DOCSLIB.ORG

David Lloyd George, Memorandum: Suggestions As to the Military Position, 3 1 December 19 L4, in Gilbert, Ed., Pp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
David Lloyd George, Memorandum: Suggestions As to the Military Position, 3 1 December 19 L4, in Gilbert, Ed., Pp A WAR WITEIN A WAR: THE iMLI.i'ENCE OF BALKAN IRREDENTISM ON B-H STRATEGY IN SOUTE-EASTERN EUROPE, l9l4 - 1918 Sebastian Hubert Lukasik B.A. @Ions.). Simon Fraser University, 1998 THESIS sUBmIN PARTIAL FULmLLMENT OF THE REQUREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of History O Sebastian Hubert Lukasik 2000 SMON FRASER UNIVERSiTY Iune 2000 GU rights remed. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, witbout pemlllussionof ihe author uisIm and Acquiaitiins et 7Bi iographic Senrices senrices biùliographiques The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence dowing the exclusive permettant à la National Liiof Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distniute or seii reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats, la fome de mimfiche/iiim, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des exûaits substantiels mybe printed or othhse de ceiie-ci ne doivent être imprimb reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son autorisation. ABSTRACT During the First World War, the military and diplomatic efforts of individual Balkan states were directed towacd the fulfillment of national goals that had remained essentially unchanged since their fomiulation in the 19th century. Predating many of the Great Power rivalries that lay at the heart of the First World War, these aims contributed to the Balkan states' perception of the conflict as yet another oppoctunity to attain the elusive goals of irredentism and "national unification," and endowed the war in South- Eastern Europe with the characteristics of a Third Balkan War - the last stage of the Balkan liberation struggles initiated in the early 1800s. These aspirations did not always coincide with the broad diplomatic and military objectives espoused by the respective alliance systems on whose side the nations of South-Eastern Europe fought in the course of the war. For these countries, the dl-encompassing strategic priorities of the principal belligerents could rarely cepresent anything more than an abstraction. Consequently, Balkan statesmen considered such designs meaningfûl only if they offered the possibility of advancing their own national policy goals. The aim of this thesis is to analyze the influence of this perception of the nature of the conflict on Britain's Balkan strategy. An anaiysis of this kind will serve as the bais for the argument that conventional interpretations of the factors that shaped Britain's overall strategy in the First World War cannot, by themselves, account for the course and conduct of British strategy in South-Eastern Europe. Instead, they must be supplemented with considerations of the strategic priorities of Britain's Balkan allies and enemies, and their impact on the policies that guided British strategy in the region dunng the Great war. This thesis is based on a synthesis of a variety of primary and secondq sources. The doçumentary foundations consist of materials contained in the British Documents on Foreign Affairs: Reuorts and Paoers from the Foreim Office Confidential Print. These are supplemented with a selection of unpublished documents, including the Conclusions and the Memoranda of the British Wu Cabinet for the time period between December 19 16 and September 1918. Lastly, a broad range of secondary sources, including mernoirs, published collections of private papers, and key monographs, has also been utiüzed. DEDICATION To my parents "Easyys myne booke to rede and telleth of moche fite, But then your easy rede is damned hard to wryte.... " - WiUiarn Napier, Histoy of theWu in the Peninsula and in the South of France: From the Year 1807 to the Year 18 14 The process of cesearching and writing this thesis has ben, for the most part, a lonely task. Nevertheless, its completion would have been difficult, if not impossible, without the kind assistance of many individuals. In the first order, 1would like to acknowledge the debt of gratitude 1owe to my gmduate supervisor, Professor Andre Gerolyrnatos. My guide and mentor for the past three years, he has ken a source of unflagging encouragement and practicai assistance far in excess of what a graduate student rnight customarily expect from a supervisor. To him, 1will be always grateful. Next, 1would like to thank Professor Martin Kitchen for reading my work and providing comments and suggestions for improvement. Likewise, 1wish to offer thanks to Professor Lenard Cohen for his willingness to act as my extemal examiner. 