DOCSLIB.ORG

Sample Ple Sample Sam Ample Sample Sam

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sample Ple Sample Sam Ample Sample Sam SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SA SAMPLE SAMPLE SA SAMPLE SAMPLE SA MPL SAMPLE SAMPLE SA MPL DEM SAMPLEREP SAMPLE MPLE SA E in the County ofSAMPLE Cass SAMPLE MPLE Vote for ONE SA FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL MPLE SAMPLE DEM SAMPLE SA TERESA HENSLEY REP JOSH HAWLEY SAMPLELIB MPLE DISTRICT 4 SA Write-in OFFICIAL SAMPLE BALLOT DEM Vote for ONE eneral Election will be held REP SAMPLE MPLE SAM CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI FOR UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE SA LIB LIBERTARIAN - (LIB); CONSTITUTION - (CST); GREEN - (GRN); INDEPENDENT - (IND) NOTICE OF ELECTION GRN GORDON CHRISTENSEN REP MPLE SAMPLE GENERAL ELECTION - NOVEMBER 8, 2016 SAMPLE LIB IND VICKY HARTZLER SA FOR GOVERNORVote for ONE MARK BLISS IND MPLE SAMPLE SAMPLEWrite-in DISTRICT 31 FOR STATEVote SENATOR for ONE SA CHRIS KOSTER DEM MPLE SAMPLE ERIC GREITENS SAMPLEREP SA LIB CISSE W SPRAGINS ED EMERY DEM DON FITZ SAMPLEGRN LORA YOUNG SA MPLREP E SAMPLE LESTER BENTON (LES) TURILLI, JR. TIM WELLS DEMOCRATIC - (DEM); REPUBLICAN - (REP); Vote for ONE DEM Write-in Write-in DISTRICT 33 SAMPLE Vote for ONE MPLE SAMPLE Notice is hereby given that the November G FOR LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR SA FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE REP DEM on Tuesday, November 8, 2016 as certified to this office by the participating entitiesSAMPLERUSS of CARNAHAN Cass County. REP MPLE SAM LIB MIKE PARSON SALIB CHASE LINDER The ballot for the election shall be in substantially the following form: STEVEN R. HEDRICK DONNA PFAUTSCH A vote for candidates forVote President for ONE PAIR and MPLE CST JENNIFER LEACH SAMPLE Vice President is a vote for their Electors. SA Write-in Vote for ONE FOR PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT Write-in PLE FOR SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON GRN MPLDEM E SAMPLE SAMPL TIMOTHY MICHAEL KAINE SA REP DONALD J. TRUMP ROBIN SMITH LIB MICHAEL R. PENCE MPLE SAMPLE SAMPL JOHN (JAY)SA ASHCROFT GRN SA GARY JOHNSON CHRIS MORRILL BILL WELD Vote for ONE Write-in MPLE SA FOR STATE TREASURER SAMPLE SA DARRELL L. CASTLE DEM SCOTT N. BRADLEY REP MPLE JILL STEIN LIB MPLJUDY BAKERE SAMPLE SA AJAMU BARAKA CST ERIC SCHMITT GRNMPLE SEAN O'TOOLE SAM MPLE Vote for ONE SA CAROL HEXEM Write-in FOR UNITED STATES SENATOR MPLE Write-in SAMPLE SA MPLE SAM JASON KANDER PLE ROY BLUNT MPLE SAMPLE MPLE SAMPLE JONATHAN DINE SA FRED RYMAN SAM MPLE SAMPLE JOHNATHAN McFARLAND SA Write-inPLE SAMPLE MPL PLE SA SAMPLE MPLE SA E SAMPLE SA MPLE SAMPLE SA MPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SA MPL SAMPLE MPL SAMPLE SA E MPL SAMPLE SA E MPL SAM SA E MPL SAM SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SA SAMPLE SAMPLE SA SAMPLE SAMPLE SA MPL SAMPLE SAMPLE SA MPL SAMPLE SAMPLE SA MPLE REP E SAMPLE SAMPLE SA MPLE DISTRICT 2 REP MPLE Vote for ONE SAMPLE SAMPLE SA FOR COUNTY COMMISSIONER SAMPLE SA MPLE JIMMY ODOM FOR SHERIFF DEM Vote for ONE REP MPLE SAM Write-in SAMPLE SA DEM SAMPLE MPLE SAMPLE JEFF WEBER SA FOR ASSESSORVote for ONE REP Write-in SAMPLE MPLE SAMPLE DISTRICT 37 SA Vote for ONE FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DEM BILL SMITH MPLE SAMPLE REP BOB HUSTON SAMPLEREP SA Vote for ONE Write-in FOR COUNTY TREASURER JOE RUNIONS SAMPLE MPLE SAMPLE DISTRICT 55 SA Write-in Vote for ONE FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE STEVE CHESLIK VoteSAMPLE for ONE MPLE SAMPLE DEM Write-in SA REP FOR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATOR ASHLEY BEARD-FOSNOW SAMPLE MPLE SAM RICK BRATTIN MELODY A. FOLSOM SA DISTRICT 56 Write-in Vote for ONE Write-in MPLE FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE SA SAMPLE OFFICIAL JUDICIAL BALLOT DEM Submitting to the voters whether the PLE in office for a new term. REP SAMPLE SAMPL Judge named below, whose term expires MPLE DecemberVOTE 31, 2016, ON shall EACH be