DOCSLIB.ORG

The Species Problem - Ongoing Issues

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Species Problem - Ongoing Issues THE SPECIES PROBLEM - ONGOING ISSUES Edited by Igor Ya. Pavlinov The Species Problem - Ongoing Issues http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/3313 Edited by Igor Ya. Pavlinov Contributors Richard Mayden, Kirk Fitzhugh, Igor Pavlinov, Jack W. Sites, Jr., Larissa Vasilyeva, Steven Stephenson, Richard Richards, Victor Shcherbakov, David N. Stamos, James Staley, Friedmann Vladimir Published by InTech Janeza Trdine 9, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia Copyright © 2013 InTech All chapters are Open Access distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles even for commercial purposes, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. After this work has been published by InTech, authors have the right to republish it, in whole or part, in any publication of which they are the author, and to make other personal use of the work. Any republication, referencing or personal use of the work must explicitly identify the original source. Notice Statements and opinions expressed in the chapters are these of the individual contributors and not necessarily those of the editors or publisher. No responsibility is accepted for the accuracy of information contained in the published chapters. The publisher assumes no responsibility for any damage or injury to persons or property arising out of the use of any materials, instructions, methods or ideas contained in the book. Publishing Process Manager Dragana Manestar Technical Editor InTech DTP team Cover InTech Design team First published February, 2013 Printed in Croatia A free online edition of this book is available at www.intechopen.com Additional hard copies can be obtained from [email protected] The Species Problem - Ongoing Issues, Edited by Igor Ya. Pavlinov p. cm. ISBN 978-953-51-0957-0 free online editions of InTech Books and Journals can be found at www.intechopen.com Contents Preface VII Section 1 Introductory 1 Chapter 1 The Species Problem, Why Again? 3 Igor Ya. Pavlinov Section 2 Conceptual Issues 39 Chapter 2 The Species Problem: A Conceptual Problem? 41 Richard A. Richards Chapter 3 Biological Species as a Form of Existence, the Higher Form 65 Victor Prokhorovich Shcherbakov Chapter 4 Defining ‘Species,’ ‘Biodiversity,’ and ‘Conservation’ by Their Transitive Relation 93 Kirk Fitzhugh Chapter 5 Transitioning Toward a Universal Species Concept for the Classification of all Organisms 131 James T. Staley Chapter 6 An Essentialistic View of the Species Problem 141 Larissa N. Vasilyeva and Steven L. Stephenson Chapter 7 Species, Trees, Characters, and Concepts: Ongoing Issues, Diverse Ideologies, and a Time for Reflection and Change 171 Richard L. Mayden VI Contents Chapter 8 Conspecific Recognition Systems and the Rehabilitation of the Biological Species Concept in Ornithology 193 V. S. Friedmann Chapter 9 Species Delimitation: A Decade After the Renaissance 225 Arley Camargo and Jack Jr. Sites Section 3 Historical Issue 249 Chapter 10 Darwin’s Species Concept Revisited 251 David N. Stamos Preface Each branch of knowledge, if it is burdened with at least some portion of metaphysics and natur-philosophy, possesses a kind of “eternal problems”. They are both, “problems” and “eternal” because of the lack of trivial and unambiguous ultimate answers to the funda‐ mental questions such as “what” and “why” are there things of such and such kind in Na‐ ture. Any attempt of escaping them by putting and answering the question “how” and using some operational means, reduces science to technology of counting and measuring. In biology, one of the most fundamental burdens is the species problem; so in this sense, it is actually both the “problem” and “eternal”. This is reflected in the endless stream of pub‐ lications on the species subject, be they either (nature)philosophical issues of the “why” kind (why is there the species), or biological searches of the “what” kind (what are the spe‐ cies of particular organisms), or operational treatments of the “how” kind (how to count the species). In the last decades we have been witnessing appearance of several important landmark papers, monographs and collections on the species problem [1–16] stimulated by new rise of interest of the scientific community to the above old questions of “what” and “why” and occasionally of “how” regarding the species and forming together the problem of the same name. The present book provides another collection of papers on the species problem. It doesn’t pretend neither to be a kind of ‘landmark”, to reflect the current state of the problem in question nor to concentrate on some of its aspects. Rather, this book was initially designed as a forum for exposing ideas, which may provide a look at the species problem not fitting the “recognized” pattern(s). The book includes ten chapters with pretty high theoretical content which are pretty diverse in their subjects; they are divided more or less convention‐ ally between three sections, with most of them being placed in the “Conceptual Issues” sec‐ tion. The “Introductory” section opening the book includes the editor’s (Igor Ya. Pavlinov) chap‐ ter with a self-explaining title “The species problem, why again?