DOCSLIB.ORG

Klasifikátory Kosatců, Pivoněk a Denivek V Průhonické Botanické Zahradě

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Klasifikátory Kosatců, Pivoněk a Denivek V Průhonické Botanické Zahradě KLASIFIKÁTORY KOSATCŮ, PIVONĚK A DENIVEK V PRŮHONICKÉ BOTANICKÉ ZAHRADĚ Certifikovaná metodika DESCRIPTOR LISTS FOR IRISES, PEONIES AND DAYLILIES IN THE PRŮHONICE BOTANIC GARDEN Sekerka Pavel, Blažek Milan, Blažková Uljana, Caspers Zuzana, Macháčková Markéta, Fáberová Iva, Papoušková Ludmila, Matiska Pavel & Koudela Martin Klasifikátory kosatců, pivoněk a denivek v Průhonické botanické zahradě Sekerka Pavel1, Blažek M. 1, Blažková U. 1, Caspers Z. 1, Macháčková M. 1, Fáberová I.+ 2, Papoušková L. 2, Matiska P. 3, Koudela M. 3 1 Botanický ústav AV ČR, v.v.i., Zámek 1, 252 43 Průhonice 2 Výzkumný ústav rostlinné výroby, v.v.i., Drnovská 507, 161 06 Praha Ruzyně 3 Katedra zahradnictví, FAPPZ, Česká zemědělská univerzita v Praze, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha 6 Autoři textu: Sekerka Pavel, Blažek Milan, Blažková Uljana, Caspers Zuzana, Macháčková Markéta, Fáberová Iva, Papoušková Ludmila, Matiska Pavel, Koudela Martin Kontakt na vedoucího autorského kolektivu: [email protected] Autoři fotografií: Sekerka Pavel, Macháčková Markéta, Caspers Zuzana Autoři kreseb: Sekerka Pavel, Sekerková Zuzana a archiv autorů. Korektura anglického textu: Skálová Hana Recenze: Severa Michal Grafická úprava a sazba: Pavel Sekerka Vydal: Botanický ústav AV ČR, v.v.i., Zámek 1, 252 43 Průhonice v roce 2019 Tisk: Nová tiskárna Pelhřimov spol. s r.o., Krasíkovická 1787, 393 01 Pelhřimov Počet stran: 155 Náklad: 700 ISBN: 978-80-86188-60-7 Certifikovaná metodika byla uznána Ministerstvem zemědělství v souladu s podmínkami Metodiky hodnocení výzkumných organizací a programů účelové podpory výzkumu, vývoje a inovací pod osvědčením č. 65065/2019-MZE-18133 ze dne 11.12. 2019. Příspěvek vznikl v rámci řešení Národního programu konzervace a vyžívání genetických zdrojů rostlin, zvířat a mikroorganismů významných pro výživu a zemědělství č.j. 51834/2017-MZE-17253/6.2.15 a institucionálního projektu RVO 67985939. 2 Klasifikátory kosatců, pivoněk a denivek Úvod - Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Cíl metodiky - Aim of the methodology .................................................................................................................................. 4 KOSATCE (IRIS) .................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Poznámky k práci při tvorbě sbírek a verifikaci kultuních kosatců v Průhonické botanické zahradě. .......................... 6 Comments on collectioncreating s and on verification of cultivated irises in Průhonice botanic garden. ..................... 8 Kosatce s kartáčky ........................................................................................................................................................... 14 Stručný popis podrodu Iris (sekce Pogoniris, Oncocyclus a Regelia)......................................................................... 14 Brief description of subgenera Iris (section Iris) ........................................................................................................ 14 Porovnání s jinými klasifikátory - Comparison with other descriptor lists ................................................................. 15 Východiska, zdroje - Resources ................................................................................................................................. 16 Struktura klasifikátoru - Structure of Descriptor list .................................................................................................. 16 Popis a metodika hodnoceni znaků klasifikátoru ....................................................................................................... 17 KLASIFIKÁTOR - KOSATCE S KARTÁČKY ............................................................................................................. 21 KOSATCE BEZ KARTÁČKŮ - BEARDLESS IRISES ................................................................................................. 38 Stručný popis podrodů Limniris, Nepalensis a Pardanthopsis - Brief description of subgenera Limniris, Nepalensis and Pardanthopsis ...................................................................................................................................................... 