Broad-Leaved Cudweed ASTERACEAE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Broad-Leaved Cudweed ASTERACEAE Filago pyramidata L. Broad-leaved Cudweed ASTERACEAE Status Endangered UK BAP Priority Species since 1998 Schedule 8 Wildlife & Countryside Act Lead partner: Plantlife International 16 10km squares post 1986 UK Biodiversity Action Plan Proposed targets following the 2005 Targets Review: T1 - Maintain viable populations of this species at all extant sites. T2 - Establish two metapopulations by 2010. Progress on targets as reported in the UKBAP 2002 reporting round can be viewed online at: http://www.ukbap.org.uk/2002OnlineReport/mainframe.htm The full Action Plan for Filago pyramidata can be viewed on the following web site: http://www.ukbap.org.uk/UKPlans.aspx?ID=304 Contents 1 Morphology, Identification, Taxonomy & Genetics.................................................... 2 1.1 Morphology & Identification ............................................................................ 2 1.2 Taxonomic Considerations .............................................................................. 4 1.3 Genetic Implications ...................................................................................... 4 2 Distribution & Current Status ............................................................................... 4 2.1 World .......................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Europe ........................................................................................................ 4 2.3 United Kingdom ............................................................................................ 5 2.3.1 England ................................................................................................. 6 2.3.2 Northern Ireland...................................................................................... 8 2.3.3 Scotland................................................................................................. 8 2.3.4 Wales .................................................................................................... 8 Work on Filago pyramidata is supported by: 1 3 Ecology & Life Cycle............................................................................................ 8 4 Habitat Requirements ......................................................................................... 9 4.1 The Landscape Perspective............................................................................. 9 4.2 Communities & Vegetation ........................................................................... 10 4.3 Summary of Habitat Requirements ................................................................ 11 5 Management Implications .................................................................................. 12 6 Threats / Factors Leading to Loss or Decline or Limiting Recovery............................ 12 7 Current Conservation Measures .......................................................................... 13 7.1 In Situ Measures........................................................................................ 13 7.2 Ex Situ Measures ....................................................................................... 14 7.3 Research Data ............................................................................................ 14 7.4 Monitoring Filago pyramidata & the Common Monitoring Standard .................... 14 8 References ...................................................................................................... 14 9 Acknowledgments............................................................................................. 16 10 Contacts....................................................................................................... 16 11 Links............................................................................................................ 16 1 Morphology, Identification, Taxonomy & Genetics 1.1 MORPHOLOGY & IDENTIFICATION Broad-leaved Cudweed Filago pyramidata (see Figures 1, 2 & 3) is a short-lived annual herb with a slender taproot and from one to several decumbent or ascending flowering stems up to 40cm long. All stems are branched above, frequently with branches below the terminal inflorescence on the main stem. Size varies greatly depending on soil type. On the poorest soils, plants may have single stems as little as a few mm high. Leaves of seedlings and young plants before flowering are in a basal rosette, which dies off as the flowering stems develop. Stem leaves are 3-4mm wide and up to 20mm long. The shape of these is characteristically spathulate, entire, with slightly undulate margins. The stems and leaves are covered with a dense felt of short greyish-white hairs. The flower heads are up to 12mm in diameter, each containing up to 20 capitula of approximately 5mm length. Three to five subtending leaves usually overtop these. The smallest plants can have just a single capitulum. Each capitulum contains a number of tiny florets, with 4-7 hermaphrodite florets in the centre of each, the rest being female. Each capitulum has overlapping rows of 4-6 scarious, cuspidate bracts (“phyllaries”), extended into yellowish awns. There are no obvious petals. Each flower produces a single achene of approximately 0.6mm in length. Those produced by the outermost florets have a pappus longer than the seed (Clapham et al, 1987). This species can be easily confused with the related Common Cudweed Filago vulgaris and Red-tipped Cudweed Filago lutescens. Red-tipped Cudweed has claret-red tipped phyllaries and parallel-sided, pointed leaves. Common Cudweed has only 2-3 hermaphrodite florets in the centre of each capitulum, and lanceolate leaves with strongly undulate margins (Rich & Jermy, 1998; Wilson & King, 2003). 