“. Its focal point is consid‐ eration of the species problem from the standpoint of the modern non-classical science paradigm, with ontological relativity and subjective inherency being its central themes. Ac‐ cordingly, he concentrates on consideration of this problem in the context of three-parti‐ tioned cognitive situation, within which the entire species problem outlines a conceptual space of certain kind, with particular species concepts being its subspaces allowable to be treated as specific onto-epistemological models. It is stressed that the latter are ordered into a conceptual pyramid of various levels of generality, an “ultimate beginner” of which is supposed to be a kind of synergetic model of the evolving biota. Species ontological plural‐ ism is stressed, which follows from acknowledging gradual divergent evolution of the VIII Preface “specieshood” resulted in the latter’s different manifestations in different groups of organ‐ isms according to their particular life strategies. Richard A. Richards, in his chapter “The species problem: A conceptual problem?”, devel‐ ops some of just above ideas in somewhat more sophisticated manner. His main point is to clarify, whether the species problem is conceptual (theoretical) or empirical one, and his answer is decisively in favor of the first version. Richards consequently considers the prob‐ lem in question from standpoint of the conceptual framework (another term for the above conceptual space), his general attitude is principally monistic. So he asserts it that there is (or should be) a kind of a single general species concept corresponding to some “definition‐ al core” of that framework, with its different aspects belonging to the latter’s “descriptive periphery” corresponding to various particular species concepts. The main theme of Victor P. Shcherbakov’s chapter “Biological species as a form of exis‐ tence, the higher form” is rather naturphilosophical. He tries to explain an emergence and existence of the species of living beings, in its most general meaning, as a particular discrete unit at a particular level of generality within the hierarchically patterned Universe. He in‐ formally defined the species as a multiorganismic self-reproducing entity endowed with a kind of “substantive existence” due to specific interaction of its tokens (organisms). An ulti‐ mate conclusion of the chapter is that the species as a “higher form of existence” emerged in course of historical development of the living matter as an entity possessing, in contrast to particular organisms, a possibility to both change (to evolve) and to remain “itself” (to persist) potentially eternally. The chapter of Kirk Fitzhugh “Defining ‘species,’ ‘biodiversity,’ and ‘conservation’ by their transitive relations” concentrates around consideration of the species as a particular (with no special status) case of the taxon defined as an abductively inferred class of explanatory hypotheses (not ontological individuals) accounting for particular characters distributions among observed organisms. Such a basically epistemological concern of the species leads to a tentative definition of the latter as an explanatory account of occurrences of similar char‐ acter(s) among individuals by way of character origin and subsequent fixation. Interesting is Fitzhugh’s reconsideration of the biodiversity and conservation concepts based on his non-trivial understanding of the species. For him, biodiversity is a metaphor for the hy‐ potheses of taxa (species in particular) as surrogates for hypotheses of the past, proximate tokogeny; this makes the very notion of biodiversity redundant relative to the notion of taxa. Respectively, from such a standpoint, conservation does not “conserve” species or taxa, but ensures that circumscribed sets of organisms would continue tokogeny into the future. James T. Staley begins his chapter “Transitioning toward a universal species concept for the classification of all organisms” with a statement that development of a uniform species con‐ cept that applies to all organisms is one the most important goals in biology. He justly be‐ lieves that, for a species concept