Nikopol Supplementary Information [EBRD

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nikopol Supplementary Information [EBRD DRAFT SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR NIKOPOL BIOMASS CHPP October 2009 Prepared for: and Enemona SA 150 Vitosha Street, bldg. 70, vh A, Ivan Vazov District, floor 2, apt.3 1 Balsha Street, bldg. 9, floor Ivan Vazov District 1408 Sofia 1408 Sofia Bulgaria Bulgaria Prepared by: Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp. 1120 Sanctuary Parkway, Suite 200 Alpharetta, Georgia 30022 USA Contract C18484/LUX-2008-12-16 Black & Veatch Project 042014.01.01 Supplementary Information for CHPP Nikopol EIA TITLE PAGE Project Title: Bulgaria: Nikopol Biomass Project - Environmental and Social Assessment Contract: Contract C18484/LUX-2008-12-16 Document Title: Supplementary Information for Environmental Impact Assessment for Nikopol Biomass CHPP Prepared by: Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp. Date Prepared: October 2009 Prepared by: Sarah Howard (straw), Mike Johnsen (GIS), Ajay Kasarabada (carbon emissions), Mary Matthews (PCDP), Ivan Maximov (management and monitoring plans), Jack Mozingo B&V Project Manager: Jack Mozingo CHPP Project Manager: Boris Petlov i Draft Supplementary Information for CHPP Nikopol EIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page..................................................................................................................................i Table of Contents..................................................................................................................... ii List of Tables........................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures ......................................................................................................................... iii 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 2.0 Evaluation of Straw Collection and Transportation Program........................................3 2.1 Overview of Straw Program ..................................................................................3 2.1.1 Straw collection ........................................................................................3 2.1.2 Transport from farm fields to storage areas .............................................6 2.1.3 Transport from storage areas to Nikopol CHPP .......................................8 2.1.4 Vehicle maintenance base camp..............................................................8 2.2 Potential impacts of the straw program and Belene base camp .........................10 2.2.1 Potential impacts from construction of straw storage areas, and base camp........................................................................................................10 2.2.2 Potential impacts from straw harvest......................................................13 2.2.3 Potential impacts from transporting straw from farms to storage areas .16 2.2.4 Potential impacts from transporting straw from storage areas to the Nikopol Biomass CHPP..........................................................................20 2.2.5 Potential impacts from construction and operation of base camp ..........21 2.2.6 Potential noise impacts of plant construction and operation ...................24 2.2.7 Summary of potential impacts ................................................................25 3.0 Overview of Potential Impacts on Natura 2000 Areas ...............................................27 3.1 Natura 2000 sites within the straw collection area ..............................................27 3.2 Potential impacts on Natura areas and mitigation measures..............................41 3.2.1 Impacts from harvest ..............................................................................41 3.2.2 Truck and tractor transport to straw storage areas and to CHPP...........43 4.0 Carbon Balance .........................................................................................................46 5.0 Public Consultation and Disclosure Plan ...................................................................48 5.1 Introduction .........................................................................................................48 5.2 Regulations and Requirements...........................................................................50 5.2.1 Bulgarian Public Consultation Requirements .........................................50 5.2.2 Public Consultation Requirements under the EU EIA Directive..............50 5.2.3 EBRD Public Consultation Requirements ..............................................50 5.3 Summary of Previous Public Consultation Activities...........................................51 5.4 Project Stakeholders ...........................................................................................51 5.4.1 Affected communities .............................................................................51 5.4.2 Nongovernmental organizations.............................................................54 5.4.3 Hired firms and workers..........................................................................54 5.4.4 Farmers ..................................................................................................54 5.4.5 Regional and national government.........................................................54 5.4.6 Municipal authorities...............................................................................55 