DOCSLIB.ORG

Halfway Malin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Halfway Malin Halfway Malin Botany Report Prepared by: Bruce Davidson Botanist, TEAMS Enterprise Unit for: St. Joe Ranger District Idaho Panhandle National Forests September 15, 2015 Updated August 15, 2016 by Lynette Myhre IDT Team Leader, St. Joe RD NEPA Coordinator In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected] . USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender. ____________________________________________________ The Forest Service uses the most current and complete data available. Geographic information system (GIS) data and product accuracy may vary. They may be developed from sources of differing accuracy, accurate only at certain scales based on modeling or interpretation, incomplete while being created or revised, etc. Using GIS products for purposed other than those for which they were created may yield inaccurate or misleading results. If a map contains contours, these contours were generated and filtered using the Digital Elevation Model (DEM) files. Any contours generated from DEMs using a scale of less than 1:100,000 will lead to less reliable results and should only be used for display purposes. For more information contact the St. Joe Ranger District at 222 S. 7th Street Suite 1, St. Maries, Idaho, 83861; (208)245-2531. Reported mileages are estimates and may vary depending on how they are rounded and what models and equations they are used for or result from. Resource Report Title of Project Contents Botany ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Regulatory Framework ............................................................................................................... 1 Analysis Area and Temporal Scope ............................................................................................ 2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 2 Affected Environment ................................................................................................................. 4 Species and Habitat Descriptions ............................................................................................ 4 Species Considered in the Analysis ......................................................................................... 8 Existing Condition ................................................................................................................. 10 Environmental Consequences ................................................................................................... 12 Alternative A – No Action .................................................................................................... 12 Alternative B – Proposed Action ........................................................................................... 12 Alternative C ......................................................................................................................... 18 Compliance with LRMP and Other Relevant Laws, Regulations, Policies and Plans .......... 21 Summary of Determinations .................................................................................................. 21 Summary of Environmental Effects .......................................................................................... 22 References Cited ....................................................................................................................... 24 Appendix A. St. Joe Ranger District Rare Plant Lists and Habitat Guilds ............................... 26 St. Joe Sensitive Plants by Rare Plant Habitat Guild (revised 2011)* .................................. 26 St. Joe Plant Species of Concern* (revised 2011) ................................................................. 26 St. Joe Ranger District Rare Plant Habitat Guild Descriptions ............................................. 27 Appendix B. Maps of Affected TEPS plant habitats ............................................................... 30 Tables Table 1: Botany indicators and measures for assessing effects ....................................................... 3 Table 2. Plant Species Preliminary Analysis Results. ..................................................................... 8 Table 3: Botany indicators and measures for the existing condition ............................................. 11 Table 4. Botany indicators and measures for Alternative A .......................................................... 12 Table 5: Botany indicators and measures for Alternative B .......................................................... 17 Table 6: Botany indicators and measures for Alternative C .......................................................... 20 Table 7. Summary comparison of environmental effects to botany resources .............................. 23 i Botany Report Halfway Malin Project Botany Introduction The purpose of this Biological Evaluation /Assessment (BEBA) is to analyze and disclose the effects of proposed activities on all federally listed threatened, endangered, proposed, and Forest Service Region 1 sensitive (TEPS) plants that are known to occur, or have the potential to occur within the Halfway/Malin Project area on the St. Joe Ranger District of the Idaho Panhandle National Forest (IPNF). In order to increase forest resilience, increase the quality and quantity of browse for big game wildlife species, contribute to a sustainable level of timber products, improve aquatic conditions, and reduce road maintenance costs, the proposed project is to harvest timber, apply prescribed fire, remove a culvert, construct new roads, store or gate roads, and decommission roads. Ground disturbing activities included in the proposed action have potential to damage these plant species. No Federally Listed Threatened or Endangered plants are known or suspected in the project area and none were found during surveys. One Forest Service Sensitive plant is known to occur in the project area. If any additional sites are found in the future that are deemed necessary to ensure species and population viability and prevent a potential trend towards federal listing, those sites would be protected. Regulatory Framework Endangered Species Act The purpose of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) is to provide a means whereby the ecosystems upon which endangered species and threatened species depend may be conserved and to provide for the conservation of such endangered species and threatened species. The ESA directs federal agencies to ensure that actions authorized, funded, or carried out by these agencies are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of threatened or endangered species, or result in the destruction or adverse modification of their critical habitats (ESA Section 7(a)(2)). National Forest Management Act The National Forest Management Act (NFMA) of 1976 is the primary statute governing the administration of national forests and was an amendment to the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974, which called for the management of renewable resources on National Forest system lands. NFMA changed forest planning by requiring the Forest Service to use a systematic and interdisciplinary approach to resource management, also providing for public involvement in preparing and revising forest plans. This includes a requirement for project-level planning to be in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act and Land and Resource Management Plans. Forest Service Manual Forest Service Manual direction (FSM 2672.1 and FSM 2672.43) requires that activities
