DOCSLIB.ORG

Historical Log of Judicial Appointments 1959-Present Candidates Nominated Appointed 1959 - Supreme Court - 3 New Positions William V

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Historical Log of Judicial Appointments 1959-Present Candidates Nominated Appointed 1959 - Supreme Court - 3 New Positions William V Historical Log of Judicial Appointments 1959-Present Candidates Nominated Appointed 1959 - Supreme Court - 3 new positions William V. Boggess William V. Boggess John H. Dimond Robert Boochever Robert Boochever Walter Hodge J. Earl Cooper John H. Dimond Buell A. Nesbett** Edward V. Davis Walter Hodge* 1959 by Governor William Egan John H. Dimond M.E. Monagle John S. Hellenthal Buell A. Nesbett* Walter Hodge * nominated for Chief Justice Verne O. Martin M.E. Monagle Buell A. Nesbett Walter Sczudlo Thomas B. Stewart Meeting Date 7/16-17/1959 **appointed Chief Justice 1959 - Ketchikan/Juneau Superior - 2 new positions Floyd O. Davidson E.P. McCarron James von der Heydt Juneau James M. Fitzgerald Thomas B. Stewart Walter E. Walsh Ketchikan Verne O. Martin James von der Heydt 1959 by Governor William Egan E.P. McCarron Walter E. Walsh Thomas B. Stewart James von der Heydt Walter E. Walsh Meeting Date 10/12-13/1959 1959 - Nome Superior - new position James M. Fitzgerald Hubert A. Gilbert Hubert A. Gilbert Hubert A. Gilbert Verne O. Martin 1959 by Governor William Egan Verne O. Martin James von der Heydt Meeting Date 10/12-13/1959 1959 - Anchorage Superior - 3 new positions Harold J. Butcher Harold J. Butcher J. Earl Cooper Henry Camarot J. Earl Cooper Edward V. Davis J. Earl Cooper Ralph Ralph H. Cottis James M. Fitzgerald H. Cottis Roger Edward V. Davis 1959 by Governor William Egan Cremo Edward James M. Fitzgerald V. Davis James Stanley McCutcheon M. Fitzgerald Everett Ralph E. Moody W. Hepp Peter J. Kalamarides Verne O. Martin Stanley McCutcheon Ralph E. Moody Raymond Plummer William W. Renfrew Thomas B. Stewart James von der Heydt Meeting Date 10/12-13/1959 1959 - Fairbanks Superior - 2 new positions H.O. Arend H.O. Arend H.O. Arend William V. Boggess William V. Boggess Everett W. Hepp James M. Fitzgerald Everett W. Hepp 1959 by Governor William Egan Everett W. Hepp Warren A. Taylor Verne O. Martin James von der Heydt Warren A. Taylor Warren Wm. Taylor James von der Heydt Meeting Date 10/12-13/1959 Note: The Judicial Council has attempted to compile an accurate listing of applicants, nominees and appointees to judgeships since statehood. Please notify the Council if you know of changes or additions that should be made to this list. Alaska Judicial Council Historical Selection Log - 1 Historical Log of Judicial Appointments 1959-Present Candidates Nominated Appointed 1960 - Supreme Court - Justice Walter Hodge Judge H.O. Arend Judge H.O. Arend H.O. Arend William V. Boggess William V. Boggess 1960 by Governor William Egan Edward V. Davis M.E. Monagle Vern Forbes Verne O. Martin John Maude Robert McNealy M.E. Monagle Ralph E. Moody Warren A. Taylor Judge James von der Heydt Meeting Date 3/12-13/1960 1960 - Fairbanks Superior - H. O. Arend Henry Camarot Jay A. Rabinowitz Jay A. Rabinowitz Roger G. Connor Warren A. Taylor 1960 by Governor William Egan Verne O. Martin Jay A. Rabinowitz William H. Sanders Arthur D. Talbot Warren A. Taylor George M. Yeager Meeting Date 4/15/1960 1962 - Anchorage Superior - J. Earl Cooper Harold