to be actually universal, it has to be applied to all and any kinds of organisms including prokaryotes. Taking the latter as a “standard” for considering various species concepts, he comes to a conclusion that the phylogenomic species concept could become accepted as such a sought universal species concept. Larissa Vasilieva’s & Steven L. Stephenson’s chapter “An essentialistic view of the species problem” consider the latter from a typological taxonomic standpoint. They try to re-vital‐ ize an essentialistic view of the species problem, emphasizing (with reference to E. Sober) Preface IX that it is most compatible with the individual treatment of the species. Their general pre‐ sumption is that majority of the existing species concepts are based upon within-species processes and relationships and therefore are inconsistent.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Laboratory Primate Newsletter
    LABORATORY PRIMATE NEWSLETTER Vol. 45, No. 3 July 2006 JUDITH E. SCHRIER, EDITOR JAMES S. HARPER, GORDON J. HANKINSON AND LARRY HULSEBOS, ASSOCIATE EDITORS MORRIS L. POVAR, CONSULTING EDITOR ELVA MATHIESEN, ASSISTANT EDITOR ALLAN M. SCHRIER, FOUNDING EDITOR, 1962-1987 Published Quarterly by the Schrier Research Laboratory Psychology Department, Brown University Providence, Rhode Island ISSN 0023-6861 POLICY STATEMENT The Laboratory Primate Newsletter provides a central source of information about nonhuman primates and re- lated matters to scientists who use these animals in their research and those whose work supports such research. The Newsletter (1) provides information on care and breeding of nonhuman primates for laboratory research, (2) dis- seminates general information and news about the world of primate research (such as announcements of meetings, research projects, sources of information, nomenclature changes), (3) helps meet the special research needs of indi- vidual investigators by publishing requests for research material or for information related to specific research prob- lems, and (4) serves the cause of conservation of nonhuman primates by publishing information on that topic. As a rule, research articles or summaries accepted for the Newsletter have some practical implications or provide general information likely to be of interest to investigators in a variety of areas of primate research. However, special con- sideration will be given to articles containing data on primates not conveniently publishable elsewhere. General descriptions of current research projects on primates will also be welcome. The Newsletter appears quarterly and is intended primarily for persons doing research with nonhuman primates. Back issues may be purchased for $5.00 each.
    [Show full text]
  • 71St Annual Meeting Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Paris Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 2 – 5, 2011 SESSION CONCURRENT SESSION CONCURRENT
    ISSN 1937-2809 online Journal of Supplement to the November 2011 Vertebrate Paleontology Vertebrate Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Society of Vertebrate 71st Annual Meeting Paleontology Society of Vertebrate Las Vegas Paris Nevada, USA Las Vegas, November 2 – 5, 2011 Program and Abstracts Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 71st Annual Meeting Program and Abstracts COMMITTEE MEETING ROOM POSTER SESSION/ CONCURRENT CONCURRENT SESSION EXHIBITS SESSION COMMITTEE MEETING ROOMS AUCTION EVENT REGISTRATION, CONCURRENT MERCHANDISE SESSION LOUNGE, EDUCATION & OUTREACH SPEAKER READY COMMITTEE MEETING POSTER SESSION ROOM ROOM SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS SEVENTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING PARIS LAS VEGAS HOTEL LAS VEGAS, NV, USA NOVEMBER 2–5, 2011 HOST COMMITTEE Stephen Rowland, Co-Chair; Aubrey Bonde, Co-Chair; Joshua Bonde; David Elliott; Lee Hall; Jerry Harris; Andrew Milner; Eric Roberts EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Philip Currie, President; Blaire Van Valkenburgh, Past President; Catherine Forster, Vice President; Christopher Bell, Secretary; Ted Vlamis, Treasurer; Julia Clarke, Member at Large; Kristina Curry Rogers, Member at Large; Lars Werdelin, Member at Large SYMPOSIUM CONVENORS Roger B.J. Benson, Richard J. Butler, Nadia B. Fröbisch, Hans C.E. Larsson, Mark A. Loewen, Philip D. Mannion, Jim I. Mead, Eric M. Roberts, Scott D. Sampson, Eric D. Scott, Kathleen Springer PROGRAM COMMITTEE Jonathan Bloch, Co-Chair; Anjali Goswami, Co-Chair; Jason Anderson; Paul Barrett; Brian Beatty; Kerin Claeson; Kristina Curry Rogers; Ted Daeschler; David Evans; David Fox; Nadia B. Fröbisch; Christian Kammerer; Johannes Müller; Emily Rayfield; William Sanders; Bruce Shockey; Mary Silcox; Michelle Stocker; Rebecca Terry November 2011—PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS 1 Members and Friends of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, The Host Committee cordially welcomes you to the 71st Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology in Las Vegas.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA: Birding the Roof of Africa; with Southern Extension a Tropical Birding Set Departure
