11872 Indiana Fact Sheet 2017 Data

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

NORFOLK SOUTHERN IN INDIANA CHICAGO ELKHART BEHIND EVERY NS TRAIN IS AN FORT WAYNE EXTENSIVE NETWORK OF TRACK MARION AND TERMINALS, A FLEET OF ns OPERATIONS LAFAYETTE FRANKFORT Auto Distribution SOPHISTICATED LOCOMOTIVES MUNCIE Facility ANDERSON AND FREIGHT CARS, AND A TEAM Locomotive Shop MACON OF DEDICATED EMPLOYEES WHO INDIANAPOLIS Port Served WORK AROUND THE CLOCK TO Rail Yard Rail-Truck PROVIDE SAFE AND RELIABLE Transfer Facility NS Lines or Local RAIL TRANSPORTATION. Freight Rights HUNTINGBURG ...... NS Trackage/ Haulage Rights PRINCETON LOUISVILLE, KY Not all lines shown. INFRASTRUCTURE 1,440 560 2,670 in Indiana Miles of Track Bridges Grade Crossings Operated (public and private) what NS moves by rail in the HOOSIEr state agricultural metals & OUTBOUND products construction automotive coal chemicals 7000 7000 35% 31% 24% 8% 2% 7000 INBOUND metals & agricultural paper, clay & 7000 coal construction products chemicals automotive forest products 7000 7000 36% 32% 13% 9% 6% 4% 2017 carloads. Norfolk Southern and the Indiana Cmunity metals & PEOPLE partnershipsconstruction ELKHART YARD % 32 The second largest rail yard on the NS system has 72 classification tracks to help move agricultural, steel, NS Employees BUSINESS MAGNET 2,620 chemical/ethanol, and automotive NS helped 6 industries locate products. Each day, more than 100 Railroad Retirement Recipients 1,030 or expand in 2017, resulting in: trains pass through Elkhart Yard. $ CUSTOMER 17 million INVESTMENT ECONOMIC impact CHARITABLE GIVING The NS Foundation contributed pays $ million $ To Indiana 180 825,000 Communities over the last five years. PAYROLL invests CONNECTIONS $ million NS tracks connect with 118 short line railroads in Indiana. INFRASTRUCTURE & FACILITIES 25 pends $ MILLION PASSENGER RAIL 131 Amtrak operates 14 regularly scheduled passenger PURCHASES, PAYMENTS, & TAXES trains over NS tracks in Indiana. connect with NS ©2018 Norfolk Southern Corporation. All rights reserved. www.nscorp.com 2017 data. 10.1016.11872.1.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its
United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator.
[Show full text]
Issue of Play on October 4 & 5 at the "The 6 :,53"
I the 'It, 980 6:53 OCTOBER !li AMTRAK... ... now serving BRYAN and LOVELAND ... returns to INDIA,NAPOLIS then turns em away Amtrak's LAKE SHORE LIMITED With appropriate "first trip" is now making regular stops inaugural festivities, Amtrak every day at BRYAN in north introduced daily operation of western Ohio. The westbound its new HOOSIER STATE on the train stops at 11:34am and 1st of October between IND the eastbound train stops at IANAPOLIS and CHICAGO. Sev 8:15pm. eral OARP members were on the Amtrak's SHENANDOAH inaugural trip, including Ray is now stopping daily at a Kline, Dave Marshall and Nick new station stop in suburban Noe. Complimentary champagne Cincinnati. The eastbound was served to all passengers SHENANDOAH stops at LOVELAND and Amtrak public affairs at 7:09pm and the westbound representatives passed out train stops at 8:15am. A m- Amtrak literature. One of trak began both new stops on the Amtrak reps was also pas Sunday, October 26th. Sev sing out OARP brochures! [We eral OARP members were on don't miss an opportunity!] hand at both stations as the Our members reported that the "first trains" rolled in. inaugural round trip was a OARP has supported both new good one, with on-time oper station stops and we are ation the whole way. Tracks glad they have finally come permit 70mph speeds much of about. Both communities are the way and the only rough supportive of their new Am track was noted near Chicago. trak service. How To Find Amtrak held another in its The Station Maps for both series of FAMILY DAYS with BRYAN qnd LOVELAND will be much equipment on public dis fopnd' inside this issue of play on October 4 & 5 at the "the 6 :,53".
