Shelton Ku 0099D 16663 DAT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Shelton Ku 0099D 16663 DAT Inventamus Si Progressimus: “We Made It Up as We Went Along” The Evolution of the American Advisory Effort in South Vietnam By Mark S. Shelton B.A. Morehead State University, 1983 M.A. Morehead State University 1987 Submitted to the graduate degree program in the Department of History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ______________________________ Chair: Dr. Eve Levin __________________________ Dr. Robert F. Baumann ________________________ Dr. Jacob W. Kipp __________________________ Dr. Jeffrey P. Moran __________________________ Dr. Ron Barrett-Gonzalez __________________________ Dr, Sheyda F. A. Jahanbani June 3, 2019 Date Defended: _________________ The Dissertation Committee for Mark Shelton certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Inventamus Si Progressimus: “We Made It Up as We Went Along” The Evolution of the American Advisory Effort in South Vietnam ______________________________ Committee Chair: Dr. Eve Levin June 3, 2019 Date Approved: ________________ ii Abstract This dissertation examines the efforts of the South Vietnamese government along with their American military and civilian advisors to devise and implement programs to combat the Viet Cong Infrastructure in South Vietnam prior to the assassination of President Ngo Dinh Diem in 1963. This dissertation will focus on both the Agroville and Strategic Hamlet Programs examining their organization, construction, and goals and the Viet Cong response to counter their implementation. It examines how the South Vietnamese with assistance from the United States military and Central Intelligence Agency under Presidents Dwight D. Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy conducted armed nation-building from 1955‒63 on an unprecedented scale. This dissertation argues that the Viet Cong Infrastructure was so pervasive, and their control of the peasants using terror so systematic, that the price in time, treasure, and especially blood was more than either the South Vietnamese or their American allies were willing to pay to overcome. iii Table of Contents Title Page ......................................................................................................................................... i Acceptance Page ............................................................................................................................. ii Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ v List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ xi List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ xii Acknowledgments........................................................................................................................ xiii Epigraph ...................................................................................................................................... xix Preface.......................................................................................................................................... xxi Chapter 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2. A Thousand Years of Resistance .............................................................................. 21 French Indochina .................................................................................................................... 22 Ho Chi Minh ........................................................................................................................... 26 Chapter 3. The US Army’s Effort to Counter the Communist Insurgency in South Vietnam ....................................................................................................... 37 “How Can We Lose When We’re So Sincere? ....................................................................... 37 The Domino Theory ................................................................................................................ 37 Pacification ............................................................................................................................. 40 Counterinsurgency .................................................................................................................. 44 Chapter 4. The Beginning of the Viet Cong Insurgency ............................................................. 47 Political Infrastructure ............................................................................................................ 47 Infiltration from the North ...................................................................................................... 53 v Viet Cong Terror Tactics ........................................................................................................ 58 Setting the Stage for Revolution in the South ......................................................................... 61 War According to Mao’s Teachings ....................................................................................... 62 The Rise of Ngo Dinh Diem and a Vacuum in the South ....................................................... 64 “It Would be Like Putting a Baby in a Cage of Hungry Lions” ............................................. 67 American Perceptions and the Coming of National Security Council 68 .............................. 68 Chapter 5. Communist Administrative Structure in South Vietnam ............................................ 71 Design and Concept ............................................................................................................... 71 National Liberation Front ...................................................................................................... 74 Political Power Programs ....................................................................................................... 77 Political Parties ...................................................................................................................... 81 Village-Level Politics ............................................................................................................ 83 Limitations on National Liberation Front Success ................................................................ 91 The People’s Revolutionary Party ......................................................................................... 92 Central Office for South Vietnam .......................................................................................... 96 Current Affairs Committee .................................................................................................... 98 Extensions (Organizational) ................................................................................................. 100 The Provisional Revolutionary Government ....................................................................... 101 International Role ................................................................................................................. 104 Communist Intelligence and Security Systems .................................................................... 105 The Central Research Agency ............................................................................................. 105 The People’s Security Service ............................................................................................. 108 Summary .............................................................................................................................. 114 vi Chapter 6: The Failure of South Vietnamese Pacification Programs, 1954‒60 ......................... 117 Ngo Dinh Diem’s Presidency ............................................................................................... 117 Early Pacification Efforts of the Regime .............................................................................. 123 The Agroville Program ......................................................................................................... 132 Organization of the Agroville Program ................................................................................ 137 The Agroville Program Envisioned ...................................................................................... 139 Limitations of the Agroville Program ................................................................................... 140 Final Analysis of the Agroville Program .............................................................................. 145 Viet Minh Remnants in South Vietnam ................................................................................ 149 Security Efforts to Counter Viet Cong Terrorist Activities .................................................. 150 A Question of Priorities ........................................................................................................ 154 Military Assistance Advisory Group .................................................................................... 156 Chapter 7: Diem’s Final Gamble: The Strategic Hamlet Program, 1961‒63 ............................
