Beacon Press and the Pentagon Papers
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Media Ownership Chart
In 1983, 50 corporations controlled the vast majority of all news media in the U.S. At the time, Ben Bagdikian was called "alarmist" for pointing this out in his book, The Media Monopoly . In his 4th edition, published in 1992, he wrote "in the U.S., fewer than two dozen of these extraordinary creatures own and operate 90% of the mass media" -- controlling almost all of America's newspapers, magazines, TV and radio stations, books, records, movies, videos, wire services and photo agencies. He predicted then that eventually this number would fall to about half a dozen companies. This was greeted with skepticism at the time. When the 6th edition of The Media Monopoly was published in 2000, the number had fallen to six. Since then, there have been more mergers and the scope has expanded to include new media like the Internet market. More than 1 in 4 Internet users in the U.S. now log in with AOL Time-Warner, the world's largest media corporation. In 2004, Bagdikian's revised and expanded book, The New Media Monopoly , shows that only 5 huge corporations -- Time Warner, Disney, Murdoch's News Corporation, Bertelsmann of Germany, and Viacom (formerly CBS) -- now control most of the media industry in the U.S. General Electric's NBC is a close sixth. Who Controls the Media? Parent General Electric Time Warner The Walt Viacom News Company Disney Co. Corporation $100.5 billion $26.8 billion $18.9 billion 1998 revenues 1998 revenues $23 billion 1998 revenues $13 billion 1998 revenues 1998 revenues Background GE/NBC's ranks No. -
Unitarian Universalist Association Annual Report June 2008
Unitarian Universalist Association Annual Report June 2008 William G. Sinkford-President Kathleen Montgomery-Executive Vice President 1 INTRODUCTION The Association’s mission for the staff is to: 1. Support the health and vitality of Unitarian Universalist congregations as they minister in their communities. 2. Open the doors of Unitarian Universalism to people who yearn for liberal religious community. 3. Be a respected voice for liberal religious values. This report outlines for you, by staff group, the work that has been done on your behalf this year by the staff of the Unitarian Universalist Association. It comes with great appreciation for their extraordinary work in a time of many new initiatives in response to the needs of our faith and our congregations. If you have questions in response to the information contained here, please feel free to contact Kay Montgomery ([email protected]). William G. Sinkford, President Kathleen Montgomery, Executive Vice President 2 CONTENTS STAFF GROUPS: Advocacy and Witness Page 4 Congregational Services Page 6 District Services Page 13 Identity Based Ministries Page 15 Lifespan Faith Development Page 16 Ministry and Professional Leadership Page 24 Communications Page 27 Beacon Press Page 31 Stewardship and Development Page 33 Financial Services Page 36 Operations / Facilities Equal Employment Opportunity Report Page 37 3 ADVOCACY AND WITNESS STAFF GROUP The mission of the Advocacy and Witness staff group is to carry Unitarian Universalist values into the wider world by inserting UU perspectives into public debates of the day. Advocacy and Witness staff members work closely in coalitions with other organizations which share our values, as well as local UU congregations, to be effective in this ministry internationally, nationally, and in state and local efforts. -
UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST CONGREGATION of CASTINE July 8, 2018
UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST CONGREGATION OF CASTINE July 8, 2018 “A Faith That Moves Us Now” "The purpose of the church is to heal the consequences of lovelessness and injustice in the hearts and souls of our members so they might heal the community and together heal the world." ~ Nancy Bowen READING “Saving Unitarian Universalism” ~ John T. Crestwell, Jr. [page 56, Voices from the Margins, An Anthology of Meditations, edited by Jacqui James and Mark D. Morrison-Reed. Boston: Skinner House Books, 2012] The thing that will save our faith, and that will allow us to become better lovers, fathers, mothers, daughters, sons, and friends, is building relationships – learning more about each other – seeing God in all people, places, and things. It’s rooted in experience. The more we learn and grow with liberal minds and hearts, the more we see the Spirit emanating. The more we learn about our common destiny, the more we see that we all come from the same source; that we are all capable of good; that “God don’t make no junk”; that the world we have is the world we’ve collectively created through our thoughts, words, and deeds. And when we see things differently, we can start doing things differently. READING “Love Abundant” ~ Alicia Forde [page 62, Voices from the Margins, An Anthology of Meditations, edited by Jacqui James and Mark D. Morrison-Reed. Boston: Skinner House Books, 2012] I lift my eyes up to the hills from where will my help come? My help comes from Love abundant. my help comes from the hills my help—my help, it comes from ancient Mothers whose hearts beat in mine. -
