DOCSLIB.ORG

Bothnian Bay River Basin Management Plan 2016-2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bothnian Bay River Basin Management Plan 2016-2021 BOTHNIAN BAY WATER DISTRICT BOTHNIAN BAY RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2016-2021 English summary River Basin Management Plan 2016-2021 Bothnian Bay Water District – English summary Diary number: 537-9859-201 Issued by: County Administrative Board of Norrbotten Responsible unit: The Bothnian Bay Water District Authority Author: Swedish Water Authority of the Bothnian Bay Water District Cover photo: 2014©Andreas Broman Layout: Carina Nanker Production: Turbin AB Edition: available for download at www.vattenmyndigheterna.se PREFACE The water in Sweden and especially in its northern parts is often taken for granted, something that is in abundant quantities and maintains high quality. This picture is not correct, nor is it the case in other parts of the world where water, both in terms of quantity and quality, is the most explicit limitation of the conditions of life and thereby pervades all societies. Water management is an environmental and resource issue with many dimensions. Water is our most important nutriment, one of our most important resources and a habitat for many plants and animals. It is therefore natural that questions about how we handle water are closely associated with society at large. Whether we drink the water, use it as cooling water to produce electricity, fish, swim or enjoy the nature experience, we must all take responsibility. Water is not a commercial product like any other but, rather, a heritage which must be protected, defended and treated as such. Water management according to the EC Water Framework Directive is to achieve good water status in all groundwater, lakes, rivers and coastal waters. On December 16, 2016 an important step was taken towards better water in the Bothnian Bay water district. The water district board then decided on environmental quality standards, program of measures and mana- gement plan 2016-2021 for the district´s water bodies that comply with the manage- ment plan and program of measures 2009-2015. These documents underlie further work on securing, managing and improving the state of the district’s groundwater, lakes, rivers and coastal waters. Water management efforts involve municipalities and state authorities, but also require participation from other stakeholders such as individuals, companies and water councils. A challenge in coming years will be to ensure that water issues are more integrated into social planning and exercise of authority, as well as the rise awareness of water issues operators and individuals. Our goal is that environmental quality standards and program of measures will be effective tools for achieving set targets. Working with water issues in a coherent and well-thought-out way results in better water, good water environments and sustainable water resources. The time for better water is now! Sven-Erik Österberg County Governor at the County Administrative Board of Norrbotten Chairman of the water district board in the Bothnian Bay water district – I – ADOPTION OF THE RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN On 16 December 2016, the water district board of the Swedish Water Authority of the Bothnian Bay Water District decided on the management plan 2016-2021 for the Bothnia Bay water district (537-14223-2016). This according to chapter 5, section 1, of the Ordinance on Water Quality Management (SFS 2004:660). At the same time, the water district board decided, in accordance with chapter 3, section 1, of the Regulation (2004: 660), on environmental quality standards for surface and groundwater bodies in the Bothnian Bay water district. Environmental quality standards are prescribed by the County Administrative Board of Norrbotten (Water District Authority for the Bothnia Bay water district) regulations on quality requirements for water bodies in the Bothnian Bay water district (25 FS 2016: 32 A 26). The water district board also decided on the rogramme of measures 2016-2021 for the Bothnia bay water district. This according to Chapter 6, Section 1, of the Ordinance on Water Quality Management (SFS 2004:660). These decisions have been preceded by public consultation according chapter 2, section 4, the Ordinance on Water Quality Management (SFS 2004:660). READING INSTRUCTIONS This report is a summary of the river basin management plan for the Bothnian Bay water district 2016-2021 which describes the water management work in the district. The plan has five parts that includes a report on state, pressures