Recommended publications
  • The Pentagon Papers: Secrets of the Vietnam War Adriana Kelly Junior
    The Pentagon Papers: Secrets of The Vietnam War Adriana Kelly Junior Division Paper 1,890 Words 1 The Pentagon Papers are a series of classified government documents leaked by Daniel Ellsberg in 1971. These papers revealed the lies that both the public and Congress were told about the involvement of the United States in the Vietnam War, and were essential to the withdrawal from the war. Daniel Ellsberg inspired many other whistleblowers to come forward and break the barriers between the public and the government. The involvement of the United States in Vietnam reaches all the way back to 1946. Vietnam was previously a French colony, but during WWII Japan overthrew the French and gave Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia freedom. When WWII ended in 1945, Japan was removed from the area and Vietnam needed new leadership. Ho Chi Minh, a Vietnamese nationalist with Marxist ideas 1, led a group called the Viet Minh to fight for Vietnamese independence against the French, who were trying to reclaim Vietnam. The United States had to pick a side in this war, which is usually referred to as the First Indochina War. On one hand, the United States wanted to support independence and free Vietnam from French rule. But on the other hand, if Vietnam was independent it would be communist which could trigger something called the domino theory. The domino theory states that if one political event in a country, surrounding countries will follow with similar events. Politicians in America were afraid if Vietnam became communist, surrounding countries like Laos, Cambodia, and Thailand would follow.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam Case Study
    Elite Bargains and Political Deals Project: Vietnam Case Study Jeffrey H. Michaels Stabilisation Unit February 2018 This report has been produced by an independent expert. The views contained within do not necessarily reflect UK government policy. Author details The author is a Senior Lecturer, Defence Studies Department, Kings College London. This case study draws on a combination of primary and secondary sources. The primary sources are mainly limited to US Government documents, particularly those dealing with the internal deliberations of the Nixon administration as well as the minutes of meetings at the 1972-1973 Paris peace talks. The secondary sources used include a much wider range, such as general histories of the conflict, as well as more specific diplomatic histories that draw on primary source material from each of the key participants in the conflict (US, North Vietnam, South Vietnam, Provisional Revolutionary Government, USSR and China). Background to Elite Bargains and Political Deals Project This case study is one of a series commissioned to support the Stabilisation Unit’s (SU’s) development of an evidence base relating to elite bargains and political deals. The project explores how national and international interventions have and have not been effective in fostering and sustaining political deals and elite bargains; and whether or not these political deals and elite bargains have helped reduce violence, increased local, regional and national stability and contributed to the strengthening of the relevant political settlement. Drawing on the case studies, the SU has developed a series of summary papers that bring together the project’s key findings and will underpin the revision of the existing ‘UK Approach to Stabilisation’ (2014) paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Signature Redacted Sign Ature Redacted
    VIET NAM'S STRATEGIC HAMLET: DEVELOPMENT AND DENOUEMENT By Leland E. Prentice Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY August 1969 Signature Redacted Signature of Author D&partment of Political Science Certified by Signature Redacted Tht1is S ulepervJsor Sign ature Redacted Accepted by Chairman, Departmental Commi ttee on Graduate Students Archives iAss. INST. rtEC. OCT 2 9 1969 rA RI S 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 MIT Libraries http://libraries.mit.edu/ask DISCLAIMER NOTICE Due to the condition of the original material, there are unavoidable flaws in this reproduction. We have made every effort possible to provide you with the best copy available. Thank you. Some pages in the original document contain text that runs off the edge of the page. I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As in most research, there are certain individuals who contribute to a study but do not appear on the title page. I am personally indebted to many individuals for their contributions throughout my period of study at The Massachusetts Institute of Technology. There are certain individuals to whom I wish to extend my personal appreciation for their efforts to aid me not only in the writing of this thesis, but also in the completion of my academic program. Professors William W. Kaufmann and Donald Blackmer greatly assisted me in my development as a student of political science. Colonel Marshall 0. Becker has relieved me of numerous responsibilities, to the burden of my fellow staff members, in order that I might complete this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Section Summary 16 the WAR’S END and IMPACT SECTION 4
