00 Prelimscs3.Indd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

00 Prelimscs3.Indd THE BattlE OF ISSUS The Aleian plain and the Issus plain comprise a narrow, to utilize that confined space to neutralize the Persian’s vast fairly isolated, horseshoe-shaped lowland. They lie adjacent numerical superiority, Alexander marched with his troops as to the sea and are hemmed in by the Taurus mountain far south as the town of Myriandrus, prepared his camp for range in the north and west and the Amanus mountains in battle, and dispatched scouts to reconnoiter the Pass [3]. the east. Access in and out of these plains would have been Underestimating the severity of Alexander’s illness, Darius extremely difficult, except at three passes: (1) a northwestern apparently misread the Greek’s delay at Soli as cowardice. gate, known today as the Gülek Pass and in antiquity as the He also overestimated his own army’s abilities in the face Cilician Gates;399 (2) a northeastern gate, known today as of a numerically inferior adversary. Learning of Alexander’s the Bahçe Pass and in antiquity as the Amanus Gates;400 and southward advance from Issus, Darius was advised to remain (3) a southern gate, known today as the Belen Pass and in out in the Amuq plain and pitch the battle there in a wide- antiquity as the Syrian Gates.401 open terrain ideally suited to his army’s size. He rejected that Alexander the Great set out from Gordion in the summer counsel and decided instead to lead his forces on a flanking of 333 b.c. [map 87], marching southeast across Galatia maneuver some 50 miles north. He hoped to enter the Issus and western Cappadocia as far as the city of Tyana (Aurelia plain unopposed through the Amanus Gates, sever Alexander’s Antoniniana). From there he was able to travel on what later logistical and supply line in the direction of Anatolia and would become the Via Taurus, and thus he negotiated the Greece, and surprise the Macedonian from the rear. It was Taurus range via the Cilician Gates.402 Upon taking control of an extremely daring and shrewd move that indeed outwitted Cilicia and the town of Tarsus, Alexander unwisely plunged Alexander and gave Darius an advantage—temporarily. Darius into the water of the Cydnus River, which was extremely brought his hordes down into Issus where he mutilated or cold from the melting snow of the Taurus.403 By the time his massacred Alexander’s men left there, and then he pitched his army had arrived on the Mediterranean coast at Soli, he had battle line along the north bank of the Pinarus River [4]. contracted cramps and a severe chill that developed into a Perhaps unaware of the presence of the Amanus Gates, tropical fever. In rather short order, Alexander slipped into a Alexander was surprised beyond belief by reports of Darius’s coma, with his life in peril [1]. cunning and skillful maneuver.405 He required scouts to It was apparently during the few months Alexander was confirm such news before he would move his army away near death that Darius III set out from Babylon with his vast from Myriandrus and the Syrian Gates. They verified that Persian imperial army, comprised of light infantry, heavy the Persian army had in fact already pitched its battle line infantry, cavalry, charioteers, archers, and slingers—a total behind Alexander near the Pinarus, so the Macedonian was estimated to be 300,000, or maybe even twice that many.404 obliged to turn his army around and quickly march northward, Potential numerical exaggeration notwithstanding, this establishing his own battle line somewhere between the so- army must have been quite large and awe-inspiring. It was called “pillar of Jonah” and the south bank of the Pinarus [5]. well fed and very well paid. Accompanying the military For Darius, the advantage of surprise soon paled into a host was a resplendent retinue of some 600 mules and 300 disadvantage of space. From the onset of the battle, it was clear camels carrying an imperial treasury, 365 richly dressed royal that Darius had made a major miscalculation. The coastal plain concubines, the royal chariot of the Persian deity Ahuramazda, between the Amanus foothills and the sea near the Pinarus is an array of silver altars bearing the Persians’ “sacred fire,” less than three miles wide. Darius possessed almost infinitely numerous priests and other noncombatants, and part of superior numbers and technology, yet his brash tactical Darius’s own royal family. Sending his treasury and the bulk decision left him little opportunity to deploy that superiority of his supply train on to Damascus, Darius took up a position effectively. Perhaps unwittingly on both of their parts, Darius at Sochi, a town of uncertain location that must have been had played