2 Figure 1 – Line drawing of Filago pyramidata (Drawing by Fred Rumsey). Figure 2 – Filago pyramidata (© Plantlife). 3 Figure 3 – Filago pyramidata (© Plantlife). 1.2 TAXONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS None. 1.3 GENETIC IMPLICATIONS No studies on genetic diversity within this species have been carried out. Such a study would be desirable to elucidate relationships between populations. 2 Distribution & Current Status 2.1 WORLD Filago pyramidata occurs in West Asia, North Africa and the Canary Islands (Clapham et al, 1987). 2.2 EUROPE Filago pyramidata is found in south and west Europe, northwards to East England and the Netherlands and eastwards to Bulgaria and the Crimea (Clapham et al, 1987; Table 1). There are two records for Filago pyramidata as a casual from the Channel Islands in 1881 and 1910. Filago pyramidata has never been recorded in Ireland. 4 Table 1 - Country by country status of Filago pyramidata across Europe. IUCN COUNTRY* STATUS NOTES SOURCE(S) LISTING AL ALBANIA Present but status not known Tutin et al (1976) AZ AZORES ? present Tutin et al (1976) BE BELGIUM WITH LUXEMBOURG Present but status not known Tutin et al (1976) BL ISLAS BALEARES Present but status not known Tutin et al (1976) BR BRITAIN EN Declined in response to Wigginton (1999) INCL ORKNEY, ZETLAND & arable intensification over the ISLE OF MAN first half of 20th century. Now restricted to just 9 sites. BU BULGARIA Present but status not known Tutin et al (1976) CO CORSE Present but status not known Tutin et al (1976) CR KRITI Present but status not known Tutin et al (1976) WITH GAVDHOS, KARPATHOS & KASOS GA FRANCE Not listed Olivier et al (1995) GE GERMANY Present but status not known Tutin et al (1976) GR GREECE Not listed Phitos et al (1995) EXCL. KRITI & ISLANDS OUTSIDE EUROPE HE SWITZERLAND Present but status not known Tutin et al (1976) HO NETHERLANDS Present but status not known Tutin et al (1976) HS SPAIN Not listed Lozano (2000) WITH GIBRALTAR & ANDORRA, EXCL BL IT ITALY Not listed Conti et al (1997) JU YUGOSLAVIA SERBIA Not critically endangered Stevanović (1999) LU PORTUGAL Present but status not known Tutin et al (1976) RS(K) KRYM (CRIMEA) Present but status not known Tutin et al (1976) SA SARDEGNA Present but status not known Tutin et al (1976) SI SICILIA Present but status not known Tutin et al (1976) TU TURKEY Present but status not known Tutin et al (1976) *Country codes are taken from Flora Europaea as of 1964 with red data book listings where available [Definitions of the red list categories]. 2.3 UNITED KINGDOM OVERVIEW Filago pyramidata has never been a widespread or common species in Britain, and its past distribution may have been partly obscured by confusion with other closely related species. Before 1970 it was recorded in 114 10km squares (Preston et al, 2002), while between 1987 and 1999 it was only recorded in 16 10km squares. It is now known in only nine sites in nine 10km squares (see Figure 4). While this appears to be a massive decline, some caution must be observed in the interpretation of these figures, as this is a species with a history of erratic appearance at many localities. There have never been more than 32 records for this species from any decade (Rich, 1995). It is always difficult to interpret past distributions from herbarium and published records. Common plants will be relatively under-collected, while rare species will be over-collected. The frequency of multiple collections from the same sites suggests that it may have been less abundant in the past than the distribution maps indicate. The great majority of losses from vice-counties occurred in the 19th century and the first half of the 20th century (Wilson, 5 1999), but losses from within its range have continued to the present day. Nevertheless this species does appear to have been lost from many parts
Recommended publications
  • Phylogeny and Evolution of Achenial Trichomes In
    Luebert & al. • Achenial trichomes in the Lucilia-group (Asteraceae) TAXON 66 (5) • October 2017: 1184–1199 Phylogeny and evolution of achenial trichomes in the Lucilia-group (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae) and their systematic significance Federico Luebert,1,2,3 Andrés Moreira-Muñoz,4 Katharina Wilke2 & Michael O. Dillon5 1 Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für Biologie, Botanik, Altensteinstraße 6, 14195 Berlin, Germany 2 Universität Bonn, Nees-Institut für Biodiversität der Pflanzen, Meckenheimer Allee 170, 53115 Bonn, Germany 3 Universidad de Chile, Departamento de Silvicultura y Conservación de la Naturaleza, Santiago, Chile 4 Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Instituto de Geografía, Avenida Brasil 2241, Valparaíso, Chile 5 The Field Museum, Integrative Research Center, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605, U.S.A. Author for correspondence: Federico Luebert, [email protected] ORCID FL, http://orcid.org/0000­0003­2251­4056; MOD, http://orcid.org/0000­0002­7512­0766 DOI https://doi.org/10.12705/665.11 Abstract The Gnaphalieae (Asteraceae) are a cosmopolitan tribe with around 185 genera and 2000 species. The New World is one of the centers of diversity of the tribe with 24 genera and over 100 species, most of which form a clade called the Lucilia­group with 21 genera. However, the generic classification of the Lucilia­group has been controversial with no agreement on delimitation or circumscription of genera. Especially controversial has been the taxonomic value of achenial trichomes and molecular studies have shown equivocal results so far. The major aims of this paper are to provide a nearly complete phylogeny of the Lucilia­ group at generic level and to discuss the evolutionary trends and taxonomic significance of achenial trichome morphology.