    Name Class Date CHAPTER Section Summary 16 THE WAR’S END AND IMPACT SECTION 4 When Nixon became President, he believed that a peace deal could READING CHECK be negotiated with North Vietnam. When these negotiations stalled, however, Nixon gradually began to pull American troops out of How many American troops Vietnam. He believed that the South Vietnamese Army should fight were killed in Vietnam? on its own and called this approach Vietnamization. He hoped that American supplies to the South Vietnamese Army would be suffi- cient for the army to secure and hold South Vietnam. In 1970, however, Nixon ordered a ground attack on communists in Cambodia, which angered antiwar activists at home who claimed that Nixon was widening the war, not ending it. Protests erupted on many college campuses. At Kent State University, members of the National Guard fired into a group of protesters, killing four. This led to demonstrations on other campuses, including Jackson State in Mississippi, where two students were killed. Other events also outraged the public. American troops killed VOCABULARY STRATEGY over four hundred unarmed Vietnamese in the village of My Lai. What does the word induced The Pentagon Papers showed that the government had been dishon- mean in the underlined sen- est with the public and with Congress about the Vietnam War. tence? Circle the words in the American bombing finally induced the North Vietnamese to underlined sentence that could resume negotiations. In January 1973, the United States, South help you learn what induced Vietnam, North Vietnam, and the Vietcong signed the Paris Peace means.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Nation-Building During Insurgency in U.S. Defense Policy Strategy
    BearWorks MSU Graduate Theses Fall 2019 Analysis of Nation-Building during Insurgency in U.S. Defense Policy Strategy Joseph Valles Missouri State University, [email protected] As with any intellectual project, the content and views expressed in this thesis may be considered objectionable by some readers. However, this student-scholar’s work has been judged to have academic value by the student’s thesis committee members trained in the discipline. The content and views expressed in this thesis are those of the student-scholar and are not endorsed by Missouri State University, its Graduate College, or its employees. Follow this and additional works at: https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons, Military History Commons, Other International and Area Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Valles, Joseph, "Analysis of Nation-Building during Insurgency in U.S. Defense Policy Strategy" (2019). MSU Graduate Theses. 3453. https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/3453 This article or document was made available through BearWorks, the institutional repository of Missouri State University. The work contained in it may be protected by copyright and require permission of the copyright holder for reuse or redistribution. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ANALYSIS OF NATION-BUILDING DURING INSURGENCY IN U.S. DEFENSE POLICY STRATEGY A Master’s Thesis Presented to The Graduate College of Missouri State University TEMPLATE In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science, Defense and Strategic Studies By Joseph Valles December 2019 Copyright 2019 by Joseph Valles ii ANALYSIS OF NATION-BUILDING DURING INSURGENCY IN U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pentagon Papers Case
    The Legacy of John Adams The Pentagon Papers Case In 1967 Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara commissioned a study of the his- tory of US decision-making of policies involving Indochina, specifically Vietnam. The resulting documents became known as the Pentagon Papers. In 1971, Daniel Ellsberg, a government researcher, gave copies of the documents to the press. On June 13, 1971, the New York Times began publishing arti- cles about the documents and the Washington Post published infor- mation later that same week. On June 15 the government went to a New York federal district court seeking an injunction prohibiting the Times from publishing arti- cles about the Pentagon Papers. A scanned image of The New York Times front page of May, 1973. The government pursued similar action against the Post in the District of Columbia. The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, reversing the New York dis- trict court who had refused to grant an injunction, granted an injunction as to the Times, who immediately appealed. The District of Columbia court refused to grant an injunction as to the Post and the government appealed. The two cases were consolidated for hearing and the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments on June 26, 1971. The government argued that prior restraint (prohibiting information from being published) was necessary to protect national security; howev- er, on June 30, a divided Court refused to stop publication of the Pentagon Papers because the government failed to meet the burden to justify prior restraint. New York Times Co. v United States became an important precedent in support of the First Amendment’s freedom of the press.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 12 Americans in Indochina
    UNIT 12 AMERICANS IN INDOCHINA CHAPTER 1 THE FRENCH IN INDOCHINA.......................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 2 COMMUNISM, GUERRILLAS AND FALLING DOMINOES .....................................................5 CHAPTER 3 ʹSINK OR SWIM, WITH NGO DINH DIEMʹ...................................................................................9 CHAPTER 4 FIGHTING AGAINST GUERRILLAS: THE STRATEGIC HAMLET PROGRAM...................12 CHAPTER 5 EXIT NGO DINH DIEM AND THE GULF OF TONKIN INCIDENT.......................................16 CHAPTER 6 FIGHTING A GUERRILLA WAR...................................................................................................22 CHAPTER 7 HOW MY LAI WAS PACIFIED ......................................................................................................25 CHAPTER 8 THE TET OFFENSIVE .....................................................................................................................30 CHAPTER 9 VIETNAMIZATION ........................................................................................................................36 CHAPTER 10 THE WAR IS FINISHED.................................................................................................................40 CHAPTER 11 WAS THE ʹWHOLE THING A LIEʹ OR A ʹNOBLE CRUSADEʹ...............................................43 by Thomas Ladenburg, copyright, 1974, 1998, 2001, 2007 100 Brantwood Road, Arlington, MA 02476 781-646-4577 [email protected] Page
