DOCSLIB.ORG

REBECCA KUKLA Curriculum Vitae – September 2014 [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
REBECCA KUKLA Curriculum Vitae – September 2014 Rkukla@Gmail.Com REBECCA KUKLA Curriculum Vitae – September 2014 [email protected] Professor of Philosophy Senior Research Scholar, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Georgetown University Washington, DC, USA EDUCATION Greenwall Postdoctoral Fellowship in Bioethics and Health Policy, Johns Hopkins University, 2003-05 Ph.D., Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh, 1996 Dissertation: Creativity, Conformity, and the Social Constitution of the Subject. Director: John Haugeland. Committee: David Gauthier, Iris Young, Jennifer Whiting, Michael Thompson Honours B.A. (With High Distinction), Philosophy, University of Toronto, 1990 AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Social epistemology, philosophy of language, bioethics, philosophy of medicine and the special sciences, feminist philosophy. AREAS OF COMPETENCE Rousseau, Kant, metaethics, philosophy of mind, aesthetics, twentieth century European philosophy. PROFESSIONAL HONOURS AND AWARDS 2009 University of South Florida Creative Scholarship Award (honorary – monetary award declined) 2006-07 Canadian Philosophical Association Biennial Book Prize: Honourable Mention for Mass Hysteria: Medicine, Culture, and Mothers’ Bodies 2006-07 Marston LaFrance Research Fellow (annual award to the top researcher in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Carleton University) 2003-05 Greenwall Fellowship in Bioethics and Health Policy, Johns Hopkins University 2000-01 Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Award for Teaching Excellence, Carleton University 1990-92 (Honorary fellow for 1994-5) National Mellon Fellowship in the Humanities FORMER ACADEMIC POSITIONS, INCLUDING INVITED VISITING POSITIONS 2011- Adjunct Professor of Philosophy, New College of Florida 2007-11 Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of South Florida (2007-10: Also Professor in the School of Medicine) 2007-10 Senior Research Fellow in Philosophy, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON 2000-07 Associate Professor (with tenure), Department of Philosophy, Carleton University (cross- appointed in Political Science 2000-2006), Ottawa, ON Kukla (1) 2003-04 Visiting Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy and Department of Population and Family Health Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 2002-05 Visiting Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 2002 Visiting Scholar, Department of Philosophy, University of Victoria 1998-00 Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Carleton University (cross-appointed in Political Science 1999-2000) 1997-98 Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of New Mexico 1995-97 Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Oregon 1993-95 Instructor, Department of Philosophy, Middlebury College 1991-93 Teaching Fellow, Department of Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh 1988-90 Teaching Assistant, Department of Philosophy, University of Toronto PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS IN BIOETHICS/APPLIED ETHICS 2011 Expert Witness for the Plaintiffs, Nova Health Systems v. Pruitt, 292 P.3d (Oklahoma 2012) 2008-10 Member, Institutional Review Board, University of South Florida – Health 2007-10 Bioethics Advisory Committee Member, Oncofertility Consortium 2005-07 Executive Board Member, Carleton University Centre on Ethics and Values 2005-07 Member, Research Ethics Board, Carleton University 2004 Hospital Ethics Committee Guest Member, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Fall 2004 2004 Visiting Scholar and Research Ethics Consultant, United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Services Office, Food and Nutrition Assistance Research Program GRANTS AND OTHER RESEARCH FUNDING 2009 Queen’s University Internal Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) ‘4A’ Research Award, $5000 2009 Univ. of South Florida Humanities Institute Research Award, “Recognizing Norms,” $5000 2006-9 SSHRC Standard Research Grant, “Autonomy and the Negotiation of Information in Reproductive Health Care,” $100,565 2005 Carleton University, “Representations of Risk in Obstetrics,” $4000 2000 SSHRC, “Science as Social Practice,” $2600 1999 SSHRC, “Myth, Memory and Misrecognition in Epistemology,” $3000 1998 SSHRC, “Myth, Memory and Misrecognition in Epistemology,” $3000 1997 National Endowment for the Humanities, $1200 U.S. + travel/living, summer research institute on