The Health Impact of Transit Work

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Health Impact of Transit Work The Health Impact of Urban Mass Transportation Work in New York City Steven Markowitz MD Center for the Biology of Natural Systems Queens College City University of New York Dave Newman, M.A., M.S. New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health Michael Frumin Robin Gillespie, M.A., M.P.H. Mount Sinai School of Medicine July 2005 This report was funded through a grant from the New York State Legislature through the New York State Department of Health to the Transport Workers Union Local 100, President Roger Toussaint. Table of Contents Chapters Page Executive Summary i Preface iii 1. Introduction Steven Markowitz 1 2. Illnesses and Injuries among Transit Workers 6 Steven Markowitz 3. Safety and Health Hazards in Urban Mass Transit 22 Dave Newman 4. Musculoskeletal Risk Factors and Disorders 58 Robin Gillespie 5. Transit Worker Data Sources 80 Michael Frumin 6. Current and Planned Transit Research 96 Steven Markowitz 7. Conclusion Steven Markowitz 112 Executive Summary The mass public transportation system in New York City is of critical importance and astonishing magnitude. The economy, the environment and the overall welfare of New York and its businesses and residents depend upon the subways and buses. These subways and buses carry over 7,000,000 passengers per day. To do so, New York City Transit operates nearly 6,500 subway cars, which travel 685 track miles, and 4,500 buses, which traverse over 2,000 route miles. In 2003, New York City Transit had an operating budget of $4.9 billion and employed 48,110 workers. These many workers are essential to the efficiency and safety of the public transit system, which, in turn, relies upon the safety and well-being of transit workers in the performance of their jobs. These concerns have special poignancy in view of the heightened emphasis on the security of public transport. Transit workers develop important, common diseases and injuries to which their work is likely to be a causal or contributing factor. Such injuries and diseases have been identified by a substantial body of scientific research, including epidemiologic and mechanism-based studies. The major health outcomes of concern are cardiovascular diseases, which include hypertension, heart disease, and stroke; lung and bladder cancer and possibly other cancers; emphysema and asthma; post-traumatic stress disorder and other stress-related psychological disturbances; and low back pain and other musculoskeletal disorders. Most available studies address the risk of disease among bus drivers; comparable studies among subway, maintenance and other transit workers are few. Occupational hazards of New York City transit workers are uncommonly diverse and encompass much of the spectrum of occupational health. They include chemical, safety, ergonomic, physical, psychological, and biologic hazards. These exposures are matched to important, sometimes life-threatening, outcomes, such as asbestos exposure and lung cancer; hypertension and heart disease; traumatic death and post-traumatic stress disorder; live electricity and electrocution; and vibration and disabling back injuries. Such diversity of hazards and associated diseases and injuries in a single industry is highly unusual in occupational health and presents an extraordinary opportunity for synergy in causing ill health. The bus driver experiences both job-related hypertension and exposure to air pollutants such as fine particulates and carbon monoxide, which work in concert to damage the heart. Similarly, the subway worker has the stress of keeping to tight time schedules, serving a demanding public, and suffering frequent loud noise, all of which contribute to high blood pressure. This diversity also presents a considerable challenge to develop and apply appropriate policies and practices of prevention and control. Indeed, few other single industries encompass as large a part of the National Occupational Research Agenda established the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health as does the urban mass transit industry in New York City and other metropolitan areas. Current knowledge about the nature and extent of occupational disease, disability and injury experienced by New York City transit workers is limited, principally due to the lack of a coherent, comprehensive, integrated system to capture that information. Sufficient information exists at present i to warrant a re-examination of health and welfare policies and practices to maximize the health protection of transit workers and to alleviate the deleterious impacts of transit work on health. At the same time, development of a research and surveillance program that better measures the impact of transit work on health is critically needed. Such a program would be vital to assess the effectiveness of future interventions to limit the negative impact of transit worker on health. Creation of a university-based Center of Excellence of Occupational Health and Safety of Transit Workers in New York City would provide an excellent mechanism for overcoming the current knowledge deficit and for ensuring the development of a program of research and surveillance that is responsive to labor and management of the New York City transit industry. The goals of such a Center will be to assemble a multi-disciplinary research team; to develop a unified research database; to create a hazard, illness and injury surveillance system; to conduct epidemiologic analyses of transit worker health; to support pilot research studies; and to develop and provide appropriate methods of participation of labor and management in Center direction and