DOCSLIB.ORG

List of Genes in Phaseolus Vulgaris for Resistance to Viruses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
List of Genes in Phaseolus Vulgaris for Resistance to Viruses LIST OF GENES IN PHASEOLUS VULGARIS FOR RESISTANCE TO VIRUSES R. Provvidenti New York State Agricultural Experiment Station Cornell University, Geneva, NY 14456 Since 1940, a number of studies have been conducted in the USA and abroad to elucidate the inheritance of resistance to viral diseases of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Here, the 26 known single genes for resistance to 16 viruses are tabulated and pertinent references included. Symbols are proposed for genes conferring resistance to alfalfa mosaic virus, bean pod mottle virus, bean southern mosaic virus, beet curly top virus, and tobacco ringspot virus. No symbols were previously assigned to these genes. The symbol byji has been replaced with cyy, since the severe strain of bean yellow mosaic virus is now regarded as a strain of clover yellow vein virus. Gene symbol (synonym) Character, virus, and reference *Amv Single dominant, confers a high level of resistance to a strain of alfalfa mosaic virus (Wade & Zaumeyer, 1940). *Amv-2 A duplicate of Amv. independently inherited, for resistance to the same strain of alfalfa mosaic virus (Wade & Zaumeyer, 1940). bÇ-1, bc-1^ Single recessive, strain-specific alíeles, temperature insensitive, for resistance to bean common mosaic virus (Drijfhout, 1978). bÇ.:2, bc-2^ Single recessive, strain-specific alíeles, temperature insensitive, for resistance to bean common mosaic virus (Drijfhout, 1978). bc-3 Single recessive, strain-specific, temperature insensitive, for resistance to bean common mosaic virus (Drijfhout, 1978). bc-u Single recessive, strain-unspecific, necessary for the expression of strain-specific genes for resistance to bean common mosaic virus (Drijfhout, 1978). Bcm Single dominant, temperature sensitive, for resistance to blackeve cowoea mosaic virus. Tightly linked, if not identical, to the 1 gene for resistance to bean common mosaic virus (Provvidenti, Gonsaîves & Taiwo, 1983; Kyle & Provvidenti, 1987). Gene symbol (synonym) Character, virus, and reference *Bpm Single dominant for resistance to bean pod mottle virus (Thomas & Zaumeyer, 1950). *Bsm Single dominant for resistance to bean southern mosaic virus (Zaumeyer & Harter, 1943). By Single dominant, strain specific, for resistance to pea mosaic virus. considered to be a strain of bean yellow mosaic virus (Schroeder & Provvidenti, 1968). Ey:¿ Single dominant, temperature sensitive, strain-unspecific for resistance to bean vellow mosaic virus (Dickson & Natti, 1968). Cam Single dominant, temperature sensitive, for resistance to cowoea aphid-borne mosaic virus. Tightly linked, if not identical, to the 1 gene for resistance to bean common mosaic virus (Provvidenti, Gonsalves &Taiwo, 1983; Kyle & Provvidenti, 1987). *Ctv Single dominant for resistance to beet curlv top virus (Schultz & Dean, 1947). *ctv-2 Single recessive for resistance to beet curlv too virus. Inherited independently of £îv (Schultz & Dean, 1947). *£y V (ti.yi3.) Single recessive for a high level of resistance to clover vellow vein virus, formerly known as the severe, necrotic, or pod-distorting strain of bean yellow mosaic virus (Provvidenti & Schroeder, 1973; Tu, 1983). Hsw Single dominant, temperature sensitive, for resistance to watermelon mosaic virus 2. Very tightly linked, if not identical, to the i gene for bean common mosaic virus (Kyle & Provvidenti, 1987). i Single dominant, temperature sensitive, for resistance to bean common mosaic virus. Tightly linked, if not identical, to Bern. Cam, and Hsw (Ali, 1950; Kyle, Dickson & Provvidenti, 1986). Mrf Single dominant for immunity to