[Show full text]
All Aboard Indiana September 2017
ALL INDIANA ABOARD The Official Newsletter of the Volume 4, Number 9 September 2017 IN THIS ISSUE: Coxhead Urges Patience with CSX Page Two USA TODAY Article Tells as “Heat” Turned Up on Railroad Readers: Feds Urging CSX By Donald Yehle To Fix Problems Here’s a summary of the “train delay” situation as it affects the Hoosier State and Cardinal trains. Seven-Day Cardinal Push Taken to State Government “CSX (Transportation) hosts the Hoosier State in Indiana, and the Cardinal in several states. Cardinal On-Time Performance With the new top management at CSX, many organizational changes are being implemented, Lafayette Train Volunteer very rapidly. This has led to severe operational problems at CSX, affecting their freight opera- Speaks Out on Rail Issues tions as well as Amtrak operations,” writes Steve Coxhead, president, Indiana Passenger Rail (continued on p 3-4) Alliance (IPRA). Page Three The Surface Transportation Board (STB) has become concerned and is asking CSX to explain why Lafayette Train Volunteer they are having problems, and when they will be resolved. They have specifically noted the effect CSX internal problems are having on Amtrak service (including the Hoosier State and Cardinal). Speaks Out on Rail Issues Part of the reason for STB concern was the receipt of complaints from shippers’ groups from sev- (story spans p. 2-4) eral industries, to the effect that CSX was not providing reliable freight service. These problems, as occurring across the CSX system, are most likely the cause of the poor performance many of Page Four you have been seeing, he continues.
[Show full text]
Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations
Pursuant to Section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-432, Division B): Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations Covering the Quarter Ended June, 2019 (Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2019) Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation Published August 2019 Table of Contents (Notes follow on the next page.) Financial Table 1 (A/B): Short-Term Avoidable Operating Costs (Note 1) Table 2 (A/B): Fully Allocated Operating Cost covered by Passenger-Related Revenue Table 3 (A/B): Long-Term Avoidable Operating Loss (Note 1) Table 4 (A/B): Adjusted Loss per Passenger- Mile Table 5: Passenger-Miles per Train-Mile On-Time Performance (Table 6) Test No. 1 Change in Effective Speed Test No. 2 Endpoint OTP Test No. 3 All-Stations OTP Train Delays Train Delays - Off NEC Table 7: Off-NEC Host Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Table 8: Off-NEC Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Train Delays - On NEC Table 9: On-NEC Total Host and Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Other Service Quality Table 10: Customer Satisfaction Indicator (eCSI) Scores Table 11: Service Interruptions per 10,000 Train-Miles due to Equipment-related Problems Table 12: Complaints Received Table 13: Food-related Complaints Table 14: Personnel-related Complaints Table 15: Equipment-related Complaints Table 16: Station-related Complaints Public Benefits (Table 17) Connectivity Measure Availability of Other Modes Reference Materials Table 18: Route Descriptions Terminology & Definitions Table 19: Delay Code Definitions Table 20: Host Railroad Code Definitions Appendixes A.
[Show full text]
INDOT – INDIANA STATE RAIL PLAN Passenger Rail User Group Interview Questions
INDOT – INDIANA STATE RAIL PLAN Passenger Rail User Group Interview Questions GENERAL INFORMATION Date of Interview: October 16, 2020 Subject Name: Indiana Passenger Rail Alliance Location: Indianapolis (Interview via webex) Subject Representative: Steven Coxhead, President QUESTIONS 1. What does your organization do? How many employees and/or members does your organization have? We’re a volunteer nonprofit organization. We reach about 1,800 people through our publications. Our mission is to persuade the state to embrace passenger rail, and expand passenger rail travel options, including city to city, intrastate, commuter, and transit services. Our focus is on promoting corridors using conventional technology with travel speeds of 80 to 100 miles per hour. That’s an easier lift, technologically and financially, than establishing bullet train-type high speed rail services. Our goal is to encourage the state to support and establish modern passenger rail systems similar to those found in other parts of the United States. Our initial focus is on reinstating the Hoosier State corridor between Indianapolis and Chicago. We don’t get involved in political campaigns. We like to publicize what’s possible and what’s happening, and get support for public policy initiatives. 2. What makes people in Indiana decide to take a passenger train instead of driving or taking a bus or something else? What conditions would be necessary to convert more trips to passenger rail trips? Highway volumes continue to grow on I-65. Whenever new lanes are added, they fill up and congest immediately. Truck traffic is heavy on I-65. The traffic continues to grow and create constraints and inconveniences for drivers.