    [Show full text]
  • How Many of Cassini Anagrams Should There Be? Molecular
    TAXON 59 (6) • December 2010: 1671–1689 Galbany-Casals & al. • Systematics and phylogeny of the Filago group How many of Cassini anagrams should there be? Molecular systematics and phylogenetic relationships in the Filago group (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae), with special focus on the genus Filago Mercè Galbany-Casals,1,3 Santiago Andrés-Sánchez,2,3 Núria Garcia-Jacas,1 Alfonso Susanna,1 Enrique Rico2 & M. Montserrat Martínez-Ortega2 1 Institut Botànic de Barcelona (CSIC-ICUB), Pg. del Migdia s.n., 08038 Barcelona, Spain 2 Departamento de Botánica, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain 3 These authors contributed equally to this publication. Author for correspondence: Mercè Galbany-Casals, [email protected] Abstract The Filago group (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae) comprises eleven genera, mainly distributed in Eurasia, northern Africa and northern America: Ancistrocarphus, Bombycilaena, Chamaepus, Cymbolaena, Evacidium, Evax, Filago, Logfia, Micropus, Psilocarphus and Stylocline. The main morphological character that defines the group is that the receptacular paleae subtend, and more or less enclose, the female florets. The aims of this work are, with the use of three chloroplast DNA regions (rpl32-trnL intergenic spacer, trnL intron, and trnL-trnF intergenic spacer) and two nuclear DNA regions (ITS, ETS), to test whether the Filago group is monophyletic; to place its members within Gnaphalieae using a broad sampling of the tribe; and to investigate in detail the phylogenetic relationships among the Old World members of the Filago group and provide some new insight into the generic circumscription and infrageneric classification based on natural entities. Our results do not show statistical support for a monophyletic Filago group.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora Mediterranea 26
    FLORA MEDITERRANEA 26 Published under the auspices of OPTIMA by the Herbarium Mediterraneum Panormitanum Palermo – 2016 FLORA MEDITERRANEA Edited on behalf of the International Foundation pro Herbario Mediterraneo by Francesco M. Raimondo, Werner Greuter & Gianniantonio Domina Editorial board G. Domina (Palermo), F. Garbari (Pisa), W. Greuter (Berlin), S. L. Jury (Reading), G. Kamari (Patras), P. Mazzola (Palermo), S. Pignatti (Roma), F. M. Raimondo (Palermo), C. Salmeri (Palermo), B. Valdés (Sevilla), G. Venturella (Palermo). Advisory Committee P. V. Arrigoni (Firenze) P. Küpfer (Neuchatel) H. M. Burdet (Genève) J. Mathez (Montpellier) A. Carapezza (Palermo) G. Moggi (Firenze) C. D. K. Cook (Zurich) E. Nardi (Firenze) R. Courtecuisse (Lille) P. L. Nimis (Trieste) V. Demoulin (Liège) D. Phitos (Patras) F. Ehrendorfer (Wien) L. Poldini (Trieste) M. Erben (Munchen) R. M. Ros Espín (Murcia) G. Giaccone (Catania) A. Strid (Copenhagen) V. H. Heywood (Reading) B. Zimmer (Berlin) Editorial Office Editorial assistance: A. M. Mannino Editorial secretariat: V. Spadaro & P. Campisi Layout & Tecnical editing: E. Di Gristina & F. La Sorte Design: V. Magro & L. C. Raimondo Redazione di "Flora Mediterranea" Herbarium Mediterraneum Panormitanum, Università di Palermo Via Lincoln, 2 I-90133 Palermo, Italy [email protected] Printed by Luxograph s.r.l., Piazza Bartolomeo da Messina, 2/E - Palermo Registration at Tribunale di Palermo, no. 27 of 12 July 1991 ISSN: 1120-4052 printed, 2240-4538 online DOI: 10.7320/FlMedit26.001 Copyright © by International Foundation pro Herbario Mediterraneo, Palermo Contents V. Hugonnot & L. Chavoutier: A modern record of one of the rarest European mosses, Ptychomitrium incurvum (Ptychomitriaceae), in Eastern Pyrenees, France . 5 P. Chène, M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of British Columbia Part 1 - Gymnosperms and Dicotyledons (Aceraceae Through Cucurbitaceae)