    ETHIOPIA: Birding the Roof of Africa; with Southern Extension A Tropical Birding Set Departure February 7 – March 1, 2010 Guide: Ken Behrens All photos taken by Ken Behrens during this trip ORIENTATION I have chosen to use a different format for this trip report. First, comes a general introduction to Ethiopia. The text of this section is largely drawn from the recently published Birding Ethiopia, authored by Keith Barnes, Christian, Boix and I. For more information on the book, check out http://www.lynxeds.com/product/birding-ethiopia. After the country introduction comes a summary of the highlights of this tour. Next comes a day-by-day itinerary. Finally, there is an annotated bird list and a mammal list. ETHIOPIA INTRODUCTION Many people imagine Ethiopia as a flat, famine- ridden desert, but this is far from the case. Ethiopia is remarkably diverse, and unexpectedly lush. This is the ʻroof of Africaʼ, holding the continentʼs largest and most contiguous mountain ranges, and some of its tallest peaks. Cleaving the mountains is the Great Rift Valley, which is dotted with beautiful lakes. Towards the borders of the country lie stretches of dry scrub that are more like the desert most people imagine. But even in this arid savanna, diversity is high, and the desert explodes into verdure during the rainy season. The diversity of Ethiopiaʼs landscapes supports a parallel diversity of birds and other wildlife, and although birds are the focus of our tour, there is much more to the country. Ethiopia is the only country in Africa that was never systematically colonized, and Rueppell’s Robin-Chat, a bird of the Ethiopian mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolutive Dynamic of the Bank Vole (Myodes Glareolus): Spatial
    The evolutive dynamic of the bank vole (Myodes glareolus) : Spatial structure of the morphometric variations Ronan Ledevin To cite this version: Ronan Ledevin. The evolutive dynamic of the bank vole (Myodes glareolus) : Spatial structure of the morphometric variations. Paleontology. Université Claude Bernard - Lyon I, 2010. English. NNT : 2010LYO10196. tel-00832801 HAL Id: tel-00832801 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00832801 Submitted on 11 Jun 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. N° d’ordre : 196 - 2010 Année 2010 THESE Présentée devant l’UNIVERSITE CLAUDE BERNARD – LYON 1 pour l’obtention du DIPLOME DE DOCTORAT (arrêté du 7 août 2006) Présentée et soutenue publiquement le 25 Octobre 2010 Par M. Ronan LEDEVIN La dynamique évolutive du campagnol roussâtre (Myodes glareolus) : structure spatiale des variations morphométriques Jury Rapporteurs : M. J.-C. AUFFRAY : Directeur de Recherche (Université de Montpellier II) M. A. CARDINI : Lecturer (Universitá di Modena e Reggio Emilia) Examinateurs : Mme D. PONTIER : Professeur des Universités (Université de Lyon I) M. J. R. MICHAUX : Chercheur Qualifié (Université de Liège, en accueil au CBGP de Montpellier) Directeur de Thèse : Mme S. RENAUD : Chargé de Recherche (Université de Lyon I) N° d’ordre : Année 2010 THESE Présentée devant l’UNIVERSITE CLAUDE BERNARD – LYON 1 pour l’obtention du DIPLOME DE DOCTORAT (arrêté du 7 août 2006) Présentée et soutenue publiquement le 25 Octobre 2010 Par M.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN BIRDS of CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, Trends and National Responsibilities
    EUROPEAN BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, trends and national responsibilities COMPILED BY ANNA STANEVA AND IAN BURFIELD WITH SPONSORSHIP FROM CONTENTS Introduction 4 86 ITALY References 9 89 KOSOVO ALBANIA 10 92 LATVIA ANDORRA 14 95 LIECHTENSTEIN ARMENIA 16 97 LITHUANIA AUSTRIA 19 100 LUXEMBOURG AZERBAIJAN 22 102 MACEDONIA BELARUS 26 105 MALTA BELGIUM 29 107 MOLDOVA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 32 110 MONTENEGRO BULGARIA 35 113 NETHERLANDS CROATIA 39 116 NORWAY CYPRUS 42 119 POLAND CZECH REPUBLIC 45 122 PORTUGAL DENMARK 48 125 ROMANIA ESTONIA 51 128 RUSSIA BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is a partnership of 48 national conservation organisations and a leader in bird conservation. Our unique local to global FAROE ISLANDS DENMARK 54 132 SERBIA approach enables us to deliver high impact and long term conservation for the