Hatchment Appeal St Leonards, Deal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hatchment Appeal St Leonards, Deal Hatchment Appeal St Leonards, Deal Contents 3 Background 4 The project 5 The Hatchments and other items • Man O’ War 1705 7 What is a Hatchment? 8 What work needs doing? 10 Descriptions of the Hatchments 14 Queen Anne Arms 15 Bulstrode Board 17 Scripture and benefaction boards 18 The History of the people commemorated by the Hatchments and other memorials The Appeal and project are being run by “The Friends of St Leonards, Deal” on behalf of the church. Contact details: Email: [email protected] Website: www.stleonardsdeal.co.uk Donations should be made payable to: “St Leonards P.C.C” and can be sent to: Steve Goodsell 13 Downs Close East Studdal CT15 5 BY 2 Background There has been a church on the current site since at least 1180 and evidence has been found to suggest an earlier building stood on the site during the Saxon period. Although the towns development over the years has left St Leonards standing on the outskirts, it still remains the Parish Church for Deal. As Deal has grown in size, so has the church, leaving the present building a cocktail of various architectural styles, including many important features from all periods. It has developed in a manner which lead one Bishop to call it "The most cockeyed church in Christendom" It is well worth a visit to discover exactly what he meant! It is not only the building itself that is of historic interest. The church also contains many important artefacts from past generations which are of great local and national interest because they echo the part the church has played in Deals history and also the part Deal played in the proud Naval tradition of Britain. It is evident that over the years the town and church have been justifiably proud of their place in the life of the country and preserved the many reminders of the importance of Deal. It was in order to continue this stewardship of our historical inheritance, that the “Friends of St Leonards” or “FOSL’s” was established in 2007 with the specific aim of raising funds to help maintain and improve the fabric of the building and also those items of historic importance it contains. The group is independent of the church, while of course working closely with it, and its membership is open to all irrespective their religious beliefs. Soon after FOSL’s formation, the collection of Hatchments and other artworks within the church were identified as being of local and national significance and in need of urgent restoration. To this end, last year the Friends organised a comprehensive professional assessment of their condition and now at the request of the church , are organising an appeal to raise the necessary funding to have this work carried out. 3 The Project The main aim of the project is to conserve the fine collection of art works for future generations to enjoy. We also want to raise awareness locally and nationally of the importance of the collection and increase the current knowledge about the people and events commemorated, with emphasis on how this relates to the story of Deal’s place in our maritime history. We will achieve this by making the collection and the information more accessible to the public both during and after the project. During the fundraising we intend to start achieving this by: • Holding open days with emphasis on the collection • Creating a website • Making maximum contact with the various news media • Holding talks about the collection • Researching the history of the people and events behind the objects • Developing links with local Schools, Colleges and Universities to enable them to participate in the research and conservation • Involving the public and local history and art societies in the work • Starting a record of the project with the aim of producing a lasting record of the work undertaken. Once the conservation is underway, we intend to continue with all the above and also provide the opportunity for people to see the conservation in progress, by arranging for some of the work to be carried out in-situ and also organising visits to the restorers studios wherever possible. Once the conservation is complete, we intend to produce a publication which will fully document the collection and its conservation. Along side this we intend to maintain the website and continue to hold organised open days to ensure that the work carried out is discovered and appreciated by as many people as possible. We would also hope that links made with the local community during the project will continue to flourish and that together we can move on to record more of the history of the church building itself, with the aim of eventually producing a comprehensive record of its history, architectural development and all the artefacts it contains. 4 The Hatchments and other items The collection of sixteen Hatchments in St Leonards is one of the finest in Britain and spans a period between 1673 and 1865 and contains good examples of the changing fashions in their design over the years. We are lucky they have survived - in many churches they have been removed when repairs to the church were required, never been replaced and have now disappeared! This is a shame as they are not only decorative, but also contain much of interest to local historians, genealogists and those interested in heraldry. In many cases the paintings directly reflect Deal’s maritime history, commemorating admirals, captains, deaths at sea and even the commander of a ship, the Amsterdam, from one of Britain’s great naval rivals, the Dutch. Ships appear as crests and sailors as supporters, reminding the viewer of the deceased’s naval connections. The Deal shipyards may also have an indirect link with these paintings, as some of the panels and canvases may have been made from off-cuts of sail canvas and wooden planking, cheap and easily available to local heraldic painters. The church is also lucky in having many other wall hangings and panels of note, including early examples of both carved and painted Royal Arms boards, a large monumental board thought to be unique in its design and a 1705 painting of a Man O’ War commemorating the Great Storm of 1703 in which thirteen ships on their way back from the war of Spanish Succession, were wrecked on the Goodwin Sands and 1200 souls lost. 5 6 What is a Hatchment? Hatchments came into use in the early 17th century and originated in the Low Countries. They started as a replacement for the medieval achievement (the carrying of the shield, helm and other accoutrements) at funerals of knights and