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Representativeness Assessment of Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho
    USDA United States Department of Representativeness Assessment of Agriculture Forest Service Research Natural Areas on Rocky Mountain Research Station National Forest System Lands General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-45 in Idaho March 2000 Steven K. Rust Abstract Rust, Steven K. 2000. Representativeness assessment of research natural areas on National Forest System lands in Idaho. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-45. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 129 p. A representativeness assessment of National Forest System (N FS) Research Natural Areas in ldaho summarizes information on the status of the natural area network and priorities for identification of new Research Natural Areas. Natural distribution and abundance of plant associations is compared to the representation of plant associations within natural areas. Natural distribution and abundance is estimated using modeled potential natural vegetation, published classification and inventory data, and Heritage plant community element occur- rence data. Minimum criteria are applied to select only viable, high quality plant association occurrences. In assigning natural area selection priorities, decision rules are applied to encompass consideration of the adequacy and viability of representation. Selected for analysis were 1,024 plant association occurrences within 21 4 natural areas (including 115 NFS Research Natural Areas). Of the 1,566 combinations of association within ecological sections, 28 percent require additional data for further analysis; 8, 40, and 12 percent, respectively, are ranked from high to low conservation priority; 13 percent are fully represented. Patterns in natural area needs vary between ecological section. The result provides an operational prioritization of Research Natural Area needs at landscape and subregional scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a List of Preparers and Reviewers
    Glossary adfluvial —Referring to fish that live in lakes and no significant impact, aids an agency’s compliance migrate to rivers and streams. with the National Environmental Policy Act when Beyond the Boundaries —National Wildlife Refuge no environmental impact statement is necessary, Association program to expand conservation work and facilitates preparation of a statement when to areas outside national wildlife refuge borders. one is necessary. BRWCA —Bear River Watershed Conservation Area. fluvial —Referring to fish that live in rivers and candidate species —A species of plant or animal for streams. which the USFWS has sufficient information on GCN —(A species of) greatest conservation need. their biological status and threats to propose them HAPET —Habitat and Population Evaluation Team. as endangered or threatened under the Endan- Important Bird Areas Program —A global effort to gered Species Act, but for which development of find and conserve areas that are vital to birds a proposed listing regulation is precluded by other and other biodiversity sponsored by the National higher priority listing activities. Audubon Society. CFR —Code of Federal Regulations. Intermountain West Joint Venture —Diverse partner- CO2 —Carbon dioxide. ship of 18 entities including Federal agencies, conservation easement —A legally enforceable State agencies, nonprofit conservation organiza- encumbrance or transfer of property rights to a tions, and for-profit organizations representing government agency or land trust for the purposes agriculture and industry. IWJV was founded in of conservation. Rights transferred could include 1994 to facilitate bird conservation across the vast the discretion to subdivide or develop land, change 495 million acres of the Intermountain West.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Strategy for Spokane River Basin Wetlands
    CONSERVATION STRATEGY FOR SPOKANE RIVER BASIN WETLANDS Prepared by Mabel Jankovsky-Jones Conservation Data Center June 1999 Idaho Department of Fish and Game Natural Resource Policy Bureau 600 South Walnut, P.O. Box 25 Boise, ID 83707 Jerry Mallet, Interim Director Report prepared with funding from the United States Environmental Protection Agency through Section 104(b) (3) of the Clean Water Act Grant No. CD990620-01-0 SUMMARY The Idaho Conservation Data Center has received wetland protection grant funding from the Environmental Protection Agency under the authority of Section 104 (b)(3) of the Clean Water Act to enhance existing wetland information systems. The information summarized here can be applied to state biodiversity, conservation, and water quality enhancement projects on a watershed basis. Previous project areas included the Henrys Fork Basin, Big Wood River Basin, southeastern Idaho watersheds, the Idaho Panhandle, and east-central basins. This document is a summary of information compiled for the Spokane River Basin. We used the United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) to gain a broad perspective on the areal extant and types of wetlands in the survey area. Land ownership and management layers were overlaid on the NWI to determine ownership and the protected status of wetlands. Plant communities occurring in the survey area were placed into the hierarchical NWI classification and provide information relative to on-the-ground resource management. Assessment of the quality and condition of plant communities and the occurrence of rare plant and animal species allowed us to categorize twenty-four wetland sites based on conservation intent.