5.5 Public Consultation and Disclosure Program......................................................56 5.5.1 Consultations with affected communities ...............................................57 5.5.2 Consultations with NGOs and civil society members .............................58 5.5.3 Consultations with workers.....................................................................58 5.5.4 Consultations with farmers .....................................................................58 5.5.5 Consultations with national and regional government authorities ..........59 5.5.6 Consultations with municipal authorities.................................................59 5.6 Timetable ............................................................................................................59 5.7 Resources and Responsibilities ..........................................................................60 5.8 Grievance Mechanism ........................................................................................61 5.8.1 Type of grievances .................................................................................61 5.8.2 Submission of grievance ........................................................................61 5.8.3 Grievance Resolution Process ...............................................................62 5.8.4 Confidentiality and Anonymity ................................................................63 ii Draft Supplementary Information for CHPP Nikopol EIA 5.9 Monitoring and Reporting....................................................................................63 5.10 Management Functions.....................................................................................64 6.0 Environmental and Social Management and Monitoring Plans..................................66 6.1 Environmental and Social Management Plan .....................................................66 6.2 Environmental and Social Monitoring Plan .........................................................66 7.0 References Cited .......................................................................................................94 LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1 Regions represented within the straw collection area ......................................... 5 Table 2-2 Villages and towns within 25 kilometers of a straw storage area ........................ 7 Table 2-3 Air emissions by tractors during straw harvest.................................................. 14 Table 2-4 Annual worker income from straw harvest ........................................................ 16 Table 2-5 Air emissions by vehicles transporting straw from farms to storage areas........ 17 Table 2-6 Annual air emissions by vehicles transporting straw from storage areas to Nikopoll Biomass CHPP...................................................................... 20 Table 2-7 Air emissions by vehicles traveling to Belene vehicle maintenance facility....... 22 Table 2-8 Air emissions by tractors traveling to Belene maintenance facility.................... 23 Table 2-9 Summary of potential impacts ........................................................................... 25 Table 3-1 Natura 2000 sites within the straw collection area ............................................ 29 Table 3-2 Natura 2000 areas that include lands used for agriculture................................ 45 Table 4-1 Carbon emissions from straw program ............................................................. 47 Table 5-1 Communities within straw collection area ......................................................... 55 Table 5-2 Schedule for Nikopol CHPP EIA and public consultation.................................. 59 Table 6-1 Environmental and Social Management Plan for the Nikopol Biomass CHPP . 67 Table 6-2 Environmental and Social Monitoring Plan for Nikopol Biomass CHPP............ 87 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1 Location of proposed Nikopol Biomass CHPP and immediate vicinity................ 2 Figure 2-1 Location of Nikopol Biomass CHPP, straw storage areas, and base camp within the straw collection area........................................................
Recommended publications
  • Draft Management Plan Persina Nature Park
    Draft Management Plan Persina Nature Park October 2006 Abbreviations AF Agricultural Fund BAS Bulgarian Academy of Science BD Basin Directorate BDA Biodiversity Act (Bulgaria) BGN Bulgarian Leva BSPB Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds CBD Convention on Conservation of Biological Diversity CC Consultative Council CHH Cultural Historical Heritage CITES Convention on International Trade of Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna CMS Conservation Management System CoM Council of Ministers dka Decares (1,000m2) EA Environmental assessment EAFA Executive Agency for Fishing and Aquaculture EEA Environmental Executive Agency EEC European Economic Community EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMEPA Enterprise for management of environmental protection activities ESE Ecologically sustainable enterprise EU European Union EUNIS European Nature Information System FF Forestry Fund FMS Forest management section GEF Global Environment Facility GIS Geographic Information System ha Hectare IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources km Kilometre l Litre LAG Local Action Group m Metre m/s Metres per second m2 Square metre m3 Cubic metre MAF Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry MDC Main drainage canal MoEW Ministry of Environment and Waters MoF Ministry of Finance MP Management Plan MRDPW Ministry of Regional Development and Public Works MWH Montgomery Watson Hauser m/s Metres per second NFB National Forestry Board NGO Non Governmental Organisation NIMH National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology NP Nature