bean ruoose mosaic virus. At the same locus as Mrf^ and mrf (Machado & Pinchinat, 1975). Gene symbol (synonym) Character, virus, and reference Mli At the same locus as Mrf and mrf. Recessive to Md for immunity, but dominant to rnrf for susceptibility to bean rugose mosaic virus (IVIachado & Pinchinat, 1975) Pmv Single incompletely dominant for resistance to peanut mottle virus (Provvidenti & Chirco, 1987). Smv Single incompletely dominant for resistance to sovbean mosaic virus (Provvidenti, Gonsalves & Ranalli, 1982). Tm Single dominant for immunity to tobacco mosaic virus (Thompson, Lower & Thornberry, 1952). 'try. Single recessive for resistance to tobacco ringsoot virus (Tu, 1983). Wmv Single dominant for resistance to watermelon mosaic virus 2 (Provvidenti, 1974; Kyle & Provvidenti, 1987). Symbol proposed by R. Provvidenti, 1987. REFERENCES Ali, Mohamed A. 1950. Genetics of resistance to the common bean mosaic virus (bean virus 1) in bean {Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Phytopathology 40:69-70 Dickson, M. H., and J. J. Natti. 1968. Inheritance of resistance of Phaseolus vulgaris to bean yellow mosaic virus. Phytopathology 58:1450 Drijfhout, E. 1978. Genetic interaction between Phaseolus vulgaris and bean common mosaic virus with implications for strain identification and breeding for resistance. Agr. Res. Rep . 872, Wageningen, 98 pp. Kyle, M. M., M. H. Dickson, and R. Provvidenti. 1986. Linkage analysis of hypersensitive resistance to four viruses in Phaseolus vulgaris. Bean Improv. Coop. 29:80-81. Kyle, M. M., and R. Provvidenti. 1987. Inheritance of resistance to potato Y viruses in Phaseolus vulgaris : I. Two independent genes for resistance to watermelon mosaic virus 2. Theor. Appl. Genetics (Submitted) Machado, P. F. R., and A. M. Pinchinat. 1975. Herencia de la reacción del frijol común a la infección por el virus del mosaico rugoso. Turrialba 25:418-419. Provvidenti, R. 1974. Inheritance of resistance to watermelon mosaic virus 2 in Phaseolus vulgaris. Phytopathology 64:1448-1450. Provvidenti, R., and E. M. Chirco. 1987. Inheritance of resistance to peanut mottle virus in Phaseolus vulgaris. J. Heredity (Submitted) Provvidenti, R., and W. T. Schroeder. 1973. Resistance in Phaseolus vulgaris to the severe strain of bean yellow mosaic virus. Phytopathology 63:196-197. Provvidenti, R., D. Gonsalves, and P. Ranalli. 1982. Inheritance of resistance to soybean mosaic virus in Phaseolus vulgaris. J. Heredity 73:302-303 Provvidenti, R., D. Gonsalves, and M. A, Taiwo. 1983. Inheritance of resistance to blackeye cowpea mosaic virus and cowpea aphid-borne mosaic virus in Phaseolus vulgaris. J. Heredity 74:60-61. Schroeder, W. T., and R. Provvidenti. 1968. Resistance of bean {Phaseolus vulgaris ) to the PV2 strain of bean yellow mosaic virus conditioned by the single dominant gene Bv. Phytopathology 58:1710. Schultz, H. K., and L. L. Dean. 1947. Inheritance of curly top disease reaction in the bean, Phaseolus vulgaris. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 39:47-51. Thomas, H. R., and W. J. Zaumeyer. 1950. Inheritance of symptom expression of pod mottle virus. Phytopathology 40:1007-1010. Thompson, A. E., R. L. Lower, and H. H. Thornberry. 1952. Inheritance in beans of the necrotic reaction to tobacco mosaic virus. J. Heredity 63:89-91. Tu, J. 0. 1983. Inheritance in Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Kentwood of resistance to a necrotic strain of bean yellow mosaic virus and to a severe bean strain of tobacco ringspot virus. Can. J. Plant Path. 5:34-35. Wade, B. L., and W. J. Zaumeyer. 1940. Genetic studies of resistance to alfalfa mosaic virus and stringiness in Phaseolus vulgaris. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 32:127-134. Zaumeyer, W. J., and L L. Harter. 1943. Inheritance of symptom expression of bean mosaic virus 4. J. Agr. Res. 67:295-300. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Soy Free Diet Avoiding Soy
