DOCSLIB.ORG

Quotations from Ancient Greek and Roman Authors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quotations from Ancient Greek and Roman Authors Quotations from Ancient Greek and Roman Authors On Anonymi Achilles Tatius, Introductio in Aratum 21: 202 n.19. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.14.4: 50 n.16. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.24.5: 183 n.50. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.29.4: 9, 206 n.38. Agathemerus, Geography 1.1.2: 9, 22 n.13. Aristotle, De Caelo 293b21 25:̶ 187 n.61. Aristotle, De Caelo 294a1–4: 21 n.11, 253 n.65. Aristotle, De Caelo 294b33: 256 n.77. Aristotle, Meteorologica 345b9: 168 n.3. Aristotle, Meteorologica 354a28–32: 8, 30 n.46, 109, 119 n.68. Diogenes of Oinoanda, fr. 66: 136 n.19. Epicurus, On Nature ĪĀ [33] Arrighetti, from Herculaneum Papyri 1042.8.vi: 8, 20 n.6, 121 n.79. Geneva scholium on Ilias 21.196: 140 n.50. Herodotus, Historiae 4.25: 43 n.81. Herodotus, Historiae 4.36: 22 n.12. Herodotus, Historiae 4.42: 251 n.55. Manilius, Astronomica 1.718–761: 168 n.2. On Anaxagoras Achilles Tatius, Introductio in Aratum 21: 202 n.19. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.8.1: 27 n.26, 52 n.25. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.13.3: 182, n.49. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.20.6: 202 n.21. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.21.3: 177 n.29, 221 n.1. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.25.9: 7, 201 n.15, 207. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.28.5: 203 n.24. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.29.2: 340 n.33. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018 343 D. L. Couprie, When the Earth Was Flat, Historical & Cultural Astronomy, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97052-3 344 Quotations from Ancient Greek and Roman Authors Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.29.4: 9, 206 n.38. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.29.6: 178 n.31, 205 n.32. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.30.2: 207 n.44. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 3.1.5: 172 n.16. Aëtius in Stobaeus, Anthologium 1.15.6: 27 n.26, 52 n.25. Aëtius in Stobaeus, Anthologium 1.24.1: 182 n.49. Aëtius in Stobaeus, Anthologium 1.25.1: 202 n.21. Aëtius in Stobaeus, Anthologium 1.26.1: 201 n.15. Aëtius in Stobaeus, Anthologium 1.26.2: 203 n.23. Aëtius in Stobaeus, Anthologium 1.26.3: 179 n.32, 204 n.31. Aëtius in Stobaeus, Anthologium 1.26.4: 207 n.43. Aëtius in Stobaeus, Anthologium 1.27.1: 172 n.16. Alexander Aphrodisiensis, In Aristotelis Meteorologica, 37.28: 170 n.9. Aristotle, De Caelo 294a1–4: 21 n.11, 253 n.65. Aristotle, Meteorologica 345a25–31: 169 n.5. Aristotle, Meteorologica 345a33–38: 173 n.20. Diogenes Laërtius, Vitae Philosophorum 2.8: 177 n.29, 197 n.5, 221 n.3, 228 n.28. Diogenes Laërtius, Vitae Philosophorum 2.9: 25 n.21, 52 n.25. Diogenes Laërtius, Vitae Philosophorum 2.10: 35 n.60, 177 n.28. Diogenes Laërtius, Vitae Philosophorum 2.12: 209 n.62. Herodotus, Historiae 2.22.1: 33 n.55. Hippolytus, Refutatio Omnium Haeresium 1.8.6: 176 n.27, 182 n.49, 202 n.20. Hippolytus, Refutatio Omnium Haeresium 1.8.8: 177 n.29, 203 n.26, 221 n.2. Hippolytus, Refutatio Omnium Haeresium 1.8.9: 176 n.27, 183 n.52. Hippolytus, Refutatio Omnium Haeresium 1.8.10: 173 n.17, 176 n.27, 205 n.35. Olympiodorus, In Aristotelis Meteora 67.32: 69 n.13, 170 n.12, 211 n.68. Origenes, Contra Celsum 5.11: 201 n.18. Plato, Apologia 26D1: 197 n.6. Plato, Cratylus 409A7–B10: 203 n.28. Plato, Phaedo 97B: 228 n.28. Plutarch, Face on the moon 929b: 203 n.27, 213 n.78. Plutarch, Face on the moon 932a: 221 n.5. Plutarch, Nicias 23.2: 208 n.53. Plutarch, De E apud Delphos: 204 n.29. Scholium on Apollonius of Rhodes 1.498: 197 n.7. Theodoretus, Curatio affectionum Graecarum 1.97: 221 n.4. Theodoretus, Curatio affectionum Graecarum 4.22: 221 n.4. Valerius Maximus, Facta et Dicta Memorabilia 8.11: 183 n.52. On Anaximander Achilles Tatius, Introductio in Aratum 19: 57 n.43. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.15.6: 77 n.8. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.16.5: 117 n.60. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.20.1: 53 n.29, 55 n.32, 56 n.35, 57 n.41, 78 n.15. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.21.1: 78 n.16, 79. Quotations from Ancient Greek and Roman Authors 345 Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.24.2: 64 n.2, 77 n.11. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.25.1: 53 n.29, 55 n.33, 56 n.36, 57 n.42, 59 n.50, 78 n.18. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.29.1: 64 n.3. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 3.3.1: 58 n.46. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 3.10.2: 51 n.23. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 5.19.4: 48 n.5. Aëtius in Stobaeus, Anthologium 1.22.3: 146 n.83. Aëtius in Stobaeus, Anthologium 1.24.1: 55 n.34, 77 n.8, 182 n.47. Aëtius in Stobaeus, Anthologium 1.24.2: 117 n.60. Aëtius in Stobaeus, Anthologium 1.25.1: 53 n.29, 55 n.32, 56 n.35, 57 n.41, 64 n.2, 77 n.11, 78 n.15, 78 n.16, 79 n.22, 79 n.23. Aëtius in Stobaeus, Anthologium 1.26.1: 53 n.29, 55 n.33, 56 n.36, 57 n.42, 59 n.50. Aëtius in Stobaeus, Anthologium 1.26.3: 64 n.3. Aëtius in Stobaeus, Anthologium 1.29.1: 58 n.46. Aristotle, Meteorologica 354a28–32: 8, 30 n.46, 109, 119 n.68. Cedrenus, Compendium Historiarum 277, lines 2–3: 64 n.6. Claudius Aelianus, Varia Historia 3.17: 83 n.31. Diogenes Laërtius, Vitae Philosophorum 2.1.1: 76 n.5, 83 n.32, 241 n.2. Eusebius, Preparatio Evangelica 10.14.11: 76 n.5. Eusebius, Preparatio Evangelica 15.23.1: 79 n.22. Eusebius, Preparatio Evangelica 15.24.1: 79 n.23. Hippolytus, Refutatio Omnium Haeresium 1.6.3: 51 n.23. Hippolytus, Refutatio Omnium Haeresium 1.6.4: 53 n.28, 56 n.37. Hippolytus, Refutatio Omnium Haeresium 1.6.4–5: 63 n.1, 182 n.47. Hippolytus, Refutatio Omnium Haeresium 1.6.5: 77 n.9, 78 n.17. Pliny, Natural History 2.30–31: 59 n.53. Pseudo-Galen, De Historia Philosopha 62.1–3: 79 n.22. Pseudo-Galen, De Historia Philosopha 63,1–2: 79 n.23. Pseudo-Galen, De Historia Philosopha 67.1: 6, 78 n.20. Pseudo-Plutarch, Stromata 2: 48 n.3, 51 n.23, 78 n.14. Qusṭā ibn Lūqā in Daiber 1980, 155: 78 n.19. Simplicius, In Aristotelis De Caelo Commentaria 471.1–11: 76 n.6, 77 n.12. Strabo, Geographica 1.1.11: 83 n.33. Suda, Lexicon alpha: 76 n.5. On Anaximenes Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.14.3: 124 n.90. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.14.4: 50 n.16. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.16.6: 114 n.50. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 2.22.1: 50 n.16, 50 n.17. Aëtius in pseudo-Plutarch, Placita 3.15.8: 30 n.43, 101 n.10. Aëtius in Stobaeus, Anthologium 1.22.3: 146 n.83. Aëtius in Stobaeus, Anthologium 1.24.1: 115 n.52, 124 n.90, 182 n.48. Aristotle, De Caelo 294b13–21: 30 n.41, 101 n.8. Aristotle, Meteorologica 354a28–32: 8, 30 n.46, 109, 119 n.68. 346 Quotations from Ancient Greek and Roman Authors Diogenes Laërtius, Vitae Philosophorum 2.3: 115 n.54. Eusebius, Preparatio Evangelica 15.47.3: 115 n.53. Hippolytus, Refutatio Omnium Haeresium 1.7.4: 30 n.44, 101 n.7. Hippolytus, Refutatio Omnium Haeresium 1.7.6: 9, 20 n.2, 35 n.61, 99 n.2, 248 n.40, 321 n.3. Pseudo-Plutarch, Stromata 3: 30 n.42, 101 n.9. Qusṭā ibn Lūqā, in Daiber 153: 114 n.51. Theon of Smyrna, Expositio 198.14–199.3: 179 n.35. On Archelaus Aëtius in Stobaeus, Anthologium 1.22.3: 146 n.83. Hippolytus, Refutatio Omnium Haeresium 1.9.4: 20 n.3, 26 n.25, 42 n.75, 52 n.25, 250 n.47. Hippolytus, Refutatio Omnium Haeresium 1.9.4–5: 42 n.77. Turba Philosophorum, Sermo 5: 42 n.78. On Archilochus Aëtius in Stobaeus, Anthologium 4.46.10: 234 n.51. Aristotle Analitica Posteriora I.xiii: 256 n.79. Analitica Posteriora I.xxxi: 256 n.79. Analitica Posteriora 78b4–12: 199 n.12. Analitica Posteriora 78b39: 256 n.80. De Caelo 284b6–286a2: 252 n.59. De Caelo 287a6–12: 253 n.64. De Caelo 290b19: 40 n.68. De Caelo 291b11–23: 253 n.64. De Caelo 291b18–23: 199 n.12. De Caelo 291b23: 252 n.63. De Caelo 292b20: 256 n.81. De Caelo 293b21–25: 187 n.61. De Caelo 293b25–29: 175 n.25, 245 n.23. De Caelo 294a1–4: 21 n.11, 253 n.65. De Caelo 294a5–7: 253 n.66. De Caelo 294a8: 254 n.71. De Caelo 294a9–10: 254 n.72. De Caelo 294a22–25: 132 n.4. De Caelo 294a26–28: 133 n.8.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Pythagorean' Kingship Treatises
