DOCSLIB.ORG

1 CURRICULUM VITAE Kenneth F. Haynes Address: Department Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 CURRICULUM VITAE Kenneth F. Haynes Address: Department Of CURRICULUM VITAE Kenneth F. Haynes Address: Department of Entomology Phone: (859) 257-1618 University of Kentucky FAX: (859) 323-1120 Lexington, Kentucky 40546–0091 E–mail: [email protected] Education: University of California, Davis, Ph. D. in Entomology, 1982 State University of New York at Binghamton, B.S. in Biological Science, 1976 Employment Professor of Entomology, Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky (July 1, 1995–Present) Bobby C. Pass Research Professor, University of Kentucky (July 1, 2012– June 30, 2016) Associate Professor of Entomology, University of Kentucky (July 1, 1991–June 30, 1995) Assistant Professor of Entomology, University of Kentucky (September 1, 1986–June 30, 1991) Postdoctoral Research Associate, University of California, Riverside (August 1982–August 1986) Awards and Honors: Phi Beta Kappa (Elected 1976) University of California Regents Fellowship (1977–1978) Distinguished Scholar Research Award (1977) Earl C. Anthony Fellowship (1978–Declined to accept NSF award) National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship (1978–1981) Teaching Award for Outstanding Graduate Student (U. C. Davis, 1982) Thomas Poe Cooper Research Award, College of Agriculture (1993) Wethington Award for Grantsmanship, University of Kentucky (2009–2010) High Impact Research/Extension Program Award (2011 with M. Potter and R. Palli) Fellow, American Association for the Advancement of Science (2011) Paul Catts Memorial Lecture, Washington State University (2011) GGE Scudder Lecture, University of British Columbia (2012) Vince Parman Memorial Lecture, North Carolina State University (2012) C. V. Riley Award, North Central Branch, ESA (2012) Thomas and Nina Leigh Distinguished Alumni Seminar, UC Davis (2013) Refereed Journal Articles 1. Pollak EI, Becker LR, Haynes K. 1978. Sensory control of mating in the blue gourami, Trichogaster trichopterus (Pisces, Belontidae). Behavioral Biology 22:92–103. 2. Haynes KF, Birch MC, Klun JA. 1981. Sex pheromone offers promise for control of the artichoke plume moth. California Agriculture 35:13–14. 3. Klun JA, Haynes KF, Bierl–Leonhardt BA, Birch MC, Plimmer JR. 1981. Sex pheromone of the female artichoke plume moth, Platyptilia carduidactyla. Environ Entomol 10:763–765. 1 4. Haynes KF, Gaston LK, Pope MM, Baker TC. 1983. Rate and periodicity of pheromone release from individual female artichoke plume moths. Environ Entomol 12:1597–1600. 5. Haynes KF, Birch MC. 1984a. Mate locating and courtship behaviors of the artichoke plume moth, Platyptilia carduidactyla. Environ Entomol 13:399–408. 6. Haynes KF, Birch MC. 1984b. The periodicity of pheromone release and male responsiveness in the artichoke plume moth, Platyptilia carduidactyla. Physiol Entomol 9:287–295. 7. Haynes KF, Gaston LK, Pope MM, Baker TC. 1984. Potential for evolution of resistance to pheromones: interindividual and interpopulational variation in chemical communication system of pink bollworm moth. J Chem Ecol 10:1551–1565. 8. Baker TC, Willis MA, Haynes KF, Phelan PL. 1985. A pulsed cloud of sex pheromone elicits upwind flight in male moths. Physiol Entomol 10:257–265. 9. Haynes KF, Baker TC. 1985. Sublethal effects of permethrin on the chemical communication system of the pink bollworm moth. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 2:283–293. 10. Haynes KF, Birch MC. 1986. Temporal reproductive isolation between two species of plume moths. Ann Entomol Soc Amer 79:210–215. 11. Haynes KF, Li WG, Baker TC. 1986a. Control of pink bollworm moth with insecticides and pheromones (attracticide): Lethal and sublethal effects. J Econ Entomol 79:1466–1471. 12. Haynes KF, Miller TA, Staten RT, Li WG, Baker TC. 1986b. Monitoring insecticide resistance with insect pheromones. Experientia 42:1293–1295. 13. Haynes KF, Parrella MP, Miller TA, Trumble J. 1986c. Monitoring insecticide resistance with yellow sticky cards. California Agriculture 40:11–12. 14. Li W, Haynes KF, Baker TC. 1986. Sensory and behavioral effects of gossyplure alcohol on the sex pheromone response of male pink bollworm moths. J Chem Ecol 12:25–38. 