Gestalt Therapy Gestalt Therapy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gestalt Therapy Gestalt Therapy Quotation GESTALT • "I am not in this world to live up to other people's expectations, nor do I THERAPY feel that the world must live up to mine." --Fritz Perls Psychology 460 Counseling and Interviewing Sheila K. Grant, Ph.D. 1 2 Theory of Personality Gestalt • A person exists by differentiating self from • A gestalt, or whole, both includes & other & by connecting self & other transcends the sum of its parts • These are the two functions of a boundary • It cannot be understood simply as a sum • The boundary between self & of smaller, independent events environment must be permeable to allow • It is chiefly that distinctive emphasis on for exchanges, yet firm enough to enable looking to the whole for the meaning of autonomous action the parts that unites a group of theorists • When the boundary becomes unclear, into what is called the Gestalt school of lost, or impermeable, mental & emotional psychology disturbance results 3 4 Gestalt Therapy Gestalt Therapy • Fritz Perls (1893-1970) / wife Laura Perls (1905-1990) • Existential & Phenomenological – it is – Main originator & developer of Gestalt Therapy grounded in the client’s “here and now” • Gestalt therapy • Initial goal is for clients to gain awareness – an existential/phenomenological approach of what they are experiencing & doing now • Therapists try to increase clients’ awareness – Promotes direct experiencing rather than the • Clients are expected to do their own seeing, abstractness of talking about situations feeling, sensing, & interpreting – Rather than talk about a childhood trauma the client is encouraged to become the hurt child 5 6 1 Gestalt Therapy - Gestalt Therapy - An Overview An Overview • Gestalt Therapy is another type of counseling that is based upon the – 3. Existential—The person is to take existential framework. Key elements responsibility for their destiny and identity include: • The client is also encouraged to work in the “here and now,” not in the “there and then” – 1. A Phenomenological Basis—You are seeking to focus on the client’s perception – 4. Awareness—A key element in this of reality theory is helping the client come to an awareness of what he or she is doing and – 2. Experiential—The client is being asked experiencing to come to understand about what and how • This involves dropping those behaviors and they are thinking, feeling, and doing as they barriers that would stop someone from interact with the therapist and the other experience one’s self people in the world 7 8 Gestalt Therapy - A Gestalt View of An Overview Human Nature • Experiments—The • Gestalt’s basic understanding of the human therapist designs being is that people can deal with their experiments to problems, especially if they become fully increase the client’s aware of what is happening within oneself and outside of oneself awareness of what he or she is doing, experiencing, and how • Change happens in a person’s life when he or she is doing it. he or she can reintegrate a disowned part of the self back into the mix of identity – A disowned part of the self is something that 9 may conflict with how one perceives the self 10 A Gestalt View of A Gestalt View of Human Nature Human Nature • Problems begin when a person tries to be • Gestalt is a process of “reowning” parts of the self who or what he or she isn’t that have been disowned – Living with “masks” and being inauthentic does – This unification process leads to the goal of becoming strong enough to proceed with one’s own personal not promote change growth – In fact it promotes stagnation of the personality • Client needs to be in their current position and be aware of what they are, as opposed to trying to • According to Gestalt, the more a person become what they are not tries to be who they are not, the more • Change takes place when a person is more they stay the same aware of who and what he or she is – Once that is accepted, change towards a goal can take 11 place 12 2 The Now The Now • Our “power is in the present” • Therapist will focus on the “what” & “how” • The only moment that is significant is the of a person without asking the “why” present questions – Nothing exists except the “now” – This is to promote an awareness of the – The past is gone and the future has not yet arrived moment • To be fully aware is to live in the here & now – Questions such as “What is happening now?” or – By reliving the past or worrying about the future, a person “What are you feeling in this moment?” are used cannot be authentic and cannot come to terms with who to intensify the