38 Porovnání s jinými klasifikátory - Comparison with other descriptor lists ................................................................. 39 Východiska, zdroje - Resources ................................................................................................................................. 39 Struktura klasifikátoru - Structure of Descriptor list .................................................................................................. 40 Popis a metodika hodnoceni znaků klasifikátoru ....................................................................................................... 41 KLASIFIKÁTOR - KOSATCE BEZ KARTÁČKŮ ........................................................................................................ 46 PIVOŇKY (Paeonia) ............................................................................................................................................................ 77 Taxonomické a zahradnické členění pivoněk - Taxonomic and horticultural classification of peonies ...................... 78 Stručný popis rodu - Brief description of the genus ................................................................................................... 78 Východiska, zdroje - Background, sources ................................................................................................................ 79 Struktura klasifikátoru - Descriptor list structure ....................................................................................................... 79 Porovnání s jinými klasifikátory - Comparison with other descriptor lists ................................................................. 80 Popis a metodika hodnoceni znaků klasifikátoru ....................................................................................................... 81 KLASIFIKÁTOR - PIVOŇKY ....................................................................................................................................... 89 DENIVKY (Hemerocallis) .................................................................................................................................................. 111 Stručný popis rodu - Brief Description of the Genus ............................................................................................... 113 Východiska, zdroje - Resources ............................................................................................................................... 113 Struktura klasifikátoru - Descriptor list Structure ..................................................................................................... 114 Porovnání s jinými klasifikátory - Comparison with other descriptor lists ............................................................... 115 Popis a metodika hodnoceni znaků klasifikátoru ..................................................................................................... 115 KLASIFIKÁTOR - DENIVKY ..................................................................................................................................... 126 Srovnání novosti postupů - Comparison of novelty procedures ........................................................................................... 149 Popis uplatnění metodiky - Description of methodology use ............................................................................................... 149 Ekonomické aspekty - Economic aspects ............................................................................................................................ 150 Závěr - Conclusion .............................................................................................................................................................. 152 Seznam použité související literatury ................................................................................................................................... 153 Seznam publikací, které předcházely metodice .................................................................................................................... 155 Dedikace .............................................................................................................................................................................. 155 Jména oponentů (kteří zpracovali posudky) a názvy jejich organizací. ................................................................................ 