and impacts on wa- ter bodies, surface and groundwater, in the district. It also describes set targets, en- vironmental quality standards, and the environmental monitoring forming the basis for assessments. The management plan also includes the programme of measures for the Bothnian Bay water district for the period 2016-2021, a scenario illustrating what socio-economic consequences of the programme of measures there may be, and a view of what may be ahead and may need to be carried out during the water manage- ment cycle from 2016 and on. The five parts are: 1. Introduction to the river basin management plan 2. The management plan 2009-2015 3. The monitoring program 2009-2015 4. The programme of measures 2016-2021 5. The management plan 2016-2021. The management plan of the Swedish Water Authority of the Bothnian Bay Water District also includes the County Administrative Board’s regulations on environme- ntal quality standards for water and a number of annexes. For more information, visit our website www.vattenmyndigheterna.se – II – Register of contents 1 Water – an indispensable resource ................................................. 1 1.1 There is constantly more to be learned .....................................................................1 1.2 The measures must be taken now ............................................................................2 1.3 Social development is dependent on clean water .....................................................3 1.4 The time for better water is now! ..............................................................................4 2 Water management framework in Sweden .................................... 5 2.1 The water district board decides ...............................................................................6 2.2 The water district authorities coordinate work ..........................................................7 2.3 Parliament and the government legislate, control and allocate funds .......................7 2.4 State authorities have responsibility for different parts ............................................8 2.5 The municipalities have several different roles .........................................................8 2.6 Cooperation ...............................................................................................................8 2.6.1 Water councils are the local connection ........................................................................... 9 2.6.2 Other stakeholders ............................................................................................................ 9 2.7 The instruments of water management ..................................................................10 2.7.1 River Basin Management plan .........................................................................................10 2.7.2 Environmental quality standards ......................................................................................11 2.7.3 Programme of Measures ..................................................................................................11 3 Bothnian Bay water district ........................................................... 13 3.1 The status of the water ...........................................................................................15 3.1.1 Monitoring of water in the district ...................................................................................16 3.2 Environmental challenges in the Bothnian Bay water district .................................18 4 Measures for better water ........................................................... 20 4.1 Programme of measures .........................................................................................20 4.2 Issues to be addressed in the water district ............................................................36 4.2.1 Physical changes .............................................................................................................36 4.2.2 Environmental contaminants............................................................................................36 4.2.3 Eutrophication ..................................................................................................................37 4.2.4 Acidification .....................................................................................................................37 4.2.5 Invasive species ...............................................................................................................38 4.2.6 Changed groundwater levels............................................................................................38 4.2.7 Chloride in groundwater ...................................................................................................38 4.2.8 Inadequate protection of drinking water ..........................................................................39 4.2.9 Protected areas ................................................................................................................39 4.2.10 Other problems and accidents .........................................................................................39