    [Show full text]
  • F. Key to Abies Lasiocarpa Habitat Types
    F. Key to Abies lasiocarpa habitat types 1. Equisetum arvense abundant PICEA ENGELMANNII/EQUISETUN ARVENSE h.t. (p.36) 1. E. arvense not abundant 2 2. Caltha leptosepala common or Trollius laxus well represented PICEA ENGELMANNII/CALTHA LEPTOSEPALA h.t. (p.37) 2. ~. leptosepala scarce and!. laxus poorly represented 3 3. Carex disperma well represented PICEA ENGELMANNII/CAREX DISPERMA h.t. (p.38) 3. ~. disperma poorly represented. 4 4. Calamagrostis canadensis or Ledum glandulosum well represented ABIES LASIOCARPA/CALAMAGROSTIS CANADENSIS h.t. (p.4S) 4a. Ledum glandulosum well represented LEDUM GLANDULOSUM phase* (p.4S) 4b. Not as above; Vaccinium caespitosum common VACCINIUM CAESPITOSUM phase* (p.4S) 4c. Not as above in 4a or 4b CALAMAGROSTIS CANADENSIS phase (p.4S) 4. C. canadensis and L. glandulosum poorly represented 5 5. Streptopus amplexifolius or Senecio triangularis well represented either separately or collectively ABIES LASIOCARPA/STREPTOPUS AMPLEXIFOLIUS h. t.* (p.46) 5. Not as above 6 6. Menziesia ferruginea well represented ABIES LASIOCARPA/MENZIESIA FERRUGINEA h.t.* (p.47) 6. ~. ferruginea poorly represented 7 7. Actaea rubra common ABIES LASIOCARPA/ACTAEA RUBRA h.t. (p.47) 7. A. rubra scarce 8 8. Physocarpus malvaceus well represented ABIES LASIOCARPA/PHYSOCARPUS ~1ALVACEUS h.t. (p.48) 8. ~. malvaceus poorly represented 9 9. Acer glabrum or Sorbus scopulina well represented either separately or collectively ABIES LASIOCARPA/ACER GLABRUM h.t. (p.48) 9. Not as above . 10 10. Linnaea borealis common ABIES LASIOCARPA/LINNAEA BOREALIS h.t. (p.49) lOa. Vaccinium scoparium well represented VACCINIUM SCOPARIl~ phase (p.49) lOb. ~. scoparium poorly represented LINNAEA BOREALIS phase (p.49) 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant List Whatcom County Whatcom County. Whatcom County, WA
    Vascular Plant List Whatcom County Whatcom County. Whatcom County, WA. List covers plants found in Whatcom County. Combination of plant lists of areas within Whatcom County, made by various observers over several years, with numerous additions by Jim Duemmel. Plants collected in Whatcom County found in the UW and WSU herbariums have been added to the list. 1175 spp., 223 introduced. Prepared by Don Knoke 2004. These lists represent the work of different WNPS members over the years. Their accuracy has not been verified by the Washington Native Plant Society. We offer these lists to individuals as a tool to enhance the enjoyment and study of native plants. * - Introduced Scientific Name Common Name Family Name Abies amabilis Pacific silver fir Pinaceae Abies grandis Grand fir Pinaceae Abies lasiocarpa Sub-alpine fir Pinaceae Abies procera Noble fir Pinaceae Acer circinatum Vine maple Aceraceae Acer glabrum Douglas maple Aceraceae Acer macrophyllum Big-leaf maple Aceraceae Achillea millefolium Yarrow Asteraceae Achlys triphylla Vanilla leaf Berberidaceae Aconitum columbianum Monkshood Ranunculaceae Actaea rubra Baneberry Ranunculaceae Adenocaulon bicolor Pathfinder Asteraceae Adiantum pedatum Maidenhair fern Polypodiaceae Agoseris aurantiaca Orange agoseris Asteraceae Agoseris glauca Mountain agoseris Asteraceae Agropyron caninum Bearded wheatgrass Poaceae Agropyron repens* Quack grass Poaceae Agropyron spicatum Blue-bunch wheatgrass Poaceae Agrostemma githago* Common corncockle Caryophyllaceae Agrostis alba* Red top Poaceae Agrostis exarata*
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings-Symposium on Whitebark Pine Ecosystems