The Pentagon Papers: Secrets of the Vietnam War Adriana Kelly Junior
The Pentagon Papers: Secrets of The Vietnam War Adriana Kelly Junior Division Paper 1,890 Words 1 The Pentagon Papers are a series of classified government documents leaked by Daniel Ellsberg in 1971. These papers revealed the lies that both the public and Congress were told about the involvement of the United States in the Vietnam War, and were essential to the withdrawal from the war. Daniel Ellsberg inspired many other whistleblowers to come forward and break the barriers between the public and the government. The involvement of the United States in Vietnam reaches all the way back to 1946. Vietnam was previously a French colony, but during WWII Japan overthrew the French and gave Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia freedom. When WWII ended in 1945, Japan was removed from the area and Vietnam needed new leadership. Ho Chi Minh, a Vietnamese nationalist with Marxist ideas 1, led a group called the Viet Minh to fight for Vietnamese independence against the French, who were trying to reclaim Vietnam. The United States had to pick a side in this war, which is usually referred to as the First Indochina War. On one hand, the United States wanted to support independence and free Vietnam from French rule. But on the other hand, if Vietnam was independent it would be communist which could trigger something called the domino theory. The domino theory states that if one political event in a country, surrounding countries will follow with similar events. Politicians in America were afraid if Vietnam became communist, surrounding countries like Laos, Cambodia, and Thailand would follow. -
IN THIS ISSUE UUA Bookstore Has a New Name Thrive Youth
Monthly eNews from UUA Stewardship and Development e-newsletter February 2, 2016 IN THIS ISSUE UUA Bookstore Has a New Name Thrive Youth Applications Open Is Your Congregation on the #BlackLivesMatter Map? UU Reads: The Third Reconstruction Donor Feature: Steven Ballesteros Register Now — UU-UNO Spring Seminar A Turning Point for Unitarian Universalism UUA Bookstore Has a New Name The UUA Bookstore wants to share the good news of Unitarian Universalim with a wider audience and has changed its name to inSpirit: UU Book and Gift Shop. The word "inspirit" is rich in meaning. It can mean to fill with spirit, to encourage, to exhilarate, or to bestow with strength or purpose. The new name reflects the many ways inSpirit serves UUs, our congregations, and our communities. inSpirit offers a wide range of books and gifts that reflect the values of our UU movement, including titles from Skinner House Books and Beacon Press, selected titles from other publishers, and fair trade gift and clothing items. inSpirit will continue to bring in new merchandise and reading materials to attract a wide, progressive audience online and to the Boston storefront. Thrive Youth Applications Open Thrive Youth Applications are now open. Thanks to your generosity, Unitarian Universalist Youth of Color will come together for a five-day gathering to deepen their faith, lift their spirits, and build critical skills for leadership in the face of our broken, yet beautiful world. Thrive participants will be guided by experienced facilitators as they worship together, play, explore their racial and ethnic identities, develop leadership skills, and create supportive community. -
Daniel Ellsberg
This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755-6000 FOIA Case: 101038A 10 July 2017 JOHN GREENEWALD Dear Mr. Greenewald: This is our final response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request of 6 March 2017 for Intellipedia entries on "PENTAGON PAPERS" and/ or "Daniel Ells berg" and/ or "Daniel Sheehan" as well as any search results pages. A copy of your request is enclosed. As stated in our initial response to you, dated 7 March 20 17, your request was assigned Case Number 101038. For purposes of this request and based on the information you provided in your letter, you are considered an "all other" requester. As such, you are allowed 2 hours of search and the duplication of 100 pages at no cost. There are no assessable fees for this request. Your request has been processed under the provisions of the FOIA. For your information, NSA provides a service of common concern for the Intelligence Community (IC) by serving as the executive agent for Intelink. As such, NSA provides technical services that enable users to access and share information with peers and stakeholders across the IC and DoD. -
Public Service, Private Media: the Political Economy of The