    [Show full text]
  • A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers Ken Hagan
    Naval War College Review Volume 56 Article 16 Number 3 Summer 2003 Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers Ken Hagan Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Hagan, Ken (2003) "Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers," Naval War College Review: Vol. 56 : No. 3 , Article 16. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol56/iss3/16 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 168 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE REVIEW Hagan: Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers specialized and foreign terms used in the abruptly dismissed the government’s book, at exactly the right level of detail. case, because in the last few weeks evi- In sum, The Other Side of the Mountain dence had materialized showing that is a unique and valuable contribution to agents of the Richard M. Nixon admin- the study of unconventional warfare. In istration had denied Ellsberg his right view of the ongoing U.S. operations in to a fair trial by burglarizing his psychi- Afghanistan, the editors would be per- atrist’s office in search of material with forming a civic service were they to which to blackmail him into not releas- produce a revised and reedited version ing more documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Beacon Press and the Pentagon Papers
    BEACON PRESS AND THE PENTAGON PAPERS Beacon Press 25 Beacon Street Boston, Massachusetts 02108-2892 www.beacon.org Beacon Press books are published under the auspices of the Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations. Grateful acknowledgment is made to Allison Trzop, the author of this history, and to the Unitarian Universalist Veatch Program at Shelter Rock for their generous support of this project. © 2007 by Allison Trzop Originally submitted as a master’s degree project for Emerson College in May 2006 All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America 10 09 08 07 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 This book is printed on acid-free paper that meets the uncoated paper ANSI/NISO specifications for permanence as revised in 1992. Composition by Wilsted & Taylor Publishing Services It’s tragic when a nation, dedicated and committed to the principle of freedom, reaches such a point that the greatest fear we have is from the government itself. edwin lane 1971 june 13 The New York Times publishes its first article on the Pentagon Papers under the headline “Vietnam Archive.” june 29–30 Senator Mike Gravel reads from the papers to his Senate subcommittee and enters the rest into its records. The papers are made public. august 17 Beacon Press publicly announces its intention to publish the papers. october 10 The government version of the Pentagon Papers is published. october 22 The Beacon Press edition of the Pentagon Papers is published simultaneously in cloth and paper in four volumes. october 27 FBI agents appear at the New England Merchants National Bank asking to see UUA records.
    [Show full text]
  • History Unit 3: the Vietnam War the Academic Notebook
    SREB Readiness Courses Transitioning to college and careers Literacy Ready History Unit 3: The Vietnam War The Academic Notebook Name 1 The Academic Notebook Literacy Ready . History Unit 3 Unit 3 Table of Contents Course Overview ................................................................................................3 Lesson 1: Overview: US and Vietnam ................................................................4 Lesson 2: Types of Texts ..................................................................................12 Lesson 3: Timeline of Vietnam .........................................................................16 Lesson 4: Reading and Annotating a History Text ...........................................24 Lesson 5: Answering Document-Based Questions .........................................38 Lesson 6: Interpreting History and Writing an Argument .................................58 2 The Academic Notebook Literacy Ready . History Unit 3 Course Overview Welcome! You are enrolled in a second history unit of the SREB Readiness Course- Literacy Ready. What does historical literacy mean? Historical literacy is the ability to read and determine meaning from historical sources whether they are primary, secondary or tertiary sources. In this course, you will take part in several activities to improve your historical literacy. While the content covered in this course is important, a principal purpose is to equip you with the tools necessary to be more successful in college coursework. To that end, the creators of the course have developed this academic notebook. Purposes of the Academic Notebook The academic notebook has two roles in this course. The first role of the notebook is to provide you with a personal space to record your work. The academic notebook is where you should record your thoughts about materials you are reading. For example, if you are hearing a lecture, take notes in this notebook. Use the tools in the notebook to assist you in organizing your notes.