Background Practices, UC-Santa Cruz 1994 National Endowment for the Humanities, $1400 U.S. + travel/living, summer research institute on Embodiment, UC-Santa Cruz 1991 Mellon Fellowship for Summer Language Study (French, La Pocatière, Quebec) PUBLICATIONS Books: R. Kukla and M. Lance, ‘Yo!’ and ‘Lo!’: The Pragmatic Topography of the Space of Reasons (Cambridge: Harvard University Press 2009). Kukla (2) R. Kukla (editor), Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy (New York: Cambridge University Press 2006). R. Kukla, Mass Hysteria: Medicine, Culture and Mothers’ Bodies (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield 2005). J. Arras, R. Kukla, and E. Fenton (editors), A Companion to Bioethics Routledge, forthcoming 2014. Articles in Refereed Journals: S. Richardson, C. Daniels, M. Gillman, J. Golden, R. Kukla, C. Kuzawa, and J. Rich-Edwards, “Developmental Biology: Don’t Blame the Mothers,” Nature 512:7513, August 13, 2014. R. Kukla and S. Hardy, “Making Sense of Miscarriage Online,” forthcoming in a special issue of Journal of Social Philosophy on miscarriage, ed. K. Norlock, 2015. R. Kukla and M. Lance, “Intersubjectivity and Receptive Experience,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 52:1, 2014, 22-42. E. Winsberg, B. Huebner, and R. Kukla, “Accountability and Values in Radically Collaborative Research,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 2013, online preprint http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2013.11.007. R. Kukla, “Living with Pirates: Common Morality and Embodied Practice,” target article in Cambridge Quarterly of Health Care Ethics, 23:1, 2014, 76-86. • Critical responses by Tom Beauchamp and Carson Strong, and my reply to them. Lance, M. and Kukla, R., “’Leave the Gun; Take the Cannoli!’: The Pragmatic Topography of Second- Person Calls,” Ethics 123:3, 2013, 456-78. R. Kukla, “'Author TBD': Radical Collaboration in Contemporary Biomedical Research,” Philosophy of Science, 79:5, 2012, 845-858. R. Kukla, “Performative Force, Convention, and Discursive Injustice,” Hypatia, 2012, 27:3, 1-17. R. Kukla, “The Ethics and Cultural Politics of Reproductive Health Warnings: A Case Study of Proposition 65,” Health, Risk and Society 12:4, 2010, 323-334. A. D. Lyerly, L. Mitchell, E. M. Armstrong, L. Harris, R. Kukla, M. Kuppermann, and M. Little (The Obstetrics and Gynecology Risk Research Group), “Risk and the Pregnant Body,” Hastings Center Report 39:6, 2009, 34-42. R. Kukla, M. Kuppermann, M. Little, A. D. Lyerly, L. M. Mitchell, E. M. Armstrong, and L. H. Harris (The Obstetrics and Gynecology Risk Research Group), “Finding Autonomy in Birth,” Bioethics 23:1, 2009, 1-8. Kukla (3) M. Little, A. D. Lyerly, L. Mitchell, E. M. Armstrong, L. Harris, R. Kukla, and M. Kuppermann (The Obstetrics and Gynecology Risk Research Group), “Mode of Delivery: Toward Responsible Inclusion of Patient Preferences,” Obstetrics and Gynecology 112:4, 2008, 913-18. • Response letter and reply published in Obstetrics and Gynecology 113:1, 2009, 230-231. R. Kukla, “Measuring Mothering,” International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1:1, 2008, 67-90. R. Kukla, “Naturalizing Objectivity,” Critical Review of L. Daston and P. Galison, Objectivity, and K. Barad, Meeting the Universe Halfway,” Perspectives on Science 16:3, 2008, 285-302. R. Kukla, “Resituating the Principle of Equipoise: Justice and Access to Care in Non-Ideal Conditions,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17:3, 2007, 171-202. R. Kukla, “Holding the Body of Another,” in Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 11:2, 2007, 397-408. R. Kukla, “How do Patients Know?,” Hastings Center Report 37:5, 2007, 27-35. A. D. Lyerly, L. M. Mitchell, E. M. Armstrong, L. H. Harris, R. Kukla, M. Kuppermann, and M. Little (The Obstetrics and Gynecology Risk Research Group), “Risk, Values, and Decision Making Surrounding Pregnancy,” Obstetrics and Gynecology 109:4, 2007, 979-984. R. Kukla, “Objectivity and Perspective in Empirical Knowledge,” Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 3:1, 2006, 80-95. R. Kukla, “Ethics and Ideology in Breastfeeding Advocacy Campaigns,” Hypatia 21:1, 2006, 157-80. R. Kukla, “Conscientious Autonomy: Displacing Decisions in Health Care,” Hastings Center Report 35:2, 2005, 34-44. • Response letters by Tom Beauchamp, Carole Browner, Hilde Lindemann and Carolyn McLeod, together with my reply, published in Hastings Center Report 35:5, 2005. R. Kukla, “The Limits of Lines: Negotiating Hard Medical Choices,” American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Medicine 5:1, 2005, 15-19. R. Kukla, “The Antinomies of Impure Reason: Rousseau and Kant on the Metaphysics of Truth-Telling,” Inquiry 48:3, 2005, 203-31. R. Kukla, “Attention and Blindness: Objectivity and Contingency in Moral Perception,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy supplementary volume 28, 2003, 319-46. R. Kukla and L. Ruetsche, “Contingent Natures and Virtuous Knowers: Could Epistemology be ‘Gendered’?