    [Show full text]
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • Forum Process: Program Data
    FORUM PROCESS PROGRAM DATA PROGRAM DATA FP Program Data Cover.indd 1 11/20/07 3:03:17 AM FORUM PROCESS PUBLICATIONS 1 Donor’s Brief 2 Initiator’s Guide 3 Coordinator’s Guide 4 Moderator’s Guide 5 Forum Program Data 6 Forum Films Publisher: Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) 3003 Berne www.deza.ch Concept and coordination: Tulum Ltd. CH – 6987 Caslano www.tulum-consult.com The information in this brochure was provided by: Balkan Assist Association, Sofia Foundation for Local Government Reform, Sofia Agency for Socioeconomic Analyses, Sofia Industrieconsult, Sofia Business Center, Svishtov Znanie Association, Lovech NGO Club, Targovishte National Alliance for Volunteer Action, Plovdiv Regional Association of Municipalities “Trakya”, Stara Zagora Center for Sustainable Development of Teteven Municipality, Teteven Compilation and processing: Diana Andreeva and Irena Boneva Summary of the information: Maya Krasteva Introduction texts: Ginka Kapitanova, Iva Taralezhkova and Alex Melzer Layout: Mark Manion, Commusication Arts Orders: SDC Distribution Center Telephone: +41 31 322 44 12 Fax: +41 31 324 13 48 E-mail: [email protected] © SDC 2007 FP Program Data Cover.indd 2 11/20/07 3:03:17 AM FORUM PROCESS PROGRAM DATA FP Program Data.indd 1 11/20/07 8:00:27 AM CONTEnts PROGRAM OVERVIEW ...........................................7 THE SDC FORUM PROGRAM IN BULGARIA 2000–2007..................7 Summary Table 1 – Program Outcome and Volume ..................9 Summary Table 2 – Timetable
    [Show full text]
  • A G R O S T a T I S T I
    REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA Census of Agricultural Holdings in Bulgaria in 2010 Ministry of Agriculture and Food Ministry of Agriculture and With the financial support of Food the European Union No 215 – November 2012 2010 2020020052005 Agricultural Census in 2010 PLEVEN DISTRICT – main results General Characteristics of the District The Pleven District is situated in the North-West Region and is one of the 28 districts in Bulgaria (level A NUTS 3 of the common classification of territorial units for statistics of EU). The total area of the district is 4 653.3 sq. km, which represents 4.2% of the territory of G the country. The number of the settlements is 123, administered in 11 municipalities, the towns are 14, and the villages – 109. According to the population census R in 2011 the population in the district is 269 752 or 3.7% of the population in the country. The total utilized agricultural area (UAA) is 2 912 618.4 dca or 63% of O the territory of the district. STRUCTURE OF AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS The number of agricultural holdings in the Pleven District is 12 924 or 3.5% of the holdings in the country. The utilized S agricultural area (UAA) is 2 912 618.4 dca, allocated in 12 510 holdings. The average value of the UAA for the district is 232.8 dca or 130% above the average value for the country – 101.3 dca. The holdings that do not have UAA are 414. The share of UAA in the municipalities are as follows: 14% in Pleven Municipality, Dolna Mitropolia Municipality and T Nikopol Municipality, 10 % in Knezha Municipality, 9% in Cherven Bryag, 8 % in Gulyantsi Municipality, Levski Municipality and Dolni Dabnik Municipality, 6% in Iskar and Pordim Municipalities and 4% in Belene Municipality.
    [Show full text]
  • (EU) 2021/335 of 23 February 2021 Amending the Annex To
    25.2.2021 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Uni on L 66/5 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2021/335 of 23 February 2021 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1809 concerning certain protective measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States (notified under document C(2021) 1386) (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof, Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary checks applicable in intra-Union trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (2), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof, Having regard to Council Directive 2005/94/EC of 20 December 2005 on Community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC (3), and in particular Article 63(4) thereof, Whereas: (1) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1809 (4) was adopted following outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in holdings where poultry or other captive birds were kept in certain Member States and the establishment of protection and surveillance zones by those Member States in accordance with Council Directive 2005/94/EC. (2) Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1809 provides that the protection and surveillance zones established by the Member States listed in the Annex to that Implementing Decision, in accordance with Directive 2005/94/EC, are to comprise at least the areas listed as protection and surveillance zones in that Annex.