    Meeting Different Needs The Implied Readers ofthe ‘Pythagorean’ Kingship Treatises Michael Trapp To cite this version: Michael Trapp. Meeting Different Needs The Implied Readers of the ‘Pythagorean’ Kingship Treatises. KTÈMA Civilisations de l’Orient, de la Grèce et de Rome antiques, Université de Strasbourg, 2020, Les traités néopythagoriciens Sur la royauté, 45, pp.143-160. halshs-03071732 HAL Id: halshs-03071732 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03071732 Submitted on 16 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. KTÈMA KTÈMA KTÈMA CIVILISATIONS DE L’ORIENT, DE LA GRÈCE ET DE ROME ANTIQUES CIVILISATIONS DE L’ORIENT, DE LA GRÈCE ET DE ROME ANTIQUES KTÈMA est une revue annuelle de recherche consacrée à l’histoire, l’archéologie et la littérature de la Grèce, de Rome, de l’Égypte et du Les traités néopythagoriciens Sur la royauté Proche-Orient antiques. Fondée en 1976 par Edmond Frézouls et Anne Gangloff Introduction ..............................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • De Theognide Megarensi. Nietzsche on Theognis of Megara. a Bilingual Edition
    FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE De Theognide Megarensi Nietzsche on Theognis of Megara – A Bilingual Edition – Translated by R. M. Kerr THE NIETZSCHE CHANNEL Friedrich Nietzsche De Theognide Megarensi Nietzsche on Theognis of Megara A bilingual edition Translated by R. M. Kerr ☙ editio electronica ❧ _________________________________________ THE N E T ! " # H E # H A N N E $ % MM&' Copyright © Proprietas interpretatoris Roberti Martini Kerrii anno 2015 Omnia proprietatis iura reservantur et vindicantur. Imitatio prohibita sine auctoris permissione. Non licet pecuniam expetere pro aliquo, quod partem horum verborum continet; liber pro omnibus semper gratuitus erat et manet. Sic rerum summa novatur semper, et inter se mortales mutua vivunt. augescunt aliae gentes, aliae invuntur, inque brevi spatio mutantur saecla animantum et quasi cursores vitai lampada tradiunt. - Lucretius - - de Rerum Natura, II 5-! - PR"#$CE %e &or' presente( here is a trans)ation o* #rie(rich Nietzsche-s aledi!tionsarbeit ./schoo) e0it-thesis12 *or the "andesschule #$orta in 3chu)p*orta .3axony-$nhalt) presente( on 3epte4ber th 15678 It has hitherto )arge)y gone unnotice(, especial)y in anglophone Nietzsche stu(- ies8 $t the ti4e though, the &or' he)pe( to estab)ish the reputation o* the then twenty year o)( Nietzsche and consi(erab)y *aci)itate( his )ater acade4ic career8 9y a)) accounts, it &as a consi(erab)e achie:e4ent, especial)y consi(ering &hen it &as &ri;en: it entai)e( an e0pert 'no&)e(ge, not =ust o* c)assical-phi)o)ogical )iterature, but also o* co(ico)ogy8 %e recent =u(ge4ent by >"+3"+ .2017<!!2< “It is a piece that, ha( Nietzsche ne:er &ri;en another &or(, &ou)( ha:e assure( his p)ace, albeit @uite a s4a)) one, in the history o* Ger4an phi)o)ogyB su4s the 4atter up quite e)o@uently8 +ietzsche )ater continue( his %eognis stu(ies, the sub=ect o* his Crst scho)ar)y artic)e, as a stu(ent at Leip,ig, in 156 D to so4e e0tent a su44ary o* the present &or' D a critical re:ie& in 156!, as &e)) as @uotes in se:eral )e;ers *ro4 1567 on.
    [Show full text]
  • Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece
    Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Ancient Greek Philosophy but didn’t Know Who to Ask Edited by Patricia F. O’Grady MEET THE PHILOSOPHERS OF ANCIENT GREECE Dedicated to the memory of Panagiotis, a humble man, who found pleasure when reading about the philosophers of Ancient Greece Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece Everything you always wanted to know about Ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask Edited by PATRICIA F. O’GRADY Flinders University of South Australia © Patricia F. O’Grady 2005 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Patricia F. O’Grady has asserted her right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identi.ed as the editor of this work. Published by Ashgate Publishing Limited Ashgate Publishing Company Wey Court East Suite 420 Union Road 101 Cherry Street Farnham Burlington Surrey, GU9 7PT VT 05401-4405 England USA Ashgate website: http://www.ashgate.com British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Meet the philosophers of ancient Greece: everything you always wanted to know about ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask 1. Philosophy, Ancient 2. Philosophers – Greece 3. Greece – Intellectual life – To 146 B.C. I. O’Grady, Patricia F. 180 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Meet the philosophers of ancient Greece: everything you always wanted to know about ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask / Patricia F.
