<<

270 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics

Smith, H.S., 1919. On some phases of control by the biological method. J. Econ. Entomol. 12: 288–292. 12 Solomon, M. 1949. The natural control of populations. Jour. Anim. Ecol. 18:1–35. Sun, C. N., G. P. Georghiou and K. Weiss. 1980. Toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis to larvae variously resistant to conventional insecticides. Mosq. News 40:614-618. Fruit (Diptera: ): Steffan, W. A. and N. L. Evenhuis. 1981. Biology of Toxorhycnhites. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 26: Biology, Host , Natural Enemies, 159-181. Trpis, M. 1972. Development and predatory behavior of Toxorhynchites brevipalpis (Diptera, and the Implications to Their Natural Control Culicidae) in relation to temperature. Environ. Entomol. 1: 537-546. Trpis, M. 1973. Interaction between the predator Toxorhynchites brevipalpis and its prey Aedes M. A. Uchoa aegypti. Bull. Wld. Hlth. Org. 49: 359-365. Laboratório de Insetos Frugívoros, Tully, T. P. Cassey and R. Ferriere. 2005. Functional response: rigorous estimation and Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados sensitivity to genetic variation in prey. Oikos 111: 479-487. Van Dam, A. R., and W. E. Walton. 2008. The effect of predatory fish exudates on the ovipositional behavior of three mosquito : Cules quinquefasciatus, Aedes aegypti and Culex tarsalis. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 22: 399-404. 1. Introduction Vanlerberghe, V., M. E. Toledo, M. Rodriguez, D. Gomez, A. Baly, J. R. Benitez, and P. Van der Stuyft. 2009. Community involvement in dengue vector control: cluster Brazil is the third world largest producer of fruits, surpassed only by China (94.4 millions of randomised trial. British Medical Journal 338: b1959. tons) and India (51.14 million tons) (Vitti, 2009). The fruit growing area in Brazil currently Vanlerberghe, V., E. Villegas, M. Oviedo, A. Baly, A. Lenhart, P. J. McCall, and P. Van der takes up 2.3 millions of hectares, with an annual production superior to 36.8 millions of Stuyft. 2011. Evaluation of the effectiveness of insecticide treated materials for tones. The horticulture generates six millions of direct jobs, totalizing about 27% of total household level dengue vector control. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5: e994. labor force employed in agriculture in the Country, and makes a gross domestic product Various. 1995. Biological Control Benefits and Risks. Cambridge University press. (GDP) of about US$ 11 billion. In the farms of fruit growing, in general, there are a demand Vezzani, D. and A. P. Albicocco. 2009. The effect of shade on the container index and pupal for intensive and qualified labor, creating jobs and ensuring a rural Well-being of the productivity of the mosquitoes Aedes aegypti and Culex pipiens breeding in artificial farmers and their employees, both on small farms as on large farms. However, Brazil containers. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 23: 78–84. occupies the 17th position among world exporters of fruits (Ibraf, 2009; Vitti, 2009). Wandscheer, C. B., J. E. Duque, M. A. N. da Silva, Y. Fukuyama, J. L. Wohlke, J. Adelmann, Part of Brazilian fruit production is lost in the field due the attack by larvae of different and J. D. Fontana. 2004. Larvicidal action of ethanolic extracts from fruit endocarps species of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea). Herein, fruit flies are referred as the guild of all of Melia azedarach and Azadirachta indica against the dengue mosquito Aedes aegypti. specialized species with frugivorous larvae, that in South America, especially in Toxicon 44: 829-835. Brazil, belong to two families: and (Diptera: Tephritoidea) Wang, C. H., N. T. Chang, H. H. Wu, and C. M. Ho. 2000. Integrated control of the dengue (Uchoa & Nicácio, 2010). On the other hand, the fruit flies are interesting of the vector Aedes aegypti in Lui-Chui village, Ping-Tung country, Taiwan. Journal of the scientific point of view, because they have polytene chromosomes like those found in American Mosquito Control Association 16: 93-99. species of (), which are very important for genetics studies. Fruit Williams, F. M. and S. A. Juliano. 1985. Further difficulties in the analysis of functional Flies also can be easily reared in the laboratory to serve as experimental animals for response experiments and a resolution. Can. Entomol. 117: 631-640. research in several areas of the biological and environmental sciences (Uchoa et al., 2004). Watts, R. B. and S. M. Smith. 1978. Oogenesis in Toxorhynchites rutilus (Diptera: Culicidae). Can. J. Zool. 56: 136-139. The fruit flies belong to two families: Tephritidae and Lonchaeidae (Tephritoidea). They World Health Organisation. 2002. Malaria entomology and vector control. Learner's guide. have great economic importance because they are considered the key pests that most WHO/CDS/CPE/SMT/2002.18. adversely affect the production and marketing of fruits and vegetables around the world. World Health Organisation. 2004. Global strategic framework for integrated vector The tephritids are able of inserting the to drop their eggs into the living tissues of management. WHO/CDS/CPE/PVC/2004.10. host plants, such as green fruit, fruit in process of maturation or ripe fruits. If females of World Health Organisation. 2009. Dengue guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, prevention Lonchaeidae lay their eggs inside or over the fruits, flowers, or inside terminal shoots of and control WHO/HTM/NTD/DEN/2009.1. Euphorbiaceae is still unknown. According Lourenção et al. (1996), Neosilba perezi (Romero Wright, J. W., R. F. Fritz, and J. Haworth. 1972. Changing concepts of vector control in & Ruppel) is a key pest in shoots of cassava clones. Both families of fruit flies cause direct malaria eradication. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 17: 75-102. and indirect damages. The direct ones are because their eggs hatch and the larvae eat the underlying flesh of the fruits. The indirect damage is due to depreciation of the fruits in the Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 272 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 273 market retailers; opening holes through which can penetrate pathogenic microorganisms or probably by airplane flights (aircraft) between Indonesia and Suriname (Oliveira et al., 2006). decomposers, or yet, causing the early fall of fruits attacked in the field. Some species of B. carambolae is a species in process of eradication from the Region North of Brazil. fruit flies are also the major bottleneck in the exports of fresh fruits and vegetables between The has 89 described species worldwide, occurring mainly in tropical . nations. This is because the importing countries generally impose stringent quarantine In Brazil occurs only which is distributed in almost all tropical and warm barriers to the producing and exporting Countries where fruit flies do occur, fearing the temperate areas in the world (Virgilio et al., 2008). C. capitata is originally from Africa, with entry exotic species inside the imported products in their territories (Uchoa & Nicácio, 2010; abundant populations in the Mediterranean region which borders with Europe. It has been White & Elson-Harris, 1992). found in Brazil for the first time in 1901, in the state of São Paulo (Uchôa & Zucchi, 1999). Tephritidae is the most species rich family of fruit flies, with around 5,000 described species, The genus , with 70 described species occurs mainly in the Holarctic and in six subfamilies (Tachiniscinae, Blepharoneurinae, Phytalmyiinae, , , Neotropical regions, being reported 21 species in the last one. Rhagoletis species infest mostly and ); about 500 genera, and probably many undescribed species worldwide. fruits of Juglandaceae, Rosaceae, Rutaceae, and Solanaceae. In the Brazilian territory are Tephritids are peculiars because they are among the few groups of dipterans strictly reported three species (Ragoletis adusta Foote, from the state of São Paulo, R. ferruginea phytophagous, except the Tachiniscinae, which are thought be parasitoids of Lepidoptera, R macquarti and at least, some species of Phytalmyiinae that feed on live or dead bamboos (Poaceae) or Hendel, in Bahia, Paraná, and Santa Catarina, and . (Loew), in Goiás, and Minas on trees recently fallen of other families. Blepharoneurinae feed in flowers, fruits, and Gerais (Foote, 1981; Ramírez et al., 2008), but the species of Rhagoletis have not been make galls in Cucurbitaceae; Trypetinae and Dacinae feed in fruits or in seeds of a wide considered as key pests in Brazil. On the other hand, some species in this genus are pest of range of plant families, and Tephritinae eat in flowers, make gall, or are leaf-miners in a fruits in and Chile (Salazar et al., 2002). wide array of plant taxa: Aquifoliaceae, Scrophulariaceae, Verbenaceae, but mainly in Lonchaeidae is the second family of fruit flies with economic importance in South America, flowerheads of Asteraceae (Norrbom, 2010; Uchoa & Nicácio, 2010). where some species of the genera Dasiops and Neosilba are primary pests in crop fruits. The The Lonchaeidae fruit flies have about 500 described species worldwide, in two subfamilies, species of Dasiops attack cultivated or wild species: green or ripe fruits, or floral and nine genera. Dasiopinae is represented only by Dasiops Rondani, and the Lonchaeinae, buds (), depending on the Dasiops species (Norrbom & Mcalpine, 1997; Uchôa et al., 2002; Uchôa & Nicácio, 2010). The Neosilba species are generally polyphagous, with the other eight remaining genera, being Neosilba the most studied and economically attacking many species of fruit, native or exotic, cultivated or wild ones. The Neosilba species important genus in Neotropics, with 20 described species, from which 16 are reported in most commonly involved in the infestation of fruits and vegetables are: N. zadolicha Steyskal Brazil. The genus Dasiops, with about 120 described species worldwide, have few species & McAlpine, N. pendula (Bezzi), N. glaberrima (Wiedemann), and N. inesperata Strikis & reported in Brazil. The lonchaeids eat in flowers or fruits from different plant taxa (e. g. Prado. These four Neosilba species, plus N. perezi, are considered of greatest economic Asteraceae) or feed on organic matter, especially decaying plants (Macgowan & Freidberg, importance in South America because of their damage in crop fruits, vegetables, or in 2008; Uchoa & Nicácio, 2010). cassava plantations (Lourenção et al., 1996; Nicácio & Uchôa, 2011). The fruit species economically important in Brazil belong to six genera: From the species of fruit flies pests that occurs in Central and South America, Anastrepha Schiner, Macquart, Ceratitis McLeay, Rhagoletis (Loew) (Tephritidae), Dasiops obliqua (Macquart), Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann), and Ceratitis capitata, are the most Rondani, and Neosilba McAlpine (Lonchaeidae). The genera Bactrocera and Ceratitis in Brazil polyphagous and with greater distribution in Brazil (Uchôa & Nicácio, 2010), are represented by only one species each: B. carambolae Drew & Hancock, and the Guillén & Sánchez (2007), , Ovruski et al. (2009), , Canal (2010), , Mediterranean-Fruit fly, C. capitata (Wiedemann), both introduced in Brazil (Nicácio Katiyar et al. (2000), and Peru, Harris & Olalquaiga (1991). Similar pattern is reported in & Uchoa, 2011). The species of Rhagoletis have some economic importance in South of Brazil. Central America (Reyes et al., 2007), where also occurs. Consequently, that that three first species are the most often involved in the colonization of fruits and 2. Fruit flies species with economic importance in South America vegetables sold in the market retailers. The status of these three species as pests of The genus Anastrepha is originally from the Neotropical Region, with a total of 252 horticulture is motivated by three main factors: the existence of several host species, their species described worldwide to date, being 112 recorded in Brazil (Nicácio & Uchoa, 2011; wide distribution in the Neotropics (from to Argentina), and the direct damage that Norrbom & Uchoa, 2011), where about 14 species of Anastrepha (Tab. 1), along with they can cause to fruits and vegetables (Uchôa & Nicácio, 2010). Populations of the Mexican Bactrecera carambolae, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Tephritidae), and some species of fruit fly Anastrepha ludens occurs in North America: Mexico and USA (Florida); in Central Dasiops and Neosilba (Lonchaeidae) are the main species of fruit flies with actual or America: Belize, , El Salvador, , Honduras and , but it is not potential economic importance to the Brazilian crop fruits or vegetables (Nicácio & Uchoa, recorded in South America (Oliveira et al., 2006). 2011). 3. Why the control of the fruit flies is so difficult? Bactrecera carambolae is native to the Indo-Australian region. It attacks at least 26 species of host fruits worldwide, most of them of commercial interest (e.g., Star Fruit, mango, sapodilla, The control of fruit flies (including lance flies) in the South American orchards is still done cherry, guava, jabuticaba, rose apple, jackfruit, breadfruit, orange, tangerine, tomato, etc.). mainly through of spray chemical . However, worldwide, the widespread use of It was introduced in Northern Brazil (Oiapoque, Amapá) in 1996 from French Guiana, carried Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 272 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 273 market retailers; opening holes through which can penetrate pathogenic microorganisms or probably by airplane flights (aircraft) between Indonesia and Suriname (Oliveira et al., 2006). decomposers, or yet, causing the early fall of fruits attacked in the field. Some species of B. carambolae is a species in process of eradication from the Region North of Brazil. fruit flies are also the major bottleneck in the exports of fresh fruits and vegetables between The genus Ceratitis has 89 described species worldwide, occurring mainly in tropical Africa. nations. This is because the importing countries generally impose stringent quarantine In Brazil occurs only Ceratitis capitata which is distributed in almost all tropical and warm barriers to the producing and exporting Countries where fruit flies do occur, fearing the temperate areas in the world (Virgilio et al., 2008). C. capitata is originally from Africa, with entry exotic species inside the imported products in their territories (Uchôa & Nicácio, 2010; abundant populations in the Mediterranean region which borders with Europe. It has been White & Elson-Harris, 1992). found in Brazil for the first time in 1901, in the state of São Paulo (Uchôa & Zucchi, 1999). Tephritidae is the most species rich family of fruit flies, with around 5,000 described species, The genus Rhagoletis, with 70 described species occurs mainly in the Holarctic and in six subfamilies (Tachiniscinae, Blepharoneurinae, Phytalmyiinae, Trypetinae, Dacinae, Neotropical regions, being reported 21 species in the last one. Rhagoletis species infest mostly and Tephritinae); about 500 genera, and probably many undescribed species worldwide. fruits of Juglandaceae, Rosaceae, Rutaceae, and Solanaceae. In the Brazilian territory are Tephritids are peculiars because they are among the few groups of dipterans strictly reported three species (Ragoletis adusta Foote, from the state of São Paulo, R. ferruginea phytophagous, except the Tachiniscinae, which are thought be parasitoids of Lepidoptera, Hendel, in Bahia, Paraná, and Santa Catarina, and R. macquarti (Loew), in Goiás, and Minas and at least, some species of Phytalmyiinae that feed on live or dead bamboos (Poaceae) or Gerais (Foote, 1981; Ramírez et al., 2008), but the species of Rhagoletis have not been on trees recently fallen of other plant families. Blepharoneurinae feed in flowers, fruits, and make galls in Cucurbitaceae; Trypetinae and Dacinae feed in fruits or in seeds of a wide considered as key pests in Brazil. On the other hand, some species in this genus are pest of range of plant families, and Tephritinae eat in flowers, make gall, or are leaf-miners in a fruits in Peru and Chile (Salazar et al., 2002). wide array of plant taxa: Aquifoliaceae, Scrophulariaceae, Verbenaceae, but mainly in Lonchaeidae is the second family of fruit flies with economic importance in South America, flowerheads of Asteraceae (Norrbom, 2010; Uchôa & Nicácio, 2010). where some species of the genera Dasiops and Neosilba are primary pests in crop fruits. The species of Dasiops attack cultivated or wild passion fruit species: green or ripe fruits, or The Lonchaeidae fruit flies have about 500 described species worldwide, in two subfamilies, floral buds (Passifloraceae), depending on the Dasiops species (Norrbom & Mcalpine, 1997; and nine genera. Dasiopinae is represented only by Dasiops Rondani, and the Lonchaeinae, et al., 2002; & Nicácio, 2010). The Neosilba species are generally with the other eight remaining genera, being Neosilba the most studied and economically Uchoa Uchoa polyphagous, attacking many species of fruit, native or exotic, cultivated or wild ones. The important genus in Neotropics, with 20 described species, from which 16 are reported in Neosilba species most commonly involved in the infestation of fruits and vegetables are: N. Brazil. The genus Dasiops, with about 120 described species worldwide, have few species zadolicha Steyskal & McAlpine, N. pendula (Bezzi), N. glaberrima (Wiedemann), and N. reported in Brazil. The lonchaeids eat in flowers or fruits from different plant taxa (e. g. inesperata Strikis & Prado. These four Neosilba species, plus N. perezi, are considered Asteraceae) or feed on organic matter, especially decaying plants (Macgowan & Freidberg, of greatest economic importance in South America because of their damage in crop 2008; Uchôa & Nicácio, 2010). fruits, vegetables, or in cassava plantations (Lourenção et al., 1996; Nicácio & Uchoa, 2011). The fruit fly species economically important in Brazil belong to six genera: Anastrepha From the species of fruit flies pests that occurs in Central and South America, Schiner, Bactrocera Macquart, Ceratitis McLeay, Rhagoletis (Loew) (Tephritidae), Dasiops (Macquart), Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann), and Ceratitis capitata, Rondani, and Neosilba McAlpine (Lonchaeidae). The genera Bactrocera and Ceratitis in Brazil are the most polyphagous and with greater distribution in Brazil (Uchoa & Nicácio, are represented by only one species each: B. carambolae Drew & Hancock, and the 2010), Argentina Guillén & Sánchez (2007), Bolivia, Ovruski et al. (2009), Colombia, Canal Mediterranean-Fruit fly, C. capitata (Wiedemann), both introduced in Brazil (Nicácio & (2010), Venezuela, Katiyar et al. (2000), and Peru, Harris & Olalquaiga (1991). Similar Uchôa, 2011). The species of Rhagoletis have some economic importance in South of Brazil. pattern is reported in Central America (Reyes et al., 2007), where Anastrepha ludens also occurs. Consequently, that that three first species are the most often involved in the 2. Fruit flies species with economic importance in South America colonization of fruits and vegetables sold in the market retailers. The status of The genus Anastrepha is originally from the Neotropical Region, with a total of 252 species these three species as pests of horticulture is motivated by three main factors: the described worldwide to date, being 112 recorded in Brazil (Nicácio & Uchôa, 2011; Norrbom existence of several host species, their wide distribution in the Neotropics (from Mexico to & Uchôa, 2011), where about 14 species of Anastrepha (Tab. 1), along with Bactrecera Argentina), and the direct damage that they can cause to fruits and vegetables (Uchoa & carambolae, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Tephritidae), and some species of Dasiops and Nicácio, 2010). Populations of the Mexican fruit fly Anastrepha ludens occurs in North Neosilba (Lonchaeidae) are the main species of fruit flies with actual or potential economic America: Mexico and USA (Florida); in Central America: Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, importance to the Brazilian crop fruits or vegetables (Nicácio & Uchôa, 2011). Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua, but it is not recorded in South America (Oliveira et al., 2006). Bactrecera carambolae is native to the Indo-Australian region. It attacks at least 26 species of host fruits worldwide, most of them of commercial interest (e.g., Star Fruit, mango, sapodilla, 3. Why the control of the fruit flies is so difficult? cherry, guava, jabuticaba, rose apple, jackfruit, breadfruit, orange, tangerine, tomato, etc.). It was introduced in Northern Brazil (Oiapoque, Amapá) in 1996 from French Guiana, carried The control of fruit flies (including lance flies) in the South American orchards is still done mainly through of spray chemical pesticide. However, worldwide, the widespread use of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 274 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 275 chemical to protect agricultural products against and other pests is of increasing concern (Cancino et al., 2009), especially because of consequent environmental pollutants, and human food contamination by pesticides residues with disastrous consequences on our health and environments. The adult female of the tephritid fruit flies (e.g. Anastrepha spp., Bactrocera spp., Rhagoletis spp., and Ceratitis capitata) are able to lay their eggs inside the fruit tissue, pouncing the skin and fruit pulp with their aculeus (ovipositor). After oviposition the wounds over the fruit surface become healed, and the eggs can mature and hatch inside the fruit tissue. The newly emerged larvae are now sheltered from the external environment, making difficult any effort with pesticides to control them.