other nobles. It was customary in this country for the hatchment to be carried in front of the funeral procession, hung outside the home during mourning (usually a year and a day) and then to be placed in the church where burial had taken place. The practice was commonplace into early Victorian times but now has become almost obsolete, although some Oxford colleges still follow the practice. The most recent I am aware of in Kent is that of Sir Arthur Luxmoore in the church at Bilsington dated 1944. Over time memorial plaques of similar design were produced and some would say these were not "genuine" hatchments, but it is not always easy to differentiate between those produced for the funeral and those some time later purely as memorials. On the previous page, is a series of illustrations which show how the make up of the arms and the background colour to the hatchment is of great significance and enables even a casual observer to tell the marital status of the deceased. • Single people had only one coat of arms on the hatchment and the background colour was all black. • Where a male death, a helm surmounts the arms. For a female death it is either a ribbon or left unadorned • Where married, both parties arms are shown. Male are always on the left, and the surviving partners are on a light background. For the second death the whole background is again black. • Where more than one marriage has occurred, previous spouses can be shown in various ways (see1, 2, 3 and 4) • I believe the example for a Bishop (showing mitre and stole) to be incorrect, in that the colours of the halves should be reversed if he is pre-deceasing his wife or both parts should be black if his is the second death. • The example for the Peer shows the extra adornments by way of supporting animals and crown that went with rank. 7 What work needs doing? The amount of work required varies between the different items. Some need only a thorough clean and their fixings renewed. Others are on the point of no return if nothing is done. The book Hatchments in Britain vol. 5 by Peter Summers says of the hatchment for Admiral Sir John Harvey and also that for Lady Sarah Drake, that in 1975 they were almost indecipherable. These two will be lost forever if action is not taken very soon. The survey commissioned last year says of Admiral Harvey’s “ The support is a very degraded canvas with extensive paint loss exposing areas of bare canvas, which are very dark, probably as a result of oxidation over a long period”. And of Lady Sarah Drake’s “The painting is the most severely damaged hatchment in the church. The support is a very degraded canvas with extensive paint loss and, massive surface deformation.” 8 Some of the boards on which the paintings have been executed are in need of attention – The Hatchment for Scrivens has woodworm (right) as do several others including that for Poulton (see below) Without treatment eventually the Boards will crumble and we will have lost our heritage.
Recommended publications
  • School Plan for Student Achievement Template
    School Year: 2020-21 SPSA Title Page School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Template Instructions and requirements for completing the SPSA template may be found in the SPSA Template Instructions. County-District-School Schoolsite Council Local Board Approval School Name (CDS) Code (SSC) Approval Date Date Deer Canyon 37682966109300 11/18/20 Elementary School School Vision and Mission Deer Canyon Elementary School Mission Statement Our mission is to ensure all of our students develop a love of learning and become highly successful in school, society, and the work place. Through close collaboration, and in partnership with our families and community, we will provide challenging, real life learning opportunities to prepare our students for success in a diverse society and ever-changing world. We will model what we expect so our children become: Self Directed Learners• Collaborative Team Members• Clear Communicators• Constructive Thinkers and Persevering Problem Solvers• Effective Users of Tools and Technology• Responsible and Kind Members of Society Deer Canyon Elementary Vision It is our vision that Deer Canyon becomes a school where all students have the individual support, encouragement and opportunity they need to achieve academically at very high levels and to develop the personal habits and values that will allow them to be successful both in school and as productive members of our society. Deer Canyon Culture The staff and parents of Deer Canyon encourage students to be intrinsically motivated and ensure that our students develop a love of learning. We embed habits for future success through the explicit development of skills such as critical thinking, self-monitoring, persistence, and responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan for Muskellunge in Michigan
    ATUR F N AL O R T E N S E O U M R T C R E A STATE OF MICHIGAN S P E DNR D MI N DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CHIGA FR12 March 2016 Management Plan for Muskellunge in Michigan Kregg M. Smith, Michael V. Thomas, and Patrick A. Hanchin www.michigan.gov/dnr/ FISHERIES DIVISION FISHERIES REPORT 12 Suggested Citation Format Smith, K. M., M. V. Thomas, and P. A. Hanchin. 2016. Management plan for Muskellunge in Michigan. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Report 12, Lansing. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) MISSION STATEMENT “The Michigan Department of Natural Resources is committed to the conservation, protection, management, use and enjoyment of the state’s natural and cultural resources for current and future generations.” NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION (NRC) STATEMENT The Natural Resources Commission, as the governing body for the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, provides a strategic framework for the DNR to effectively manage your resources. The NRC holds monthly, public meetings throughout Michigan, working closely with its constituencies in establishing and improving natural resources management policy. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES NON DISCRIMINATION STATEMENT The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) provides equal opportunities for employment and access to Michigan’s natural resources. Both State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, disability, age, sex, height, weight or marital status under the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 as amended (MI PA 453 and MI PA 220, Title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act).
