The Period That Led to the Bauhaus Was Very Much

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Period That Led to the Bauhaus Was Very Much The period that led to the Bauhaus was very much influenced by approaches to education reform and by the pre-war arts and crafts movement, especially the progressive education movement and the concept of the Gesamtkunstwerk (total work of art). Henry van de Velde in Weimar in 1902 founded the Arts and Crafts Seminar and was the director of the School of applied arts from 1907 to 1915. The school played a significant role in the early history of the Bauhaus. Gropius had been already proposed as his successor by van der Velde in 1915.Under Henry van de Velde, the school workshops had already taken the transitional step from craftsmanship techniques to industrial technology in 1910. The discussions at the works council for art, where German intellectuals, architects and artists came together in the autumn of 1918, had another decisive influence on the pioneering programme of the Bauhaus. One work group including Walter Gropius discussed the far- reaching reform of the educational system. In the spring of 1919, it developed a mutual concept paper that served as a basis for Gropius’s concept. The artist William Morris was the founder and leader of a reform movement that aspired to counter the cultural damage caused by industrialization. Starting in 1861, he revived historic handicraft techniques in his workshops and used them to produce high quality goods such as fabrics, carpets, glass paintings, furniture and everyday objects. The wave of reform was reached to German Later, Where the industrialization had achieved a new quality in that time. Germany also recognized that well-designed industrial products represented a significant economic factor. Through analysis of British educational system, German artists and intellectuals found it was necessary to reform arts and crafts of school in German and applied arts is the most important task now. Shortly after, Walter Gropius found the Weimar State Bauhaus with the goal of overcoming division between the artisan and the artist in 1919. The employees of the Bauhaus wanted to eliminate social differences through their creative work. On 1st of April 1919. Walter Gropius became the director of the former Grand-Ducal Saxon College of Fine Arts Art School in Weimar. He united it formally with the College of Applied Art, and named it the State Bauhaus in Weimar. The school represented the spirit of awakening. Gropius then appointed as masters at the Bauhaus Weimar included Gerhard Marcks, Lyonel Feininger, Johannes Itten, Paul Klee, Oskar Schlemmer, Wassily Kandinsky and László Moholy-Nagy. In his manifesto and programme for the Weimar State Bauhaus, Walter Gropius called for a new beginning for building culture. Art should once again serve a social role, and there should no longer be a division between the crafts-based disciplines. Instead of academic theory, the Bauhaus relied on a pluralistic educational concept, on creative methods and the individual development of the students’ artistic talents. Based on the manifesto and programme, the Bauhaus masters developed a new type of teaching programme based on the preliminary course developed by the Johannes Itten, the famous theory of Paul Klee and Kandinsky and practical training in the workshops. The ultimate goal of the educational programme was collaborative work on a representative building, the ‘Synthesis of the art’, as Gropius called it, to which all the Bauhaus workshops were to contribute. Training in the workshops was preceded by the preliminary course, a trial semester where the personal skills of the students were tested and the foundations of craftsmanship and design were taught. The workshops were the core of the Bauhaus Weimar. In 1923, Walter Gropius initiated a decisive change of direction at the Bauhaus Weimar. Theo van Doesburg, a Dutch artist, member of the group De Stijl, served as a catalyst for this development, but finally this was not accepted at the Bauhaus. Between 1919 and 1923, the state government generally promoted Gropius’s plans. With the right wing party won the election. The budget for the Bauhaus was cut and the teachers’ contracts cancelled as March 1925. Then Gropius and masters resigned in December. After then Bauhaus moved to Dessau in 1925. Surprisingly, following the politically motivated closure of the Bauhaus in Weimar, the change of location to Dessau did not result in a crisis in the school. Starting with the famous Bauhaus Building designed by Walter Gropius, the majority of the products and buildings that still define the image of the Bauhaus today were created in Dessau. As an architect who had already made a reputation for himself in 1911 with the celebrated glass building for the Fagus-Werk shoe factory, Gropius was warmly welcomed by Dessau citizens. Fortunately, the Weimar masters Lyonel Feininger, Wassily Kandinsky, Paul Klee, László Moholy-Nagy, Georg Muche and Oskar Schlemmer followed Gropius to Dessau and moved into the Masters’ Houses that he had designed. It is so important for Bauhaus. From 1926, the