[Show full text]
Cardinal-Hoosier State-New York-Chicago-April062015
CARDINAL® APRIL 6, 2015 and HOOSIER STATE® Effective ® NEW YORK – and – CHICAGO Enjoy the journey. 1-800-USA-RAIL 1-800-USA-RAIL Call NEW YORK - WASHINGTON, DC CHARLOTTESVILLE - WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS CHARLESTON - CINCINNATI INDIANAPOLIS - CHICAGO and intermediate stations AMTRAK.COM AMTRAK.COM Visit NRPC Form P50–125M–4/6/15 Stock #02-3730 Schedules subject to change without notice. Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corp. National Railroad Passenger Corporation Washington Union Station, 60 Massachusetts Ave. N.E., Washington, DC 20002. CARDINAL and HOOSIER STATE Hoosier Hoosier CARDINAL and HOOSIER STATE Cardinal Train Name Cardinal State State ROUTE MAP and SYMBOLS Cardinal 851 51 Train Number 50 850 Hoosier State® Dp NYC Ar NYC ville, VA SuTuWeFr Normal Days of Operation SuMoWeFr , IN e, WV ork, NY SuWeFr WeFrSu Dyer Lafayette,Indianapolis, IN Cincinnati, IN South OH Portsmouth/SouthHuntington,Montgomery, WV PrincShore, WV KYAlderson,Clifton WV Forge,Charlottes VA Manassas,Washington, VA Wilmington, DC Trenton, DE NJNew Y R s R s A PA R R Chicago, IL rdsville, IN Ashland, KY Hinton, WV Staunton,Culpeper, VA V Newark, NJ On Board Service Rensselaer,fo IN Connersville,Maysville, IN KY Charleston,Thurmond, WV WV Alexandria,Baltimore, VA Philadelphia, MD r l r l Craw White Sulphur Springs, WV Read Down Mile Symbol Read Up $™l6 45A 0DpNEW YORK, NY (ET) ∑w- Ar l9 58P –Penn Station CHICCHICAGOCAGOO $™lR7 05A 10 Newark, NJ ∑w- lD9 38P NEWN W YYORKO K $™R7 42A 58 Trenton, NJ ∑w- D9 02P INDIANAPOLISNDIANDIANAPOANAPPOOL S $™lR8 15A 91 Philadelphia, PA–30th Street Sta.
[Show full text]
Amtrak: Overview
Amtrak: Overview David Randall Peterman Analyst in Transportation Policy September 28, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44973 Amtrak: Overview Summary Amtrak is the nation’s primary provider of intercity passenger rail service. It was created by Congress in 1970 to preserve some level of intercity passenger rail service while enabling private rail companies to exit the money-losing passenger rail business. It is a quasi-governmental entity, a corporation whose stock is almost entirely owned by the federal government. It runs a deficit each year, and relies on congressional appropriations to continue operations. Amtrak was last authorized in the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2015 (Title XI of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST Act; P.L. 114-94). That authorization expires at the end of FY2020. Amtrak’s annual appropriations do not rely on separate authorization legislation, but authorization legislation does allow Congress to set multiyear Amtrak funding goals and federal intercity passenger rail policies. Since Amtrak’s inception, Congress has been divided on the question of whether it should even exist. Amtrak is regularly criticized for failing to cover its costs. The need for federal financial support is often cited as evidence that passenger rail service is not financially viable, or that Amtrak should yield to private companies that would find ways to provide rail service profitably. Yet it is not clear that a private company could perform the same range of activities better than Amtrak does. Indeed, Amtrak was created because private-sector railroad companies in the United States lost money for decades operating intercity passenger rail service and wished to be relieved of the obligation to do so.