15. Baker TC, Haynes KF. 1987. Manuvers used by flying male oriental fruit moths to relocate a sex pheromone plume in an experimentally shifted wind field. Physiol Entomol 12:263–279. 16. Haynes KF. 1987. Identification of the sex pheromone of the calendula plume moth, Platyptilia williamsii. J Chem Ecol 13:907–916. 17. Haynes KF, Miller TA, Staten RT, Li WG, Baker TC. 1987. Pheromone trap for monitoring insecticide resistance in the pink bollworm moth, Pectinophora gossypiella: New tool for resistance management. Environ Entomol 16(1):84–89. 18. Haynes KF, Baker TC. 1988. Potential for evolution of resistance to pheromones: World wide and local variation in the chemical communication system of the pink bollworm moth, Pectinophora gossypiella. J Chem Ecol 14:1547–1560. 19. Baker TC, Haynes KF. 1989. Field and laboratory electroantennographic measurements of pheromone plume structure. Physiol Entomol 14:1–12. 20. Haynes KF, Baker TC. 1989. An analysis of anemotactic flight in female moths stimulated by host odour and comparison to the males' response to sex pheromone. Physiol Entomol 14:279– 289. 21. Campero DM, Haynes KF. 1990. Effects of methoprene on chemical communication, courtship and oviposition in the cabbage looper moth. J Econ Entomol 83:2263–2268. 22. Clark JD, Haynes KF. 1990. Sex attractant for the bluegrass webworm. J Econ Entomol 83:856– 859. 23. Haynes KF. 1990. Identification of the sex pheromone of the bristly cutworm, Lacinipolia renigera (Stephens). J Chem Ecol 16:2615–2621. 24. Haynes KF, Hunt RE. 1990a. Interpopulational variation in the six component pheromone blend of the cabbage looper moth, Trichoplusia ni. J Chem Ecol 16:509–519. 25. Haynes KF, Hunt RE. 1990b. A mutation in the pheromonal communication system of the cabbage looper moth, Trichoplusia ni. J Chem Ecol 16:1249–1257. 2 26. Hunt RE, Haynes KF. 1990. Periodicity in the quantity and blend ratios of pheromone components emitted by mutant and normal cabbage looper moths. J Insect Physiol 36:769–774. 27. Hunt RE, Zhao BG, Haynes KF. 1990. Genetic aspects of interpopulational differences in the pheromone blend of the cabbage looper moth, Trichoplusia ni. J Chem Ecol 16:2935–2946. 28. Haynes KF, Zhao JZ, Latif A. 1991. Identification of floral compounds from Abelia grandiflora that stimulate upwind flight in cabbage looper moths, Trichoplusia ni. J Chem Ecol 17:637–646. 29. McLellan KAM, Nordin GL, Haynes KF. 1991. Chemical communication and reproductive isolation in two types of the fall webworm. Ann Entomol Soc Amer 84:118–123. 30. Clark DC, Haynes KF. 1992a. Sublethal effects of cypermethrin on chemical communication, courtship and oviposition in the cabbage looper moth. J Econ Entomol 85:1771–1778. 31. Clark DC, Haynes KF. 1992b. Sublethal effects of chlordimeform on chemical communication and other reproductive behaviors in the cabbage looper moth. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 19:105–117. 32. ElAgamy FM, Haynes KF. 1992. Susceptibility of the pea aphid to a predator and an insecticide in the presence of synthetic alarm pheromone. J Econ Entomol 85:794–798. 33. Haynes KF, Potter DA, Collins JT. 1992. Attraction of male beetles to grubs: Evidence for the evolution of a sex pheromone from larval odor. J Chem Ecol 18:1117–1124. 34. Hunt RE, Fox JP, Haynes KF. 1992. Behavioral response of Graminella nigrifrons to experimentally manipulated vibrational signals. J Insect Behavior 5:1–13. 35. Liu YB, Haynes KF. 1992. Filamentous nature of pheromone plumes protects integrity of signal from background noise in cabbage looper moths, Trichoplusia ni. J Chem Ecol 18:299–307. 36. Todd JL, Haynes KF, Baker TC. 1992. Antennal neurones specific for redundant pheromone components in normal and mutant Trichoplusia ni males. Physiol Entomol 17:183–192. 37. Hunt RE, Parr JC, Haynes KF. 1993. Influence of leafhoppper gender and female mating status on plant disease dynamics within a simple habitat. Environ Entomol 22:109–115. 38. Liu YB, Haynes KF. 1993a. Impact of (Z) 7 dodecenol and turbulence on pheromone mediated flight manoeuvres of male Trichoplusia ni. Physiol Entomol 18:363–371. 