    [Show full text]
  • ELECTRYONE ΗΛΕΚΤΡΥΩΝΗ Theognis and the Social Role of Measure
    ELECTRYONE ΗΛΕΚΤΡΥΩΝΗ Theognis and the Social Role of Measure. Matus Porubjak, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Trnava ABSTRACT: The paper deals with the beginnings of the Greek ethical discourse in elegies of an archaic lyric poet Theognis of Megara. In the introduction author shortly discusses the question of origin and influence of the Theognidea. Then he gradually follows and interprets the occurrences of the expression “μηδὲν ἄγαν” (Nothing in excess), of the words σωφροσύνη (soundness of mind), σάοφρων (temperate), μέτρον (measure) and μέτριος (moderate), according to the problem of ἀρετή (excellence). On the basis of symposium description in the Theognidea and its functions, author shows the crucial social dimension of researched capabilities. He also tries to show how Theognis grasps the wisdom as a quality that has to be tried for and cared for. In the end author states that for Theognis the excellences such as wisdom, justice, sound mind and proper measure are conditio sine qua non for functioning of all social relations – from erotic relations through symposium to polis itself. KEY-WORDS: Theognis, Solon, temperate, measure, moderate, excellence, justice, wisdom, polis, social behaviour According to the interpretative tradition Socrates followed two Delphic maxims: “γνῶθι σαυτὸν” (Know thyself) and “μηδὲν ἄγαν”(Nothing in excess). These two maxims were so determinative for discourse of ancient philosophy and ethics (including Hellenic) that the whole ancient ethics could be in a simplified way understood as an effort to their reinterpretation and practical application. The aim of this study is to notice some aspects of beginnings of this discourse in elegies of an archaic lyric poet Theognis of Megara, in particular of the maxim “Nothing in excess”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fragments of the Poem of Parmenides
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by D-Scholarship@Pitt RESTORING PARMENIDES’ POEM: ESSAYS TOWARD A NEW ARRANGEMENT OF THE FRAGMENTS BASED ON A REASSESSMENT OF THE ORIGINAL SOURCES by Christopher John Kurfess B.A., St. John’s College, 1995 M.A., St. John’s College, 1996 M.A., University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, 2000 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2012 UNVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH The Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences This dissertation was presented by Christopher J. Kurfess It was defended on November 8, 2012 and approved by Dr. Andrew M. Miller, Professor, Department of Classics Dr. John Poulakos, Associate Professor, Department of Communication Dr. Mae J. Smethurst, Professor, Department of Classics Dissertation Supervisor: Dr. Edwin D. Floyd, Professor, Department of Classics ii Copyright © by Christopher J. Kurfess 2012 iii RESTORING PARMENIDES’ POEM Christopher J. Kurfess, Ph.D. University of Pittsburgh, 2012 The history of philosophy proper, claimed Hegel, began with the poem of the Presocratic Greek philosopher Parmenides. Today, that poem is extant only in fragmentary form, the various fragments surviving as quotations, translations or paraphrases in the works of better-preserved authors of antiquity. These range from Plato, writing within a century after Parmenides’ death, to the sixth-century C.E. commentator Simplicius of Cilicia, the latest figure known to have had access to the complete poem. Since the Renaissance, students of Parmenides have relied on collections of fragments compiled by classical scholars, and since the turn of the twentieth century, Hermann Diels’ Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, through a number of editions, has remained the standard collection for Presocratic material generally and for the arrangement of Parmenides’ fragments in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Hestia: the Indo-European Goddess of the Cosmic Central Fire
