Mastophora~~~~Jand
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
First Evidence of Aggressive Chemical Mimicry in the Malagasy Orb
First evidence of aggressive chemical mimicry in the Malagasy orb weaving spider Exechocentrus lancearius Simon, 1889 (Arachnida: Araneae: Araneidae) and description of a second species in the genus Scharff, Nikolaj; Hormiga, Gustavo Published in: arthropod systematics & phylogeny Publication date: 2012 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: Unspecified Citation for published version (APA): Scharff, N., & Hormiga, G. (2012). First evidence of aggressive chemical mimicry in the Malagasy orb weaving spider Exechocentrus lancearius Simon, 1889 (Arachnida: Araneae: Araneidae) and description of a second species in the genus. arthropod systematics & phylogeny, 70(2), 107-118. http://www.senckenberg.de/files/content/forschung/publikationen/arthropodsystematics/asp_70_2/04_asp_70_2 _scharff_hormiga_107-118.pdf Download date: 26. sep.. 2021 Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 107 70 (2) 107 – 118 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, eISSN 1864-8312, 28.09.2012 First evidence of aggressive chemical mimicry in the Malagasy orb weaving spider Exechocentrus lancearius Simon, 1889 (Arachnida: Araneae: Araneidae) and description of a second species in the genus NIKOLAJ SCHARFF 1 & GUSTAVO HORMIGA 2 1 Natural History Museum of Denmark, Zoological Museum and Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark [[email protected]] 2 Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University Washington, D.C. 20052, USA [[email protected]] Received 17.i.2012, accepted 13.vii.2012. Published online at www.arthropod-systematics.de on 28.ix.2012. > Abstract The araneid genus Exechocentrus Simon, 1889 and its type species Exechocentrus lancearius were originally described based on a single female specimen from Madagascar, which was missing the abdomen. -
Insect Pheromones: an Overview of Function, Form, and Discovery ⇑ Joanne Y
Progress in Lipid Research 59 (2015) 88–105 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Progress in Lipid Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/plipres Review Insect pheromones: An overview of function, form, and discovery ⇑ Joanne Y. Yew a,b,c, , Henry Chung d a Pacific Biosciences Research Center, 1993 East-West Road, University of Hawai’i at Ma¯noa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA b Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory, 1 Research Link, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117604, Singapore c Department of Biological Sciences, 14 Science Drive 4, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117546, Singapore d Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Laboratory of Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA article info abstract Article history: For many species of insects, lipid pheromones profoundly influence survival, reproduction, and social Received 23 September 2013 organization. Unravelling the chemical language of insects has been the subject of intense research in Received in revised form 1 May 2015 the field of chemical ecology for the past five decades. Characterizing the forms, functions, and biosyn- Accepted 12 June 2015 thesis of lipid pheromones has led not only to the development of strategies for controlling agricultural Available online 14 June 2015 pests but has also provided insights into fundamental questions in evolutionary biology. Despite the enormous variety of chemical structures that are used as pheromones, some common themes in function Keywords: and biosynthetic pathways have emerged across studies of diverse taxa. This review will offer a general Insects overview of insect lipid pheromone function and biochemical synthesis, describe analytical methods for Drosophila Pheromones pheromone discovery, and provide perspectives on the contribution of chemical ecology to pest control Mass spectrometry and understanding evolutionary processes. -
Potential Distribution and New Records of Mastophora Gasteracanthoides (Nicolet) (Arachnida: Araneae) in Chile