J. Butcher Clifford Groh Ralph E. Moody Clifford Groh Ralph E. Moody 1962 by Governor William Egan Dorothy A. Haaland Peter J. Kalamarides Ralph E. Moody William H. Sanders Meeting Date 3/17/1962 1963 - Anchorage Superior - new position Burton C. Biss Burton C. Biss Hubert A. Gilbert Wayne D. Caldenwood Judge Hubert A. Gilbert 1963 by Governor William Egan Judge Hubert A. Gilbert R. Everett Harris Judge Jay A. Rabinowitz James K. Tallman William Taylor Meeting Date 5/23-24/1963 1963 - Nome Superior - Hubert A. Gilbert Peter J. Kalamarides William H. Sanders William H. Sanders William H. Sanders L. Eugene Williams 1963 by Governor William Egan L. Eugene Williams George T. Yates George T. Yates Meeting Date 10/17-18/1963 1965 - Fairbanks Superior - Jay A. Rabinowitz Clyde C. Houston Eugene V. Miller Mary Warren Wm. Taylor Eugene V. Miller Alice Miller 1965 by Governor William Egan Mary Alice Miller Warren Wm. Taylor J.H. Shortell, Jr. Howard P. Staley Warren Wm. Taylor Meeting Date 1/7-8/1965 Alaska Judicial Council Historical Selection Log - 2 Historical Log of Judicial Appointments 1959-Present Candidates Nominated Appointed 1965 - Supreme Court - Justice H. O. Arend W.C. Arnold W.C. Arnold Jay A. Rabinowitz William V. Boggess William V. Boggess 2/21/65 by Governor William Egan Harold J. Butcher Judge Edward V. Davis Judge Edward V. Davis Judge Ralph E. Moody Vernon D. Forbes Judge Jay A. Rabinowitz Judge Ralph E. Moody Judge Jay A. Rabinowitz Arthur D. Talbot Meeting Date 1/7-9/1965 1966 - Juneau Superior - James A. von der Heydt Seaborn J. Buckalew, Jr. Thomas B. Stewart Thomas B. Stewart James R. Clouse, Jr. J. Gerald Williams 1966 by Governor Wm. A. Egan James E. Fisher Judge William H. Sanders Thomas B. Stewart J. Gerald Williams Meeting Date 11/9-10/1966 1967 - Anchorage Superior - Hubert A. Gilbert James R. Clouse, Jr. James R. Clouse, Jr. Eben H. Lewis Eben H. Lewis Eben H. Lewis 1967 by Governor Walter Hickel Robert N. Opland J. Gerald Williams Judge William H. Sanders J. Gerald Williams Meeting Date 6/12/1967 1967 - Anchorage Superior - new position Harris R. Bullerwell Harold J. Butcher Harold J. Butcher Harold J. Butcher James R. Clouse, Jr. 1967 by Governor Walter Hickel James R. Clouse, Jr. Duane K. Craske Dorothy A. Haaland Verne O. Martin Judge William H. Sanders Virgil D. Vochoska J. Gerald Williams L. Eugene Williams Meeting Date 6/1-2/1967 1967 - Ketchikan Superior - Walter E. Walsh Harris R. Bullerwell Duane K. Craske Hubert A. Gilbert Duane K. Craske Judge Hubert A. Gilbert 1967 by Governor Walter Hickel Benjamin T. Delahay, Jr. John M. Stern, Jr. Judge Hubert A. Gilbert Judge William H. Sanders Helen L. Simpson John M. Stern, Jr. Meeting Date 12/5/1967 1968 - Anchorage Superior - new position James R. Clouse, Jr. C.J. Occhipinti C.J. Occhipinti Lloyd R. Duggar Karl L. Walter, Jr. 1968 by Governor Walter Hickel Verne O. Martin C.J. Occhipinti Judge William H. Sanders Karl L. Walter, Jr. George M. Yeager Meeting Date 2/19-20/1968 Alaska Judicial Council Historical Selection Log - 3 Historical Log of Judicial Appointments 1959-Present Candidates Nominated Appointed 1968 - Supreme Court - 2 new positions Russell E. Arnett William V. Boggess George F. Boney William V. Boggess George F. Boney Roger G. Connor George F. Boney Charles J. Clasby 1968 by Governor Walter Hickel Judge Harold J. Butcher Roger G. Connor Warren