Melbourne Airport Environs Safeguarding Standing Advisory

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Melbourne Airport Environs Safeguarding Standing Advisory Melbourne Airport Environs Safeguarding 19 Standing Advisory Committee ‐ Issues and Options Paper Full Name: Frank Rivoli Organisation: Affected property: Attachment 1: https://engage.vic.gov.au/download_file/48231 Attachment 2: Attachment 3: Comments: see attached submission Submission Cover Sheet The Hume residents Airport Action Group (Inc) is making this submission on behalf of thousands of residents residing in the suburbs located east of Melbourne Airport. Our submission is to provide community views to the Melbourne Airport Environs Safeguarding panel and a response to the Issues Option paper. Community Response to Aircraft Noise The last known study commission by the commonwealth was in 1982. “Aircraft Noise in Australia, a Survey of Community Reaction.”, NAL Report No.88, February 1982 (A.J Hede & R.B Bullen) The time is past due for another survey, considering the changes in aircraft movement volumes and residential development near airports. The example from the Perth Airport Third Runway MDP, Health study suggest the 1982 study is being referred to in current airport planning, The draft Perth Airport Third Runway MDP, Health study lists research documents from Ising and Kruppa 2004 study into health impacts from aircraft noise which refers to 1982 study by (A.J Hede & R.B Bullen), a document which is out of date and should and may not provide reliable relevant data based on current and future aviation growth. We encourage the panel to make a recommendation for a new survey to gauge community reaction to aircraft noise. Aircraft Noise The area of flight operations over the suburbs of Broadmeadows, Jacana, Dallas, Attwood, Westmeadows, Gladstone Park and Gowanbrae are overflown by runways from both Essendon and Melbourne Airports and additional to jets aircraft is Helicopter operations. The current and proposed runway east of Melbourne Airport and runways North of Essendon Airport have intersecting flight paths over our houses. The Melbourne Airport Environs Strategy only refers to the ANEF noise contours from Melbourne Airport. A combined ANEF should be calculated for this area, and may also be required for parts of Moonee Valley. Failing to detail the accumulated aircraft noise from all sources flying over our houses underestimates the noise impact on residential areas. Residents have measured aircraft noise in lounge and bedroom around 55dBa and greater, this noise measurement was taken pre-covid and is noise from the airport, not runway path. The airport noise is generated by all aircraft taking off in the south and north direction. This noise is not reflected in the ANEF Contour. There are a vast number of residential dwellings, east of the airport built prior to airport master plans and publication of ANEF noise contours, therefore aircraft noise is not attenuated and penetrates into our homes. Page 1 of 5 Policy Failure Since the Melbourne Airport Environs Area Strategy Plan, 2003 came into effect a significant number of residential dwellings have either been renovated or re-established as multi units per lot under the flight path of a future East/West runway. The Melbourne Airport 2003 master plan showed the noise contours based on the ultimate capacity till 2023(Fig1). Melbourne Airport has no declared aircraft movement capacity limit therefore the Melbourne Airport Environ Strategy has little prospect of ensuring residential development will not prejudice the airport development. The extent which ANEF contours have grown in 15 years can be seen in (Fig2), since 2003 and up to the current times the planning scheme has approved residential building permits using the 2003 ANEF contours. This has left residents exposed to harmful impact from aircraft noise. Fig 1 – Showing residential development along Camp Rd. Broadmeadows. Page 2 of 5 Fig 2 – Showing extended ANEF contours since 2003 airport master plan. Declaration of aircraft movement capacity for Melbourne Airport. The Airport Act 1996, section 195 states a minister may make a written declaration setting out the declared reasonable capacity for an airport. This is the first step in orderly airport development. It will provide certainty for Government, Airport Operators, Stakeholders, Business and community. It will strengthen the planning