DOCSLIB.ORG

Restormel Borough Council Election Results 1973-2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Restormel Borough Council Election Results 1973-2007 Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher The Elections Centre Plymouth University The information contained in this report has been obtained from a number of sources. Election results from the immediate post-reorganisation period were painstakingly collected by Alan Willis largely, although not exclusively, from local newspaper reports. From the mid- 1980s onwards the results have been obtained from each local authority by the Elections Centre. The data are stored in a database designed by Lawrence Ware and maintained by Brian Cheal and others at Plymouth University. Despite our best efforts some information remains elusive whilst we accept that some errors are likely to remain. Notice of any mistakes should be sent to [email protected]. The results sequence can be kept up to date by purchasing copies of the annual Local Elections Handbook, details of which can be obtained by contacting the email address above. Front cover: the graph shows the distribution of percentage vote shares over the period covered by the results. The lines reflect the colours traditionally used by the three main parties. The grey line is the share obtained by Independent candidates while the purple line groups together the vote shares for all other parties. Rear cover: the top graph shows the percentage share of council seats for the main parties as well as those won by Independents and other parties. The lines take account of any by- election changes (but not those resulting from elected councillors switching party allegiance) as well as the transfers of seats during the main round of local election. The lower graph shows for each main round of local elections the overall percentage turnout (solid line), the percentage of women candidates standing at (dotted line) and the percentage of women among those elected (hashed line). No. 5 (St. Blazey & Tywardreath) (5463) @ 4 vote share No. 13 (Newquay Central & East) (4903)3 Restormel 1973 Goddard J. Ind 1,217 64.0 vote share Grainger N. Ind 989 - Brown H. Ind 1,370 100.0 2 Williams H. Ind 939 - Morris R.* Ind 1,099 - Fowey (2066) Netherton G. Ind 931 - Young S.* Ind 1,085 - vote share Joyce D. Ms. Ind 864 - Millward A. Ind 800 - Court H. Ms. Ind 579 100.0 Vincent W. Lab 684 36.0 Spreadbury I. Ind 578 - Lethbridge T. Lab 653 - Turnout 39.8 78.2 Garner H. Ind 217 - Singleton D. Lab 592 - Duvoilet R. Ind 139 - 2 No. 14 (Newquay West & Crantock) (2414) Turnout 34.8 28.0 vote share Turnout 28.0 8.6 Wride M. Ms.* Ind 0 0.0 No. 6 (St. Stephen-In-Brannel) (4841)3 Mountford L.* Ind 0 - No. 1 (St. Austell North) (2748)3 vote share vote share Clyma E. Ms. Ind 1,247 100.0 Turnout 0.0 0.0 Clyne D. Ind 983 64.9 Burnett F. Ms. Ind 712 - Julyan W. Ind 898 - Harris D. Ind 638 - No. 2 (St. Austell East Central) (5995)3 Hickling J. Ind 640 - Job A. Ms. Ind 599 - vote share Abraham J. Lab 532 35.1 Smyth T. Ind 316 - Neill M.* Ind 986 38.9 Wakeford J.* Ind 976 - Turnout 55.1 29.8 Turnout 25.8 45.1 Hartwell R. Lib 796 31.4 Penrose G. Ms. Res 754 29.7 No. 10 (Lostwithiel) (1719) No. 7 (Gorran St. Ewe & St.Mewan) (3716)3 Phelps H. Res 690 - vote share vote share Tippett E.* Ind 303 - Furse E. Ind 562 53.9 Lobb W. Ind 967 100.0 Stephens R. Ind 296 28.4 Stewart W. Ind 954 - Turnout 33.3 7.5 Mayell F. Ind 185 17.7 Parnall J. Ind 941 - Adams E. Ind 670 - No. 3 (St. Austell West Central) (4796)3 Turnout 60.7 25.5 Marriott L. Ind 396 - vote share 2 Curtice M. Ms.* Lib 1,321 52.4 No. 12 (Newquay North) (3175) Turnout 26.0 29.3 Old W.* Ind 1,198 47.6 vote share Horn A. Lib 1,064 - Hosking W. Lib 917 56.4 No. 8 (St. Dennis Roche & Luxulyan) (3715)3 Gallagher J. Ms.