    Whitebark pine community types and their patterns on the landscape Authors: Stephen F. Arno and Tad Weaver This is a published article that originally appeared in Proceedings - Symposium on whitebark pine ecosystems: ecology and management of a high mountain resource, USDA Forest Service General Tech Report INT-270 in 1990. The final version can be found at https://doi.org/10.2737/ INT-GTR-270. S Arno and T Weaver 1990. Whitebark pine community types and their patterns on the landscape. p97-105. Schmidt, Wyman C.; McDonald, Kathy J., compilers. 1990. Proceedings - Symposium on whitebark pine ecosystems: Ecology and management of a high-mountain resource; 1989 March 29-31; Bozeman, MT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-270. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 386 p. Made available through Montana State University’s ScholarWorks scholarworks.montana.edu WHITEBARK PINE COMMUNITY TYPES AND THEIR PATTERNS ON THE LANDSCAPE Stephen F. Arno Tad Weaver ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Within whitebark pine's (Pinus albicaulis) relatively Whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis) is a prominent spe­ narrow zone ofoccurrence-the highest elevations of tree cies in the upper subalpine forest and timberline zones on growth from California and Wyoming north to British high mountains of western North America. Here, a great Columbia and Alberta-this species is a member ofdiverse variety of tree-dominated and nonarboreal communities plant communities. This paper summarizes studies from form a complex vegetational mosaic on the rugged land­ throughout its distribution that have described community scape. While few studies have provided detailed descrip­ types containing whitebark pine and the habitat types tions of these communities or the causes of their distribu­ (environmental types based on potential vegetation) it tional patterns, it is possible to list the major community occupies.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterton Lakes National Park • Common Name(Order Family Genus Species)
    Waterton Lakes National Park Flora • Common Name(Order Family Genus species) Monocotyledons • Arrow-grass, Marsh (Najadales Juncaginaceae Triglochin palustris) • Arrow-grass, Seaside (Najadales Juncaginaceae Triglochin maritima) • Arrowhead, Northern (Alismatales Alismataceae Sagittaria cuneata) • Asphodel, Sticky False (Liliales Liliaceae Triantha glutinosa) • Barley, Foxtail (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Hordeum jubatum) • Bear-grass (Liliales Liliaceae Xerophyllum tenax) • Bentgrass, Alpine (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Podagrostis humilis) • Bentgrass, Creeping (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Agrostis stolonifera) • Bentgrass, Green (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Calamagrostis stricta) • Bentgrass, Spike (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Agrostis exarata) • Bluegrass, Alpine (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa alpina) • Bluegrass, Annual (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa annua) • Bluegrass, Arctic (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa arctica) • Bluegrass, Plains (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa arida) • Bluegrass, Bulbous (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa bulbosa) • Bluegrass, Canada (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa compressa) • Bluegrass, Cusick's (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa cusickii) • Bluegrass, Fendler's (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa fendleriana) • Bluegrass, Glaucous (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa glauca) • Bluegrass, Inland (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa interior) • Bluegrass, Fowl (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa palustris) • Bluegrass, Patterson's (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa pattersonii) • Bluegrass, Kentucky (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa pratensis) • Bluegrass, Sandberg's (Poales