4. Life history of Anastrepha species (Trypetinae: Tephritidae) The complete life cycle of Anastrepha fraterculus in the field is still unknown, but under laboratory conditions (25oC, and 70-80% RH), the life cycle from egg to the first female oviposition, occurred in about 80 days. The adult longevity in that condition was 161 days to both males and females. The eggs hatch in about 3 days, larvae is completed around 13 days, pupae emerged in about 14 days, and the female gained sexual maturation and started Fig. 1. Ethogram of the typical sequence of the mating behavior of Anastrepha sororcula: (A) Male signaling to the female with wing vibration, abdominal tip distension, and protrusion oviposition after 7 days from emergence (Salles, 2000). Differently from other phytophagous of their anal pouch; (B) the female attracted to the male approaches, and goes running to groups of Diptera, the adult females of several Anastrepha species need to feed on that chosen one, making alternating movements of rotation with their wings; (C) the male proteinaceous materials to maturing their eggs. fly forward to mount the female, trying the copulation, or sometimes, he rises by the head of In nature or in laboratory, when the third-instar larvae of Anastrepha spp. are fully mature, the female trying the copulation; (D) male with hind legs, raises the ovipositor of the female they fall off from the fruit and dig in the soil to pupation, that occurs at depths between to connect their genitals for coupling; (E) regularly the male vibrates their body over the female's body; (F) the male goes down from female dorsum and both walk with their heads 2 and 5 cm (Hodgson et al. 1998). Nicácio & Uchoa (2011) found that depending on diametrically opposed for the separation of their genitals, and (G) after decoupling, both o the climatic conditions (between 15-30 C, and 60-90% RH) the emergence is faster. Under start rubbing hind legs on their terminalia (Facholi & Uchôa, 2006). this condition, the adults can emerge, depending on the species, between 14 and 22 days after they have buried themselves in the soil to pupation. The longest fase on life cycle of Anastrepha species is, probably, adult. For some studied species (e. g. A. fraterculus and A. sororcula) in laboratory conditions (around 25-27 oC, 60- The sexual behavior of Anastrepha sororcula Zucchi was studied in laboratory. This species is 80% RH) they are able to live for about 180 days. Probably this trait enables the survival a key pest of guava (Psidium guajava L.) in Brazil. The age of sexual maturation to the males some species of Anastrepha in natural environment, enabling them to wait for the adequate of A. sororcula in laboratory was completed between 7 and 18 days, at an average, 12 days stage of development of their host fruit in nature. after emergence. The males exhibited signaling behavior to the females, characterized by the distension of the pleural area of the abdomen, forming a small pouch on each side, and by 5. Host plants to fruit flies pests in South America the protrusion of a tiny membranous pouch of rectal cuticle that surrounds the anal area. During this display, the males produced rapid movements of wing vibrations, producing an Although Anastrepha is the most biodiverse genus of Neotropical fruit flies, only 14 species are polyphagous, they are with a wide distribution in South America, and able to attack audible sound. A droplet was liberated from the anal area during wing vibration grown fruit and/or vegetables of commercial value. Anastrepha pickeli Lima has been movements. After attracting the females, the males accomplished a series of elaborated recorded as polyphagous, because it is reported breeding in two species of different families movements of courtship behavior (Fig. 1). On the other hand, females became sexually (Uchôa et al., 2002; Zucchi, 2008). But, taking in account that the fruits of Manihot esculenta mature between 14 and 24 days, on average, at 19 days after emergence. The daily exhibition Crantz (Euphorbiaceae), and that of Quararibea turbinata (Swartz) (Bombacaceae), are not of sexual activities was confined almost exclusively to the period from 16:00 to 17:30h. A. edible, A. pickeli is not considered a key pest (Tab. 1). sororcula presented a sharp protandry pattern (Facholi & Uchoa, 2006). These asynchronous Ceratitis capitata is cosmopolitan, one of the most important key pest of fruit and vegetable developments between males and females of fruit flies may play an important evolutionary crops worldwide, and certainly, the most widespread species of frugivorous tephritid role. If males and females of the same progeny (offspring) reach sexual maturity at different around the world. This species feeds in more than 400 fruit species from 75 plant families. In times in nature, the chance of inbred mating decreases, which increases the Brazil, C. capitata is recorded in 60 species of host fruits from 22 families, of which 22 are genetic variability of the species (Nicácio & Uchoa, 2011). native (Uchôa et al., 2002; Uchôa & Nicácio, 2010) (Tab. 1). Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 274 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 275 chemical pesticides to protect agricultural products against insects and other arthropod pests is of increasing concern (Cancino et al., 2009), especially because of consequent environmental pollutants, and human food contamination by pesticides residues with disastrous consequences on our health and environments. The adult female of the tephritid fruit flies (e.g. Anastrepha spp., Bactrocera spp., Rhagoletis spp., and Ceratitis capitata) are able to lay their eggs inside the fruit tissue, pouncing the skin and fruit pulp with their aculeus (ovipositor). After oviposition the wounds over the fruit surface become healed, and the eggs can mature and hatch inside the fruit tissue. The newly emerged larvae are now sheltered from the external environment, making difficult any effort with pesticides to control them.

4. Life history of Anastrepha species (Trypetinae: Tephritidae) The complete life cycle of Anastrepha fraterculus in the field is still unknown, but under laboratory conditions (25oC, and 70-80% RH), the life cycle from egg to the first female oviposition, occurred in about 80 days. The adult longevity in that condition was 161 days to both males and females. The eggs hatch in about 3 days, larvae is completed around 13 days, pupae emerged in about 14 days, and the female gained sexual maturation and started Fig. 1. Ethogram of the typical sequence of the mating behavior of Anastrepha sororcula: (A) Male signaling to the female with wing vibration, abdominal tip distension, and protrusion oviposition after 7 days from emergence (Salles, 2000). Differently from other phytophagous of their anal pouch; (B) the female attracted to the male approaches, and goes running to groups of Diptera, the adult females of several Anastrepha species need to feed on that chosen one, making alternating movements of rotation with their wings; (C) the male proteinaceous materials to maturing their eggs. fly forward to mount the female, trying the copulation, or sometimes, he rises by the head of In nature or in laboratory, when the third-instar larvae of Anastrepha spp. are fully mature, the female trying the copulation; (D) male with hind legs, raises the ovipositor of the female they fall off from the fruit and dig in the soil to pupation, that occurs at depths between 2 to connect their genitals for coupling; (E) regularly the male vibrates their body over the female's body; (F) the male goes down from female dorsum and both walk with their heads and 5 cm (Hodgson et al. 1998). Nicácio & Uchôa (2011) found that depending on the diametrically opposed for the separation of their genitals, and (G) after decoupling, both climatic conditions (between 15-30oC, and 60-90% RH) the emergence is faster. Under this start rubbing hind legs on their terminalia (Facholi & Uchoa, 2006). condition, the adults can emerge, depending on the species, between 14 and 22 days after they have buried themselves in the soil to pupation. The longest fase on life cycle of Anastrepha species is, probably, adult. For some studied species (e. g. A. fraterculus and A. sororcula) in laboratory conditions (around 25-27 oC, 60- The sexual behavior of Anastrepha sororcula Zucchi was studied in laboratory. This species is 80% RH) they are able to live for about 180 days. Probably this trait enables the survival a key pest of guava (Psidium guajava L.) in Brazil. The age of sexual maturation to the males some species of Anastrepha in natural environment, enabling them to wait for the adequate of A. sororcula in laboratory was completed between 7 and 18 days, at an average, 12 days stage of development of their host fruit in nature. after emergence. The males exhibited signaling behavior to the females, characterized by the distension of the pleural area of the abdomen, forming a small pouch on each side, and by 5. Host plants to fruit flies pests in South America the protrusion of a tiny membranous pouch of rectal cuticle that surrounds the anal area. During this display, the males produced rapid movements of wing vibrations, producing an Although Anastrepha is the most biodiverse genus of Neotropical fruit flies, only 14 species are polyphagous, they are with a wide distribution in South America, and able to attack audible sound. A droplet was liberated from the anal area during wing vibration grown fruit and/or vegetables of commercial value. Anastrepha pickeli Lima has been movements. After attracting the females, the males accomplished a series of elaborated recorded as polyphagous, because it is reported breeding in two species of different movements of courtship behavior (Fig. 1). On the other hand, females became sexually families (Uchoa et al., 2002; Zucchi, 2008). But, taking in account that the fruits of Manihot mature between 14 and 24 days, on average, at 19 days after emergence. The daily exhibition esculenta Crantz (Euphorbiaceae), and that of Quararibea turbinata (Swartz) of sexual activities was confined almost exclusively to the period from 16:00 to 17:30h. A. (Bombacaceae), are not edible, A. pickeli is not considered a key pest (Tab. 1). sororcula presented a sharp protandry pattern (Facholi & Uchôa, 2006). These asynchronous Ceratitis capitata is cosmopolitan, one of the most important key pest of fruit and vegetable developments between males and females of fruit flies may play an important evolutionary crops worldwide, and certainly, the most widespread species of frugivorous tephritid role. If males and females of the same progeny (offspring) reach sexual maturity at different around the world. This species feeds in more than 400 fruit species from 75 plant families. In times in nature, the chance of inbred mating decreases, which increases the genetic Brazil, C. capitata is recorded in 60 species of host fruits from 22 families, of which 22 variability of the species (Nicácio & Uchôa, 2011). are native (Uchoa et al., 2002; Uchoa & Nicácio, 2010) (Tab. 1). Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 276 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 277

Species Host Fruits Plant Family Distribution References Species Host Fruits Plant Family DistributionReferences *Anastrepha Spondias cf. macrocarpa Brazil Uramoto et al., **A. obliqua humile St.Hil. Anacardiaceae Argentina Zucchi, 2008 antunesi Lima Engl. Myrtaceae Peru 2008 (Macquart) Anacardium othonianum Myrtaceae Brazil Uchôa & Eugenia stipitata McVaugh Anacardiaceae Venezuela Zucchi, 2008 Rizzini + 5 Plant families Bolivia Nicácio, 2010 Psidium guajava L. White & Elson- Spondias cytherea Sonn. in Zucchi (2008) Colombia Silva et al., 2010 Spondias purpurea L. Harris, 1994 Psidium kennedianum Castañeda et *A. bahiensis Lima Psidium guajava L. Myrtaceae Brazil Zucchi, 2008 + 37 Host fruits in Zucchi Paraguay al., 2010 (2008) Myrciaria cauliflora (Mart.) Moraceae Colombia White & Elson- Peru Katiyar et al., Venezuela 2000 Brosimum potabile Ducke Annonaceae Brazil Harris, 1994 Helicostylis tomentosa (Poep. Ulmaceae Uramoto et al., **A. Mangifera indica L. Anacardiaceae Argentina Zucchi, 2008 et Endl.) 2008 pseudoparallela Psidium guajava Myrtaceae Brazil White & Elson- Rollinia aff. sericea (Fries) Costa et al., (Loew) alata Curtis Passifloraceae Ecuador Harris, 1994 Ampelocera edentula Kuhlm. 2009 Sims. Peru *A. bistrigata Pouteria gardneriana (D.C.) Sapotaceae Brazil Zucchi, 2008 Passiflora quadrangularis Bezzi Psidium australe Cambess. Myrtaceae **A. serpentina Spondias purpurea L. Anacardiaceae Argentina Zucchi, 2008 Psidium guajava L. (Wiedemann) Mammea americana L. Clusiaceae Brazil White & Elson- **A. fraterculus Rollinia laurifolia Schltdl. Annonaceae Brazil Uramoto et al., Salacia campestris Walp. Hippocrateaceae Colombia Harris, 1994 (Wiedemann) Myrcianthes pungens Myrtaceae Argentina 2008 Alibertia sp. Rubiaceae Ecuador Uramoto et al., (Berg.) +18 Plant Families Bolivia Ovruski et al., Coffea canephora L. Moraceae Guyana 2008 Psidium guajava L. in Zucchi (2008) Colombia 2003 Ficus gomelleira Kunth & Sapotaceae Peru Silva et al., 2010 P. kenedianum Morong Ecuador White & Elson- Bouché Suriname Uchôa & Syzygium jambos (L.) Guyana Harris, 1994 Achras sapota L. Venezuel Nicácio, 2010 + 81 Host fruits in Zucchi Paraguay Zucchi, 2008 Chrysophyllum cainito L. (2008) Peru Uchoa & Cotia sp. Manikara spp. Suriname Nicácio, 2010 Pouteria spp. Uruguay Castañeda et Pouteria torta Venezuela al., 2010 Pouteria ramiflora **A. grandis Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Cucurbitaceae Argentina White & (Martius) (Mcquart) Cucumis sativus L. Bolivia Elson-Harris, Mimusops coriacea (A. DC.) Cucurbita maxima Brazil 1994 Uchoa., Mimusopsis commersonii Uchôa, M. A. – Duchesne Colombia 2002 (G. Don.) unpubl. Cucurbita moschata Ecuador Zucchi, 2008 Duchesne Paraguay Castañeda et **A. sororcula Spondias purpurea L. Anacardiaceae Brazil Zucchi, 2008 Cucurbita pepo L. Peru al., 2010 Zucchi Licania tomentosa Fritsch Chrysobalanaceae Colombia Uchôa et al., Venezuela Terminalia catappa L. Combretaceae Ecuador 2002 *A. leptozona Anacardium Anacardiaceae Bolivia White & Elson- Casearia sylvestris Swartz Fabaceae Paraguay Uchôa & Hendel occidentale L. Rubiaceae Brazil Harris, 1994 Byrsonima orbignyana Flacourtiaceae Nicácio, 2010 Alibertia sp. Sapotaceae Guyana Zucchi, 2008 A.Jussieu Oxalidaceae Castañeda et Pouteria torta (Martius) Venezuela Uchoa & Mouriri elliptica Martius Malpighiaceae al., 2010 Pouteria cainito Radlk. Nicácio, 2010 Psidium cattleianum Sabine Melastomataceae Silva et al., 2010 Psidium kennedyanum Myrtaceae *A. macrura Ficus organensis (Miq.) Moraceae Argentina White & Elson- Morong Olacaceae Hendel Schoepfia sp. Olacaceae Brazil Harris, 1994 Schoepfia sp. Oxalidaceae Pouteria lactescens (Vell.) Sapotaceae Ecuador Norrbom, 1998 Physalis angulata L. Rosaceae Paraguay Uchoa & + 21 Host Fruits in Zucchi Rubiaceae Peru Nicácio, 2010 (2008) Solanaceae Venezuela Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 276 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 277