* Ind 801 - Parkin F. Ind 529 32.6 vote share Hoskin M. Ind 517 - Burnett P. Ind 822 58.3 Turnout 40.5 4.9 Hoskin H. Ms. Ind 356 - Burdon C. Ind 770 - Brind H. Lab 179 11.0 Pollard W. Ind 660 - No. 4 (St. Austell West & Mevagissey) (5119)3 Pascoe W. Lab 587 41.7 vote share Turnout 51.2 23.9 Harber G. Ind 366 - Rowe W. Ind 1,085 66.8 3 Higman C. Ind 272 - Roberts M. Ind 828 - No. 13 (Newquay Central & East) (4734) Bowman O. Ms. Ind 138 - Michael D.* Ind 710 - vote share Dunn P. Ms. Ind 655 - Henwood T. Ind 867 100.0 Turnout 37.9 16.7 Mabey L. Ms. Lib 539 33.2 Young S. Ind 740 - Morris R. Ind 612 - No. 9 (St. Columb Major) (4325)3 Turnout 33.3 33.6 Miles P. Ind 599 - vote share Taylor W. Ind 443 - Lobb L. Ind 1,874 100.0 No. 5 (St. Blazey & Tywardreath) (5638) @ 4 Millwood A. Ind 436 - James G. Ind 707 - vote share Porritt J. Ind 78 - Parsons L. Ind 602 - Rundle S. Ind 0 0.0 Bray H. Ind 472 - Netherton G. Ind 0 - Turnout 18.3 39.0 Richards W. Ind 449 - Goddard J.* Ind 0 - 2 Harvey S. Ind 326 - Grainger N.* Ind 0 - No. 14 (Newquay West & Crantock) (2381) Harris A. Ind 313 - vote share Turnout 0.0 0.0 Wride M. Ms. Ind 649 100.0 Turnout 43.3 68.7 Mountford L. Ind 579 - No. 6 (St. Stephen-In-Brannel) (4744)3 Davis C. Ind 284 - vote share Harris D.* Ind 990 100.0 Turnout 27.3 18.5 Restormel 1976 Clyma E. Ms.* Ind 784 - 3 Job A. Ms. Ind 727 - No. 2 (St. Austell East Central) (5360) Smyth G. Ind 609 - vote share Fowey (2040)2 Wakeford J. Ind 956 73.3 vote share Turnout 34.6 45.6 Neill M. Ind 750 - Spreadbury I.* Ind 577 100.0 Tippett E. Ind 671 - Court H. Ms.* Ind 519 - No. 7 (Gorran St. Ewe & St.Mewan) (3927)3 King H. Ind 376 - Slarke K. Ind 325 - vote share Sanderson H. Lab 348 26.7 Hardy M. Ind 247 - Tetley J. Ind 0 0.0 Penaluna C. Ind 289 - Parnall J.* Ind 0 - Turnout 49.3 -1.7 Lobb W.* Ind 0 - Turnout 24.3 46.6 3 No. 1 (St. Austell North) (2702) 3 Turnout 0.0 0.0 No. 3 (St. Austell West Central) (4750) vote share vote share Julyan W.* Ind 588 100.0 No. 8 (St. Dennis Roche & Luxulyan) (3950)3 Curtice M. Ms. Lib 1,309 45.5 Clyne D.* Ind 529 - vote share Old W. Ind 1,132 39.3 Hickling J.* Ind 398 - Burnett P.* Ind 0 - Gallagher J. Ms. Ind 1,102 - Masters R. Ind 232 - Keam R. Ind 0 0.0 McAlister T. Lab 436 15.2 Burdon C.* Ind 0 - Brown J. Ind 386 - Turnout 27.8 0.2 Turnout 0.0 0.0 Turnout 60.6 6.2 No. 10 (Lostwithiel) (1773) vote share 3 3 No. 9 (St. Columb Major) (4508) No. 4 (St. Austell West & Mevagissey) (4967) Furse E.* Ind 461 60.7 vote share vote share Attwater C. Ms. Lib 298 39.3 Lobb L.* Ind 1,844 67.1 Sarah A. Ind 793 100.0 Parkyn A. Lib 903 32.9 Michael D. Ind 513 - Turnout 42.8 21.5 James G. Ind 835 - Follett C. Ind 496 - 2 Hawkins M. Ind 815 - Whetter J. Ms. Ind 315 - No. 12 (Newquay North) (3186) Parsons L.* Ind 809 - vote share Turnout 16.0 -42.7 Hosking W.* Lib 0 - Turnout 55.7 34.3 Cocks P. Lib 0 0.0 Turnout 0.0 0.0 Results of the English Shire District Council Elections 1973-2007 1 No. 7 (Gorran St. Ewe & St.Mewan) (4037)3 Rialton (4212)3 Restormel 1979 vote share vote share Parnall J.* Ind 0 - Parkin F. Ind 0 - 2 Lobb W.* Ind 0 - Hosking W. Lib/SDP 0 0.0 Fowey (2108) Tetley J.* Ind 0 0.0 Walkey R. Ind 0 0.0 vote share Spreadbury I.* Ind 0 0.0 Turnout 0.0 0.0 Turnout 0.0 0.0 Court H. Ms.* Ind 0 - No. 8 (St. Dennis Roche & Luxulyan) (3891)3 Rock (3044)2 Turnout 0.0 0.0 vote share vote share 3 Burdon C.* Ind 0 - Burnett P. Ind 1,062 87.0 No. 1 (St. Austell North) (2596) Keam R.* Ind 0 0.0 Burdon C. Ind 645 - vote share Burnett P.* Ind 0 - Saundry J. CNP 159 13.0 Hickling J.* Ind 0 - Budge L. Lab 0 0.0 Turnout 0.0 0.0 Turnout 40.1 74.0 Julyan W.* Ind 0 0.0 No. 9 (St. Columb Major) (4820)3 St. Blaise (3982)3 Turnout 0.0 0.0 vote share vote share Parkyn A.* Ind 0 0.0 Alexander T. Ind 942 67.9 No. 10 (Lostwithiel) (1887) James G.* Ind 0 - Grainger N. Ind 690 - vote share Critchley T. Ind 0 - Smith J. Ind 493 - Furse E.* Ind 0 0.0 Atherton W. Lab 445 32.1 Turnout 0.0 0.0 Turnout 0.0 0.0 Turnout 34.8 35.8 2 No. 12 (Newquay North) (3330) St. Columb (3196)2 vote share Restormel 1983 vote share Parkin F. Ind 0 0.0 Parkyn A. Ind 0 - Hoskins W.* Lib 0 0.0 2 Rabey A.
Recommended publications
  • Case Study for Cornwall by REOC Renewable Energy for Commercial