right into Alexander’s hands.406 Almost before situated somewhere near the Amuq plain not too far east of the battle had been completely joined, Darius and his army the Syrian Gates [2]. realized the imminence of defeat [6]. They attempted to retreat Alexander had largely recuperated by early October when and escape into the lofty Amanus mountains. Alexander and he learned of Darius’s encampment at Sochi. He immediately his cavalry pursued them for some 25 miles east, inflicting moved his forces across the Aleian plain as far as the town of many more casualties as a result of paths clogged by great Issus, where he left his sick and wounded soldiers. Convinced numbers of retreating Persians. Classical sources report that Darius would attack via the Syrian Gates, and wishing Persian losses as high as 110,000 men407 [7]. 212 The Moody Atlas of the Bible The Battle of Issus map 89 ABC s u r u City a T T S. City (uncertain location) ia M Darius led his forces north and V S skirted the Amanus mountains U by passing through the Mountain pass R Cilician Gates Amanus Gates instead, Clash of forces U (Gülek Pass) approaching Issus from the A north and thereby severing Belen Modern place name T Alexander’s supply train; Convinced that Darius would moving a little farther south, come through the Syrian Gates, he established his battle Bahçe 1 Alexander marched east across line along the north 1 the Aleian Plain and came to Issus; bank of the Pinarus river. leaving some of his sick and Amanus Gates Route of Alexander wounded soldiers there, Alexander (Bahçe Pass) on the Via Taurus, marched south through the through the “pillar of Jonah” (a narrow dele 4 Cilician Gates, and on near the coast) and came to to the town of Soli, the town of Myriandrus, Realizing defeat, Darius and his where he encamped. where he prepared for battle. army quickly retreated eastward . R in an attempt to escape; 1 us many Persian casualties m occurred as paths became Adana ra C ) y clogged by great numbers Tarsus y R. P d us of retreating soldiers. n r a S PLAIN u S SSU ( Issus I . s . R 6 S R n . P R. ha Battle of Issus. inarus 7 ey T S Pina GULF OF rus R. 3 M A . L E ALEXANDRETTA R Soli I A N P u L S A S I a N r “pillar of Jonah” a U K Iskenderun N (Alexandretta) M A Sochi 2 E D Myriandrus 5 M 2 I T E Magarsa Learning of Darius’s skillful maneuver, A R Alexander took the bulk of his army and R Belen A retraced his steps northward, back N through the pillar of Jonah; E he established his battle line Syrian Gates A (Belen Pass) A N somewhere between the M U Q P L A I N pillar and the south S bank of the Pinarus. Route of Darius III from Babylon 01020 30 Miles E A to the town of Sochi, where 2 he encamped (the bulk of his supply train was sent ahead 0102030 40 Kilometers to Damascus). ABC Following the rout, Alexander returned to the battle scene and a worldview—began to assume a prominent role in at Issus, claimed control of Darius’s royal chariot and imperial this region. Hellenism entailed the introduction of Greek insignia, took a bath in Darius’s large bathtub, donned a language, government, taxation, education, coinage, city Persian robe, and feasted at a banquet off Persian gold plates. planning, entertainment, architecture, religion, and pantheon. The next morning Alexander met Darius’s mother, wife, The Hellenistic concept of cultural osmosis and a “world princesses, and the royal heir. It was only a matter of days until culture” featured equality and uniformity. Being separate Alexander’s troops had occupied Damascus, retrieved the from society was thought to be dangerous. So an array of Persian war chest, and were paid for the first time in months. distinctive problems and responses arose within Judaism.408 Alexander decided against the immediate eastward pursuit of One can confidently state that Hellenism greatly accelerated Darius. Instead, by marching south across Syria and Phoenicia, the process of the rise of Jewish sectarianism (Sadducees, he effectively neutralized any residual influence of Persian Pharisees, Essenes, Nazarenes, Minim, Zealots), which, at its naval efforts along ports on the eastern Mediterranean. core, represented varying and competing responses to the Moreover, a southward march would also give him Egypt and fundamental challenge of this new worldview. Varying degrees provide protection on his southern flank. He would set off to of acculturation also produced a corruption of the Jerusalem face Darius another day. [See commentary with map 87.] priesthood,409 which led ultimately to the Maccabean revolt Military academies and textbooks carefully scrutinize the and paved the way for the arrival of Rome into Jerusalem and strategic and tactical aspects of the battle of Issus.
