the leader’s office. Haddad-Adel’s second daughter London is married to Rouhollah Rahmani, a US-born computer scientist who or many centuries, Iran, before returning to Iran worked for under various dynasties, Microsoft and Amazon. established an aristocracy knitted together by privi- The best known of five lege and marriage. Under sons born to Ayatollah FReza Shah, who assumed the crown Mirza Hashem Amoli is in 1925, and his successor, Moham- Ali Larijani, 59, the mad Reza Shah, the Pahlavi dynas- ty presided over a country that in parliamentary popular belief was ruled by an oli- speaker. garchy of “one thousand families”. Under the Islamic Republic, some But of all the influential families, have whispered of a new thousand the Larijanis are perhaps the most families. “My father recently used prominent. Still the best known of the term about those benefiting five sons born to Ayatollah Mirza from sanctions relief,” an Iranian Hashem Amoli is Ali Larijani, 59, academic, speaking on the condi- who as parliamentary speaker tion of anonymity, told The Arab helped steer the landmark July Weekly. 2015 nuclear agreement with US- “In its first decade [after 1979], led world powers through the leg- the Islamic Republic was informal, islature. many of the clergy intermarried A consummate insider, he was with the bazaar and then a younger formerly an IRGC commander, generation with the [Islamic] Revo- minister of Labour, head of state lutionary Guards [Corps] (IRGC), broadcasting and the top security the bureaucracy, the universities official.
    [Show full text]
  • From Protest to Prison: Iran One Year After the Election 5
    from protest to pri son IrAn onE yEAr AftEr tHE ELECtIon amnesty international is a global movement of 2.8 million supporters, members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign to end grave abuses of human rights. our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of human rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. amnesty international publications first published in 2010 by amnesty international publications international secretariat peter Benenson house 1 easton street london Wc1X 0DW United Kingdom www.amnesty.org © amnesty international publications 2010 index: mDe 13/062/2010 original language: english printed by amnesty international, international secretariat, United Kingdom all rights reserved. this publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. the copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. for copying in any other circumstances, or for re-use in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. Cover phot o: Demonstration in tehran following the disputed 12 June 2009 presidential election. © Javad montazeri Back cover phot o: a mass “show trial” in tehran’s revolutionary court, 25 august 2009; defendants are dressed in grey. © ap/pa photo/fars news agency, hasan Ghaedi CONTENTS 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................5 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran April 2004
    IRAN COUNTRY REPORT April 2004 Country Information & Policy Unit IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY DIRECTORATE HOME OFFICE, UNITED KINGDOM Iran Country Report April 2004 CONTENTS 1 Scope of Document 1.1 - 1.7 2 Geography 2.1 - 2.2 3 Economy 3.1 - 3.9 4 History 4.1 Pre - 1979 4.2 - 4.3 1979 - 1989 4.4 - 4.9 1990 - 1996 4.10 - 4.13 1997 - 1999 4.14 - 4.20 2000 4.21 - 4.28 2001 to Current 4.29 - 4.37 Student Unrest - June 2003 4.38 - 4.42 Parliamentary Elections - February 2004 4.43 - 4.45 5 State Structures The Constitution 5.1 Citizenship and Nationality 5.2 - 5.4 Political System 5.5 - 5.9 Political Parties 5.10 - 5.15 Judiciary 5.16 - 5.34 Court Documentation 5.35 - 5.37 Legal Rights and Detention 5.38 - 5.42 Death Penalty 5.43 - 5.45 Internal Security 5.46 - 5.52 Prisons and Prison Conditions 5.53 - 5.58 Military Service 5.59 - 5.61 Medical Services 5.62 Drugs 5.63 Drug Addiction 5.64 - 5.65 Psychiatric Treatment 5.66 - 5.68 HIV/AIDS 5.69 - 5.71 People with Disabilities 5.72 Educational System 5.73 - 5.76 6 Human Rights 6.A Human Rights issues General 6.1 - 6.18 Freedom of Speech and the Media 6.19 - 6.28 Press Law 6.29 - 6.48 Internet and Satellite 6.49 - 6.53 Freedom of Religion 6.54 - 6.60 Legal Framework 6.61 - 6.62 Sunni Muslims 6.63 Christians 6.64 - 6.68 Apostasy/Conversions 6.69 - 6.72 Jews 6.73 - 6.78 Zoroastrians 6.79 - 6.80 Sabeans (Mandeans) 6.81 Baha'is 6.82 - 6.95 Freedom of Assembly and Association 6.96 - 6.103 Employment Rights 6.104 - 6.109 People Trafficking 6.110 Freedom of Movement 6.111 - 6.119 Refugees in Iran 6.120
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Iranian Repression Architects of Human Rights Abuse in the Islamic Republic
    Profiles of Iranian Repression Architects of Human Rights Abuse in the Islamic Republic Tzvi Kahn October 2018 Forewords by Dr. Ahmed Shaheed & Rose Parris Richter Prof. Irwin Cotler FOUNDATION FOR DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACIES FOUNDATION Profiles of Iranian Repression Architects of Human Rights Abuse in the Islamic Republic Tzvi Kahn Forewords by Dr. Ahmed Shaheed & Rose Parris Richter Prof. Irwin Cotler October 2018 FDD PRESS A division of the FOUNDATION FOR DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACIES Washington, DC Profiles of Iranian Repression: Architects of Human Rights Abuse in the Islamic Republic Table of Contents FOREWORD by Dr. Ahmed Shaheed and Rose Parris Richter...........................................................................6 FOREWORD by Prof. Irwin Cotler ......................................................................................................................7 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................12 U.S. Sanctions Law and Previous Designations ........................................................................................................ 12 Iran’s Human Rights Abuses and the Trump Administration ................................................................................ 14 EBRAHIM RAISI, Former Presidential Candidate, Custodian of Astan Quds Razavi ........................................16 MAHMOUD ALAVI, Minister of Intelligence ....................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's Censorship of Wikipedia