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32:3, 2002, 389-418. R. Kukla, “The Ontology and Temporality of Conscience,” Continental Philosophy Review 35, 2002, 1-34. Kukla (4) R. Kukla, “Talking Back: Monstrosity, Mundanity and Cynicism in Television Talk Shows,” Rethinking Marxism 14:1, 2002, 67-96. R. Kukla, “Myth, Memory and Misrecognition in Sellars’ ‘Empiricism
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Curriculum Vitæ Hans Halvorson
    Curriculum Vitæ Hans Halvorson Department of Philosophy Princeton University Princeton, NJ 08544 www.princeton.edu/~hhalvors Permanent positions 2010{ Professor, Princeton 2005{10 Associate Professor with Tenure, Princeton 2001{05 Assistant Professor, Princeton Temporary positions 2008{09 Visiting Researcher, Mathematical Institute, Utrecht (group of Ieke Moerdijk) 2006 Visiting Fellow, Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics Education 2001 PhD, Philosophy, Pittsburgh 1998 MA, Mathematics, Pittsburgh 1997 MA, Philosophy, Pittsburgh 1995 BA (honors), Philosophy, Calvin College Research focus Category Theory (especially Categorical Logic), Philosophy of Physics Areas of special competence Philosophical Logic, Philosophy of Mathematics, Philosophy of Religion, Philosophy of Science Work in progress (selected) HH, \Essay review of Interpreting Quantum Theories," for Metascience. HH and Klaas Landsman, \Multiply connected spaces and identical particles." HH, \Does quantum mechanics kill time?" David Baker and HH, \How is spontaneous symmetry breaking possible?" HH and Noel Swanson, \Natural structure on state space" HH and Jim Weatherall, \What is a scientific theory?" Published articles HH. \What scientific theories could not be," forthcoming in Philosophy of Science. HH and Helge Kragh. \Theism and physical cosmology," forthcoming in The Routledge Companion to Theism, edited by C. Taliaferro. Routledge 2012. HH and Helge Kragh. \Cosmology and theology," Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2011 Edition. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cosmology-theology/ HH. \The measure of all things: quantum mechanics and the soul." In The soul hypothesis: investigations into the existence of the soul edited by M. Baker and S. Goetz, pp. 138{163. Continuum Press 2010. Dave Baker and HH. \Antimatter." The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61:93{121, 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Bulletin
    Volume 13 U N I V E R S I T Y OF P I T T S B U R G H B U L AUGUSTL E T 2005I N NOTES FROM THE DIRECTOR 22. It was a great pleasure for Rutgers University) and I joined me to be involved in both. forces to organize a conference October 1-3 celebrating the During my eight years as Cen- contributions of our dear friend ter Director I have had the great Allan Gotthelf to the under- pleasure of working with standing of the philosophy and Gereon Wolters of Konstanz science of classical Greece. The and Peter Machamer of Pitts- program and pictures of the burgh (and their committees) event can be found on the on four Pittsburgh-Konstanz Center's web site among the Colloquia. May 26-30, 2005 Archived Events. Allan is cur- was our seventh, held in rently Visiting Professor of His- BULLETINBULLETIN Konstanz, as is fitting, given tory and Philosophy of Science that one of the architects of this thanks to a fellowship provided Table of Contents warm, multi-faceted coop- by the Anthem Foundation for erative venture, Jürgen the Study of Objectivism. 3 Visiting Fellows 2004-05 Jim Lennox Mittelstrass, retires this year. 6 In Memoriam: Ernst Mayr For the first time the event was October 12-14 we once again 7 Anjan Chakravartty he completion of my staged in the historic heart of co-sponsored the Nagel Lec- second (and final!) Konstanz, in the city's Cultural tures, organized every two years 8 In Memoriam: Eduardo H.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Philosophy News Fall 2014 for Friends, Alumni, Alumnae of the Department of Philosophy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