39. Liu YB, Haynes KF. 1993b. Pheromone mediated responses of male cabbage looper moths following various exposures to sex pheromone or (Z)-7 dodecenol. J Chem Ecol 19:503–515. 40. Potter DA, Haynes KF. 1993. Field testing pheromone traps for predicting masked chafer (Scarabaeidae) grub density in golf course turf and home lawns. J Entomol Sci 28:205–212. 41. Jurenka RA, Haynes KF, Adlof R, Bengtsson M, Roelofs WL. 1994. Sex pheromone component ratio in the cabbage looper moth altered by a mutation affecting the fatty acid chain shortening reactions in the pheromone biosynthetic pathway. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 24:373–381. 42. Liu YB, Haynes KF. 1994a. Temporal and temperature–induced changes in emission rates and blend ratios of sex pheromone components in Trichoplusia ni. J Insect Physiol 40:341–346. 43. Liu YB, Haynes KF. 1994b. Evolution of behavioral responses to sex pheromone in mutant laboratory colonies of Trichoplusia ni. J Chem Ecol 20:231–238. 44. Haynes KF, Potter DA. 1995. Chemically mediated sexual attraction of male Cyclocephala lurida and other Scarabaeid beetles to immature stages. Environ Entomol 24:1302–1306. 45. Moore AJ, Reagan NL, Haynes KF. 1995. Conditional signaling strategies: Effects of ontogeny, social experience and social status on the pheromonal signal of male cockroaches. Anim Behav 50:191–202. 46. Baker TC, Haynes KF. 1996. Pheromone–mediated optomotor anemotaxis and altitude control exhibited by male oriental fruit moths in the field. Physiol Entomol 21:20–32. 47. Haynes KF, Yeargan KV, Millar JG, Chastain BB. 1996. Identification of sex pheromone of Tetanolita mynesalis , a prey species of bolas spider, Mastophora hutchinsoni. J Chem Ecol 22:75–89. 3 48. Moore PJ, ReaganWallin NL, Haynes KF, Moore AJ. 1997. Odour conveys status on cockroaches. Nature 389:25–25. 49. Zhao JZ, Haynes KF. 1997. Does PBAN play an alternative role of controlling pheromone emission in the cabbage looper moth, Trichoplusia ni? J Insect Physiol 43:695–700.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions Toward a Lepidoptera (Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, Thyrididae, Drepanoidea, Geometro
    Contributions Toward a Lepidoptera (Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, Thyrididae, Drepanoidea, Geometroidea, Mimalonoidea, Bombycoidea, Sphingoidea, & Noctuoidea) Biodiversity Inventory of the University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Lab Hugo L. Kons Jr. Last Update: June 2001 Abstract A systematic check list of 489 species of Lepidoptera collected in the University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Lab is presented, including 464 species in the superfamilies Drepanoidea, Geometroidea, Mimalonoidea, Bombycoidea, Sphingoidea, and Noctuoidea. Taxa recorded in Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, and Thyrididae are also included. Moth taxa were collected at ultraviolet lights, bait, introduced Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), and by netting specimens. A list of taxa recorded feeding on P. notatum is presented. Introduction The University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Laboratory (NATL) contains 40 acres of natural habitats maintained for scientific research, conservation, and teaching purposes. Habitat types present include hammock, upland pine, disturbed open field, cat tail marsh, and shallow pond. An active management plan has been developed for this area, including prescribed burning to restore the upland pine community and establishment of plots to study succession (http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~walker/natl.htm). The site is a popular collecting locality for student and scientific collections. The author has done extensive collecting and field work at NATL, and two previous reports have resulted from this work, including: a biodiversity inventory of the butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea & Papilionoidea) of NATL (Kons 1999), and an ecological study of Hermeuptychia hermes (F.) and Megisto cymela (Cram.) in NATL habitats (Kons 1998). Other workers have posted NATL check lists for Ichneumonidae, Sphecidae, Tettigoniidae, and Gryllidae (http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~walker/insect.htm).