Species Host Fruits Plant Family DistributionReferences Species Host Fruits Plant Family Distribution References *Anastrepha Spondias cf. macrocarpa Anacardiaceae Brazil Uramoto et al., **A. obliqua Anacardium humile St.Hil. Anacardiaceae Argentina Zucchi, 2008 antunesi Lima Engl. Myrtaceae Peru 2008 (Macquart) Anacardium othonianum Myrtaceae Brazil Uchoa & Eugenia stipitata McVaugh Anacardiaceae Venezuela Zucchi, 2008 Rizzini + 5 Plant families Bolivia Nicácio, 2010 Psidium guajava L. White & Elson- Spondias cytherea Sonn. in Zucchi (2008) Colombia Silva et al., Spondias purpurea L. Harris, 1994 Psidium kennedianum Ecuador 2010 Castañeda *A. bahiensis Lima Psidium guajava L. Myrtaceae Brazil Zucchi, 2008 + 37 Host fruits in Zucchi Paraguay et al., 2010 (2008) Myrciaria cauliflora (Mart.) Moraceae Colombia White & Elson- Peru Katiyar et al., Venezuela 2000 Brosimum potabile Ducke Annonaceae Brazil Harris, 1994 Helicostylis tomentosa (Poep. Ulmaceae Uramoto et al., **A. Mangifera indica L. Anacardiaceae Argentina Zucchi, 2008 et Endl.) 2008 pseudoparallela Psidium guajava Myrtaceae Brazil White & Elson- Rollinia aff. sericea (Fries) Costa et al., (Loew) Curtis Passifloraceae Ecuador Harris, 1994 Ampelocera edentula Kuhlm. 2009 Passiflora edulis Sims. Peru *A. bistrigata Pouteria gardneriana (D.C.) Sapotaceae Brazil Zucchi, 2008 Passiflora quadrangularis Bezzi Psidium australe Cambess. Myrtaceae **A. serpentina Spondias purpurea L. Anacardiaceae Argentina Zucchi, 2008 Psidium guajava L. (Wiedemann) Mammea americana L. Clusiaceae Brazil White & Elson- **A. fraterculus Rollinia laurifolia Schltdl. Annonaceae Brazil Uramoto et al., Salacia campestris Walp. Hippocrateaceae Colombia Harris, 1994 (Wiedemann) Myrcianthes pungens Myrtaceae Argentina 2008 Alibertia sp. Rubiaceae Ecuador Uramoto et al., (Berg.) +18 Plant Families Bolivia Ovruski et al., Coffea canephora L. Moraceae Guyana 2008 Psidium guajava L. in Zucchi (2008) Colombia 2003 Ficus gomelleira Kunth & Sapotaceae Peru Silva et al., P. kenedianum Morong Ecuador White & Elson- Bouché Suriname 2010 Uchoa & Syzygium jambos (L.) Guyana Harris, 1994 Achras sapota L. Venezuel Nicácio, 2010 + 81 Host fruits in Zucchi Paraguay Zucchi, 2008 Chrysophyllum cainito L. (2008) Peru Uchôa & Cotia sp. Manikara spp. Suriname Nicácio, 2010 Pouteria spp. Uruguay Castañeda et Pouteria torta Venezuela al., 2010 Pouteria ramiflora **A. grandis Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Cucurbitaceae Argentina White & Elson- (Martius) (Mcquart) Cucumis sativus L. Bolivia Harris, 1994 Mimusops coriacea (A. DC.) Cucurbita maxima Brazil Uchôa et al., Mimusopsis commersonii Uchoa, M. A. – Duchesne Colombia 2002 (G. Don.) unpubl. Cucurbita moschata Ecuador Zucchi, 2008 Duchesne Paraguay Castañeda et **A. sororcula Spondias purpurea L. Anacardiaceae Brazil Zucchi, 2008 Cucurbita pepo L. Peru al., 2010 Zucchi Licania tomentosa Fritsch Chrysobalanaceae Colombia Uchoa et al., Venezuela Terminalia catappa L. Combretaceae Ecuador 2002 *A. leptozona Anacardium Anacardiaceae Bolivia White & Elson- Casearia sylvestris Swartz Fabaceae Paraguay Uchoa & Hendel occidentale L. Rubiaceae Brazil Harris, 1994 Byrsonima orbignyana Flacourtiaceae Nicácio, 2010 Alibertia sp. Sapotaceae Guyana Zucchi, 2008 A.Jussieu Oxalidaceae Castañeda et Pouteria torta (Martius) Venezuela Uchôa & Mouriri elliptica Martius Malpighiaceae al., 2010 Pouteria cainito Radlk. Nicácio, 2010 Psidium cattleianum Sabine Melastomataceae Silva et al., 2010 Psidium kennedyanum Myrtaceae *A. macrura Ficus organensis (Miq.) Moraceae Argentina White & Elson- Morong Olacaceae Hendel Schoepfia sp. Olacaceae Brazil Harris, 1994 Schoepfia sp. Oxalidaceae Pouteria lactescens (Vell.) Sapotaceae Ecuador Norrbom, 1998 Physalis angulata L. Rosaceae Paraguay Uchôa & + 21 Host Fruits in Zucchi Rubiaceae Peru Nicácio, 2010 (2008) Solanaceae Venezuela Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 278 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 279

Species Host Fruits Plant Family Distribution References Species Host Fruits Plant Family DistributionReferences **A. striata Spondias mombin L. Anacardiaceae Bolivia White & **Bactrocera Benincasa hispida (Thunb.) Cucurbitaceae Brazil Oliveira et al., Schiner Spondias purpurea L. Annonaceae Brazil Elson-Harris, carambolae Drew Cucumis sativus L. Myrtaceae Guyana 2006 Rolinia mucosa Jacq. Araceae Colombia 1994 Uchoa et & Hancock Cucurbita pepo L. Rosaceae Suriname Attalea excelsa Martius Chrysobalanaceae Ecuador al., 2002 Lagenaria siceraria (Molina)Rutaceae Chrysobalanacus icaco Lauraceae Guyana Zucchi, 2008 Luffa acutangula (L.) Sapotaceae Persea americana L. Malpighiaceae Peru Uchoa & Luffa aegyptiaca (Mill.) Solanaceae Byrsonima crassifolia L. Moraceae Suriname Nicácio, 2010 Momordica charantia L. Rich. Myrtaceae Venezuela Trichosanthes cucumerina L. Artocarpus heterophyllus Rutaceae Psidium guajava Lam. Passifloraceae Syzygium samarangense Campomanesia Sapotaceae (Blume) cambessedeana Prunus persica (L.) O. Berg. Citrus aurantium L. Eugenia stipitata Citrus maxima Merr. McVaugh Manilkara zapota (L.) Psidium acutangulum DC Capsicum annuum L. Psidium australe Lycopersicon esculentum Cambess. Mill. Psidium guajava L. **Ceratitis capitata Grisebach Juglandaceae Argentina Ovruski et al., Psidium guineense SW (Wiedemann) Hancornia speciosa Gomez Apocynaceae Brazil 2003 Citrus sinensis L. Licania tomentosa Chrysobalanaceae Bolivia White & Elson- Passiflora edulis Terminalia catappa Pouteria cainito L. Combretaceae Chile Harris, 1994 Mouriri elliptica Melastomataceae Colombia Uchôa et al., **A. turpiniae Andira cuyabensis Benthan Fabaceae Brazil Uchoa & Inga laurina Mimosaceae Ecuador 2002 Stone Andira humilis Martius Myrtaceae Nicácio, 2010 Syzygium jambos Myrtaceae Paraguay Uchôa & Psidium kennedyanum Caricacea Uchoa et al., Chrysophyllum gonocarpum Sapotaceae Peru Nicácio, 2010 Psidium guajava Combretaceae 2002 Engler Psidium guineense Anacardiaceae Zucchi, 2008 + 68 Plant families Uruguay Pouteria ramiflora Eugenia dodoneifolia Rosaceae worldwide (Uchôa Venezuela > 400 Host species Cambess. Rutaceae & Nicácio 2010) Syzygium jambos L. worldwide (Uchôa & Jacaratia heptaphylla (Vell.) Nicácio 2010) Terminalia catappa L. Table 1. Species of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea: Tephritidae) with *potential or **real Mangifera indica L. economic importance in South America. Spondias purpurea L. Prunus persicae L. Herein are considered species with **real economical importance those that have been Citrus sinensis historically reared from cultivated fruit species with economic value and, with *potential **A. zenildae Licania tomentosa Chrysobalanaceae Brazil Uchoa & economical importance those that the adults are polyphagous and were reared from some Zucchi Terminalia catappa Combretaceae Nicácio, 2010 genera of fruit trees in which occur species of fruit with commercial value. Andira cuyabensis Fabaceae Uchoa et al., The knowledge of trophic interactions between frugivorous Tephritoidea and their host Banara arguta Briquel Flacourtiaceae 2002 plants is absolutely necessary to guide strategies for integrated management of fruit fly Mouriri elleptica Melastomataceae Zucchi, 2008 pests (polyphagous or oligophagous), and for the conservation of stenophagous and Sorocea sprucei saxicola Moraceae monophagous species in their natural environments. Currently in Brazil, from the total of (Hassler) + 6 Plant Families 112 species of Anastrepha reported in our territory, are known the host plants for only 61 + 20 Host fruits in Zucchi (2008) species (54.46%), being unknown where 51 Anastrepha species (45.54%) are breeding neither in Zucchi (2008) whom are their natural enemies (Nicácio & Uchôa, 2011). Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 278 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 279

Species Host Fruits Plant Family DistributionReferences Species Host Fruits Plant Family Distribution References **A. striata Spondias mombin L. Anacardiaceae Bolivia White & Elson- **Bactrocera Benincasa hispida (Thunb.) Cucurbitaceae Brazil Oliveira et al., Schiner Spondias purpurea L. Annonaceae Brazil Harris, 1994 carambolae Drew Cucumis sativus L. Myrtaceae Guyana 2006 Rolinia mucosa Jacq. Araceae Colombia Uchôa et al., & Hancock Cucurbita pepo L. Rosaceae Suriname Attalea excelsa Martius Chrysobalanaceae Ecuador 2002 Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Rutaceae Chrysobalanacus icaco Lauraceae Guyana Zucchi, 2008 Luffa acutangula (L.) Sapotaceae Persea americana L. Malpighiaceae Peru Uchôa & Luffa aegyptiaca (Mill.) Solanaceae Byrsonima crassifolia L. Moraceae Suriname Nicácio, 2010 Momordica charantia L. Rich. Myrtaceae Venezuela Trichosanthes cucumerina L. Artocarpus heterophyllus Rutaceae Psidium guajava Lam. Passifloraceae Syzygium samarangense Campomanesia Sapotaceae (Blume) cambessedeana Prunus persica (L.) O. Berg. Citrus aurantium L. Eugenia stipitata Citrus maxima Merr. McVaugh Manilkara zapota (L.) Psidium acutangulum DC Capsicum annuum L. Psidium australe Lycopersicon esculentum Cambess. Mill. Psidium guajava L. **Ceratitis capitata Juglans australis Grisebach Juglandaceae Argentina Ovruski et al., Psidium guineense SW (Wiedemann) Hancornia speciosa Gomez Apocynaceae Brazil 2003 Citrus sinensis L. Licania tomentosa Chrysobalanaceae Bolivia White & Elson- Passiflora edulis Terminalia catappa Pouteria cainito L. Combretaceae Chile Harris, 1994 Mouriri elliptica Melastomataceae Colombia Uchoa et al., **A. turpiniae Andira cuyabensis Benthan Fabaceae Brazil Uchôa & Inga laurina Mimosaceae Ecuador 2002 Stone Andira humilis Martius Myrtaceae Nicácio, 2010 Syzygium jambos Myrtaceae Paraguay Uchoa & Psidium kennedyanum Caricacea Uchôa et al., Chrysophyllum gonocarpum Sapotaceae Peru Nicácio, 2010 Psidium guajava Combretaceae 2002 Engler + 68 Plant families Psidium guineense Anacardiaceae Zucchi, 2008 Uruguay Pouteria ramiflora Eugenia dodoneifolia Rosaceae worldwide (Uchoa Venezuela > 400 Host species Cambess. Rutaceae & Nicácio 2010) Syzygium jambos L. worldwide (Uchoa & Jacaratia heptaphylla (Vell.) Nicácio 2010) Terminalia catappa L. Table 1. Species of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea: Tephritidae) with *potential or **real Mangifera indica L. economic importance in South America. Spondias purpurea L. Prunus persicae L. Herein are considered species with **real economical importance those that have been Citrus sinensis historically reared from cultivated fruit species with economic value and, with *potential **A. zenildae Licania tomentosa Chrysobalanaceae Brazil Uchôa & economical importance those that the adults are polyphagous and were reared from some Zucchi Terminalia catappa Combretaceae Nicácio, 2010 genera of fruit trees in which occur species of fruit with commercial value. Andira cuyabensis Fabaceae Uchôa et al., The knowledge of trophic interactions between frugivorous Tephritoidea and their host Banara arguta Briquel Flacourtiaceae 2002 plants is absolutely necessary to guide strategies for integrated management of fruit fly Mouriri elleptica Melastomataceae Zucchi, 2008 pests (polyphagous or oligophagous), and for the conservation of stenophagous and Sorocea sprucei saxicola Moraceae monophagous species in their natural environments. Currently in Brazil, from the total of (Hassler) + 6 Plant Families 112 species of Anastrepha reported in our territory, are known the host plants for only 61 + 20 Host fruits in Zucchi (2008) species (54.46%), being unknown where 51 Anastrepha species (45.54%) are breeding in Zucchi (2008) neither whom are their natural enemies (Nicácio & Uchoa, 2011). Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 280 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 281