155 3 Úvod - Introduction V roce 2015 bylo Radou genetických zdrojů odsouhlaseno rozšíření kolekcí genetických zdrojů Národního programu genetických zdrojů Rostlin o rody Hemerocallis (denivka) a Paeonia (pivoňka). Kromě výběru rostlin, vhodných pro zařazení do Národního programu, jsme začali postupně ve spolupráci se studenty Katedry zahradnictví FAPPZ České zemědělské univerzity v Praze připravovat klasifikátory pro tyto rody. Klasifikátor měl umožnit popis jak botanických znaků planých druhů, protože plané druhy pivoněk a denivek jsou rostliny LAKR a je tedy vhodné je zařadit do Národního programu, tak i pokročilých zahradních okrasných odrůd. Současně se ukázalo, že námi používaný klasifikátor pro kosatce je koncipovaný především pro
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Radiation in the Cape Flora and the Phylogeny of Peacock Irises Moraea
    ARTICLE IN PRESS MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution xxx (2002) xxx–xxx www.academicpress.com Radiation in the Cape flora and the phylogeny of peacock irises Moraea (Iridaceae) based on four plastid DNA regions Peter Goldblatt,a Vincent Savolainen,b,* Obie Porteous,b Ivan Sostaric,b Martyn Powell,b Gail Reeves,c John C. Manning,c Timothy G. Barraclough,d and Mark W. Chaseb a Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166, USA b Molecular Systematics Section, Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond TW9 3DS, UK c National Botanical Institute, Kirstenbosch, Private Bag X7, Cape Town, South Africa d Department of Biology and NERC Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, UK Received 2 February 2002; received in revised form 22 April 2002 Abstract Phylogenetic analyses of four plastid DNA regions, the rbcL exon, trnL intron, trnL–trnF intergenic spacer, and rps16 intron from each of 73 species in the African genus Moraea (Iridaceae: Irideae) including accessions of all major species clusters in the genus, show Moraea to be paraphyletic when Barnardiella, Galaxia, Hexaglottis, Homeria (all southern African), and Gynandriris (Eurasian as well) were recognized as separate genera. There are several small, isolated species clusters at the basal nodes of the tree that are all restricted to the winter-rainfall zone of southern Africa (the Greater Cape floral kingdom) and a few, highly derived, large species groups that have radiated extensively within the winter-rainfall zone. Mapping of floral traits shows that an Iris-type flower is ancestral in Moraea.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Acanthus Dioscoridis Acanthaceae 2 Blepharis Persica Acanthaceae 3
    Row Species Name Family 1 Acanthus dioscoridis Acanthaceae 2 Blepharis persica Acanthaceae 3 Acer mazandaranicum Aceraceae 4 Acer monspessulanum subsp. persicum Aceraceae 5 Acer monspessulanum subsp. assyriacum Aceraceae 6 Acer monspessulanum subsp. cinerascens Aceraceae 7 Acer monspessulanum subsp. turcomanicum Aceraceae 8 Acer tataricum Aceraceae 9 Acer campestre Aceraceae 10 Acer cappadocicum Aceraceae 11 Acer monspessulanum subsp. ibericum Aceraceae 12 Acer hyrcanum Aceraceae 13 Acer platanoides Aceraceae 14 Acer velutinum Aceraceae 15 Aizoon hispanicum Aizoaceae 16 Mesembryanthemum nodiflorum Aizoaceae 17 Sesuvium verrucosum Aizoaceae 18 Zaleya govindia Aizoaceae 19 Aizoon canariense Aizoaceae 20 Alisma gramineum Alismataceae 21 Damasonium alisma Alismataceae 22 Alisma lanceolatum Alismataceae 23 Alisma plantago-aquatica Alismataceae 24 Sagittaria trifolia Alismataceae 25 Allium assadii Alliaceae Row Species Name Family 26 Allium breviscapum Alliaceae 27 Allium bungei Alliaceae 28 Allium chloroneurum Alliaceae 29 Allium ellisii Alliaceae 30 Allium esfandiarii Alliaceae 31 Allium fedtschenkoi Alliaceae 32 Allium hirtifolium Alliaceae 33 Allium kirindicum Alliaceae 34 Allium kotschyi Alliaceae 35 Allium lalesaricum Alliaceae 36 Allium longivaginatum Alliaceae 37 Allium minutiflorum Alliaceae 38 Allium shelkovnikovii Alliaceae 39 Allium subnotabile Alliaceae 40 Allium subvineale Alliaceae 41 Allium wendelboi Alliaceae 42 Nectaroscordum koelzii Alliaceae 43 Allium akaka Alliaceae 44 Allium altissimum Alliaceae 45 Allium ampeloprasum subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns in Evolution in Characters That Define Iris Subgenera And