activities. Such a Center would give direction and coherence to future transit research. It would serve as an incubator for new inquiries into the nature and extent of health and safety problems of transit work and would provide a mechanism for the rapid translation of new scientific advances into practice in the transit industry. It is a propitious moment to make progress in transit worker safety and health. The threat of terrorism to public transport systems has prompted the general public to have an acute understanding of the importance of a healthy and vigilant transit workforce to help prevent and respond to emergencies. Both union and management have a mutual interest and show evidence of recent cooperation (i.e. – development of safety dispute resolution process; joint walk-around inspection policy). Ready sources of data, especially health and job title data, exist, providing the research community with a rich and accessible resource. New York City has an active, highly regarded occupational health and safety research community located among its universities to assist in this endeavor. There are a large number of transit workers in New York City, which will enhance the scientific validity of relevant research and make the impact of that research meaningful to many people. Finally, the transit industry has enormous economic and environmental importance to New York City. It is, thus, an excellent window of time to intensify current efforts to protect the health of New York City transit workers and to acquire additional knowledge about relevant hazards in order to improve strategies to prevent avoidable death and disability among transit workers. ii Preface This report was written by several researchers and practitioners of occupational safety and health in the New York metropolitan area. Funding was provided through a grant from the New York State Legislature administered by the New York State Department of Health to the Transport Workers Union Local 100. We benefited greatly from comments and advice provided by an external review committee of nationally-renowned occupational health scientists and professionals working principally in New York. The members are listed on the following page. While all reviewers were positive in their comments on a draft version of this report, the listing of their names as members of the External Review Committee in this document does not constitute their endorsement of every statement in this report. The authors made diligent efforts to modify the report in response to the comments provided by this Committee. Indeed, the report was greatly strengthened by the reviews. The authors are grateful for their comments and suggestions. iii External Review Committee William S. Beckett, MD Professor Departments of Environmental Medicine and of Medicine University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry Paul W. Brandt-Rauf, M.D., Sc.D., Dr.P.H., Professor and Chairman,, Department of Environmental Health Sciences Mailman School of Public Health Columbia University John Dement, Ph.D. CIH Professor Division of Occupational and Environment Department of Community and Family Medicine Duke University Medical Center Wajdy Hailoo, MD, DsC Professor Director, Division of Environmental and Occupational Medicine Department of Preventive Medicine School of Medicine, Stonybrook University Philip J. Landrigan MD, DsC Ethyl Wise Professor of Community Medicine Chairman, Department of Community and Preventive Medicine Mount Sinai Medical Center and School of Medicine Frank Mirer PhD Director, Occupational Safety and Health United Auto Workers Detroit, Michigan William N. Rom, MD, MPH Sol and Judith Bergstein Professor of Medicine and Environmental Medicine Director, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Director, Chest Service at Bellevue Hospital Center. Bellevue Hospital NYU School of Medicine Dominick Tuminaro, JD Workers’ Compensation Attorney Brecher, Fishman,
Recommended publications
  • City Environmental Quality Review ENVIRONMENTAL
    EAS FULL FORM PAGE 1 City Environmental Quality Review ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STATEMENT (EAS) FULL FORM Please fill out and submit to the appropriate agency (see instructions) Part I: GENERAL INFORMATION PROJECT NAME Theater Subdistrict Fund Text Amendment 1. Reference Numbers CEQR REFERENCE NUMBER (to be assigned by lead agency) BSA REFERENCE NUMBER (if applicable) 16DCP136M ULURP REFERENCE NUMBER (if applicable) OTHER REFERENCE NUMBER(S) (if applicable) N 160254 ZRM , N 160254(A)ZRM (e.g., legislative intro, CAPA) 2a. Lead Agency Information 2b. Applicant Information NAME OF LEAD AGENCY NAME OF APPLICANT NYC Department of City Planning NYC Department of City Planning NAME OF LEAD AGENCY CONTACT PERSON NAME OF APPLICANT’S REPRESENTATIVE OR CONTACT PERSON Robert Dobruskin, AICP Edith Hsu- Chen ADDRESS 120 Broadway, 31st Floor ADDRESS 120 Broadway, 31st Floor CITY New York STATE NY ZIP 10271 CITY New York STATE NY ZIP 10271 TELEPHONE 212- 720-3423 EMAIL TELEPHONE 212-720-3437 EMAIL [email protected] [email protected] 3. Action Classification and Type SEQRA Classification UNLISTED TYPE I: Specify Category (see 6 NYCRR 617.4 and NYC Executive Order 91 of 1977, as amended): Action Type (refer to Chapter 2, “Establishing the Analysis Framework” for guidance) LOCALIZED ACTION, SITE SPECIFIC LOCALIZED ACTION, SMALL AREA GENERIC ACTION 4. Project Description The Department of City Planning is proposing a zoning text amendment to the New York City Zoning Resolution (ZR) Section 81-744 (a) (Transfer of development rights from listed theaters) to modify the contribution rate from transferable development rights from theaters listed in ZR Section 81-742 (Listed theaters).