1am ais0 grateful to the Department of History at Simon Fraser University for providing the financiai support that has allowed me to finish this work. Many thanks, too, must go to the administrative staff of the Deportment, especialiy Mary Ann Pope and Susan MacIntosh, for patiendy enduring the endless barrage of questions to which 1subjected them. 1am equally thankful for the moral support 1received hmfellow students and fnends in the History graduate program. In particular, 1would like to extend my most sincere gratitude to Christian Nielson and Stefani Marciante, whose fciendship, kindness, and encouragement sustained me at ail times, but especialîy in the "darkest hours." Most importantiy, however, 1would like to thank my parents. It was they who, more than anybody else, had to bear the costs - both real and figurative -of my academic presumptions. They did so patientiy, untiringly, and without cornplaint or reptoacb, al the whiîe providing me with hop, encouragement and inspiration. Tt is only fitting, therefore, that this thesis should be dedicated to them. TABLE OF CONTENTS .. APPROVAL.. ........................................................................................ ii S.. ABSTRACT.. ..................................................................................... ..ri1 DEDICATION.. .................................................................................... iv ACKNOWCEDGEMENTS ..................................................................... ..v Introduction BRITISH STRATEGY IN SOUTB-EASTERN EUROPE DURING THE FIRST WORLD WAR: AN HISTORIOGRAPHICAL SURVEY. ............... L Chapter One FROM "CONTINENTAL COMMi'ITMEiïT" TO A PEFUHPERAL STRATEGY: BRITAIN TüRNS TO THE BALKANS, DECEMBER 19141JANUARY 1915.. ........................................................ ..8 Chapter Two THE BALKANS AT THE OUTBREAK OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR........... 17 Chapter Three THE DARDANELLES, GALLIPOLI, AM)THE FALL OF SERBU, 1915.. .... ..39 Chapter Four TEE ROMANIAN INTERVENTION,1916.,. ............................................ .67 Chapter Five TEE MACEDONIAN FRONT,1917 - 1918............................................... 103 Conclusion A WAR WITHIN A WAR ...................................................................... 132 BIBLIOGRAPHY... ............................................................................ 138 Introduction BRITISH STRATEGY IN SOUTH-EASTERNEUROPE DURING TEIE FlRST WORLD WAR: AN BISTORIOGRAPBICAL BACKGROUND Throughout the First World War, Great Britain maintained a substantial military presence in South-Eastem Europe. British and imperid troops first arrived in the region in early 1915, when units of the hastilysrganized Mediterranean Expeditionary Force landed on the Gallipoli Peninsula. At the the, a number of Britain's leading military and politicai figures believed that the diversion of some of the Entente's human and material resources from the Western Front to the Balkans might üigger a set of military and political developments that would bnng the war to an early and successful conclusion for the Allies. The failure of the Gallipoli expedition, combined with the unsuccessful Franco-British attempt to render military assistance to Serbia in the fall and winter of 1915, discredited the notion that military operations in peripheral theaters such as the Balkans offered the best prospects for the defeat of the Central Powers. After the twin fiasco of the Dardanelles and Salonika, the strategic focus of most British leaders turned to other, seemingly more promising theaters of operations. In conformity with their new strategic priorities, British leaders attempted to effect a complete, or at least a partial disengagement fmm the Balkans. Nevertheless, although the retention of a large military force in the Balkans had seemingly ceased to conform with Britain's strategic interests, British units remained in South-Eastern Europe for the duration of the war. Altogether, the sheer number of troops that Britain and its allies maintained in the region until 1918, combined with the intensity of the inter-Allied disputes conceming the military and diplornatic conduct of the conîlict in South-Eastern Europe, transformed the Balkans into one of the most important theaters of the Great War. The corpus of historical titerature pertaining to the higher direction of Britain's war effort hliy reffects the prominent mle that the Balkans occupied in Britain's strategic calculations during the war. While there is no single monograph devoted exclusively to Britain's Balkan strategy, victually al1 of the principal studies of Britain's overall strategy between 19 14 and 19 18 accord a conspicuaus place to the Balkans. In analyzhg the forces