Recommended publications
  • Hadrian and the Greek East
    HADRIAN AND THE GREEK EAST: IMPERIAL POLICY AND COMMUNICATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Demetrios Kritsotakis, B.A, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Fritz Graf, Adviser Professor Tom Hawkins ____________________________ Professor Anthony Kaldellis Adviser Greek and Latin Graduate Program Copyright by Demetrios Kritsotakis 2008 ABSTRACT The Roman Emperor Hadrian pursued a policy of unification of the vast Empire. After his accession, he abandoned the expansionist policy of his predecessor Trajan and focused on securing the frontiers of the empire and on maintaining its stability. Of the utmost importance was the further integration and participation in his program of the peoples of the Greek East, especially of the Greek mainland and Asia Minor. Hadrian now invited them to become active members of the empire. By his lengthy travels and benefactions to the people of the region and by the creation of the Panhellenion, Hadrian attempted to create a second center of the Empire. Rome, in the West, was the first center; now a second one, in the East, would draw together the Greek people on both sides of the Aegean Sea. Thus he could accelerate the unification of the empire by focusing on its two most important elements, Romans and Greeks. Hadrian channeled his intentions in a number of ways, including the use of specific iconographical types on the coinage of his reign and religious language and themes in his interactions with the Greeks. In both cases it becomes evident that the Greeks not only understood his messages, but they also reacted in a positive way.
    [Show full text]
  • 295 Emanuela Borgia (Rome) CILICIA and the ROMAN EMPIRE
    EMANUELA BORGIA, CILICIA AND THE ROMAN EMPIRE STUDIA EUROPAEA GNESNENSIA 16/2017 ISSN 2082-5951 DOI 10.14746/seg.2017.16.15 Emanuela Borgia (Rome) CILICIA AND THE ROMAN EMPIRE: REFLECTIONS ON PROVINCIA CILICIA AND ITS ROMANISATION Abstract This paper aims at the study of the Roman province of Cilicia, whose formation process was quite long (from the 1st century BC to 72 AD) and complicated by various events. Firstly, it will focus on a more precise determination of the geographic limits of the region, which are not clear and quite ambiguous in the ancient sources. Secondly, the author will thoroughly analyze the formation of the province itself and its progressive Romanization. Finally, political organization of Cilicia within the Roman empire in its different forms throughout time will be taken into account. Key words Cilicia, provincia Cilicia, Roman empire, Romanization, client kings 295 STUDIA EUROPAEA GNESNENSIA 16/2017 · ROME AND THE PROVINCES Quos timuit superat, quos superavit amat (Rut. Nam., De Reditu suo, I, 72) This paper attempts a systematic approach to the study of the Roman province of Cilicia, whose formation process was quite long and characterized by a complicated sequence of historical and political events. The main question is formulated drawing on – though in a different geographic context – the words of G. Alföldy1: can we consider Cilicia a „typical” province of the Roman empire and how can we determine the peculiarities of this province? Moreover, always recalling a point emphasized by G. Alföldy, we have to take into account that, in order to understand the characteristics of a province, it is fundamental to appreciate its level of Romanization and its importance within the empire from the economic, political, military and cultural points of view2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Seleucid Research Bibliography