    Michigan Philosophy News Fall 2014 For friends, alumni, alumnae of the Department of Philosophy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor INSIDE THIS ISSUE Graduate and Undergraduate News Faculty Articles Recent Graduates Contributions Dear Friends of Michigan Philosophy, I write to you as the new Chair of Philosophy, succeeding Laura Ruetsche, who has gleefully passed the baton to me and is now enjoying a richly deserved sabbatical. I have been a faculty member in the Philosophy Department since 1987. I have chosen to build my career at University of Michigan because I have found it to be an unsurpassed place to be practicing and teaching philosophy at every level. I have never seen the Department in better shape than now. This owes a lot to Laura’s selfless service. It is an honor to have the support of my wonderful colleagues as I assume my duties as Chair, and a relief to take up those duties in a Department in such fine condition. Before we move on to our field reports from our faculty and graduate students, I’d like to share with you some Departmental news highlights. Faculty News This year Derrick Darby joins us as part of our permanent faculty, after spending a term here in Winter 2013. Derrick comes to us from University of Kansas, with specialties in social, political, and legal philosophy and philosophy of race. I taught his stimulating book, Rights, Race, and Recognition (Cambridge UP, 2009) in my advanced political philosophy class, where it was a hit with my students. In keeping with UM’s interdisciplinary culture, Derrick’s current research on race, educational equity, and the racial achievement gap lies at the intersection of philosophy, American history, and law.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Interpret Quantum Physics?
    Open Journal of Philosophy, 2016, 6, 86-102 Published Online February 2016 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojpp http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2016.61009 Why Interpret Quantum Physics? Edward MacKinnon Philosophy Department (Emeritus), California State University East Bay, Hayward, CA, USA Received 22 December 2015; accepted 19 February 2016; published 22 February 2016 Copyright © 2016 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract This article probes the question of what interpretations of quantum mechanics actually accom- plish. In other domains, which are briefly considered, interpretations serve to make alien syste- matizations intelligible to us. This often involves clarifying the status of their implicit ontology. A survey of interpretations of non-relativistic quantum mechanics supports the evaluation that these interpretations make a contribution to philosophy, but not to physics. Interpretations of quantum field theory are polarized by the divergence between the Lagrangian field theory, which leads to the Standard Model of Particle physics and the Algebraic quantum field theory that dis- counts an ontology of particles. Ruetsche’s interpretation offers a potential for loosening the sharp polarization that presently obtains. A brief evaluation focuses on the functional ontology of quan- tum field theory considered as an effective theory. Keywords Interpretation, Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Field Theory, Ontology 1. Introduction Interpreting quantum mechanics has flourished as a cottage industry among philosophers of science and some philosophically inclined physicists. Physicists regularly ignore, and sometimes ridicule, such attempts. This gap between interpretation and practice raises reflective questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Structure and Empirical Content Michael E. Miller†
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Philsci-Archive Mathematical Structure and Empirical Content Michael E. Millery Approaches to the interpretation of physical theories provide accounts of how physical meaning accrues to the mathematical structure of a theory. According to many standard approaches to interpretation, meaning relations are captured by maps from the mathemat- ical structure of the theory to statements expressing its empirical content. In this paper I argue that while such accounts adequately address meaning relations when exact models are available or perturbation theory converges, they do not fare as well for models that give rise to divergent perturbative expansions. Since truncations of divergent perturbative expansions often play a critical role in establishing the empirical adequacy of a theory, this is a serious deficiency. I show how to augment state-space semantics, a view developed by Beth and van Fraassen, to capture perturbatively evaluated observables even in cases where perturbation theory is divergent. This new semantics establishes a sense in which the calculations that underwrite the empirical adequacy of a theory are both meaningful and true, but requires departure from the assumption that physical meaning is captured entirely by the exact models of a theory. 