    [Show full text]
  • Too Cool—Families Catch the Cool!
    2010 SPRING Cool Culture® provides 50,000 underserved families with free, unlimited sponsored by JAQUELINE KENNEDY access to ONASSIS 90 cultural institutionsRESEVOIR - so that parents can provide their children withCENTRAL PARK 80 Hanson Place, Suite 604, Brooklyn, NY 11217 www.coolculture.org educational experiences that will help them succeed in school and life. CENTRAL PARK HARLEM MEER Malky, Simcha, Stanley and Avi Mayerfeld. Fi e tzpa t trick t . Vaness e a Griffi v th and Ys Y abe l Fitzpat FIFTH AVENUE d rick. n a o FIFTH AVENUE i g r e S , a n i t n e g r A Isabella, Sophia and Ethel Zaldaña 108TH ST 107TH ST 106TH ST 103RD ST 105TH ST 102ND ST 104TH ST 101ST ST 100TH ST 99TH ST 98TH ST 97TH ST 96TH ST 95TH ST 94TH ST 93RD ST 92ND ST 91ST ST 90TH ST 89TH ST 88TH ST 87TH ST 86TH ST 85TH ST 84TH ST 83RD ST 82ND ST 81ST ST Felicia and Omaria Williams F e l ic ia a nd he t C C O o o m o a h ri W o To ol— illiams atc l! Families C The Cool Culture community couldn't choose just one. “I really liked came together to Catch the Cool on making stuff and meeting my friend and June 8th at the Museum Mile getting a poster by (artist) Michael Albert,” she said. The siblings – along with Festival! Thousands painted, drew, their sister Ysabel (one), mom Yvette and aunt danced and partied on Fifth Avenue from Vanessa Griffith– participated in art activities 105th Street to 82nd Street, dropping in that included crafting monkey ears at The museums along the way.
    [Show full text]
  • October 5, 2016 Veronique Hakim President, New York City Transit
    UNITED STATES HOUSE THE NEW YORK THE NEW YORK THE COUNCIL OF THE OF REPRESENTATIVES STATE SENATE STATE ASSEMBLY CITY OF NEW YORK October 5, 2016 Veronique Hakim President, New York City Transit Metropolitan Transportation Authority 2 Broadway New York, NY 1004 Dear President Hakim, Please restore the M15 Select Bus Service at 72nd Street. The M15 Limited stopped at 72nd Street until it was phased out in favor of M15 Select Bus Service. With high bus-dependent populations, infrequent local service, crosstown bus service, hospitals, community support and opening of the Second Avenue Subway with a station at 72nd Street, now is the perfect opportunity to increase ridership by restoring M15 Select Bus Service at 72nd Street. 72nd Street Only Location Omitted from Select Bus Service When Select Bus Service was introduced to First and Second Avenues on the M15 route, Select Bus Stations replaced Limited Service stops in every location above Houston Street other than East 72nd Street. Since October 2010, residents living in the East 72nd Street area, for example at 73rd off York Avenue, now must choose between walking three avenues and six blocks, more than half a mile, to a Select Bus Service bus station at 67th or 79th Streets and Second Avenue, versus half that distance to 72nd Street. Walking more than half a mile in both directions is simply too far for many residents. High Concentration of Seniors and Children Need Select Bus Service at 72nd Street The neighborhood that would be served by a Select Bus Service station at 72nd Street includes Census Tracts in Manhattan number 124, 126, 132, and 134 spanning from 69th to 79th between 3rd Avenue and the East River with a population of 44,756, one of the highest near any Select Bus station: 8,679 or 32.7% of households include children (under 18) or seniors (65 and over) who may rely on bus service due to age: o 3,326 or 12.5% of households have children under 18 years-old.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Bus Service in New York a Thesis Presented to The