C. Christianson Judge JamesFitzgerald Charles J. Clasby Roger G. Connor Judge Edward V. Davis Benjamin T. Delahay Judge James M. Fitzgerald Wendell P. Kay Judge Ralph E. Moody Robert A. Parrish Judge William H. Sanders James K. Tallman Meeting Date 10/15/1968 1968 - Juneau District - 2 new positions Hartley Crosby Hartley Crosby Hartley Crosby William J. Hurley, Jr. W. Bruce Monroe W. Bruce Monroe W. Bruce Monroe 1968 by Governor Walter Hickel Irwin Ravin Meeting Date 11/1/1968 1968 - Sitka District - new position Peter M. Page Peter M. Page Peter M. Page Irwin Ravin Meeting Date 11/1/1968 1968 by Governor Walter Hickel 1968 - Fairbanks District - 3 new positions Hugh Connelly Benjamin Hugh Connelly Hugh Connelly T. Delahay, Jr. William Mary Alice Miller Mary Alice Miller J. Hurley, Jr. William G. Richards Arthur Lyle Robson Elinor B. Levinson Arthur Lyle Robson 12/30/68 by Governor Walter Hickel Mary Alice Miller Irwin Ravin William G. Richards Arthur Lyle Robson Warren A. Taylor Meeting Date 11/1/1968 1968 - Nome District - new position Maurice Kelliher Maurice Kelliher Maurice Kelliher Meeting Date 11/1/1968 1968 by Governor Walter Hickel 1968 - Anchorage District - 5 new positions John R. Beard Joseph J. Brewer Joseph J. Brewer Joseph J. Brewer James A. Hanson James A. Hanson Richard B. Collins Paul B. Jones Paul B. Jones Keifer L. Gray Warren A. Tucker Warren A. Tucker James A. Hanson Dorothy D. Tyner William J. Hurley, Jr. Virgil D. Vochoska Dorothy D. Tyner Paul B. Jones L. Eugene Williams 1968 by Governor Walter Hickel Elinor B. Levinson John D. Mason Peter M. Page Nissel A. Rose Warren A. Tucker Dorothy D. Tyner Virgil D. Vochoska L. Eugene Williams Robert K. Yandell Meeting Date 11/1/1968 Alaska Judicial Council Historical Selection Log - 4 Historical Log of Judicial Appointments 1959-Present Candidates Nominated Appointed 1968 - Ketchikan District - new position Keifer L. Gray Henry C. Keene, Jr. Henry C. Keene, Jr. William J. Hurley, Jr. 1968 by Governor Walter Hickel Henry C. Keene, Jr. Irwin Ravin Meeting Date 11/1/1968 1968 - Bethel District - new position Nora Guinn Nora Guinn Nora Guinn 1968 by Governor Walter Meeting Date 11/1/1968 Hickel Seat abolished 1976 1969 - Public Defender Victor D. Carlson Victor D. Carlson Victor D. Carlson Charles K. Cranston Marvin S. Frankel 1969 by Governor Keith Miller Stanley Ditus Harold W. Tobey Marvin S. Frankel Johnston Jeffries Irwin Ravin Warren A. Taylor Harold W. Tobey Benjamin O. Walters, Jr. Meeting Date 6/20/1969 1970 - Chief Justice - Buell A. Nesbett Justice George F. Boney Justice George F. Boney Justice George F. Boney Justice John H. Dimond Justice John H. Dimond 1970 by Governor Keith Miller Judge C.J. Occhipinti Meeting Date 4/3/1970 1970 - Supreme Court Justice - Buell Nesbett Robert C. Erwin Robert C. Erwin Robert C. Erwin L.S. Kurtz, Jr. L.S. Kurtz, Jr. 1970 by Governor Keith Miller Judge Eben H. Lewis Judge Eben H. Lewis Judge C.J. Occhipinti Robert A. Parrish Robert A. Parrish Judge William H.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Mike Kelly, Sean Parnell, Thomas A. Frank, Nancy Kierzek, Derek Magee, Robin Sauter, Michae