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 22 | Issue 1 Article 34 2006 Patterns in Evolution in Characters That Define rI is Subgenera and Sections Carol A. Wilson Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Wilson, Carol A. (2006) "Patterns in Evolution in Characters That Define rI is Subgenera and Sections," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 22: Iss. 1, Article 34. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol22/iss1/34 Aliso 22, pp. 425-433 © 2006, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden PATTERNS OF EVOLUTION IN CHARACTERS THAT DEFINE IRIS SUBGENERA AND SECTIONS CAROL A. WILSON Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 1500 North College Avenue, Claremont, California 91711-3157, USA (carol. wilson@ cgu. edu) ABSTRACT Subgeneric groups have been circumscribed in Iris based on a small number of morphological characters. Recent DNA sequence data has indicated that several of the subgenera, sections, and series that have previously been delineated are paraphyletic or polyphyletic. The evolution of characters that have traditionally been used to distinguish sub generic and sectional groups within Iris was investigated by mapping these characters on a phylogenetic tree based on matK sequence data. Results indicate that rhizomes are pleisomorphic for the genus and that three bulb types have arisen independently. My analysis shows that sepal beards, sepal crests, and seed arils show extensive homoplasy. Most of the homoplasy seen is associated with the circumscription of polyphyletic subgeneric groups such as the beardless subgenus Limniris. Some additional homoplasy is due to diversity within supported clades or the historical use of a single character in circumscribing more than one subgeneric group.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2014 Cal-Sibe Siblings
    Pacific Iris Almanac of the Society for Pacific Coast Native Iris www.pacificcoastiris.org Volume 42 No 2 Spring 2014 Cal-Sibe siblings 'Golden Waves', top, and 'Lyric Laughter', bottom, are sibling Cal-Sibes from the same cross, between a yellow-flowered seedling of I. forrestii and I. innominata. Jean Witt noted that the Siberian parent was a yellow 40 chromosome Siberian seedling, closer in form and color to I. forrestii than to I. wilsonii. The SIGNA Checklist states that the Siberian parent was I. wilsonii. Jean reviewed her notes, and said this is incorrect, it was a forrestii seedling. Year of registration: 1979 for ‗Golden Waves‘, 1988 for ‗Lyric Laughter‘, both by Jean Witt Photographs: Jean Witt Pacific Iris, Almanac of the Society for Pacific Coast Native Iris Volume XXXX1I Number 2 Spring 2014 SPCNI MEMBERSHIP The Society for Pacific Coast Native Irises (SPCNI) is a section of the American Iris Society (AIS). Membership in AIS is recommended but not required for membership in SPCNI. US Overseas Annual, paper $15.00 $18.00 Triennial, paper $40.00 $48.00 Annual, digital $7.00 $7.00 Triennial, digital $19.00 $19.00 Lengthier memberships are no longer available. Please send membership fees to the SPCNI Treasurer. Use Paypal to join SPCNI online at http://pacificcoastiris.org/JoinOnline.htm International currencies accepted IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM THE SECRETARY/TREASURER ABOUT DUES NOTICES Members who get paper copies, please keep track of the expiration date of your member- ship, which is printed on your Almanac address label. We include a letter with your last issue, and may follow this with an email notice, if you have email.
    [Show full text]
  • Ekonomik Önemi.Pdf
    INTRODUCTION OF ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT BULBOUS PLANTS COLLECTED FROM WILD FLORA IN SEMI ARID CLIMATIC CONDITIONS OF SOUTHEASTERN ANATOLIAN REGION OF TURKEY Süleyman KIZIL1, Khalid Mahmood KHAWAR2 and Neşet ARSLAN2 1 Department of Field Crops, Agriculture Faculty, Dicle University, 21280 Diyarbakir, Turkey 2 Department of Field Crops, Agriculture Faculty, Ankara University, 06100 Ankara, Turkey Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Turkey has rich biodiversity due to its topography comprising of plains, plateaus and mountainous regions that have contributed to enrichment of its flora including bulbous plants. Many among these have potential for use in pharmaceutical and ornamental plant industries. However, owing to lack of proper research many among these plants are yet to be evaluated for commercial propagation. Leaves, bulbs and flowers among many plant parts are being evaluated locally