    Hestia: The Indo-European Goddess of the Cosmic Central Fire Marcello De Martino Abstract: The Pythagorean Philolaus of Croton (470-390 BCE) created a unique model of the Universe and he placed at its centre a ‘fire’, around which the spheres of the Earth, the Counter-Earth, the five planets, the Sun, the Moon and the outermost sphere of fixed stars, also viewed as fire but of an ‘aethereal’ kind, were revolving. This system has been considered as a step towards the heliocentric model of Aristarchus of Samos (310-230 BCE), the astronomical theory opposed to the geocentric system, which already was the communis opinio at that time and would be so for many centuries to come: but is that really so? In fact, comparing the Greek data with those of other ancient peoples of Indo-European language, it can be assumed that the ‘pyrocentric’ system is the last embodiment of a theological tradition going back to ancient times: Hestia, the central fire, was the descendant of an Indo-European goddess of Hearth placed at the centre of the religious and mythological view of a deified Cosmos where the gods were essentially personifications of atmospheric phenomena and of celestial bodies. In 1960, an article came out in a scientific journal which specialised in topics which were a bit more eccentric that those of traditional research studies on the history of religions, especially the classical ones. Its title was On the Relation between Early Greek Scientific Thought and Mysticism: Is Hestia, the Central Fire, an Abstract Astronomical Concept?.1 The author was Rudolph E.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Date | 6/9/19 10:06 AM Pseudo-Pythagorean Literature 73
    Philologus 2019; 163(1): 72–94 Leonid Zhmud* What is Pythagorean in the Pseudo-Pythagorean Literature? https://doi.org/10.1515/phil-2018-0003 Abstract: This paper discusses continuity between ancient Pythagoreanism and the pseudo-Pythagorean writings, which began to appear after the end of the Pythagorean school ca. 350 BC. Relying on a combination of temporal, formal and substantial criteria, I divide Pseudopythagorica into three categories: 1) early Hellenistic writings (late fourth – late second centuries BC) ascribed to Pytha- goras and his family members; 2) philosophical treatises written mostly, yet not exclusively, in pseudo-Doric from the turn of the first century BC under the names of real or fictional Pythagoreans; 3) writings attributed to Pythagoras and his relatives that continued to appear in the late Hellenistic and Imperial periods. I will argue that all three categories of pseudepigrapha contain astonishingly little that is authentically Pythagorean. Keywords: Pythagoreanism, pseudo-Pythagorean writings, Platonism, Aristote- lianism Forgery has been widespread in time and place and varied in its goals and methods, and it can easily be confused with superficially similar activities. A. Grafton Note: An earlier version of this article was presented at the colloquium “Pseudopythagorica: stratégies du faire croire dans la philosophie antique” (Paris, 28 May 2015). I would like to thank Constantinos Macris (CNRS) for his kind invitation. The final version was written during my fellowship at the IAS of Durham University and presented at the B Club, Cambridge, in Mai 2016. I am grateful to Gábor Betegh for inviting me to give a talk and to the audience for the vivid discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Early Pythagoreanism