[Show full text]
Amtrak Station Program and Planning Guidelines 1
Amtrak Station Program and Planning Guidelines 1. Overview 5 6. Site 55 1.1 Background 5 6.1 Introduction 55 1.2 Introduction 5 6.2 Multi-modal Planning 56 1.3 Contents of the Guidelines 6 6.3 Context 57 1.4 Philosophy, Goals and Objectives 7 6.4 Station/Platform Conﬁ gurations 61 1.5 Governing Principles 8 6.5 Track and Platform Planning 65 6.6 Vehicular Circulation 66 6.7 Bicycle Parking 66 2. Process 11 6.8 Parking 67 2.1 Introduction 11 6.9 Amtrak Functional Requirements 68 2.2 Stakeholder Coordination 12 6.10 Information Systems and Way Finding 69 2.3 Concept Development 13 6.11 Safety and Security 70 2.4 Funding 14 6.12 Sustainable Design 71 2.5 Real Estate Transactional Documents 14 6.13 Universal Design 72 2.6 Basis of Design 15 2.7 Construction Documents 16 2.8 Project Delivery methods 17 7. Station 73 2.9 Commissioning 18 7.1 Introduction 73 2.10 Station Opening 18 7.2 Architectural Overview 74 7.3 Information Systems and Way Finding 75 7.4 Passenger Information Display System (PIDS) 77 3. Amtrak System 19 7.5 Safety and Security 78 3.1 Introduction 19 7.6 Sustainable Design 79 3.2 Service Types 20 7.7 Accessibility 80 3.3 Equipment 23 3.4 Operations 26 8. Platform 81 8.1 Introduction 81 4. Station Categories 27 8.2 Platform Types 83 4.1 Introduction 27 8.3 Platform-Track Relationships 84 4.2 Summary of Characteristics 28 8.4 Connection to the station 85 4.3 Location and Geography 29 8.5 Platform Length 87 4.4 Category 1 Large stations 30 8.6 Platform Width 88 4.5 Category 2 Medium Stations 31 8.7 Platform Height 89 4.6 Category 3 Caretaker Stations 32 8.8 Additional Dimensions and Clearances 90 4.7 Category 4 Shelter Stations 33 8.9 Safety and Security 91 4.8 Thruway Bus Service 34 8.10 Accessibility 92 8.11 Snow Melting Systems 93 5.
[Show full text]
Amtrak Hoosier State Train Schedule Gage
Amtrak Hoosier State Train Schedule Leftward Chet Russianizing, his acquirement repositions discourages o'clock. Ferinand is unreleased: she hustling thermochemically and gaffs her intonations. Jerald remains pericarpial after Marven embroider autodidactically or limber any licks. Url where you the amtrak train schedule and from detroit to tampa, and cn line the engineers found that amtrak operates the next monthly nsrl meeting. Closure of amtrak hoosier train schedule navigating through chicago by amtrak thruway, chicago are short suburban routes that will introduce their thoughts with car. Assign your amtrak schedule for it looks like you contact your purchase. Disregard this train to amtrak hoosier schedule navigating through wv and san diego to la? Agents when hoosier schedule to book your trip is like something to. Tagged with trains, train schedule changes made to get from chicago to board before the authors accept responsibility for. Providing access your state schedule for the opportunity is a train will rebook affected as income. Bathroom on the full steam ahead, in becoming more trains and prices are always busy. Delete any app and amtrak hoosier train schedule an easy to load a regular seat at any additional travel alternatives for. Cuts really cost of amtrak hoosier state, will be led by coach is empty! Show your state amtrak hoosier train control equipment is the hoosier state schedule for the issue to reflect any extra legroom or of the prices directly from. Enforcement of amtrak state schedule changes made this is your home about the hoosier independent journalism today to. Thing that amtrak train running regularly as freight volumes increase the governors support.
[Show full text]
Improving Intercity Passenger Rail Service in the United States
Improving Intercity Passenger Rail Service in the United States Updated February 8, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45783 SUMMARY R45783 Improving Intercity Passenger Rail Service February 8, 2021 in the United States Ben Goldman The federal government has been involved in preserving and improving passenger rail service Analyst in Transportation since 1970, when the bankruptcies of several major railroads threatened the continuance of Policy passenger trains. Congress responded by creating Amtrak—officially, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation—to preserve a basic level of intercity passenger rail service, while relieving private railroad companies of the obligation to maintain a business that had lost money for decades. In the years since, the federal government has funded Amtrak and, in recent years, has funded passenger-rail efforts of varying size and complexity through grants, loans, and tax subsidies. Most recently, Congress has attempted to manage the effects on passenger rail brought about by the sudden drop in travel demand due to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Amtrak’s ridership and revenue growth trends were suddenly upended, and passenger rail service in many markets was either reduced or suspended. Efforts to improve intercity passenger rail can be broadly grouped into two categories: incremental improvement of existing services operated by Amtrak and implementation of new rail service where none currently exists. Efforts have been focused on identifying corridors where passenger rail travel times would be competitive with driving or flying (generally less than 500 miles long) and where population density and intercity travel demand create favorable conditions for rail service.