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Columbia University Academic Commons Improving Bus Service in New York A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Architecture and Planning COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment Of the requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Urban Planning By Charles Romanow May 2018 Abstract New York City’s transportation system is in a state of disarray. City street are clogged with taxi’s and for-hire vehicles, subway platforms are packed with straphangers waiting for delayed trains and buses barely travel faster than pedestrians. The bureaucracy of City and State government in the region causes piecemeal improvements which do not keep up with the state of disrepair. Bus service is particularly poor, moving at rates incomparable with the rest of the country. New York has recently made successful efforts at improving bus speeds, but only so much can be done amidst a city of gridlock. Bus systems around the world faced similar challenges and successfully implemented improvements. A toolbox of near-immediate and long- term options are at New York’s disposal dealing directly with bus service as well indirect causes of poor bus service. The failing subway system has prompted public discussion concerning bus service. A significant cause of poor service in New York is congestion. A number of measures are capable of improving congestion and consequently, bus service. Due to the city’s limited capacity at implementing short-term solutions, the most highly problematic routes should receive priority. Routes with slow speeds, high rates of bunching and high ridership are concentrated in Manhattan and Downtown Brooklyn which also cater to the most subway riders.
    [Show full text]
  • City Guide to Sacred Spaces
    NYC Sacred Space International / Tour Sacred Spaces City Guide to Sacred Spaces – New York, NY: Manhattan and Brooklyn © Sacred Space International City Guide to Sacred Spaces in New York City CITY GUIDE TO SACRED SPACES NEW YORK, NY Key Map 2 Table of Sacred New York: Introduction to finding sacred spaces in New York 3 Individual Sacred Space Descriptions: Contents Map A 4 [NYC 01] Islamic Cultural Center of New York (ICCNY) 5 [NYC 02] Bethesda Fountain in Central Park 8 [NYC 03] Central Synagogue 11 [NYC 04] St. Peter’s Church 14 [NYC 05] St. Malachy’s – The Actor’s Chapel 17 Map B 20 [NYC 06] Brotherhood Synagogue 21 [NYC 07] East End Temple 24 [NYC 08] Grace Church 27 [NYC 09] African Burial Ground National Monument 30 [NYC 10] Brooklyn Bridge 32 Map C 35 [NYC 11] St. Ann & The Holy Trinity Church 38 [NYC 12] Fort Greene Park & Prison Ship Martyrs’ Monument 41 [NYC 13] Lafayette Avenue Presbyterian Church 44 [NYC 14] St. Nicholas Antiochian Orthodox Cathedral 47 Bibliography and Acknowledgments 48 Credits 49 A B © Sacred Space International C City Guide to Sacred Spaces in New York City 2 CITY GUIDE TO SACRED SPACES NEW YORK, NY Sacred New York INTRODUCTION TO FINDING SACRED SPACES IN THE CITY In this densely populated city, we found a rich diversity of sacred space, which gave us a sense of quiet and otherworldliness. Our real problem was how to pare down our list. After a long process, we narrowed our field to the boroughs of Manhattan and Brooklyn and focused on less traveled and possibly under-appreciated sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Manhattan Bus Map