1. Introduction. Accounts of the interpretation of physical theories have developed in conjunction with, and in several important cases are attendant to, accounts of the structure of scientific theories. In other cases novel com- mitments about interpretation are tacitly adopted in the work of those in- terpreting particular physical theories. While there are significant differences between the accounts, many share a common set of commitments.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Science and to Transform These Spotlights in Time Inspire Our Future Success and Development
    Table of Contents Overview of the First 40 Years ... 00 • • 00 •••• 00 •• 00 •• 00 00. 2 Annual Lecture Series, 1960-2002 ..................... 6 Visiting Fellows and Scholars Program ........... 14 Lunchtime Colloquium .................................... 17 Conferences and Workshops .. ... .... ................... 18 Public Lecture Series ........................................ 26 Advisory Board .......... .. .... .. .. ............... :... ........ 00 26 Resident Fellows and Associates .. ............... .. ... 27 Center Publications ... ............... .. .. .. .... ... ... ........ 2 8 Archives of Scientific Philosophy in the 20th Century .............................. ............ 30 Major Funding Sources ... ................................. 31 CENTER CHRONOLOGY • In 2001-2002, the Center for Philosophy of Scie nce celebrates 40 years of in· 9/1/60 Acaaemic Vice CHancellor Ctiarles• H. Peak:e appoints Aaolf Grun- novation and accomplishment. The timeline included here highlights many baum as Andrew Mellon Professor of Philosophy with a twin mandate to of the Center's remarkable achievements and most memorable moments. establish a first-class center for philosophy of science and to transform These spotlights in time inspire our future success and development. the Department of Philosof:!hy into a leading department in the country. Andrew Mellon chair in philosophy to an unusually promis­ rated sixd1 in one category and eighth d1e main foci of Griinbaum's administra­ ing young scholar, someone so young that the age d1reshold in a second. In a confidential report tion. He relinquished his adnlinistrative of forty years for the Mellon Professorships had to be waived prepared in August 1965 for the Pitt appointment as Center Director in 1978 in order to secure Griinbaum for the chair. Perhaps no ap­ University Study Committee, Philosophy when he became its first chairman, a posi­ pointment at any university has returned greater dividends was among three departments identi- tion he continues to hold.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 APA Eastern Division Meeting Program
    The American Philosophical Association EASTERN DIVISION ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH ANNUAL MEETING PROGRAM VIRTUAL MEETING JANUARY 7 – 9, 2021 AND JANUARY 14 – 16, 2021 Use Coupon Code ZAPE21 to Save 30% (PB)/50% (HC) THROUGH FEBRUARY 16, 2021 ORDER ONLINE AT WWW.SUNYPRESS.EDU Critique in German Philosophy The Aesthetic Clinic From Kant to Critical Theory Feminine Sublimation in Contemporary María del Rosario Acosta López and Writing, Psychoanalysis, and Art J. Colin McQuillan, editors Fernanda Negrete The Primary Way The Disintegration of Community Philosophy of Yijing On Jorge Portilla’s Social and Political Chung-ying Cheng Philosophy, With Translations Foreword by Robert Cummings Neville of Selected Essays Carlos Alberto Sánchez and Jouissance Francisco Gallegos, editors A Lacanian Concept Néstor A. Braunstein Endangered Excellence Translation and Introduction by On the Political Philosophy of Aristotle Silvia Rosman Pierre Pellegrin Translated by Anthony Preus Epistemic Responsibility Lorraine Code A World Not Made for Us Topics in Critical Environmental Philosophy Manufactured Uncertainty Keith R. Peterson Implications for Climate Change Skepticism Recovering the Liberal Spirit Lorraine Code Nietzsche, Individuality, and Spiritual Freedom On Metaphysical Necessity Steven F. Pittz Essays on God, the World, Morality, and Democracy Adult Life Franklin I. Gamwell Aging, Responsibility, and the Pursuit of Happiness Carl Schmitt between John Russon Technological Rationality and Theology Modernity as Exception The Position and Meaning and Miracle
    [Show full text]
  • Why Interpret Quantum Physics?