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)
    WISCONSIN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 6 JUNE 2018 CHECKLIST OF WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea) Leslie A. Ferge,1 George J. Balogh2 and Kyle E. Johnson3 ABSTRACT A total of 1284 species representing the thirteen families comprising the present checklist have been documented in Wisconsin, including 293 species of Geometridae, 252 species of Erebidae and 584 species of Noctuidae. Distributions are summarized using the six major natural divisions of Wisconsin; adult flight periods and statuses within the state are also reported. Examples of Wisconsin’s diverse native habitat types in each of the natural divisions have been systematically inventoried, and species associated with specialized habitats such as peatland, prairie, barrens and dunes are listed. INTRODUCTION This list is an updated version of the Wisconsin moth checklist by Ferge & Balogh (2000). A considerable amount of new information from has been accumulated in the 18 years since that initial publication. Over sixty species have been added, bringing the total to 1284 in the thirteen families comprising this checklist. These families are estimated to comprise approximately one-half of the state’s total moth fauna. Historical records of Wisconsin moths are relatively meager. Checklists including Wisconsin moths were compiled by Hoy (1883), Rauterberg (1900), Fernekes (1906) and Muttkowski (1907). Hoy's list was restricted to Racine County, the others to Milwaukee County. Records from these publications are of historical interest, but unfortunately few verifiable voucher specimens exist. Unverifiable identifications and minimal label data associated with older museum specimens limit the usefulness of this information. Covell (1970) compiled records of 222 Geometridae species, based on his examination of specimens representing at least 30 counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Habitat and Bat Activity on Moth Community Composition and Seasonal Phenology Across Habitat Types
    INFLUENCE OF HABITAT AND BAT ACTIVITY ON MOTH COMMUNITY COMPOSITION AND SEASONAL PHENOLOGY ACROSS HABITAT TYPES BY MATTHEW SAFFORD THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2018 Urbana, Illinois Advisor: Assistant Professor Alexandra Harmon-Threatt, Chair and Director of Research ABSTRACT Understanding the factors that influence moth diversity and abundance is important for monitoring moth biodiversity and developing conservation strategies. Studies of moth habitat use have primarily focused on access to host plants used by specific moth species. How vegetation structure influences moth communities within and between habitats and mediates the activity of insectivorous bats is understudied. Previous research into the impact of bat activity on moths has primarily focused on interactions in a single habitat type or a single moth species of interest, leaving a large knowledge gap on how habitat structure and bat activity influence the composition of moth communities across habitat types. I conducted monthly surveys at sites in two habitat types, restoration prairie and forest. Moths were collected using black light bucket traps and identified to species. Bat echolocation calls were recorded using ultrasonic detectors and classified into phonic groups to understand how moth community responds to the presence of these predators. Plant diversity and habitat structure variables, including tree diameter at breast height, ground cover, and vegetation height were measured during summer surveys to document how differences in habitat structure between and within habitats influences moth diversity. I found that moth communities vary significantly between habitat types.