    Received 11/27/2020 9:08:00 PM Supreme Court Middle District Filed 11/27/2020 9:08:00 PM Supreme Court Middle District 68 MAP 2020 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIKE KELLY, SEAN PARNELL, THOMAS A. FRANK, NANCY KIERZEK, DEREK MAGEE, ROBIN SAUTER, MICHAEL KINCAID, and WANDA LOGAN, Petitioners, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA No. 68 MAP 2020 GENERAL ASSEMBLY, THOMAS W. WOLF, and KATHY BOOCKVAR, Respondents, DNC SERVICES CORP. / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, Proposed Intervenor- Respondent. PROPOSED INTERVENOR-RESPONDENT DNC’S APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE Proposed-Intervenor DNC Services Corp. / Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) hereby submits this Application for Leave to Intervene, and states the following in support: I. INTRODUCTION Petitioners seek to retroactively invalidate millions of mail-in ballots and enjoin the Commonwealth from finalizing its presidential electors and certifying the remainder of its races. While Petitioners’ claims are meritless, the requested relief, if granted, would significantly impair the electoral prospects of the DNC’s candidates and disenfranchise more than a million of its voters. No party to this proceeding adequately represents the DNC’s interests. Respondents have the duty to enforce Pennsylvania law, which is distinct from the DNC’s particularized interest in having its candidates assume office and its voters’ ballots counted. The DNC’s interests could also break sharply from Respondents’ interests in the event Act 77 is found unconstitutional under Pennsylvania law and the Court must devise an appropriate remedy. This is evident in the parties’ briefs below at the Commonwealth Court, wherein the DNC highlighted the federal constitutional rights which the requested relief would violate—an issue that no other party directly raised.
    [Show full text]
  • The Misrepresented Road to Madame President: Media Coverage of Female Candidates for National Office
    THE MISREPRESENTED ROAD TO MADAME PRESIDENT: MEDIA COVERAGE OF FEMALE CANDIDATES FOR NATIONAL OFFICE by Jessica Pinckney A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Government Baltimore, Maryland May, 2015 © 2015 Jessica Pinckney All Rights Reserved Abstract While women represent over fifty percent of the U.S. population, it is blatantly clear that they are not as equally represented in leadership positions in the government and in private institutions. Despite their representation throughout the nation, women only make up twenty percent of the House and Senate. That is far from a representative number and something that really hurts our society as a whole. While these inequalities exist, they are perpetuated by the world in which we live, where the media plays a heavy role in molding peoples’ opinions, both consciously and subconsciously. The way in which the media presents news about women is not always representative of the women themselves and influences public opinion a great deal, which can also affect women’s ability to rise to the top, thereby breaking the ultimate glass ceilings. This research looks at a number of cases in which female politicians ran for and/or were elected to political positions at the national level (President, Vice President, and Congress) and seeks to look at the progress, or lack thereof, in media’s portrayal of female candidates running for office. The overarching goal of the research is to simply show examples of biased and unbiased coverage and address the negative or positive ways in which that coverage influences the candidate.