scheme and would remove the planning issues from variable un- capped airport capacity. Deemed to Comply provisions set out in the MAES 2003 Item 5.1 of the MAES 2003 recommended the State Government formulate “deemed to comply” construction standard as an alternative to fill assessment of noise exposure and attenuation requirements. The application of “Deemed to Comply” is not an alternative to a full assessment of noise exposure and attenuation building requirements. The MAES 2003 has left people exposed to aircraft noise, it has failed to develop relevant building standard material to justify, “Deemed to Comply”. We provide the following example taken from an acoustic assessment for a residential dwelling located in Keilor, approximately 4 Kilometre from the proposed North/South third runway. The location is within the 25ANEF contour, and is un-acceptable for residential as per AS2021. The assessment was completed in 2002. Page 3 of 5 As2021 recommends the following indoor sound level for residential house. • Sleeping and lounge 50dB(A) • Other Habitable Spaces 55dB(A) • Bathrooms, Toilets, Laundries 60dB(A) • Some Building construction Items recommended to achieve AS2021 requirement are: Windows • Glazing to Bedroom 10mm thick laminated or toughened • Kitchen / Family rooms 10mm thick laminated or toughened Windows should be fixed and sealed and should close against a compressible acoustic seal. Ceilings Bedrooms, Lounge should be lined with 2 layers of 10mm thick plaster board over laid with 100mm thick, 24kg/m² Cellulose ceiling insulation. Contrast this with the standard construction materials used in existing houses built in this area before the Melbourne Airport Environs Strategy of 2003. • 3-4mm Window Glass is fitted to all areas, Bedrooms, Lounge, Kitchen, Family Room, Toilet, Laundries • Single layer of 10mm Plaster board to all rooms Typically houses built prior to MAES 2003 have the following construction • 3-4mm Window Glass is fitted to all areas, Bedrooms, Lounge, Kitchen, Family Room, Toilet, Laundries • Single layer of 10mm Plaster board to all rooms • Houses were not fitted with insulation as part of the building code, however thermal insulation is fitted at owner request. • Unsealed windows • Wall insulation not required We cannot find supporting evidence which shows existing houses can be assessed as deemed to comply. The result of the Deemed to Comply method has left residential houses up-protected from aircraft noise. Strengthening airport safeguarding through land use controls, without implementing the necessary building requirements to make existing homes fit for purpose as per AS2021, continues to over burden our communities and ensures their low socioeconomic status will continue. Page 4 of 5 Compensation The panel of the MAES 2003 did not support a recommendation compensation for injurious affection and loss of development rights. Reasons given was compensation for injurious affection was outside the scope of the MAES and compensation for loss of development rights is inappropriate. Since 2003 the subject of compensation has received attention by the High of Australia and the Australian Human Rights Commission, perhaps this issue should be re-visited. Solutions There is considerable effort put into information on how to best describe aircraft noise. The information come in various forms such as the Melbourne Airport Noise tool, ANEF contours and the N-Contours. It is difficult to see how this information can resolve specific issues of noise impact. Its aim is to inform the recipients of aircraft noise on the minimum level of disturbance, none of which addresses the noise distribution at source. Legislators and planners which assess areas suitable for residential development. Develop solutions for those residents who have had their homes rendered not fit for purpose by airport development, these include: 1. Offer a buyout scheme for those who choose to leave the area. 2. Offer to insulate and bring up to current building code standard. 3. Legislate a capacity cap for Melbourne Airport, taking into account its location is land locked in all directions and the surrounding residential development. 4. Strength the building code and permit system for residential dwelling in areas affected by aircraft noise. 5. Remove the Deemed to Comply methodology to assess housing noise attenuation. Hume Residents Airport Action Group 22 June 2021 Page 5 of 5 .