PUBLIC SERVICE, PRIVATE MEDIA: THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE CABLE-SATELLITE PUBLIC AFFAIRS NETWORK (C-SPAN) by GLENN MICHAEL MORRIS A DISSERTATION Presented to the School of Journalism and Communication and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2010 11 University of Oregon Graduate School Confirmation ofApproval and Acceptance of Dissertation prepared by: Glenn Morris Title: "Public Service, Private Media: The Political Economy ofthe Cable-Satellite Public Affairs Network (C-SPAN)." This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree in the Department of Journalism and Communication by: Janet Wasko, Chairperson, Journalism and Communication Carl Bybee, Member, Journalism and Communication Gabriela Martinez, Member, Journalism and Communication John Foster, Outside Member, Sociology and Richard Linton, Vice President for Research and Graduate Studies/Dean ofthe Graduate School for the University of Oregon. June 14,2010 Original approval signatures are on file with the Graduate School and the University of Oregon Libraries. 111 © 2010 Glenn Michael Morris IV An Abstract of the Dissertation of Glenn Michael Morris for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Journalism and Communication to be taken June 2010 Title: PUBLIC SERVICE, PRIVATE MEDIA: THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE CABLE-SATELLITE PUBLIC AFFAIRS NETWORK (C-SPAN) Approved: _ Dr. Janet Wasko The Satellite-Cable Public Affairs Network (C-SPAN) is the only television outlet in the U.S. providing Congressional coverage. Scholars have studied the network's public affairs content and unedited "gavel-to-gavel" style of production that distinguish it from other television channels. -
Vietnam Case Study
Elite Bargains and Political Deals Project: Vietnam Case Study Jeffrey H. Michaels Stabilisation Unit February 2018 This report has been produced by an independent expert. The views contained within do not necessarily reflect UK government policy. Author details The author is a Senior Lecturer, Defence Studies Department, Kings College London. This case study draws on a combination of primary and secondary sources. The primary sources are mainly limited to US Government documents, particularly those dealing with the internal deliberations of the Nixon administration as well as the minutes of meetings at the 1972-1973 Paris peace talks. The secondary sources used include a much wider range, such as general histories of the conflict, as well as more specific diplomatic histories that draw on primary source material from each of the key participants in the conflict (US, North Vietnam, South Vietnam, Provisional Revolutionary Government, USSR and China). Background to Elite Bargains and Political Deals Project This case study is one of a series commissioned to support the Stabilisation Unit’s (SU’s) development of an evidence base relating to elite bargains and political deals. The project explores how national and international interventions have and have not been effective in fostering and sustaining political deals and elite bargains; and whether or not these political deals and elite bargains have helped reduce violence, increased local, regional and national stability and contributed to the strengthening of the relevant political settlement. Drawing on the case studies, the SU has developed a series of summary papers that bring together the project’s key findings and will underpin the revision of the existing ‘UK Approach to Stabilisation’ (2014) paper. -
Elite: Uncovering Classism in Unitarian Universalist History (Skinner House Books, 2011), by the Reverend Mark W
Elite: Uncovering Classism in Unitarian and Universalist History by Mark W. Harris (Boston: Skinner House Books, 2011) Discussion Guide for Unitarian Universalist Groups by Gail Forsyth-Vail and Susan Dana Lawrence Gail Forsyth-Vail , adult programs director for the Unitarian Universalist Association’s Ministries and Faith Development staff group, is a master level credentialed religious educator, the author of the Tapestry of Faith Toolkit Book Stories in Faith , and a co-author of the Tapestry of Faith curriculum Harvest the Power: Developing Lay Leadership . Susan Dana Lawrence serves in the Unitarian Universalist Association’s Ministries and Faith Development staff group as managing editor of the Tapestry of Faith curriculum and resources project. The editor of the Family pages of UU World , she is a co-author of the Tapestry of Faith children’s program Wonderful Welcome, and the multigenerational program, Miracles. Table of Contents Introduction.........................................................................................................................i Session 1 (60- or 90-minute), Founding Stories................................................................1 Session 2 (60- or 90-minute), How Do We Thrive? How Are We Saved?.........................8 Session 3 (60- or 90-minute), Scientific Salvation...........................................................14 Introduction Elite: Uncovering Classism in Unitarian Universalist History (Skinner House Books, 2011), by the Reverend Mark W. Harris, explores historical events -
What Is Marriage For? a LEADER’S GUIDE