    Manhattan Bus Map Bx7 to Address Locator 1 Riverdale/263 St via Riverdale Av Manhattan Bus Routes BRIDGE To locate an avenue address, cancel BROADWAY BRIDGE Bx20 to 9 M1 Harlem - Soho the last figure, divide by 2, then add HENRY HUDSON A Riverdale/246 St V via Henry Washington Heights - East Village or subtract the key number below. Hudson Pkwy M2 The answer is the nearest numbered INWOOD HILL BAKER FIELD 100 NATURE CENTER M3 Fort George - East Village cross street, approximately. M4 The Cloisters - E 32 St To find addresses on numbered cross streets, remember that INWOOD W 215 ST M5 GW Bridge - Midtown numbers increase east or west from HILL Bx 1 215 St PARK Inwood 7 M7 Harlem - 14th Street 5 Avenue, which runs north-south. Bx ISHAM 20 West Village - East Village PARK M8 Avenue A . add 3 ISHAM ST M9 Battery Park City - Kips Bay Avenue B . add 3 A Inwood-207 St W 207 ST Avenue C . add 3 TENTH AV TENTH M10 Harlem - Columbus Circle DYCKMAN HOUSE UNIVERSITY Avenue D . add 3 E Bx Bx HEIGHTS 20 12 M11 Riverbank Park - West Village 1 Avenue . add 3 W 204 ST Bx BRIDGE 12 SBS 2 Avenue . add 3 1 M12 Columbus Circle - Abingdon Square 207 St Bx12 to Bay 3 Avenue . add 10 Plaza via M14A SBS Lower E Side - Chelsea Piers Dyckman Fordham Rd and 4 Avenue . add 8 St A BROADWAY SHERMAN AV Pelham Pkwy (to DYCKMAN ST Orchard Beach M14D SBS Lower E Side - Abingdon Square 5 Avenue: THE summers only) CLOISTERS up to 200 .
    [Show full text]
  • Manhattan Bus Service
    Manhattan Bus Service AM = 7–9AM • NOON = 11AM–1PM • PM = 4–7PM • EVE = 7–9 PM • NITE = 12 MID–4AM More detailed service information, timetables and schedules are available on the web at mta.info. Or call 511 and say “Subways and Buses”. Timetables and schedules are also displayed at most bus stops. Note: traffic and other conditions can affect scheduled arrivals and departures. M1 5th/Madison Avenues M20 7th/8th Avenues/Hudson Street M101 3rd/Lexington/Amsterdam Avenues Operates between West 147 St / Lenox Av in Harlem and Grand St in SoHo, Operates between South Ferry and W 63 St /Broadway (Lincoln Center), Operates between West 193 St /Fort George Av and East 8 St / 3 Av, daily: daily. On weekdays, some buses operate between West 147 St / Lenox Av daily: AVG. FREQUENCY (MIN.) AVG. FREQUENCY (MIN.)* and East 8 St /4 Av in the East Village. On weekends, all buses operate TOWARD SOUTH FERRY TOWARD LINCOLN CTR AM NOON PM EVE NITE TOWARD W 193 ST TOWARD E 8 ST AM NOON PM EVE NITE between West 147 St / Lenox Av and Grand St. Limited-Stop service is WEEKDAYS: 6:15AM – 12:30AM 6:40AM – 12:30AM 20 30 22 30 – WEEKDAYS: All times All times ........LIMITED ONLY........ 60 SATURDAYS: 8:00AM – 12:45AM 8:00AM – 12:45AM 20 20 15 20 – LTD provided during weekday rush hours, downtown in the morning and uptown SATURDAYS: All times All times 12 .....ONLY..... 12 60 SUNDAYS: 6:59AM – 12:20AM 7:00AM – 12:15AM 20 20 20 20 – in the afternoon.