retainedJUDGE DJ RASH SA JACK BONDON DISTRICT 57 MPLE SAMPLE SAMPL Write-in Vote for ONE SA SA FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE MISSOURI SUPREME COURT JUDGE REP MPLE SAMPLE SAShall Judge RICHARDYES B. TEITELMAN of the SA Missouri Supreme Court be retained in office? WILLIAM A. GRIMES NO MPLE WANDA BROWN MPLE SAMPLE SA FOR CIRCUIT JUDGE Write-in Vote for ONE CIRCUIT 17 DIVISION 2 DEMMPLE SAM SA MPLE REP MPLE MPLE SAM MIKE WAGNER SAMPLE SA DISTRICT 1 Write-in Vote for ONE PLE FOR COUNTY COMMISSIONERMPLE SAMPLE SA MPLE SAMPLE SAM MPLE SAMPLE LUKE SCAVUZZO SA MONTYPLE KISNER Write-in SAMPLE MPL PLE SA SAMPLE MPLE SA E SAMPLE SA MPLE SAMPLE SA MPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SA MPL SAMPLE MPL SAMPLE SA E MPL SAMPLE SA E MPL SAM SA E MPL SAM SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SA SAMPLE SAMPLE SA SS HJR 53 SAMPLE SAMPLE SA MPL (Second Regular Session) CONSTITUTIONALProposed by the AMENDMENT 98th General Assembly NO. 6 SAMPLE SAMPLE SA MPL Shall the Constitution of Missouri be SAMPLE SAMPLE MPLE amended to state that voters may be required SA by law, which may be subject to exception, to E verify one's identity, citizenship, and residence MPLE by presenting identification thatSAMPLE may include SAMPLE valid government-issued photo identification? SA The proposed amendment will result in no costs or savings because any potential costs SAMPLE MPLE wouldSAMPLE be due to the enactment of a general law SA Proposed by Initiative Petition allowed by this proposal. If such a general law CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT NO. 3 is enacted, the potential costs to state and local governments is unknown, but could exceed SAMPLE MPLE $2.1 million annually.YES SA NO Shall theincrease Missouri taxes Constitution on cigarettes be amended each year to: through SAMPLE MPLE SAM 2020, at which point this additional tax will total SA STATUTORYPROPOSITION MEASURE A 60 cents per pack of 20; create a fee paid by cigarette wholesalers of 67 cents per pack of 20 on certain cigarettes, ProposedSAMPLE by Initiative Petition MPLE SAMPLE which fee shall increase annually; and SA deposit funds generated by these taxes and fees into a newly established Early Childhood Health and Education Trust Fund? SAMPLE MPLE SAMPLE increase taxes on cigarettes in 2017, Shall Missouri law be amended to: SA 2019, and 2021, at which point this additional tax will total 23 cents per pack When cigarette tax increases are fully of 20; implemented, estimated additional revenue to state SAMPLE MPLE SAMPLE increase the tax paid by sellers on other SA CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS government is $263 million to $374 million annually, Missouri(SJR Constitution 1, 2005) tobacco products by 5 percent of with limited estimated implementation costs. The manufacturer's invoice price; CONSTITUTIONALProposed by AMENDMENT Article IV, Section NO.47(c) 1 revenue will fund only programs and services SAMPLE use funds generated by these taxes MPLE SAMPLE allowed by the proposal. The fiscal impact to local exclusively to fund transportation SA governmental entitiesYES is unknown. infrastructure projects; and NO repeal these taxes if a measure to SAMPLE increase any tax or fee on cigarettes or MPLE SAMPLE Proposed by Initiative Petition otherSA tobacco products is certified to Shall Missouri continue for 10 years the one- CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT NO. 4 appear on any local or statewide ballot? tenth of one percent sales/use tax that is used for soil and water conservation and for state parks and SAMPLE MPLE SAM historic sites, and resubmit this tax to the voters for SA State government revenue will increase by approval in 10 years? Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to approximately $95 million to $103 million The measure continues and does not increase prohibit a new state or local sales/use or other annuallyMPL when cigarette andE tobacco tax SAMPLE the existing sales and use tax of one-tenth of one similar tax on any service or transaction that was not SA increases are fully implemented, with the new percent for 10 years. The measure would continue subject to a sales/use or similar tax as of January 1, revenue earmarked for transportation to generate approximately $90 million annually for 2015? infrastructure. Local government revenues PLE soil and water conservationYES and operation of the MPLEcould decrease approximately $3 million SAMPLE SAMPL Potential costs to state and local governmental annually due to decreased cigarette and state park system. NO SA YES entities are unknown, but could be significant. The tobacco sales. Proposed by Initiative Petition proposal's passage would impact governmental NO entity's ability to revise their tax structures. State MPLE SAMPLE SAMPL CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT NO. 2 and local governments YES expectSA no savings from this SA proposal. NO MPLE SAMPLE establish limits on campaign contributions by Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to: SA SA individuals or entities to political parties, political committees, or committees to elect candidates for state or judicial office; MPLE SAMPLE MPLE prohibit individuals and entities from SA intentionally concealing the source of such contributions; require corporations or labor organizations to MPLE SAM MPLE meet certain requirements in order to make SA such contributions; and provide a complaint process and penalties for any violations of this amendment? MPLE SAMPLE MPLE SAM SA PLE It is estimated this proposal will increase state MPLE SAMPLE government costs by at least $118,000 annuallyMPL and E SAMPLE have an unknown change in costs for local SA governmental entities. Any potential impact to revenues for state and local governmental entities is SAM MPLE SAMPLE unknown. YES SA NO PLE SAMPLE MPL PLE SA SAMPLE MPLE SA E SAMPLE SA MPLE SAMPLE SA MPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SA MPL SAMPLE MPL SAMPLE SA E MPL SAMPLE SA E MPL SAM SA E MPL SAM SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE SA SAMPLE SAMPLE SA CITY OF LEE'S SUMMIT SAMPLE SAMPLE SA MPL SAMPLE MPL Shall the City of Lee's Summit, Missouri, SAMPLE SA issue its general obligation bonds in the amount of $14,500,000.00 for the purpose of making public safety improvements including SAMPLE SAMPLE MPLE (a) the acquisition and installation of new SA emergency services radio equipment and E related infrastructure (with interconnections for MPLE public safety and other operationsSAMPLE of the City), SAMPLE (b) the acquisition, construction, furnishing and SA equipping of a new fire station to replace Fire QUESTION NO.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In the Missouri Supreme Court ______
    IN THE MISSOURI SUPREME COURT ________________________________________________________________________ CAUSE NO. SC87400 ________________________________________________________________________ CITY OF ST. LOUIS APPELLANT, v. SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P. RESPONDENT. ________________________________________________________________________ APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DIVISION NO. 5 HONORABLE DAVID L. DOWD ________________________________________________________________________ BRIEF OF APPELLANT ________________________________________________________________________ CITY OF ST. LOUIS LAW DEPARTMENT Mark Lawson #33337 Associate City Counselor Room 314, City Hall St. Louis, MO 63103 Phone: (314) 622-3361 Fax: (314) 622-4956 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS . 2 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES . 4 JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT . 18 STATEMENT OF FACTS . 19 POINTS RELIED ON . 22 ARGUMENT . 33 POINT I . 33 POINT II . 39 POINT III . 48 POINT IV . 63 POINT V . 77 POINT VI . 88 POINT VII . 94 POINT VIII . 98 POINT IX . 100 POINT X . 103 POINT XI . 110 POINT XII . 116 POINT XIII . 118 CONCLUSION . 122 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE . 123 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE . 123 APPENDIX . A-0 3 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page Cases 508 Chestnut, Inc. v. City of St. Louis, 389 S.W.2d 823 (Mo. 1965) 111 Airtouch Communications, Inc. v. Dept. of Revenue, 76 P.3d 342 (Wyo. 2003) 38 Airway Drive-In Theatre Co. v. City of St. Ann, 354 S.W.2d 858 (Mo. banc 1962) 115 Armco Steel Corp. v. Dept. of Treasury, 358 N.W.2d 839 (Mich. 1984) 118 Arsenal Credit Union v. Giles, 715 S.W.2d 918 (Mo. banc 1986) 106 Asmus v. Pacific Bell, 999 P.2d 71 (Cal. 2000) 60 B & D Inv. Co., Inc. v. Schneider, 646 S.W.2d 759 (Mo.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet: Designation of Election Infrastructure As Critical Infrastructure
    Fact Sheet: Designation of Election Infrastructure as Critical Infrastructure Consistent with Presidential Policy Directive (PPD) 21, the Secretary of Homeland Security has established Election Infrastructure as a critical infrastructure subsector within the Government Facilities Sector. Election infrastructure includes a diverse set of assets, systems, and networks critical to the administration of the election process. When we use the term “election infrastrucure,” we mean the key parts of the assets, systems, and networks most critical to the security and resilience of the election process, both physical locations and information and communication technology. Specficially, we mean at least the information, capabilities, physical assets, and technologies which enable the registration and validation of voters; the casting, transmission, tabulation, and reporting of votes; and the certification, auditing, and verification of elections. Components of election infrastructure include, but are not limited to: • Physical locations: o Storage facilities, which may be located on public or private property that may be used to store election and voting system infrastructure before Election Day. o Polling places (including early voting locations), which may be physically located on public or private property, and may face physical and cyber threats to their normal operations on Election Day. o Centralized vote tabulation locations, which are used by some states and localities to process absentee and Election Day voting materials. • Information
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Election
    NOTICE OF ELECTION Notice is hereby given that a General Election will be held in the State of Missouri on the 8th day of November, 2016 for the purpose of voting on candidates and statewide ballot measures (Section 115.125, RSMo). DEMOCRATIC PARTY REPUBLICAN PARTY LIBERTARIAN PARTY CONSTITUTION PARTY GREEN PARTY FOR PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT (VOTE FOR 1) HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON TIMOTHY MICHAEL KAINE DEMOCRATIC PARTY DONALD J. TRUMP MICHAEL R. PENCE REPUBLICAN PARTY GARY JOHNSON BILL WELD LIBERTARIAN PARTY DARRELL L. CASTLE SCOTT N. BRADLEY CONSTITUTION PARTY JILL STEIN AJAMU BARAKA GREEN PARTY FOR UNITED STATES SENATOR (VOTE FOR 1) JASON KANDER DEMOCRATIC PARTY ROY BLUNT REPUBLICAN PARTY JONATHAN DINE LIBERTARIAN PARTY FRED RYMAN CONSTITUTION PARTY JOHNATHAN MCFARLAND GREEN PARTY FOR GOVERNOR (VOTE FOR 1) CHRIS KOSTER DEMOCRATIC PARTY ERIC GREITENS REPUBLICAN PARTY CISSE W SPRAGINS LIBERTARIAN PARTY DON FITZ GREEN PARTY LESTER BENTON (LES) TURILLI, JR. INDEPENDENT FOR LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR (VOTE FOR 1) RUSS CARNAHAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY MIKE PARSON REPUBLICAN PARTY STEVEN R. HEDRICK LIBERTARIAN PARTY JENNIFER LEACH GREEN PARTY FOR SECRETARY OF STATE (VOTE FOR 1) ROBIN SMITH DEMOCRATIC PARTY JOHN (JAY) ASHCROFT REPUBLICAN PARTY CHRIS MORRILL LIBERTARIAN PARTY FOR STATE TREASURER (VOTE FOR 1) JUDY BAKER DEMOCRATIC PARTY ERIC SCHMITT REPUBLICAN PARTY SEAN O’TOOLE LIBERTARIAN PARTY CAROL HEXEM GREEN PARTY FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL (VOTE FOR 1) TERESA HENSLEY DEMOCRATIC PARTY JOSH HAWLEY REPUBLICAN PARTY FOR UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 4
    [Show full text]
  • Court Consolidation in Missouri, Where Are We After 20 Years?