    SOY FREE DIET AVOIDING SOY An allergy to soy is common in babies and young children, studies show that often children outgrow a soy allergy by age 3 years and the majority by age 10. Soybeans are a member of the legume family; examples of other legumes include beans, peas, lentils and peanut. It is important to remember that children with a soy allergy are not necessarily allergic to other legumes, request more clarification from your allergist if you are concerned. Children with a soy allergy may have nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea, bloody stool, difficulty breathing, and or a skin reaction after eating or drinking soy products. These symptoms can be avoided by following a soy free diet. What foods are not allowed on a soy free diet? Soy beans and edamame Soy products, including tofu, miso, natto, soy sauce (including sho yu, tamari), soy milk/creamer/ice cream/yogurt, soy nuts and soy protein, tempeh, textured vegetable protein (TVP) Caution with processed foods - soy is widely used manufactured food products – remember to carefully read labels. o Soy products and derivatives can be found in many foods, including baked goods, canned tuna and meat, cereals, cookies, crackers, high-protein energy bars, drinks and snacks, infant formulas, low- fat peanut butter, processed meats, sauces, chips, canned broths and soups, condiments and salad dressings (Bragg’s Liquid Aminos) USE EXTRA CAUTION WITH ASIAN CUISINE: Asian cuisine are considered high-risk for people with soy allergy due to the common use of soy as an ingredient and the possibility of cross-contamination, even if a soy-free item is ordered.
    [Show full text]
  • Cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata) Plant Guide
    Plant Guide prevention and weed suppression. Allelopathic COWPEA compounds in the plant may help to suppress weeds (Clark, 2007). It has also been used successfully as Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. groundcover in orchards and intercropped with cash crops Plant Symbol = VIUN such as cotton. Contributed by: USDA NRCS Cape May Plant Materials Wildlife: Cowpea is eaten by deer as forage, and is Center, Cape May, NJ commonly used in food plots for deer. A variety of birds, including wild turkey, eat the seeds and the plant can be used by quail as cover. Some varieties of cowpea are used specifically for wildlife purposes (Ball et al., 2007). Ethnobotany: Cowpea has been a staple crop and important protein source for many cultures since the Roman Empire. It was the most commonly cultivated bean used for human consumption in the Old World (Allen and Allen, 1981). Roman writers such as Pliny referred to it as phaseolus. Thomas Jefferson is credited with first using the name cowpea. Today the crop is still widely popular, and good harvests are critical to ensure adequate levels of protein in the diets of populations in India and East Asia (Allen and Allen, 1981). Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). (Photo by Christopher Sheahan, USDA- NRCS, Cape May Plant Materials Center) Status Cowpea is an introduced species in the United States. It is Alternate Names native to tropical and subtropical regions. It can grow Alternate Common Names: blackeyed pea, field pea, both wild and cultivated. Please consult the PLANTS southern pea, crowder pea, caupi, catjang, yardlong bean Web site and your State Department of Natural Resources for this plant’s current status (e.g., threatened or Alternate Scientific Names: endangered species, state noxious status, and wetland Vigna sinensis (L.) Savi, indicator values).