    [Show full text]
  • First Evidence of Aggressive Chemical Mimicry in the Malagasy Orb
    First evidence of aggressive chemical mimicry in the Malagasy orb weaving spider Exechocentrus lancearius Simon, 1889 (Arachnida: Araneae: Araneidae) and description of a second species in the genus Scharff, Nikolaj; Hormiga, Gustavo Published in: arthropod systematics & phylogeny Publication date: 2012 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: Unspecified Citation for published version (APA): Scharff, N., & Hormiga, G. (2012). First evidence of aggressive chemical mimicry in the Malagasy orb weaving spider Exechocentrus lancearius Simon, 1889 (Arachnida: Araneae: Araneidae) and description of a second species in the genus. arthropod systematics & phylogeny, 70(2), 107-118. http://www.senckenberg.de/files/content/forschung/publikationen/arthropodsystematics/asp_70_2/04_asp_70_2 _scharff_hormiga_107-118.pdf Download date: 26. sep.. 2021 Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 107 70 (2) 107 – 118 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, eISSN 1864-8312, 28.09.2012 First evidence of aggressive chemical mimicry in the Malagasy orb weaving spider Exechocentrus lancearius Simon, 1889 (Arachnida: Araneae: Araneidae) and description of a second species in the genus NIKOLAJ SCHARFF 1 & GUSTAVO HORMIGA 2 1 Natural History Museum of Denmark, Zoological Museum and Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark [[email protected]] 2 Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University Washington, D.C. 20052, USA [[email protected]] Received 17.i.2012, accepted 13.vii.2012. Published online at www.arthropod-systematics.de on 28.ix.2012. > Abstract The araneid genus Exechocentrus Simon, 1889 and its type species Exechocentrus lancearius were originally described based on a single female specimen from Madagascar, which was missing the abdomen.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Pheromones: an Overview of Function, Form, and Discovery ⇑ Joanne Y
    Progress in Lipid Research 59 (2015) 88–105 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Progress in Lipid Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/plipres Review Insect pheromones: An overview of function, form, and discovery ⇑ Joanne Y. Yew a,b,c, , Henry Chung d a Pacific Biosciences Research Center, 1993 East-West Road, University of Hawai’i at Ma¯noa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA b Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory, 1 Research Link, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117604, Singapore c Department of Biological Sciences, 14 Science Drive 4, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117546, Singapore d Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Laboratory of Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA article info abstract Article history: For many species of insects, lipid pheromones profoundly influence survival, reproduction, and social Received 23 September 2013 organization. Unravelling the chemical language of insects has been the subject of intense research in Received in revised form 1 May 2015 the field of chemical ecology for the past five decades. Characterizing the forms, functions, and biosyn- Accepted 12 June 2015 thesis of lipid pheromones has led not only to the development of strategies for controlling agricultural Available online 14 June 2015 pests but has also provided insights into fundamental questions in evolutionary biology. Despite the enormous variety of chemical structures that are used as pheromones, some common themes in function Keywords: and biosynthetic pathways have emerged across studies of diverse taxa. This review will offer a general Insects overview of insect lipid pheromone function and biochemical synthesis, describe analytical methods for Drosophila Pheromones pheromone discovery, and provide perspectives on the contribution of chemical ecology to pest control Mass spectrometry and understanding evolutionary processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Distribution and New Records of Mastophora Gasteracanthoides (Nicolet) (Arachnida: Araneae) in Chile