experience of the present & one is create awareness • For many people the power of the present is lost • “Why” questions lead only toward – They may focus on their past mistakes or engage in rationalizations and “self-deceptions” away endless resolutions and plans for the future 13 from the immediacy of the moment 14 The Now The Now • Therapist encourages the present time by • Therapist is asking the client to: seeking to help a – Bring the past into the present by re- person live their enacting it in the present feelings rather than talk about – e.g., imagine your father across from you in them chair and tell him how you feel when he ignores you? • To live the moment rather than describe it in a detached way 15 16 The Now Unfinished Business • The past is recognized as having an • Feelings about the past are unexpressed important influence on a person’s present – e.g., resentment, rage, hatred, pain, anxiety, grief, attitudes and behavior guilt, abandonment – These feelings are associated with distinct memories & – But what is in the past is either brought fantasies into the here and now (“As you talk about – Feelings not fully experienced linger in the this issue, what are your feeling now?”) so background & interfere with effective contact that a client can experience the feelings….. • Result: – OR – Preoccupation, compulsive behavior, wariness oppressive energy & self-defeating behavior – Unexpressed feelings can result in physical symptoms 17 – So Gestalt therapists emphasize paying attention to 18 the bodily experience 3 Process of Contact and Psychotherapy Resistances to Contact • CONTACT – interacting with nature and with other people • Goal of Gestalt psychotherapy is awareness without losing one’s individuality • RESISTANCE TO CONTACT – the defenses we develop to • Gestalt therapists do whatever is prevent us from experiencing the present fully necessary to jolt the person into a higher • Five major channels of resistance (i.e., styles of resisting contact): level of awareness of self, environment, & – Introjection (we passively incorporate what the environment provides relationship with others & do not know what we want or need) – Projection (we disown certain aspects of ourselves by assigning them • Contact Cycle involves increasing awareness to the environment; so we put them on others; e.g., see quality in others, we avoid responsibility for who we are) which leads to excitement which leads to – Confluence (a blurring of the differentiation between the self and the contact & action environment; e.g., high need to be accepted & liked) – Retroflection (is turning back to ourselves what we would like – Increase awareness-->excitement-->contact-->action someone else do to us; e.g., lash out & injure self because fearful of directing toward others) 19 – Deflection (distracting so that it is difficult to maintain a sustained 20 sense of contact Energy & Layers of Neurosis Blocks to Energy • The phony: • Special attention is given to – reacting to others in stereotypical and inauthentic ways – where energy is located, • Phobic layer: – how it is used, – avoid the emotional pain that we would prefer to deny • The impasse: – how it can be blocked – the point where we are stuck in our own maturation; w • Clients & therapist want to be aware of – we think we will not be able to survive the resistance which is being expressed in • The implosive level: their body – fully experience our deadness instead of denying it. • The explosive layer: – letting go of our phony roles & pretenses which release much energy that we have been holding in 21 22 Therapeutic Process Therapeutic Process • Therapeutic Goals • Therapist's Function and Role – Move towards increased awareness of themselves – Therapists notice what is in the foreground and the background. – Gradually assume ownership of their experience – Pay attention to the client's body language. – Develop skills and acquire values that will allow them to satisfy their needs without violating the rights of – Focus on the language others • "it" talk - client says it instead of I – Become more aware of all of their senses • "you" talk - client is asked to use I to make it more specific to the client – Learn to accept responsibility for what they do, • questions - this can hide the client including accepting the consequences of their actions • language that denies power - by adding qualifiers or – Move from outside support toward increasing internal disclaimers (i.e. "but", "I guess") support • listening to a client's metaphors - can clue into the client's – Be able to ask for and get help from others and to internal struggle give to others • listening for language that uncovers a story - because you 23 can get an idea of their struggles 24 4 Therapeutic Process Therapeutic Process • Client's Experience in Therapy • Relationship Between Therapist and – They are active participants who make their Client own interpretations & meaning – Therapists need to allow themselves to be – Discovery: new view of