beneit of nature and people. BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is one of FINLAND 56 135 SLOVAKIA the six regional secretariats that compose BirdLife International. Based in Brus- sels, it supports the European and Central Asian Partnership and is present FRANCE 60 138 SLOVENIA in 47 countries including all EU Member States. With more than 4,100 staf in Europe, two million members and tens of thousands of skilled volunteers, GEORGIA 64 141 SPAIN BirdLife Europe and Central Asia, together with its national partners, owns or manages more than 6,000 nature sites totaling 320,000 hectares. GERMANY 67 145 SWEDEN GIBRALTAR UNITED KINGDOM 71 148 SWITZERLAND GREECE 72 151 TURKEY GREENLAND DENMARK 76 155 UKRAINE HUNGARY 78 159 UNITED KINGDOM ICELAND 81 162 European population sizes and trends STICHTING BIRDLIFE EUROPE GRATEFULLY ACKNOWLEDGES FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
    [Show full text]
  • Punctuated Equilibrium Vs. Phyletic Gradualism
    International Journal of Bio-Science and Bio-Technology Vol. 3, No. 4, December, 2011 Punctuated Equilibrium vs. Phyletic Gradualism Monalie C. Saylo1, Cheryl C. Escoton1 and Micah M. Saylo2 1 University of Antique, Sibalom, Antique, Philippines 2 DepEd Sibalom North District, Sibalom, Antique, Philippines [email protected] Abstract Both phyletic gradualism and punctuated equilibrium are speciation theory and are valid models for understanding macroevolution. Both theories describe the rates of speciation. For Gradualism, changes in species is slow and gradual, occurring in small periodic changes in the gene pool, whereas for Punctuated Equilibrium, evolution occurs in spurts of relatively rapid change with long periods of non-change. The gradualism model depicts evolution as a slow steady process in which organisms change and develop slowly over time. In contrast, the punctuated equilibrium model depicts evolution as long periods of no evolutionary change followed by rapid periods of change. Both are models for describing successive evolutionary changes due to the mechanisms of evolution in a time frame. Keywords: macroevolution, phyletic gradualism, punctuated equilibrium, speciation, evolutionary change 1. Introduction Has the evolution of life proceeded as a gradual stepwise process, or through relatively long periods of stasis punctuated by short periods of rapid evolution? To date, what is clear is that both evolutionary patterns – phyletic gradualism and punctuated equilibrium have played at least some role in the evolution of life. Gradualism and punctuated equilibrium are two ways in which the evolution of a species can occur. A species can evolve by only one of these, or by both. Scientists think that species with a shorter evolution evolved mostly by punctuated equilibrium, and those with a longer evolution evolved mostly by gradualism.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainer Ulrich 2002.Pdf
    New Developments in Viral Vaccine Technologies Guest Editors Rainer Ulrich, Berlin George P. Lomonossoff, Norwich Detlev H. Krüger, Berlin 73 figures and 39 tables, 2002 Basel Ⴇ Freiburg Ⴇ Paris Ⴇ London Ⴇ New York Ⴇ Bangalore Ⴇ Bangkok Ⴇ Singapore Ⴇ Tokyo Ⴇ Sydney S. Karger Drug Dosage All rights reserved. Medical and Scientific Publishers The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to en- No part of this publication may be translated into other Basel Ⴇ Freiburg Ⴇ Paris Ⴇ London sure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, Ⴇ Ⴇ accord with current recommendations and practice at the time electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, New York Bangalore Bangkok of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval Ⴇ Ⴇ Singapore Tokyo Sydney in government regulations, and the constant flow of informa- system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in tion relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to urged to check the package insert for each drug for any change the Copyright Clearance Center (see ‘General Information’). in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precau- tions. This is particularly important when the recommended © Copyright 2002 by S. Karger AG, agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. P.O. Box, CH–4009 Basel (Switzerland) Printed in Switzerland on acid-free paper by Reinhardt Druck, Basel ISBN 3–8055–7505–X Fax + 41 61 306 12 34 E-Mail [email protected] www.karger.com Contents Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • New Information on the Late Pleistocene Birds from San Josecito Cave, Nuevo Leon, Mexico ’