Recommended publications
  • Airport City Developments in Australia : Land Use Classification and Analyses
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Queensland University of Technology ePrints Archive QUT Digital Repository: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/ Walker, Arron R. and Stevens, Nicholas J. (2008) Airport city developments in Australia : land use classification and analyses. In: 10th TRAIL Congress and Knowledge Market, 14-15 October 2008, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. © Copyright 2008 [please consult the authors] Airport city developments in Australia Land use classification and analyses TRAIL Research School, Delft, October 2008 Authors Dr. Arron Walker, Dr. Nicholas Stevens Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering, School of Urban Development, Queensland University of Technology, Qld, Australia © 2008 by A. Walker, N. Stevens and TRAIL Research School Contents Abstract 1 Introduction.......................................................................................................1 2 Background........................................................................................................2 2.1 Aviation growth in Australia...............................................................................2 2.2 Airport ownership in Australia ...........................................................................3 2.3 Airport Planning under Airports Act 1996 .........................................................4 2.4 Diversification of airport revenue.......................................................................5 3 Land use analysis: methods and materials .....................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Loss of Control, Clyde North, Vic., 23 February 2007, Van's Aircraft Inc
    ATSB TRANSPORT SAFETY INVESTIGATION REPORT Aviation Occurrence Investigation – 200701033 Final Loss of Control Clyde North, Victoria 23 February 2007 Van’s Aircraft Inc. RV-4, VH-ZGH ATSB TRANSPORT SAFETY INVESTIGATION REPORT Aviation Occurrence Investigation 200701033 Final Loss of Control Clyde North, Victoria 23 February 2007 Van’s Aircraft Inc. RV-4, VH-ZGH Released in accordance with section 25 of the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003 - i - Published by: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Postal address: PO Box 967, Civic Square ACT 2608 Office location: 15 Mort Street, Canberra City, Australian Capital Territory Telephone: 1800 621 372; from overseas + 61 2 6274 6440 Accident and incident notification: 1800 011 034 (24 hours) Facsimile: 02 6247 3117; from overseas + 61 2 6247 3117 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.atsb.gov.au © Commonwealth of Australia 2008. This work is copyright. In the interests of enhancing the value of the information contained in this publication you may copy, download, display, print, reproduce and distribute this material in unaltered form (retaining this notice). However, copyright in the material obtained from other agencies, private individuals or organisations, belongs to those agencies, individuals or organisations. Where you want to use their material you will need to contact them directly. Subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968, you must not make any other use of the material in this publication unless you have the permission of the Australian Transport Safety Bureau. Please direct requests for further information or authorisation to: Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Copyright Law Branch Attorney-General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 www.ag.gov.au/cca ISBN and formal report title: see ‘Document retrieval information’ on page iii.
    [Show full text]
  • Avalon Airspace Review 2019
    Avalon Airspace Review December 2019 Office of Airspace Regulation Page 2 of 44 File Reference: FO18/1007 Document Reference: D19/48884 Document control: Version Issue/Nature of Revision Date 0.1 Initial January 2019 0.2 First draft revision February 2019 0.3 Second draft revision March 2019 0.4 Incorporates peer feedback July 2019 0.5 Incorporates Management feedback & update data September 2019 0.6 Branch Manager review October 2019 0.7 Airservices Australia review December 2019 Avalon Airspace Review – 2019 Version: 0.7 Office of Airspace Regulation Page 3 of 44 Executive Summary The Airspace Act 2007 (Act) provides the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) with authority to administer and regulate Australian-administered airspace and authorises CASA to undertake regular reviews of existing airspace arrangements. The Office of Airspace Regulation (OAR) has conducted an airspace review within a 15 nautical mile (NM) radius of Avalon Airport to determine if the airspace remains fit for purpose. The review examined the airspace architecture, classifications, procedures and infrastructure from the surface to 8,500 feet (FT) above mean sea level (AMSL). The previous aeronautical study specifically for Avalon was conducted in 2008.1 This airspace review applies CASA’s regulatory philosophy which considers the primacy of air safety, whilst taking into account the environment, security, cost and is consistent with the Australian Airspace Policy Statement 2018 and the Minister’s Statement of Expectations. A multifaceted approach was used in conducting this review, including quantitative and qualitative analysis consisting of: • Aerodrome traffic data; • Airspace design; • Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) incident data; and • Stakeholder consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • VFR Flight Into Dark Night Conditions and Loss of Control Involving Piper PA-28-180, VH-POJ