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ORNIS SVECICA Vol 18, No 1, 2008 Sveriges Ornitologiska Förening Stenhusa Gård 380 62 Mörbylånga Ornis Svecica Vol 18 No 1 2008 ORNIS SVECICA Vol 18, No 1, 2008
    POSTTIDNING 2008 No 1, 18, Vol ORNIS SVECICA Sveriges Ornitologiska Förening Stenhusa gård 380 62 Mörbylånga Ornis Svecica Vol 18 No 1 2008 ORNIS SVECICA Vol 18, No 1, 2008 Innehåll – Contents 3 OTTVALL, R. Ortolansparvens Emberiza hortulana förekomst och habitatval i Sverige. GREEN, M. Distribution and habitat choice of the Ortolan Bunting Emberiza hortulana in Sweden. LINDSTRÖM, Å. SVENSSON, S. ESSEEN, P.-A. MARKLUND, L. 17 ARHEIMER, O. Breeding performance of the Fieldfare Turdus pilaris in the subalpine birch zone SVENSSON, S. in southern Lapland: a 20 year study. Björktrastens Turdus pilaris häckning i den subalpina björkzonen i södra Lappland: en 20-årig studie. 45 SKYLLBERG, U. Spring staging of Taiga Bean Goose Anser f. fabalis in southern Sweden 2007 – TJERNBERG, M. estimate of the size of populations using the western and central flyways. Vårrastning av taigasädgås Anser f. fabalis i södra Sverige 2007 – uppskattning av storleken på populationer som nyttjar det västra och centrala flyttstråket. 52 NILSSON, J.-E. Resultat av 20 års holkstudier – främst rörande svartvit flugsnappare Ficedula hypoleuca. A 20-year study of a nest-box breeding bird population with special regard to the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Korta rapporter – Shot communications 65 HEDENSTRÖM, L. Häckning av svarthakedopping Popiceps auritus i Östergötlands ytterskärgård 2007. Breeding record of Horned Grebe Popiceps auritus in the outer archipelago of Östergötland in 2007. Grahns Tryckeri AB, Lund 2008 ORNIS SVECICA ISSN 1102-6812 Instruktioner till författarna Instructions to authors Ornis Svecica is indexed in BIOSIS, CSA/Ecology Abstracts, Zoological Record, and Elsevier Bibliographical Databases. Free access to abstracts in www.eurobirding.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Bothnian Bay Coastal Meadows Management Project
    EUROPEAN LANDSCAPE CONVENTION LANDSCAPE AWARD OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE 7th Session – 2020-2021 APPLICATION FORM Council of Europe – European Landscape Convention Presentation The European Landscape Convention aims to promote the protection, management and planning of landscapes and to bring together European co-operation in this field. It is the first international treaty exclusively devoted to all dimensions of European landscape. Taking into account the landscape, natural and cultural values of the territory, it contributes to promoting the quality of life and well-being of Europeans. The Resolution on the Rules governing the Landscape Award of the Council of Europe, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 20 February 2008 at the 1018th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies, draws attention to the fact that Article 11 of the Convention institutes the Landscape Award of the Council of Europe and that it is in keeping with the work carried out by the Council of Europe concerning human rights, democracy and sustainable development. It effectively promotes the territorial dimension of human rights and democracy by acknowledging the importance of measures taken to improve the landscape for people’s living conditions. Opened to the Parties to the Convention, the Award is intended to raise civil society’s awareness of the value of landscapes, of their role and of changes to them. Its objective is to reward exemplary practical initiatives aimed at successful landscape quality objectives on the territories of the Parties to the Convention. The Award is conferred every two years and the files presenting applications must reach the Secretariat General of the Council of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Communities of Baltic Coastal Fish Executive Summary: Assessment of Coastal fi Sh in the Baltic Sea
    Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings No. 103 B Changing Communities of Baltic Coastal Fish Executive summary: Assessment of coastal fi sh in the Baltic Sea Helsinki Commission Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings No. 103 B Changing Communities of Baltic Coastal Fish Executive summary: Assessment of coastal fi sh in the Baltic Sea Helsinki Commission Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission Editor: Janet Pawlak Authors: Kaj Ådjers (Co-ordination Organ for Baltic Reference Areas) Jan Andersson (Swedish Board of Fisheries) Magnus Appelberg (Swedish Board of Fisheries) Redik Eschbaum (Estonian Marine Institute) Ronald Fricke (State Museum of Natural History, Stuttgart, Germany) Antti Lappalainen (Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute), Atis Minde (Latvian Fish Resources Agency) Henn Ojaveer (Estonian Marine Institute) Wojciech Pelczarski (Sea Fisheries Institute, Poland) Rimantas Repečka (Institute of Ecology, Lithuania). Photographers: Visa Hietalahti p. cover, 7 top, 8 bottom Johnny Jensen p. 3 top, 3 bottom, 4 middle, 4 bottom, 5 top, 8 top, 9 top, 9 bottom Lauri Urho p. 4 top, 5 bottom Juhani Vaittinen p. 7 bottom Markku Varjo / LKA p. 10 top For bibliographic purposes this document should be cited as: HELCOM, 2006 Changing Communities of Baltic Coastal Fish Executive summary: Assessment of coastal fi sh in the Baltic Sea Balt. Sea Environ. Proc. No. 103 B Information included in this publication or extracts thereof is free for citing on the condition that the complete reference of the publication is given as stated above Copyright 2006 by the Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission - Helsinki Commission - Design and layout: Bitdesign, Vantaa, Finland Printed by: Erweko Painotuote Oy, Finland ISSN 0357-2994 Coastal fi sh – a combination of freshwater and marine species Coastal fish communities are important components of Baltic Sea ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Forecasting Environmental Responses to Restoration of Rivers Used As Log Floatways: an Interdisciplinary Challenge
    Ecosystems (2005) 8: 779–800 DOI: 10.1007/s10021-005-0030-9 Forecasting Environmental Responses to Restoration of Rivers Used as Log Floatways: An Interdisciplinary Challenge Christer Nilsson,1* Fabio Lepori,2 Bjo¨rn Malmqvist,2 Erik To¨rnlund,1 Niclas Hjerdt,1 James M. Helfield,1 Daniel Palm,3 Johan O¨ stergren,3 Roland Jansson,1 Eva Bra¨nna¨s,3 and Hans Lundqvist3 1Landscape Ecology Group, Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umea˚ University, SE-901 87 Umea˚ , Sweden; 2Stream Ecology Group, Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umea˚ University, SE-901 87 Umea˚ , Sweden; 3Department of Aquaculture, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-901 83 Umea˚ , Sweden ABSTRACT Log floating in the 19th to mid 20th centuries has interactions and increasing the retention capacity profoundly changed the environmental conditions of water, sediment, organic matter and nutrients. in many northern river systems of the world. The geomorphic and hydraulic/hydrologic altera- Regulation of flow by dams, straightening and tions are supposed to favor production, diversity, narrowing of channels by various piers and wing migration and reproduction of riparian and aquatic dams, and homogenization of bed structure are organisms. The response rates are likely to vary some of the major impacts. As a result, the condi- according to the types of processes and organisms. tions for many riverine organisms have been al- Some habitat components, such as beds of very tered. Removing physical constructions and large boulders and bedrock outcrops, and avail- returning boulders to the channels can potentially ability of sediment and large woody debris are be- restore conditions for these organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of National and International River Basin Districts Version 29 October 2012
    Map of National and International River Basin Districts Version 29 October 2012 -30° W -20° W -10° W 0° 10° E 20° E 30° E 40° E 50° E 60° E Azores (PT) k ar FI nm in Teno, F RU Atlantic Ocean NO NO Naatamojoki, s 0 100 m FI Paatsjoki ro km T T or T R ne o i r ve n Madeira (PT) r i Madeira (PT) FI o K e m i j o k i WHITE n j SEA o RU k FI d i n a l Atlantic Ocean 60° N d r Bothnian Bay NORWEGIAN o 0 100 N SE Oulujoki SEA km NO FI a Canaries (ES) i Canaries (ES) N g 1. La Palma n a l 2. El Hierro NO h 1 7 Moere NO e t 4 60° N d 3. La Gomera A o A K 5 n G and r o B u K V u o k s i 4. Tenerife e B c k 6 h l o e f y 2 3 Romsdal f o i m r Bothnian t p m o FI 5. Gran Canaria E h T o e f i n a j l F o 6. Fuertaventura Atlantic Sea i a e f a i k g n n i RU l n o j l - 7. Lanzarote 