6. Native parasitoids of Anastrepha species and Ceratitis capitata protozoa and nematodes (Nicácio et al., 2011) on the frugivorous larvae of tephritoids. There are still no methodologies available, however, to unambiguously to evaluate these causes of parasitoids are the most important natural enemies of pest tephritoid larvae mortality to immature frugivorous flies, and this is an area that will require further research. throughout both the Neotropical and Nearctic Regions. These entomophagous insects help In the future is important to look for oviposition scars by parasitoids upon the third-instar reduce naturally, sometimes substantially, populations of Tephritidae and larvae or puparium of dead tephritoids to establish if they are correlated or not to death of Lonchaeidae pests in the field (Ovruski et al., 2009; Uchoa et al., 2003). Mass-rearing and flies (Nicácio et al., 2011). augmentative releases of braconid parasitoids have been considered an important component of area-wide management programs for some species of fruit flies, including widespread polyphagous species of Anastrepha and Ceratitis capitata (Marinho et al., 2009; Species of Species of Fruit Species of Host Family Country References Palenchar et al., 2009). Parasitoids Flies Host Fruits Alysiinae Biological control of frugivorous tephritoid larvae with native parasitoids is a promising Asobara Anastrepha obliqua Spondias Anacardiacaee Brazil Uchôa et component of integrated pest management programs (IPM), because it is environmentally anastrephae (Macquart) lutea L. al., 2003 safe and works in synergy with . is the most (Muesebek) Anastrepha bahiensis Silva et al., abundant and species rich parasitoid family of fruit flies in the Neotropical Region. Lima 2010 Species of this group also serve as bioindicators of the presence and absence of Costa et al., populations of their host insects (Nicácio et al. 2011). 2009 Idiasta delicata Duckeodendron Tritrophic interactions among wild tephritoids, their host plants and parasitoids, have been Anastrepha sp. Duckeodendraceae Brazil Costa et al., Papp cestroides a largely neglected field of study in some regions. It could suggest possible applications 2009 Kuhlm. for native parasitoid species upon frugivorous tephritoid key pests (Cancino et al., 2009). Phaenocarpa A. distincta Inga The autochthonous parasitoids are particularly interesting, because of their evolved Greene sp. Fabaceae Venezuela Trostle et pericarpa interactions over extensive periods of time with their hosts (Nicácio et al., 2011), they can al., 1999 Wharton & be effective in lowering pest populations in orchards (Cancino et al., 2009), keeping Carrejo tephritoids outbreak in check without diminishing the local , as may occur with the use of exotic natural enemies (Nicácio et al., 2011; Uchoa et al., 2003). Doryctobracon Nicácio et al. (2011) evaluated the incidence of parasitoids in larvae of fruit flies that areolatus Anastrepha amita Citharexylum Verbenaceae Brazil Marinho et infest several species of native and exotic fruit trees in the South Pantanal Region, Mato (Szépligeti) Zucchi myrianthum Myrtaceae Argentina al., 2009 Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Ninety-two species of fruits from 36 families and 22 orders were Anastrepha Cham. Sapotaceae Bolivia Ovruski et sampled. From 11 species of host fruits, we obtained 11,197 larvae of fruit flies; being fraterculus Psidium Anacardiaceae Brazil al., 2009 Braconidae and Figitidae the main recovered parasitoids. The Braconidae totaled (Wiedemann) guajava L. Clusiaceae Brazil Nicácio et 99.45%, represented by three species: Doryctobracon areolatus (Szépligeti), Utetes Anastrepha leptozona Pouteria Moraceae Brazil al., 2011 anastrephae (Viereck), and Opius bellus Gahan. The Figitidae were represented by Hendel ramiflora Melastomataceae Brazil Nicácio et Lopheucoila anastrephae (Rohwer) from puparia of Neosilba spp. (Lonchaeidae), infesting Anastrepha (Martius) Brazil al., 2011 pods of Inga laurina (Swartz). D. areolatus was associated with two species of Anastrepha: A. serpentina Puoteria torta Alvarenga rhedia Stone in Rheedia brasilensis Planchon & Triana, and A. zenildae Zucchi in Sorocea (Wiedemann) (Martius) et al., 2009 sprucei saxicola (Hassler) C.C. Berg. In Ximenia americana L., 14% of the larvae of Anastrepha obliqua Spondias Nicácio et Anastrepha spp. were parasitized and, D. areolatus reached more than 96% of total (Macquart) purpurea al., 2011 parasitism in this host fruit. The braconids were specific to Tephritidae (Tab. 2), and Anastrepha rheedia Rheedia Nicácio et the Figitidae species were associated only with larvae of Neosilba spp. (Lonchaeidae) (Tab. Stone brasiliensis al., 2011 4). Anastrepha zenildae Planchon & Zucchi Triana Parasitism rates found in surveys in which the fruits were removed from the field Ceratitis capitata Sorocea sprucei and carried to laboratory condition, certainly are unreal, because the fruits were picked up (Wiedemann) saxicola from the natural environments, with possibly, some eggs, and larvae of first and second (Hassler) instars of the fruit flies. So, when this immature tephritoids have left the field and have Mouriri arrived in the laboratory, they have had no more chance to be parasitized (Uchoa et al., elliptica 2003). Another mortality factor related of parasitoid attack that is not measured by Martius percentage of parasitism is the damage caused by the scars left by the ovipositor of parasitoid, even when ovipositions failed, and the possibility of subsequent infections by viruses, bacteria, fungi, Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 280 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 281

6. Native parasitoids of Anastrepha species and Ceratitis capitata protozoa and nematodes (Nicácio et al., 2011) on the frugivorous larvae of tephritoids. There are still no methodologies available, however, to unambiguously to evaluate these causes of Hymenoptera parasitoids are the most important natural enemies of pest tephritoid larvae mortality to immature frugivorous flies, and this is an area that will require further research. throughout both the Neotropical and Nearctic Regions. These entomophagous insects help In the future is important to look for oviposition scars by parasitoids upon the third-instar reduce naturally, sometimes substantially, populations of Tephritidae and Lonchaeidae larvae or puparium of dead tephritoids to establish if they are correlated or not to death of pests in the field (Ovruski et al., 2009; Uchôa et al., 2003). Mass-rearing and augmentative flies (Nicácio et al., 2011). releases of braconid parasitoids have been considered an important component of area-wide management programs for some species of fruit flies, including widespread polyphagous Species of Species of Fruit Species of Host Family Country References species of Anastrepha and Ceratitis capitata (Marinho et al., 2009; Palenchar et al., 2009). Parasitoids Flies Host Fruits Biological control of frugivorous tephritoid larvae with native parasitoids is a promising Alysiinae component of integrated pest management programs (IPM), because it is environmentally Asobara Anastrepha obliqua Spondias Anacardiacaee Brazil Uchoa et safe and works in synergy with sterile insect technique. Braconidae is the most abundant anastrephae (Macquart) lutea L. al., 2003 and species rich parasitoid family of fruit flies in the Neotropical Region. Species of this (Muesebek) Anastrepha bahiensis Silva et al., group also serve as bioindicators of the presence and absence of populations of their host Lima 2010 insects (Nicácio et al. 2011). Costa et al., 2009 Tritrophic interactions among wild tephritoids, their host plants and parasitoids, have been Idiasta delicata Duckeodendron a largely neglected field of study in some regions. It could suggest possible applications for Anastrepha sp. Duckeodendraceae Brazil Costa et al., Papp cestroides native parasitoid species upon frugivorous tephritoid key pests (Cancino et al., 2009). The 2009 Kuhlm. autochthonous parasitoids are particularly interesting, because of their evolved interactions Phaenocarpa A. distincta Greene Inga sp. Fabaceae Venezuela Trostle et over extensive periods of time with their hosts (Nicácio et al., 2011), they can be effective in pericarpa al., 1999 lowering pest populations in orchards (Cancino et al., 2009), keeping tephritoids outbreak in Wharton & check without diminishing the local biodiversity, as may occur with the use of exotic natural Carrejo enemies (Nicácio et al., 2011; Uchôa et al., 2003). Opiinae Nicácio et al. (2011) evaluated the incidence of parasitoids in larvae of fruit flies that infest Doryctobracon several species of native and exotic fruit trees in the South Pantanal Region, Mato Grosso do areolatus Anastrepha amita Citharexylum Verbenaceae Brazil Marinho et Sul, Brazil. Ninety-two species of fruits from 36 families and 22 orders were sampled. From (Szépligeti) Zucchi myrianthum Myrtaceae Argentina al., 2009 11 species of host fruits, we obtained 11,197 larvae of fruit flies; being Braconidae and Anastrepha Cham. Sapotaceae Bolivia Ovruski et Figitidae the main recovered parasitoids. The Braconidae totaled 99.45%, represented by fraterculus Psidium Anacardiaceae Brazil al., 2009 three species: Doryctobracon areolatus (Szépligeti), Utetes anastrephae (Viereck), and Opius (Wiedemann) guajava L. Clusiaceae Brazil Nicácio et bellus Gahan. The Figitidae were represented by Lopheucoila anastrephae (Rohwer) from Anastrepha leptozona Pouteria Moraceae Brazil al., 2011 puparia of Neosilba spp. (Lonchaeidae), infesting pods of Inga laurina (Swartz). D. areolatus Hendel ramiflora Melastomataceae Brazil Nicácio et was associated with two species of Anastrepha: A. rhedia Stone in Rheedia brasilensis Planchon Anastrepha (Martius) Brazil al., 2011 & Triana, and A. zenildae Zucchi in Sorocea sprucei saxicola (Hassler) C.C. Berg. In Ximenia serpentina Puoteria torta Alvarenga americana L., 14% of the larvae of Anastrepha spp. were parasitized and, D. areolatus reached (Wiedemann) (Martius) et al., 2009 more than 96% of total parasitism in this host fruit. The braconids were specific to Anastrepha obliqua Spondias Nicácio et Tephritidae (Tab. 2), and the Figitidae species were associated only with larvae of Neosilba (Macquart) purpurea al., 2011 spp. (Lonchaeidae) (Tab. 4). Anastrepha rheedia Rheedia Nicácio et Stone brasiliensis al., 2011 Parasitism rates found in surveys in which the fruits were removed from the field and Anastrepha zenildae Planchon & carried to laboratory condition, certainly are unreal, because the fruits were picked up from Zucchi Triana the natural environments, with possibly, some eggs, and larvae of first and second instars of Ceratitis capitata Sorocea sprucei the fruit flies. So, when this immature tephritoids have left the field and have arrived in the (Wiedemann) saxicola laboratory, they have had no more chance to be parasitized (Uchôa et al., 2003). Another (Hassler) mortality factor related of parasitoid attack that is not measured by percentage of parasitism Mouriri is the damage caused by the scars left by the ovipositor of parasitoid, even when elliptica ovipositions failed, and the possibility of subsequent infections by viruses, bacteria, fungi, Martius Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 282 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 283

Species of Species of Fruit Species of Host Family Country References anastrephae and Opius bellus (Tab. 2), because they are ubiquitous, frequent and abundant in Parasitoids Flies Host Fruits several regions of South America. Going forward is important to focus in studies on their Doryctobracon Anastrepha Psidium Myrtaceae Argentina Ovruski et biology and behavior, in order to multiply them in laboratory for use in programs of brasiliensis fraterculus guajava Rosaceae Brazil al., 2009 integrated pest management in horticulture. (Szépligeti) Eugenia Bolivia Ovruski et uniflora L. Brazil al., 2009 7. Insect predators on Anastrepha species and Ceratitis capitata Feijoa Marinho et sellowiana O. al., 2009 The main predators for frugivorous larvae of tephritids worldwide has been the ants: Berg. Solenopsis geminata (Fabricius), Solenopsis spp., and Pheidole sp. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Prunus (Aluja et al., 2005); the myrmeleontid Myrmeleon brasileiensis (Navás) (Neuroptera) persicae (Missirian et al., 2006); some species rove beetles, probably Belonuchus Nordmann Prunus (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae), and Carabidae (Coleoptera) (Uchôa, M. A., unpubl.). Galli & salicina Lindl. Rampazo (1996) listed the carabids Calosoma granulatum Perty, Calleida sp., and Scarites sp., Doryctobracon Anastrepha Psidium Myrtaceae Bolivia Ovruski et and the staphylinids: Belonuchus haemorrhoidalis (Fabricius), and Belonuchus rufipennis crawfordi fraterculus guajava Rosaceae al., 2009 (Fabricius), among the predators of Anastrepha spp. larvae in Brazil. Because all these (Viereck) Prunus predators are generalist upon larvae of Anastrepha species, they probably are also able of persicae (L.) preying upon Ceratitis capitata larvae. Therefore, when these insects are present, it is Doryctobracon Anastrepha pickeli Manihot Euphorbiaceae Brazil Uchoa et important conserve their populations in the orchards to help in natural control of fruit flies. fluminensis Lima 1934 esculenta al., 2003 (Lima) Anastrepha montei Crantz Alvarenga Lima et al., 2009 8. Food attractants, parapheromones and pheromones to fruit flies Opius bellus Anastrepha Ximenia Olacaceae Brazil Nicácio et Three kinds of attractants have been proposed to catch fruit flies in traps: food lures, Gahan alveatoides americana L. Euphorbiaceae Brazil al., 2011 parapheromones, and sex pheromones. Although the McPhail traps baited with food lures Blanchard Manihot Myrtaceae Bolivia Alvarenga are the most usually employed in the field to catch tephritids worldwide, they have low Anastrepha pickeli esculenta Rosaceae et al., 2009 attractiveness to fruit flies, normally attracting adults only from a short distance, about 10 m A. fraterculus Psidium Ovruski et far from the source, depending if the wind is blowing continuously. The most usual baits are guajava al., 2009 hydrolyzed proteinaceous from soybean, corn or torula yeast. According to Aluja et al. Prunus (1989) only 30% of the flies that are attracted to near the traps with food baits are actually persicae captured. Utetes Anastrepha Eugenia Myrtaceae Argentina Ovruski et anastrephae fraterculus uniflora Anacardiaceae Bolivia al., 2009 Some blends of synthetic dry food lures (ammonium acetate + trimethylamine (Viereck) Anastrepha obliqua Psidium Rosaceae Brazil Uchoa et hydrochloride + putrescine) have been prepared to catch Ceratitis capitata, Anastrepha and guajava Euphorbiaceae Bolivia al., 2003 Bactrocera species (Leblanc et al., 2010), but like the hydrolysate proteinaceous baits, it has Spondias Brazil Ovruski et the inconvenient of catching nontarget insects from several Orders, such as Diptera (e.g. lutea L. al., 2009 , ), Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera, Neuroptera, Orthoptera, and in Spondias Alvarenga some places, till small vertebrates such as amphibians (Uchôa, M. A., unpubl.). purpurea L. et al., 2009 Prunus The compounds called parapheromones, such as trimedlure, cuelure and methyl eugenol persicae are efficient on capturing fruit flies. They have been applied in traps to capture species of Manihot Ceratitis, and Bactrocera in the field. Differently from the common food baits, like esculenta hydrolyzed proteinaceous (corn, soybean) or torula yeast, the parapheromones are Table 2. Trophic interactions between koinobiont braconid parasitoids, tephritid fruit flies, considered more selective for catching fruit flies. This is an interesting trait of these and host plants in South America. chemicals due to avoid the capture of non-target insects. But, on other hand, due the fact they capture almost exclusively male specimens, they are a problem in cases when the aim Nine native species of braconid parasitoids have been recorded in several states of Brazil, of the research is to survey the diversity of fruit flies species. Because, in some taxa, the and in other South American Countries. The most promising species to study with the view accurate identification is based mainly in females. Furthermore, they are comparatively to apply in biocontrol programs against fruit fly pests are Doryctobracon areolatus, Utetes more expensive and harder to find in the local markets than the food baits. Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 282 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 283