    Court Consolidation in Missouri, Where Are We After 20 Years? Institute Of Court Management Court Executive Development Program Phase III Project May, 2001 Jerry A. Moyer, Clerk of the Circuit Court Barton County Circuit Court Lamar, Missouri 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: 1. The Honorable C. David Darnold, Senior Judge, State of Missouri; Presiding Circuit Judge, 28th Judicial Circuit, 1979-2000, 2. The Honorable Henry L. Lisle, Associate Circuit Judge, Barton County, Lamar, Missouri, 1967-1982, retired; Member of the Cosgrove Committee, 1974-1976, 3. Mr. David Heumader, Trial Court Administrator, 28th Judicial Circuit, Vernon County, Nevada, Missouri, 1998-present, 4. The Honorable Frank Conley, Presiding Circuit Judge, 13th Judicial Circuit, Boone County, Columbia, Missouri, 1970-present, 5. The Honorable Charles D. Curless, Associate Circuit Judge, Barton County, Lamar, Missouri, 1995-present, 6. Dr. Daniel H. Straub, Ph.D., Senior Faculty Member, Institute for Court Management, National Center For State Courts. 7. Mrs. Nancy Griggs, Director of Court Services Division, Office of State Courts Administrator, State of Missouri. 8. Ms. Linda Hope, Evaluation Specialist, Office of State Courts Administrator, State of Missouri. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Note: Page numbers are changed in electronic format) Acknowledgments....................................................................................................i Table of Contents....................................................................................................ii List of Illustrations
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Constitution Article III Initiative and Referendum Section
    Missouri Constitution Article III Initiative and Referendum Section 49. Reservation of power to enact and reject laws. The people reserve power to propose and enact or reject laws and amendments to the constitution by the initiative, independent of the general assembly, and also reserve power to approve or reject by referendum any act of the general assembly, except as hereinafter provided. Section 50. Initiative petitions--signatures required--form and procedure. Initiative petitions proposing amendments to the constitution shall be signed by eight percent of the legal voters in each of two-thirds of the congressional districts in the state, and petitions proposing laws shall be signed by five percent of such voters. Every such petition shall be filed with the secretary of state not less than six months before the election and shall contain an enacting clause and the full text of the measure. Petitions for constitutional amendments shall not contain more than one amended and revised article of this constitution, or one new article which shall not contain more than one subject and matters properly connected therewith, and the enacting clause thereof shall be "Be it resolved by the people of the state of Missouri that the Constitution be amended:". Petitions for laws shall contain not more than one subject which shall be expressed clearly in the title, and the enacting clause thereof shall be "Be it enacted by the people of the state of Missouri:". Section 51. Appropriations by initiative--effective date of initiated laws -- conflicting laws concurrently adopted. The initiative shall not be used for the appropriation of money other than of new revenues created and provided for thereby, or for any other purpose prohibited by this constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Bicentennial Inauguration of Michael L. Parson 57Th Governor of the State of Missouri
    Missouri Governor — Michael L. Parson Office of Communications 2021 Bicentennial Inauguration of Michael L. Parson 57th Governor of the State of Missouri On Monday, January 11, 2021, Governor Michael L. Parson will be sworn in as the 57th Governor of the State of Missouri at the 2021 Bicentennial Inauguration. Governor Michael L. Parson Governor Parson is a veteran who served six years in the United States Army. He served more than 22 years in law enforcement, including 12 years as the sheriff of Polk County. He also served in the Missouri House of Representatives from 2005-2011, in the Missouri Senate from 2011-2017, and as Lieutenant Governor from 2017-2018. Governor Parson and First Lady Teresa live in Bolivar. Together they have two children and six grandchildren. Governor Parson was raised on a farm in Hickory County and graduated from Wheatland High School in Wheatland, Missouri. He is a small business owner and a third generation farmer who currently owns and operates a cow and calf operation. Governor Parson has a passion for sports, agriculture, Christ, and people. Health and Safety Protocols State and local health officials have been consulted for guidance to protect attendees, participants, and staff on safely hosting this year’s inaugural celebration. All inauguration guests will go through a health and security screening prior to entry. Inaugural events will be socially distanced, masks will be available and encouraged, and hand sanitizer will be provided. Guests were highly encouraged to RSVP in advance of the event in order to ensure that seating can be modified to support social distancing standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Congressional Record Corrections for 2019