www.biotaxa.org/rce Revista Chilena de Entomología (2018) 44 (4): 487-491. Scientific Note Potential distribution and new records of Mastophora gasteracanthoides (Nicolet) (Arachnida: Araneae) in Chile Nuevos registros y distribución potencial de Mastophora gasteracanthoides (Nicolet) (Arachnida: Araneae) en Chile Andrés Taucare-Ríos1 and Patrich Cerpa 2,3 ¹Centro de Investigación en Medio Ambiente (CENIMA), Universidad Arturo Prat, Casilla 121, Iquique, Chile. Correspondence autor. E-mail: [email protected] 2Instituto de Entomología, Universidad Metropolitana de Ciencias de la Educación, Avenida José Pedro Alessandri 774, Ñuñoa, Santiago, Chile. 3Red de Observadores de Aves y Vida Silvestre de Chile (ROC). Santiago, Chile. ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:439DDD45-FDCF-4FC5-B46E-5BAB83C92006 Abstract. The known distribution for the species Mastophora gasteracanthoides to the north of Chile is widened. A brief redescription to recognize the species and information about natural history are given. Finally, with the new records we evaluated the potential distribution of this species in the country. Key words: Atacama Desert, new records, spiders. Resumen. Se amplía la distribución conocida para la especie Mastophora gasteracanthoides hacia el norte de Chile. Se entrega una breve redescripción para reconocer a la especie e información acerca de su historia natural. Finalmente, con los nuevos registros evaluamos la distribución potencial de esta especie en el país. Palabras clave: Desierto de Atacama, nuevos registros, arañas. The genus Mastophora (Holmberg, 1876) is represented by 49 described species in the Americas (World Spider Catalog 2018). This genus comprises a small group of spiders that are notable for their curiously formed and sculptured bodies (Gerstch 1955; Levi 2003). -
Phylogeny of the Orb‐Weaving Spider
Cladistics Cladistics (2019) 1–21 10.1111/cla.12382 Phylogeny of the orb-weaving spider family Araneidae (Araneae: Araneoidea) Nikolaj Scharffa,b*, Jonathan A. Coddingtonb, Todd A. Blackledgec, Ingi Agnarssonb,d, Volker W. Framenaue,f,g, Tamas Szuts} a,h, Cheryl Y. Hayashii and Dimitar Dimitrova,j,k aCenter for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; bSmithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution, NW Washington, DC 20560-0105, USA; cIntegrated Bioscience Program, Department of Biology, University of Akron, Akron, OH, USA; dDepartment of Biology, University of Vermont, 109 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405-0086, USA; eDepartment of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, WA 6986, Australia; fSchool of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia; gHarry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, 90 South St., Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia; hDepartment of Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, H1077 Budapest, Hungary; iDivision of Invertebrate Zoology and Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA; jNatural History Museum, University of Oslo, PO Box 1172, Blindern, NO-0318 Oslo, Norway; kDepartment of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway Accepted 11 March 2019 Abstract We present a new phylogeny of the spider family Araneidae based on five genes (28S, 18S, COI, H3 and 16S) for 158 taxa, identi- fied and mainly sequenced by us. This includes 25 outgroups and 133 araneid ingroups representing the subfamilies Zygiellinae Simon, 1929, Nephilinae Simon, 1894, and the typical araneids, here informally named the “ARA Clade”. -
Eight Legged Encounters Eileen A
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Eileen Hebets Publications Papers in the Biological Sciences 11-2014 Eight Legged Encounters Eileen A. Hebets University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscihebets Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, Behavior and Ethology Commons, Biology Commons, Entomology Commons, and the Genetics and Genomics Commons Hebets, Eileen A., "Eight Legged Encounters" (2014). Eileen Hebets Publications. 73. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscihebets/73 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Eileen Hebets Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. EIGHT-LEGGED ENCOUNTERS By Eileen A. Hebets, University of Nebraska; Funded by NSF TABLE OF CONTENTS CLASSIFICATION & TAXONOMY STATIONS I. WHAT IS AN ARTHROPOD? page 4 a. The goal of this station is to introduce the audience to some basic information about “arthropods”. Who are they? How and why are they grouped together? Answers to these questions are achieved through a sorting game with plastic animals. II. CREATE A CHELICERATE page 14 a. This station introduces the audience to the basic characteristics of chelicerates (a group which they have learned about from Station I) by allowing them to build their own chelicerate out of clay. III. ASSEMBLE AN ARACHNID page 16 a. Arachnids are surprisingly diverse, with 11 different living orders! This station introduces the audience to the diversity of body types found within the 11 living arachnid orders through a coloring activity. -