Species of Species of Fruit Species of Host Family Country References anastrephae and Opius bellus (Tab. 2), because they are ubiquitous, frequent and abundant in Parasitoids Flies Host Fruits several regions of South America. Going forward is important to focus in studies on their Doryctobracon Anastrepha Psidium Myrtaceae Argentina Ovruski et biology and behavior, in order to multiply them in laboratory for use in programs of brasiliensis fraterculus guajava Rosaceae Brazil al., 2009 integrated pest management in horticulture. (Szépligeti) Eugenia Bolivia Ovruski et uniflora L. Brazil al., 2009 7. Insect predators on Anastrepha species and Ceratitis capitata Feijoa Marinho et sellowiana O. al., 2009 The main predators for frugivorous larvae of tephritids worldwide has been the ants: Berg. Solenopsis geminata (Fabricius), Solenopsis spp., and Pheidole sp. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Prunus (Aluja et al., 2005); the myrmeleontid Myrmeleon brasileiensis (Navás) (Neuroptera) persicae (Missirian et al., 2006); some species rove beetles, probably Belonuchus Prunus Nordmann (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae), and Carabidae (Coleoptera) (Uchoa, M. A., salicina Lindl. unpubl.). Galli & Rampazo (1996) listed the carabids Calosoma granulatum Perty, Calleida Doryctobracon Anastrepha Psidium Myrtaceae Bolivia Ovruski et sp., and Scarites sp., and the staphylinids: Belonuchus haemorrhoidalis (Fabricius), and crawfordi fraterculus guajava Rosaceae al., 2009 Belonuchus rufipennis (Fabricius), among the predators of Anastrepha spp. larvae in (Viereck) Prunus Brazil. Because all these predators are generalist upon larvae of Anastrepha species, persicae (L.) they probably are also able of preying upon Ceratitis capitata larvae. Therefore, when Doryctobracon Anastrepha pickeli Manihot Euphorbiaceae Brazil Uchôa et these insects are present, it is important conserve their populations in the orchards to fluminensis Lima 1934 esculenta al., 2003 help in natural control of fruit flies. (Lima) Anastrepha montei Crantz Alvarenga Lima et al., 2009 Opius bellus Anastrepha Ximenia Olacaceae Brazil Nicácio et 8. Food attractants, parapheromones and pheromones to fruit flies Gahan alveatoides americana L. Euphorbiaceae Brazil al., 2011 Three kinds of attractants have been proposed to catch fruit flies in traps: food lures, Blanchard Manihot Myrtaceae Bolivia Alvarenga parapheromones, and sex pheromones. Although the McPhail traps baited with food lures Anastrepha pickeli esculenta Rosaceae et al., 2009 are the most usually employed in the field to catch tephritids worldwide, they have A. fraterculus Psidium Ovruski et low attractiveness to fruit flies, normally attracting adults only from a short distance, about guajava al., 2009 10 m far from the source, depending if the wind is blowing continuously. The most usual Prunus baits are hydrolyzed proteinaceous from soybean, corn or torula yeast. According to persicae Aluja et al. (1989) only 30% of the flies that are attracted to near the traps with food Utetes Anastrepha Eugenia Myrtaceae Argentina Ovruski et baits are actually captured. anastrephae fraterculus uniflora Anacardiaceae Bolivia al., 2009 (Viereck) Anastrepha obliqua Psidium Rosaceae Brazil Uchôa et Some blends of synthetic dry food lures (ammonium acetate + trimethylamine guajava Euphorbiaceae Bolivia al., 2003 hydrochloride + putrescine) have been prepared to catch Ceratitis capitata, Anastrepha and Spondias Brazil Ovruski et Bactrocera species (Leblanc et al., 2010), but like the hydrolysate proteinaceous baits, it lutea L. al., 2009 has the inconvenient of catching nontarget insects from several Orders, such as Diptera Spondias Alvarenga (e.g. Calliphoridae, Tachinidae), Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera, Neuroptera, Orthoptera, purpurea L. et al., 2009 and in some places, till small vertebrates such as amphibians (Uchoa, M. A., unpubl.). Prunus persicae The compounds called parapheromones, such as trimedlure, cuelure and methyl Manihot eugenol are efficient on capturing fruit flies. They have been applied in traps to capture esculenta species of Ceratitis, Dacus and Bactrocera in the field. Differently from the common food Table 2. Trophic interactions between koinobiont braconid parasitoids, tephritid fruit flies, baits, like hydrolyzed proteinaceous (corn, soybean) or torula yeast, the and host plants in South America. parapheromones are considered more selective for catching fruit flies. This is an interesting trait of these chemicals due to avoid the capture of non-target insects. But, Nine native species of braconid parasitoids have been recorded in several states of Brazil, on other hand, due the fact they capture almost exclusively male specimens, they are a and in other South American Countries. The most promising species to study with the view problem in cases when the aim of the research is to survey the diversity of fruit flies to apply in biocontrol programs against fruit fly pests are Doryctobracon areolatus, Utetes species. Because, in some taxa, the accurate identification is based mainly in females. Furthermore, they are comparatively more expensive and harder to find in the local markets than the food baits. Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 284 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 285

The pheromones are considered biochemically ideals to control fruit flies, because generally Host’s Floral they are species-specific, environmentally safe, being non-toxic till to the target species. Buds (FLB), However, unlike other insects such as moths, beetles, and the true bugs; Tephritidae have a Species Apical Buds (AB), Plant Family Country References complex communication system, involving short range vision and acoustic signaling, Fruits (FRU), or beyond the chemical language (see life history of Anastrepha species). Although in Mexico Pods (PO) has been reported the capture of A. suspensa females in traps baited with virgin males Dasiopinae (Perdomo et al., 1975, 1976), in Brazil, Felix et al. (2009) found that Jackson and McPhail Dasiops alveofrons Prunus armeniaca Rosaceae USA McAlpine, 1961 traps baited with food bait were significantly more attractive to females of Anastrepha McAlpine L. (FRU) sororcula that traps baited with fruit fly sexually mature conspecific males. The last authors Dasiops ? ? Norrbom & did not found significant capture of A. sororcula females in the traps baited with conspecific brevicornis McAlpine, 1997 virgin males releasing sex pheromone; conspecific female neither conspecific couples. So, (Williston) probably, sex pheromone of Anastrepha fruit flies did not show high potential to be applied Dasiops caustonae Passiflora Passifloraceae Venezuela Norrbom & in field to control this group of horticultural pests. For Lonchaeidae, only food baits based Norrbom & molissima (H.B.K.) McAlpine, 1997 on protein hydrolysates have been used. Lonchaeids are well captured into the same McAlpine (FRU) McPhail traps used for sampling of tephritids. Dasiops curubae Passiflora Passifloraceae Colombia Steyskal, 1980 Steyskal molissima (H.B.K.) 9. Life history of Dasiops and Neosilba species (Lonchaeidae) (FLB) The species of Dasiops (Dasiopinae) are probably stenophagous (see Aluja & Mangan, 2008), Dasiops dentatus Passiflora ligularis Passifloraceae Peru Norrbom & feeding mainly on flowers or fruits Passiflora spp. (: Passifloraceae) (Nicácio Norrbom & Juss. (FRU) Mcalpine, 1997 & Uchoa, 2011; Uchoa et al., 2002). On other hand, Neosilba species (Lonchaeinae) are McAlpine mainly polyphagous, attacking a broad array of host plant groups in South America Dasiops frieseni P. alata W. Curtis Passifloraceae Brazil Aguiar-Menezes (Tab. 3). Neosilba perezi attacks the terminal buds of cassava (Euphorbiaceae), but this Norrbom & (FRU) et al., 2004 behavior of feeding on tissue different of fruits and flowers is uncommon for other McAlpine Lonchaeidae species in South America, where the lance flies colonize fruits of both, native Dasiops gracilis P. edulis Sims Passifloraceae Venezuela Norrbom & or exotic species (Tab. 3). Caires et al. (2009) found five species of Neosilba [Neosilba bifida Norrbom & (FLB and FRU) Mcalpine, 1997 Strikis & Prado, N. certa (Walker), N. pendula (Bezzi), N. zadolicha McAlpine & Steyskal, McAlpine P. ligularis Juss. Passifloraceae Colombia Norrbom & and Neosilba morphotype MSP1] feeding in fruits of a mistletoe plant, Psittacanthus (FRU) Mcalpine, 1997 acinarius (Martius) (as Psittacanthus plagiophyllus Eichler) (Santalales: Loranthaceae) in the Brazilian Pantanal. P. ligularis Juss. Passifloraceae Costa Rica Norrbom & (FRU) Mcalpine, 1997 10. Pest status of Dasiops and Neosilba P. pinannatistipula Passifloraceae Colombia Norrbom & (Cav.) (FRU) Mcalpine, 1997 Up to date at least 34 species of Lonchaeidae that feed on live tissue of plants are reported Dasiops inedulis Passiflora edulis Passifloraceae Brazil Uchôa et al., 2002 in Americas. Dasiops species are probably stenophagous (Aluja & Mangan, 2008), feeding Steyskal Sims (FLB) in flowers or fruits of Passiflora (Passifloraceae). Some of them (e.g. D. inedulis), are P. edulis (FLB) Brazil Aguiar-Menezes important pest in flower buds of passion fruits in South America (Peñaranda et al., 1986; et al., 2004 Uchoa et al., 2002). By other hand, some species of the same genus have been proposed to be biocontrol agents for weed Passiflora introduced in Hawaii (Norrbom & McAlpine, 1997). P. edulis (FLB) Colombia Chacon & Rojas, In Brazil four Dasiops species are reported (D. frieseni Norrbom & McAlpine D. inedulis 1984 Stayskal, D. longulus Norrbom & McAlpine, and D. ypezi Norrbom & McAlpine). D. inedulis P. edulis (FLB) Colombia Peñaranda et al., and D. longulus were reared from flower buds, but D. frieseni and D. ypezi were recovered 1986 from fruits (Tab. 3). P. edulis (FLB) Panama Steyskal, 1980 Currently 21 species of Neosilba McAlpine are recorded in the Neotropical Region. From this P. lindeniana Venezuela Norrbom & total, interestingly, only five species [Neosilba dimidiata (Curran) from Colombia Planch. (FRU) Mcalpine, 1997 and Trinidad, N. fuscipennis (Curran) from Panama, N. longicerata (Hennig) from Peru, N. P. rubra L. (FRU) Venezuela Norrbom & major (Malloch) from Colombia, Peru and Mexico, and N. oaxacana McAlpine & Mcalpine, 1997 Steyskal from Mexico], are not yet reported in Brazil. As far as we know the species of the genus Neosilba are highly polyphagous, attacking plant tissues, especially fruit (Tab. 3). Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 284 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 285

The pheromones are considered biochemically ideals to control fruit flies, because generally Host’s Floral they are species-specific, environmentally safe, being non-toxic till to the target species. Buds (FLB), However, unlike other insects such as moths, beetles, and the true bugs; Tephritidae have a Species Apical Buds (AB), Plant Family Country References complex communication system, involving short range vision and acoustic signaling, Fruits (FRU), or beyond the chemical language (see life history of Anastrepha species). Although in Mexico Pods (PO) has been reported the capture of A. suspensa females in traps baited with virgin males Dasiopinae (Perdomo et al., 1975, 1976), in Brazil, Felix et al. (2009) found that Jackson and McPhail Dasiops alveofrons Prunus armeniaca Rosaceae USA McAlpine, 1961 traps baited with food bait were significantly more attractive to females of Anastrepha McAlpine L. (FRU) sororcula that traps baited with fruit fly sexually mature conspecific males. The last authors Dasiops ? ? Jamaica Norrbom & did not found significant capture of A. sororcula females in the traps baited with conspecific brevicornis McAlpine, 1997 virgin males releasing sex pheromone; conspecific female neither conspecific couples. So, (Williston) probably, sex pheromone of Anastrepha fruit flies did not show high potential to be applied Dasiops caustonae Passiflora Passifloraceae Venezuela Norrbom & in field to control this group of horticultural pests. For Lonchaeidae, only food baits based Norrbom & molissima (H.B.K.) McAlpine, 1997 on protein hydrolysates have been used. Lonchaeids are well captured into the same McAlpine (FRU) McPhail traps used for sampling of tephritids. Dasiops curubae Passiflora Passifloraceae Colombia Steyskal, 1980 Steyskal molissima (H.B.K.) 9. Life history of Dasiops and Neosilba species (Lonchaeidae) (FLB) The species of Dasiops (Dasiopinae) are probably stenophagous (see Aluja & Mangan, 2008), Dasiops dentatus Passiflora ligularis Passifloraceae Peru Norrbom & feeding mainly on flowers or fruits Passiflora spp. (Malpighiales: Passifloraceae) (Nicácio & Norrbom & Juss. (FRU) Mcalpine, 1997 Uchôa, 2011; Uchôa et al., 2002). On other hand, Neosilba species (Lonchaeinae) are mainly McAlpine polyphagous, attacking a broad array of host plant groups in South America (Tab. 3). Dasiops frieseni P. alata W. Curtis Passifloraceae Brazil Aguiar-Menezes Neosilba perezi attacks the terminal buds of cassava (Euphorbiaceae), but this behavior of Norrbom & (FRU) et al., 2004 feeding on tissue different of fruits and flowers is uncommon for other Lonchaeidae species McAlpine in South America, where the lance flies colonize fruits of both, native or exotic species (Tab. Dasiops gracilis P. edulis Sims Passifloraceae Venezuela Norrbom & 3). Caires et al. (2009) found five species of Neosilba [Neosilba bifida Strikis & Prado, N. certa Norrbom & (FLB and FRU) Mcalpine, 1997 (Walker), N. pendula (Bezzi), N. zadolicha McAlpine & Steyskal, and Neosilba morphotype McAlpine P. ligularis Juss. Passifloraceae Colombia Norrbom & MSP1] feeding in fruits of a mistletoe plant, Psittacanthus acinarius (Martius) (as Psittacanthus (FRU) Mcalpine, 1997 plagiophyllus Eichler) (Santalales: Loranthaceae) in the Brazilian Pantanal. P. ligularis Juss. Passifloraceae Costa Rica Norrbom & (FRU) Mcalpine, 1997 10. Pest status of Dasiops and Neosilba P . pinannatistipula Passifloraceae Colombia Norrbom & Up to date at least 34 species of Lonchaeidae that feed on live tissue of plants are reported in (Cav.) (FRU) Mcalpine, 1997 Americas. Dasiops species are probably stenophagous (Aluja & Mangan, 2008), feeding in Dasiops inedulis Passiflora edulis Passifloraceae Brazil Uchoa et al., 2002 flowers or fruits of Passiflora (Passifloraceae). Some of them (e.g. D. inedulis), are important Steyskal Sims (FLB) pest in flower buds of passion fruits in South America (Peñaranda et al., 1986; Uchôa et al., P. edulis (FLB) Brazil Aguiar-Menezes 2002). By other hand, some species of the same genus have been proposed to be biocontrol agents for weed Passiflora introduced in Hawaii (Norrbom & McAlpine, 1997). In Brazil four et al., 2004 Dasiops species are reported (D. frieseni Norrbom & McAlpine D. inedulis Stayskal, D. longulus P. edulis (FLB) Colombia Chacon & Rojas, Norrbom & McAlpine, and D. ypezi Norrbom & McAlpine). D. inedulis and D. longulus were 1984 reared from flower buds, but D. frieseni and D. ypezi were recovered from fruits (Tab. 3). P. edulis (FLB) Colombia Peñaranda et al., 1986 Currently 21 species of Neosilba McAlpine are recorded in the Neotropical Region. From this P. edulis (FLB) Panama Steyskal, 1980 total, interestingly, only five species [Neosilba dimidiata (Curran) from Colombia and Trinidad, N. fuscipennis (Curran) from Panama, N. longicerata (Hennig) from Peru, N. major P. lindeniana Venezuela Norrbom & (Malloch) from Colombia, Peru and Mexico, and N. oaxacana McAlpine & Steyskal from Planch. (FRU) Mcalpine, 1997 Mexico], are not yet reported in Brazil. As far as we know the species of the genus Neosilba P. rubra L. (FRU) Venezuela Norrbom & are highly polyphagous, attacking plant tissues, especially fruit (Tab. 3). Mcalpine, 1997 Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 286 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 287

Host’s Floral Host’s Floral Buds (FLB), Buds (FLB), Species Apical Buds (AB), Plant Family Country References Species Apical Buds (AB), Plant Family Country References Fruits (FRU), or Fruits (FRU), or Pods (PO) Pods (PO) Dasiops longulus Passiflora alata Passifloraceae Brazil Aguiar-Menezes Neosilba certa Opercunina alata Convovulaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Norrbom & (FLB) et al., 2004 (Walker) (Hamilton) (FRU) 2010 McAlpine P. edulis (FRU) Passifloraceae Brazil Norrbom & Terminalia catappa Combretaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Mcalpine, 1997 L. (FRU) 2010 Dasiops passifloris Passifloraceae USA Steyskal, 1980 Ficus insipida Moraceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, McAlpine L. (FRU) Willdenow (FRU) 2010 Dasiops rugifrons Passiflora alata Passifloraceae Venezuela Norrbom & Hennig (FRU) Mcalpine, 1997 Syzygium jambos Myrtaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, L. (FRU) 2010 ? ? Peru Korytkowski & Ojeda, 1971 Pouteria glomerata Sapotaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Dasiops rugulosus ? ? Trinidad Norrbom & (Miquel) (FRU) 2010 Norrbom & Mcalpine, 1997 Pouteria torta Sapotaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, McAlpine (Martius) (FRU) 2010 Dasiops ypezi Passiflora ligularis Passifloraceae Colombia Norrbom & Norrbom & (FRU) Mcalpine, 1997 Physalis angualata Solanaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, L. (FRU) 2010 McAlpine P. edulis (FRU) Passifloraceae Brazil Uchoa, M. A.- Unpubl. Psittacanthus Loranthaceae Brazil Caires et al., 2009 Lonchaeinae acinarius Neosilba batesi (Martius) (FRU) (Curran) Mangifera indica Anacardiaceae Mexico McAlpine & Inga velutina Fabaceae Brazil Strikis et al., 2011 L. (FRU) Caricaceae Guatemala Steyskal, 1982 Willd. (PO) Carica papaya L. Lauraceae Colombia Ahlmark & Steck, (FRU) Rutaceae 1997 Pouteria caimito Sapotaceae Brazil Strikis et al., 2011 Persea americana (Ruiz & Pav.) Mill. (FRU) (FRU) Citrus sinensis (L.) Coffea arabica L. Rubiaceae Brazil Souza et al., 2005 (FRU) (FRU) Neosilba bella Inga edulis Fabaceae Brazil Strikis et al., 2011 Neosilba dimidiata Annona spp. Annonaceae Colombia Peña & Bennett, Strikis & Prado Martius (PO) (Curran) (FRU) Trinidad 1995 Inga velutina McAlpine & Willd. (PO) Steyskal, 1982 Neosilba bifida Sorocea sprucei Moraceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Neosilba Brassica rapa L. Brassicaceae Peru Urrutia & Strikis & Prado saxicola (Hassler) 2010 flavipennis () Korytkowski, (FRU) (Morge) unpublished Psittacanthus Loranthaceae Brazil Caires et al., 2009 Neosilba Unknown Unknown Panama McAlpine & acinarius fuscipennis Steyskal, 1982 (Martius) (FRU) (Curran) Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 286 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 287