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptation of Beans (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) to Low Phosphorus Availability Jonathan P
    Adaptation of Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to Low Phosphorus Availability Jonathan P. Lynch1 Department of Horticulture, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 Stephen E. Beebe Bean Program, International Center for Tropical Agriculture, Apartado Aéveo 6713, Cali, Colombia Phosphorus availability in native soils is seldom adequate for has been carried out in Colombia (Thung, 1990; Youngdahl, 1990), optimal plant growth. Of the macronutrients, K, Ca, Mg, and S are not Brazil [Salinas, 1978; International Center for Tropical Agriculture uncommon in the earth’s crust and in fresh water (Epstein, 1972); N is (CIAT), unpublished data], Costa Rica (Corella, unpublished data), abundant in the atmosphere and is present in most soil solutions in and Nicaragua (Tapia, 1987). In at least one case, recommendations millimolar concentrations. In contrast, P is present in soil solution and for P applications were tailored cultivar by cultivar, from 0 to 42 kg P/ fresh water in only micromolar concentrations (Rendig and Taylor, ha, depending on the P requirements of the specific genotype. The 1989), in large part because P is commonly bound to many soil Brazilian cultivar Carioca is broadly adapted to low-P conditions, and constituents that make it unavailable or only sparingly available to is extremely responsive to added P (Thung, 1990). These traits plants (Sample et al., 1980). An additional problem is that the P cycle undoubtedly contribute to the fact that ‘Carioca’ is the most widely in most terrestrial ecosystems is open-ended and tends toward deple- grown cultivar in Brazil (Janssen et al., 1992). In Rwanda, a climbing tion, unlike the N cycle, in which atmospheric pools provide continual bean from Mexico, G2333, has gained great popularity among small inputs to soil pools (Stevenson, 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • KC Refrigerated Product List 10.1.19.Indd
    Created 3.11.09 One Color White REFRIGERATEDWhite: 0C 0M 0Y 0K COLLECTION Albondigas (Mexican Meatball Soup) Black Bean Soup Butternut Squash & Apple Soup 700856 700820 VN VG DF GF 700056 GF Savory meatballs, white rice and vibrant Slow-cooked black beans, red peppers, A blend of puréed butternut squash, onions tomatoes in a handcrafted chicken stock roasted sweet corn and diced green chilies and handcrafted stock with caramelized infused with traditional Mexican aromatics in a purée of vine-ripened tomatoes with a Granny Smith apples and a pinch of fresh and a touch of fresh lime juice. splash of fresh-squeezed orange juice. nutmeg. Angus Steak Chili with Beans Black Lentil & Roasted Garlic Dahl* Caribbean Jerk Chicken Soup 700095 DF GF 701762 VG GF 700708 DF GF Tender strips of seared Angus beef, green Black beluga lentils, sautéed onions, roasted Tender chicken, sweet potatoes, carrots peppers and red beans in slow-simmered garlic and ginger slow-simmered in a rich and tomatoes in a handcrafted chicken tomatoes with Southwestern spices. tomato broth, infused with warming spices, stock with white rice, red beans, traditional finished with butter and heavy cream. jerk seasoning and a hint of molasses. Beef Barley & Vegetable Soup Broccoli Cheddar Soup Carrot Ginger Soup 700023 700063 VG GF 700071 VN VG DF GF Seared strips of lean beef and pearl barley Delicately puréed broccoli and sautéed Sweet carrots puréed with fresh-squeezed with red peppers, mushrooms, peas, onions in a rich blend of extra sharp orange juice, hand-peeled ginger and tomatoes and green beans in a rich cheddar cheese and light cream with a sautéed onions with a touch of toasted beef stock.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Peas
    Agriculture and Natural Resources FSA6020 Home Gardening Series Southern Peas Craig R. Andersen Environment Associate Professor and Extension Specialist - Light Soil Vegetables Fertility pH Temperature Moisture – sunny – well­drained loam Culture– medium to light – 5.8 to 7.0 Planting – warm season Spacing – average to drought Hardiness resistant Cultural Practices Fertilizer Soils Southern Peas – Vigna unguiculata– seed 1 inch deep – 2 x 24 inches – tender annual – light Southern peas adapt to many soil types; medium fertility with pH of 5.8 to 7.0 is desirable. High fertility pro­Planting Time The southern pea, also known as duces excessive vine growth and poor the cowpea, is thought to have origi­ yields. N­fixing bacteria inoculants nated in Africa, where it has been may increase yield especially in soils eaten for centuries. It traveled to where peas have not been grown. Egypt as long as 3,000 years ago and was common to the European and Asian diets. Southern peas were prob­ ably brought to the West Indies in the Plant southern peas after the soil 17th century. They later became a is thoroughly warm (62 degrees F common food in the United States. or greater) in late spring or early One of the more popular ways of cook­ summer. This vegetable is very toler­ ing black­eyed peas is a dish called Spacingant to hot weather and can be planted and Depth of Planting “Hoppin’ John,” a traditional African­ throughout the summer with very American dish served on New Year’s good results. For fall planting, plant Day for good luck.