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Online Research @ Cardiff SELEUCID RESEARCH BIBLIOGRAPHY Draft 1.1 – Updated 27 March, 2013 compiled by Altay Coskun and Alex McAuley 1) Specialist Editions of Primary Sources: Ager IA Ager, Sheila: Interstate Arbitrations in the Greek World, 337–90 BC, Berkeley 1996. Austin2 Austin, Michel M.: The Hellenistic World from Alexander to the Roman Conquest. A Selection of Ancient Sources in Translation. Second Edition, Cambridge 2006. Bringmann/Steuben Bringmann, Klaus/ von Steuben, Hans (eds.): Schenkungen hellenistischer Herrscher an griechische Städte und Heiligtümer, Part 1, Berlin 1995. del Monte del Monte, Giuseppe F.: Testi dalla Babilonia Ellenistica. Volume I: Testi cronografici, Pisa 1997. Schoene, Alfred/ Petermann, H./ Roediger, R.: Eusebi Chronicorum canonum quae supersunt, 1Berlin 1866, Nd. (=2. Aufl.) Dublin 1967. FGrH Jacoby, Felix: Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker, Leiden Teil II, 1961/83; Teil III, 1950/55. Houghton/Lorber, SC Houghton, Arthur/Lorber, Catharine: Seleucid Coins. A Comprehensive Catalogue. With Metrological Tables by Brian Kritt. Part I: Seleucus I through Antiochus III. Volume I: Introduction, Maps, and Catalogue, Volume II: Appendices, Indices, and Plates, New York & London 2002. I.Didyma Rehm, Albert: Die Inschriften von Didyma, ed. posthum. by Richard Harder, Berlin 1958 (=Theodor Wiegand: Didyma, Zweiter Teil: Die Inschriften, von Albert Rehm). I.Erythrai I–II Engelmann, Helmut/Merkelbach, Reinhold: Die Inschriften von Erythrai und Klazomenai, Teil I (Nr. 1–200); Teil 2 (Nr. 201–536), Bonn 1972/73. (IGSK 1–2) I.Iasos I–II Blümel, Wolfgang: Die Inschriften von Iasos, 2 vols., Bonn 1985.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Tsjcl Certamen Novice Division Round 1
    2017 TSJCL CERTAMEN NOVICE DIVISION ROUND 1 TU 1 What mythological group was made up of Thalia, Terpsichore, and seven others? THE MUSES B1 Who was the mother of the Muses? MNEMOSYNE B2 In one story, the Muses were said to have been born when what creature touched the Helicon spring? PEGASUS TU 2 From what Latin verb with what meaning do we get the English words overt and aperture? APERIO = TO OPEN, UNCOVER, DISCLOSE B1 From what Latin verb with what meaning do we get the English words augment and auction? AUGEO = TO INCREASE B2 From what Latin verb with what meaning do we get the English word obedience? AUDIO = TO HEAR, LISTEN TO TU 3 For the verb capio, capere give the 3rd person, plural, future, active, indicative CAPIENT B1 Change capient to the future perfect CEPERINT B2 Change ceperint to the passive voice CAPTI ERUNT TU 4 What structure located between the Palatine and Aventine Hills was known for its chariot racing? CIRCUS MAXIMUS B1&B2 The emperor Domitian added two colored factions to the original four. For five points each, name these colors PURPLE & GOLD 1 2017 TSJCL CERTAMEN NOVICE DIVISION ROUND 1 TU 5 Say in Latin: Do you like learning the Latin language? AMASNE / AMATISNE / DILIGISNE / DILIGITISNE DISCERE LINGUAM LATINAM? B1 Say in Latin: You are not going to school tomorrow, are you? NUM CRAS AD SCHOLAM IS / ITIS? // NUM ES ITURUS / ESTIS ITURI AD SCHOLAM CRAS? B2 Say in Latin: You want to win this contest don’t you? NONNE HOC CERTAMEN VIS / VULTIS / CUPIS / CUPITIS VINCERE? [SCORE CHECK] TU 6 What state has the motto “ad astra per aspera”? KANSAS B1 What state has the motto “dum spiro, spero”? SOUTH CAROLINA B2 What is the Latin motto of the state of Missouri? SALUS POPULI SUPREMA LEX (ESTO) TU 7 Give the accusative singular for the phrase solum animal.