    [Show full text]
  • Ouroboros Has a Head, Tail and Body
    Ouroborum: Transfiguration of the Labyrinth by J. Eric Morales Oregon College of Art and Craft Pacific Northwest College of Art Master of Fine Arts Degree in Applied Craft and Design May 19, 2011 Practicum Committee: JP Reuer, Chairman Joe Biel Anne Marie Oliver Nandini Ranganathan Abstract Embracing the archetype of the labyrinth in both form and concept, the work presented functions as an artistic exploration of the landscape between opposites such as interior / exterior; personal / universal; logical / emotional; matter / space. is project is a labyrinth. is text and presentation are also labyrinthine. Departing from the drawing technique he calls Labyrinthine Projection, the author details his process and the background influences behind the work. e work generally does not represent the typical or classic labyrinth model, though clearly labyrinthine in nature. But like the labyrinth, this work is formulaic because it subscribes to a very rigid set of constraints. Unlike the labyrinth, the work functions best through its meandering rather than a prescribed form. It is an aesthetic that can change character as a function of the viewer’s proximity to the work, or when employed as form versus decoration. is graduate level exploration culminates in an installation of three works. Each finished work was chosen for its representative quality of either art, craft, or design. e installation as a whole represents any successful creative endeavor which must satisfactorily unify these three modes. I consider these modes as indispensable and integral components to the full creative expression, just as the Ouroboros has a head, tail and body. Morales 1 Contents Project Statement 2 Background Influences 3 Work and Process 39 Conclusions 53 List of Illustrations 56 Works Referenced 60 copyright © 2011 J.
    [Show full text]
  • Manchester Junior-Senior High School the Home of the Squires
    MANCHESTER JUNIOR-SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL THE HOME OF THE SQUIRES Student 2017 Handbook 2018 Principal Dr. Jon K. Lippe Assistant Principal Mr. James Bishir 2 Table of Contents Table STUDENT HANDBOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 13 SCHEDULE CHANGES 25 STUDENT FEES AND CHARGES 3 MISSION STATEMENT 13 RE-TAKING A CLASS 26 CARE OF PROPERTY 3 VISION STATEMENT 14 PROMOTION, PLACEMENT, AND 26 VISITORS 3 RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES RETENTION 26 USE OF SCHOOL EQUIPMENT AND 3 SCHOOL DAY 14 WEIGHTED GRADES FACILITIES 3 EMERGENCY CLOSINGS AND DELAYS 14 GRADE POINT AVERAGE SCALE 26 LOCKERS 3 FIRE AND TORNADO DRILLS 14 HONOR ROLL 26 LOST AND FOUND 4 EQUAL EDUCATION OPPORTUNITY 14 VALEDICTORIAN/SALUTATORIAN 26 STUDENT SALES 4 SPECIAL EDUCATION 14 RECOGNITION OF STUDENT 4 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT ACHIEVEMENT GANGS AND GANG ACTIVITY 15 MCS ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE 27 DEFINITIONS ATTENDANCE 15 INDEPENDENT STUDY 4 GENERAL STATEMENT 15 HOMEWORK ATHLETICS 5 EXCUSED ABSENCES 15 STUDENT ASSESSMENT 29 ATHLETIC ELIGIBILITY 5 EXEMPT 15 CONTROVERSIAL SUBJECT MATTER 29 ATHLETIC CODE OF CONDUCT 5 TRUANCY POLICY 29 ENFORCEMENT - CODE OF 6 CONSEQUENCES FOR TRUANCY 16 FIELD TRIPS CONDUCT 6 UNEXCUSED ABSENCES 16 STUDENT EMPLOYMENT 29 ATHLETIC COUNCIL 6 LEAVING SCHOOL DURING THE DAY 16 STUDENT AIDES 29 APPEALS/HEARING 6 LEAVING SCHOOL DUE TO ILLNESS 29 RULES OF THE CODE OF CONDUCT 7 PErfECT ATTENDANCE MEDIA/TECHNOLOGY 31 SELF-REPORTING 7 TARDIES 16 USE OF THE LIBRARY MEDIA CENTER 31 ATHLETIC SEASON DEFINED 17 USE OF TELEPHONES 31 LETTER JACKET POLICY SCHOOL HEALTH AND WELLNESS
    [Show full text]
  • Heraldic Achievement Of