    [Show full text]
  • Product List Winter 2020/21 2 Winter 2020/21 Winter 2017 3
    Product List Winter 2020/21 2 Winter 2020/21 Winter 2017 3 Contents Large and Small meals Large and Small Meals Textured Modified A huge selection of mains, soups, Savoury Pastries 04 Level 3 (Liquidised) 22 sides and desserts – created to Breakfast 04 Level 4 (Puréed) 22 sustain and nourish patients. Soups 05 Level 4 (Purée Petite) 25 Main meals – Meat Level 5 (Minced & Moist) 26 • Beef 06 Level 6 (Soft & Bite-Sized) 27 • Poultry 06 • Pork 08 • Other Meat 08 Special Diets • Lamb & Mutton 09 Gluten free 29 Main Meals - Fish 09 Free From 30 Main Meals - Vegetarian 10 Mini Meals Extra 31 Sides Energy dense 32 • Accompaniments 11 Low & Reduced Sugars Individual Desserts 32 • Vegetables 12 Finger Foods 33 • Potatoes and Rice 13 Desserts Ethnic Meals • Hot Desserts 14 Kosher Meals 35 • Cold Desserts 16 Kosher Desserts 35 • Cakes 16 Caribbean & West Indian Meals 36 Asian Halal Meals 37 CarteChoix Asian Halal Vegetarian Meals 38 Main meals – Meat • Beef 18 Dietary Codes 39 • Lamb 18 • Poultry 18 • Pork 18 Main Meals - Fish 18 Main Meals - Vegetarian 18 Main Meals - iWave Recommended 19 Desserts • Hot desserts 19 Making food that tastes great and aids patient recovery has been our mission from day one. It’s what our registered dietitian and team of qualified chefs work tirelessly for. Whatever a patient’s dietary needs, ethnic preference or taste, it’s about offering them something good to eat. Our Dietitian, Emily Stuart, is a healthcare expert as well as a member Minced Beef Hotpot : 324112 of the BDA 4 Winter 2020/21 Large and Small Meals Winter
    [Show full text]
  • Five Multiple-Virus-Resistant Common Bean Breeding Lines
    CULTIVAR & GERMPLASM RELEASES HORTSCIENCE 30(6):1320–1323. 1995. Provvidenti, 1987a). B-21 carries resistance to BCMV, BYMV (Dickson and Natti, 1968), BlCMV, cowpea aphid-borne mosaic virus Five Multiple-virus-resistant Common (CABMV) (Provvidenti et al., 1983), TMV (Thompson et al., 1962), and WMV Bean Breeding Lines (Provvidenti, 1974) as governed by the I, By- 2, Bcm, Cam, Tm, and Hsw genes, respectively B. Scully1 (Kyle and Provvidenti, 1993; Provvidenti et Everglades Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 3200 East al., 1989). B-21 also is resistant to PeMV (unpublished data). In B-21, the I gene confers Palm Beach Road, Belle Glade, FL 33430-8003 resistance to BCMV pathogenicity groups I, R. Provvidenti2 II, IVa, Va, Vb, and VII and high-temperature- sensitive resistance to groups III, IVb, VIa, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Cornell University, Geneva, VIb (Drijfhout, 1978). The BCMV reaction NY 14456 profile of GN-1140 is equivalent to the differ- 3 ential GN-123, including tolerance to patho- D. Benscher genicity groups VIa and VIb; resistance to Tropical Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 18905 South pathotypes I, II, III, Va, and Vb; and suscepti- West 280 Street, Homestead, FL 33031-3314 bility to groups IVa, IVb, and VII as condi- tioned by bc-u and bc-12 (Table 1). When the 4 D.E. Halseth I gene is coupled with these recessive alleles, Department of Fruit and Vegetable Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, tolerance or resistance is expanded to more NY 14853 BCMV pathotypes, and these genotypes are protected against systemic hypersensitive ne- J.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Aphid Transmission of Potyvirus: the Largest Plant-Infecting RNA Virus Genus