former Weimar State Bauhaus was officially called Bauhaus – School of Design. The masters were appointed as professors. A year later, on Gropius’s recommendation, the director’s post was handed over to the Swiss architect and urbanist Hannes Meyer, previously the head of the architectural department established at the Bauhaus in 1927.But, in 1930, he was dismissed by the city council for supposed ‘communist practices’. With Ludwig Mies van der Rohe in 1930, the Bauhaus acquired its last and least politically minded director. The school’s orientation towards architecture grew under his direction. however, there was also an increasing lack of socio-political reference. The students were most affected by the ban on any type of political activity and the discontinuation of production lines. Just one year after Mies van der Rohe took office, The city decided to close the Bauhaus in Dessau on September 1932. The relocation of the school with all its equipment to an old telephone factory in Berlin, which was organised by Mies van der Rohe, was just a brief interlude that preceded its final closure on 20th July 1933. Due to the repressive political measures of the National Socialists and the drastic cutbacks in funding, only a limited amount of work was possible during the Bauhaus’s last phase in Berlin. With regular teaching activities were no longer possible, Finally It had been dissolved in April 1933. Instead, the brief and dramatic Berlin phase led many professors and students to move elsewhere in Germany or to emigrate. The move to Berlin was organized by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, who was the third Bauhaus director from 1930. In October 1931, the Bauhaus masters and students resumed their work in an abandoned telephone factory in Berlin. However, After being searched by polices, 32 students were arrested. These were unacceptable to Mies van der Rohe, the teaching staff dissolved the Bauhaus on 20th July 1933. After the dissolution of the Bauhaus in Berlin, a large number of those who taught and studied at the Bauhaus emigrated and contributed greatly to the global dissemination of the Bauhaus concept. One of the distinctive features of the Bauhaus is that it integrated a diverse range of international trends and was required to reinvent itself in consistently new contexts due to its forced relocation. Perhaps the most intensive communication and propagation of the ideas coming from the Bauhaus happened through the teachers and students even before its closure in 1933. Europe Gerhard Marcks, for example, went to the Burg Giebichenstein school of applied art in Halle in 1925. Oskar Schlemmer taught at the academy in Breslau from 1929 and Paul Klee at the art academy in Dusseldorf as of 1932. The Weimar architectural academy, the direct successor of the Bauhaus, employed former students and masters of the Bauhaus such as Ernst Neufert, Erich Dieckmann and Wilhelm Wagenfeld as teachers. In 1926, the former Bauhaus member Sándor Bortnyik founded the ‘Mühely’ (workshop) also known as the ‘Hungarian Bauhaus’, etc. USA With the emigration of many members of the Bauhaus, the Bauhaus idea was transplanted into other cultural circles and under the new conditions, the contents and forms of expression changed. Josef and Anni Albers, Walter Gropius, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, Marcel Breuer emigrated to the USA. In 1937, the New Bauhaus was founded in Chicago by Lászlo Moholy- Nagy. Walter Gropius and above all Ludwig Mies van der Rohe became the most important and influential architects in the USA. Many ideas from Ford‘s rationalisation principles, the lifestyles associated with jazz, steel-frame constructions and the architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright had already been influential at the Bauhaus and beyond in the 1920s, under the title of ‘Americanism’. Not only that, the spirit of Bauhaus around the world now is affecting almost every aspect of human life and will continuing to be passed down by its successors. Training began with the preliminary course ,where new experimental educational methods were applied to acquaint students with the use of materials and the basic principles of design.In three different periods, three different masters are mainly responsible for teaching,including: 1. Johannes Itten’s preliminary course, 1919–1923. 2. László Moholy-Nagy’s preliminary course, 1923–1928. 3. Josef Albers’s preliminary course, 1928–1933. 1.At the Weimar State Bauhaus, he devised a contemporary method of teaching based on insights gained from the progressive educational movement and the artistic avant-garde. Itten encouraged his students to explore their own subjective feelings and to bring creativity to design. His course was divided into three sections: studies of nature and materials including colour and form theory, analyses of the old masters and life drawing. 2.In 1923, the Hungarian Constructivist László Moholy-Nagy joined the Bauhaus Weimar as the youngest master of form.Moholy-Nagy adopted Itten’s teaching method in the preliminary course by asking students to carry out independent studies of material.