    www.biotaxa.org/rce Revista Chilena de Entomología (2018) 44 (4): 487-491. Scientific Note Potential distribution and new records of Mastophora gasteracanthoides (Nicolet) (Arachnida: Araneae) in Chile Nuevos registros y distribución potencial de Mastophora gasteracanthoides (Nicolet) (Arachnida: Araneae) en Chile Andrés Taucare-Ríos1 and Patrich Cerpa 2,3 ¹Centro de Investigación en Medio Ambiente (CENIMA), Universidad Arturo Prat, Casilla 121, Iquique, Chile. Correspondence autor. E-mail: [email protected] 2Instituto de Entomología, Universidad Metropolitana de Ciencias de la Educación, Avenida José Pedro Alessandri 774, Ñuñoa, Santiago, Chile. 3Red de Observadores de Aves y Vida Silvestre de Chile (ROC). Santiago, Chile. ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:439DDD45-FDCF-4FC5-B46E-5BAB83C92006 Abstract. The known distribution for the species Mastophora gasteracanthoides to the north of Chile is widened. A brief redescription to recognize the species and information about natural history are given. Finally, with the new records we evaluated the potential distribution of this species in the country. Key words: Atacama Desert, new records, spiders. Resumen. Se amplía la distribución conocida para la especie Mastophora gasteracanthoides hacia el norte de Chile. Se entrega una breve redescripción para reconocer a la especie e información acerca de su historia natural. Finalmente, con los nuevos registros evaluamos la distribución potencial de esta especie en el país. Palabras clave: Desierto de Atacama, nuevos registros, arañas. The genus Mastophora (Holmberg, 1876) is represented by 49 described species in the Americas (World Spider Catalog 2018). This genus comprises a small group of spiders that are notable for their curiously formed and sculptured bodies (Gerstch 1955; Levi 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the Orb‐Weaving Spider
    Cladistics Cladistics (2019) 1–21 10.1111/cla.12382 Phylogeny of the orb-weaving spider family Araneidae (Araneae: Araneoidea) Nikolaj Scharffa,b*, Jonathan A. Coddingtonb, Todd A. Blackledgec, Ingi Agnarssonb,d, Volker W. Framenaue,f,g, Tamas Szuts} a,h, Cheryl Y. Hayashii and Dimitar Dimitrova,j,k aCenter for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; bSmithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution, NW Washington, DC 20560-0105, USA; cIntegrated Bioscience Program, Department of Biology, University of Akron, Akron, OH, USA; dDepartment of Biology, University of Vermont, 109 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405-0086, USA; eDepartment of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, WA 6986, Australia; fSchool of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia; gHarry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, 90 South St., Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia; hDepartment of Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, H1077 Budapest, Hungary; iDivision of Invertebrate Zoology and Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA; jNatural History Museum, University of Oslo, PO Box 1172, Blindern, NO-0318 Oslo, Norway; kDepartment of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway Accepted 11 March 2019 Abstract We present a new phylogeny of the spider family Araneidae based on five genes (28S, 18S, COI, H3 and 16S) for 158 taxa, identi- fied and mainly sequenced by us. This includes 25 outgroups and 133 araneid ingroups representing the subfamilies Zygiellinae Simon, 1929, Nephilinae Simon, 1894, and the typical araneids, here informally named the “ARA Clade”.
    [Show full text]
  • Eight Legged Encounters Eileen A
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Eileen Hebets Publications Papers in the Biological Sciences 11-2014 Eight Legged Encounters Eileen A. Hebets University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscihebets Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, Behavior and Ethology Commons, Biology Commons, Entomology Commons, and the Genetics and Genomics Commons Hebets, Eileen A., "Eight Legged Encounters" (2014). Eileen Hebets Publications. 73. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscihebets/73 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Eileen Hebets Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. EIGHT-LEGGED ENCOUNTERS By Eileen A. Hebets, University of Nebraska; Funded by NSF TABLE OF CONTENTS CLASSIFICATION & TAXONOMY STATIONS I. WHAT IS AN ARTHROPOD? page 4 a. The goal of this station is to introduce the audience to some basic information about “arthropods”. Who are they? How and why are they grouped together? Answers to these questions are achieved through a sorting game with plastic animals. II. CREATE A CHELICERATE page 14 a. This station introduces the audience to the basic characteristics of chelicerates (a group which they have learned about from Station I) by allowing them to build their own chelicerate out of clay. III. ASSEMBLE AN ARACHNID page 16 a. Arachnids are surprisingly diverse, with 11 different living orders! This station introduces the audience to the diversity of body types found within the 11 living arachnid orders through a coloring activity.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Ohio Spiders