    Supplementary Aphid Transmission of Potyvirus: The Largest Plant-Infecting RNA Virus Genus Kiran R. Gadhave 1,2,*,†, Saurabh Gautam 3,†, David A. Rasmussen 2 and Rajagopalbabu Srinivasan 3 1 Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA 2 Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]. † Authors contributed equally. Received: 13 May 2020; Accepted: 15 July 2020; Published: date Abstract: Potyviruses are the largest group of plant infecting RNA viruses that cause significant losses in a wide range of crops across the globe. The majority of viruses in the genus Potyvirus are transmitted by aphids in a non-persistent, non-circulative manner and have been extensively studied vis-à-vis their structure, taxonomy, evolution, diagnosis, transmission and molecular interactions with hosts. This comprehensive review exclusively discusses potyviruses and their transmission by aphid vectors, specifically in the light of several virus, aphid and plant factors, and how their interplay influences potyviral binding in aphids, aphid behavior and fitness, host plant biochemistry, virus epidemics, and transmission bottlenecks. We present the heatmap of the global distribution of potyvirus species, variation in the potyviral coat protein gene, and top aphid vectors of potyviruses. Lastly, we examine how the fundamental understanding of these multi-partite interactions through multi-omics approaches is already contributing to, and can have future implications for, devising effective and sustainable management strategies against aphid- transmitted potyviruses to global agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Extension Methods and Their Implications on Crop Yield in a Maize
    Extension Methods and their Implications on Crop Yield in a Maize – Legume Conservation Agriculture Project in Zambia Kafula Chisanga1, Nswana Kafwamfwa1, Petan Hamazakaza2, Mulundu Mwila3, Joy Sinyangwe4, Olipa Lungu5 1Zambia Agriculture Research Institute (ZARI), Mochipapa Research Station, P.O. Box 630090, Choma, 2Zambia Agriculture Research Institute, Kabwe Research Station, P.O. Box 80908 Kabwe, 3Zambia Agriculture Research Institute, Msekera Research Station, P.O. Box 510046 Chipata, 4Department of Agriculture, Mulungushi House, 10101, Lusaka, 5University of Zambia, Department of Soil Science, P.O. Box 32379 Lusaka (Corresponding author: [email protected]) Introduction Methods Results Figure # 1 Comparison of mean maize yield results across sites (kg/ha) for two seasons; • Conservation Agriculture (CA) is one of the Table #1 Maize yield results across sites (kg/ha) for 2014/15 and 2015/16 based on extension • Participatory Action Research (PAR) sustainable intensification technologies that is 2014/15 season delivery approach through consensus building Treatments Chipata Monze Mpongwe increasingly promoted by various international 5000 (T1) PP + M + 2811 4341 3619 meetings with farmers and key partner 4500 research centres, international non- FRF organizations (T2) PP + M + D 1605 3665 2700 4000 governmental organizations (NGOs), faith Comp 3500 (T3) PP + M + 2219 3480 2577 3000 based organizations and governments of HRF • Field demonstrations of crops; maize, 2500 (T4) GN + M + 3038 4469 3204 southern Africa among others 2000
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Detection of Bean Yellow Mosaic Virus in Lupinus Albus
    ls & vira An ti ti n re A t r f o o v l Barakat and Torky, J Antivir Antiretrovir 2017, 9:2 i r a a Journal of n l r s u DOI: 10.4172/1948-5964.1000159 o J ISSN: 1948-5964 Antivirals & Antiretrovirals Research Article Article Open Access Molecular Detection of Bean Yellow Mosaic Virus in Lupinus albus Plants and its Associated Alterations in Biochemical and Physiological Parameters Ahmed Barakat and Zenab Aly Torky* Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Egypt Abstract Bean yellow mosaic virus is one of the most devastating diseases of cultivated Leguminosae plants worldwide causing mosaic, mottling, malformation and distortion in infected cultivar plants. Present study was conducted to investigate the possibility of infection of Lupinus albus (Lupine) with Bean yellow mosaic virus. Virus isolate was identified by detection of the coat protein gene amplified by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and also via Chenopodium Amaranticolor as a diagnostic host plant. Results showed that infection can be induced under greenhouse conditions and infected plants showed a considerable level of mosaic symptoms. As disease development in infected plants is always associated with physiological and chemical changes, some metabolic alterations parameters have been evaluated like photosynthetic pigment contents, total carbohydrate content, total soluble protein, total protein, total free amino acid, proline induction, total phenolics, salicylic acid, and abscisic acid content in healthy and infected lupine plants. Results showed a great variation in all the biochemical categories in Lupinus albus infected with bean yellow mosaic virus as compared to healthy plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Peas Lettuce Radish Basil Pot Blueberries Broccoli Carrots