    VFR flight into dark night Insertconditions document and loss titleof control involving Piper PA-28-180, VH-POJ Location31 km north | Date of Horsham Airport, Victoria | 15 August 2011 ATSB Transport Safety Report Investigation [InsertAviation Mode] Occurrence Occurrence Investigation Investigation XX-YYYY-####AO -2011-10 0 Final – 3 December 2013 Released in accordance with section 25 of the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003 Publishing information Published by: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Postal address: PO Box 967, Civic Square ACT 2608 Office: 62 Northbourne Avenue Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601 Telephone: 1800 020 616, from overseas +61 2 6257 4150 (24 hours) Accident and incident notification: 1800 011 034 (24 hours) Facsimile: 02 6247 3117, from overseas +61 2 6247 3117 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.atsb.gov.au © Commonwealth of Australia 2013 Ownership of intellectual property rights in this publication Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia. Creative Commons licence With the exception of the Coat of Arms, ATSB logo, and photos and graphics in which a third party holds copyright, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form license agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided that you attribute the work. The ATSB’s preference is that you attribute this publication (and any material sourced from it) using the following wording: Source: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Copyright in material obtained from other agencies, private individuals or organisations, belongs to those agencies, individuals or organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting the Bendigo Region to Melbourne Airport
    Connecting the Bendigo region to Melbourne Airport For the first time passengers along the Bendigo Line will be able to catch a train to Melbourne Airport, with a single interchange at Sunshine Station. Bendigo Kangaroo Flat Harcourt To and from Melbourne Airport Bendigo Castlemaine — Seamless interchange between V/Line and airport services at Sunshine. KangarooMalmsbury Flat — Trains running from Sunshine to Melbourne KynetonHarcourt Airport every 10 minutes. CastlemaineWoodend — Easy access for interstate and international Macedon visitors, with a journey time from Melbourne Malmsbury Airport to Bendigo of around two hours. Gisborne Kyneton Melbourne Riddells Creek Airport ClarkefieldWoodend To CBD SunburyMacedon via Metro Tunnel WatergardensGisborne Melbourne Riddells Creek Sunshine Southern Airport Clarkefield Cross To CBD Sunbury via Metro Tunnel Legend Watergardens Melbourne Airport Rail Sunbury, Cranbourne and Pakenham (Metro Tunnel) Sunshine Southern Regional connections Cross Project timeline Legend Further engagementMelbourne Airport and detailed Rail planningSunbury, and development Cranbourne and Pakenham (Metro Tunnel) Regional connections 2020 onwards 2020-2021 2022 2029 Community and Statutory planning Construction Target stakeholder approval process commencement* opening engagement Market engagement date* Business case and Procurement process design development *Subject to relevant Victorian and Federal planning, environmental and other government approvals. About Melbourne Airport Rail Melbourne Airport Rail The Australian and Victorian The final project budget will be governments have agreed that confirmed once all major contracts is a transformational Melbourne Airport Rail will run on are awarded, with construction to public transport project dedicated, new tracks from a new begin in 2022 and a target opening premium station at Melbourne date for Melbourne Airport Rail connecting Melbourne Airport to Sunshine Station, where of 2029.
    [Show full text]
  • Experience Won't Always Save
    Avoidable Accidents No. 6 Experience won’t always save you Pilot experience is not always a protection against an accident Research AR-2012-035 Publication title Avoidable Accidents No. 6 Experience won’t always save you: Pilot experience is not always a protection against an accident Report No. AR-2012-035 Publication date March 2013 ISBN 978-1-74251-291-4 Publishing information Published by: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Postal address: PO Box 967, Civic Square ACT 2608 Office: 62 Northbourne Avenue Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601 Telephone: 1800 020 616, from overseas +61 2 6257 4150 (24 hours) Accident and incident notification: 1800 011 034 (24 hours) Facsimile: 02 6247 3117, from overseas +61 2 6247 3117 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.atsb.gov.au © Commonwealth of Australia 2013 Ownership of intellectual property rights in this publication Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia (referred to below as the Commonwealth). Creative Commons licence With the exception of the Coat of Arms, ATSB logo, and photos and graphics in which a third party holds copyright, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form license agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided that you attribute the work. The ATSB’s preference is that you attribute this publication (and any material sourced from it) using the following wording: Source: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Copyright in material obtained from other agencies, private individuals or organisations, belongs to those agencies, individuals or organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • MINUTES AAA Victorian Division Meeting
    MINUTES AAA Victorian Division Meeting Tuesday 30 August 2016 8.30-16:30 Stamford Plaza Melbourne, 111 Little Collins Street, Melbourne 1. Welcome and Apologies Paul Ferguson (Chair) opened the meeting and welcomed members, thanking them for their attendance. New members were welcomed including Moira Shire Council (Yarrawonga Aerodrome) and three corporate members; Briggs Communications, JJ Ryan Consulting and Ubimet. Cate Anderson was introduced and welcomed as AAA Policy and Communications Officer. All actions arising have been completed. The sole action from the March 16 Division meeting was to distribute the meeting minutes which was completed. No formal correspondence was received. Attendees and apologies are set out below (the attendees list has been prepared based on the attendance sheet signed by attendees at the meeting). Presentations authorised for distribution are attached to the minutes. Members seeking additional information should contact the presenters directly. ATTENDEES Marianne Richards AAA Guest Matt Smale Air BP Leigh Robinson Airport Equipment Martin Chlupac Airport Lighting Specialists Ra Manuera Airport Lighting Specialists Kent Quigley Airservices Patrick Cui Airservices Australia David Young Arup Cate Anderson Australian Airports Association Nick Lane Australian Airports Association Simon Bourke Australian Airports Association Ken Keech Avalon Airshow Jill Brix Avisure Pty Ltd Roger Druce Bacchus Marsh Aerodrome Joseph Walsh Beca Anthony Perizzolo Boral Allan Briggs Briggs Communications Phil McConnell Cloud