0 100 Ocean o a C Sogn u S S k n km e e i- d and G a a Glomma SE - O Fjordane Guadeloupe (FR) NO d Guadeloupe (FR) NO lan in f F Hordaland f o ul Caribbean age West G ass C E Sea e P Bay t Aland a up k North West s lo a t de a Islands ua r g Baltic Estonia EE E G I r e s t e t t o 0 100 g Agder a EE n km a i T K k Gauja a Rogaland ak r S d LV er n Martinique (FR) Scotland ag K LV D RU Martinique (FR) k a a South LV RU N S V tt e LV a e Baltic Neagh g n u a SE t Lielupe g t a a North Bann BALTIC LT v Caribbean A NORTH SEA LT BY a Western IE Jutland SEA LT Sea Solway and N LT L Swieza UK UK North- Funen e Tweet d Zealand m 0 10 North s umbria RU u Western IE e Bornholm Jarft a km IE IE Vidaa-Krusaa ly n W RU T n Eastern o a o g PL Eastern h DK Schlei/Trave e s 50° N n
    [Show full text]
  • Marine and Coastal Biodiversity: Draft Summary Report on the Description of Areas Meeting the Scientific Criteria for Ecological
    CBD Distr. GENERAL CBD/SBSTTA/22/7/Add.1 3 April 2018 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH SUBSIDIARY BODY ON SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVICE Twenty-second meeting Montreal, Canada, 2-7 July 2018 Item 8 of the provisional agenda* MARINE AND COASTAL BIODIVERSITY DRAFT SUMMARY REPORT ON THE DESCRIPTION OF AREAS MEETING THE SCIENTIFIC CRITERIA FOR ECOLOGICALLY OR BIOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT MARINE AREAS Note by the Executive Secretary Addendum BACKGROUND 1. Pursuant to decision X/29, paragraph 36, decision XI/17, paragraph 12, decision XII/22, paragraph 6 and decision XIII/12, paragraph 8, the following two additional regional workshops were convened by the Executive Secretary of the Convention on Biological Diversity: (a) Black Sea and Caspian Sea (Baku, 24 to 29 April 2017);1 (b) Baltic Sea (Helsinki, 19 to 24 February 2018).2 2. The description of marine areas meeting the criteria for ecologically or biologically significant marine areas does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Nor does it have economic or legal implications; it is strictly a scientific and technical exercise. 3. Pursuant to decision XI/17, paragraph 12, summaries of the results of these regional workshops are provided in tables 1 and 2 below, respectively, while full descriptions of how the areas meet the criteria for ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (EBSAs) are provided in the annexes to the respective reports of the workshops. * CBD/SBSTTA/22/1/Add.1. 1 Report contained in CBD/EBSA/WS/2017/1/3.
    [Show full text]
  • International Council for the Exploration of the Sea FINLAND J. Lassig Institute of Marine Research C. H. 1982/L: L/Corr. Admini
    \ International Council for C. H. 1982/L: l/Corr. the Exploration of the Sea Administrative Report Addendum 'BiologicalOceanography Committee FINLAND 6/0 J. Lassig Institute of Marine Research Phytoplankton, primary production, chlorophyll a and related parameters were studied every second week (twice during the ice period) at one station in the western part of the Gulf of Finland and at 15 stations in the entire Baltic Sea as stipula­ ted in theBaltic Monitoring Programme (Helsinki:Commission). Zooplankton was sampled (Hensen net) three times a month (once during the ice period) at two coastal stations in the Gulf of Finland, one station in the Archipelago Sea and one in the Bothnian Bay. Zooplankton was sampled (WP-2 net) at 26 stations in the entire Baltic Sea according to the Baltic Monitoring Programme·, I Benthic macrofauna communities were studied in the deep areas of the Baltic Sea. The stations of the Baltic Monitoring Pr~gramme were included in the survey. The produciton and decomposition of organie matter in the pela­ gial were studied in the Gulf of Finland in eooperation with Tvärminne Zoologieal Station of the University of Helsinki. Institute of Radiation Proteetion, Helsinki Benthos studies were carried out in the vieinity of two nuclear power plants, one in the Gulf of Finland and one in the Bothnian Bay. SampIes have been taken twiee at 9 stations at each plant. Phytoplankton, .ehlorophyll a and primary produetion studies were performed onee or twiee a month during the ice-free period around both plants. National Board of Waters, Water Research Office, Helsinki The influence of industrial pollution on the composition of th~ benthic macrofauna was studied in 4 areas in the Gulf of Finland, in 4 areas in~ the Bothnian Sea and in 3 areas in the Bothnian Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Kingdom of Sweden