    [Show full text]
  • Courtesy of the National Archives and Records Service Lyndon Baines Johnson Library Association for Diplomatic Studies and Train
    Courtesy of the National Archives and Records Service Lyndon Baines Johnson Library Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training oreign Affairs Oral History Pro$ect RUFUS PHILLIPS Interviewed by: Ted Gittinger Initial interview date: March 4, 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS Background University of Virginia Law School Served briefly with CIA US Army, Korean ,ar, Vietnam ,ar Vietnam ,ar 1.5011.52 Saigon 3ilitary 3ission North Vietnamese Catholics Colonel Lansdale Use of rench language Joe Ban4on Soc Trang Province Hanh Diem 3agsaysay Ambassador 5eneral Lawton Collins 6retired7 Liaison Officer Ca 3au operation Operation Brotherhood ilipinos Reoccupation of 8one 5 rench Operation Atlante 5eneral 3ike O9Daniel Colonel Kim Training Relations Instruction 3ission 6TRI37 Viet 3inh evacuation rench1Diem relations Resentment of Viet 3inh 3AA5 Binh :uyen Central Intelligence Agency 6CIA7 1 Vietnamese psywar school Setting up 515 staff Kieu Cong Cung Civil Action Pro$ect AID 3ission Re1organi4ation of Vietnamese army Viet 3inh preparations for resurgence in South Pre1Ho Chi 3inh Trail Civil 5uard Colonel Lansdale Tran Trung Dung 3ontagnards Destabili4ing Viet 3inh regime Almanac incidents Bui An Tuan Vietnam ;uoc Dan Dang 6VN;DD7 Truong Chinh Political Program for Vietnam 5eneral O1Daniel Ambassador Collins/CIA relations Land Reform ,olf Lade$isky Saigon racketeering operations rench anti1US operations Saigon bombing US facilities Howie Simpson Bay Vien rench 5eneral Ely Trinh 3inh Thé Vietnamese/ rench relations Romaine De osse rench deal with Ho Chi
    [Show full text]
  • The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project RUFUS C. PHILLIPS, III Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: July 19, 1995 Copyright 1998 A ST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born in Ohio; raised in irginia Williams College U.S. Army, Korea - 1954 Saigon, ietnam, U.S. Army ,-ansdale mission. 1954-1955 North ietnam refugees National Security Program 0eoccupying iet 1inh areas Political parties Diem 2s. France French-U.S. relationship Ambassador Donald Heath T0I1-5oint 1ilitary 1ission Ci2ilian 2s. military morale iet 1inh southern network Kieu Cong Cung Phillip7s mission and duties Political indoctrination 1ontagnards South ietnam security problem Washington, DC - CIA - ietnam Affairs 1955 ietnam Ci2il 8uard training Ci2ic Action in South ietnam U.S. support of Diem Traditional ietnam go2ernment Saigon, ietnam 1959-1957 Ci2ic Action organization Duties and projects ientiane, -aos - CIA 1957-1959 1 Ci2ic Action program Pathet -ao agreement Project "Booster Shot" National Assembly Elections Economic Aid projects Souphanou2ong AID 2s. CIA methods North ietnamese -ao speakers in Pathet -ao units North ietnamese occupy part of Sam Neau pro2ince Pri2ate sector employment 1959-1990 ietnam - ,CO0DS. - Assistant Director - 0ural Affairs 1992-1995 Counter-insurgency program 1AC and 1AA8 Phu Yon pro2ince pacification plan AID mission Strategic Hamlet Program Pro2incial committees Diem Farming projects Personnel American Ad2isors groups Washington confusion 8eneral -andsdale NSC meeting - 199A 1r. President ,Kennedy. "We are not winning the war." -ooming disaster 1cNamara 8eneral Abrams Coup against Diem and Nhu Post-coup talks Ambassador -odge 1arginalization INTERVIEW ": Today is July 19, 1995. This is an interview with Rufus C.
    [Show full text]