as salads, vegetables, products of pharmaceutical importance and flowers for use in cut flower and ornamental plant industries. The study aimed to find economically important plant geophytes that grow in the wild of the South Eastern Anatolian climatic zones. To meet the objective, a field survey of bulbous geophytes of South Eastern and Eastern Anatolia was carried out during April-July periods of 2011 and 2012 years. The survey results indicated distribution of bulb geophytes at altitudes of 640 to 2651m. The geophytes belonging to the genus Allium, Biarum, Bellevalia, Crocus, Eranthis, Fritillaria, Gladiolus, Hyacinthus, Iris, Ixillirion, Muscari, Narcissus, Ornithogalum, Sternbergia, Scilla, Tulipa, Ophyrs and Orchis were collected. After initial screening, it was decided to culture 40 species; the bulbs of these species were planted in the collection gardens of the Department of Field Crops, Dicle University, Diyarbakir for determination of several parameters including, flowering date, duration of flowering time and other agronomical characteristics important for bulbous species.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish Silk Road Trip Report 2019
    TURKISH SILK ROAD TRIP REPORT 2019 1 Day 1 6 May To Goreme We all arrived from various places to Cappadocia. Day 2 7 May Cappadocia I A fine clear morning revealed the remarkable convoluted landscape of Cappadocia – a blend of towers and smooth-eroded hills, some pink some cream. We met with our guide Gaye and set off for a quieter part of this popular region. Our first stop was near a small church and above this the path led to a fine lookout across the landscape including some amazing chimneys capped with dark hats of denser rock. Indeed, it is the rapid erosion of the various layers of compacted ash that have created this landscape, a legacy of the regions intensely volcanic past. There many Alpine Swifts sweeping overhead and a few interesting flowers with tufts of bluish Trigonella coerulescens, Silene conoidea, Euphorbia sp and big patches of Eruca sativa that were a magnet for the many Painted Ladies on the wing. We moved on to another site with an old monastery that still retained some very old frescoes and painted ceilings as well as a very old Seljuk mosque. Here there was plentiful Hypercoum pseudograndiflorum along the paths. Uta exchanged tips on bean cultivation with a local farmer who spoke a smattering of German before we left. Lunch was in a cherry orchard, thronging with butterflies as well as by chance, being next to a nesting Long-eared Owl which peered down at us the whole time we were there. Then it was onto see a special plant, crossing the undulating steppes and wheat fields to an innocuous-looking hill.
    [Show full text]
  • Iris Sibirica and Others Iris Albicans Known As Cemetery
    Iris Sibirica and others Iris Albicans Known as Cemetery Iris as is planted on Muslim cemeteries. Two different species use this name; the commoner is just a white form of Iris germanica, widespread in the Mediterranean. This is widely available in the horticultural trade under the name of albicans, but it is not true to name. True Iris albicans which we are offering here occurs only in Arabia and Yemen. It is some 60cm tall, with greyish leaves and one to three, strongly and sweetly scented, 9cm flowers. The petals are pure, bone- white. The bracts are pale green. (The commoner interloper is found across the Mediterranean basin and is not entitled to the name, which continues in use however. The wrongly named albicans, has brown, papery bracts, and off-white flowers). Our stock was first found near Sana’a, Yemen and is thriving here, outside, in a sunny, raised bed. Iris Sibirica and others Iris chrysographes Black Form Clumps of narrow, iris-like foliage. Tall sprays of darkest violet to almost black velvety flowers, Jun-Sept. Ht 40cm. Moist, well drained soil. Part shade. Deepest Purple which is virtually indistinguishable from black. Moist soil. Ht. 50cm Iris chrysographes Dykes (William Rickatson Dykes, 1911, China); Section Limniris, Series Sibericae; 14-18" (35-45 cm), B7D; Flowers dark reddish violet with gold streaks in the signal area giving it its name (golden writing); Collected by E. H. Wilson in 1908, in China; The Gardeners' Chronicle 49: 362. 1911. The Curtis's Botanical Magazine. tab. 8433 in 1912, gives the following information along with the color illustration.