List of Ohio Spiders
List of Ohio Spiders 20 March 2018 Richard A. Bradley Department of EEO Biology Ohio State University Museum of Biodiversity 1315 Kinnear Road Columbus, OH 43212 This list is based on published specimen records of spider species from Ohio. Additional species that have been recorded during the Ohio Spider Survey (beginning 1994) are also included. I would very much appreciate any corrections; please mail them to the above address or email ([email protected]). 656 [+5] Species Mygalomorphae Antrodiaetidae (foldingdoor spiders) (2) Antrodiaetus robustus (Simon, 1890) Antrodiaetus unicolor (Hentz, 1842) Atypidae (purseweb spiders) (3) Sphodros coylei Gertsch & Platnick, 1980 Sphodros niger (Hentz, 1842) Sphodros rufipes (Latreille, 1829) Ctenizidae (trapdoor spiders) (1) Ummidia audouini (Lucas, 1835) Araneomorphae Agelenidae (funnel weavers) (14) Agelenopsis emertoni Chamberlin & Ivie, 1935 | Agelenopsis kastoni Chamberlin & Ivie, 1941 | Agelenopsis naevia (Walckenaer, 1805) grass spiders Agelenopsis pennsylvanica (C.L. Koch, 1843) | Agelnopsis potteri (Blackwell, 1846) | Agelenopsis utahana (Chamberlin & Ivie, 1933) | Coras aerialis Muma, 1946 Coras juvenilis (Keyserling, 1881) Coras lamellosus (Keyserling, 1887) Coras medicinalis (Hentz, 1821) Coras montanus (Emerton, 1889) Tegenaria domestica (Clerck, 1757) barn funnel weaver In Wadotes calcaratus (Keyserling, 1887) Wadotes hybridus (Emerton, 1889) Amaurobiidae (hackledmesh weavers) (2) Amaurobius ferox (Walckenaer, 1830) In Callobius bennetti (Blackwall, 1848) Anyphaenidae (ghost spiders) -
1 CURRICULUM VITAE Kenneth F. Haynes Address: Department Of
CURRICULUM VITAE Kenneth F. Haynes Address: Department of Entomology Phone: (859) 257-1618 University of Kentucky FAX: (859) 323-1120 Lexington, Kentucky 40546–0091 E–mail: [email protected] Education: University of California, Davis, Ph. D. in Entomology, 1982 State University of New York at Binghamton, B.S. in Biological Science, 1976 Employment Professor of Entomology, Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky (July 1, 1995–Present) Bobby C. Pass Research Professor, University of Kentucky (July 1, 2012– June 30, 2016) Associate Professor of Entomology, University of Kentucky (July 1, 1991–June 30, 1995) Assistant Professor of Entomology, University of Kentucky (September 1, 1986–June 30, 1991) Postdoctoral Research Associate, University of California, Riverside (August 1982–August 1986) Awards and Honors: Phi Beta Kappa (Elected 1976) University of California Regents Fellowship (1977–1978) Distinguished Scholar Research Award (1977) Earl C. Anthony Fellowship (1978–Declined to accept NSF award) National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship (1978–1981) Teaching Award for Outstanding Graduate Student (U. C. Davis, 1982) Thomas Poe Cooper Research Award, College of Agriculture (1993) Wethington Award for Grantsmanship, University of Kentucky (2009–2010) High Impact Research/Extension Program Award (2011 with M. Potter and R. Palli) Fellow, American Association for the Advancement of Science (2011) Paul Catts Memorial Lecture, Washington State University (2011) GGE Scudder Lecture, University of British Columbia (2012) Vince Parman Memorial Lecture, North Carolina State University (2012) C. V. Riley Award, North Central Branch, ESA (2012) Thomas and Nina Leigh Distinguished Alumni Seminar, UC Davis (2013) Refereed Journal Articles 1. Pollak EI, Becker LR, Haynes K. 1978. Sensory control of mating in the blue gourami, Trichogaster trichopterus (Pisces, Belontidae). -
Pókok Növényvédelmi Szerepe Kártevő Rovarokkal Szemben