    Gazette Know Your Farmer … Know Your Food Wightmans Farm CSA 2015 Week 4 Welcome to week 4! If you are a Tues or Fri pick up (at the farm) you do NOT have to email or THE call if you are picking up the next day. However, please pick up BEFORE 12 Wednesday or Sat- urday. FLOWERS & HERBS! Unfortunately we still have at least 2 more weeks. Mother Nature was cruel this winter and they are not there yet…(for PYO) the herbs may be ready earlier, I will let you know one week prior to picking! Our Own Broccoli Cheese Yumminess! 1 large onion, chopped Peas 3 tablespoons vegetable oil Our Own 4 eggs, lightly beaten 4 cups chopped fresh broccoli, cooked Lettuce 2 cups (8 ounces) shredded mozzarella cheese Our Own 1 carton (15 ounces) ricotta cheese 1/3 cup grated Parmesan cheese Radish 1/4 teaspoon salt Dash ground nutmeg Our Own 1 unbaked pie pastry (9 inches) Cucumber In a skillet, sauté onion in oil until tender, about 5 minutes. Transfer to a large bowl; add eggs, broccoli, cheeses, salt and nutmeg. Pour into pie shell. Bake at 350° for 50-55 minutes or until Our Own a knife inserted near the center comes out clean. Yield: 6-8 servings. Broccoli & Carrot Slaw Basil Pot Ingredients: 2 Carrots Blueberries 1 small head Broccoli (with Stem) 1/4 cup Red Onion, finely chopped 1/2 cup Raisins (soaked in warm water before use) Broccoli 1/4 cup dry roasted Pumpkin Seeds Squeeze of lemon juice Carrots For the Greek Yogurt mayo: 2/3 cup nonfat plain Greek Yogurt 1/2-1 tbsp dijon mustard Squash 1/2 tsp garlic powder salt and pepper, to taste Sprouts 1 tbsp freshly squeezed lemon juice Wightman’s Farms1111 Mount Kemble Ave, Morristown NJ Instructions fin topping.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Deficit Effects on Root Distribution of Soybean, Field Pea and Chickpea
    Field Crops Research 97 (2006) 248–253 www.elsevier.com/locate/fcr Water deficit effects on root distribution of soybean, field pea and chickpea J.G. Benjamin *, D.C. Nielsen USDA-ARS, Central Great Plains Research Station, 40335 Co. Rd. GG, Akron, CO 80720, USA Received 23 September 2005; accepted 15 October 2005 Abstract Cropping diversity in the central Great Plains of the United States could be increased by including suitable legumes in crop rotations. Water is limiting to all crops grown in this region and agronomic crops frequently experience water deficit stress during their life cycle. The ability of a plant to change its root distribution to exploit deeper stored soil water may be an important mechanism to avoid drought stress. An experiment was conducted to examine legume root system response to water deficit stress. Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), field pea (Pisum sativum L.), and soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) were grown at two water regimes: under natural rainfall conditions and irrigated to minimize water deficit stress. Root distributions for each species were measured at 0.23 m depth intervals to a depth of 1.12 m directly beneath the plants at the late bloom and mid pod fill growth stages. Roots were washed free of soil and were separated from soil debris by hand. Root surface area measurements were made and root weights were recorded for each depth interval. Water deficit did not affect the relative soybean root distribution. Approximately 97% of the total soybean roots were in the surface 0.23 m at both sampling times and under both water regimes.
    [Show full text]