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Romanian Foreign Policy (1878-1914)
    World Wide Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development WWJMRD 2017; 3(11): 69-74 www.wwjmrd.com International Journal Peer Reviewed Journal Romanian foreign policy (1878-1914) Refereed Journal Indexed Journal UGC Approved Journal Dragos Ionut ONESCU Impact Factor MJIF: 4.25 e-ISSN: 2454-6615 Abstract Prior to independence, Romania has conducted foreign policy actions aimed at achieving this Dragos Ionut ONESCU objective (see trade convention with Austria-Hungary in 1875) and after 1878 was sought to ensure Strasbourg University/Babes- Bolyai University Cluj- security through political alliances with neighboring countries and powers. One of the main foreign Napoca, Romania policy issues, with important consequences and the territorial integrity of the Romanian Principalities and then was the status of the Danube. In the present paper I analyzed the Romanian foreign policy between 1878 and 1914. Keywords: Romanian Foreign Policy, International Relations, Security, Foreign Policy Introduction The first time the issue is considered Danube is the Treaty of Bucharest between Russia and Turkey, signed on May 28, 1812, which ended the Russo-Turkish war took place between 1806 and 1812. The Clashes of interest between the major European powers were put on the agenda the need to solve the problem of freedom of navigation on international rivers and its consecration in an international act. Used the occasion to ensuring this was the Peace Congress in Vienna, met after the first abdication of Napoleon. The Final Act 1815 states in Articles 108-118, fundamental principles of river. Under Article 109, navigation on international rivers was free for all states without distinction between riparian and non-riparian states; is accurate but that freedom of navigation applies only to commercial navigation, not for the war.
    [Show full text]
  • Political, Diplomatic and Military Aspects of Romania's Participation in the First World War
    Volume XXI 2018 ISSUE no.2 MBNA Publishing House Constanta 2018 SBNA PAPER OPEN ACCESS Political, diplomatic and military aspects of romania's participation in the first world war To cite this article: M. Zidaru, Scientific Bulletin of Naval Academy, Vol. XXI 2018, pg. 202-212. Available online at www.anmb.ro ISSN: 2392-8956; ISSN-L: 1454-864X doi: 10.21279/1454-864X-18-I2-026 SBNA© 2018. This work is licensed under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License Political, diplomatic and military aspects of romania's participation in the first world war M. Zidaru1 1Romanian Society of Historian. Constanta Branch Abstract: Although linked to the Austro-Hungarian Empire by a secret alliance treaty in 1883, Romania chose to declare itself neutral at the outbreak of hostilities in July 1914, relying on the interpretation of the "casus foederis" clauses. The army was in 1914 -1915 completely unprepared for such a war, public opinion, although pro-Entente in most of it, was not ready for this kind of war, and Ion I. C. Bratianu was convinced that he had to obtain a written assurance from the Russian Empire in view of his father's unpleasant experience from 1877-1878. This article analyze the political and military decisions after Romania entry in Great War. Although linked to the Austro-Hungarian Empire by a secret alliance treaty in 1883, Romania chose to declare itself neutral at the outbreak of hostilities in July 1914, relying on the interpretation of the "casus foederis" clauses. In the south, Romania has three major strategic interests in this region: - defense of the long Danubian border and the land border between the Danube and the Black Sea; - the keep open of the Bosphorus and Dardanelles, through which 90% of the Romanian trade were made; - avoiding the isolation or political encirclement of Romania by keeping open the Thessaloniki-Nis- Danube communication, preventing its blocking as a result of local conflicts or taking over under strict control by one of the great powers in the region[1].