1 DOKTORI (PhD) ÉRTEKEZÉS PANNON EGYETEM GEORGIKON KAR ÁLLAT- ÉS AGRÁRKÖRNYEZET-TUDOMÁNYI DOKTORI ISKOLA FESTETICS DOKTORI ISKOLA ISKOLAVEZETŐ: Dr. Anda Angéla egyetemi tanár TÉMAVEZETŐ: Dr. Samu Ferenc tudományos tanácsadó BELSŐ TÉMAVEZETŐ: Dr. Marczali Zsolt Ferenc egyetemi docens PÓKOK NÖVÉNYVÉDELMI SZEREPE KÁRTEVŐ ROVAROKKAL SZEMBEN Készítette: Beleznai Orsolya Ágnes KESZTHELY 2019 2 PÓKOK NÖVÉNYVÉDELMI SZEREPE KÁRTEVŐ ROVAROKKAL SZEMBEN Értekezés doktori (PhD) fokozat elnyerése érdekében Írta: Beleznai Orsolya Ágnes Készült a Pannon Egyetem Festetics Doktori iskolája, Környezettudományok programja, Élőlények az agrárkörnyezetben alprogramja keretében. Témavezető: Dr. Samu Ferenc Elfogadásra javaslom (igen / nem) (aláírás) Belső témavezető: Dr. Marczali Zsolt Ferenc Elfogadásra javaslom (igen / nem) (aláírás) A jelölt a doktori szigorlaton ........%-ot ért el, Az értekezést bírálóként elfogadásra javaslom: Bíráló neve: …........................ …................. igen /nem ………………………. (aláírás) Bíráló neve: …........................ …................. igen /nem ………………………. (aláírás) A jelölt az értekezés nyilvános vitáján …..........%-ot ért el. Keszthely, …………………………. a Bíráló Bizottság elnöke A doktori (PhD) oklevél minősítése: …................................. ……………………… Az EDHT elnöke 3 TARTALOM Kivonatok ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Magyar nyelvű kivonat ................................................................................................................. -
Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 1 14(2): 1 1 1-206
2005. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 1 14(2): 1 1 1-206 THE SPIDER SPECIES OF THE GREAT LAKES STATES 1 2 3 4 Petra Sierwald , Michael L. Draney , Thomas Prentice , Frank Pascoe , Nina 1 5 2 1 Sandlin , Elizabeth M. Lehman , Vicki Medland , and James Louderman : 'Zoology, The Field Museum, 1400 S Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605; 2Department of Natural and Applied Sciences and Cofrin Center for Biodiversity, University of Wisconsin-Green Bay, 2420 Nicolet Drive, Green Bay, Wisconsin 3 5431 1; Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, California 92521; 4Biology, College of St. Francis, 500 Wilcox Street, Joliet, Illinois 60435: 5 Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405 ABSTRACT. Critical analysis of existing spider species lists for Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio. Indiana and Illinois reveals 900 species recorded from the five-state region (284 genera, 40 families). All non- native, Palearctic, or otherwise questionable species records were scrutinized, and their status is discussed. The most speciose families in the region are the Linyphiidae (almost 24% of species), Salticidae (10.3%), Theridiidae (8.9%), Lycosidae (8.8%), and Araneidae (7.7%). All sources used for spider species names and species records are unambiguously quoted. Spider species records are presented in tables allowing comparison of family composition among the states, and prediction of number of heretofore unrecorded species. Richness among states is analyzed and found to be dependent on varying degrees of sampling effort. As a new tool, a Spider Species Name Concordance Table allows tracking previously published spider species names to the currently valid name of every species record. -
A Preliminary Checklist to the Spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) of Minnesota (U.S.A.) with Annotations
A Preliminary Checklist to the Spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) of Minnesota (U.S.A.) with Annotations Chad J. Heins: Biology Department, Bethany Lutheran College, Mankato, Minnesota Assistant Professor of Biology Bethany Lutheran College 700 Luther Drive Mankato, MN 56001 Abstract This is a list of spider species for Minnesota (U.S.A.). It includes species that have been recorded in Minnesota as well as those which have ranges that suggest they are likely to be found in the state in the future. The checklist is a compilation of records from the literature, museums, and personal collection efforts by the author. Each species is annotated with a select reference or references and a comment if necessary. This list represents several new state records and expansions of several species’ known ranges. Key Terms: Minnesota, Araneae INTRODUCTION Spiders are an abundant component of terrestrial arthropod assemblages. Over 3,800 species of spiders have been documented in North America north of Mexico (Bradley 2013). They present interesting subjects for the study of behavior, taxonomy, and ecology and it has been suggested that they may serve as important ecological indicators (Clausen 1986; Churchill 1997). Their abundance, ease of capture, and limited expense to study make them ideal subjects for study at the undergraduate level and an interest in such applications sent the author in search of a list of Minnesota spiders. The only faunal list for Minnesota that could be located was limited to the family-level (Cutler 1976). Several states and provinces in North America have developed such spider faunal lists. In the Upper Midwest, such lists have been created for Michigan (Snider 1991), Illinois/Indiana (Beatty 2002), Wisconsin (Levi & Field 1954), and Manitoba (Benell-Aitchison & Dondale 1990). -