    [Show full text]
  • Highly Partisan Reception Greets Palin As V.P. Pick
    ABC NEWS POLL: THE PALIN PICK EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE AFTER 7 a.m. Friday, Sept. 5, 2008 Highly Partisan Reception Greets Palin as V.P. Pick Sarah Palin is receiving a highly partisan reception on the national political stage, with significant public doubts about her readiness to serve as president, yet majority approval of both her selection by John McCain and her willingness to join the Republican ticket. Given the sharp political divisions she inspires, Palin’s initial impact on vote preferences and on views of McCain looks like a wash, and, contrary to some prognostication, she does not draw disproportionate support from women. But she could potentially assist McCain by energizing the GOP base, in which her reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Half of Americans have a favorable first impression of Palin, 37 percent unfavorable, with the rest undecided. Her positive ratings soar to 85 percent among Republicans, 81 percent among her fellow evangelical white Protestants and 74 percent of conservatives. Just a quarter of Democrats agree, with independents in the middle. Favorable Ratings ABC News poll 100% Democrats Independents Republicans 85% 77% 75% 53% 52% 50% 27% 24% 25% 0% Palin Biden Joe Biden, the Democratic vice presidential nominee, is similarly rated, with slightly fewer unfavorable views and partisanship running in the opposite direction. Palin: Biden: Favorable Unfavorable Favorable Unfavorable All 50% 37 54% 30 Democrats 24 63 77 9 Independents 53 34 52 31 Republicans 85 7 27 60 Men 54 37 55 35 Women 47 36 54 27 IMPACT – The public by a narrow 6-point margin, 25 percent to 19 percent, says Palin’s selection makes them more likely to support McCain, less than the 12-point positive impact of Biden on the Democratic ticket (22 percent more likely to support Barack Obama, 10 percent less so).
    [Show full text]
  • Picking the Vice President
    Picking the Vice President Elaine C. Kamarck Brookings Institution Press Washington, D.C. Contents Introduction 4 1 The Balancing Model 6 The Vice Presidency as an “Arranged Marriage” 2 Breaking the Mold 14 From Arranged Marriages to Love Matches 3 The Partnership Model in Action 20 Al Gore Dick Cheney Joe Biden 4 Conclusion 33 Copyright 36 Introduction Throughout history, the vice president has been a pretty forlorn character, not unlike the fictional vice president Julia Louis-Dreyfus plays in the HBO seriesVEEP . In the first episode, Vice President Selina Meyer keeps asking her secretary whether the president has called. He hasn’t. She then walks into a U.S. senator’s office and asks of her old colleague, “What have I been missing here?” Without looking up from her computer, the senator responds, “Power.” Until recently, vice presidents were not very interesting nor was the relationship between presidents and their vice presidents very consequential—and for good reason. Historically, vice presidents have been understudies, have often been disliked or even despised by the president they served, and have been used by political parties, derided by journalists, and ridiculed by the public. The job of vice president has been so peripheral that VPs themselves have even made fun of the office. That’s because from the beginning of the nineteenth century until the last decade of the twentieth century, most vice presidents were chosen to “balance” the ticket. The balance in question could be geographic—a northern presidential candidate like John F. Kennedy of Massachusetts picked a southerner like Lyndon B.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk University Virginia General Election Voters SUPRC Field
    Suffolk University Virginia General Election Voters AREA N= 600 100% DC Area ........................................ 1 ( 1/ 98) 164 27% West ........................................... 2 51 9% Piedmont Valley ................................ 3 134 22% Richmond South ................................. 4 104 17% East ........................................... 5 147 25% START Hello, my name is __________ and I am conducting a survey for Suffolk University and I would like to get your opinions on some political questions. We are calling Virginia households statewide. Would you be willing to spend three minutes answering some brief questions? <ROTATE> or someone in that household). N= 600 100% Continue ....................................... 1 ( 1/105) 600 100% GEND RECORD GENDER N= 600 100% Male ........................................... 1 ( 1/106) 275 46% Female ......................................... 2 325 54% S2 S2. Thank You. How likely are you to vote in the Presidential Election on November 4th? N= 600 100% Very likely .................................... 1 ( 1/107) 583 97% Somewhat likely ................................ 2 17 3% Not very/Not at all likely ..................... 3 0 0% Other/Undecided/Refused ........................ 4 0 0% Q1 Q1. Which political party do you feel closest to - Democrat, Republican, or Independent? N= 600 100% Democrat ....................................... 1 ( 1/110) 269 45% Republican ..................................... 2 188 31% Independent/Unaffiliated/Other ................. 3 141 24% Not registered
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: the First 50, a Historic Symposium