    [Show full text]
  • Midtown Manhattan Pedestrian Network Development Project
    Midtown Manhattan Pedestrian Network Development Project Rudolph W. Giuliani Mayor New York City Joseph B. Rose Director Department of City Planning Wilbur L. Chapman Commissioner Department of Transportation June 2000 MIDTOWN MANHATTAN PEDESTRIAN NETWORK DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PHASE I Final Report June 2000 Rudolph W. Giuliani, Mayor City of New York Joseph B. Rose, Director Department of City Planning Wilbur L. Chapman, Commissioner Department of Transportation The preparation of this report was fi nanced in part through funds from the U.S. Department of Transpor- tation, Federal Highway Administration. Under the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Effi ciency Act (ISTEA), this two-year project, is a joint undertaking by New York City’s Department of City Planning (DCP) and Department of Trans- portation (DOT) as a component of DOT’s Pedestrian Network Development. This document is dissem- inated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The contents of this report refl ect the views of the author, who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily refl ect the offi cial views or policies of the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specifi ca- tion, or regulation. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iii INTRODUCTION 1 Goals and Objectives 1 Project Scope 2 On-going Street Improvement Projects and Zoning Actions 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D.2 Transportation
    APPENDIX D.2 TRANSPORTATION Appendix D.2: Transportation A. SURFACE TRANSIT EXISTING LOCAL BUS SERVICE This section of the Appendix provides detailed information on existing bus service through the study area. Other information on surface transit, including a description of impacts is provided in Chapter 5C. Table D.2-1 highlights the major corridors through Manhattan’s East Side and the key bus routes that operate along them. Over 600 buses operate in the study area during peak hours and, as presented in Table D.2-2, the East Midtown area has the highest volume of peak hour local buses. Table D.2-1 Overview of Major Bus Corridors and Routes on Manhattan’s East Side Corridor Key Routes Fifth and Madison Avenues M1, M2, M3, M4, M5 (only on Fifth Avenue), and, to a lesser degree, Q32 Lexington and Third Avenues M98, M101, M102, and M103 First and Second Avenues M15 York Avenue M31 Avenues A, B, C, and D M9, M14, and M21 East Broadway and Madison Street (Lower East Side) M9 and M22 Allen Street (Lower East Side) and Water Street (Lower M15 Manhattan) Table D.2-2 Scheduled Local Buses in the Peak Hours AM No. PM No. of of Study Area Zone Buses Buses East Harlem (M1, M2, M3, M4, M15, M60, M96, M98, M100, M101, M102, M103, M106, 183 155 M116, and BX15) Upper East Side (M1, M2, M3, M4, M15, M30, M31, M66, M72, M79, M86, M96, M98, M101, 267 214 M102, M103, M106, Q32, Q60, and Q101) East Midtown (M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, M15, M16, M21, M27, M30, M31, M34, M42, M50, M57, 360 265 M98, M101, M102, M103, M104, Q32, Q60, and Q101) Gramercy Park / Union Square (M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, M6, M7, M9, M14, M15, M16, M21, 255 216 M23, M34, M98, M101, M102, M103, and Q32) Lower East Side (M1, M2, M3, M5, M6, M7, M8, M9, M14, M15, M21, M22, M101, M102, 191 156 M103, and B39) Lower Manhattan (M1, M6, M9, M15, M20, M21, M22, M103, and B51) 91 78 Source: 2000 Bus Route Profiles D.2-1 Second Avenue Subway FEIS Frequency of bus service is generally high, with scheduled headways (the time between buses) on some routes as low as 1.5 minutes during the peak periods (e.g., on the M15 in the AM peak).
    [Show full text]
  • Symbolism in the Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger
    JIHOČESKÁ UNIVERZITA V ČESKÝCH BUDĚJOVICÍCH FILOZOFICKÁ FAKULTA ÚSTAV ANGLISTIKY BAKALÁŘSKÁ PRÁCE SYMBOLISM IN THE CATCHER IN THE RYE BY J.D. SALINGER Vedoucí práce: Richard Stock, Ph.D. Autor práce: Jana Šojdelová Studijní obor: Bohemistika – Anglistika Ročník: 2. 