    Case Study for Cornwall by REOC Renewable Energy for Commercial

    Case study for Cornwall by REOC Renewable energy for commercial and industrial buildings in Cornwall. REOC report WP5 “Contribution to the planning process” for SEIPLED TECHNO-ECONOMICAL PLANNING DOSSIER (TEP) November 2007 Contents 1 PROJECT AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................... 4 2 LOCAL CONDITIONS............................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 CORNWALL ECONOMIC STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT............................................................................ 4 2.2 CONVERGENCE PROGRAMME DEVELOPMENT ...................................................................................... 6 2.3 CORNWALL INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL SECTORS........................................................................ 7 2.4 CORNWALL INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS..................................................................... 8 3 CORNWALL INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL ENERGY USE ............................................. 14 3.1 HEAT DEMAND .................................................................................................................................... 16 4 BARRIERS TO RE IN INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE IN CORNWALL..................................... 18 5 OVERCOMING OBSTACLES TO RE IN CORNISH INDUSTRY.................................................. 19 5.1 DEVELOPMENT PHASE........................................................................................................................
  • Appendix a National Transport Tokens A

    Appendix a National Transport Tokens A

    Appendix A National Transport Tokens A sample of councils offering tokens: Selby District Council (£8) Telford & Wrekin (£16) West Lindsey District Council (£18) City of York Council (£20) Stroud District Council (£20) Wellingborough Borough Council (£22) Wear Valley District Council (£25) West Oxfordshire District Council (£31) Councils offering tokens, on payment of a fee: North Wiltshire District Council (Pay £1 fee, receive £18 worth of tokens) Kettering Borough Council (Pay £11 fee, receive £30 worth of tokens) Wycombe District Council (Pay £15 fee, receive £30 worth of tokens) Cherwell District Council (Pay £1 fee, receive £31 worth of tokens) Braintree District Council (Pay £15 fee, receive £40 worth of tokens) East Northamptonshire District Council (Pay £10 fee, receive £47 worth of tokens) Colchester Borough Council (Pay £12 fee, receive £48 worth of tokens) Aylesbury Vale District Council (Pay £5 fee, receive £60 worth of tokens) Blyth Valley Borough Council (Pay £20 fee, receive £70 worth of tokens) Councils offering tokens to the over 60s only: West Lancashire District Council (£28) Councils offering tokens to disabled people only: Shrewsbury & Atcham Borough Council (£25) Bridgnorth District Council (£30) Christchurch Borough Council (£30) Daventry District Council (£30) East Dorset District Council (£30) Fareham Borough Council (Pay £5, receive £35 worth of tokens) Councils offering tokens of differing amounts according to age: East Hampshire District Council (£24 for 60-69 yrs, £30 for 70+ yrs, £50 for wheelchair users/blind,
  • N No of Establishments Ot Yet Rated Fo Intervent