    Edited by: Steve Chase and Mark Madison 2 Acknowledgments and Sponsors Arctic 50th Historical Special thanks to: Clayton McBride Symposium Planning Team Todd Harless Geoff Haskett, LaVerne Smith, Keith Mantheiy Jay Slack, Director, National and Todd Logan, U.S Fish and Thelma Flynn Conservation Training Center, Wildlife Service, Region 7, Mike Beth Ann Ring U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Boylan, Richard Voss, Larry Bell Laura Creamer Becky Edgar Steve Chase, Chief, Division of Marca Piehuta Education Outreach, National Georgia Jeppesen Conservation Training Center, Sponsors Dawn Lagrotteria U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alicha Burlett Kerrick Reisbig Dr. Mark Madison, Service Historian, National Conservation Gail Testa National Conservation Training Training Center Andrew Weinberg Center, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service George Krull Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Ben German Jimmy Fox, Region 7, U.S. Tara Lowe Fish and Wildlife Service The Conservation Fund Cynthia Fraula-Hahn David Klinger Maureen Clark, Arctic 50th Voices of the South Shepherd University Department of Coordinator, Region 7, U.S. Contemporary Art and Theater Fish and Wildlife Service Patrick Wallace American Conservation Film Festival Sarah Gannon-Nagle, Strategic And for their efforts and support NCTC ARAMARK Staff Communications Manager, National of this symposium, thanks to: NCTC Raven Services Staff Conservation Training Center, NCTC Security Staff U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service All of our speakers Jay Slack Thelma Flynn, Event Planner, Jim Willis National Conservation Training Kelly Kennedy Center, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Rollie Jacobs Beth Stevens Dr. Jim Siegel, National Christine Eustis Conservation Training Center, Karin Christensen U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 6.3.10 Nn Layout 1
    Photo by Tyler Rhodes HONORING THE FALLEN—Veterans lead the procession from the cemetery to Belmont Point during Nome’s Memorial Day celebration May 31. C VOLUME CIX NO. 22 JUNE 3, 2010 Vote tally unkown Recall appears to fail for 4 of 5 school board members, count still unofficial By Tyler Rhodes counts, the most recent conducted By the time Tuesday rolled by hand on May 28, the shifting re- around—a full week after Nome vot- sults appeared as of press time to ers had gone to the ballot box to de- have only succeeded in removing termine the fate of its school one person, Albert McComas, from board—Heather Payenna had spent the five-member board. With razor- a week uncertain of whether or not thin margins between their “yes” she would keep her seat. and “no” votes, Payenna and fellow “I’m just ready, one way or the board member Kirsten Timbers other, to have this election be certi- have oscillated between being re- fied and be in the books,” Payenna called and retained as the succeed- said outside city hall just after noon ing unofficial tallies have come in. on June 1. As of Tuesday after- The most recent numbers—ob- noon, it looked like she would still served by witnesses to the May 28 have to wait. hand recount—would keep both Payenna was on her way to an ex- women on the board with Timbers pected Nome Common Council enjoying a two-vote margin (484 to meeting to canvass and certify the re- retain vs.
    [Show full text]
  • 141097NCJRS.Pdf
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. .. ,. .... ... ... • ... 'r .. .., ~~ • -- .. -•• •... --• ""' - • .. .. .. ·r ,.. .. ~ .. ., J' -- ., I - - I . 4" '. • ~ ". ',.. • •~ ~ • ~ 'I -.,,- <.. • - • I. - • --"~ ,'pi.. alaska judicial council 1029 W. Third Avenue, Suite 201, Anchorage, Alaska 99501-1917 (907) 279-2526 FAX (907) 276-5046 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NON-ATIORNEY MEMBERS William T. Cotton Jim A. Arnesen David A. Dapcevich Leona Dkakok ATIORNEY MEMBERS Mark E. Ashburn Daniel L. Callahan Thomas G. Nave CHAIRMAN. EX OFFICIO Daniel A. Moore, Jr. Chief Justice Supreme Court Message From the Executive Director We are pleased to present the Alaska Judicial Council's Sixteenth Report to the Legislature and Supreme Court for the years 1991 and 1992. The Council reports biennially on its dual constitutional responsibilities of nominating candidates for judicial vacancies and of making reports and recommendations to the supreme court and legislature. The report also covers the statutory mandate to evaluate judges standing for retention and applicants for the Public Defender. This report includes a brief narrative section that summarizes Council activities during 1991 and 1992, and a series of appendices. The appendices include a current listing of statutory and constitutional law affecting the Judicial Council, a log of judicial applicants, nominees and appointees, a log of all sitting judges and their retention election dates, and summaries of Council procedures for judicial selection and retention evaluation. Summaries of the Council's major reports during 1991 and 1992 also are included as appendices. The Judicial Council welcomes your comments and questions about this report. Very truly yours, ~;('~ William T. Cotton Executive Director 141097 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsistence Hunting and Fishing in Alaska: Does Anilca’S Rural Subsistence Priority Really Conflict with the Alaska Constitution?