2014 Prohlašuji, že svoji bakalářskou práci jsem vypracovala samostatně pouze s použitím pramenů a literatury uvedených v seznamu citované literatury. Prohlašuji, že v souladu s § 47b zákona č. 111/1998 Sb. v platném znění souhlasím se zveřejněním své bakalářské práce, a to v nezkrácené podobě elektronickou cestou ve veřejně přístupné části databáze STAG provozované Jihočeskou univerzitou v Českých Budějovicích na jejích internetových stránkách, a to se zachováním mého autorského práva k odevzdanému textu této kvalifikační práce. Souhlasím dále s tím, aby toutéž elektronickou cestou byly v souladu s uvedeným ustanovením zákona č. 111/1998 Sb. zveřejněny posudky školitele a oponentů práce i záznam o průběhu a výsledku obhajoby kvalifikační práce. Rovněž souhlasím s porovnáním textu mé kvalifikační práce s databází kvalifikačních prací Theses.cz provozovanou Národním registrem vysokoškolských kvalifikačních prací a systémem na odhalování plagiátů. České Budějovice, 1. 5. 2014 …………………………… Acknowledgements I would like to sincerely thank my supervisor Richard Stock, Ph.D. for his valuable suggestions, insight and help. I am grateful for the constant support from my family and friends, and their willingness to listen to my endless “catcher” talk. Finally, my thanks also belong to J.D. Salinger and Holden, for making me feel understood and not alone. Anotace Nejpodstatnějším motivem románu J. D. Salingera, Kdo chytá v žitě, je všudypřítomný boj hlavního hrdiny Holdena Caulfielda s dospíváním, který ho nakonec po neúspěšném hledání svého místa ve společnosti dožene k nervovému zhroucení.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper West Side Central Park
    Neighborhood Map ¯ 325 661 675 667 668 666 660 2487 2488 301 299 237 235 201 199 101 99 1 W 92 Street W 92 Street Central Sol Bloom Playground Baptist Church e v i r D Safari 320 646 645 t 2468 2465 Playground s a Goddard Riverside E Trinity School Community Center Avenue 5 301 299 237 235 201 199 1 W 91 Street W 91 Street Annunciation Greek Orthodox Church Wise Towers Houses 619 The Eldorado 625 626 2446 301 299 237 235 201 199 101 W 90 Street W 90 Street St. Gregory’s Central Park Playground Loop West Side Jacqueline Kennedy Community Garden M7 M104 M10 M7 M11 608 607 M104 M10 M11 Onassis Reservoir Broadway 301 299 231 229 201 199 101 99 1 Central Park West Park Central West End Avenue End West W 89 Street W 89 Street Avenue Amsterdam Playground Avenue Columbus Eighty Nine LXXXIX 595 588 587 588 2406 5 Avenue 5 301 299 235 233 201 199 101 99 W 88 Street W 88 Street W e st D r iv 574 e 561 575 574 572 577 2393 2394 W 87 Street Garden 86 St 301 299 M86 249 247 201 199 101 99 1 M1 LTD M86SBS SBS W 87 Street W 87 Street St. Ignatius Downtown M4 LTD of Antioch Only M86 SBS Episcopal Church Bridge No. 27 555 555 556 540 2379 2372 Church of West Park St. Paul & M86SBS Broadway Presbyterian M86 M86SBS SBS 301 St. Andrew 239 237 201 Church M86 101 99 1 Amsterdam Avenue Amsterdam SBS Columbus Avenue West End Avenue End West M86SBS M86SBS M86SBS M86SBS 86 Street Transverse W 86 St W 86 Street M86 M86SBS M86SBS M86SBS M86SBS SBS South Gate M86 M86 Spector House Central Park LTD M2 SBS 86 St SBS Bard Graduate Playground Loop e Bridge No.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 117 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 117 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 167 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, APRIL 22, 2021 No. 70 Senate The Senate met at 10 a.m. and was RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY One important message is to the called to order by the President pro LEADER Asian-American community. By pass- tempore (Mr. LEAHY). The PRESIDING OFFICER. The ma- ing this bill, we say to the Asian-Amer- jority leader is recognized. ican community that their government f is paying attention to them, has heard f their concerns, and will respond to pro- PRAYER COVID–19 HATE CRIMES ACT tect them; and, second, by passing this The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- Mr. SCHUMER. Madam President, bill, we will send a message to the fered the following prayer: after nearly 2 weeks of Democrats and country that should be all too obvious Let us pray. Republicans working together, the by now. Hate crimes will not be toler- Eternal God, nature speaks of Your Senate is going to take a final vote on ated, and Federal law enforcement will glory. With every sunrise and sunset, the anti-Asian hate crimes bill later do everything in its power to detect, we are reminded of Your power and this morning. The vote today on the deter, and, if necessary, prosecute majesty. anti-Asian hate crimes bill is proof crimes to the full extent of the law. Lord, we think of You when we watch that when the Senate is given the op- So this bill has a one-two punch, to the birds You guide through the bound- portunity to work, the Senate can assure the Asian-American community less skies with flawless flight.
    [Show full text]