    N No of Establishments Ot Yet Rated Fo Intervent

    Authority Total No of No of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total Total No of Total No Total No Total No of Total No of Total No of Total No of Total No of Total No of Establishments Establishments Broadly Broadly Broadly Broadly Broadly Broadly Interventions Interventions Interventions Interventions Interventions Interventions number of formal of formal of formal formal formal formal formal formal formal (inc unrated) not yet rated for compliant compliant compliant compliant compliant compliant achieved achieved - achieved - achieved - achieved - achieved - samples enforcement enforcem enforceme enforcement enforcement enforcemen enforceme enforcement enforcement intervention premises premises - A premises - B premises - C premises - D premises - E Premises Rated A Premises Rated B Premises Rated C Premises Rated D Premises Rated E taken actions taken ent nt actions actions taken actions taken t actions nt actions actions taken - actions taken - - actions taken - - Seizure, - taken - taken - Improvement Remedial Prosecutions taken - Voluntary dentention Suspension/r Emergency Prohibtion Notices Action & Simple closures and evocation of Prohibition Orders Detention Cautions surrender of approval Notices Notices food DISTRICT COUNCILS Adur 446 39 82.3% 0.0% 29.4% 81.9% 100.0% 100.0% 99.7% 100.0% 100.0% 99.4% 100.0% 100.0% 101 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 Allerdale 1332 77 92.0% 0.0% 46.7% 88.2% 97.1% 99.8% 90.4% 100.0% 97.6% 96.2% 93.9% 70.4% 59 0
  • Areas Designated As 'Rural' for Right to Buy Purposes

    Areas Designated As 'Rural' for Right to Buy Purposes

    Areas designated as 'Rural' for right to buy purposes Region District Designated areas Date designated East Rutland the parishes of Ashwell, Ayston, Barleythorpe, Barrow, 17 March Midlands Barrowden, Beaumont Chase, Belton, Bisbrooke, Braunston, 2004 Brooke, Burley, Caldecott, Clipsham, Cottesmore, Edith SI 2004/418 Weston, Egleton, Empingham, Essendine, Exton, Glaston, Great Casterton, Greetham, Gunthorpe, Hambelton, Horn, Ketton, Langham, Leighfield, Little Casterton, Lyddington, Lyndon, Manton, Market Overton, Martinsthorpe, Morcott, Normanton, North Luffenham, Pickworth, Pilton, Preston, Ridlington, Ryhall, Seaton, South Luffenham, Stoke Dry, Stretton, Teigh, Thistleton, Thorpe by Water, Tickencote, Tinwell, Tixover, Wardley, Whissendine, Whitwell, Wing. East of North Norfolk the whole district, with the exception of the parishes of 15 February England Cromer, Fakenham, Holt, North Walsham and Sheringham 1982 SI 1982/21 East of Kings Lynn and the parishes of Anmer, Bagthorpe with Barmer, Barton 17 March England West Norfolk Bendish, Barwick, Bawsey, Bircham, Boughton, Brancaster, 2004 Burnham Market, Burnham Norton, Burnham Overy, SI 2004/418 Burnham Thorpe, Castle Acre, Castle Rising, Choseley, Clenchwarton, Congham, Crimplesham, Denver, Docking, Downham West, East Rudham, East Walton, East Winch, Emneth, Feltwell, Fincham, Flitcham cum Appleton, Fordham, Fring, Gayton, Great Massingham, Grimston, Harpley, Hilgay, Hillington, Hockwold-Cum-Wilton, Holme- Next-The-Sea, Houghton, Ingoldisthorpe, Leziate, Little Massingham, Marham, Marshland
  • Local Authority District Codes