Recommended publications
  • Attachment Styles and Use of Defense Mechanisms: a Study of the Adult Attachment Projective and Cramer's Defense Mechanism Scale
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-2006 Attachment Styles and Use of Defense Mechanisms: A Study of the Adult Attachment Projective and Cramer's Defense Mechanism Scale Paul Matthew Hoffman University of Tennessee, Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Hoffman, Paul Matthew, "Attachment Styles and Use of Defense Mechanisms: A Study of the Adult Attachment Projective and Cramer's Defense Mechanism Scale. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2006. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4254 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Paul Matthew Hoffman entitled "Attachment Styles and Use of Defense Mechanisms: A Study of the Adult Attachment Projective and Cramer's Defense Mechanism Scale." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Philosophy. Leonard Handler, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend
    [Show full text]
  • Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy: the Case of Stan and Lecturettes
    chapter 8 Gestalt Therapy introduction t 5IF3PMFPG$POGSPOUBUJPO key concepts t (FTUBMU5IFSBQZ*OUFSWFOUJPOT t "QQMJDBUJPOUP(SPVQ$PVOTFMJOH t 7JFXPG)VNBO/BUVSF gestalt therapy from a t 4PNF1SJODJQMFTPG(FTUBMU5IFSBQZ5IFPSZ multicultural perspective t 5IF/PX t 6OmOJTIFE#VTJOFTT t 4USFOHUIT'SPNB%JWFSTJUZ1FSTQFDUJWF t $POUBDUBOE3FTJTUBODFTUP $POUBDU t 4IPSUDPNJOHT'SPNB%JWFSTJUZ1FSTQFDUJWF t &OFSHZ BOE#MPDLTUP&OFSHZ gestalt therapy applied the therapeutic process to the case of stan t 5IFSBQFVUJD(PBMT summary and evaluation t 5IFSBQJTUT'VODUJPOBOE3PMF t 4VNNBSZ t $MJFOUT&YQFSJFODFJO5IFSBQZ t $POUSJCVUJPOTPG(FTUBMU5IFSBQZ t 3FMBUJPOTIJQ#FUXFFO5IFSBQJTUBOE$MJFOU5IFS t -JNJUBUJPOTBOE$SJUJDJTNTPG(FTUBMU5IFSBQZ application: therapeutictherape where to go from here techniques and proceduresproc t 3FDPNNFOEFE4VQQMFNFOUBSZ3FBEJOHT tt 5IF&YQFSJNFOUJO(FTUBMU5IFSBQZ5 IF &YQFSJNFO t 3FGFSFODFTBOE4VHHFTUFE3FBEJOHT tt 1SFQBSJO1SFQBSJOH$MJFOUTGPS(FTUBMU&YQFSJNFOUT$MJFOUT GPS (FTUBMU &Y 210 Copyright 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it. Fritz Perls / LAURA PERLS FREDERICK S. (“FRITZ”) PERLS, MD, PhD Perls and several of his colleagues established (1893–1970), was the main originator and devel- the New York Institute for Gestalt Therapy in 1952. oper of Gestalt therapy. Born in Berlin, Germany, Eventually Fritz left New York and settled in Big into a lower-middle-class Jewish family, he later Sur, California, where he conducted workshops and identified himself as a source of much trouble for seminars at the Esalen Institute, carving out his his parents.
    [Show full text]
  • The Self, the ®Eld and the Either-Or
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPHY, VOL. 5, NO. 3, 2000 219 The self, the ® eld and the either-or JOHN ROWAN 70 Kings Head Hill, North Chingford, London N4 7LY, UK Abstract It has become fashionable both in psychoanalytic and in humanistic circles to talk about dialogue, the interpersonal ® eld, language and the socially constructed self, and to say that the old idea of the self as central, as real, as essence, is outdated and even patriarchal. But there is something strange about this. In discovering the ® eld (which perhaps we could liken to the wave function in physics) and in denying the individual (which perhaps we could liken to the particle) many people seem to be denying or ignoring the principle of complementarity. The whole point about the authentic self is that it can relate authentically. I see no contradiction between saying that and saying that authentic selves in relation form a ® eld, which has to be respected in its own right. Ken Wilber uses the idea (taken from Arthur Koestler) of a holon. A holon is a unit which is also a part of other units. Holons as a whole form a ® eld, within which are numbers of sub-® elds. In this way we can see how a holon can be regarded at one and the same time as a separable unit and as part of a larger ® eld. There is nothing dif® cult about this. We don’t have to give up one in order to have the other. It has become fashionable to talk about dialogue, the interpersonal ® eld, language and the socially constructed self.