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Washington Plant List
    The NatureMapping Program Revised: 9/15/2011 Eastern Washington Plant List - Scientific Name 1- Non- native, 2- ID Scientific Name Common Name Plant Family Invasive √ 1141 Abies amabilis Pacific silver fir Pinaceae 1 Abies grandis Grand fir Pinaceae 1142 Abies lasiocarpa Sub-alpine fir Pinaceae 762 Abronia mellifera White sand verbena Nyctaginaceae 1143 Abronia umbellata Pink sandverbena Nyctaginaceae 763 Acer glabrum Douglas maple Aceraceae 3 Acer macrophyllum Big-leaf maple Aceraceae 470 Acer platinoides* Norway maple Aceraceae 1 5 Achillea millifolium Yarrow Asteraceae 1144 Aconitum columbianum Monkshood Ranunculaceae 8 Actaea rubra Baneberry Ranunculaceae 9 Adenocaulon bicolor Pathfinder Asteraceae 10 Adiantum pedatum Maidenhair fern Polypodiaceae 764 Agastache urticifolia Nettle-leaf horse-mint Lamiaceae 1145 Agoseris aurantiaca Orange agoseris Asteraceae 1146 Agoseris elata Tall agoseris Asteraceae 705 Agoseris glauca Mountain agoseris Asteraceae 608 Agoseris grandiflora Large-flowered agoseris Asteraceae 716 Agoseris heterophylla Annual agoseris Asteraceae 11 Agropyron caninum Bearded wheatgrass Poaceae 560 Agropyron cristatum* Crested wheatgrass Poaceae 1 1147 Agropyron dasytachyum Thickspike wheatgrass Poaceae 739 Agropyron intermedium* Intermediate ryegrass Poaceae 1 12 Agropyron repens* Quack grass Poaceae 1 744 Agropyron smithii Bluestem Poaceae 523 Agropyron spicatum Blue-bunch wheatgrass Poaceae 687 Agropyron trachycaulum Slender wheatgrass Poaceae 13 Agrostis alba* Red top Poaceae 1 799 Agrostis exarata* Spike bentgrass
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Association and Mountain Hemlock Zone
    USDA United States Department of Plant Association and Agriculture Forest Service Management Guide for the Pacific Northwest Region Mountain Hemlock Zone Ro-MTH-GP-TP-08-95 June 1997 Gifford Pinchot and Mt. Hood National Forests A. Tsuga mertensiana Mountain Hemlock Cover drawing by Jeanne R. Janish, from Vascular Plants of the Pacic Northwest, C. Leo Hitchcock, Arthur Cronquist, Marion Ownbey and J.W. Thompson, 1969, University of Washington Press. Used by permission. United States Department of Plant Association and Agriculture Forest Service Management Guide for the Pacific Northwest Mountain Hemlock Zone Region R6-MTH-GP-TP-O8-95 June 1997 Gifford Pinchot and Mt. Hood National Forests By Nancy M. Diaz C. Tom High T. Kim Mellen Diane E. Smith Christopher Topik TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 Objectives: Why We Classifj Plant Associations METHODS 2 Sample Design and Data Collection 2 Data Analysis 3 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 5 Climate 5 Landforms 6 Soils 6 Parent Materials 6 Soil/Organism Interactions 8 Time 8 Podsolization 9 Summary 9 Soil Management Considerations 9 Recreation Impacts 11 VEGETATION ECOLOGY/PRODUCTIVITY ANt) STAND STRUCTURE 13 Vegetation Ecology 13 Tree Productivity 15 Stand Structure and Seral Stage 16 Snags and Down Wood 21 WILDLIFE HABITAT RELATIONSHIPS 25 PLANT ASSOCIATION DESCRIPTIONS 27 Key to Forest Series 27 Key to Mountain Hemlock Zone Plant Associations 30 Association Descriptions Mt. Hemlock-Subalpine Fir/Cascade Aster (T SME-ABLA2/ASLE2) 39 Mt. Hemlock-Subalpine Fir/Green Fescue (TSME-ABLA2/FEVI) 43 Mt. Hemlock-Subalpine Fir/Mt. Juniper (TSME-ABLA2/JUCO4) 47 Mt. Hemlock-Subalpine Fir/Newberry Knotweed (TSME-ABLA2/PONE4).