    Johan Maltesson A Visitor´s Factbook on the KINGDOM OF SWEDEN © Johan Maltesson Johan Maltesson A Visitor’s Factbook to the Kingdom of Sweden Helsingborg, Sweden 2017 Preface This little publication is a condensed facts guide to Sweden, foremost intended for visitors to Sweden, as well as for persons who are merely interested in learning more about this fascinating, multifacetted and sadly all too unknown country. This book’s main focus is thus on things that might interest a visitor. Included are: Basic facts about Sweden Society and politics Culture, sports and religion Languages Science and education Media Transportation Nature and geography, including an extensive taxonomic list of Swedish terrestrial vertebrate animals An overview of Sweden’s history Lists of Swedish monarchs, prime ministers and persons of interest The most common Swedish given names and surnames A small dictionary of common words and phrases, including a small pronounciation guide Brief individual overviews of all of the 21 administrative counties of Sweden … and more... Wishing You a pleasant journey! Some notes... National and county population numbers are as of December 31 2016. Political parties and government are as of April 2017. New elections are to be held in September 2018. City population number are as of December 31 2015, and denotes contiguous urban areas – without regard to administra- tive division. Sports teams listed are those participating in the highest league of their respective sport – for soccer as of the 2017 season and for ice hockey and handball as of the 2016-2017 season. The ”most common names” listed are as of December 31 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • 20020011.Pdf
    Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen 1144 PERSPECTIVE Geological and evolutionary underpinnings for the success of Ponto-Caspian species invasions in the Baltic Sea and North American Great Lakes David F. Reid and Marina I. Orlova1 Abstract: Between 1985 and 2000, ~70% of new species that invaded the North American Great Lakes were endemic to the Ponto-Caspian (Caspian, Azov, and Black seas) basins of eastern Europe. Sixteen Ponto-Caspian species were also established in the Baltic Sea as of 2000. Many Ponto-Caspian endemic species are characterized by wide environmental tolerances and high phenotypic variability. Ponto-Caspian fauna evolved over millions of years in a series of large lakes and seas with widely varying salinities and water levels and alternating periods of isolation and open connections between the Caspian Sea and Black Sea depressions and between these basins and the Mediterranean Basin and the World Ocean. These conditions probably resulted in selection of Ponto-Caspian endemic species for the broad environmental tolerances and euryhalinity many exhibit. Both the Baltic Sea and the Great Lakes are geologi- cally young and present much lower levels of endemism. The high tolerance of Ponto-Caspian fauna to varying environmental conditions, their ability to survive exposure to a range of salinities, and the similarity in environmental conditions available in the Baltic Sea and Great Lakes probably contribute to the invasion success of these species. Human activities have dramatically increased the opportunities for transport and introduction and have played a cata- lytic role. Résumé : Entre 1985 et 2000, environ 70 % des espèces qui ont envahi pour la première fois les Grands-Lacs d’Amérique du Nord étaient endémiques aux bassins versants de la région pontocaspienne de l’Europe de l’Est, soit ceux de la mer Caspienne, de la mer d’Azov et de la mer Noire.
    [Show full text]
  • Coccolithophores and Calcite Saturation State in the Baltic and Black Seas
    Biogeosciences, 5, 485–494, 2008 www.biogeosciences.net/5/485/2008/ Biogeosciences © Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Coccolithophores and calcite saturation state in the Baltic and Black Seas T. Tyrrell1, B. Schneider2, A. Charalampopoulou1, and U. Riebesell3 1National Oceanography Centre, Southampton University, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK 2Institut fur¨ Ostseeforschung Warnemunde,¨ Seestrasse 15, 18119 Rostock, Germany 3Leibniz-Institute of Marine Sciences, IFM-GEOMAR, Duesternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany Received: 25 September 2007 – Published in Biogeosciences Discuss.: 10 October 2007 Revised: 30 January 2008 – Accepted: 27 February 2008 – Published: 1 April 2008 Abstract. The Baltic and Black Seas are both brackish, that carbonate coccoliths (shells) (Merico et al., 2006). As far as is to say both have salinities intermediate between freshwa- inorganic precipitation and dissolution of calcium carbonate ter and