Host’s Floral Host’s Floral Buds (FLB), Buds (FLB), Species Apical Buds (AB), Plant Family Country References Species Apical Buds (AB), Plant Family Country References Fruits (FRU), or Fruits (FRU), or Pods (PO) Pods (PO) Dasiops longulus Passiflora alata Passifloraceae Brazil Aguiar-Menezes Neosilba certa Opercunina alata Convovulaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Norrbom & (FLB) et al., 2004 (Walker) (Hamilton) (FRU) 2010 McAlpine P. edulis (FRU) Passifloraceae Brazil Norrbom & Terminalia catappa Combretaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Mcalpine, 1997 L. (FRU) 2010 Dasiops passifloris Passiflora suberosa Passifloraceae USA Steyskal, 1980 Ficus insipida Moraceae Brazil & Nicácio, McAlpine L. (FRU) Uchoa Willdenow (FRU) 2010 Dasiops rugifrons Passiflora alata Passifloraceae Venezuela Norrbom & Hennig (FRU) Mcalpine, 1997 Syzygium jambos Myrtaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, L. (FRU) 2010 ? ? Peru Korytkowski & Ojeda, 1971 Pouteria glomerata Sapotaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Dasiops rugulosus ? ? Trinidad Norrbom & (Miquel) (FRU) 2010 Norrbom & Mcalpine, 1997 Pouteria torta Sapotaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, McAlpine (Martius) (FRU) 2010 Dasiops ypezi Passiflora ligularis Passifloraceae Colombia Norrbom & Norrbom & (FRU) Mcalpine, 1997 Physalis angualata Solanaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, L. (FRU) 2010 McAlpine P. edulis (FRU) Passifloraceae Brazil Uchôa, M. A.- Unpubl. Psittacanthus Loranthaceae Brazil Caires et al., 2009 Lonchaeinae acinarius Neosilba batesi (Martius) (FRU) (Curran) Mangifera indica Anacardiaceae Mexico McAlpine & Inga velutina Fabaceae Brazil Strikis et al., 2011 L. (FRU) Caricaceae Guatemala Steyskal, 1982 Willd. (PO) Carica papaya L. Lauraceae Colombia Ahlmark & Steck, (FRU) Rutaceae 1997 Pouteria caimito Sapotaceae Brazil Strikis et al., 2011 Persea americana (Ruiz & Pav.) Mill. (FRU) (FRU) Citrus sinensis (L.) Coffea arabica L. Rubiaceae Brazil Souza et al., 2005 (FRU) (FRU) Neosilba bella Inga edulis Fabaceae Brazil Strikis et al., 2011 Neosilba dimidiata Annona spp. Annonaceae Colombia Peña & Bennett, Strikis & Prado Martius (PO) (Curran) (FRU) Trinidad 1995 Inga velutina McAlpine & Willd. (PO) Steyskal, 1982 Neosilba bifida Sorocea sprucei Moraceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Neosilba Brassica rapa L. Brassicaceae Peru Urrutia & Strikis & Prado saxicola (Hassler) 2010 flavipennis (Roots) Korytkowski, (FRU) (Morge) unpublished Psittacanthus Loranthaceae Brazil Caires et al., 2009 Neosilba Unknown Unknown Panama McAlpine & acinarius fuscipennis Steyskal, 1982 (Martius) (FRU) (Curran) Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 288 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 289

Host’s Floral Host’s Floral Buds (FLB), Buds (FLB), Species Apical Buds (AB), Plant Family Country References Species Apical Buds (AB), Plant Family Country References Fruits (FRU), or Fruits (FRU), or Pods (PO) Pods (PO) Neosilba Spondia dulcis Anacardiaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Neosilba inesperata Inga laurina Fabaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, glaberrima Parkinson (FRU) 2010 Strikis & Prado (Swartz) (PO) 2010 (Wiedemann) Annona crassiflora Annonaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Psidium Myrtaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Martius (FRU) 2010 cattleianum Sabine 2010 (FRU) T. catappa (FRU) Combretaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Schoepfia sp. Olacaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, 2010 (FRU) 2010

Ficus insipida Moraceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Eryobotria japonica Rosaceae Brazil Strikis & Prado, (FRU) 2010 (Thunb.) (FRU) 2009

Syzygium jambos Myrtaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Citrus jambhiri Rutaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, (FRU) 2010 Lush (FRU) 2010

Ximenia americana Olacaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Pouteria ramiflora Sapotaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, (Martius) (FRU) 2010 L. (FRU) 2010 Physalis angulata Solanaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Alibertia edulis A. Rubiaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, L. (FRU) 2010 Richard (FRU) 2010 Solanum Solanaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Genipa americana Rubiaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, sisymbriifolium 2010 L. (FRU) 2010 Lamarck (FRU) Neosilba Unknown Unknown Peru McAlpine & Coffea arabica L. Rubiaceae Brazil Souza et al., 2005 longicerata Steyskal, 1982 (FRU) (Hennig) Neosilba major Capsicum annuum Solanaceae Colombia McAlpine & Pouteria ramiflora Sapotaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, (Malloch) L. (FRU) Peru Steyskal, 1982 (Martius) (FRU) 2010 Mexico Pouteria torta Sapotaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Neosilba Allogoptera Arecaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, (Martius) (FRU) 2010 morphotype leucocalyx (Drude) 2010 MSP1 (FRU) Neosilba inesperata T. catappa (FRU) Combretaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Neosilba Carica papaya L. Caricaceae Brazil McAlpine & Strikis & Prado 2010 nicrocaeruela (FRU) Steyskal, 1982 (Malloch) Pouteria sp. (FRU) Sapotaceae Strikis et al., 2011 Opercunina alata Convovulaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Neosilba oaxacana ? ? Mexico McAlpine & (Hamilton) (FRU) 2010 McAlpine & Steyskal, 1982 Steyskal Strychnos Loganiaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Neosilba peltae ? ? Mexico McAlpine & pseudoquina 2010 McAlpine & Passiflora edulis Passifloraceae Brazil Steyskal, 1982 St.Hilarie (FRU) Steyskal Sims Strikis et al., 2011 Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 288 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 289

Host’s Floral Host’s Floral Buds (FLB), Buds (FLB), Species Apical Buds (AB), Plant Family Country References Species Apical Buds (AB), Plant Family Country References Fruits (FRU), or Fruits (FRU), or Pods (PO) Pods (PO) Neosilba Spondia dulcis Anacardiaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Neosilba inesperata Inga laurina Fabaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, glaberrima Parkinson (FRU) 2010 Strikis & Prado (Swartz) (PO) 2010 (Wiedemann) Annona crassiflora Annonaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Psidium Myrtaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Martius (FRU) 2010 cattleianum Sabine 2010 (FRU) T. catappa (FRU) Combretaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Schoepfia sp. Olacaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, 2010 (FRU) 2010

Ficus insipida Moraceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Eryobotria japonica Rosaceae Brazil Strikis & Prado, (FRU) 2010 (Thunb.) (FRU) 2009

Syzygium jambos Myrtaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Citrus jambhiri Rutaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, (FRU) 2010 Lush (FRU) 2010

Ximenia americana Olacaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Pouteria ramiflora Sapotaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, (Martius) (FRU) 2010 L. (FRU) 2010 Physalis angulata Solanaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Alibertia edulis A. Rubiaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, L. (FRU) 2010 Richard (FRU) 2010 Solanum Solanaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Genipa americana Rubiaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, sisymbriifolium 2010 L. (FRU) 2010 Lamarck (FRU) Neosilba Unknown Unknown Peru McAlpine & Coffea arabica L. Rubiaceae Brazil Souza et al., 2005 longicerata Steyskal, 1982 (FRU) (Hennig) Neosilba major Capsicum annuum Solanaceae Colombia McAlpine & Pouteria ramiflora Sapotaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, (Malloch) L. (FRU) Peru Steyskal, 1982 (Martius) (FRU) 2010 Mexico Pouteria torta Sapotaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Neosilba Allogoptera Arecaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, (Martius) (FRU) 2010 morphotype leucocalyx (Drude) 2010 MSP1 (FRU) Neosilba inesperata T. catappa (FRU) Combretaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Neosilba Carica papaya L. Caricaceae Brazil McAlpine & Strikis & Prado 2010 nicrocaeruela (FRU) Steyskal, 1982 (Malloch) Pouteria sp. (FRU) Sapotaceae Strikis et al., 2011 Opercunina alata Convovulaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Neosilba oaxacana ? ? Mexico McAlpine & (Hamilton) (FRU) 2010 McAlpine & Steyskal, 1982 Steyskal Strychnos Loganiaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Neosilba peltae ? ? Mexico McAlpine & pseudoquina 2010 McAlpine & Passiflora edulis Passifloraceae Brazil Steyskal, 1982 St.Hilarie (FRU) Steyskal Sims Strikis et al., 2011 Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 290 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 291

Host’s Floral Host’s Floral Buds (FLB), Buds (FLB), Species Apical Buds (AB), Plant Family Country References Species Apical Buds (AB), Plant Family Country References Fruits (FRU), or Fruits (FRU), or Pods (PO) Pods (PO) Neosilba parva Unknown Unknown Brazil Bittencourt et al., Neosilba Coffea arabica L. Rubiaceae Brazil Souza et al., 2005 (Hennig) 2006 pseudopendula (FRU) Neosilba pendula Anacardium Anacardiaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, (Korytkowski & (Bezzi) humile Saint Brazil 2010 Ojeda) Hilaire (FRU) Colombia Peña & Neosilba perezi Manohot esculenta Euphorbiaceae Brazil Lourenção et al., Annona spp. Annonaceae Venezuela Bennett , (Romero & Crantz (Apical 1996 (FRU) 1995 Ruppel) Buds) T. catappa (FRU) Combretaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Neosilba pradoi Inga laurina Fabaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, 2010 Strikis & Lerena (Swartz) (PO) 2010 Opercunina alata Convovulaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, (FRU) 2010 Neosilba zadolicha Anacardium Anacardiaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, McAlpine & humile Saint Colombia 2010 Andira cuyabensis Fabaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Steyskal Hilaire (FRU) McAlpine & Benthan (FRU) 2010 Steyskal, 1982 Banara arguta Flacourtiaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Anacardium Anacardiaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Briquel (FRU) 2010 othonianum 2010 Inga laurina Fabaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Rizzini (FRU) (Swartz) (PO) 2010 Ficus insipida Moraceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Spondia dulcis Anacardiaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, (FRU) 2010 Parkinson 2010 (FRU) Psidium Myrtaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, cattleianum (FRU) 2010 Annona crassiflora Annonaceae Brazil Strikis et al., 2011 Schoepfia sp. Olacaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Martius (FRU) 2010 (FRU) Citrus jambhiri Rutaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Annona Annonaceae Brazil Strikis et al., 2011 (FRU) 2010 muricata L. ( FRU) Chrysophyllum Sapotaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, soboliferum 2010 Rollinia mucosa Annonaceae Brazil Strikis et al., 2011 Rizzini (FRU) (Jacq.) Pouteria ramiflora Sapotaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, (FRU) (FRU) 2010 Hancornia speciosa Apocynaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Pouteria torta Sapotaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Gomez 2010 (FRU) 2010 (FRU) Coffea arabica L. Rubiaceae Brazil Souza et al., 2005 Licania tomentosa Chrysobalanaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, (FRU) Fritsch 2010 Psittacanthus Loranthaceae Brazil Caires et al., 2009 (FRU) acinarius Buchenavia sp. Combretaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, (Martius) (FRU) (FRU) 2010 Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 290 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 291

Host’s Floral Host’s Floral Buds (FLB), Buds (FLB), Species Apical Buds (AB), Plant Family Country References Species Apical Buds (AB), Plant Family Country References Fruits (FRU), or Fruits (FRU), or Pods (PO) Pods (PO) Neosilba parva Unknown Unknown Brazil Bittencourt et al., Neosilba Coffea arabica L. Rubiaceae Brazil Souza et al., 2005 (Hennig) 2006 pseudopendula (FRU) Neosilba pendula Anacardium Anacardiaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, (Korytkowski & (Bezzi) humile Saint Brazil 2010 Ojeda) Hilaire (FRU) Colombia Peña & Neosilba perezi Manohot esculenta Euphorbiaceae Brazil Lourenção et al., Annona spp. Annonaceae Venezuela Bennett , (Romero & Crantz (Apical 1996 (FRU) 1995 Ruppel) Buds) T. catappa (FRU) Combretaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Neosilba pradoi Inga laurina Fabaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, 2010 Strikis & Lerena (Swartz) (PO) 2010 Opercunina alata Convovulaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, (FRU) 2010 Neosilba zadolicha Anacardium Anacardiaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, McAlpine & humile Saint Colombia 2010 Andira cuyabensis Fabaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Steyskal Hilaire (FRU) McAlpine & Benthan (FRU) 2010 Steyskal, 1982 Banara arguta Flacourtiaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Anacardium Anacardiaceae Brazil & Nicácio, Briquel (FRU) 2010 Uchoa othonianum 2010 Inga laurina Fabaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Rizzini (FRU) (Swartz) (PO) 2010 Ficus insipida Moraceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Spondia dulcis Anacardiaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, (FRU) 2010 Parkinson 2010 Psidium Myrtaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, (FRU) cattleianum (FRU) 2010 Annona crassiflora Annonaceae Brazil Strikis et al., 2011 Schoepfia sp. Olacaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Martius (FRU) 2010 (FRU) Citrus jambhiri Rutaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Annona Annonaceae Brazil Strikis et al., 2011 (FRU) 2010 muricata L. ( Chrysophyllum Sapotaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, FRU) soboliferum 2010 Rollinia mucosa Annonaceae Brazil Strikis et al., 2011 Rizzini (FRU) (Jacq.) Pouteria ramiflora Sapotaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, (FRU) (FRU) 2010 Hancornia speciosa Apocynaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Pouteria torta Sapotaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Gomez 2010 (FRU) 2010 (FRU) Coffea arabica L. Rubiaceae Brazil Souza et al., 2005 Licania tomentosa Chrysobalanaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, (FRU) Fritsch 2010 Psittacanthus Loranthaceae Brazil Caires et al., 2009 (FRU) acinarius Buchenavia sp. Combretaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, (Martius) (FRU) (FRU) 2010 Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 292 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 293

Host’s Floral Host’s Floral Buds (FLB), Buds (FLB), Species Apical Buds (AB), Plant Family Country References Species Apical Buds (AB), Plant Family Country References Fruits (FRU), or Fruits (FRU), or Pods (PO) Pods (PO) Neosilba zadolicha T. catappa Combretaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Neosilba zadolicha Tocoyena formosa Rubiaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, McAlpine & (FRU) 2010 McAlpine & (Cham. & 2010 Steyskal Steyskal Schlencht.) (FRU) Operculina alata Convovulaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Citrus jambhiri Rutaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, (FRU) 2010 (FRU) 2010 Strychnos Loganiaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Pouteria glomerata Sapotaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, pseudoquina 2010 (FRU) 2010 (FRU) Pouteria ramiflora Sapotaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Byrsonima Malpighiaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, (FRU) 2010 orbignyana A. 2010 Jussieu (FRU) Pouteria torta Sapotaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Mouriri elliptica Melastomataceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, (FRU) 2010 Martius (FRU) 2010 Physalis angulata Solanaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, (FRU) 2010 Inga Fabaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, laurina (PO) 2010 Psittacanthus Loranthaceae Brazil Caires et al., 2009 acinarius Ficus insipida Moraceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, (Martius) (FRU) (FRU) 2010 Quararibea Bombacaceae Brazil Strikis et al., 2011 Syzygium jambos Myrtaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, quianensis Aubl. (FRU) 2010 (FRU) Duckeodendron Duckeodendraceae Brazil Strikis et al., 2011 Psidium Myrtaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, cestroides Kuhlm. kennedyanum 2010 (FRU) Morong (FRU) Table 3. Species list of Lance Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea: Lonchaeidae) with economic Schoepfia sp. Olacaceae Brazil & Nicácio, Uchoa importance, and their host plants in the Neotropical Region. (FRU) 2010