What Is Marriage For? A LEADER’S GUIDE Adapted from At Issue: Marriage, Exploring the Debate over Marriage Rights for Same-Sex Couples Leader’s Guide, by Scott Hirschfeld ISBN 0-8070-9143-X CONTENTS Introduction 2 Getting Started 3 SESSION I 5 Part 1: Defining Marriage and Its Purpose Part 2: Evolving Understandings of Marriage SESSION II 7 Part 1: Modern Understandings of Marriage Part 2: Attitudes toward Same-Sex Marriage Part 3: Revisiting Our Definitions Further Reading/Acknowledgments APPENDIX 10 Handout 1 Evolving Understandings of Marriage Handout 2 Evolving Understandings of Marriage (Chart) Handout 3 Modern Understandings of Marriage Handout 4 Participant Evaluation Form Leader Evaluation Form What Is Marriage For?: The Strange Social History of our Most Intimate Institution by E.J. Graff Beacon Press, 1999/$15.00/paperback/0-8070-4115-7 UUA Bookstore: 1-800-215-9076 or www.uua.org This guide was adapted from At Issue: Marriage, Exploring the Debate over Marriage Rights for Same-Sex Couples, published by the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN). The complete 6-lesson guide is available from the GLSEN Bookstore at www.atlasbooks.com/ glsen or 1-800-247-6553. Introduction In What is Marriage For?: The Strange Social History of our Most Intimate Institution, E.J. Graff describes marriage as “a kind of Jerusalem, an archaeological site on which the present is constantly building over the past, letting history’s many layers twist and tilt into today’s walls and floors.” Indeed, the institution of marriage has changed dramatically over the centuries to reflect evolving understandings of family, money, sex, love and power. -
Section Summary 16 the WAR’S END and IMPACT SECTION 4
Name Class Date CHAPTER Section Summary 16 THE WAR’S END AND IMPACT SECTION 4 When Nixon became President, he believed that a peace deal could READING CHECK be negotiated with North Vietnam. When these negotiations stalled, however, Nixon gradually began to pull American troops out of How many American troops Vietnam. He believed that the South Vietnamese Army should fight were killed in Vietnam? on its own and called this approach Vietnamization. He hoped that American supplies to the South Vietnamese Army would be suffi- cient for the army to secure and hold South Vietnam. In 1970, however, Nixon ordered a ground attack on communists in Cambodia, which angered antiwar activists at home who claimed that Nixon was widening the war, not ending it. Protests erupted on many college campuses. At Kent State University, members of the National Guard fired into a group of protesters, killing four. This led to demonstrations on other campuses, including Jackson State in Mississippi, where two students were killed. Other events also outraged the public. American troops killed VOCABULARY STRATEGY over four hundred unarmed Vietnamese in the village of My Lai. What does the word induced The Pentagon Papers showed that the government had been dishon- mean in the underlined sen- est with the public and with Congress about the Vietnam War. tence? Circle the words in the American bombing finally induced the North Vietnamese to underlined sentence that could resume negotiations. In January 1973, the United States, South help you learn what induced Vietnam, North Vietnam, and the Vietcong signed the Paris Peace means. -
The Pentagon Papers Case
The Legacy of John Adams The Pentagon Papers Case In 1967 Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara commissioned a study of the his- tory of US decision-making of policies involving Indochina, specifically Vietnam. The resulting documents became known as the Pentagon Papers. In 1971, Daniel Ellsberg, a government researcher, gave copies of the documents to the press. On June 13, 1971, the New York Times began publishing arti- cles about the documents and the Washington Post published infor- mation later that same week. On June 15 the government went to a New York federal district court seeking an injunction prohibiting the Times from publishing arti- cles about the Pentagon Papers. A scanned image of The New York Times front page of May, 1973. The government pursued similar action against the Post in the District of Columbia. The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, reversing the New York dis- trict court who had refused to grant an injunction, granted an injunction as to the Times, who immediately appealed. The District of Columbia court refused to grant an injunction as to the Post and the government appealed. The two cases were consolidated for hearing and the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments on June 26, 1971. The government argued that prior restraint (prohibiting information from being published) was necessary to protect national security; howev- er, on June 30, a divided Court refused to stop publication of the Pentagon Papers because the government failed to meet the burden to justify prior restraint. New York Times Co. v United States became an important precedent in support of the First Amendment’s freedom of the press.