    [Show full text]
  • BULGARIA and HUNGARY in the FIRST WORLD WAR: a VIEW from the 21ST CENTURY 21St -Century Studies in Humanities
    BULGARIA AND HUNGARY IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR: A VIEW FROM THE 21ST CENTURY 21st -Century Studies in Humanities Editor: Pál Fodor Research Centre for the Humanities Budapest–Sofia, 2020 BULGARIA AND HUNGARY IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR: A VIEW FROM THE 21ST CENTURY Editors GÁBOR DEMETER CSABA KATONA PENKA PEYKOVSKA Research Centre for the Humanities Budapest–Sofia, 2020 Technical editor: Judit Lakatos Language editor: David Robert Evans Translated by: Jason Vincz, Bálint Radó, Péter Szőnyi, and Gábor Demeter Lectored by László Bíró (HAS RCH, senior research fellow) The volume was supported by theBulgarian–Hungarian History Commission and realized within the framework of the project entitled “Peripheries of Empires and Nation States in the 17th–20th Century Central and Southeast Europe. Power, Institutions, Society, Adaptation”. Supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences NKFI-EPR K 113004, East-Central European Nationalisms During the First World War NKFI FK 128 978 Knowledge, Lanscape, Nation and Empire ISBN: 978-963-416-198-1 (Institute of History – Research Center for the Humanities) ISBN: 978-954-2903-36-9 (Institute for Historical Studies – BAS) HU ISSN 2630-8827 Cover: “A Momentary View of Europe”. German caricature propaganda map, 1915. Published by the Research Centre for the Humanities Responsible editor: Pál Fodor Prepress preparation: Institute of History, RCH, Research Assistance Team Leader: Éva Kovács Cover design: Bence Marafkó Page layout: Bence Marafkó Printed in Hungary by Prime Rate Kft., Budapest CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................... 9 Zoltán Oszkár Szőts and Gábor Demeter THE CAUSES OF THE OUTBREAK OF WORLD WAR I AND THEIR REPRESENTATION IN SERBIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY .................................. 25 Krisztián Csaplár-Degovics ISTVÁN TISZA’S POLICY TOWARDS THE GERMAN ALLIANCE AND AGAINST GERMAN INFLUENCE IN THE YEARS OF THE GREAT WAR................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mărăști World War I Heritage in Vrancea and Bacău Counties Soveja
    NETWORLD - NETWORKING IN PRESERVING THE FIRST WORLD NETWORKING IN PRESERVING THE FIRST WORLD WAR In the city there are other heritage sites included in the list of historical Mărăști WAR MULTICULTURAL HERITAGE IN THE DANUBE COUNTRIES MULTICULTURAL HERITAGE monuments in Vrancea County, such as: the archaeological site of Pădureni - Mărăști is linked to one of the most important battles on the IN THE DANUBE COUNTRIES comprising a settlement and a necropolis from the Bronze Age, a Halstatt Romanian territory in the First World War. It was between July and August The NETWORLD project contributes to the Danube Transnational settlement and another from the Latène period. Marășești Train Station 1917 and it was an offensive operation of the Romanian and the Russian World War I heritage in (1872) is classified as an architectural monument. Programme objectives and priority area 2 (Environment and culture Vrancea and Bacău Counties Armies with the aim of encircle and destroy the 9th German Army. The responsible Danube region) by strengthening the joint and integrated Battle of Mărăști was very important for the military operations on the approaches in documenting, preserving, managing and promoting the ROMANIA joined the World War I on the side of the Allied powers Soveja Romanian front and contributed to raising the morale of the soldiers. cultural heritage in the Danube region. from 1916, after two years of neutrality. The highest priority was the union Soveja is located in Vrancea County in Soveja Depression of the Vrancea Reorganized and trained but also with the experience of the 1916 of Romania with Transylvania which had 3 mil Romanian people.