Ximenia Olacaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, 11. Native parasitoids of Lonchaeidae species americana 2010 (FRU) Eight species of Eucoilinae parasitoids (Figitidae: Cynipoidea) have been associated to frugivorous larvae of Neosilba in Brazil. However, up to date, only four of these parasitoid Passiflora Passifloraceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, species were associated to their host larvae and host plant. Aganaspis nordlanderi Wharton coccinea Aublet 2010 was recovered from pupae of N. pendula (Bezzi) whose larvae were feeding in fruits of (FRU) tangerine, Citrus reticulata Blanco (Rutaceae). Lopheucoila anastrephae (Rhower) was reared Pasiflora edulis Passifloraceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, from pupae of N. batesi (Curran), obtained as larvae in Passiflora fruits (Passifloraceae), and (FRU) 2010 from N. pendula attacking orange, Citrus sinensis (L.) (Rutaceae). Odontosema anastrephae Alibertia edulis Rubiaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Borgmeier was recovered from larvae of N. pendula in fruits of Caryocar brasiliense Camb. (FRU) 2010 (Caryocaraceae), and Trybliographa infuscata Gallardo, Díaz & Uchôa was recovered from N. pendula in orange, Citrus sinensis and Caryocar brasiliense. In all the cases the species of Genipa americana Rubiaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Neosilba were collected in the larval third-instars, and only one specimen of Eucoilinae (FRU) 2010 emerged from each pupa (Tab. 4). Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 292 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 293

Host’s Floral Host’s Floral Buds (FLB), Buds (FLB), Species Apical Buds (AB), Plant Family Country References Species Apical Buds (AB), Plant Family Country References Fruits (FRU), or Fruits (FRU), or Pods (PO) Pods (PO) Neosilba zadolicha T. catappa Combretaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Neosilba zadolicha Tocoyena formosa Rubiaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, McAlpine & (FRU) 2010 McAlpine & (Cham. & 2010 Steyskal Steyskal Schlencht.) (FRU) Operculina alata Convovulaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Citrus jambhiri Rutaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, (FRU) 2010 (FRU) 2010 Strychnos Loganiaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Pouteria glomerata Sapotaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, pseudoquina 2010 (FRU) 2010 (FRU) Pouteria ramiflora Sapotaceae Brazil & Nicácio, Byrsonima Malpighiaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Uchoa (FRU) 2010 orbignyana A. 2010 Jussieu (FRU) Pouteria torta Sapotaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, Mouriri elliptica Melastomataceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, (FRU) 2010 Martius (FRU) 2010 Physalis angulata Solanaceae Brazil Uchoa & Nicácio, (FRU) 2010 Inga Fabaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, laurina (PO) 2010 Psittacanthus Loranthaceae Brazil Caires et al., 2009 acinarius Ficus insipida Moraceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, (Martius) (FRU) (FRU) 2010 Quararibea Bombacaceae Brazil Strikis et al., 2011 Syzygium jambos Myrtaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, quianensis Aubl. (FRU) 2010 (FRU) Duckeodendron Duckeodendraceae Brazil Strikis et al., 2011 Psidium Myrtaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, cestroides Kuhlm. kennedyanum 2010 (FRU) Morong (FRU) Table 3. Species list of Lance Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea: Lonchaeidae) with economic Schoepfia sp. Olacaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, importance, and their host plants in the Neotropical Region. (FRU) 2010

Ximenia Olacaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, 11. Native parasitoids of Lonchaeidae species americana 2010 (FRU) Eight species of Eucoilinae parasitoids (Figitidae: Cynipoidea) have been associated to frugivorous larvae of Neosilba in Brazil. However, up to date, only four of these parasitoid Passiflora Passifloraceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, species were associated to their host larvae and host plant. Aganaspis nordlanderi Wharton coccinea Aublet 2010 was recovered from pupae of N. pendula (Bezzi) whose larvae were feeding in fruits of (FRU) tangerine, Citrus reticulata Blanco (Rutaceae). Lopheucoila anastrephae (Rhower) was reared Pasiflora edulis Passifloraceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, from pupae of N. batesi (Curran), obtained as larvae in Passiflora fruits (Passifloraceae), and (FRU) 2010 from N. pendula attacking orange, Citrus sinensis (L.) (Rutaceae). Odontosema anastrephae Alibertia edulis Rubiaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Borgmeier was recovered from larvae of N. pendula in fruits of Caryocar brasiliense Camb. (FRU) 2010 (Caryocaraceae), and Trybliographa infuscata Gallardo, Díaz & Uchoa was recovered from N. pendula in orange, Citrus sinensis and Caryocar brasiliense. In all the cases the species of Genipa americana Rubiaceae Brazil Uchôa & Nicácio, Neosilba were collected in the larval third-instars, and only one specimen of Eucoilinae (FRU) 2010 emerged from each pupa (Tab. 4). Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 294 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 295

12. Current status and future perspectives on the control of fruit flies Currently the control of fruit fly is made with chemical pesticide spraying, a concerning reality because most tropical fruits are eaten raw, making the residue over them an environmental and human health problem. In Brazil, some farmers have reduced the impact of pesticides in orchards, spraying sugar solution on certain rows of fruit trees in the orchards, where fruit flies are attracted to the food source. So, they spray insecticides in this crowd of tephritids. This practice reduces the amount of insecticides in the environment, decreasing the risk of residues in the fruits. Several researchers in the Americas (e.g. in Brazil) are looking for powerful and specific attractants to catch fruit flies in traps. These natural chemicals can be present in the host fruits of the fruit flies. If isolated, identified and synthesized these natural attractants can be important in both cases: surveys on species diversity in natural environments, and for the management of pest species in orchards, enabling the reduction in the use of chemical insecticides. This technique in association with biological control with native parasitoids, probably, will be possible in the near future. Doryctobracon areolatus and Utetes anastrephae are good candidates for keeping population of Anastrepha species and Ceratitis capitata in low levels, making possible to produce clean fruits and vegetables.

13. Conclusions Anastrepha is the most biodiverse and economically important genus of Tephritidae in Brazil, but from the total of 112 species reported in the Country to date, only 14 species can be considered as pest or potential pests. In Brazil two very economically important tropical species of fruit flies: Anastrepha ludens (Loew) and (Loew) do not occur. In South America occur at least eight species of Braconidae parasitoids. Doryctobracon areolatus, Utetes anastrephae, and Opius bellus are the most ubiquitous and with wide distribution, being D. areolatus the best candidate for biological control programs of Anastrepha species, and maybe also, for Ceratitis capitata. There are not enough studies to know how Neosilba, and Dasiops species lay their eggs in the host plants: if endophytic, like the tephritids, or if the eggs are scattered in the target part of the host plants and the newly hatched larvae are able to penetrate in the plant tissue by them. The Lonchaeidae can occupy the same ecological niche occupied by the tephritids. In some host plants, the lonchaeids can be more abundant and important as pest that the tephritids, including some fruit species with economic importance, such as Citrus spp. (Rutaceae), Spondias dulcis Parkison (Anacardiaceae), and species of Passiflora (Passifloraceae). The Lonchaeidae have, at least, eight species of Eucoilinae (Figitidae) parasitoids in Brazil, but the biology of both groups (lonchaeids and its parasitoids) is unknown. Lopheucoila anastrephae, Trybliographa infuscata and Aganaspis nordlanderi, have been the most abundant and frequent parasitoids in larvae of third-instars of Neosilba species in Citrus orchards in Brazil.

14. Research needs Table 4. Trophic interactions between parasitoids, lonchaeid fruit flies, and host plants in For solving some bottlenecks to enable the monitoring and control of fruit flies with non- South America. polluting methods, the following topics are specially in need of researches: regional surveys

Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 294 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 295

12. Current status and future perspectives on the control of fruit flies Currently the control of fruit fly is made with chemical pesticide spraying, a concerning reality because most tropical fruits are eaten raw, making the residue over them an environmental and human health problem. In Brazil, some farmers have reduced the impact of pesticides in orchards, spraying sugar solution on certain rows of fruit trees in the orchards, where fruit flies are attracted to the food source. So, they spray insecticides in this crowd of tephritids. This practice reduces the amount of insecticides in the environment, decreasing the risk of residues in the fruits. Several researchers in the Americas (e.g. in Brazil) are looking for powerful and specific attractants to catch fruit flies in traps. These natural chemicals can be present in the host fruits of the fruit flies. If isolated, identified and synthesized these natural attractants can be important in both cases: surveys on species diversity in natural environments, and for the management of pest species in orchards, enabling the reduction in the use of chemical insecticides. This technique in association with biological control with native parasitoids, probably, will be possible in the near future. Doryctobracon areolatus and Utetes anastrephae are good candidates for keeping population of Anastrepha species and Ceratitis capitata in low levels, making possible to produce clean fruits and vegetables.

13. Conclusions Anastrepha is the most biodiverse and economically important genus of Tephritidae in Brazil, but from the total of 112 species reported in the Country to date, only 14 species can be considered as pest or potential pests. In Brazil two very economically important tropical species of fruit flies: Anastrepha ludens (Loew) and Anastrepha suspensa (Loew) do not occur. In South America occur at least eight species of Braconidae parasitoids. Doryctobracon areolatus, Utetes anastrephae, and Opius bellus are the most ubiquitous and with wide distribution, being D. areolatus the best candidate for biological control programs of Anastrepha species, and maybe also, for Ceratitis capitata. There are not enough studies to know how Neosilba, and Dasiops species lay their eggs in the host plants: if endophytic, like the tephritids, or if the eggs are scattered in the target part of the host plants and the newly hatched larvae are able to penetrate in the plant tissue by them. The Lonchaeidae can occupy the same ecological niche occupied by the tephritids. In some host plants, the lonchaeids can be more abundant and important as pest that the tephritids, including some fruit species with economic importance, such as Citrus spp. (Rutaceae), Spondias dulcis Parkison (Anacardiaceae), and species of Passiflora (Passifloraceae). The Lonchaeidae have, at least, eight species of Eucoilinae (Figitidae) parasitoids in Brazil, but the biology of both groups (lonchaeids and its parasitoids) is unknown. Lopheucoila anastrephae, Trybliographa infuscata and Aganaspis nordlanderi, have been the most abundant and frequent parasitoids in larvae of third-instars of Neosilba species in Citrus orchards in Brazil.

14. Research needs Table 4. Trophic interactions between parasitoids, lonchaeid fruit flies, and host plants in For solving some bottlenecks to enable the monitoring and control of fruit flies with non- South America. polluting methods, the following topics are specially in need of researches: regional surveys

Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 296 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 297 about species diversity; prospecting for more specific attractants to use in traps; developing Costa, S.G.M.; Querino, R.B.; Ronchi-Teles, B.; Penteado-Dias, A.M.M . & Zucchi, R.A. 2009. of artificial diets to rearing larvae of Tephritoidea to multiply their parasitoids; Parasitoid diversity (Hymenoptera: Braconidae and Figitidae) on frugivorous improvement of mass rearing methods to both: fruit flies and their parasitoids; studies on larvae (Diptera: Tephritidae and Lonchaeidae) at AdolphoDucke Forest Reserve, tritrophic relationship with their host plants and parasitoids; basic biology, and behavior. Central Amazon Region, Manaus, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 69 (2): 363-37 IBRAF-Instituto Brasileiro de Frutas. 2009. www.ibreaf.org.br/estatisticas/ Exportação/ Comparativo_das_Exportações_Brasileiras_de_Frutas_frescas_2010-2009.pdf 15. References

Leblanc, L.; Vargas, R.I. & Rubinoff, D. 2010. Capture of pest fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae Palenchar, J.; Holler, T.; Moses-Rowley, A.; Mcgovern, R. & Sivinski, J. 2009. Evaluation of and nontarget insects in biolure and torula yeast traps in Hawaii. Envoronmental irradiated caribean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) larvae for laboratory rearing of Entomology 39 (5): 1626-1630. Doryctobracon areolatus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Florida Entomologist 92 (4): Lourenção, A.L.; Lorenzi, J.O. & Ambrosano, G.M.B. 1996. Comprtamento de clones de 535-537. mandioca em relação a infestação por Neosilba perezi (Romero & Ruppell) (Diptera: Peña, J.E. & Bennett, F.D. 1995. associated with Annona spp. in the Tropics. Lonchaeidae). Sciencia Agricola 53 (2-3): 304-308. Florida Entomologist 78 (2): 329-349. Macgowan, I. & Freidberg, A. 2008.The Lonchaeidae (Diptera) of Israel, with descriptions of Peñaranda, A.; Ulloa, P.C. & Hernández, M.R. 1986. Biología de la mosca de los botones three new species. Israel Journal of Entomology 38 (1): 61-92. florales del maracuyá Dasiops inedulis (Diptera: Lonchaeidae) en el Valle del Cauca. Marinho, C.F.; Souza-Filho, M.F.; Raga, A. & Zucchi, R.A. 2009. Parasitóides (Hymenoptera: Revista Colombiana de Entomologia 12 (1): 16-22. Braconidae) de moscas-das-frutas (Diptera: Tephritidae) no estado de São Paulo: Perdomo, A.J.; Baranowski, R.M. & Nation, J.L. 1975. Recapture of virgin female caribbean plantas associadas e parasitismo. Neotropical Entomology 38 (3): 321-326. fruit flies from traps baited with males. Florida Entomologist 58 (4): 291-295. McAlpine, J.F. 1961. A new species of Dasiops (Diptera: Lonchaeidae) injurious to apricots. Perdomo, A.J.; Nation, J.L. & Baranowski, R.M. 1976. Attraction of Female and Male Canadian Entomologist 93 (7): 539-544. Caribben Fruit Flies to food-baited and male-baited traps under field conditions. McAlpine, J.F. & Steyskal, G.C. 1982. A revision of Neosilba McAlpine with a key to the Environmental Entomology 5 (6): 1208-1210. world genera of Lonchaeidae (Diptera). Canadian Entomologist 114 (2): 105-137. Ramírez, C.C.; Salazar, M.; Palma, R.E.; Cordeiro, C. & Meza-Basso, L. 2008. Missirian, G.L.B.; Uchoa, M.A. & Fischer, E. 2006. Development of Myrmeleon brasiliensis Phylogeographical analysis of Neotropical Rhagoletis (Diptera: Tephritidae): did the (Navás) (Neuroptera, Myrmeleontidae) in laboratory with different natural diets. uplift contribute to current morphological differences? Neotropica Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 23 (4): 1044-1050. Entomology, 37 (6): 651-661. Nicácio, J.N. & Uchoa, M.A. 2011. Diversity of frugivorous flies (Diptera: Tephritidae and Reyes, J.; Carro, X.; Hernández, J.; Mendez, W.; Campos, C.; Esquivel, H.; Salgado, E. & Lonchaeidae) and their relationship with host plants (Angiospermae) in Enkerlin, W. 2007. A multi-institutional approach to create fruit fly-low prevalence environments of South Pantanal Region, Brazil. Florida Entomologist 94 (3): 443- and fly-free areas in Central America. pp. 627-640. In: Vreysen, M.J. B; Robinson, A. 466. S. & Hendrichs, J. (eds.). Area-Wide Control of Insect Pests. IEA. Vienna, Austria. Nicácio, J.N.: Uchoa, M.A.; Faccenda, O.; Guimarães, J.A. & Marinho. C.F. 2011. Native 792p. ISBN 978-90481-7521-5. larval parasitoids (Hymenoptera) of frugivorous Tephritoidea (Diptera) in South Salazar, M. Theoduloz, C., Vega A., Poblete, F., González, E., Badilla, R.& Meza-Basso, L. Pantanal Region, Brazil. Florida Entomologist 94 (3): 407-419. 2002. PCR–RFLP identication of endemic Chilean species of Rhagoletis (Diptera: Norrbom, A.L. 2010. Tephritidae (Fruit Flies, Moscas de Frutas). pp. 909-954. In Brown, B.V.; Tephritidae) attacking Solanaceae. Bulletin of Entomological Research 92 (4): 337- Borkent, A.; Cumming, J.M.; Wood, D.M.; Woodley, N.E. & Zumbado, M.A. (eds.). 341. Manual of Central American Diptera. NRC-CNRC Research Press. Ottawa. 1,442p. Salles, L.A. 2000. Biologia e ciclo de vida de Anastrepha fraterculus (Wied.), pp.81-86. In: ISSB 978-0-660-19958-0 Malavasi, A. & Zucchi, R. A. (eds). Moscas-das-frutas de importância econômica no Brasil: Norrbom, A.L. & McAlpine, J.F.1997. A review of Neotropical species of Dasiops Rondani Conhecimento básico e aplicado. Holos. Ribeirão Preto. 327p. ISNB 85-86699-13-6 (Diptera: Lonchaeidae) attacking Passiflora (Passifloraceae). Memories of the Souza, S.A.S; Resende, A.L.S; Strikis, P.C; Costa, J.R; Ricci, M.S.F; Aguiar-Menezes, E.L. Entomological Society of Washington 18 (1): 189-211. 2005. Infestação natural de moscas frugívoras (Diptera: Tephritoidea) em café Norrbom, A.L. & Uchoa, M.A. 2011. New species and records of Anastrepha (Diptera: arábica sob cultivo orgânico arborizado e a pleno sol, em Valença, RJ. Neotropical Tephritidae) from Brazil. Zootaxa 2835: 61-67. Entomology 34 (4): 639-648 Oliveira, M.R.V., Paula-Moraes, S.V. & Lopes, F.P.P. 2006. Moscas-das-frutas (Diptera: Steyskal, G.C. 1980. Two-winged flies of the genus Dasiops (Diptera: Lonchaeidae) attacking Tephritidae) com potencial quarentenário para o Brasil. EMBRAPA, Brasília. 261p. flowers or fruits of species of Passiflora (passion fruit, granadilla, curuba, etc.). ISBN 978-85-87697-39-4 Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 82 (2): 166-170. Ovruski, S.M., Schliserman, P., & Aluja, M. 2003. Native and introduced host plants of Silva, J.G. , Dutra, V.S., Santos, M.S., Silva, N.M.O., Vidal, D.B., Nink, R.A., Guimarães, J.A. Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Northwestern & Araújo, E.L. 2010. Diversity of Anastrepha spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Argentina. Journal of Economic Entomology 96 (4): 1108-1118. associated braconid parasitoids from native and exotic hosts in Southern Bahia, Ovruski, S.M., Schliserman, P., Nunez-Campero, S.R., Orono, L.E., Bezdjian, L.B., Albornoz- Brazil. Environmental Entomology 39 (5): 1457-1465. Medina, P. & Van Nieuwenhove, G.A. 2009. A survey of Hymenoptereous larval- Strikis, P.C. & Lerena, M.L.M. 2009. A new species of Neosilba (Diptera: Lonchaeidae) from pupal parasitoids associated with Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata Brazil. Iheringia Série Zoologia 99 (3): 273-275. (Diptera: Tephritidae) infesting wild guava (Psidium guajava) and peach (Prunus Strikis, P.C. & Prado, A.P. 2009. Lonchaeidae associados a frutos de nêspera, Eryobotria persicae) in the Southernmost section of the Bolivian Yungas forest. Florida japonica (Thunb.) Lindley (Rosaceae), com a descrição de uma espécie nova de Entomologist 92 (2): 269-275. Neosilba (Diptera: Tephritoidea). Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 76 (1): 49-54. Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea): 298 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics Biology, Host Plants, Natural Enemies, and the Implications to Their Natural Control 299