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneering Cultural Initiatives by Esalen Centers for Theory
    Esalen’s Half-Century of Pioneering Cultural Initiatives 1962 to 2012 For more information, please contact: Jane Hartford, Director of Development Center for Theory & Research and Special Projects Special Assistant to the Cofounder and Chairman Emeritus Michael Murphy Esalen Institute 1001 Bridgeway #247 Sausalito, CA 94965 415-459-5438 i Preface Most of us know Esalen mainly through public workshops advertised in the catalog. But there is another, usually quieter, Esalen that’s by invitation only: the hundreds of private initiatives sponsored now by Esalen’s Center for Theory and Research (CTR). Though not well publicized, this other Esalen has had a major impact on America and the world at large. From its programs in citizen diplomacy to its pioneering role in holistic health; from physics and philosophy to psychology, education and religion, Esalen has exercised a significant influence on our culture and society. CTR sponsors work in fields that think tanks and universities typically ignore, either because those fields are too controversial, too new, or because they fall between disciplinary silos. These initiatives have included diplomats and political leaders, such as Joseph Montville, the influential pioneer of citizen diplomacy, Jack Matlock and Arthur Hartman, former Ambassadors to the Soviet Union, and Claiborne Pell, former Chairman of the U.S. Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee; eminent Russian cultural leaders Vladimir Pozner, Sergei Kapitsa, and Victor Erofeyev; astronaut Rusty Schweickart; philosophers Jay Ogilvy, Sam
    [Show full text]
  • Introjection and Dissociative Identity Disorder: a Case Report
    Journal of Psychology and Clinical Psychiatry Case Report Open Access Introjection and dissociative identity disorder: a case report Abstract Volume 8 Issue 1 - 2020 Background: We wish to add to the current body of knowledge by investigating the George Letterio,1 Karlyle Bistas,1 Emmanuel different factors that play into the development of dissociative identity disorder, particularly Katehis,2 Puja Patel,2 Heela Azizi,2 Ayodeji trauma. DID in accordance with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 3 5th edition (DSM-5) is defined as a disruption in the identity by the presence of two or Jolayemi 1 more distinct personality states, which often occurs after significant trauma. Ferenzci’s Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of the Americas, Interfaith Medical Center, USA explored this with the theory on trauma-inducing neurosis. This theory was applied to our 2Department of Psychiatry, American University of Antigua case presentation. College of Medicine, Interfaith Medical Center, USA Case presentation: We present a 19-year-old female patient who presented with active 3Department of Psychiatry, Interfaith Medical Center, USA shifting of personalities was visualized in the clinical setting. This patient had experienced various forms of traumatic abuse, including sexual, verbal, physical, and even neglectful Correspondence: George Letterio, Medical University of the Americas, Department of Psychiatry, Interfaith Medical Center, abuse from multiple family members. The patient developed dissociative states in which Brooklyn, New York, USA, Tel (905)-902-7191, characteristics of the aggressors were mimicked. Email Conclusion: Ferenzci’s idea that traumatic situations likely trigger dissociative states March 31, 2020 | April 21, 2020 during the early years in this patient was noticed in ⅗ personalities, while did not Received: Published: support this claim.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sabotaging of Introjects: Thoughts About Processing Introjects in Gestalt Therapy in a Changing Culture Hans Peter Dreitzel, Phd [email protected]
    The Sabotaging of Introjects: Thoughts about Processing Introjects in Gestalt Therapy in a Changing Culture Hans Peter Dreitzel, PhD [email protected] ABSTRACT: This article presents a clarification of the significance of the concepts of introjection and introject in Gestalt therapy and some suggestions as to how they can be processed in therapy. The author presents the thesis that the “royal road” to processing the natural but unconscious sabotage of introjections is to support them therapeutically. Based on some sociological observations about the present state of our Western civilization, he emphasizes the importance of differentiating between neurotic introjections and healthy internalizations. Keywords: introjection, introject, internalization, values, standards of civilization I. The Difference between Introjection and Assimilation Introjection and projection are the two terms of the contacting process that the founders of Gestalt therapy adopted from Freudian psychoanalysis, in which they were originally trained. They integrated them into the theoretical framework of their new form of psychotherapy using them for defining two types of interrupting the contacting process between individuals and their environments. In the Gestalt approach neurotic contact interruptions were seen as processes that occur at the contact boundary. Perls, Hefferline, and Goodman (1994, 32–35; hereafter PHG) focus at first on the process of introjection rather than on its result, the introjects. The basic idea is that the human organism, which is always embedded in its environment and dependent on exchange with that environment, has to take into itself material objects (e.g., food) and symbolic objects (e.g., language) if it wants to survive. If this process of incorporation is to lead to an enrichment and strengthening of the psychophysical organism, that is, if it is to be assimilated, it must involve the destruction of the gestalt of the object encountered.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Roots of Gestalt Therapy Theory