    [Show full text]
  • ASKO TIMONEN the Historia Augusta
    Criticism of Defense. The Blaming of "Crudelitas" in the "Historia Augusta"* ASKO TIMONEN The Historia Augusta (HA) is the coilection of the biographies of the em­ perors and famous pretenders from Hadrian to Numerian. It constitutes an enigma in that we know neither its a.uthor nor the exact time of pub­ lication. For the purpose of this report, I have adopted the broad dating used by P. Soverini, as such a stance provides a general foundation in terms of the research of the history of mentalities and ideologies. Soverini dates publication of the compilation at about the fourth or the fifth century.1 In this paper the concept of crudelitas - the use of "unnecessary" vio­ lence - shall be discussed with reference to the political situation in a histo­ riographical sense. Of further interest here is the methodology used in the biographical historiography in that the author utilizes imperial propaganda for his own purpose of blaming a ruler, in this case L. Septimius Severus, of being cruel. To illustrate this concept, I shall interpret the author's comments on the autobiography of Septimius Severus as weil as the au­ thor's excerpts which were inspired either by this very autobiography or by Severus' speeches to the senate. The author of the HA was weil acquainted with the now-lost autobiography of Septimius Severus: Uxorem tune Mar­ ciam duxit, de qua tacuit in historia vitae privatae (Sept. Sev. 3.2). Vitam suam privatam publicamque ipse composuit ad fidem, solum tarnen vitium crudelitatis excusans (Sept. Sev. 18.6). In vita sua Severus dicit ..
    [Show full text]
  • Ptolemaic Foundations in Asia Minor and the Aegean As the Lagids’ Political Tool
    ELECTRUM * Vol. 20 (2013): 57–76 doi: 10.4467/20800909EL.13.004.1433 PTOLEMAIC FOUNDATIONS IN ASIA MINOR AND THE AEGEAN AS THE LAGIDS’ POLITICAL TOOL Tomasz Grabowski Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków Abstract: The Ptolemaic colonisation in Asia Minor and the Aegean region was a signifi cant tool which served the politics of the dynasty that actively participated in the fi ght for hegemony over the eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea basin. In order to specify the role which the settlements founded by the Lagids played in their politics, it is of considerable importance to establish as precise dating of the foundations as possible. It seems legitimate to acknowledge that Ptolemy II possessed a well-thought-out plan, which, apart from the purely strategic aspects of founding new settlements, was also heavily charged with the propaganda issues which were connected with the cult of Arsinoe II. Key words: Ptolemies, foundations, Asia Minor, Aegean. Settlement of new cities was a signifi cant tool used by the Hellenistic kings to achieve various goals: political and economic. The process of colonisation was begun by Alex- ander the Great, who settled several cities which were named Alexandrias after him. The process was successfully continued by the diadochs, and subsequently by the follow- ing rulers of the monarchies which emerged after the demise of Alexander’s state. The new settlements were established not only by the representatives of the most powerful dynasties: the Seleucids, the Ptolemies and the Antigonids, but also by the rulers of the smaller states. The kings of Pergamum of the Attalid dynasty were considerably active in this fi eld, but the rulers of Bithynia, Pontus and Cappadocia were also successful in this process.1 Very few regions of the time remained beyond the colonisation activity of the Hellenistic kings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Latin Principality of Antioch and Its Relationship with the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia, 1188-1268 Samuel James Wilson