    Open Journal of Philosophy, 2016, 6, 86-102 Published Online February 2016 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojpp doi Why Interpret Quantum Physics? Edward MacKinnon Philosophy Department (Emeritus), California State University East Bay, Hayward, CA, USA Received **** 2016 Copyright © 2016 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract This article probes the question of what interpretations of quantum mechanics actually accom- plish. In other domains, which are briefly considered, interpretations serve to make alien syste- matizations intelligible to us. This often involves clarifying the status of their implicit ontology. A survey of interpretations of non-relativistic quantum mechanics supports the evaluation that these interpretations make a contribution to philosophy, but not to physics. Interpretations of quantum field theory are polarized by the divergence between the Lagrangian field theory, which leads to the Standard Model of Particle physics and the Algebraic quantum field theory that dis- counts an ontology of particles. Ruetsche’s interpretation offers a potential for loosening the sharp polarization that presently obtains. A brief evaluation focuses on the functional ontology of quan- tum field theory considered as an effective theory. Keywords Interpretation, Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Field Theory, Ontology 1. Introduction Interpreting quantum mechanics has flourished as a cottage industry among philosophers of science and some philosophically inclined physicists. Physicists regularly ignore, and sometimes ridicule, such attempts. This gap between interpretation and practice raises reflective questions. What does an interpretation add to the item inter- preted? What standards are there for judging the success of an interpretation? A brief consideration of other areas where interpretation makes a recognized contribution can supply a preliminary guide.
    [Show full text]
  • What Should Philosophers of Science Learn from the History of the Electron?
    What Should Philosophers of Science Learn From the History of the Electron? Jonathan Bain and John D. Norton* Department of History and Philosophy of Science University of Pittsburgh 1. Introduction We have now celebrated the centenary of J. J. Thomson’s famous paper (1897) on the electron and have examined one hundred years of the history of our first fundamental particle. What should philosophers of science learn from this history? To some, the fundamental moral is already suggested by the rapid pace of this history. Thomson’s concern in 1897 was to demonstrate that cathode rays are electrified particles and not aetherial vibrations, the latter being the “almost unanimous opinion of German physicists” (p. 293) But were these German physicists so easily vanquished? De Broglie proposed in 1923 that electrons are a wave phenomenon after all and his proposal was soon multiply vindicated, even by the detection of the diffraction of the electron waves. Should we not learn from such a reversal? Should we not dispense with the simple-minded idea that Thomson discovered our first fundamental particle and admit that the very notion of discovery might well be ill-suited to science? Our purpose in this paper is to argue at length that this sort of skepticism is hasty and wholly unwarranted. Nevertheless a more detailed examination of the history of the electron can give further encouragement to these skeptical smolderings. The transition from classical corpuscle to quantum wave was just the most prominent of the many transformations of our theories of the electron over the last century. Thomson’s electron of 1897 was a charged, massive corpuscle--an electrified particle--obeying Newtonian dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • An Aristotelian Interpretation of Quantum Termodynamics and Chemistry1
    © 2017, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly doi: Online First: Hylomorphic Escalation: An Aristotelian Interpretation of Quantum Termodynamics and Chemistry1 Robert C. Koons Abstract. Defenders of physicalism often point to the reduction of chemistry to quantum physics as a paradigm for the reduction of the rest of reality to a microphysical foundation. Tis argument is based, however, on a misreading of the philosophical signifcance of the quantum revolution. A hylomorphic (from Aristotle’s concepts of hyle, matter, and morphe, form) interpretation of quantum thermodynamics and chemistry, in which parts and wholes stand in a mutually determining relationship, better fts both the empirical facts and the actual practice of scientists. I argue that only a hylomorphic interpretation of quantum mechanics (QM) is able to treat thermodynamic