    [Show full text]
  • Model for Calculating Agri-Environment Payments in Natura 2000 Sites Introducing Nature Friendly Farming in Natura 2000 Sites in Bulgaria
    Model for Calculating Agri-environment Payments in Natura 2000 sites Introducing Nature Friendly Farming in Natura 2000 sites in Bulgaria Henk Zingstra (CDI; final edit) Warmelt Swart (DLG) Yulia Grigorova (WWF-Bulgaria) Final Report Wageningen UR Centre for Development Innovation (CDI) works on processes of innovation and change in the areas of secure and healthy food, adaptive agriculture, sustainable markets and ecosystem governance. It is an interdisciplinary and internationally focused unit of Wageningen University & Research centre within the Social Sciences Group. Through facilitating innovation, brokering knowledge and supporting capacity development, our group of 60 staff help to link Wageningen UR’s expertise to the global challenges of sustainable and equitable development. CDI works to inspire new forms of learning and collaboration between citizens, governments, businesses, NGOs and the scientific community. More information: www.cdi.wur.nl Innovation & Change Ecosystem Governance Adaptive Agriculture Sustainable Markets Secure & Healthy Food The project is funded by: Implemented by: Wageningen UR Centre for Development Innovation (NL) with partners: Centre for Environmental Information and Education (BG), Balkani Wildlife (BG), Bulgarian Biodiversity Foundation (BG), WWF-DCP (BG), Orbicon (DK) and DLG (NL). Model for Calculating Agri-environment Payments in Natura 2000 sites Introducing Nature Friendly Farming in Natura 2000 sites in Bulgaria Henk Zingstra (CDI; final edit) Warmelt Swart (DLG) Yulia Grigorova (WWF-Bulgaria)
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands Restoration and Pollution Reduction Project”
    FINAL REPORT DESIGN OF PROJECT MONITORING AND EVALUATION (M&E) SYSTEM FOR THE “WETLANDS RESTORATION AND POLLUTION REDUCTION PROJECT” July, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 1. GOAL AND OBJECTIVES 4 2. TASKS 4 3. SCOPE AND TECHNOLOGY OF WORK 5 I. MONITORING AND EVALUATION (M&E) SYSTEM FOR THE “WETLANDS RESTORATION AND POLLUTION REDUCTION PROJECT IN BULGARIA” 8 1. SYSTEM FOR MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF THE “WETLANDS RESTORATION AND POLLUTION REDUCTION PROJECT IN BULGARIA” 12 2. OBJECTIVES AND ACTION PLAN FOR THE “WETLANDS RESTORATION AND POLLUTION REDUCTION PROJECT” – PERSINA NATURE PARK 41 3. OBJECTIVES AND ACTION PLAN FOR THE “WETLANDS RESTORATION AND POLLUTION REDUCTION PROJECT” – KALIMOK-BRUSHLEN 67 II. STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS 92 1. IDENTIFICATION OF STAKEHOLDERS 92 2. ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS FROM THE SOCIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF STAKEHOLDERS 93 2.1. ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS FROM SURVEY OF THE POPULATION LIVING CLOSE TO THE WETLANDS 93 2.2. ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF THE SURVEY OF LAND OWNERS AND USERS 100 2.3. ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF THE SURVEY OF FISHERMEN 103 2.4. ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF THE SURVEY OF BUSINESSMEN 108 2.5. ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF THE SURVEY OF REPRESENTATIVES OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS 111 2.6. ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF THE SURVEY OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS 115 2.7. ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF THE SURVEY OF REPRESENTATIVES OF NON- GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS (NGOS) 116 2.8. ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF THE SURVEY OF SCHOOL DIRECTORS AND BIOLOGY TEACHERS 120 2.9. ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF THE SURVEY OF LOCAL MEDIA 123 2.10.
    [Show full text]
  • Bildiri (3.456Mb)