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Center for Global Communication Studies Iran Media Program (CGCS) 11-2013 Citation Filtered: Iran’s Censorship of Wikipedia Nima Nazeri Collin Anderson Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/iranmediaprogram Part of the Communication Technology and New Media Commons, and the Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons Recommended Citation Nazeri, Nima and Anderson, Collin. (2013). Citation Filtered: Iran’s Censorship of Wikipedia. Iran Media Program. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/iranmediaprogram/10 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/iranmediaprogram/10 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Citation Filtered: Iran’s Censorship of Wikipedia Abstract Using proxy servers in Iran, researchers Collin Anderson and Nima Nazeri identified every blocked Persian language Wikipedia article and divided blocked pages into ten categories to determine the type of content state censors are most adverse. In total, 963 blocked articles were found, covering a range of socio- political and sexual content including politics, journalism, the arts, religion, sex, sexuality, and human rights. Censors repeatedly targeted Wikipedia pages about government rivals, minority religious beliefs, and criticisms of the state, officials, and the police. Just under half of the blocked Wiki-pages are biographies, including pages about individuals the authorities have allegedly detained or killed. Based on prior research, it is known that Iran’s Internet filtration relies on blacklists of specifically designated URLs and URL keywords. Keyword filtration blindly blocks pages that contain prohibited character patterns in the URL. Sexual content is the main target of keywords, for example most keywords are sexual and/or profane terms.
    [Show full text]
  • عوﺿوﻣﻟا مﺳا Does Saeed Mortazavi's Case Reflect a ﻋﻧوان اﻟﻣوﺿوع
    Score-settling: : ωϭοϭϣϟ΍ϡγ΍ Does Saeed Mortazavi¶s Case Reflect a : ωϭοϭϣϟ΍ϥ΍ϭϧϋ Power Struggle In Iran? 07/12/2017 : έηϧϟ΍ΦϳέΎΗ ΔϣΩϘΗϣϟ΍ΕΎγ΍έΩϟ΍ϭΙΎΣΑϸϟϝΑϘΗγϣϟ΍ίϛέϣ : ΏΗΎϛϟ΍ϡγ΍ : ωϭοϭϣϟ΍ 10/1/2021 4:54:17 PM 1 / 2 The sentencing Saeed Mortazavi, the former chief prosecutor of Tehran, over charges of ordering the torture of prisoners in June 2009, to two years in prison has led to an escalation of conflicts between Iran¶s political forces and opening up issues of human rights violations and rampant corruption in state institutions. Of note, the sentence meted to Mortazavi came amid a recent exchange of accusations between former president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his political rivals from the conservative fundamentalists, namely Ali Larijani, the speaker of the Consultative Assembly (parliament), and his brother Sadeq Amoli Larijani, the head of the judiciary, two figures close to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. The scope of accusations also include foreign policy issues such as the nuclear program and international sanctions imposed before the nuclear deal was signed in mid-2015. Multiple ConsiderationsThe recent escalation of Mortazavi¶s case on the political scene can be explained as follows:Firstly, ex-president Ahmadinejad deliberately continued his attack on the Larijanis and sought to justify the expansion of international sanctions imposed on Iran over its nuclear program before the deal. He claimed that it was the stances that Ali Larijani took, when he was chief nuclear negotiator and Secretary of Supreme National Security Council,
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Egyptian Military and the Iranian Revolutionary Guards in Connection to the Emergence Theory
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Honors College 5-2010 An Assessment of the Egyptian Military and the Iranian Revolutionary Guards in Connection to the Emergence Theory Pardis Delijani Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors Part of the Political Theory Commons Recommended Citation Delijani, Pardis, "An Assessment of the Egyptian Military and the Iranian Revolutionary Guards in Connection to the Emergence Theory" (2010). Honors College. 47. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors/47 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN ASSESSMENT OF THE EGYPTIAN MILITARY AND THE IRANIAN REVOLUTIONARY GUARDS IN CONNECTION TO THE EMERGENCE THEORY by Pardis Delijani A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for a Degree with Honors (International Affairs) The Honors College University of Maine May 2012 Advisory Committee: Seth Singleton, Adjunct Professor of International Relations, Advisor Steve Cohn, Professor of Sociology Paul Holman, Adjunct Professor of Political Science Kim Huisman, Associate Professor of Sociology Richard Powell, Professor of Political Science Abstract: The thesis covers an in-depth analysis of the internal operations of the Egyptian military and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corp. In light of recent rebellions in Egypt and Iran, the paper will examine how the security, economic, and political role of these two institutions has led to Egypt’s betrayal of President Mubarak, and the IRGC’s loyalty to the Iranian leadership.
    [Show full text]