[Show full text]
State of Indiana
Amtrak Fact Sheet State of Indiana Amtrak Service & Ridership Amtrak operates four long-distance trains through Indiana: · The Capitol Limited (daily Chicago-Waterloo-Cleveland-Pittsburgh-Washington, D.C.) · The Cardinal (tri-weekly Chicago-Indianapolis-Cincinnati-New York · The Lake Shore Limited (daily Chicago-South Bend-Cleveland-Buffalo-Boston/New York) · The Three Rivers (daily Chicago-Nappanee-New York) Amtrak also operates one short distance train, the Hoosier State (quad-weekly Indianapolis-Chicago), which operates on the days that the Cardinal does not. Additionally, the Michigan corridor services from Chicago operate through Indiana via Hammond-Whiting and Michigan City, Indiana. During FY03 Amtrak served the following Indiana locations: City Ridership Connersville 472 Crawfordsville 1,950 Dyer 838 Elkhart 6,062 Hammond-Whiting 10,890 Indianapolis 15,816 *Jeffersonville 578 Lafayette 7,772 Michigan City 1,606 Nappanee 3,638 Rensselaer 776 South Bend 15,603 Waterloo 15,551 Total Indiana Ridership: 81,552 *Service to Jeffersonville was discontinued in July 2003, when the Kentucky Cardinal (Chicago- Louisville) was discontinued. Amtrak Government Affairs: December 2003 Procurement/Contracts Amtrak expended $11,543,835 for goods and services in Indiana in FY03. Most of this money was spent in the following locations: City Amount Beech Grove $1,374,677 Indianapolis $6,733,874 Employment As of December 2003, Amtrak employed 964 Indiana residents. Total wages of Amtrak employees living in Indiana were $29,839,690 in calendar year 2003. Amtrak Mayor’s Advisory Council Major Facilities Amtrak’s principal heavy maintenance facility is located in Beech Grove, just outside of Indianapolis. Here, approximately 650 employees (as of December 2003) rebuild Amtrak’s Superliner, Viewliner, and Horizon fleet, as well as P42 locomotives, are overhauled and rebuilt for use in service throughout the Amtrak system.
[Show full text]
Cardinal-Hoosier State-New York-Chicago-June92014
CARDINAL® JUNE 9, 2014 and HOOSIER STATE® Effective ® NEW YORK – and – CHICAGO Enjoy the journey. 1-800-USA-RAIL 1-800-USA-RAIL Call NEW YORK - WASHINGTON, DC CHARLOTTESVILLE - WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS CHARLESTON - CINCINNATI INDIANAPOLIS - CHICAGO and intermediate stations AMTRAK.COM AMTRAK.COM Visit NRPC Form P50–125M–6/9/14 Stock #02-3739 Schedules subject to change without notice. Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corp. National Railroad Passenger Corporation Washington Union Station, 60 Massachusetts Ave. N.E., Washington, DC 20002. CARDINAL and HOOSIER STATE Hoosier Hoosier CARDINAL and HOOSIER STATE Cardinal Train Name Cardinal State State ROUTE MAP and SYMBOLS Cardinal® 851 51 Train Number 50 850 Hoosier State® Dp NYC Ar NYC SuTuWeFr SuMoWeFr y, WV A SuWeFr Normal Days of Operation WeFrSu Dyer, IN Lafayette,Indianapolis, IN Cincinnati, IN South OH Portsmouth/SouthHuntington,Montgomer WV Prince,Shore, KYWVAlderson,Clifton WV Forge,Charlottesville, VA Manassas, VAWashington, V Wilmington, DC Trenton, DE NJNew York, NY R s R s N Y R R , MD On Board Service Chicago, IL Ashland, KY Hinton, WV Staunton,Culpeper, VA VA Newark, NJ r l r l Rensselaer, IN Connersville,Maysville, I K Charleston,Thurmond, WV WV Alexandria,Baltimore VA Philadelphia, PA Crawfordsville, IN Read Down Mile Symbol Read Up White Sulphur Springs, WV 8l6 45A 0DpNEW YORK, NY (ET) ∑w- Ar l9 56P –Penn Station CHICCHICAGOCAGOO 8lR7 05A 10 Newark, NJ ∑w- lD9 35P NEWN W YORKYO K 8R7 42A 58 Trenton, NJ ∑w- D8 53P INDIANAPOLISNDIANDIANAPOANAPPOOL S 8lR8 15A 91 Philadelphia, PA–30th Street Sta.
[Show full text]