    [Show full text]
  • Joffre, Joseph Jacques Césaire | International Encyclopedia of The
    Version 1.0 | Last updated 02 March 2021 Joffre, Joseph Jacques Césaire By Mathieu Panoryia Joffre, Joseph Jacques Césaire French general and statesman Born 14 January 1852 in Rivesaltes, France Died 03 January 1931 in Paris, France Joseph Joffre was commander-in-chief of the French army at the beginning of the First World War, which was supposed to be short. He fought to stop German progression and maintain the war effort in France over time. Despite being idolized by the people of France, he was removed from his positions at the end of 1916 due to a mixed record of success. Table of Contents 1 A colonial officer of the French Republic 2 At the head of the Army (1911-1916) 2.1 From preparations for war to practice 2.2 A global vision of the conflict 2.3 French dissensions 3 Disgrace or apotheosis? 4 Selected Archives: Selected Bibliography Citation A colonial officer of the French Republic Born in Rivesaltes, southern France, Joseph Joffre (1852-1931) entered the prestigious École Polytechnique in 1869, the youngest student of his year. In 1870, the Franco-Prussian War interrupted his classes and he was called to command an artillery battery in Paris. He was, however, never involved in action. A year later, he refused to take part in the Commune. After the second siege of Paris, he went back to his classes. He was a brilliant student and after graduating joined the Engineer Corps, where he became a specialist in fortifications and railways. He helped build several forts in mainland France, before applying his expertise, with great success, during the French colonial expeditions in Taïwan, Tonkin, Mali, and Madagascar.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great War Began at the End of July 1914 with the Triple Entente
    ANZAC SURGEONS OF GALLIPOLI The Great War began at the end of July 1914 with the Triple Entente (Britain, France and Russia) aligned against the Triple Alliance (Germany, Austria- Hungary and Italy). By December, the Alliance powers had been joined by the Ottoman Turks; and in January 1915 the Russians, pressured by German and Turkish forces in the Caucasus, asked the British to open up another front. Hamilton second from right: There is nothing certain about war except that one side won’t win. AWM H10350 A naval campaign against Turkey was devised by the British The Turkish forces Secretary of State for War Lord Kitchener and the First Sea Lord, Winston Churchill. In 1913, Enver Pasha became Minister of War and de-facto Commander in Chief of the Turkish forces. He commanded It was intended that allied ships would destroy Turkish the Ottoman Army in 1914 when they were defeated by fortifications and open up the Straits of the Dardanelles, thus the Russians at the Battle of Sarikamiş and also forged the enabling the capture of Constantinople. alliance with Germany in 1914. In March 1915 he handed over control of the Ottoman 5th army to the German General Otto Liman von Sanders. It was intended that allied Von Sanders recognised the allies could not take Constantinople without a combined land and sea attack. ships would destroy Turkish In his account of the campaign, he commented on the small force of 60,000 men under his command but noted: The fortifications British gave me four weeks before their great landing.