Recommended publications
  • Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Einführung
    Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Einführung........................................................................................... 9 2 Anfänge.................................................................................................19 2.1 Herkunft, Jugend, Ausbildung...........................................................................19 2.2 Einstieg in den Beruf.........................................................................................22 3 Anfänge im Umfeld des Bauhauses Weimar und Dessau.................25 3.1 Im Bauatelier bei Walter Gropius und Adolf Meyer, 1919-20...................... 25 3.2 Unterricht bei Johannes Itten.......................................................................... 29 3.2.1 Spanienreise mit Paul Linder und Kurt Löwengard, Herbst 1920-21 - Begegnung mit Antoni Gaudi........................................................................32 3.3 Bekanntschaft mit Comelis van Eesteren, Jena 1922 .....................................40 4 Anfänge der Normungsbestrebungen................................................45 4.1 Maßtoleranzen und Präzision............................................................................45 4.2 Vorfertigung, Serienbau, Typisierung - Die Architekturausstellung des Bau­ büros Gropius 1922 und die Internationale Bauhausausstellung................. 1923 48 4.3 Carl Benscheidt sen. - „Der Mensch als Maß aller Dinge".........................59 4.4 Aufenthalt in Alfeld 1923-24 - Bekanntschaft mit Carl Benscheidt sen. und Karl Benscheidt jun. - Serienproduktion
    [Show full text]
  • 'Lebensgestaltungslehre': Formatting Life Beyond the Built
    BJHS Themes (2020), 5, 167–185 doi:10.1017/bjt.2020.13 RESEARCH ARTICLE Ernst Neufert’s ‘Lebensgestaltungslehre’: formatting life beyond the built Anna-Maria Meister* Professor of Architecture Theory and Science, Department of Architecture, Technical University of Darmstadt *Email: [email protected] Abstract In 1936, the Bauhaus-trained architect Ernst Neufert published the first edition of his seminal book Bau-Entwurfslehre. One of the most successful architecture books to date, the encyclopedic volume offered dimensioned floor plans for architectural tasks ranging from bunkers to dog kennels to Zeppelins. Two years later, Neufert started working as ‘norm expert’ for Reichsminister Albert Speer, with whom he published another manual in 1943, Bauordnungslehre. Meant to provide a total system of measures for architecture at large, the volume subjected building blocks, bricks and human bodies to Neufert’s all-encompassing octametric system. This article contrasts these two books against Neufert’s unpublished treatise –‘Lebensgestaltungslehre’. Never a bound volume, the latter was sketched out in diary entries between 1936 and 1942 on folded DIN A4 sheets (themselves normed) and organized in a card index. Reading them across their medial states, this article investi- gates the material, methodological and ideological character of Neufert’s Lehren. This is not the story of ahandbook; rather, this is a story of constructing Lehre one sheet at a time. Neufert’s attempt to format German society in the 1930s and 1940s through inherently
    [Show full text]
  • Architects Data Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    ARCHITECTS DATA PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Ernst Neufert,Peter Neufert,Bousmaha Baiche,Nicholas Walliman | 608 pages | 27 Mar 2012 | John Wiley and Sons Ltd | 9781405192538 | English | Chicester, United Kingdom Architects Data PDF Book To ask other readers questions about Architects' Data , please sign up. One of the sacred references of architecture!! Folkscanomy: A Library of Books. Very necessary for architects! The image quality is perfect. Our field's bible while studying. Oct 05, Alnuha rated it it was amazing. A must have book for all architects. No trivia or quizzes yet. Jan 16, Antonio Suparmun rated it really liked it. Jun 11, Omar Gardi added it. Jun 15, Mariya rated it it was amazing. Details if other :. Weighting now slightly less than two kilograms, it has been continuously updated. His teacher recommended him to Walter Gropius in as one of his first students of the Bauhaus. Video Audio icon An illustration of an audio speaker. Since then, more than half a million books have been printed, in 39 German editions and 17 other languages. Apr 16, Nima rated it it was amazing. More Details We need to a free down load of the neufert fourth edition. On our first assignment for design studio class, we had to collect data and analyze case studies. Shelves: architecture. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Most illustrations are dimensioned and each building type includes plans, Architects' Data provides an essential reference for the initial design and planning of a building project. Organised largely by building type, and with over diagrams, it provides a mass of data on spatial requirements and also covers planning criteria and considerations of function and siting.