    The Historical Roots of Gestalt Therapy Theory Rosemarie Wulf The theory of Gestalt therapy is itself a new Gestalt, though it does not contain many new thoughts. What its founders, Fritz and Laura Perls and Paul Goodman, did was to weave a new synthesis out of existing concepts. The background of this new Gestalt is composed of concepts and elements from different bodies of knowledge and disciplines. I would like to give you an idea of the cultural and historical situation that is the Zeitgeist (the spirit of the time) that prevailed during the lifetimes of the founders of Gestalt therapy. What kind of theories and traditions did Fritz and Laura come into contact with? Where did they find ideas that were in line with their own, what other ideas did they reject in their search for answers to the fundamental questions that are either implicitly or explicitly contained in every theory of psychotherapy? What is a human being? How does he or she function? Why do we exist? Is there a reason to exist? How should we behave toward each other? How does psychological illness develop? Firstly the background: the wider field, an overview of the Zeitgeist. In the second part, I will present the various contacts Fritz and Laura Perls had with specific persons and their ideas or theoretical models. The beginning of the 20th century was characterized by an explosive development of science and technology. The era of automation and cybernetics had begun. The rise of nuclear and quantum physics led to radical revolutionary change. Biology, chemistry and medicine also began to make rapid progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a More Deeply Embodied Approach in Gestalt Therapy 1
    Studies in Gestalt Therapy 2(2), 43-56 James I. Kepner Towards a More Deeply Embodied Approach in Gestalt Therapy 1 This article critiques and assesses the development of body-oriented work in gestalt therapy. Strengths of the gestalt therapy approach are highlighted as work with the "actual," and holding an integral viewpoint. The author criti­ ques limitations in the field involving a narrow epistemology of the founding perspective, the inadequacy of awareness alone for psychophysical change, the inclusion of structural concepts, and the need for physical methodology including touch and movement and other somatic methods. A brief model is offered for appreciating the multi-level complexity of a more fully embodied approach. Key words: Body-oriented work, gestalt therapy, epistemology, gestalt therapy training, non-dualistic approach, self, organism/ environment field, figure/ ground, structured ground, awareness, patterns and organization, developmental theory. Borfy Process: A Gestalt Approach to Working With the Borfy in P.rychotherapy (Kepner, 1987) was published 21 years ago. The book was my attempt to articulate a fuller body-oriented psychotherapy from the gestalt therapy ap­ proach. Gestalt therapy certainly had interest in body process and experience but, up to that time, the actual methodology for body-oriented practice was very limited. I found the ways in which gestalt therapists utilized more inten­ sive body therapeutic techniques to be a kind of grafting of often incompati­ ble methods or approaches onto gestalt therapy technique. This often re­ sulted in an unintegrated hodge-podge. As a "Young Turk" at the brash age of 34, I also had the motivation to "correct" my elders and teachers in the gestalt therapy world who, I thought, did not go far enough in working with the body.
    [Show full text]
  • Ericksonian Hypnosis and the Enneagram About Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP)
    The Changeworks Consulting, Training, Books and CDs Workshops with Thomas Condon PO Box 5909, Bend, OR 97708 001-541-382-1894 email: [email protected] http://www.thechangeworks.com Ericksonian Hypnosis and the Enneagram About Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP) NLP is a set of distinctions and techniques for altering the structure of subjective experience. Created in the 1970’s by Richard Bandler and John Grinder, NLP is based in linguistics, psychology and communication. Among other things it offers a model of good communication and good rapport. It has had extensive applications in the fields of business, education, training and health, as well as in therapeutic changework. NLP is based upon the premise that experience has structure, and that by altering the structure, you can alter the experience. NLP helps you analyze how you create your subjective experience through your senses. At any given moment, your internal experience has a visual part - what you see around you or in your mind’s eye; an auditory part - hearing the sounds in your environment or listening to internal voices; and a kinesthetic part - your emotions and body feelings. As you experience the world through your five senses, you interpret the information and then act on it. In broad strokes, NLP helps you recognize your primary sensory modality – whether you are generally visual or auditory or kinesthetic or favor a combination of those primary senses. Nobody is really purely auditory, visual or kinesthetic, but you might find that you have a favorite orientation. Once you’ve determined your existing sensory bias, NLP offers techniques to expand your experience of your other senses.