    Heraldic Achievement of MOST REVEREND WILLIAM E. KOENIG Tenth Bishop of Wilmington Gules, crusilly bottony fitchy argent, a lion rampant Or, impaling per fess azure and vert, a wolf passant reguardant argent collared and lined Or behind a lamb couchant of the last, in chief a dove volant recursant descendant in pale argent and issuant from the base an olive branch septuple-fructed Or. Designing his shield—the central element in what is formally called the heraldic achievement—a bishop has an opportunity to depict symbolically aspects of his life and heritage, and elements of the Catholic faith that are important to him. Every coat of arms also includes external elements that identify the rank of the bearer. The formal description of a coat of arms, known as the blazon, uses a technical jargon, derived from French and English terms, that allows the appearance and position of each element to be recorded precisely. A diocesan bishop shows his commitment to the flock he shepherds by combining his personal coat of arms with that of the diocese, in a technique known as impaling. The shield is divided in half along the pale or central vertical line. The arms of the diocese appear on the dexter side — that is, on the side of the shield to the viewer’s left, which would cover the right side (in Latin, dextera) of the person carrying the shield. The arms of the bishop are on the sinister side — the bearer’s left, the viewer’s right. The arms of the Diocese of Wilmington were designed in 1926.
    [Show full text]
  • Flags and Banners
    Flags and Banners A Wikipedia Compilation by Michael A. Linton Contents 1 Flag 1 1.1 History ................................................. 2 1.2 National flags ............................................. 4 1.2.1 Civil flags ........................................... 8 1.2.2 War flags ........................................... 8 1.2.3 International flags ....................................... 8 1.3 At sea ................................................. 8 1.4 Shapes and designs .......................................... 9 1.4.1 Vertical flags ......................................... 12 1.5 Religious flags ............................................. 13 1.6 Linguistic flags ............................................. 13 1.7 In sports ................................................ 16 1.8 Diplomatic flags ............................................ 18 1.9 In politics ............................................... 18 1.10 Vehicle flags .............................................. 18 1.11 Swimming flags ............................................ 19 1.12 Railway flags .............................................. 20 1.13 Flagpoles ............................................... 21 1.13.1 Record heights ........................................ 21 1.13.2 Design ............................................. 21 1.14 Hoisting the flag ............................................ 21 1.15 Flags and communication ....................................... 21 1.16 Flapping ................................................ 23 1.17 See also ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Heraldic Achievement of MOST REVEREND NELSON J
    Heraldic Achievement of MOST REVEREND NELSON J. PEREZ Tenth Archbishop of Philadelphia Per pale: dexter, argent on a pile azure a mullet in chief of the field, overall on a fess sable three plates each charged with a cross throughout gules; sinister, per fess azure and chevronny inverted azure and Or, in chief a Star of Bethlehem argent and in base a mound Or, over all on a fess sable fimbriated argent, a Paschal Lamb reguardant, carrying in the dexter forelimb a palm branch Or and a banner argent charged with a Cross gules In designing the shield — the central element in what is formally called the heraldic achievement — an archbishop has an opportunity to depict symbolically various aspects of his own life and heritage, and to highlight aspects of Catholic faith and devotion that are important to him. The formal description of a coat of arms, known as the blazon, uses a technical language, derived from medieval French and English terms, which allows the appearance and position of each element in the achievement to be recorded precisely. An archbishop shows his commitment to the flock he shepherds by combining his personal coat of arms with that of the archdiocese, in a technique known as impaling. The shield is divided in half along the pale or central vertical line. The arms of the archdiocese appear on the dexter side — that is, on the side of the shield to the viewer’s left, which would cover the right side (in Latin, dextera) of the person carrying the shield. The arms of the archbishop are on the sinister side — the bearer’s left, the viewer’s right.