    [Show full text]
  • Bauhaus · Modernism · Design 
    Bauhaus · Modernism · Design Editorial The State Bauhaus School was founded in 1919 and became more than just a world-famous school of architecture and art: The Bauhaus was a trailblazer, representing the modernism movement that gained interna- tional acclaim. Today it is considered to be the most influential German cultural export of the 20th century. The Bauhaus stands for great ideas in both design and social reform. It significantly shaped architecture, art, and design, and its influence has lasted up until the present day. Experi- ments in form and colour, architectural icons and everyday design, wild parties and minimalist buildings are closely associated with the Bauhaus. The roots of this modern movement — how it evolved, how it inspired and polarised — can all be experienced in and around Weimar more impressively than in almost any other region. Revolution. New begin- nings. Departure into a new era in Germany’s first democracy, which was also founded in Weimar in 1919. Full of hope, with the absolute will to design and to change. Courage to experiment and zest for life. But also: Arguments and contradiction. Rejection. Expulsion. In Weimar and the surrounding cities of Jena, Erfurt, and Gera, along with the nearby countryside, the bountiful architectural testimonials, the artistic works and historical venues, the current exhibitions and events explain the suspenseful history of the Bauhaus and modernism. Travellers in Thuringia not only find the heritage left by the international artistic avantgarde during the Bauhaus era, but they can also discover the in spiring designers who are working there today and will continue to do so in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • “Indestructible Idea” of the Bauhaus and Its East German Reception
    FROM AN “ALIEN,HOSTILE PHENOMENON” TO THE “POETRY OF THE FUTURE”: ON THE BAUHAUS RECEPTION IN EAST GERMANY, 1945–70 Wolfgang Thöner The “Indestructible Idea” of the Bauhaus and its East German Reception The Bauhaus, the most influential modern design movement of the twen- tieth century, made its presence felt in East Germany (meaning the Soviet Zone of Occupation from 1945 to 1949 and, later, the German Democratic Republic) not only through its intellectual and material legacy, but also through the activities of former teachers and students from the school. The reaction to this legacy was always a politically charged affair in East Germany, linked with fundamental questions of culture, lifestyle, or, as it was called in the GDR, the socialist way of life.1 When one considers the legacy of the Bauhaus, particularly its adap- tation in different cultural contexts, it is important to distinguish the Bauhaus reception from the general reception of modern art.2 Through- out its existence, from 1919 through 1933, the Bauhaus considered itself part of an international avant-garde. Decades after the school was closed, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe spoke of the “indestructible idea” of the Bauhaus, without specifying whether this idea was more a question of style in the art-historical sense or, rather, one of lifestyle.3 The Bauhaus strove to shape the human environment comprehensively; in this regard, it was much more effective and complex than other institutions and movements concerned with design. It was a school which developed and applied new pedagogical methods; it was active in the fields of architec- ture, urban planning, landscape design, industrial design, and graphic design, as well as in the fine arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Zeichnungen Russischer Und Sowjetischer Architekten
    2 Wochenschau Bauwelt 40 | 2013 Bauwelt 40 | 2013 3 garde denkt, sei daran erinnert: Sämtliche Exponate Zwischen Expressionismus und Moderne: stammen aus der Sammlung der Tchoban Founda- Haus Neufert in Bugnaux-sur-Rolle von 1964 tion. Deren Gründer bekannte unlängst im Interview mit schwebend anmutendem Stahlbeton- faltdach auf sechs Stützen (Bauwelt 28.2013), es gehe ihm um den ästhetischen Foto: Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Archiv Genuss, selbst aus größeren Konvoluten würden der Moderne „nur solche Highlights gewählt, die mich persönlich begeistern“. Diesem Auswahlprinzip sind nicht we- nige Entdeckungen zu verdanken, großartige Blätter von geradezu betörender Kunstfertigkeit (an den Aka- demien von St. Petersburg oder Moskau hat sich die perfekte Darstellungskunst als eigenständiges Genre ja bis heute erhalten). Aber hört denn die Kunst bei Säule, Symmetrie und Rocaille auf? Fanden die küh- len Lineaturen der Konstruktivisten nicht zu genau- AUSSTELLUNG für