Leblanc, L.; Vargas, R.I. & Rubinoff, D. 2010. Capture of pest fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae Palenchar, J.; Holler, T.; Moses-Rowley, A.; Mcgovern, R. & Sivinski, J. 2009. Evaluation of and nontarget insects in biolure and torula yeast traps in Hawaii. Envoronmental irradiated caribean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) larvae for laboratory rearing of Entomology 39 (5): 1626-1630. Doryctobracon areolatus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Florida Entomologist 92 (4): Lourenção, A.L.; Lorenzi, J.O. & Ambrosano, G.M.B. 1996. Comprtamento de clones de 535-537. mandioca em relação a infestação por Neosilba perezi (Romero & Ruppell) (Diptera: Peña, J.E. & Bennett, F.D. 1995. Arthropods associated with Annona spp. in the Tropics. Lonchaeidae). Sciencia Agricola 53 (2-3): 304-308. Florida Entomologist 78 (2): 329-349. Macgowan, I. & Freidberg, A. 2008.The Lonchaeidae (Diptera) of Israel, with descriptions of Peñaranda, A.; Ulloa, P.C. & Hernández, M.R. 1986. Biología de la mosca de los botones three new species. Israel Journal of Entomology 38 (1): 61-92. florales del maracuyá Dasiops inedulis (Diptera: Lonchaeidae) en el Valle del Cauca. Marinho, C.F.; Souza-Filho, M.F.; Raga, A. & Zucchi, R.A. 2009. Parasitóides (Hymenoptera: Revista Colombiana de Entomologia 12 (1): 16-22. Braconidae) de moscas-das-frutas (Diptera: Tephritidae) no estado de São Paulo: Perdomo, A.J.; Baranowski, R.M. & Nation, J.L. 1975. Recapture of virgin female caribbean plantas associadas e parasitismo. Neotropical Entomology 38 (3): 321-326. fruit flies from traps baited with males. Florida Entomologist 58 (4): 291-295. McAlpine, J.F. 1961. A new species of Dasiops (Diptera: Lonchaeidae) injurious to apricots. Perdomo, A.J.; Nation, J.L. & Baranowski, R.M. 1976. Attraction of Female and Male Canadian Entomologist 93 (7): 539-544. Caribben Fruit Flies to food-baited and male-baited traps under field conditions. McAlpine, J.F. & Steyskal, G.C. 1982. A revision of Neosilba McAlpine with a key to the Environmental Entomology 5 (6): 1208-1210. world genera of Lonchaeidae (Diptera). Canadian Entomologist 114 (2): 105-137. Ramírez, C.C.; Salazar, M.; Palma, R.E.; Cordeiro, C. & Meza-Basso, L. 2008. Missirian, G.L.B.; Uchôa, M.A. & Fischer, E. 2006. Development of Myrmeleon brasiliensis Phylogeographical analysis of Neotropical Rhagoletis (Diptera: Tephritidae): did the (Navás) (Neuroptera, Myrmeleontidae) in laboratory with different natural diets. Andes uplift contribute to current morphological differences? Neotropica Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 23 (4): 1044-1050. Entomology, 37 (6): 651-661. Nicácio, J.N. & Uchôa, M.A. 2011. Diversity of frugivorous flies (Diptera: Tephritidae and Reyes, J.; Carro, X.; Hernández, J.; Mendez, W.; Campos, C.; Esquivel, H.; Salgado, E. & Lonchaeidae) and their relationship with host plants (Angiospermae) in Enkerlin, W. 2007. A multi-institutional approach to create fruit fly-low prevalence environments of South Pantanal Region, Brazil. Florida Entomologist 94 (3): 443- and fly-free areas in Central America. pp. 627-640. In: Vreysen, M.J. B; Robinson, A. 466. S. & Hendrichs, J. (eds.). Area-Wide Control of Insect Pests. IEA. Vienna, Austria. Nicácio, J.N.: Uchôa, M.A.; Faccenda, O.; Guimarães, J.A. & Marinho. C.F. 2011. Native 792p. ISBN 978-90481-7521-5. larval parasitoids (Hymenoptera) of frugivorous Tephritoidea (Diptera) in South Salazar, M. Theoduloz, C., Vega A., Poblete, F., González, E., Badilla, R.& Meza-Basso, L. Pantanal Region, Brazil. Florida Entomologist 94 (3): 407-419. 2002. PCR–RFLP identication of endemic Chilean species of Rhagoletis (Diptera: Norrbom, A.L. 2010. Tephritidae (Fruit Flies, Moscas de Frutas). pp. 909-954. In Brown, B.V.; Tephritidae) attacking Solanaceae. Bulletin of Entomological Research 92 (4): 337- Borkent, A.; Cumming, J.M.; Wood, D.M.; Woodley, N.E. & Zumbado, M.A. (eds.). 341. Manual of Central American Diptera. NRC-CNRC Research Press. Ottawa. 1,442p. Salles, L.A. 2000. Biologia e ciclo de vida de Anastrepha fraterculus (Wied.), pp.81-86. In: ISSB 978-0-660-19958-0 Malavasi, A. & Zucchi, R. A. (eds). Moscas-das-frutas de importância econômica no Brasil: Norrbom, A.L. & McAlpine, J.F.1997. A review of Neotropical species of Dasiops Rondani Conhecimento básico e aplicado. Holos. Ribeirão Preto. 327p. ISNB 85-86699-13-6 (Diptera: Lonchaeidae) attacking Passiflora (Passifloraceae). Memories of the Souza, S.A.S; Resende, A.L.S; Strikis, P.C; Costa, J.R; Ricci, M.S.F; Aguiar-Menezes, E.L. Entomological Society of Washington 18 (1): 189-211. 2005. Infestação natural de moscas frugívoras (Diptera: Tephritoidea) em café Norrbom, A.L. & Uchôa, M.A. 2011. New species and records of Anastrepha (Diptera: arábica sob cultivo orgânico arborizado e a pleno sol, em Valença, RJ. Neotropical Tephritidae) from Brazil. Zootaxa 2835: 61-67. Entomology 34 (4): 639-648 Oliveira, M.R.V., Paula-Moraes, S.V. & Lopes, F.P.P. 2006. Moscas-das-frutas (Diptera: Steyskal, G.C. 1980. Two-winged flies of the genus Dasiops (Diptera: Lonchaeidae) attacking Tephritidae) com potencial quarentenário para o Brasil. EMBRAPA, Brasília. 261p. flowers or fruits of species of Passiflora (passion fruit, granadilla, curuba, etc.). ISBN 978-85-87697-39-4 Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 82 (2): 166-170. Ovruski, S.M., Schliserman, P., & Aluja, M. 2003. Native and introduced host plants of Silva, J.G. , Dutra, V.S., Santos, M.S., Silva, N.M.O., Vidal, D.B., Nink, R.A., Guimarães, J.A. Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Northwestern & Araújo, E.L. 2010. Diversity of Anastrepha spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Argentina. Journal of Economic Entomology 96 (4): 1108-1118. associated braconid parasitoids from native and exotic hosts in Southern Bahia, Ovruski, S.M., Schliserman, P., Nunez-Campero, S.R., Orono, L.E., Bezdjian, L.B., Albornoz- Brazil. Environmental Entomology 39 (5): 1457-1465. Medina, P. & Van Nieuwenhove, G.A. 2009. A survey of Hymenoptereous larval- Strikis, P.C. & Lerena, M.L.M. 2009. A new species of Neosilba (Diptera: Lonchaeidae) from pupal parasitoids associated with Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata Brazil. Iheringia Série Zoologia 99 (3): 273-275. (Diptera: Tephritidae) infesting wild guava (Psidium guajava) and peach (Prunus Strikis, P.C. & Prado, A.P. 2009. Lonchaeidae associados a frutos de nêspera, Eryobotria persicae) in the Southernmost section of the Bolivian Yungas forest. Florida japonica (Thunb.) Lindley (Rosaceae), com a descrição de uma espécie nova de Entomologist 92 (2): 269-275. Neosilba (Diptera: Tephritoidea). Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 76 (1): 49-54.

300 Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics

Strikis, P.C., De Deus, E.G., Silva, R.A., Pereira, J.D.B., Jesus, C.R. & Massaro-Júnior, A.L. 2011. Conhecimento sobre Lonchaeidae na Amazônia brasileira. In: Silva, R.A., 13 Lemos, W.P. & Zucchi, R. A. (eds.). Moscas-das-frutas na Amazônia Brasileira: diversidade, hospedeiros e inimigos naturais. Embrapa. Macapá, 299p. ISBN 978-85- 61366-02-5 Trostle, M., Carrejo, N.S., Mercado, I. & Wharton, R.A. 1999. Two new species of Phaenocarpa From Chemicals to IPM Foerst (Hymenoptera: Alysiinae) from South America. Proceedings of the Against the Mediterranean Fruit Fly Entomological Society of Washington 101 (1): 197-207. Uchoa, M.A.; Nicácio, J.N. & Bomfim, D.A. 2004. Biodiversidade de moscas-das-frutas Ceratitis capitata (Diptera, Tephritidae) (Diptera: Tephritidae) e seus hospedeiros no Brasil Central. In: XX Congresso Brasileiro de Entomologia, Resumos, p.155, 2004, Sociedade Entomológica do Synda Boulahia Kheder, Imen Trabelsi and Nawel Aouadi Brasil, Gramado-RS, Brazil. National Agronomic Institute of Tunisia, Uchoa, M.A. & Nicácio, J.N. 2010. New records of Neotropical fruit flies (Tephritidae), lance Entomology Ecology Lab, Cité Mahrajène, Tunis flies (Lonchaeidae) (Diptera: Tephritoidea), and their host plants in the South Tunisia Pantanal and adjacent areas, Brazil. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 103 (5): 723-733. Uchoa, M.A. & Zucchi, R.A. 1999. Metodología de colecta de Tephritidade y Lonchaeidae 1. Introduction frugívoros (Diptera: Tephritoidea) y sus parasitoides (Hymenoptera). Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil 28 (4): 601-610. In Tunisia, the Citrus culture is important especially in the region of Cap-bon that is located in the North-eastern tip of Tunisia, and which is the main production area with about 15300 Uchoa, M.A.; Oliveira, I.; Molina, R.M.S. & Zucchi, R.A. 2002. Species diversity of frugivorous flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea) from hosts in the cerrado of the state of ha. In this region, the main source of income of approximately 25 000 rural households comes from Citrus farms, although most farmers have small orchards less than 5 ha (Zekri Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Neotropical Entomology 31 (4): 515-524. and Laajimi, 2000). The Citrus production reached during the campaign 2010/2011 an Uchoa, M.A.; Molina, R.M.S.; Oliveira, I.; Zucchi, R.A.; Canal N.A. & Díaz, N.B. 2003. Larval average of 354 000 T. The production of the oranges Maltaise that is the main variety, is endoparasitoids (Hyemnoptera) of frugivorous flies (Diptera, Tephritoidea) reared about 50% of the total production. The other varieties most cultivated are the oranges from fruits of the cerrado of the State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Revista Thomson, the clementines, the lemons, then the oranges Meski and Valencia late. Most of Brasilieira de Entomologia 47 (2): 181-186. the production (80-90%) is sold in the local market, providing it in fresh fruits for up to 6 Uramoto, K.; Martins, D.S. & Zucchi, R.A. 2008. Fruit flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) and their months per year. Some varieties and particularly the oranges Maltaise, are annually exported associations with native host plants in a remnant area of the highly endangered mainly to European Union with an average of about 23 000 T (Jemmazi, 2011 pers. com.). Atlantic Rain Forest in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil. Bulletin of Entomological Research 98 (5): 457-466. However, the productivity of Citrus orchards is still below the desired level because the sub- Virgilio, M.; Backeljau, T.; Barr, N. & De Meyer, M. 2008. Molecular evaluation of nominal sector is exposed to several constraints, such as the aging plantations, the climatic species in the Ceratitis fasciventris, C. anonae, C. rosa complex (Diptera: Tephritidae). conditions, the availability of water and the problems of diseases and pests. Among these, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 48 (1): 270-280. the Mediterranean fruit fly is the most important pest, as Citrus leafminer, aphids, scales, Vitti, A. 2009. Analise da competitividade das exportações brasileiras de frutas selecionadas mites and thrips recently (Jerraya, 2003; Trabelsi and Boulahia Kheder, 2010). no mercado internacional. Economia aplicada, ESALQ-Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba. MSc Thesis, 105p. 2. Current situation of the control of the medfly Zucchi, R.A. 2008. Fruit flies in Brazil - Anastrepha species their host plants and parasitoids. Available in: www.lea.esalq.usp.br/anastrepha/, updated on May 04, 2011. The mediterraneean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata is a harmful pest of many summer fruits and . Citrus. The control of this pest is mainly chemical by terrestrial or airlift ways. These White, I. M. & Elson-Harris, M.M.1994. Fruit Flies of economic significance: their treatments using particularly Malathion, concern an area of about 10 000 ha in the region of Identification and Bionomics. CAB International-ACIAR. Wallingford, UK. 601p. Cap-bon. The treatments are made by the national company “SONAPROV” specialized in ISBN 0-851198 -790-7 treatments, following the instructions of the Ministry of Agriculture. When the medfly populations tend upwards and their level reached the thresholds of 2-3 medflies/trap/day, the treatments were made. Thus, the treatments begin from September and are repeated until November totalizing an average of 6 passages. The farmers also made several chemical treatments on Citrus, up to 10 times, with very toxic Organophosphates, especially Malathion + Lysatex (food attractant) and Dimethoate. The biological products such as