    List of Ohio Spiders 20 March 2018 Richard A. Bradley Department of EEO Biology Ohio State University Museum of Biodiversity 1315 Kinnear Road Columbus, OH 43212 This list is based on published specimen records of spider species from Ohio. Additional species that have been recorded during the Ohio Spider Survey (beginning 1994) are also included. I would very much appreciate any corrections; please mail them to the above address or email ([email protected]). 656 [+5] Species Mygalomorphae Antrodiaetidae (foldingdoor spiders) (2) Antrodiaetus robustus (Simon, 1890) Antrodiaetus unicolor (Hentz, 1842) Atypidae (purseweb spiders) (3) Sphodros coylei Gertsch & Platnick, 1980 Sphodros niger (Hentz, 1842) Sphodros rufipes (Latreille, 1829) Ctenizidae (trapdoor spiders) (1) Ummidia audouini (Lucas, 1835) Araneomorphae Agelenidae (funnel weavers) (14) Agelenopsis emertoni Chamberlin & Ivie, 1935 | Agelenopsis kastoni Chamberlin & Ivie, 1941 | Agelenopsis naevia (Walckenaer, 1805) grass spiders Agelenopsis pennsylvanica (C.L. Koch, 1843) | Agelnopsis potteri (Blackwell, 1846) | Agelenopsis utahana (Chamberlin & Ivie, 1933) | Coras aerialis Muma, 1946 Coras juvenilis (Keyserling, 1881) Coras lamellosus (Keyserling, 1887) Coras medicinalis (Hentz, 1821) Coras montanus (Emerton, 1889) Tegenaria domestica (Clerck, 1757) barn funnel weaver In Wadotes calcaratus (Keyserling, 1887) Wadotes hybridus (Emerton, 1889) Amaurobiidae (hackledmesh weavers) (2) Amaurobius ferox (Walckenaer, 1830) In Callobius bennetti (Blackwall, 1848) Anyphaenidae (ghost spiders)
    [Show full text]
  • Variation in Lepidopteran Occurrence in Hemlock-Dominated and Deciduous-Dominated Forests of Central Appalachia
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 46 Numbers 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2013 Numbers Article 1 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2013 April 2013 Variation in Lepidopteran Occurrence in Hemlock-Dominated and Deciduous-Dominated Forests of Central Appalachia L. E. Dodd University of Kentucky Z. Cornett University of Kentucky A. Smith L. K. Rieske University of Kentucky Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Dodd, L. E.; Cornett, Z.; Smith, A.; and Rieske, L. K. 2013. "Variation in Lepidopteran Occurrence in Hemlock-Dominated and Deciduous-Dominated Forests of Central Appalachia," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 46 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol46/iss1/1 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Dodd et al.: Variation in Lepidopteran Occurrence in Hemlock-Dominated and Dec 2013 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 1 Variation in Lepidopteran Occurrence in Hemlock-Dominated and Deciduous-Dominated Forests of Central Appalachia L. E. Dodd1,2,*, Z. Cornett1, A. Smith3, and L. K. Rieske1 Abstract Eastern hemlock, (Tsuga canadensis Carrière, Pinaceae), is threatened with extirpation by an exotic invasive herbivore, the hemlock woolly adelgid, (Adelges tsugae Annand, Homoptera: Adelgidae). Given this threat, a broader and more detailed knowledge of the community associated with eastern hem- lock is merited. As Lepidoptera are important members of forest communities, this study was initiated to determine the relative occurrence of Lepidoptera in hemlock-dominated and deciduous-dominated habitats by evaluating abundance, species richness, temporal variation, and composition overlap.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of Insects, Spiders, and Mites in the Air
    TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 673 MAY 1939 THE DISTRIBUTION OF INSECTS, SPIDERS, AND MITES IN THE AIR BY P. A. CLICK Assistant Entomolo^ist Division of Cotton Insect In^^estigations Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTUREJWAVSHINGTON, D. C. somi )r sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. Price 25 ccntt Technical Bulletin No. 673 May 1939 UNJIED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AQRIQULTURE WASHINGTON, D. C n THE DISTRIBUTION OF INSECTS, SPIDERS, AND MITES IN THE AIR ' By P. A. GLICK Assistant entomologist, Division of CMçtn Insect Investigations, Bureau of Ento- mology hndWlant Quarantine 2 CONTENTS Page Pasrt Introduction 1 Meteorological data—Continued Scope of the work '_l_^ Absolute humidity 101 The collecting ground ""' '" g Vapor pressure 102 Airplane insect traps ...... 6 Barometric pressure. _. .1 104 Operation and efläciency of the traps ' 8 Air currents---._._ "" log Seasonal distribution of insects 9 Light intensity "" 122 Altitudinal distribution of insects 12 Cloud conditions _ 126 Day collecting 12 Precipitation . _" 128 Night collecting 16 Electrical state of the atmosphere 129 Notes on the insects collected * 16 Effects of the Mississippi River flood of 1927 \Yinged forms _ 59 on the insect population of the air ISO Size, weight, and buoyancy _ 84 Seeds collected in the upper air __.. 132 Wingless insects 87 Collection of insects in Mexico 133 Immature stages _ 90 Sources of insects and routes of migration 140 Insects taken alive 91 Aircraft as insect carriers.-.-.. 141 Meteorological data _ 93 Collecting insects in the upper air 142 Temperature _.. 93 Summary 143 Dew point _ 98 Literature cited...
    [Show full text]