Normungsfragen“, eine Position, die dieser für so faszinierender Ästhetik, sobald man der Bewegung die Erarbeitung einer „Bauordnungslehre“ nutzte. nur mit Wohlwollen begegnete? In Sedows These nun Der andere Neufert | Ausstellung Das 1943 erstmals publizierte Handbuch propagierte haftet dem revolutionären Aufbruch ein Makel an, in Dessau das Oktametrische Maßsystem, konnte jedoch nicht „ein bitterer Beigeschmack des Dienens am Prole ta- an den Erfolg der Bauentwurfslehre anschließen. riat und seiner Diktatur“. Am Ende wirft er kon struk- „Schau im Neufert nach“ wird bei funktionalen Ent- In der Nachkriegszeit avancierte Neufert, hier tivistischen Entwürfen gar ihre Brauchbarkeit vor: wurfsfragen selbst in den Architekturbüros geraten, setzt die Ausstellung an, zum Hausarchitekten ver- „Diese Architektur kann gebaut werden, sie war zum die dem Autor sein Wirken im Nationalsozialismus schiedener Firmen, mit denen er teilweise schon seit Errichten fertig – und wurde in Hunderten von sow- vorwerfen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Whole World a Bauhaus*
    Magazine No 5 2019 / 2020 ZKM I Karlsruhe, Germany * Fritz Kuhr, 1928; student at the Bauhaus from 1923–27, member of staff in the wallpainting workshop 1928–29, teacher of drawing 1929–30 at the Bauhaus THE WHOLE WORLD A BAUHAUS* László Moholy-Nagy In the 1921 Weimar Bauhaus programme experiments with photography without Walter Gropius announced the creation of Painter, photographer, typographer, a camera (photograms). The book stage designer, art theorist and teacher a total work of art: “The Bauhaus strives for Painting Photography Film (1925) set 20 July 1895 in Bácsborsód / Austria- out his theory of “new seeing.” From a unity of all artistic creation, the reunification Hungary – 24 November 1946 in 1928 he was back in Berlin, designing of all the art disciplines – sculpture, painting, Chicago / USA intermedial decorations for the Kroll Opera and the Piscator Stage. the crafts and trades – to form a new art In painting, he experimented with of building in which they are all indispensable Born in southern Hungary as the son materials like aluminum and Bakelite of the Jewish farmer Lipot Weisz, components. The final, if distant goal of the and used Plexiglas placed in front of Moholy-Nagy – the later pioneer of canvases to create transparent three- Bauhaus is the unified work of art – the grand modernism – was raised by his uncle dimensional effects. His experiments building – in which there are no borders in Mohol in today’s Serbia. After led to the construction of a mobile his father left the family, his mother installation made of glass and metal, between monumental and decorative art.” (…) was helped by her lawyer, named the Room Modulator.
    [Show full text]
  • Ernst Neufert 1900 Born on March 15 in Freyburg an Der Unstrut, Son Of
    Ernst Neufert 1900 Born on March 15 in Freyburg an der Unstrut, son of Karl Hermann Neufert and Florentine Berta, née Schlieder 1906–14 Attends the Bürgerschule in Freyburg an der Unstrut 1917 Apprenticeship as a bricklayer; passes the journeyman examination 1918 Supplemental occupational education at the Grossherzoglich-Sächsische Baugewerkenschule, Weimar 1919 Transfers to the Staatliche Bauhaus in Weimar upon the recommendation of the director of the Grossherzoglich-Sächsische Baugewerkenschule, Weimar 1920 Studies at the Staatliche Bauhaus in Weimar; begins a one-year study tour through Spain with fellow student Paul Linder 1921 Returns to Weimar. Hired to work under Walter Gropius in a leading position at his architecture offices in Weimar and Dessau. Marries Alice Spiess-Neufert, née Vollmer; four children are born to the couple: Peter, Christa, Ingrid, and Ilas. 1925 Project manager in the offices of Walter Gropius; among his responsibilities are the new wing of the Bauhaus and the Masters’ Houses project in Dessau. 1926 Called to a professorship under Otto Bartning at the Staatliche Bauhochschule in Weimar; head of the building department 1929 Builds his private home in Gelmeroda, near Weimar, as a prototype for a series of single-family homes After the Nazis close down the architectural school, Neufert moves to Berlin, where he takes over the direction of the architecture department at a private school run by Johannes Itten. 1934–44 In-house architect for the Vereinigte Lausitzer Glaswerke (United Lusatia Glassworks); designs other industrial buildings 1936 Publishes the first edition of the Bauentwurfslehre (Architects’ Data) . Travels to New York with the intention of planning to emigrate; visits Frank Lloyd Wright at Taliesin East, Wisconsin 1938 Receives a commission from Albert Speer to research issues of standardization.