    The Vascular Plants of British Columbia Part 1 - Gymnosperms and Dicotyledons (Aceraceae through Cucurbitaceae) by George W. Douglas1, Gerald B. Straley2 and Del Meidinger3 1 George Douglas 2 Gerald Straley 3 Del Meidinger 6200 North Road Botanical Garden Research Branch R.R.#2 University of British Columbia B.C. Ministry of Forests Duncan, B.C. V9L 1N9 6501 S.W. Marine Drive 31 Bastion Square Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z4 Victoria, B. C. V8W 3E7 April 1989 Ministry of Forests THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Part 1 - Gymnosperms and Dicotyledons (Aceraceae through Cucurbitaceae) Contributors: Dr. G.W. Douglas, Douglas Ecological Consultants Ltd., Duncan, B.C. — Aceraceae through Betulaceae Brassicaceae (except Arabis, Cardamine and Rorippa) through Cucurbitaceae. Mr. D. Meidinger, Research Branch, B.C. Ministry of Forests, Victoria, B.C. — Gymnosperms. Dr. G.B. Straley, Botanical Garden, University of B.C., Vancouver, B.C. — Boraginaceae, Arabis and Rorippa. With the cooperation of the Royal British Columbia Museum and the Botanical University of British Columbia. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful to Dr. G.A. Allen for providing valuable suggestions during the initial stages of the project. Thanks are also due to Drs. G.A. Allen, A. Ceska and F. Ganders for reviewing taxonomically difficult groups. Mrs. O. Ceska reviewed the final draft of Part 1. Mr. G. Mulligan kindly searched the DAO herbarium and provided information on Brassicaceae. Dr. G. Argus helped with records from CAN. Louise Gronmyr and Jean Stringer kindly typed most of the contributions and helped in many ways in the production of the final manuscript which was typeset by Beth Collins.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollen Morphology of Tribes Gnaphalieae, Helenieae, Plucheeae and Senecioneae (Subfamily Asteroideae) of Compositae from Egypt
    American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2011, 2, 120-133 doi:10.4236/ajps.2011.22014 Published Online June 2011 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/ajps) Pollen Morphology of Tribes Gnaphalieae, Helenieae, Plucheeae and Senecioneae (Subfamily Asteroideae) of Compositae from Egypt Ahmed Kamal El-Deen Osman Faculty of Science, Botany Department, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt. Email: [email protected] Received October 10th, 2010; revised December 9th, 2010; accepted December 20th, 2010. ABSTRACT POLLEN morphology of twenty five species representing 12 genera of tribes Gnaphalieae, Helenieae, Plucheeae and Senecioneae (Asteroideae: Asteraceae) was investigated using light and scanning electron microscopy. The genera are Phagnalon, Filago, Gnaphalium, Helichrysum, Homognaphalium, Ifloga, Lasiopogon, Pseudognaphalium, Flaveria, Tagetes, Sphaeranthus and Senecio. Two pollen types were recognized viz. Senecio pollen type and Filago pollen type. Description of each type, a key to the investigated taxa as well as LM and SEM micrographs of pollen grains are pro- vided. Keywords: Pollen, Morphology, Asteroideae, Asteraceae, Egypt 1. Introduction ture involves the foot layer and the outer layer of the endexine and the endoaperture involves the inner layer of Gnaphalieae, Helenieae, Plucheeae and Senecioneae (As- the endoxine. The intine is thickened considerably in teroideae: Asteraceae) are of the well represented tribes Anthemideae near the aperture. Reference [8] described in Egypt, where 12 genera with about thirty five species are native in
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Flora Checklist a Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium
    Washington Flora Checklist A checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium The Washington Flora Checklist aims to be a complete list of the native and naturalized vascular plants of Washington State, with current classifications, nomenclature and synonymy. The checklist currently contains 3,929 terminal taxa (species, subspecies, and varieties). Taxa included in the checklist: * Native taxa whether extant, extirpated, or extinct. * Exotic taxa that are naturalized, escaped from cultivation, or persisting wild. * Waifs (e.g., ballast plants, escaped crop plants) and other scarcely collected exotics. * Interspecific hybrids that are frequent or self-maintaining. * Some unnamed taxa in the process of being described. Family classifications follow APG IV for angiosperms, PPG I (J. Syst. Evol. 54:563?603. 