quantities, such as temperature and entropy, as genuinely real, which in turn provides grounds for the reality of the direction of time and of molecular structure. I. Introduction ristotelian philosophy of nature has always privileged substantial wholes over their microscopic parts, in contrast to the bottom-up microphysicalist paradigm that dominated physics and chemistry in theA modern era. Te quantum revolution has paved the way for a revival of the Aristotelian category of substantial form as a top-down factor in the struc- turing of physical and chemical phenomena. In this paper, I will propose that fnite quantum systems constitute the proximate matter for thermal substances, each with its own substantial form. I will not discuss prime matter or Aquinas’s signate matter in this context, although nothing that I propose would block the introduction of such entities as the ultimate substrates of material reality.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    GORDON BELOT Department of Philosophy 2002 Frieze Ave. University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48104 Ann Arbor, MI 48109 [email protected] DEGREES 1996 Ph.D., Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh 1993 M.Sc., Mathematics, University of Toronto 1991 B.Sc., Mathematics and Philosophy, University of Toronto ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS University of Michigan 2019– Lawrence Sklar Collegiate Professor of Philosophy 2008–2019 Professor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2004–2008 Associate Professor of Philsophy New York University 2003 Associate Professor of Philosophy 1999–2003 Associate Professor of Philosophy without Tenure Princeton University 1997–1999 Assistant Professor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 1996-1997 Post-Doctoral Scholar, Center for Philosophy of Science AWARDS AND HONOURS 2019 Michigan Humanities Award 2017 Steven Humphrey Lecturer in the Philosophy of Science. UC Santa Barbara 2014 Lakatos Award for Geometric Possibility 2006–2007 Burkhardt Fellowship, American Council of Learned Societies 2002–2003 Fellowship, National Science Foundation 1996–97 Post-doctoral fellowship, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council VISITING POSITIONS Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy 2018 Research Fellow University of Bristol 2017 Benjamin Meaker Visiting Professor, Institute for Advanced Studies Center for Advanced Studies in the Behavioral Sciences 2006–2007 Fellow BOOK 2011 Geometric Possibility. Oxford University Press. Paperback edition 2013. PAPERS Forthcoming “An Automatic Ockham’s Razor for Bayesians?” Erkenntnis. 2018 “Fifty Million Elvis Fans Can’t Be Wrong.” Noûs 52: 946–981. 2017 “Curve-Fitting for Bayesians?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68: 689–702. 2017 “Objectivity and Bias.” Mind 126: 655–695. 2016 “Sober as a Judge.” Metascience 25: 387–92. 2016 “Undermined.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94: 781–91.
    [Show full text]
  • Phronesis and Virtue of Character: the Making of Morally Right Goals in Aristotle’S Nicomachean Ethics by Yuchen Liang
    Phronesis And Virtue of Character: The Making of Morally Right Goals in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics by Yuchen Liang A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts with Honors Department of Philosophy in the University of Michigan 2017 Advisor: Professor Laura Ruetsche Second Reader: Professor Maria Lasonen-Aarnio 1 1. Virtue Makes the Goal Right? The Humean Controversy In this chapter I aim to set the stage for a debate on the nature of the starting-point of phronesis. Phronesis is generally translated as “practical wisdom”. It is the knowledge of how to perform morally right actions. Its starting-point, as I will later explain in detail, is the setting of morally right goals. Why does there have to be a debate in the first place? The short answer would be that some Aristotle scholars disagree with ways to read an important sentence in Nicomachean Ethics (EN). This infamous sentence is: 1. Virtue makes the goal right, phronesis the things towards it. (EN 1144a6-9) I will refer to this sentence as the “making the goal right” sentence throughout this thesis. Many philosophers worry that a literal reading of this sentence would lead to a “Humean” interpretation of Aristotle’s ethics. The term “Humean” here denotes a specific type of ethical system, rather than what Hume says strictly. A “Humean” ethical system emphasizes the role of desire in ethical decisions, in contrast to intellect. Some claim that this Humean system contradicts Aristotle’s general attitude towards moral actions, especially his definition of phronesis.
    [Show full text]