    Women in Early Pythagoreanism Caterina Pellò Faculty of Classics University of Cambridge Clare Hall February 2018 This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Alla nonna Ninni, che mi ha insegnato a leggere e scrivere Abstract Women in Early Pythagoreanism Caterina Pellò The sixth-century-BCE Pythagorean communities included both male and female members. This thesis focuses on the Pythagorean women and aims to explore what reasons lie behind the prominence of women in Pythagoreanism and what roles women played in early Pythagorean societies and thought. In the first chapter, I analyse the social conditions of women in Southern Italy, where the first Pythagorean communities were founded. In the second chapter, I compare Pythagorean societies with ancient Greek political clubs and religious sects. Compared to mainland Greece, South Italian women enjoyed higher legal and socio-political status. Similarly, religious groups included female initiates, assigning them authoritative roles. Consequently, the fact that the Pythagoreans founded their communities in Croton and further afield, and that in some respects these communities resembled ancient sects helps to explain why they opened their doors to the female gender to begin with. The third chapter discusses Pythagoras’ teachings to and about women. Pythagorean doctrines did not exclusively affect the followers’ way of thinking and public activities, but also their private way of living. Thus, they also regulated key aspects of the female everyday life, such as marriage and motherhood. I argue that the Pythagorean women entered the communities as wives, mothers and daughters. Nonetheless, some of them were able to gain authority over their fellow Pythagoreans and engage in intellectual activities, thus overcoming the female traditional domestic roles.
    [Show full text]
  • Platonic and Stoic Passions in Philo of Alexandria Loren Kerns George Fox University, [email protected]
    Digital Commons @ George Fox University George Fox Evangelical Seminary 2013 Platonic and Stoic Passions in Philo of Alexandria Loren Kerns George Fox University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/gfes Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Church History Commons Recommended Citation Kerns, Loren, "Platonic and Stoic Passions in Philo of Alexandria" (2013). George Fox Evangelical Seminary. Paper 6. http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/gfes/6 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in George Fox Evangelical Seminary by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. Kings College London Platonic and Stoic Passions in Philo of Alexandria A Dissertation submitted to The School of Arts and Humanities In Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Theology and Religious Studies By Loren Kerns London, United Kingdom July 2013 Copyright by Loren Kerns, 2013 All rights reserved. Abstract Philo of Alexandria forged his theory of the soul and its passions while expositing the meaning of Torah. Though writing as a Jewish teacher and disciple of Moses, his biblical reflections display a strong orientation toward Middle-Platonic philosophy. On the topic of the soul and its passions, however, Philo also exhibits significant Stoic influence. The introduction notes Philo’s apparent incompatible use of both the complex Platonic and the monistic Stoic psychological models. After assessing the degree to which Philo understood 'passion' to be a type of Stoic impulse or opinion (chapter one), chapter two demonstrates that Philo consistently drew upon the Stoics’ depiction of all passions as irrational, excessive, and unnatural.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Narrative Volume 7
    J.R. MORGAN, M. JONES (eds.), Philosophical Presences in the Ancient Novel Ancient Narrative Supplements 10 Pp. 282. Groningen: Barkhuis & Groningen University Library, 2007. Hard- back. €84.80 ISBN 9-789077-922378 Review by Ilaria L. E. Ramelli, Catholic University of Milan, [email protected] This fine collection of essays originated from a conference panel organized by the KYKNOS Research Centre for Ancient Narrative Literature (Swan- sea, Lampeter, and Exeter Universities). It is devoted to an assessment of the presence of philosophy, in various forms, in the Greek novels. First of all, for an investigation of this sort to be fruitful and methodol- ogically careful, it is necessary to determine what exactly “philosophy” means in the cultural context in which the Greek novels arose. This clarifica- tion is duly provided by the first essay: Michael Trapp, “What is This Phi- losophia Anyway?” (pp. 1–22). He explains how philosophy was understood in the Hellenistic and Roman periods,1 and includes in his discussion defini- tions of “philosophy” taken from Alcinoous’ Didaskalikos, Seneca, Lucian, Plutarch, and Maximus of Tyre, all belonging to the first two centuries of the Imperial era. In addition to these, however, texts such as the Cebetis Tabula, with its ethical allegories, are taken into consideration, and particular atten- tion is paid to Plutarch’s essays on moral progress, a notion that was val- orised – I should remark – in Roman Stoicism as well.2 The theoretical side of philosophy was especially stressed by Platonism (at least in Middle- Platonism and in Neoplatonism); the practical side was privileged by Roman ————— 1 A good survey, not cited here, is J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethical Formation of the Hippocratic Physician Joseph A