    [Show full text]
  • From Grid to Box – the Containerization of Modern
    A. Klose, Prague Lecture, Goethe Institut Prague, Oct. 7th, 2005 Alexander Klose Graduate Research Group ‚Medial Historiographies’, Bauhaus-University Weimar From Grid to Box – the Containerization of Modern Architecture prepared for and held at: Workshop „City – Media – Space“, organized by research group „Medial Historiographies“ at Goethe Institut Prague, Oct. 6th and 7th, 2005 – 1 – A. Klose, Prague Lecture, Goethe Institut Prague, Oct. 7th, 2005 [structure] 0. Intro (Plan) 3 „Archeology of Globalization“ Modernistic Architecture I. Rationalization 1: Grid 6 idealistic grid 7 disciplinary grid 9 speculative grid 11 total grid 13 three-dimensional grid 16 II. Rationalization 2: Cells 19 Rathenau: honeycombs 20 Le Corbusier: cellules/cells 21 Wachsmann/Gropius: prefabrication 24 Neufert: „Architects-Data“ (Bauentwurfslehre) 26 III. Machine Age 30 Le Corbusier: des yeux qui ne voient pas / eyes that do not see ... traffic Gropius: Americanism! 33 Mobilization of Housing 35 01. Conclusion (Sum-up) 39 Literature/Illustrations 41 – 2 – A. Klose, Prague Lecture, Goethe Institut Prague, Oct. 7th, 2005 0. Intro [picture: elements_praguelecture] These are the two elements of my research into the structural fundament of modernistic architecture (theory): 1. the grid = the overall structure 2. the cell (or box, or container) = the single (and universal) element. Research Project: part of my Container research project, entitled "20 Foot Equivalent Unit. Containerization takes command" = „Archeology of Globalisation“ –> material culture of today’s globalised world –> transportlogistics: container. Container not only in shipping industry, but also in the cities and in the cultural sphere: As architectural and/or cultural phenomenon (on stage, on tv, in artworks) it is starting to become ubiquitous.
    [Show full text]
  • International Working Party for Documentation and Conservation Of
    d o _ c o _ m o _ m o _ International working party for documentation and conservation of buildings, sites and neighbourhoods of the modern movement ISC/R members update 2003 for office use only Full Documentation Fiche 2007 composed by national/regional working party of: Germany 0. Picture of building/ group of buildings/ urban scheme/ landscape/ garden depicted item: Bauhaus Dessau, view from southwest source: Stiftung Bauhaus Dessau, photo M. Brück date: 2005 1. Identity of building/ group of buildings/ group of buildings/ landscape/garden 1. 1 Data for identification current name: Bauhaus Dessau number(s) and name(s) of street(s): Gropiusallee 38 town: Dessau province/state: Saxony-Anhalt post code: 06846 country: Germany national topographical grid reference: - current typology: ADM/EDC/MON former/original/variant typology: EDC (Bauhaus, school for design and municipal vocational business school) 1 comments on typology: 1. 2 Status of protection protected by: Federal State of Saxony-Anhalt grade: monument date: 1974 valid for: complete building and site remarks: first discussion about listing the building in 1945, since 1964 on a tentative list for monuments in GDR protected by: UNESCO grade: world heritage site date: 1996 valid for: complete building and site, including buffer zone 1. 3 Visually or functionally related building(s)/site(s) name(s) of surrounding area/building(s): visual relations: functional relations: other relations: The Bauhaus Building is listed as world heritage together with the Masters’ Houses in Dessau and the Bauhaus sites in Weimar. 2. History of building 2. 1 Chronology Note if the dates are exactly known (e) or approximately estimated = circa (c) or (±) commission or competition date: June 22nd 1925: decision of the city of Dessau to construct a new building for the Bauhaus school design period(s): (e) 1925-1926 start of site work: 1925, topping out ceremony March 21st, 1926 completion/inauguration: inauguration (e) December 4th, 1926 2.