    A JOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY Volume 96 Number 3 The Condor96571-589 Q The Cooper Omithologkzd %cietY 1994 NEW INFORMATION ON THE LATE PLEISTOCENE BIRDS FROM SAN JOSECITO CAVE, NUEVO LEON, MEXICO ’ DAVID W. STEADMAN New York State Museum, The State Education Department, Albany, NY 12230 JOAQUIN ARROYO-CARRALES Museum of Texas Tech University,Lubbock, TX 79409 and Laboratorio de Paleozoologia,Subdireccion de ServiciosAcademicos, Instituto National de Antropologiae Historia, Mexico EILEEN JOHNSON Museum of Texas Tech University,Lubbock, TX 79409 A. FARIOLA GUZMAN Laboratorio de Paleozoologta,Subdireccibn de ServiciosAcademicos, Instituto National de Antropologiiae Historia, Mexico Abstract. We report 90 bird bones representing 18 speciesfrom recent excavations at San Josecito Gave, Nuevo Le6n, Mexico. The new material increasesthe avifauna of this rich late Pleistocenelocality from 52 to 62 species.Eight of the 10 newly recorded taxa are extant; each is either of temperate rather than tropical affinities (such as the American Woodcock Scolopax minor and Pinyon Jay Gymnorhinuscyanocephalus) or is very wide- spreadin its modem distribution. The two extinct taxa are a stork (Ciconia sp. or Mycteria sp.) and Geococcyxcalifornianus conklingi, a large temporal subspeciesof the Greater Road- runner. In this region of the Sierra Madre Oriental (about lat. 24”N, long. lOO”W, elev. 2,000-2,600 m). the late Pleistocene avifauna was a mixture of speciesthat to&y prefer coniferous or pine-oak forests/woodlands,grasslands/savannas, and wetlands. As with var- ious late Pleistoceneplant and mammal communities of the United Statesand Mexico, no clear modem analog exists for the late Pleistoceneavifauna of San JosecitoCave. Key words: Late Pleistoceneavzfaunas; Mexico; historicalbiogeography; extinct species; temperate/tropicaltransition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Chronospecies in Ammonites
    Atti II Conv. Int. Pallini pp. 273-289 Chronospecies in Ammonites F.E.A. Pergola, 87 et alii cur. 3 taw., 6 figg. The concept of chronospecies in ammonites JERZY DZIK Zakfad Paleobiologii PAN, PL-02-089 Warszawa, Poland RIASSUNTO specific population in samples of the same geologic age (objective in principle), Le sole unita tassonomiche direttamente identificabili in paleonto- (5) reconstruction of evolutionary lineages by assembling logia sono i paleofena o gruppi di esemplari in un campione che pre- series of population from samples of different age, senta una distribuzione continua e unimodale della frequenza di tutti which are identified as being in close ancestor- i caratteri. Paleofena coevi possono essere sistemati in biospecie men- descendant relationships, tre serie temporali di questo formano delle linee filetiche. I risultati di entrambi i procedimenti sono empiricamente comprovabili. (6) delimitation of chronospecies within the lineage (sub- La ricostruzione delle linee e una condizione necessaria a priori per jective in principle), una definizione coscienziosa delle cronspecie, cioe segmenti arbitraria- (7) naming the chronospecies. mente designati di una linea. Un esempio empirico dimostra che pud Chronospecies is an evolutionary concept. Before any non essere possibile riconoscere i paleofena senza la biometria. chronospecies can be precisely defined, the evolution of Vengono discusse Ie prove per la presenza di due biospecie dimorfi- its lineage has to be determined. Even though the mean- che nel Calloviano di -Lukow (Polonia) e per la natura dimorfica dei ing of species in paleontology is so frequently vague, the generi valanginiani Saynoceras e Valanginites. gradualistic evolutionary nature of chronospecies is gener- ally assumed as self-evident.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the African Fish Louse Genus Dolops (Branchiura)
    Review of the African Fish Louse Genus Dolops (Branchiura) by Elindi Jansen van Rensburg Dissertation submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Magister Scientiae in the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of the Free State. Supervisor: Prof L.L. Van As Co-supervisor: Prof J.G. Van As Co-supervisor: Me K. Ehlers 2009 Table of contents Chapter 1: General Introduction 1 1.1 Species concepts and taxonomy 3 Comparison of the strategies of several crustacean fish parasites 14 1.3 The Cytochrome Oxidase I gene 18 Chapter 2: Review of the African Branchiura 22 2.1 Taxonomy of the Branchiura 24 2.2 Distribution of Branchiura 24 2.3 Branchiuran morphology 34 2.4 Branchiuran biology 41 2.5 Fish Representatives in the Geological Record of Africa 45 2.6 Evolution of Crustaceans specifically pertaining to the Branchiurans 50 2.7 Evolution of fish and attendant parasites in Africa 51 2.8 Branchiuran evolution 55 Chapter 3: Overview of African River Basins, with specific reference to the study locality(the Okavango