    [Show full text]
  • Collision with Terrain Involving Cessna 182, VH-KKM, 19 Km WSW Of
    InsertCollision document with terrain title involving Cessna 182, VH-KKM Location19 km WSW | Date of Mount Hotham Airport, Victoria | 23 October 2013 ATSB Transport Safety Report Investigation [InsertAviation Mode] Occurrence Occurrence Investigation Investigation XX-YYYY-####AO-2013-186 Final – 16 April 2015 Cover photo: Aircraft owner Released in accordance with section 25 of the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003 Publishing information Published by: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Postal address: PO Box 967, Civic Square ACT 2608 Office: 62 Northbourne Avenue Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601 Telephone: 1800 020 616, from overseas +61 2 6257 4150 (24 hours) Accident and incident notification: 1800 011 034 (24 hours) Facsimile: 02 6247 3117, from overseas +61 2 6247 3117 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.atsb.gov.au © Commonwealth of Australia 2015 Ownership of intellectual property rights in this publication Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia. Creative Commons licence With the exception of the Coat of Arms, ATSB logo, and photos and graphics in which a third party holds copyright, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form license agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided that you attribute the work. The ATSB’s preference is that you attribute this publication (and any material sourced from it) using the following wording: Source: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Copyright in material obtained from other agencies, private individuals or organisations, belongs to those agencies, individuals or organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Industry Guidelines Ports of Entry (Airports and Maritime)
    Industry Guidelines Ports of Entry (Airports and Maritime) 19 March 2021 Ports of entry (airports and maritime) Victoria moved to COVIDSafe settings from 11:59pm on Friday 26 February 2021, and updates were made to restrictions at 11:59pm on Monday 15 March 2021. These restrictions will be reviewed regularly, to ensure they reflect current public health advice. All businesses must have a completed COVIDSafe Plan for each workplace to continue operating in Victoria. Ports of entry servicing international arrivals have additional obligations as determined by the Workplace Additional Industry Obligations Directions which apply to all ports of entry workplaces (including airports and maritime ports) where ports of entry workers and contractors are employed or engaged. This document provides advice to those employers and workers on how to limit the potential for transmission of COVID-19 and outline how ports of entry may continue to operate in a COVIDSafe way. Which locations are covered by these Guidelines? Ports Airports Port of Melbourne Melbourne Airport Port of Geelong Avalon Airport Port of Portland Essendon Airport Port of Hastings Jet Base Melbourne Which workers are covered by these Guidelines? A port of entry worker means: any airport or maritime port worker who has direct contact with international passengers or crew (excluding international passengers and crew entering Victoria from a Green Zone Country) at the international port of entry, including occasional contact or interactions; or a worker or person who interacts with the environment within the international port of entry where international passengers and crew are or have been, which includes any worker or person who boards a vessel, ship or aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Avalon Airport Rail Link
    AVALON AIRPORT RAIL LINK Planning study findings and public exhibition Introduction Avalon Airport Rail Link is a proposed rail link connecting Avalon Airport with Melbourne and Geelong. The rail link will help support Avalon to become Victoria’s second international passenger airport, ensuring that Victoria remains competitive into the future. Study purpose Reservation of the rail link corridor The rail link design has been developed to between the Melbourne – Geelong accurately define the proposed corridor. This planning study is being undertaken rail line and Avalon Airport is being to identify and protect a reservation for implemented by amendment to the Bridge structures will provide rail- a future rail link to the airport. Greater Geelong Planning Scheme to over-road grade separations at Old introduce a Public Acquisition Overlay. Melbourne Road, Princes Freeway and Beach Road. No permanent Background waterways will be crossed but the design would accommodate areas of Situated 20 km north-east of the City Project need temporary ponding after heavy rain, of Geelong and 55 km south-west of The rail link is part of an integrated using culverts or other infrastructure. Melbourne, Avalon Airport is a fully plan to ensure that Victoria is well operational commercial airline facility positioned in the future to cater for The rail link will terminate at a station to with an operating domestic airline the expected growth in air travel. be constructed adjacent to the existing terminal and a runway capable of passenger terminal area of the airport. receiving aircraft up to A380. With the The Victorian Government is planning support of government, the private for a population of more than 10 million operator Avalon Airport Australia Pty people by 2051, including 7.8 million Transport services Ltd is working to secure an international people in Greater Melbourne.