    [Show full text]
  • Benefits, Limitations, and Potential Harm in Psychodrama
    Benefits, Limitations, and Potential Harm in Psychodrama (Training) © Copyright 2005, 2008, 2010, 2013, 2016 Rob Pramann, PhD, ABPP (Group Psychology) CCCU Training in Psychodrama, Sociometry, and Group Psychotherapy This article began in 2005 in response to a new question posed by the Utah chapter of NASW on their application for CEU endorsement. “If any speaker or session is presenting a fairly new, non-traditional or alternative approach, please describe the limitations, risks and/or benefits of the methods taught.” After documenting how Psychodrama is not a fairly new, non-traditional or alternative approach I wrote the following. I have made minor updates to it several times since. As a result of the encouragement, endorsement, and submission of it by a colleague it is listed in the online bibliography of psychodrama http://pdbib.org/. It is relevant to my approach to the education/training/supervision of Group Psychologists and the delivery of Group Psychology services. It is not a surprise that questions would be raised about the benefits, limitations, and potential harm of Psychodrama. J.L. Moreno (1989 – 1974) first conducted a psychodramatic session on April 1, 1921. It was but the next step in the evolution of his philosophical and theological interests. His approach continued to evolve during his lifetime. To him, creativity and (responsible) spontaneity were central. He never wrote a systematic overview of his approach and often mixed autobiographical and poetic material in with his discussion of his approach. He was a colorful figure and not afraid of controversy (Blatner, 2000). He was a prolific writer and seminal thinker.
    [Show full text]
  • Depressive and Self-Defeating Personalities
    Depressive and Self-Defeating Patients Nancy McWilliams, PhD, ABPP Rutgers Graduate School of Applied & Professional Psychology Depressive personality does not equate with depressive illness It is a more chronic, low-grade tendency toward feeling guilty or inadequate, feelings that go with cognitions explaining painful life experiences in terms of personal malfeasance or failure. One can have a depressive personality and never have had a significant depressive episode. In fact . It appears to be the most common personality type among psychotherapists (Hyde, 2009) Depression versus normal grief: In normal grief states: In depressive episodes: There is a clear loss or rejection. The precipitant may be unclear. The world seems bad or empty. The self seems bad or empty. The painful feelings come in waves; The painful feelings are chronic and between the waves there is normal unremitting. mood. There is no sense of a capacity to improve one’s mood (cf. Seligman’s “learned helplessness”) Depressive and self-defeating personality disorders are not in the DSM or the ICD taxonomies The decision not to include them, despite evidence that depressive- masochistic personality (Kernberg, 1984) is the most common kind of personality disorder, resulted from political rather than scientific factors. The Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual, which tries to reflect both accrued clinical experience and research, does have a category for depressive personality styles and disorders, with hypomanic and self-defeating variants. Diagnosis for clinical
    [Show full text]
  • WHAT IS GESTALT THERAPY Violet Oaklander, Ph.D
    WHAT IS GESTALT THERAPY Violet Oaklander, Ph.D. Basically, Gestalt therapy is a process-oriented mode of therapy that focuses attention on the healthy, integrated functioning of the total organism comprised of the senses, the body, the emotions and the intellect. It was originally developed by Frederick (Fritz) and Laura Perls in the 1940’s and has at its base principles from psychoanalytic theory, Gestalt psychology, various humanistic theories, as well as aspects of phenomenology, existentialism and Reichian body therapy. From these sources, and others, a large body of theoretical concepts and principles have evolved underlying the practice of Gestalt therapy. A major focus is to help clients become aware of what they are doing, how they are doing it, and how they can change themselves, and at the same time, to learn to accept and value themselves. It focuses more on process than content ( though content may be used as examples of one’s process.) What is directly perceived, felt and experienced is considered more relevant than explanations and interpretations. A famous misconception is that Gestalt therapy is the empty chair technique. It is not uncommon to hear someone say, “I use Gestalt therapy all the time,” referring to this technique. It would seem ludicrous to think that I, for example, trained to be a Gestalt therapist for more than three years at the Los Angeles Gestalt Therapy Institute to learn this technique and nothing else. Moreover, there exist at this time scores of books and articles discussing the principles and concepts of Gestalt therapy. Because of the extensive, comprehensive nature of this therapy, a short summary as this could not describe the basic concepts involved.
    [Show full text]