    [Show full text]
  • Achievements of Arms: a Historical and SCA Perspective
    Achievements of Arms: A Historical and SCA Perspective Herr Andreas von Meißen, OCK 1 Nautilus Pursuivant Emeritus, Barony of Elfsea Kingdom of Ansteorra I. Introduction CHIEVEMENTS of Arms are the pinnacle of heraldic display, both historically and in the Society. Beginning Aas a way of showing a person’s Arms and tournament crest at the same time, they evolved into an elaborate and beautiful art form augmenting the display of Arms. As with all historical practices of Arms, customs of Achievements varied by jurisdiction and heraldic tradition, but as with the practice of Armoury in general, sufficient commonalities exist that a general picture readily emerges. Additionally, Achievements are an underappreciated and woefully underused aspect of Society heraldry. Although the unregulated at the Laurel level, most individual kingdoms are known to have sumptuary laws or guidelines governing the use and display of some or all of their components. Just under three-quarters of the kingdoms in the SCA have codified rules, customs, or traditions governing all or part of the components of Achievements of Arms. These rules are generally intended to serve as heraldic recognition and acknowledgement of advancement in the SCA (over and above the badges and regalia already conferred by such advancement), but vary widely by kingdom in both scope and level of detail. This article will outline the historical development of Achievements, noting some of the regional differences in customs, and the various customs and traditions on the various Kingdoms’ regulations will be presented and discussed in a historical context. II. Achievements of Arms First, though, we will cover the most basic question: What are Achievements of Arms? Rodeny Dennys, former Somerset Herald of Arms in Ordinary and former Arundel Herald of Arms Extraordinary, gives the following definition in The Heraldic Imagination [1]: “Achievement: The full armorial honors of armiger, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Embrace Deer River FY 2019 Full-Service Community Schools Grant Proposal Project Narrative
    Embrace Deer River FY 2019 Full-Service Community Schools Grant Proposal Project Narrative Table of Contents I. Absolute Priority ……………………………………………………………… 3 II. Competitive Preference Priority 1 – Rural Districts ………………………...... 3 III. Competitive Preference Priority 2 – Broadly Representative Consortiums …... 3 IV. Competitive Preference Priority 3 – History of Effectiveness ………………... 4 V. Competitive Preference Priority 4 – Evidence-Based Activities, Strategies, or Interventions …………………………………………………………………… 6 VI. Quality of the Project Design • The extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes to be achieved by the proposed project are clearly specified and measurable …… 8 • The extent to which the design of the proposed project is appropriate to, and will successfully address, the needs of the target population or other identified needs ……………………………………….. 13 VII. Quality of the Project Services • The likely impact of the services to be provided by the proposed project on the intended recipients of those services ……………………….. 25 • The extent to which the services to be provided by the proposed project involve the collaboration of appropriate partners for maximizing the effectiveness of project services …………………………. 32 VIII. Adequacy of Resources • The relevance and demonstrated commitment of each partner in the proposed project to the implementation and success of the project …… 37 • The extent to which the costs are reasonable in relation to the number of persons to be served and to the anticipated results and benefits ……….. 43 IX. Quality of the Management Plan • The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly defined responsibilities/timelines/milestones for accomplishing project tasks ……. 44 • The time commitments of the project director and principal investigator and key project personnel are appropriate and adequate to meet the project objectives ………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Heraldry for Beginners