    [Show full text]
  • Aberystwyth University Civilian Specialists At
    Aberystwyth University Civilian Specialists at War Phillips, Christopher DOI: 10.14296/420.9781909646926 Publication date: 2020 Citation for published version (APA): Phillips, C. (2020). Civilian Specialists at War: Britain's Transport Experts and the First World War. (New Historical Perspectives). University of London Press. https://doi.org/10.14296/420.9781909646926 Document License CC BY-NC-ND General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Aberystwyth Research Portal (the Institutional Repository) are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Aberystwyth Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Aberystwyth Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. tel: +44 1970 62 2400 email: [email protected] Download date: 07. Oct. 2021 Downloaded from the Humanities Digital Library http://www.humanities-digital-library.org Open Access books made available by the School of Advanced Study, University of London Press ***** Publication details: Civilian Specialists
    [Show full text]
  • Inheriting the Yugoslav Century: Art, History, and Generation
    Inheriting the Yugoslav Century: Art, History, and Generation by Ivana Bago Department of Art, Art History and Visual Studies Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Kristine Stiles, Supervisor ___________________________ Mark Hansen ___________________________ Fredric Jameson ___________________________ Branislav Jakovljević ___________________________ Neil McWilliam Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Art, Art History and Visual Studies in the Graduate School of Duke University 2018 ABSTRACT Inheriting the Yugoslav Century: Art, History, and Generation by Ivana Bago Department of Art, Art History and Visual Studies Duke University ___________________________ Kristine Stiles, Supervisor ___________________________ Mark Hansen ___________________________ Fredric Jameson ___________________________ Branislav Jakovljević ___________________________ Neil McWilliam An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Art, Art History and Visual Studies in the Graduate School of Duke University 2018 Copyright by Ivana Bago 2018 Abstract The dissertation examines the work contemporary artists, curators, and scholars who have, in the last two decades, addressed urgent political and economic questions by revisiting the legacies of the Yugoslav twentieth century: multinationalism, socialist self-management, non- alignment, and
    [Show full text]
  • Blood Ties: Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878
    BLOOD TIES BLOOD TIES Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 I˙pek Yosmaog˘lu Cornell University Press Ithaca & London Copyright © 2014 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. First published 2014 by Cornell University Press First printing, Cornell Paperbacks, 2014 Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Yosmaog˘lu, I˙pek, author. Blood ties : religion, violence,. and the politics of nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 / Ipek K. Yosmaog˘lu. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8014-5226-0 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-8014-7924-3 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Macedonia—History—1878–1912. 2. Nationalism—Macedonia—History. 3. Macedonian question. 4. Macedonia—Ethnic relations. 5. Ethnic conflict— Macedonia—History. 6. Political violence—Macedonia—History. I. Title. DR2215.Y67 2013 949.76′01—dc23 2013021661 Cornell University Press strives to use environmentally responsible suppliers and materials to the fullest extent possible in the publishing of its books. Such materials include vegetable-based, low-VOC inks and acid-free papers that are recycled, totally chlorine-free, or partly composed of nonwood fibers. For further information, visit our website at www.cornellpress.cornell.edu. Cloth printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Paperback printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 To Josh Contents Acknowledgments ix Note on Transliteration xiii Introduction 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Turks and Europe by Gaston Gaillard London: Thomas Murby & Co