    ABSTRACT The Hippocratics in Context: The Ethical Formation of the Hippocratic Physician Joseph A. Lloyd Director: Joseph A. DiLuzio, Ph.D. The Hippocratic Oath is widely known today as something that medical students say at their graduation ceremony as they are about to go out into the world and begin their practice of medicine. This long-standing tradition goes back centuries, and begs the question of why this is done? Who was Hippocrates, and what did he and the physicians he taught use the Hippocratic Oath for? In order to answer this question, one must have an understanding of several things about ancient Greece: the history of education in ancient Greece, communities of physicians contemporary with Hippocrates, the Hippocratic Corpus, and Hippocrates himself. In this thesis I provide this context in order to elucidate how the Hippocratic Oath was used in the education of Hippocratic physicians in fifth century BCE Greece. APPROVED BY DIRECTOR OF HONORS THESIS: ___________________________________________________ Dr. Joseph A. DiLuzio, Department of Classics APPROVED BY THE HONORS PROGRAM: ___________________________________________________ Dr. Elizabeth Corey, Director DATE: _________________________ THE HIPPOCRATICS IN CONTEXT: THE ETHICAL FORMATION OF THE HIPPOCRATIC PHYSICIAN A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Baylor University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Honors Program By Joseph A. Lloyd Waco, Texas August 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction iii Chapter One: Ancient Greek Medical Schools: Cyrene, Croton, Cnidus, and Rhodes 1 Chapter Two: The Hippocratic Medical School at Cos 20 Chapter Three: The Ethics of the Hippocratic Oath 32 Conclusion 47 Appendices 49 Appendix A: The Hippocratic Oath Bibliography 52 ii INTRODUCTION The age of modernity is an age of moral subjectivism; all but gone are the days of a belief in an objective moral truth, the Truth to which Socrates refers in Plato’s writings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complete Pythagoras
    THE COMPLETE PYTHAGORAS INDEX INTRODUCTION VOLUME ONE Biographies Iamblichus i) Importance of the Subject ii) Youth, Education, Travels iii) Journey to Egypt iv) Studies in Egypt and Babylonia v) Travels in Greece, Settlement at Crotona vi) Pythagorean Community vii) Italian Political Achievements viii) Intuition, Reverence, Temperance, Studiousness ix) Community and Chastity x) Advice to Youths xi) Advice to Women xii) Why he calls himself a Pythagorean xiii) He shared Orpheus’s Control over Animals xiv) Pythagoras ’s preexistence xv) He Cured by Medicine and Music xvi) Pythagorean Aestheticism xvii) Tests of Initiation xviii) Organization of the Pythagorean School xix) Abaris the Scythian xx) Psychological Requirements xxi) Daily Program xxii) Friendship xxiii) Use of parables in Instruction xxiv) Dietary Suggestions xxv) Music and poetry xxvi) Theoretical Music xxvii) Mutual political Assistance xxviii) Divinity of Pythagoras xxix) Sciences and Maxims xxx) Justice and politics xxxi) Temperance and Self-control xxxii) Fortitude xxxiii) Universal Friendship xxxiv) Nonmercenary Secrecy xxxv) Attack on Pythagoreanism xxxvi) The Pythagorean Succession Porphry Photius Diogenes Laertius i) Early Life ii) Studies iii) Initiations iv) Transmigration v) Works vi) General Views on Life vii) Ages of Life viii) Social Customs ix) Distinguished Appearance x) Women Deified by Marriage xi) Scientific culture xii) Diet and Sacrifices xiii) Measures and Weights xiv) Hesperus Identified with Lucifer xv) Students and Reputations xvi) Friendship Founded
    [Show full text]