    Local Authority District Codes

    UK Data Archive Study Number 6028 - British Household Panel Survey, Waves 1-18, 1991-2009: Conditional Access, Local Authority District Codes British Household Panel Survey, waves 1-18 (1991-2009) User Documentation: Local Authority District Codes (LADISTC) 05 November 2008 For more information contact: Birgitta Rabe [email protected] ++44-1206-874594 Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex Wivenhoe Park Colchester Essex CO4 3SQ Local Authority District Codes (wLADISTC) The local authority districts within the database are aggregated if their population falls below 120,000. This aggregation is on the same basis as that for the Census Sample of Anonymised (Individual) Records, and the codes used are the same as those given in Marsh, C. and Teague, A. 'Samples of anonymised records from the 1991 Census', Population Trends, 69, 17-26, 1992. Note that, for wLADISTC, only codes up to 278 are relevant. 1: City; Westminster 53: Newcastle upon Tyne 2: Camden 54: North Tyneside 3: Hackney 55: South Tyneside 4: Hammersmith & Fulham 56: Sunderland 5: Haringey 57: Birmingham 6: Islington 58: Coventry 7: Kensington & Chelsea 59: Dudley 8: Lambeth 60: Sandwell 9: Lewisham 61: Solihull 10: Newham 62: Walsall 11: Southwark 63: Wolverhampton 12: Tower Hamlets 64: Bradford 13: Wandsworth 65: Calderdale 14: Barking and Dagenham 66: Kirklees 15: Barnet 67: Leeds 16: Bexley 68: Wakefield 17: Brent 69: Bath; Kingswood; Wansdyke 18: Bromley 70: Bristol 19: Croydon 71: Northavon 20: Ealing 72: Woodspring 21: Enfield 73: Luton 22: Greenwich
  • Year Dog Friendly Beaches

    Year Dog Friendly Beaches

    COUNCIL OFFICES If you have any queries or comments to make on the dog bans listed or any related matters please telephone the appropriate Council: CARADON DISTRICTCOUNCIL 01579 341000 CARRICK DISTRICT COUNCIL 01872 224400 KERRIER DISTRICT COUNCIL 01209 614000 Photo: Gyllyngvase Beach, Paul Watts NORTH CORNWALL DISTRICT COUNCIL 01208 893333 PENWITH DISTRICT COUNCIL 01736 362341 RESTORMEL BOROUGH COUNCIL 01726 223300 DOG OWNERS CORNWALL 6 BEACH GUIDE FOR 5 i BUDE Widemouth Bay 4 Boscastle i 2 3 BEACHES ON WHICH DOG BANS APPLY Tintagel i Dog bans apply on the following beaches from Easter Day to 1st October unless stated* 1 North i LAUNCESTON Port Isaac Cornwall Caradon Penwith i 1 Cawsand Beach 1 Perranuthnoe PADSTOW Polzeath CAMELFORD 2 Portwrinkle Beach 2 Marazion (Chapel Rock to Long Rock i 3 Millendreath Beach *all year ban Level Crossing) - 2 Rock 4 East Looe Beach *all year ban 3 Penzance Promenade (to Lariggan River) 4 Mousehole *all year ban in harbour Pentire i Carrick 5 Porthcurno - 2 Watergate WADEBRIDGE 1 Tattams Beach 6 Sennen Cove (including harbour) - 2 Bay Bedruthan 2 Porth Beach 7 Porthmeor - 2 Steps BODMIN i Photo: Gyllyngvase Beach, Paul Watts i LISKEARD 3 Summers Beach 8 Porthgwidden 10 9 11 4 Tavern Beach 9 St. Ives Harbour 5 Castle Beach 10 Porthminster - 2 i Caradon 6 Gyllyngvase Beach - 2 11 Carbis Bay - 2 NEWQUAY LOSTWITHIEL i SALTASH 7 Swanpool Beach 12 Hayle Towans (from Hayle River to Restormel 8 Maenporth Beach Black Cliffs) - 2 10 Holywell i i 9 Porthtowan Beach - 2 13 Gwithian (Ceres Rock to Red River) - 2 Perranporth ST.
  • The London Gazette, 23Rd April 1985