    The Latin Principality of Antioch and Its Relationship with the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia, 1188-1268 Samuel James Wilson A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Nottingham Trent University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy March 2016 1 Copyright Statement This work is the intellectual property of the author. You may copy up to 5% of this work for private study, or personal, non-commercial research. Any re-use of the information contained within this document should be fully referenced, quoting the author, title, university, degree level and pagination. Queries or requests for any other use, or if a more substantial copy is required, should be directed to the owner of the Intellectual Property Rights. 2 Abstract The Latin principality of Antioch was founded during the First Crusade (1095-1099), and survived for 170 years until its destruction by the Mamluks in 1268. This thesis offers the first full assessment of the thirteenth century principality of Antioch since the publication of Claude Cahen’s La Syrie du nord à l’époque des croisades et la principauté franque d’Antioche in 1940. It examines the Latin principality from its devastation by Saladin in 1188 until the fall of Antioch eighty years later, with a particular focus on its relationship with the Armenian kingdom of Cilicia. This thesis shows how the fate of the two states was closely intertwined for much of this period. The failure of the principality to recover from the major territorial losses it suffered in 1188 can be partly explained by the threat posed by the Cilician Armenians in the late twelfth and early thirteenth centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GEOGRAPHY of GALATIA Gal 1:2; Act 18:23; 1 Cor 16:1
    CHAPTER 38 THE GEOGRAPHY OF GALATIA Gal 1:2; Act 18:23; 1 Cor 16:1 Mark Wilson KEY POINTS • Galatia is both a region and a province in central Asia Minor. • The main cities of north Galatia were settled by the Gauls in the third cen- tury bc. • The main cities of south Galatia were founded by the Greeks starting in the third century bc. • Galatia became a Roman province in 25 bc, and the Romans established colonies in many of its cities. • Pamphylia was part of Galatia in Paul’s day, so Perga and Attalia were cities in south Galatia. GALATIA AS A REGION and their families who migrated from Galatia is located in a basin in north-cen- Thrace in 278 bc. They had been invited tral Asia Minor that is largely flat and by Nicomedes I of Bithynia to serve as treeless. Within it are the headwaters of mercenaries in his army. The Galatians the Sangarius River (mode rn Sakarya) were notorious for their destructive and the middle course of the Halys River forays, and in 241 bc the Pergamenes led (modern Kızılırmak). The capital of the by Attalus I defeated them at the battle Hittite Empire—Hattusha (modern of the Caicus. The statue of the dying Boğazköy)—was in eastern Galatia near Gaul, one of antiquity’s most noted the later site of Tavium. The name Galatia works of art, commemorates that victo- derives from the twenty thousand Gauls ry. 1 The three Galatian tribes settled in 1 . For the motif of dying Gauls, see Brigitte Kahl, Galatians Re-imagined: Reading with the Eyes of the Vanquished (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2010), 77–127.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Missions
    PROCEEDING-S OF THE BOARD OF MISSIONS OF TH E PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, A T T H E IH iFttst gftfronfal Sttnttna, Held in the City o f Philadelphia, on the 6th day of September, A. D. 1838, and continued by adjournments to the 11th of the same month. TOGETHEB WITH THE REPORTS OF TH E DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN COMMITTEES, THE REPORT OF THE BOARD TO THE GENERAL CONVENTION, AND TH E REPORT OF A SPECIAL COMMITTEE, MADE BY THE REV. DR. JARVIS. NEW-YORK: t PRINTED BY WILLIAM OSBORN, 88 William-street. M DCCC XXXVIII. PROCEEDINGS OF T H E BOARD OF MISSIONS. TRIENNIAL MEETING. Philadelphia, September 6, 1838. T h e Triennial Meeting of the Board of Missions of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, was held this day at St. Andrew’s church, at 5 o’clock, P. M. Present: The Rt.Rev. Bishops Moore, Bowen, Chase, Brow­ nell, H. U. Onderdonk, Meade, B. T. Onderdonk, M‘Ilvaine, Doane, and