    [Show full text]
  • PB–219 Iris Tuberosa Var. Longifolia (Iridaceae) Üzerine Sistematik Notlar Ve Yeni Bir Yayılış Alanı
    bornmuelleri, Gypsophila leucochlaena, Ebenus depressa, Verbascum melitenensis, Astragalus melitenensis, Astragalus scabrifolius, Reseda tomentosa, Aethionema lepidioides, Acanthophyllum oppositiflorum, Muscari discolor, Dianthus masmenaeus, Silene akmaniana, Minuartia corymbulosa var. gypsophylloides taksonlarıdır. Türlere ait bilgiler Türkiye florası ve Türkiye Bitkileri Kırmızı Kitabı’na göre incelenmiştir. Bulgular: İç Anadolu Bölgesi ile Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi arasında geçiş teşkil eden Tohma Çayı Vadisi ve çevresinde kurulu olan Darende İlçesi, bozkır bitki örtüsüyle kaplıdır. Şiddetli bir kuraklığın hüküm sürdüğü bölgede erozyon üst seviyededir ve bunun sonucunda kuraklığa dayanıklı bitkiler yaygın olarak bulunmaktadır. Aşırı otlatma ciddi habitat tahribatına neden olmakta ve bu alanlardaki bitkilerin populasyonlarını etkilemektedir. İnsan kullanımından kaynaklanan etkenlerin habitat bozulmalarını artırdığı görülmüştür. Örneğin Akçatoprak mevkiinde ağaçlandırma çalışmaları, Hekimhan yolu üzerinde çöp tesisi ve ağaçlandırma yapılması aynı alandaki birçok türün yaşamını tehlikeye atmaktadır. Önlem alınmadığı takdirde birçok türün nesli tehlike altına girebilir. Centaurea brevifimbriata 5 noktada, Fumana trisperma 3 noktada, Astragalus scabrifolius 2 noktada, Gypsophila leucochlaena, Reseda tomentosa 2 noktada, Acanthophyllum oppositiflorum, Klasea bornmuelleri ve Aethionema lepidioides 1 noktada bulunur. Bu türlerin birey sayıları 100-5000 arasında değişmektedir. Diğer türler daha geniş yayılışlıdır. Bu türlerden bazıları ilk kez fotoğraflanmıştır.
    [Show full text]
  • Iris Iberica Subsp. Elegantissima from a Very Diverse Population in Southern Georgia
    Iris iberica subsp. elegantissima from a very diverse population in southern Georgia 118 Rock Garden Quarterly Vol. 69 (2) INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE done both, will say that the joy of growing select plants is rivaled (if not overtaken) by the joy of seeing �them in their native places. Just seeing the plants was spectacular. I will go back, but, evoking the murmur of nostalgia from this year, I look forward to incorporating Caucasian plants into my garden throughout my life. KENTON J SETH Backpacking for around the Caucasus Having left a job in public horticulture, and taking advantage of my freedom from the high needs of plants in the growing season, feeling very much like a tired fatherflowers leaving his ten children at a baby-sitter before a holiday, I sought to see some of those very plants in their native places. I bought a one-way ticket in spring 2010 to Tbilisi, the capital of the Republic of Georgia. This was the starting point of a summer's-worth of travel including Georgia, Armenia, and Turkey. I knew I would get to see fine plants easily enough, but didn't want to set myself up for disappointment if I did not visit my Holy Grail plants like local Tulipa, Onco Iris, and the endemic Fritillaria orientalis. 119119 Sparing the reader interesting yet horribly exhaustive details, about the serious logistics and hysterical in-betweens, I do want to note that the plants, places, and people I saw, happened as a mix of plan and accident. I traveled, at times alone, at times with foreign friends old and new, and once with the fortuitous companionship of a troop of international horticulturists, including the late great Jim Archibald, for whom I have much to thank.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Services and Their Role in Poverty Alleviation in Armenia - a Case Study of Karaberd Gold Mine
    UNDP/UNEP “Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services” Technical Assistance Project The report is prepared for United Nations Development Programme in Armenia within the frame of the project “Economic Valuation of ecosystem Services in Armenia”. The project is funded under umbrella of United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) joint global Poverty and Environment Initiative (PEI) and aims to contribute to poverty reduction and improved well-being of poor and vulnerable groups through mainstreaming the environment into national development processes Ecosystem Services and their Role in Poverty Alleviation in Armenia - A Case Study of Karaberd Gold Mine Final Report February 2014 This report has been developed in the scope of UNDP/UNEP join joint TA Project “Economic Valuation of ecosystem Services in Armenia” Implementing agency UNDP UNDP EG Portfolio Analyst Armen Marirosyan UNDP Programme Policy Adviser, EG portfolio, Project Georgi Arzumanyan coordinator UNDP Project Assistant Kristina Tereshchatova Project team: Project international consultant Camille Bann Project task leader Anastas Aghazaryan Project experts Davit Androyan Vram Tevosyan Lothar Guendling Georgi Fayvush Hrant Avetisyan Armen Amiryan Aida Tarloyan Armen Ghazaryan Arman Kandaryan Mikayel Avagyan Address: 14 Petros Adamyan str., 0010 Yerevan, Armenia UNDP Armenia Tel: (374 60) 530000; Fax: (+374 10) 543811 Web Site: http://www.am.undp.org E-mail: [email protected] 2 List of abbreviations EIE Environmental Impact Expertise