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Hemlock
    Tsuga mertensiana (Bong.) Carr. Mountain Hemlock Pinaceae Pine family Joseph E. Means Mountain hemlock (Tsuga mertensiana) is usually found on cold, snowy subalpine sites where it grows slowly, sometimes attaining more than 800 years in age. Arborescent individuals that have narrowly con- ical crowns until old age (300 to 400 years) and shrubby krummholz on cold, windy sites near tim- berline add beauty to mountain landscapes. Taylor and Taylor (76) thoroughly describe its form. Uses of its moderately strong, light-colored wood include small-dimension lumber and pulp. Habitat Native Range Mountain hemlock (fig. 1) grows from Sequoia Na- tional Park in California (lat. 36° 38 N.) (62) to Cook Inlet in Alaska (lat. 61° 25 N.) (83). It grows along the crest of the Sierra Nevada in California (31); the Cascade Range in Oregon; the Cascade Range and Olympic Mountains in Washington; the northern Rocky Mountains in Idaho and western Montana; the Insular, Coast, and Columbia Mountains in British Columbia; and in southeast and south-central Alaska. Climate Areas occupied by mountain hemlock (fig. 2) generally have a cool to cold maritime climate that includes mild to cold winters, a short, warm to cool growing season and moderate to high precipitation (table 1). Annual and summer precipitation and the proportion of precipitation as snow show notable latitudinal climatic trends in the range of mountain hemlock (table 1). Latitudinal trends in mean temperatures are not evident. The high snowfall results in snowpacks with max- imum depths that range from 245 cm (96 in) in Idaho to 380 cm (150 in) in British Columbia (9).
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying Plant Community Change at Waterton Lakes National Park Over the Past 25 Years
    QUANTIFYING PLANT COMMUNITY CHANGE AT WATERTON LAKES NATIONAL PARK OVER THE PAST 25 YEARS JED IMMANUEL LLOREN Bachelor of Science Honours, Carleton University, 2018 A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES Department of Biological Sciences University of Lethbridge LETHBRIDGE, ALBERTA, CANADA © Jed Immanuel Lloren, 2021 QUANTIFYING PLANT COMMUNITY CHANGE AT WATERTON LAKES NATIONAL PARK OVER THE PAST 25 YEARS JED IMMANUEL LLOREN Date of Defence: June 15, 2021 Dr. J.L. McCune Assistant Professor PhD Thesis Supervisor Dr. L. Flanagan Professor PhD Thesis Examination Committee Member Dr. E. Schultz Professor PhD Thesis Examination Committee Member Dr. L. Chasmer Assistant Professor PhD Thesis Examination Committee Member Dr. R. Laird Associate Professor PhD Chair, Thesis Examination Committee DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to those that battle with mental illness. May you find the strength within yourself to keep pushing forward and achieve everything you desire. iii ABSTRACT Plant communities are changing in response to natural and anthropogenic drivers. However, we know little about how different drivers have affected Rocky Mountain plant communities over the past few decades. In 2017, a wildfire burned 50% of the vegetation at Waterton Lakes National Park, located in Canada’s southern Rocky Mountains. Using re-surveys of vegetation plots established in the 1990s, I quantified changes in plant community diversity and composition over the past two decades. I found that fire severity interacted with human disturbance to affect species richness and community composition. I also found that burned and unburned plots are experiencing diverging trajectories.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of the North Cascades Conservation Council June, 1993
    The Wild Cascades THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH CASCADES CONSERVATION COUNCIL JUNE, 1993 Pasayten scenes — Harvey Manning The Wild Cascades The Wild Cascades - June 1993 Editor: Betty Manning The Wild Cascades is published three times a year (February, June, and October). In This Issue NCCC members receive this journal. The North Cascades Conservation Council was formed in 1957 'To protect President's Message and preserve the North Cascades' scenic, scientific, recreational, educational, and 3 wilderness values." Continuing this mission, NCCC keeps government NCCC Board Members Meet with Stehekin Residents officials, environmental organizations, 4 and the general public informed about issues affecting the Greater North News Update Cascades Ecosystem. Action is pursued 6 through legislative, legal, and public participation channels to protect the lands, Update on Litigation Proceedings waters, plants and wildlife. 11 Over the past third of a century the NCCC has led or participated in campaigns to create the North Cascades National Park Stehekin Valley Road Repair Complex, Glacier Peak Wilderness, and 12 other units of the National Wilderness System from the W. O. Douglas Stehekin Myths Wilderness north to the Alpine Lakes 14 Wilderness, the Henry M. Jackson Wilderness, the Chelan-Sawtooth Ancient Forests - An Essay on Solving the Present Wilderness and others. Among its most dramatic victories has been working with Impasse — A.B. Adams 16 British Columbia allies to block the raising of Ross Dam, which would have drowned Big Beaver Valley. Joe and Margaret Miller Honored 19 The NCCC is supported by member dues and private donations. These support publication of The Wild Cascades and Are We Chicken About Grizzlies? lobbying activities.
    [Show full text]