    Daily Congressional Record Corrections for 2019 VerDate Sep 11 2014 00:56 May 29, 2019 Jkt 089060 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 8392 Sfmt 8392 J:\CRONLINE\2019-BATCH-JAN\2019 TITLE PAGES FOR CRI INDEX\2019JANFEB.IDX 2 abonner on DSKBCJ7HB2PROD with CONG-REC-ONLINE VerDate Sep 11 2014 00:56 May 29, 2019 Jkt 089060 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 8392 Sfmt 8392 J:\CRONLINE\2019-BATCH-JAN\2019 TITLE PAGES FOR CRI INDEX\2019JANFEB.IDX 2 abonner on DSKBCJ7HB2PROD with CONG-REC-ONLINE Daily Congressional Record Corrections Note: Corrections to the Daily Congressional Record are identified online. (Corrections January 2, 2019 through February 28, 2019) Senate On page S8053, January 2, 2019, first column, The online Record has been corrected to read: the following appears: The PRESIDING OFFI- The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it CER. Without objection, it is so ordered. The is so ordered. The question is, Will the Senate ad- nominations considered and confirmed are as fol- vise and consent to the nominations of Robert S. lows: Robert S. Brewer, Jr., of California, to be Brewer, Jr., of California, to be United States At- United States Attorney for the Southern District of torney for the Southern District of California for California for the term of four years. Nicholas A. the term of four years; Nicholas A. Trutanich, of Trutanich, of Nevada, to be United States Attor- Nevada, to be United States Attorney for the Dis- ney for the District of Nevada for the term of four trict of Nevada for the term of four years; Brian years.
    [Show full text]
  • Bethany Republican-Clipper the Official Newspaper of Harrison County, Missouri Since 1873 Bethany, Missouri 64424 Vol
    Bethany Republican-Clipper The official newspaper of Harrison County, Missouri since 1873 Bethany, Missouri 64424 Vol. 89, No. 18 www.bethanyclipper.com June 6, 2018 75 Cents Towns attempting to meet EPA standards on wastewater output Two Harrison County towns allow the city to retrofit its has been working with several munity also has a three-stage are working on wastewater present lagoon system to com- area communities in developing lagoon facility that needs to be treatment projects to meet new ply with DNR standards. This new treatment systems. brought into compliance with EPA limits on ammonia and ni- would benefit farmers by pro- “We have to figure out what EPA regulations. trogen levels in treated sewage. viding nutrients for their pasture is needed and the corrective Gilman City began advertis- The Ridgeway City Council and row crops and even to have actions that should be taken,” ing for bids this week on their met recently with a representa- access to the water discharged Rains said. treatment facility. The bids will tive of Allstate Consultants En- from the third lagoon. “Some 73 villages and cit- be opened at 1 p.m. on July 9 at gineering of Marceline, Mo., to Sayre offered to come back ies now have issues because the City Clerk’s office. discuss proposed modifications at an evening meeting to hold EPA told DNR that they need to Gilman City’s project will be in the community’s sewage la- discussions with farmers and tighten up their regulations on funded by $500,000 in commu- goon system.
    [Show full text]
  • Secretaries of State Are Crucial for Protecting African American Voters
    GETTY IMAGES/IRA L. BLACK GETTY L. IMAGES/IRA Secretaries of State Are Crucial for Protecting African American Voters By Michael Sozan and Christopher Guerrero August 2020 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESSACTION.ORG Contents 1 Introduction and summary 2 Background for the analysis 6 Analyzing the state of elections 11 Recommendations for secretaries of state during the COVID-19 pandemic 14 Conclusion 14 About the authors 14 Acknowledgments 15 Endnotes Introduction and summary The United States is simultaneously confronting three wrenching challenges: the deadly COVID-19 pandemic, deep economic upheaval, and systemic racism—issues that disproportionately affect African Americans. Compounding these critical issues is the racial discrimination that pervades the U.S. voting system and silences the voices of the communities that are most affected. In several primary elections across the country, there has been a breakdown in election processes—including closed polling places, mail ballot voting hurdles, and malfunctioning voting equipment—causing outsize harm to African American communities. It is important for elected officials to ensure that every American can fully exercise their constitutional right to vote, especially during a pivotal election year. Secretaries of state, although perhaps not the most well-known public officials, serve as the gatekeepers of free and fair elections across the United States. As the top election administrators in most states, they face unprecedented hurdles to running safe elections during a pandemic, on top of their responsibility to ensure that elec- tions are inclusive and accessible. The decisions that secretaries of state make can help determine whether every eligible American can vote and play a meaningful role in transforming the United States into a more just society.