    [Show full text]
  • Dietes Iridioides Subsp. Angolensis from Angola and Dietes Bicolor Subsp
    Page 1 of 6 Original Research Two new subspecies of Dietes (Iridaceae: Iridoideae), Dietes iridioides subsp. angolensis from Angola and Dietes bicolor subsp. armeniaca from eastern South Africa, with notes and range extensions for Dietes butcheriana and Dietes iridioides Authors: Background: Recent collections of Dietes have extended the known geographical range and 1 Peter Goldblatt morphological variation in several species. John C. Manning1,2 Objectives: To describe additional taxa in Dietes to reflect the morphological and geographical Affiliations: variation in the species more accurately and to record significant range extensions. 1Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, Method: Recent collections were compared with existing herbarium material and published University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa literature. Results: Two new subspecies in Dietes are described, viz. Dietes iridioides subsp. angolensis 2South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape from Angola, constituting the first record of the species from that country, andDietes bicolor Town, South Africa subsp. armeniaca from eastern South Africa, which represents a range extension into southern KwaZulu-Natal. We also document a range extension for the local endemic Dietes butcheriana Correspondence to: from KwaZulu-Natal into the Eastern Cape and discuss an anomalous population of Peter Goldblatt D. iridioides, with long-lived flowers, from near Hankey in the Eastern Cape. Email: [email protected] Conclusions: The range extensions and new infraspecific taxa increase our understanding of the diversity of Dietes in southern and south tropical Africa. Postal address: PO Box 299, 63166 St. Louis, United States of America Introduction Dates: With five species in sub-Saharan Africa and one on Lord Howe Island (Australasia), Dietes Salisb.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomenclatural Types of Iberian Irises (Iris and Related Genera, Iridaceae)
    Flora Montiberica 53: 49-62 (18-XII-2012). ISSN: 1988-799X NOMENCLATURAL TYPES OF IBERIAN IRISES (IRIS AND RELATED GENERA, IRIDACEAE) Manuel B. CRESPO VILLALBA CIBIO, Instituto de la Biodiversidad. Universidad de Alicante. P.O. Box 99. E-03080 Alicante. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Nomenclatural types are reported for seventeen taxa belonging to Iris and six related genera, which are accepted in the forthcoming treatment of Iridaceae for Flora iberica. Among them, 13 lectotypes and one neotype are designated for the first time, and three previous typifications are briefly commented. Keywords: Iris, Chamaeiris, Juno, Limniris, Xiphion, Hermodactylus, Gynandriris, nomenclature, typi- fication, Iberian Peninsula. RESUMEN: Tipos nomenclaturales de lirios ibéricos (Iris y géneros relaciona- dos, Iridaceaae). Se presentan los tipos nomenclaturales de 17 táxones pertenecientes a Iris y otros seis géneros relacionados, que se aceptan en el tratamiento de las Iridace- ae para Flora iberica. De ellos, se designan por primera vez 13 lectótipos y un neótipo, y se comentan brevemente tres tipificaciones previas. Palabras clave: Iris, Chamaei- ris, Juno, Limniris, Xiphion, Hermodactylus, Gynandriris, nomenclatura, tipificación, Península Ibérica. INTRODUCTION others), whereas others were accepted as separate genera (cf. PARLATORE, 1860; Iridaceae will be included in the KLATT, 1864, 1866; BAKER, 1877; forthcoming volume XX of Flora iberica. VALENTINE, 1980; RODIONENKO, As a part of the editorial task, data on no- 1961, 2005, 2007, 2009; MAVRODIEV, menclatural types will be reported for all 2010; among others). accepted taxa in the family. Some of the In any case, important morphological species occurring in the Iberian Peninsula differences exist among those seven ag- have already been typified, though many gregates, which allow recognition of uni- irises are still in need of typification.
    [Show full text]