    The Heraldry Society Educational Charity No: 241456 HERALDRY Beasts, Banners & Badges FOR BEGINNERS Heraldry is a noble science and a fascinating hobby – but essentially it is FUN! J. P. Brooke-Little, Richmond Herald, 1970 www.theheraldrysociety.com The Chairman and Council of the Heraldry Society are indebted to all those who have made this publication possible October 2016 About Us he Heraldry Society was founded in 1947 by John P. Brooke-Little, CVO, KStJ, FSA, FSH, the Tthen Bluemantle Pursuivant of Arms and ultimately, in 1995, Clarenceux King of Arms. In 1956 the Society was incorporated under the Companies Act (1948). By Letters Patent dated 10th August 1957 the Society was granted Armorial Bearings. e Society is both a registered non-prot making company and an educational charity. Our aims The To promote and encourage the study and knowledge of, and to foster and extend interest in, the Heraldry Society science of heraldry, armory, chivalry, precedence, ceremonial, genealogy, family history and all kindred subjects and disciplines. Our activities include Seasonal monthly meetings and lectures Organising a bookstall at all our meetings Publishing a popular newsletter, The Heraldry Gazette, and a more scholarly journal, The Coat of Arms In alternate years, oering a residential Congress with speakers and conducted visits Building and maintaining a heraldry archive Hosting an informative website Supporting regional Societies’ initiatives Our Membership Is inclusive and open to all A prior knowledge of heraldry is not a prerequisite to membership, John Brooke-Little nor is it necessary for members to possess their own arms. e Chairman and Council of the Heraldry Society The Society gratefully acknowledges the owners and holders of copyright in the graphics and images included in this publication which may be reproduced solely for educational purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • IMTT February 2014 Newsletter
    Illinois Muskie Tournament Trail Volume 2 February 2014 “FISH ON” Casting Around with IMTT President Howard Chambliss: Boy what a winter this has been. With record breaking cold, wind and snow it seems like no matter what part of the Midwest you live in it was one of the toughest winters on record. Well it’s February, the worst is behind us and spring is just around the corner. Most have not been out on the water for months. I have heard of a few die hard IMTT members that stayed on the water most of the winter. For most of us we are waiting for the ice to melt and a warm southern breeze before we hit the water. In about 45 days the 2014 IMTT Trail will begin. On March 15th we will meet at Spring Lake North to kick off the Trail. Spring Lake is one of the most interesting Illinois Muskie lakes to fish. It is the brood stock lake for Muskies used at the Jake Wolf Hatchery. The fish are netted and transported to the Hatchery where the eggs and milt are used to raise the Muskies that will be used to stock Muskie lakes state wide. It is well worth the time to visit the Hatchery and see how the hard work of these biologists helps maintain our Muskies. These are some hard working dedicated people. The IMTT has hosted a tournament on this lake for several years. As a past winner of this tournament I can say it is one of the best lakes to catch Muskies in our State.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a More Canadian Regal-Regnal Achievement1
    Towards a More Canadian Regal-Regnal Achievement1 An Historical and Semeiotic Analysis of the 1921 Achievement, with Proposals for Modifications of its Elements Part I. The Emblematic Elements D’ARCY JONATHAN DACRE BOULTON Ph.D. (Penn.), D. Phil. (Oxon.), F.R.H.S.C., F.S.A., A.I.H. University of Notre Dame 1. Introduction Since November 1921,2 the then Dominion and now Kingdom of Canada has possessed an armorial achievement superior in all respects but one to those of the other sovereign states of the Commonwealth.3 It is superior 1 The article that follows is based on a paper delivered on 20 September 2006 in Ottawa, Ontario, to the IVth Annual Colloquium of the Royal Heraldry Society of Canada. I should like to thank those present for their many suggestions and words of encouragement, all of which I have taken seriously, and a number of which I have included in this article. 2 The Royal Warrant by which the new achievement was established was dated 21 November 1921. The full text of the blazon is printed in Alan B. BEDDOE [FHSC] and Strome GALLOWAY [FRHSC], Beddoe’s Canadian Heraldry (Belleville, Ont., 1981), p. 64. See also Conrad SWAN, York Herald of Arms [FRHSC], Canada: Symbols of Sovereignty, An investigation of the arms and seals borne and used from the earliest times to the present in connection with public authority in and over Canada (Toronto and Buffalo, 1977), pp. 63-64. 3 The unprecedented title ‘dominion’ was assigned to the newly confederated entity to which the name ‘Canada’ was at the same time extended in the British North America Act effective on 1 July 1867.
    [Show full text]