    MCGEE_CPCXNS.DOC 12/9/2010 3:38:15 PM SUBSISTENCE HUNTING AND FISHING IN ALASKA: DOES ANILCA’S RURAL SUBSISTENCE PRIORITY REALLY CONFLICT WITH THE ALASKA CONSTITUTION? JACK B. MCGEE* ABSTRACT All parties to the subsistence controversy in Alaska (the state and the federal government, sportsmen’s associations, outdoor organizations, and Native groups) have assumed that the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) grants residents of rural Alaska an exclusive right to engage in subsistence hunting and fishing on public lands. As a result, there appears to be an intractable contradiction between the “equal access” provisions of the Alaska Constitution and the subsistence provisions of ANILCA. This Article will question this widespread assumption. It will argue that while it is true that ANILCA creates a subsistence priority preference for rural Alaskans in the sense that at those times when fish or wildlife populations are threatened, rural Alaskans will be the very last group to have their right to subsistence hunting or fishing limited (i.e., ANILCA’s rural preference), the text of ANILCA does not support the claim that it creates a right to subsistence hunting and fishing on public lands that belongs exclusively to residents of rural Alaska. Consequently, there is no intractable contradiction between the Alaska Constitution and ANILCA. INTRODUCTION One of the most divisive and intractable political issues in Alaska is subsistence hunting and fishing. Although the Alaska National Interest Copyright © 2010 Jack B. McGee * B.S., J.D., M.S. (Philosophy), University of Wisconsin. The author is in private practice in Juneau, Alaska and specializes in appellate litigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Diapering the Devil: How Alaska Helped Staunch Befouling by Mismanaged Oil Wealth: a Lesson for Other Oil Rich Nations JAY HAMMOND
    02-933286-70-9 CH 2:0559-8 10/4/12 11:37 AM Page 5 2 Diapering the Devil: How Alaska Helped Staunch Befouling by Mismanaged Oil Wealth: A Lesson for Other Oil Rich Nations JAY HAMMOND Preface “I call petroleum the devil’s excrement. It brings trouble. Look at this locura—waste, corruption, consumption, our public services falling apart. And debt, debt we shall have for years.” So warned Juan Pablo Pérez Alfonso, a Venezuelan founder of OPEC. A September 24, 2004, article in the British magazine The Economist elaborates further on Pérez Alfonso: During the heady oil boom of the mid-1970s . he was seen as an alarmist. In fact, he was astonishingly prescient. Oil producers vastly expanded domestic spending, mostly on gold- plated infrastructure projects that set inflation roaring and left mountains of debt. Worse, this did little for the poor. Venezuela had earned over $600 billion in oil revenues since the mid- 1970s but the real income per person of Pérez Alfonso’s compatriots fell by 15% in the decade after he expressed his disgust. The picture is similar in many OPEC countries. So bloated were their budgets that when oil prices fell to around Editor’s note: This chapter has kept as much as possible Hammond’s original text even though it was an unfinished manuscript. 5 02-933286-70-9 CH 2:0559-8 10/4/12 11:37 AM Page 6 6 Jay Hammond Acknowledgments from Larry Smith, coordinator The Hammond Family: Bella Gardiner Hammond, Jay’s wife, who keeps the home fires burning and who asked her granddaughter, Lauren Stanford, to send me the author's last draft.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Authorities AA-1 to AA-39