Ar-113: the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station 113Th Annual
AR-113 The Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station 113 th Annual Report 2000 College of Agriculture University of Kentucky • Lexington, Kentucky 40546 2 To His Excellency, The Honorable Paul Patton Governor of Kentucky I herewith submit the one hundred and thirteenth annual report of the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station for the period ending December 31, 2000. This is done in accordance with an act of Congress, approved March 2, 1887, entitled, “An act to establish Agricultural Experiment Stations, in connection with the Agricultural Colleges established in the several states under the provisions of an act approved July 2, 1862, and under the acts supplementary thereto,” and also the act of Kentucky State Legislature, approved February 20, 1888, accepting the provisions of the act of Congress. Very respectfully, M. Scott Smith, Director Lexington, Kentucky June 30, 2001 3 4 Contents Purpose of the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station......................................7 Statewide Research .................................................................................................... 7 Regulatory Services .................................................................................................... 8 Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station Projects .............................................. 11 Publications .............................................................................................................. 16 Ph.D. Dissertations.................................................................................................. -
Chemical Mimicry at Its Finest1,2
725 REVIEW / SYNTHE` SE Cheaters and liars: chemical mimicry at its finest1,2 N.J. Vereecken and J.N. McNeil Abstract: Chemical mimicry is an essential part of certain interspecific interactions, where the outcome for both species may depend on the degree to which the original signals are mimicked. In this review, we discuss a number of specific cases relating to pollination and obtaining nutrient resources that we believe exemplify recent advances in our understand- ing of chemical mimicry. Subsequently, we suggest avenues for future ecological and chemical research that should allow us to gain further insight into the evolution of chemical mimicry. Re´sume´ : Le mime´tisme chimique est une composante essentielle de certaines interactions entre les espe`ces, dans lesquel- les l’issue pour les deux espe`ces peut de´pendre du degre´ de mime´tisme des signaux d’origine. Dans notre re´trospective, nous discutons de plusieurs cas spe´cifiques relie´sa` la pollinisation et a` l’obtention des ressources en nutriments qui, a` no- tre avis, illustrent bien les progre`sre´cents dans la compre´hension du mime´tisme chimique. Nous proposons ensuite des avenues de recherche e´cologiques et chimiques pour le futur qui devraient permettre des perspectives plus approfondies sur l’e´volution du mime´tisme chimique. [Traduit par la Re´daction] Introduction sitoids (Noldus 1988; Noldus et al. 1991; Hilker et al. 2000; Milonas et al. 2009). Similarly, the feces or honeydew from Organisms may obtain information through an array of aphids and other sap-feeding insects may be exploited as auditory, visual, mechanical, and (or) chemical cues, and in foraging cues, as well as alternate food, by the parasitoids recent years, there have been a number of major publica- and predators that feed on the herbivore (Bouchard and tions examining animal communication channels (Bradbury Cloutier 1984; Budenberg 1990; Wa¨ckers 2005; Wa¨ckers et and Vehrencamp 1998; Hauser and Konishi 1999; Espmark al.