Delta) and its biodiversity,particularly its fish fauna 60 3.1 Formation of the Okavango Basin 61 3.2 Present structure of the Okavango Delta 66 3.3 A short overview of the major river basins in Africa 68 3.4 The unique nature of the Okavango Delta 77 3.5 Factors affecting fish distriburion in Africa 78 3.6 Biodiversity of the Okavango Delta 80 3.7 Fish fauna of the Okavango Delta 81 Chapter 4: Morphological study :Materials and Methods 86 Chapter 5: Morphology – Results 91 Chapter 6: Comparison of Morphological and Molecular taxonomy 97 i 6.1 Molecular taxonomy 98 6.2 Taxonomic collections and databases 99 6.3 Problems encountered in taxonomy – species boundaries 101 6.4 Comparison of traditional taxonomy and molecular taxonomy 103 Chapter 7: Molecular Section Material and Methods 107 7.1 Collection and storage 107 7.2 Extraction 107 7.3 Ascertaining the presence of DNA 108 7.4 Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) 109 Chapter 8: Molecular Results 113 8.1 DNA extractions from Dolops.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Data Book of European Vertebrates : a Contribution to Action Theme N° 11 of the Pan-European Biological and Landscape Diversity Strategy, Final Draft
    Strasbourg, 5 July 2001 T-PVS (2001) 31 [Bern\T-PVS 2001\tpvs31e_2001] English only CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS Standing Committee Preliminary European Red List of Vertebrates Draft for comments - Volume 1 - Joint project between the Council of Europe and the European Environment Agency, based on WCMC draft from 1998. Co-ordinated by the European Topic Centre/Nature Conservation – Paris This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. T-PVS (2001) 31 - II - Comments should be sent to: European Topic Centre for Nature Protection and Biodiversity MNHN 57 rue Cuvier 75231 PARIS Cedex, France [email protected] - III - T-PVS (2001) 31 About this draft Red List This document is the result of a joint project between the European Environment Agency and the Council of Europe to develop a preliminary European Red List of Vertebrates. It is based on a first draft by WCMC in 1998. Except for Birds (Birdlife International, 1994), no assessment is yet available on the conservation status of Vertebrate species at European level, while Red Books exist at national level in almost all European countries. On the other hand, a global list of threatened species is published and maintained up-dated by IUCN according to well defined criteria (IUCN, 2000). The present assessment is a first attempt to identify the most threatened Vertebrates species at European level, building upon a first analysis of the list of globally threatened species present in Europe (WCMC, 1998) and taking into account the most recent available overviews on European species distribution provided by the various European atlas committees (European Bird Census Council; Societas Europaea Herpetologica, Societas Europea Mammalogica).
    [Show full text]
  • An Ephemeral Speciation Model Explains Patterns of Diversification
    Evol Biol DOI 10.1007/s11692-012-9171-x SYNTHESIS PAPER Goldilocks Meets Santa Rosalia: An Ephemeral Speciation Model Explains Patterns of Diversification Across Time Scales Erica Bree Rosenblum • Brice A. J. Sarver • Joseph W. Brown • Simone Des Roches • Kayla M. Hardwick • Tyler D. Hether • Jonathan M. Eastman • Matthew W. Pennell • Luke J. Harmon Received: 2 December 2011 / Accepted: 24 February 2012 Ó The Author(s) 2012. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Understanding the rate at which new species How often do new species form? Studies of plant and form is a key question in studying the evolution of life on animal speciation rates have focused on different species, earth. Here we review our current understanding of speci- over different time scales, using different methods (e.g., ation rates, focusing on studies based on the fossil record, Simpson 1944; Givnish 2000; Coyne and Orr 2004). Here phylogenies, and mathematical models. We find that spe- we review our current understanding of speciation rates, ciation rates estimated from these different studies can be focusing on reconciling what we know from studies of dramatically different: some studies find that new species speciation based on the fossil record, phylogenies, and form quickly and often, while others find that new species mathematical models. We find that speciation rates esti- form much less frequently. We suggest that instead of mated from these different studies can be contradictory, being contradictory, differences in speciation rates across with some rates clearly much faster than others. Given that different scales can be reconciled by a common model.
    [Show full text]