    IN THE MATTER OF AN INDEPENDENT REVIEW PROCESS BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION AFILIAS DOMAINS NO. 3 LIMITED, Claimant v. INTERNET CORPORATION FOR ASSIGNED NAMES AND NUMBERS, Respondent ICDR Case No. 01-18-0004-2702 AMICUS VERISIGN, INC.’S APPENDIX OF LEGAL AUTHORITY ICANN INDEPENDENT REVIEW PROCESS June 26, 2020 LIST OF LEGAL AUTHORITIES AUTHORITY DESCRIPTION NO. AA-1 Avila v. Spokane School Dist., 852 F.3d 936 (9th Cir. 2017) Ball Mem’l Hosp., Inc. v. Mut. Hosp. Ins., Inc., 784 F.2d 1325 (7th Cir. AA-2 1986) AA-3 Ballard v. MacCallum, 15 Cal. 2d 439 (1940) AA-4 Bank of Am., N.A. v. Moglia, 330 F.3d 942 (7th Cir. 2003) AA-5 Benton v. Hofmann Plastering Co., 24 Cal. Rptr. 268 (Ct. App. 1962) AA-6 Black’s Law Dictionary (Assignment) (11th ed. 2019) AA-7 Brewer Corp. v. Point Ctr. Fin., Inc., 223 Cal. App. 4th 831 (2014) AA-8 Cal. Civ. Code § 1442 Cal. Ins. Guarantee Assn. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., 203 Cal. App. 4th AA-9 1328 (2012) City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Elec. Illuminating Co., 538 F. Supp. 1306, AA-10 1318 (N.D. Ohio 1980) AA-11 Continental Cas. Co. v. Ryan Inc. E., 974 So. 2d 368, 376 (Fla. 2008) Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. IBT Media Inc., 2019 WL 3082845 AA-12 (N.D. Cal. July 15, 2019) AA-13 Dubuque Stone Prods. Co. v. Fred L. Gray Co., 356 F.2d 718 (8th Cir. 1966) AA-14 Edwards v. Symbolic Int’l Inc., 414 F.
    [Show full text]
  • A. In-Person Voting Is a Criterion for Qualifying to Vote Under the Pennsylvania Constitution, Subject Only to Specified Absentee Voting Exceptions
    No. 20-___ In the Supreme Court of the United States MIKE KELLY, U.S. Congressman; SEAN PARNELL; THOMAS A. FRANK; NANCY KIERZEK; DEREK MAGEE; ROBIN SAUTER; MICHAEL KINCAID; and WANDA LOGAN, Applicants, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY; THOMAS W. WOLF, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and KATHY BOOCKVAR, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Respondents. EMERGENCY APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF INJUNCTION PENDING THE FILING AND DISPOSITION OF A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI To the Honorable Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States and Circuit Justice for the Third Circuit Gregory H. Teufel Counsel of Record OGC Law, LLC 1575 McFarland Rd. Suite 201 Pittsburgh, PA 15216 Telephone: (412) 253-4622 Email: [email protected] Counsel for Applicants/Petitioners December 3, 2020 QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Do the Elections and Electors Clauses of the United States Constitution permit Pennsylvania to violate its state constitution’s restrictions on its lawmaking power when enacting legislation for the conduct of federal elections? 2. Do the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution permit the dismissal of Petitioners’ claims with prejudice, on the basis of laches, where doing so foreclosed any opportunity for Petitioners to seek retrospective and prospective relief for ongoing constitutional violations? PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING All parties listed in the caption. RELATED PROCEEDINGS BELOW Pennsylvania Supreme Court • The Honorable Mike Kelly, et al. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al., Civ. Action No. 68 MAP 2020 (Pa.) – the court entered an opinion granting Respondents’ application for extraordinary jurisdiction, vacating the Commonwealth Court’s November 25, 2020 order and dismissing the Petition for Review with prejudice on November 28, 2020.
    [Show full text]