    [Show full text]
  • Essendon Fields Precinct – Hyatt Place Melbourne
    insert cover positional here MELBOURNE CBD about this 15 minutes box size 10% Transparency of your 16 DFO ESSENDON cover artwork Tullamarine Freeway & CityLink TRA N S P O R T A BOUT U S 15 iFLY THINGS TO D O F OOD & DRINK 6 ESSENDON FIELDS AIRPORT 7 GYMNASIUM S ERVICE S 9 ESSENDON FIELDS CENTRAL 12 LAMANNA CAFÉ & SUPERMARKET ue ven 1 THE HUNGRY FOX CAFÉ ve A Hargra Bristol Street 2 CAR DEALERSHIPS MELBOURNE AIRPORT 3 FLIGHT EXPERIENCES 8 CHILDCARE 11 DENTIST 7km* 4 AIRWAYS MUSEUM 13 HYATT PLACE HOTEL & EVENTS CENTRE CYCLING TRAIL 5 BOUNCE INC. TRAM STOP 56 10 MEDICAL CENTRE English Street ESSENDON STATION oad Nomad R levard kin Bou Lar ESSENDON FIELDS IS WELL CONNECTED TO BOTH THE BUSINESS DISTRICT MELBOURNE CBD AND 14 MR MCCRACKEN RESTAURANT & BAR MELBOURNE AIRPORT MELBOURNE CBD 10km* Public Transport The free EF Station Shuttle operates from Essendon Fields to Essendon Train Station. Every weekday departing on the half hour between 7.15 – 9.30am & 4.15 – 6.30pm. Tram service 59 is a short walk from EF. Stop 56 (Airport West), located on Matthews Ave/ Earl Street departs every 8 minutes. Myki available from EF Newsagency. Airport Transit 16 DFO Essendon The free airport shuttle bus operates on- DFO Essendon comprises over 110 outlet retailers including demand daily between Essendon Fields Polo Ralph Lauren, Hugo Boss, Ted Baker and Coach. The Airport and Melbourne Airport between adjacent Homemaker Hub comprises over 20 stores. 6.00am and 10.00pm. Visit ef.com.au/ 100 Bulla Road, Essendon airportshuttle for booking details.
    [Show full text]
  • TTF Rapid Buses, Road & Rail (Melbourne Airport)
    RAPID BUSES, ROAD AND RAIL GROUND TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS TO MEET MELBOURNE AIRPORT’S PASSENGER GROWTH TO 2050 JULY 2013 Membership of Tourism & Transport Forum Tourism & Transport Forum (TTF) is a national, member-funded CEO forum, advocating the public policy interests of 200 leading corporations and institutions in the Australian tourism, transport, aviation and investment sectors For further information please contact: Justin Wastnage | Director, Aviation Policy | [email protected] Martin Gray | Policy Officer |[email protected] Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 4 Ensuring transport choice for Melbourne Airport ................................................................ 4 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................... 6 List of figures ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 MELBOURNE AIRPORT – THE NEXT 30 YEARS ............................................................ 7 Forecast demand .................................................................................................................... 7 ACCESSING MELBOURNE AIRPORT .......................................................................... 8 Internal airport transport ......................................................................................................... 8 Broader road network ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]