2016.) for pteridophytes, and Christenhusz et al. (Phytotaxa 19:55?70. 2011.) for gymnosperms, with a few exceptions. Nomenclature and synonymy at the rank of genus and below follows the 2nd Edition of the Flora of the Pacific Northwest except where superceded by new information. Accepted names are indicated with blue font; synonyms with black font. Native species and infraspecies are marked with boldface font. Please note: This is a working checklist, continuously updated. Use it at your discretion. Created from the Washington Flora Checklist Database on September 17th, 2018 at 9:47pm PST. Available online at http://biology.burke.washington.edu/waflora/checklist.php Comments and questions should be addressed to the checklist administrators: David Giblin ([email protected]) Peter Zika ([email protected]) Suggested citation: Weinmann, F., P.F. Zika, D.E. Giblin, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Red-Tipped Cudweed
    Watsonia 22: 251-260 (1999) 251 Conservation of Britain's biodiversity: Filago lutescens Jordan (Asteraceae), Red-tipped cudweed T. c. G. RICH Department of Biodiversity and Systematic Biology, National Museum and Gallery of Wales, CardiffCFl3NP ABSTRACT This paper summarizes the conservation work being carried out on Filago lutescens L. (Asteraceae), Red-tipped cudweed, a rare, statutorily protected species in Britain. It is a winter or spring annual, germinating mainly in the autumn, and flowering from June to October. Its habitats are mainly arable fields, tracks and path sides, open sandy ground, sand pits and commons or heathland usually in Thero-Airetalia vegetation. It has been recorded in a total of at least 212 sites in 86 10-km squares in south-eastern England, but has been seen in only 14 sites in ten 10-km squares since 1990. It appears to have declined in arable field habitats owing to changes in agricultural practices, and in tracks and heath land owing to reduced disturbance. Much of the decline took place before the 1960s. Population counts for all extant sites between 1993 and 1996 show marked variation from year to year and marked differences between sites. The best conservation management is currently thought to be annual disturbance by digging or rotavation in early autumn. This species is still under severe threat in Britain; only two extant sites have statutory protection and the two largest populations are unprotected. KEYWORDS: population size, ecology, distribution, habitat management, rare species. INTRODUCTION Filago lutescens Jordan (F. apiculata G. E. Srn. ex Bab.; Asteraceae), Red-tipped cudweed, is a rare species in Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • July/August, 2017
    LOST PINES CHAPTER Texas Master Naturalist July/August 2017 Volume 16, Issue 4 Enduring Nobly by Larry Gfeller Oak trees hold a special place in my heart from early childhood days. Strong and enduring, these trees have anchored rope swings over secluded swimming holes, secreted hastily constructed tree houses from unwanted trespassers and provided overhead shade for summer picnics under the lemon sun. I recall leafy, tree-lined tunnels under a radiant sky or watching shadows of great branches reaching across a creek in the slanting afternoon sun as they continue up the bank, covering us all. What kind of oaks these were, I hadn’t a clue—but my elders assured me they were oaks, and I believed them. In this part of Texas the dominant oak tree is the Post oak—it is the namesake for our ecosystem. Blackjack oaks are less prevalent but plentiful. Even more obscure in our neck of the woods is the Bluejack oak. While attributed with similar genetics as its beefier brethren, the Bluejack oak is mostly a short, scrubby understory tree, reclusive and scarce, all but lost among the more ostentatious species. I first learned of the Bluejack oak from the Texas Forest Service. At my request, a forester visited my property to help me understand the various species of trees growing there at the time. As I recall, the Bluejack was more bush-like and easily overlooked. We only spotted a single specimen on our property tour. Its name, I was told, came from the bluish tinge to the elongated, alternating leaves.