seawater. The coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi is are concerned, the tendency for these two processes to take abundant in one, the Black Sea, but absent from the other, place is governed by the saturation state: the Baltic Sea. Here we present summertime coccolithophore = [ 2−] [ 2+] measurements confirming this difference, as well as data on CO3 . Ca /Ksp (1) the calcium carbonate saturation state of the Baltic Sea. We find that the Baltic Sea becomes undersaturated (or nearly with inorganic precipitation increasingly likely and/or rapid so) in winter, with respect to both the aragonite and calcite as increases further above 1.0, and dissolution increasingly likely and/or rapid as decreases further below 1.0. mineral forms of CaCO3. Data for the Black Sea are more limited, but it appears to remain strongly supersaturated year- If biogenic calcification were to be controlled in the same round.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Third Finnish-Swedish Seminar on the Gulf of Bothnia
    VESIENTUTKIMUSLAITOKSEN JULKAISUJA PUBLICATIONS OF THE WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE PENTTI KANGAS AND MIKAELA FORSSKAHL (eds.) PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD FINNISH-SWEDISH SEMINAR ON THE GULF OF BOTHNIA Pori, Finland, August 20—21, 1984 VESI- JA YMPÄRISTOHALLITUS — NATIONAL BOARD OF WATERS AND ENVIRONM ENT, FINLAND Helsinki 1986 Tekijät ovat vastuussa julkaisun sisällöstä, eikä siihen voida vedota vesi- ja ympäristöhallituksen virallisena kannanottona. The authors are responsible for the contents of the publication. It may not be referred to as the official view or policy of the National Board of Waters and Environment. ISBN 951-47-0881-4 ISSN 0355-0982 Helsinki 1987. Valtion painatuskeskus 3 CONTENTS Lauri Tarasti: Opening address 6 HYDROGRAPHY Stig Fonselius: The hydrography of the Gulf of Bothnia. Report from the hydrography group. 8 Cecilia Ambjörn: The water exchange between the Gulf of Bothnia and the Baltic proper as simulated by the meteorological conditions in a statistical model. 17 Hannu Grönvall & Simo Kalliosaari: The use of satellite pictures for mapping the ice conditions and surface temperatures in the Gulf of Bothnia. 19 Raimo Heikkilä: Recent sedimentation in the delta of the Kyrönjoki, Western Finland. 24 Folke Koroleff & Vappu Tervo: The concentration of iron in the waters of the Gulf of Bothnia during 1973—1984, with a note on other heavy metals in Baltic waters. 29 Matti Leppäranta & Pekka Alenius: Statistical features of the hydrography in the Gulf of Bothnia. 33 Kalervo Mäkelä: Variations in dry matter, phosphorus and organic carbon in two Bothnian Bay sediment cores in relation to hydraulic engineering works. 36 Heikki Pitkänen, Pentti Kangas, Petri Ekholm & Matti Perttilä: Surface distribution of total phosphorus and total nitrogen in the Finnish coastal waters in 1979—1983.
    [Show full text]
  • The Northern Bothnian Bay
    Template for Submission of Scientific Information to Describe Areas Meeting Scientific Criteria for Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas THE NORTHERN BOTHNIAN BAY Abstract The Bothnian Bay forms the northernmost part of the Baltic Sea. It is the most brackish part of the Baltic, greatly affected by the combined river discharge from most of the Finnish and Swedish Lapland. The sea area is shallow and the seabed consists mostly of sand. The area displays arctic conditions: in winter the whole area is covered with sea ice, which is important for the reproduction of the grey seal (Haliochoerus grypus) and a prerequisite nesting habitat for the ringed seal (Pusa hispida botnica). In summer the area is productive and due to the turbidity of the water the primary production is compressed to a narrow photic zone (between 1 to 5 meters). Due to the extreme brackish water the number of marine species is low, but at the same time the number of endemic and threatened species is high. It is an important reproduction area for coastal fish and an important gathering area for several anadromous fish species. River Tornionjoki, which discharges into the northern part of the area, is the most important spawning river for the Baltic population of the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), a vulnerable species in the Baltic Sea. Introduction The Northern Bothnian Bay is a large, shallow and tideless sea area with a seabed consisting mostly of sand and silt, forming the northernmost part of the Baltic Sea. The topography is a result of the last glaciation (10,000 BP) and the isostatic land uplift is still ongoing (ca.
    [Show full text]