McCoskry;—The Rev. Messrs. Allen, Anthon, Boyd, Burroughs, Carder, Croswell, De Lancey, Dorr, Dunn, Ducachet, Edson, Forbes, Hawks, Jackson, Jarvis, Johns, Jones, Mason, Mead, Milnor, Morehouse, Prestman, Rodney, Tyng, Vaughan, Watson, and the Secretary,—Messrs. Ec- cleston. Huntington, Lovell, Morris, Newton, Nicklin, Stuy- vesant and Wharton. The Rt. Rev. Bishop Moore opened the meeting with prayer. The roll having been called, it was on motion of the Se­ cretary, Resolved, That the reading of the minutes of the last meeting be dispensed with. The Rev. Mr. Vaughan, the Secretary and General Agent of the Foreign Committee, reported that Henry I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Persecution of Christians in the First Century
    JETS 61.3 (2018): 525–47 THE PERSECUTION OF CHRISTIANS IN THE FIRST CENTURY ECKHARD J. SCHNABEL* Abstract: The Book of Acts, Paul’s letters, 1 Peter, Hebrews, and Revelation attest to nu- merous incidents of persecution, which are attested for most provinces of the Roman empire, triggered by a wide variety of causes and connected with a wide variety of charges against the fol- lowers of Jesus. This essay surveys the twenty-seven specific incidents of and general references to persecution of Christians in the NT, with a focus on geographical, chronological, and legal matters. Key words: persecution, mission, hostility, opposition, Jerusalem, Rome, Peter, Paul, Acts, Hebrews, Revelation This essay seeks to survey the evidence in the NT for instances of the perse- cution of Jesus’ earliest followers in their historical and chronological contexts without attempting to provide a comprehensive analysis of each incident. The Greek term diōgmos that several NT authors use, usually translated as “persecu- tion,”1 is defined as “a program or process designed to harass and oppress some- one.”2 The term “persecution” is used here to describe the aggressive harassment and deliberate ill-treatment of the followers of Jesus, ranging from verbal abuse, denunciation before local magistrates, initiating court proceedings to beatings, flog- ging, banishment from a city, execution, and lynch killings. I. PERSECUTION IN JUDEA, SYRIA, AND NABATEA (AD 30–38/40) 1. Persecution in Jerusalem, Judea (I). Priests in Jerusalem, the captain of the tem- ple, and Sadducees arrested the apostles Peter and John who spoke to a crowd of * Eckhard J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Monumental Villa at Palazzi Di Casignana and the Roman Elite in Calabria (Italy) During the Fourth Century AD
    The Monumental Villa at Palazzi di Casignana and the Roman Elite in Calabria (Italy) during the Fourth Century AD. by Maria Gabriella Bruni A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classical Archaeology in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Committee in Charge Professor Christopher H. Hallett, Chair Professor Ronald S. Stroud Professor Anthony W. Bulloch Professor Carlos F. Noreña Fall 2009 The Monumental Villa at Palazzi di Casignana and the Roman Elite in Calabria (Italy) during the Fourth Century AD. Copyright 2009 Maria Gabriella Bruni Dedication To my parents, Ken and my children. i AKNOWLEDGMENTS I am extremely grateful to my advisor Professor Christopher H. Hallett and to the other members of my dissertation committee. Their excellent guidance and encouragement during the major developments of this dissertation, and the whole course of my graduate studies, were crucial and precious. I am also thankful to the Superintendence of the Archaeological Treasures of Reggio Calabria for granting me access to the site of the Villa at Palazzi di Casignana and its archaeological archives. A heartfelt thank you to the Superintendent of Locri Claudio Sabbione and to Eleonora Grillo who have introduced me to the villa and guided me through its marvelous structures. Lastly, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my husband Ken, my sister Sonia, Michael Maldonado, my children, my family and friends. Their love and support were essential during my graduate
    [Show full text]