    THE TURKS AND EUROPE BY GASTON GAILLARD LONDON: THOMAS MURBY & CO. 1 FLEET LANE, E.C. 1921 1 vi CONTENTS PAGES VI. THE TREATY WITH TURKEY: Mustafa Kemal’s Protest—Protests of Ahmed Riza and Galib Kemaly— Protest of the Indian Caliphate Delegation—Survey of the Treaty—The Turkish Press and the Treaty—Jafar Tayar at Adrianople—Operations of the Government Forces against the Nationalists—French Armistice in Cilicia—Mustafa Kemal’s Operations—Greek Operations in Asia Minor— The Ottoman Delegation’s Observations at the Peace Conference—The Allies’ Answer—Greek Operations in Thrace—The Ottoman Government decides to sign the Treaty—Italo-Greek Incident, and Protests of Armenia, Yugo-Slavia, and King Hussein—Signature of the Treaty – 169—271 VII. THE DISMEMBERMENT OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE: 1. The Turco-Armenian Question - 274—304 2. The Pan-Turanian and Pan-Arabian Movements: Origin of Pan-Turanism—The Turks and the Arabs—The Hejaz—The Emir Feisal—The Question of Syria—French Operations in Syria— Restoration of Greater Lebanon—The Arabian World and the Caliphate—The Part played by Islam - 304—356 VIII. THE MOSLEMS OF THE FORMER RUSSIAN EMPIRE AND TURKEY: The Republic of Northern Caucasus—Georgia and Azerbaïjan—The Bolshevists in the Republics of Caucasus and of the Transcaspian Isthmus—Armenians and Moslems - 357—369 IX. TURKEY AND THE SLAVS: Slavs versus Turks—Constantinople and Russia - 370—408 2 THE TURKS AND EUROPE I THE TURKS The peoples who speak the various Turkish dialects and who bear the generic name of Turcomans, or Turco-Tatars, are distributed over huge territories occupying nearly half of Asia and an important part of Eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Greek Economic and Military Mobilization of the 1909-1923 Period.1
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 20, ISSUE 1 Studies The Economic forces of victory versus those of defeat: An analysis of the Greek Economic and Military Mobilization of the 1 1909-1923 period. Dr. Ioannis-Dionysios Salavrakos (*) Introduction. The intellectual aspiration of the paper is to highlight the economic forces, which played an immense role in the wars in which Greece participated during the 1909-1923 period. These were four major conflicts: The two Balkan wars of 1912-1913 against the Ottoman Empire and Bulgaria; the First World War (1914-1918) and the Greek-Turkish war of 1919-1922. The tragic period started with Greek victories and ended with the greatest defeat of the modern Greek state. Although these conflicts were different, there is a clear nexus between them. In the Greek as well as the international bibliography, the majority of studies highlight the strategic, tactical, operational, diplomatic, psychological dimensions of the conflicts of the period, as well as, the personal motives of political and military leaders. Under this intellectual framework, the economic forces of the conflict are marginalized by most academics. The final conflict of the period is primarily known as the ‘Campaign of Asia-Minor’ in the Greek bibliography, whereas in the Turkish bibliography it is considered as ‘the Great Patriotic War.’ Thus in this article we aim to demonstrate that the conflicts of the period are connected and also that the Greek defeat 1 This article is dedicated to the memory of my beloved grandmother Stavroula Poulea Koutsikou (1921- 2019) who passed away. She had lived the Second World War and had told me many stories from that era.
    [Show full text]
  • Manifestopdf Cover2
    A Manifesto for the Book Sarah Bodman and Tom Sowden A Manifesto for the Book Sarah Bodman and Tom Sowden with an edited selection of interviews, essays and case studies from the project What will be the canon for the artist’s book in the 21st Century? 1 A Manifesto for the Book Published by Impact Press at The Centre for Fine Print Research University of the West of England, Bristol February 2010 Free download from: http://www.bookarts.uwe.ac.uk/canon.htm This publication is a result of a project funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council from March 2008 - February 2010: What will be the canon for the artist’s book in the 21st Century? The AHRC funds postgraduate training and research in the arts and humanities, from archaeology and English literature to design and dance. The quality and range of research supported not only provides social and cultural benefits but also contributes to the economic success of the UK. For further information on the AHRC, please see the website www.ahrc.ac.uk ISBN 978-1-906501-04-4 © 2010 Publication, Impact Press © 2010 Images, individual artists © 2010 Texts, individual authors Editors Sarah Bodman and Tom Sowden The views expressed within A Manifesto for the Book are not necessarily those of the editors or publisher. Impact Press, Centre for Fine Print Research UWE, Bristol School of Creative Arts Kennel Lodge Road, Bristol BS3 2JT United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 117 32 84915 Fax: +44 (0) 117 32 85865 www.bookarts.uwe.ac.uk [email protected] [email protected] 2 Contents Interview with Eriko Hirashima founder of LA LIBRERIA artists’ bookshop in Singapore 109 A Manifesto for the Book Sarah Bodman and Tom Sowden 5 Interview with John Risseeuw, proprietor of his own Cabbagehead Press and Director of ASU’s Pyracantha Interview with Radoslaw Nowakowski on publishing his own Press, Arizona State University, USA 113 books and artists’ books “non-describing the world” since the 70s in Dabrowa Dolna, Poland.
    [Show full text]