    2 I. ULUSLARARASI PLEVNE KAHRAMANI GAZİ OSMAN PAŞA VE DÖNEMİ (1833-1900) SEMPOZYUMU THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM OF THE HERO OF PLEVNA GAZİ OSMAN PAŞA AND HIS PERIOD (1833-1900) DÜZENLEME KURULU HONORARY BOARD OF SYMPOSIUM Vali [Governor Mr.] Mehmet GÜNDOĞDU Belediye Başkanı [Mayor Mr.] Nizamettin AYDIN Rektör [President of GOP University] Prof. Dr. Mümtaz Turgut TOPBAŞ KOORDİNATÖRLER COORDINATORS Vali Yardımcısı [Deputy-governor]Nevzat ERGUN. Belediye Başkan Yardımcısı [Deputy-mayor]Yunus YILMAZ Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Dekanı [Dean of Science and Arts Faculty] Prof. Dr. Yener OKATAN Tarih Bölümü Başkanı [Head of the History Department] Prof. Dr. Münir ATALAR ÜYELER MEMBERS Yrd. Doç. Dr. Abdullah İLGAZİ Dr. Mehmet MERCAN Dr. Mehmet BEŞİRLİ Dr. Ali AÇIKEL Dr. Songül ÇOLAK Arş. Gör. Abdurrahman SAĞIRLI Arş. Gör. Abdullah DÜNDAR GENEL SEKRETERYA GENERAL SECRETARY Emine YILDIZ / Belgin DORUK 3 I. ULUSLARARASI PLEVNE KAHRAMANI GAZİ OSMAN PAŞA VE DÖNEMİ (1833-1900) SEMPOZYUMU ___________________________________________________ Tokat Valiliği’nin Logosu Tokat Valisi Sayın Mehmet GÜNDOĞDU Tokat Belediyesi’nin Logosu Tokat Belediye Başkanı Sayın Nizamettin AYDIN ve Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi’nin Logosu Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Rektörü Sayın Prof. Dr. Mümtaz Turgut TOPBAŞ tarafından düzenlenmiştir. THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM OF THE HERO OF PLEVNA GAZİ OSMAN PAŞA AND HIS PERIOD (1833-1900) organized by The governorship of Tokat, the Municipality of Tokat and the University of Gaziosmanpaşa under the high Patronage of Governor Mr. Mehmet GÜNDOĞDU, Mayor Mr. Nizamettin AYDIN and President Prof. Dr. Mümtaz Turgut TOPBAŞ 4 I. ULUSLARARASI PLEVNE KAHRAMANI GAZİ OSMAN PAŞA VE DÖNEMİ (1833-1900) SEMPOZYUMU THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM OF THE HERO OF PLEVNA GAZİ OSMAN PAŞA AND HIS PERIOD (1833-1900) DÜZENLEME KURULU HONORARY BOARD OF SYMPOSIUM Vali [Governor Mr.] Mehmet GÜNDOĞDU Belediye Başkanı [Mayor Mr.] Nizamettin AYDIN Rektör [President of GOP University] Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • 1877-1878 Rus - Osmanli Savaşi'nda Propaganda: Avrupali Gazetecilerin Faaliyetleri Ve Rus Savaş Muhabiri Vasili I.N
    Hacettepe Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Türkiyat Araştırmaları Anabilim Dalı Türkiyat Araştırmaları Yüksek Lisans Programı 1877-1878 RUS - OSMANLI SAVAŞI'NDA PROPAGANDA: AVRUPALI GAZETECİLERİN FAALİYETLERİ VE RUS SAVAŞ MUHABİRİ VASİLİ İ.N. DANÇENKO’NUN SAVAŞ NOTLARI Aytaç YÜRÜKÇÜ Yüksek Lisans Tezi Ankara, 2018 1877-1878 RUS - OSMANLI SAVAŞI'NDA PROPAGANDA: AVRUPALI GAZETECİLERİN FAALİYETLERİ VE RUS SAVAŞ MUHABİRİ VASİLİ İ.N. DANÇENKO’NUN SAVAŞ NOTLARI Aytaç YÜRÜKÇÜ Hacettepe Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Türkiyat Araştırmaları Anabilim Dalı Türkiyat Araştırmaları Yüksek Lisans Programı Yüksek Lisans Tezi Ankara, 2018 x ÖZET YÜRÜKÇÜ, Aytaç. 1877-1878 Rus - Osmanlı Savaşı'nda Propaganda: Avrupalı Gazetecilerin Faaliyetleri ve Rus Savaş Muhabiri Vasili İ. N. Dançenko’nun Savaş Notları, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara, 2018. 1877-1878 Rus-Osmanlı Savaşı iki cephede, yaklaşık on bir ay süren, uluslararası dengeleri değiştiren ve etkileri günümüzde de devam eden evrensel neticeler doğuran bir savaştır. Osmanlı Devleti’ne getirdiği sosyo-kültürel, demografik, iktisadi ve siyasi bunalımın yanında, günümüzde üzerinde birçok devletin bulunduğu ve yaklaşık 60 milyon insanın yaşadığı Balkan topraklarının önemli bir kısmının ve Kafkasların yeniden şekillenmesine sebep olmuştur. Araştırmada savaşın nedenlerinden sonuçlarına kadar önemli bilgiler sunan, 1877-1878 Rus- Osmanlı Savaşı’nda zor şartlarda görev yapan ve çoğunluğu Osmanlı Devleti aleyhine propaganda yürüten Rus, İngiliz, Amerikan, Fransız, Alman, İtalyan, İsveçli, Avusturyalı ve Prusyalı gazeteciler ile bunların yazı, karikatür gönderdikleri gazeteler hakkında bilgiler verilmesi ve Balkan Cephesinde iki yıl boyunca muhabirlik yapan Rus muhabir Vasiliy İvanoviç Nemiroviç- Dançenko’nun “Savaş Yılı, 1877-78 Bir Rus Muhabirin Günlüğü” adlı birinci el kaynak niteliğindeki çalışmasından notlar, görüşler ve gözlemlerin paylaşılması, bu sayede yeni bilgiler çerçevesinde yorumlanması hedeflenmektedir.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Strategic Analysis As a Crucial Step for Local Development in Bulgarian Rural Areas