    [Show full text]
  • STIFTUNG~ DEUTSCHER Stipend Iatin Patricia Merke! Berichtet Über Ihre Promotionsarbeit ARCHITEKTEN
    Nordrhein-Westfalen I Stiftung Ernst Neufert- der Architekt STIFTUNG~ DEUTSCHER Stipend iatin Patricia Merke! berichtet über ihre Promotionsarbeit ARCHITEKTEN .... Es wäre nicht ganz richtig, Ernst Neufert sonders konzen trier­ (1900- 1986) als einen Unbekannten unter ten Blick auf ihre Ge­ den Architekten des 20 . Jahrhunderts zu be­ stalt und Gestaltung zeichnen. Aber auch wenn innerhalb der letz­ fordert. ten Jahre einige seiner Gebäude vereinzelt Zahlreiche dieser wohltuend saniert wurden und damit dem Gebäude, besonders Architektur-Gedächtnis erhalten bleiben, ist die aus den 1950er dennoch festzustellen, dass sein Leben und Jahren, sind noch er­ gebautes Werk zunehmend in Vergessenheit halten, aber auch eini­ geraten sind . Dementsprechend blieben um­ ge Werke aus den 30er fassende kritische oder wissenschaftliche Aus­ Jahren sind nicht nur einandersetzungen, sowohl mit dem Leben ertüchtigt oder saniert, Neuferts als auch mit seiner Architektur, bis­ sondern auch in ihrer lang aus . Selbst eine vol lständige Werkliste ursprünglich entwor­ besteht nicht. Explizit seine frühen und prä• fenen Funktion erhal­ genden 1920er und 30er Jahre mit den groß• ten oder modifiziert und en geschichtsträchtigen Stationen wie Wei­ stehen unter Denkmal­ mar, Dessau und Berlin sind in der bisher vor­ schutz. Um hier nur ei­ liegenden wissenschaftlichen Literatur kaum nige zu nennen, gehö• behandelt -und wenn, dann spielt er hier nur ren dazu vor allem das eine beiläufige Rolle . Mathematische Institut (Abbeanum) der Uni­ Auch wenn Ernst Neufert in der Architektur­ versität Jena und das geschichte nicht gänzlich unerforscht ist, er­ Studentenhaus der Uni­ scheint er gerade im Vergleich zu seinen Zeit­ versität Jena (jeweils genossen als eher marginale Position. Er wird 1929-30).
    [Show full text]
  • Ernst Neufert's
    BJHS Themes (2020), 5, 167–185 doi:10.1017/bjt.2020.13 RESEARCH ARTICLE Ernst Neufert’s ‘Lebensgestaltungslehre’: formatting life beyond the built Anna-Maria Meister* Professor of Architecture Theory and Science, Department of Architecture, Technical University of Darmstadt *Email: [email protected] Abstract In 1936, the Bauhaus-trained architect Ernst Neufert published the first edition of his seminal book Bau-Entwurfslehre. One of the most successful architecture books to date, the encyclopedic volume offered dimensioned floor plans for architectural tasks ranging from bunkers to dog kennels to Zeppelins. Two years later, Neufert started working as ‘norm expert’ for Reichsminister Albert Speer, with whom he published another manual in 1943, Bauordnungslehre. Meant to provide a total system of measures for architecture at large, the volume subjected building blocks, bricks and human bodies to Neufert’s all-encompassing octametric system. This article contrasts these two books against Neufert’s unpublished treatise –‘Lebensgestaltungslehre’. Never a bound volume, the latter was sketched out in diary entries between 1936 and 1942 on folded DIN A4 sheets (themselves normed) and organized in a card index. Reading them across their medial states, this article investi- gates the material, methodological and ideological character of Neufert’s Lehren. This is not the story of ahandbook; rather, this is a story of constructing Lehre one sheet at a time. Neufert’s attempt to format German society in the 1930s and 1940s through inherently
    [Show full text]