    The London Gazette, 23Rd April 1985

    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 23RD APRIL 1985 5653 Eurosoft Limited DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT Excelware Limited F & T Wares Limited TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 Fayley Box Co (1978) Limited The Secretary of State for Transport hereby gives notice Focus Freight Services Limited that he proposes to make an Order under section 209 of the above Act to authorise the stopping up of a length G & J Westiake Limited of Trethellan Hill, Newquay, Cornwall, to enable resi- Gardbest Limited dential development to be earned out in accordance with General Ghipi Company London Limited, The planning permission granted to Messrs Daniel Smith, General Chip Company Midlands Limited-, The Rnanit and Done General Chip Storage and Distribution Limited, The During 28 days from 23rd April 1985, copies of the Gladehold Limited draft Order and relevant plan may be inspected at all Glasscoat Limited reasonable hours at the Borough of Restormel Council Gloucester Energy Conservation Systems Limited 1 Offices, 39 Penwinnick Road, St Austell, Cornwall PL25 Goncland Limited 5RR, and may be obtained, free of charge, from the GSW Temco Limited Department of Transport (quoting ref DSW 504835/1/028) G T C Builders Limited at the address slated below Within the above-mentioned period of 28 days, any Harleys (Preston) Limited person may by notice to the Secretary of State, Depart- Harvardson Limited! ment of Transport (ref DSW 504835/1/028) at his adress Hazel Hurst Homes Limited of the Director (Transport) South West Region, Tollgate Hookplan Limited House, Houlton Street, Bristol
  • Region Variables

    Region Variables

    National Child Development Study Revised Region Variables Jane Elliott, Jon Johnson and Peter Shepherd User guide to the data (Third Edition) March 2012 Centre for Longitudinal Studies Following lives from birth through the adult years 1 www.cls.ioe.ac.uk CLS is an ESRC Resource Centre based at the Institute of Education, London First published in 2009 by the Centre for Longitudinal Studies Institute of Education, University of London 20 Bedford Way London WC1H 0AL www.cls.ioe.ac.uk © Centre for Longitudinal Studies The Centre for Longitudinal Studies (CLS) is an ESRC Resource Centre based at the Institution of Education. It provides support and facilities for those using the three internationally-renowned birth cohort studies: the National Child Development Study (1958), the 1970 British Cohort Study and the Millennium Cohort Study (2000). CLS conducts research using the birth cohort study data, with a special interest in family life and parenting, family economics, youth life course transitions and basic skills. The views expressed in this work are those of the author(s) (amend as necessary) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Economic and Social Research Council. All errors and omissions remain those of the author(s). This document is available in alternative formats. Please contact the Centre for Longitudinal Studies. tel: +44 (0)20 7612 6875 email: [email protected] 2 Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................
  • The Statistical Bias Against Unitary Counties

    The Statistical Bias Against Unitary Counties

    THE STATISTICAL BIAS AGAINST UNITARY COUNTIES How local government reorganisation has hidden deprivation and threatens to strip authorities of funding Steve Fothergill and Tony Gore Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research Sheffield Hallam University Final report October 2011 This report has been funded by Durham County Council. An additional input of Prof Fothergill’s time was provided by the Industrial Communities Alliance, the all-party association of local authorities in Britain’s industrial areas. 1 Contents Summary 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE REPORT The nature of the problem The report 2. THE AVAILABILITY OF STATISTICS The authorities affected by reorganisation Review of published data Data availability: some conclusions 3. THE IMPACT ON THE MEASUREMENT OF DISADVANTAGE A working method Indices of Deprivation DWP benefits data The impact: an assessment 4. A SPECIAL CASE? The counter-argument The scale of the new unitary counties Why size matters Special case: an assessment 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS An unintended by-product of reorganisation Recommendations 2 Summary The reorganisation of local government in parts of England in 2009 has created a statistical anomaly. Whereas data for 36 former district councils is now being discontinued, figures continue to be produced for 201 districts within the surviving two-tier counties. This threatens to hide deprivation in the new unitary counties and, in turn, to erode the likelihood that some of these unitary counties will benefit from funding streams that target areas of disadvantage. This could develop into a major, on-going problem. It would be astonishing if, in the long run, statistics for local disadvantage did not continue to guide policy and funding even though current area-based initiatives are being run down.
  • Discounts by Location – Right to Acquire