    REGIONAL STRATEGIC ANALYSIS AS A CRUCIAL STEP FOR LOCAL DEVELOPMENT IN BULGARIAN RURAL AREAS Eva Tsvetanova1 Abstract Regional strategic analysis seen at the level of local community assumes a global approach of all influence factors over current development on the one hand, but also the evolution of their impact in time. The purpose of this paper is to present the regional SWOT analysis procedure as an effective tool for the creation of a vital strategy for the local development and competitiveness of rural and peripheral communities in Bulgaria, but under certain preconditions. A territorial scope of the analysis is highlighted in order to show the implementation of sustainable development principles into the local planning process. The implementation procedure is then explained in order to facilitate local decision makers as to what should be changed or retained in a certain region. Furthermore, SWOT analysis in the Belene Municipality, a northern Bulgarian region, has proved to be an effective tool for evaluation of local distinctive features, identification of target markets, influence of the impact of global trends over local development, and drawing future action trajectories. Keywords: regional SWOT analysis, evaluation procedure, strategic planning, endogenous development JEL Classification: O21, R11, R58 Introduction Regional development strategies should be based on the sound assessment of endogenous potentials and on the revelation of the distinct local characteristics in order to gain competitive advantage on other regions. Each place has its own history and presents potential and future possibilities, which makes it impossible to implement common strategies in individual regions. It is still a challenge for Bulgaria to trace the impact of regional strategic analysis on rural and peripheral areas development.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineer Ilie Radu, in Order to Satisfy the City's Needs with Drinking Water from the Danube
    Project "The Path of Clay" Project code 15.2.1.003, funded by INTERREG V-A Romania-Bulgaria Program Introduction The Danube River has always been and will be a symbol of life. The great river separates and unites people, gives them drinking water, irrigation, gives them food and livelihood. It is an important transport artery - rafts, boats and ships since ancient times have connected not only its two banks, but also people who live and work in its fertile plain. The Danube divides and unites nations, cities and states. Downstream, before its fast-paced waters flow into the Black Sea, the water border is formed between two Balkan states - Bulgaria and Romania. The Lower Danube spills its lush waters along both shores to water the mother land feeding the two peoples - Bulgarian and Romanian. Tighten up your luggage and come with us on an exciting journey through the Path of Clay. We will have eight administrative districts located in two countries - Bulgaria and Romania, on both sides of the fertile Danube valley. Awaiting us a journey full of surprises and inspiration. In addition to beautiful scenery, you will be impressed: ancient ruins from the beginning of our millennium scattered in the two Roman provinces of Dacia and Moesia; medieval Orthodox churches and monasteries; remnants of fortress walls and destroyed palaces, who are witnesses of past majesty and glory. We will trace how the lives of our ancestors changed in different ages, we will touch their lifestyle, traditions and culture. But still there is the eternal land to which we are born and live.
    [Show full text]
  • New Tourist Route „The Path of the Clay”
    ”The Path of the Clay” New tourist project route „The Path of the Clay” Proj. Code 15.2.1.003, selected under the Interreg V-A Romania-Bulgaria Programme Project title: The Path of the Clay Editor: Alexis Project Association Filiasi Date of Publishing: October 2017 EUROPEAN UNION The content of this material does not necessarily represent EUROPEAN UNION the official position of the European Union. The content of this material does not necessarily represent the official position of the European Union. ASOCIATIA ALEXIS PROJECT FILIASI Filiaşi, Dolj county, code 205300, FILIASI, BALTA village, str. LUNCII 1 Phone 0763 498 010/ E-mail: [email protected] “The Path of the Clay” Project Proj. code 15.2.1.003, financed by the INTERREG V-A Romania-Bulgaria Programme A6. Elaborating the new tourist route “The Path of the Clay” -2016/7- 1 2 CHAPTER 01 - PRELIMINARY DATA The elaboration of a tourist route “The Path of the Clay” is a part of the implementation of “The Path of the Clay” project, in eligible project areas for project 15.2.1.003 (Romania - counties of Mehedinti, Dolj, Olt and Teleorman; Bulgaria - districts of Vidin, Montana, Vratsa and Pleven), with a view to creating a complex and full database, useful as a framework in promoting Romania-Bulgaria cross-border tourism. The very structure of the project has resulted in the determination of a niche in thematic or recreational tourism, i.e. the specificities of the production and use of clay in the tradition of human culture and civilisation of the Lower Danube Valley.
    [Show full text]