    [Show full text]
  • You Are Advised That the Proposed Constitutional Amendment May Change, Repeal, Or Modify by Implication Or May Be Const
    NOTICE: You are advised that the proposed constitutional amendment may change, repeal, or modify by implication or may be construed by some persons to change, repeal or modify by implication, the following Articles and Sections of the Constitution of Missouri: Article I, Section 8 and the following Sections of the Missouri Revised Statutes: Sections 105.450 through 105.496 and Sections 130.011 through 130.160. The proposed amendment revises Article III of the Constitution by amending Sections 2, 5, 7, and 19 and adopting three new sections to be known as Article III Sections 3, 20(c), and 20(d). Be it resolved by the people of the state of Missouri that the Constitution be amended: Section A. Article III of the Constitution is revised by amending Sections 2, 5, 7, 19, and adopting three new sections to be known as Article III Sections 3, 20(c), and 20(d) to read as follows: Section 2. After the effective date of this section, no person serving as a member of or employed by the General Assembly shall act or serve as a paid lobbyist, register as a paid lobbyist, or solicit prospective employers or clients to represent as a paid lobbyist during the time of such service until the expiration of two calendar years after the conclusion of the session of the general assembly in which the member or employee last served and where such service was after the effective date of this section. (a) No person serving as a member of or employed by the General Assembly shall accept directly or indirectly a gift of any tangible or intangible item, service, or thing of value from any paid lobbyist or lobbyist principal in excess of five dollars per occurrence.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2020 Candidates
    Certification of Candidates and Party Emblems Certified by John R. Ashcroft Secretary of State IMPORTANT These are candidates for the General Election on Tuesday, November 3, 2020 JOHN R. ASHCROFT SECRETARY OF STATE JAMES C. KIRKPATRICK STATE OF MISSOURI ELECTIONS DIVISION STATE INFORMATION CENTER (573) 751-2301 (573) 751-4936 August 25, 2020 Dear Election Authority: I, John R. Ashcroft, Secretary of State of the State of Missouri, in compliance with Section 115.401, RSMo, hereby certify that the persons named hereinafter and whose addresses are set opposite their respective names were duly and lawfully nominated as candidates of the above-named parties and independent candidates for the offices herein named to be filled at the General Election to be held November 3, 2020. This 2020 General Election Certification booklet contains: 1. The list of names and addresses of candidates entitled to be voted for at the November 3, 2020 general election; 2. The list of names and addresses of the nonpartisan judicial candidates to be voted for at the November 2020 general election; and 3. The party emblems. These emblems are required by law to be certified by the Secretary of State but are not required to be included on the ballot. Please be advised that candidate filing remains open for certain offices. These offices are denoted with an * in the certification book. Our office will issue supplemental certifications as necessary, should candidates file for those offices. If you are impact- ed by an open filing period, you should consider withholding printing ballots until further notified. If you have any questions, please call us at (800) 669-8683 or (573) 751-2301.
    [Show full text]
  • The Source of Authority for Rules of Court Affecting Procedure
    Washington University Law Review Volume 22 Issue 4 January 1937 The Source of Authority for Rules of Court Affecting Procedure Tyrrell Williams Washington University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the Courts Commons Recommended Citation Tyrrell Williams, The Source of Authority for Rules of Court Affecting Procedure, 22 WASH. U. L. Q. 459 (1937). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol22/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAW QUARTERLY Volume XXII JUNE, 1937 Number 4 THE SOURCE OF AUTHORITY FOR RULES OF COURT AFFECTING PROCEDURE TYRRELL WILLIAMSt This article is divided into sections as here indicated. Section 1: The Scope of This Article. Section 2: What Is Procedure? Section 3: What Are Rules of Court? Section 4: The Different Functions of the Judiciary under a Typical American State Con- stitution. Section 5: The Doctrine of Inherent Judicial Power over Matters Ancillary to the Administration of Justice, but Concurrent with Non-Frustrating Legislative Power. Section 6: Certain Doctrines at Variance with the Doctrine Presented in Section 5. Section 7: The Doctrine of Legislative Supremacy in the Field of Procedure. Section 8: Constitutional Limitations on the Doctrine of Legislative Supremacy. Section 9: The Doctrine of Inherent and Exclusive Judicial Rule-Making Power in the Field of Procedure.
    [Show full text]