    [Show full text]
  • La Flora Vascolare Della Penisola Del Sinis (Sardegna Occidentale)
    AFlcotraa Bvaostcaonliacrae MPeanliascoiltaa ndael 3S3i.n 9is1-124 Málaga, 209018 LA FLORA VASCOLARE DELLA PENISOLA DEL SINIS (SARDEGNA OCCIDENTALE) Giuseppe FENU & Gianluigi BACCHETTA* Centro Conservazione Biodiversità (CCB). Dipartimento di Scienze Botaniche. Università degli Studi di Cagliari v.le Sant’Ignazio da Laconi, 13. 09123 Cagliari (Italia) *Corresponding author: [email protected] Recibido el 17 de noviembre de 2007, aceptado para su publicación el 18 de febrero de 2008 Publicado "on line" en marzo de 2008 RIASSUNTO. La flora vascolare della Penisola del Sinis (Sardegna Occidentale). Viene presentato lo studio della flora vascolare della Penisola del Sinis; in totale sono state rinvenute 760 unità tassonomiche e in particolare 615 specie, 134 sottospecie, 10 varietà e 1 ibrido, riferibili a 365 generi e 87 famiglie. Le Eudicots sono risultate il gruppo sistematico dominante. Le famiglie più rappresentate sono: Poaceae (99 unità tassonomiche), Fabaceae e Asteraceae (85), Caryophyllaceae (33), Apiaceae (27) e Orchidaceae (24). I generi con maggior numero di taxa sono: Trifolium (19), Silene (14), Limonium e Medicago (13), Ophrys (12), Euphorbia e Vicia (10), Plantago (9), Allium (8) e infine Lotus, Ranunculus e Vulpia (7). Il contingente delle endemiche (54 unità tassonomiche) è risultato pari al 8,97% della componente mediterranea e mostra una dominanza degli elementi sardo-corsi (33,33%) e secondariamente sardi (24,10%), i quali unitamente raggiungono il 57,43% del totale. La flora endemica è costituita da 31 specie, 17 sottospecie e 6 varietà, inquadrati in 38 generi e 22 famiglie. Le famiglie più rappresentate sono risultate le Plumbaginaceae (10), Asteraceae e Lamiaceae (5), Fabaceae (4), Alliaceae, Euphorbiaceae e Ranunculaceae (3); il genere più ricco è risultato Limonium (10), seguito da Allium, Delphinium, Euphorbia, Scrophularia, Silene e Teucrium (2).
    [Show full text]
  • 05. 923-0920, İsa, the Plant, 784491
    www.biodicon.com Biological Diversity and Conservation ISSN 1308-8084 Online ISSN 1308-5301 Print Research article/Araştırma makalesi DOI: 10.46309/biodicon.2020. 784491 13/3 (2020) 217-231 The Plant biodiversity of Ankara University 10. yıl (Beşevler) campus İsa BAŞKÖSE *1, Selçuk Tuğrul KÖRÜKLÜ 1, Ahmet Emre YAPYAK1 ORCID: 0000-0001-7347-3464; 0000-0002-7440-6818; 0000-0001-6464-2641 1 Ankara Üniversitesi, Fen Fakültesi, Biyoloji Bölümü, 06100 Ankara, Turkey Abstract In this study, it was aimed to determine the seed plant diversity of Ankara University 10. Yıl (Beşevler) Campus. As a result of the study, a total of 445 taxa belonging to 281 genera from 79 different families were determined. From Gymnospermae subdivision, 31 taxa belong to 14 genera of 5 families were determined. From Angiospermae subdivision, 57 taxa from 10 families belong to Monocotyl group, 356 taxa from 63 families belong to Eudicot groups, and 1 taxa from 1 family (Nymphaceae) Non-Eudicot basal group were determined. The eight of the determined 445 taxa are endemic for Turkey with the ratio of 1,8%. In addition, 151 of the taxa in the campus area are woody (trees or shrubs) and the remaining 294 taxa are annual or perennial herbaceous plants. In addition, 266 of the taxa in the campus area grow naturally, but the remaining 179 taxa are not natural (plantation or cultivation). Key words: Ankara University, B4 square, campus, endemic, flora ---------- ---------- Ankara Üniversitesi 10. yıl (Beşevler) yerleşkesinin bitki biyoçeşitliliği Özet Bu çalışmada, Ankara Üniversitesi 10. Yıl (Beşevler) yerleşkesinin tohumlu bitki çeşitliliği belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda yerleşke içerisinde 79 farklı familyadan, 281 cinse ait tür ve tür altı düzeyde toplam 445 takson tespit edilmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Management 147: 108–123
    Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation Manuscript - NO track change Click here to view linked References Can artificial ecosystems enhance local biodiversity? The case of a constructed wetland in a 1 2 Mediterranean urban context 3 4 Abstract 5 6 7 Constructed wetlands (CW) are considered a successful tool to treat wastewater in many countries: 8 9 5 their success is mainly assessed observing the rate of pollution reduction, but CW can also 10 11 contribute to the conservation of ecosystem services. Among the many ecosystem services 12 13 provided, the biodiversity of constructed wetlands has received less attention. 14 The EcoSistema Filtro (ESF) of the Molentargius-Saline Regional Natural Park is a constructed 15 16 wetland situated in Sardinia (Italy), built to filter treated wastewater, increase habitat diversity and 17 18 10 enhance local biodiversity. A floristic survey has been carried out yearly one year after the 19 20 construction of the artificial ecosystem in 2004, observing the modification of the vascular flora 21 22 composition in time. The flora of the ESF accounted for 54% of the whole Regional Park’s flora; 23 alien species amount to 12%, taxa of conservation concern are 6%. Comparing the data in the years, 24 25 except for the biennium 2006/2007, we observed a continuous increase of species richness, together 26 27 15 with an increase of endemics, species of conservation concern and alien species too. Once the 28 29 endemics appeared, they remained part of the flora, showing a good persistence in the artificial 30 31 wetland.
    [Show full text]
  • Glandular Hairs of the Ovary: a Helpful Character for Asteroideae (Asteraceae) Taxonomy?
    Ann. Bot. Fennici 44: 1–7 ISSN 0003-3847 Helsinki 16 March 2007 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 2007 Glandular hairs of the ovary: a helpful character for Asteroideae (Asteraceae) taxonomy? Daniela Ciccarelli*, Fabio Garbari & Anna M. Pagni Department of Biology, University of Pisa, via Luca Ghini 5, I-56126, Italy (*corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected]) Received 19 Dec. 2005, revised version received 9 June 2006, accepted 14 June 2006 Ciccarelli, D., Garbari, F. & Pagni, A. M. 2007: Glandular hairs of the ovary: a helpful character for Asteroideae (Asteraceae) taxonomy? — Ann. Bot. Fennici 44: 1–7. Surface microcharacters of the ovary of the Asteraceae were studied, especially biseriate glandular hairs. Of 34 species belonging to the Asteroideae, only Dittrichia viscosa, Pulicaria dysenterica, Bellis perennis, Tanacetum parthenium, Achillea mar- itima, Matricaria chamomilla, and Eupatorium cannabinum possess glandular hairs on the ovary. Additional characters considered are hair morphology and distribution, cell number, and presence of subcuticular chambers and chloroplasts. The usefulness of glandular hairs of the ovary for taxonomic purposes is discussed. Key words: Asteraceae, Asteroideae, glandular hairs, light microscopy, ovary, SEM, taxonomy Introduction (Ascensão et al. 2001).Investigations referring to a supraspecific taxon are scarce. Carlquist (1958) In the Asteraceae both non-glandular and glandu- analysed the structure and ontogenesis of glandu- lar hairs are present (Metcalfe & Chalk 1950). The lar hairs of Madinae, demonstrating their taxo- non-glandular hairs are represented by numerous nomic and evolutionary significance. Napp-Zinn morphological types, whereas the glandular hairs and Eble (1980) took into consideration the glan- are more homogeneous.
    [Show full text]