    Discounts by Location – Right to Acquire

    Discounts by location – Right to Acquire March 2010 The amount of money you can get off the price of your home is shown by area in the table below. Your landlord will tell you what discount you will get when you apply to buy your home through the Right to Acquire scheme. A-Z list of Right to Acquire discounts by area Location Discount Bath and North East Somerset £11,000 Bedfordshire Bedford, Mid Bedfordshire, South Bedfordshire £11,000 Berkshire Reading, Slough, Windsor and Maidenhead, Wokingham £16,000 Bracknell Forest, West Berkshire £13,500 Blackburn with Darwen £9,000 Blackpool £9,000 Bournemouth £11,000 Brighton and Hove £16,000 Bristol £13,500 Buckinghamshire Chiltern, South Buckinghamshire £16,000 Aylesbury Vale, Wycombe £13,500 Cambridgeshire Cambridge £16,000 South Cambridge £13,500 East Cambridgeshire, Huntingdonshire £11,000 Fenland £9,000 Cheshire Macclesfield £11,000 Chester, Congleton, Vale Royal £10,000 Crewe and Nantwich, Ellesmere Port and Neston £9,000 Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly The Isles of Scilly £16,000 Carrick £11,000 Caradon, Kerrier, North Cornwall, Penwith, Restormel £10,000 Cumbria South Lakeland £10,000 Allerdale, Barrow-in-Furness, Carlisle, Copeland, Eden £9,000 Darlington £9,000 Derby £9,000 Derbyshire Derbyshire Dales, High Peak £10,000 Amber Valley, Bolsover, Chesterfield, Erewash, North £9,000 East Derbyshire, South Derbyshire Devon South Hams, West Devon £11,000 East Devon, Exeter, Mid Devon, North Devon, £10,000 Teignbridge, Torridge Dorset Christchurch, East Dorset £13,500 North Dorset, Purbeck,
  • New Unitary Councils

    New Unitary Councils

    © Oscar Research 2011 New Unitary Councils Table showing old Councils names and the names of the new Unitary Councils which replaced them and have been in place since April 2009. New Unitary Name Existing Councils Bedford Borough Council (Unitary) Bedford Borough Council Central Bedfordshire Bedfordshire County Council Mid Bedfordshire District Council South Bedfordshire District Council Cheshire East/West Cheshire County Council Chester City Council Congleton Borough Council Crewe and Nantwich Borough Council Ellesmere Port and Neston Borough Council Macclesfield Borough Council Vale Royal Borough Council Cornwall Caradon District Council Carrick District Council Cornwall County Council Kerrier District Council North Cornwall District Council © Oscar Research 2011 Penwith District Council Restormel Borough Council Durham Chester -le -Street District Council Derwentside District Council District of Easington Durham City Council Durham County Council Sedgefield Borough Council Teesdale District Council Wear Valley District Council Northumberland Alnwick District Council Berwick -upon -Tweed Borough Council Blyth Valley Borough Council Castle Morpeth Borough Council Northumberland County Council Tynedale District Council Wansbeck District Council Shropshire Bridgnorth District Council North Shropshire District Council Oswestry Borough Council Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council © Oscar Research 2011 Shropshire County Council South Shropshire District Council Wiltshire Kennet District Council North Wiltshire District Council Salisbury District Council West Wiltshire District Council Wiltshire County Council .
  • Annex 3. Rent Standard Guidance

    Annex 3. Rent Standard Guidance

    CONSULTATION ON CHANGES TO THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK Annex 3. Rent Standard Guidance May 2014 Annex 3. Rent Standard Guidance Contents Rent Standard Guidance Page 1 Introduction 2 2 General guidance 4 3 Social rent guidance 5 4 Affordable Rent guidance 11 5 Rents for social housing tenants with high incomes 14 6 Further information 16 Appendix 1 Rent Standard 17 Appendix 2 Detailed information on calculating formula rents 19 Appendix 3 Additional guidance on property valuation under the Rent Standard 25 Appendix 4 RICS guidance on valuation for Affordable Rent 37 1 1 Introduction The Rent Standard requires that “registered providers shall charge rents in accordance with the Government’s direction to the regulator of May 2014.” This replaces the direction of November 2011 and introduces several changes which are described below. The full wording of the Standard is set out at Appendix 1 in this guidance. This document – the Rent Standard Guidance – replaces that which took effect from April 2012. The previous version had consolidated all of the previous guidance first issued by the Housing Corporation and adopted by its successor social housing regulator bodies. It is guidance issued in relation to the requirements of the Rent Standard that applies from 1 April 2015. The Rent Standard also requires private registered providers (PRPs) to meet the ‘key requirements’ set out within the Rent Standard Guidance. This guidance sets out the following: Key requirements Those matters which are key elements of compliance with the Rent Standard. This