DOCSLIB.ORG

Review of Native Species That Are Candidates for Listing As Endangered Or

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review of Native Species That Are Candidates for Listing As Endangered Or Vol. 76 Wednesday, No. 207 October 26, 2011 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Native Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notice of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions; Proposed Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:54 Oct 25, 2011 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM 26OCP2 jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2 66370 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 26, 2011 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR period October 1, 2010, through Species-specific information and September 30, 2011. materials we receive will be available Fish and Wildlife Service We request additional status for public inspection by appointment, information that may be available for during normal business hours, at the 50 CFR Part 17 the 244 candidate species identified in appropriate Regional Office listed below this CNOR. [Docket No. FWS–R9–ES–2011–0061; MO– under Request for Information in 9221050083–B2] DATES: We will accept information on SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. General any of the species in this Candidate information we receive will be available Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Notice of Review at any time. at the Office of Communications and and Plants; Review of Native Species ADDRESSES: This notice is available on Candidate Conservation, Arlington, VA That Are Candidates for Listing as the Internet at http:// (see address under FOR FURTHER Endangered or Threatened; Annual www.regulations.gov and http:// INFORMATION CONTACT). Notice of Findings on Resubmitted www.fws.gov/endangered/what-e-do/ Candidate Notice of Review Petitions; Annual Description of cnor.html. Species assessment forms Progress on Listing Actions with information and references on a Background particular candidate species’ range, AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, The Endangered Species Act of 1973, status, habitat needs, and listing priority Interior. as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) assignment are available for review at (ESA), requires that we identify species ACTION: Notice of review. the appropriate Regional Office listed of wildlife and plants that are SUMMARY: In this Candidate Notice of below in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION or endangered or threatened, based on the Review (CNOR), we, the U.S. Fish and at the Office of Communications and best available scientific and commercial Wildlife Service (Service), present an Candidate Conservation, Arlington, VA information. As defined in section 3 of updated list of plant and animal species (see address under FOR FURTHER the ESA, an endangered species is any INFORMATION CONTACT), or on our Web species which is in danger of extinction native to the United States that we _ regard as candidates for or have site (http://ecos.fws.gov/tess public/ throughout all or a significant portion of proposed for addition to the Lists of pub/SpeciesReport.do?listingType= its range, and a threatened species is Endangered and Threatened Wildlife C&mapstatus=1). Please submit any any species which is likely to become and Plants under the Endangered new information, materials, comments, an endangered species within the Species Act of 1973, as amended. or questions of a general nature on this foreseeable future throughout all or a Identification of candidate species can notice to the Arlington, VA, address significant portion of its range. Through assist environmental planning efforts by listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION the Federal rulemaking process, we add providing advance notice of potential CONTACT. Please submit any new species that meet these definitions to listings, allowing landowners and information, materials, comments, or the List of Endangered and Threatened resource managers to alleviate threats questions pertaining to a particular Wildlife at 50 CFR 17.11 or the List of and thereby possibly remove the need to species to the address of the Endangered Endangered and Threatened Plants at 50 list species as endangered or threatened. Species Coordinator in the appropriate CFR 17.12. As part of this program, we Even if we subsequently list a candidate Regional Office listed in SUPPLEMENTARY maintain a list of species that we regard species, the early notice provided here INFORMATION. as candidates for listing. A candidate could result in more options for species FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The species is one for which we have on file management and recovery by prompting Endangered Species Coordinator(s) in sufficient information on biological candidate conservation measures to the appropriate Regional Office(s), or vulnerability and threats to support a alleviate threats to the species. Chief, Office of Communications and proposal to list as endangered or The CNOR summarizes the status and Candidate Conservation, U.S. Fish and threatened, but for which preparation threats that we evaluated in order to Wildlife Service, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, and publication of a proposal is determine that species qualify as Room 420, Arlington, VA 22203 precluded by higher priority listing candidates and to assign a listing (telephone 703–358–2171). Persons who actions. We may identify a species as a priority number (LPN) to each species or use a telecommunications device for the candidate for listing after we have to determine that species should be deaf (TDD) may call the Federal conducted an evaluation of its status on removed from candidate status. Information Relay Service (FIRS) at our own initiative, or after we have Additional material that we relied on is 800–877–8339. made a positive finding on a petition to available in the Species Assessment and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We list a species, in particular we have Listing Priority Assignment Forms request additional status information found that listing is warranted but (species assessment forms) for each that may be available for any of the precluded by other higher priority candidate species. candidate species identified in this listing action (see the Petition Findings Overall, this CNOR recognizes three CNOR. We will consider this section, below). new candidates, changes the LPN for information to monitor changes in the We maintain this list of candidates for seven candidates, and removes three status or LPN of candidate species and a variety of reasons: To notify the public species from candidate status. to manage candidates as we prepare that these species are facing threats to Combined with other decisions for listing documents and future revisions their survival; to provide advance individual species that were published to the notice of review. We also request knowledge of potential listings that separately from this CNOR in the past information on additional species to could affect decisions of environmental year, the current number of species that consider including as candidates as we planners and developers; to provide are candidates for listing is 244. prepare future updates of this notice. information that may stimulate and This document also includes our You may submit your information guide conservation efforts that will findings on resubmitted petitions and concerning this notice in general or for remove or reduce threats to these describes our progress in revising the any of the species included in this species and possibly make listing Lists of Endangered and Threatened notice by one of the methods listed in unnecessary; to request input from Wildlife and Plants (Lists) during the the ADDRESSES section. interested parties to help us identify VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:54 Oct 25, 2011 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM 26OCP2 jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 26, 2011 / Proposed Rules 66371 those candidate species that may not shorter timescale (once the threats are included in this notice as a candidate is require protection under the ESA or imminent) than for species with lower one for which we have sufficient additional species that may require the magnitude threats. Because we do not information to prepare a proposed rule ESA’s protections; and to request routinely quantify how likely or how to list it because it is in danger of necessary information for setting soon extinction would be expected to extinction or likely to become priorities for preparing listing proposals. occur absent listing, we must evaluate endangered within the foreseeable We strongly encourage collaborative factors that contribute to the likelihood future throughout all or a significant conservation efforts for candidate and time scale for extinction. We portion of its range. species, and offer technical and therefore consider information such as: For more information on the process financial assistance to facilitate such The number of populations or extent of and standards used in assigning LPNs, efforts. For additional information range of the species affected by the a copy of the 1983 guidance is available regarding such assistance, please threat(s) or both; the biological on our Web site at: http://www.fws.gov/ contact the appropriate Regional Office significance of the affected endangered/esa-library/pdf/48fr43098- listed under Request for Information or population(s), taking into consideration 43105.pdf. For more information on the visit our Web site, http://www.fws.gov/ the life-history characteristics of the LPN assigned to a particular species, the endangered/what-we-do/cca.html. species and its current abundance and species assessment for each candidate distribution; whether the threats affect contains the LPN chart and a rationale Previous Notices of Review the species in only a portion of its range, for the determination of the magnitude We have been publishing candidate and if so the likelihood of persistence of and immediacy of threat(s) and notices of review (CNOR) since 1975. the species in the unaffected portions; assignment of the LPN; that information The most recent CNOR (prior to this the severity of the effects and the is summarized in this CNOR.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Colorado Wildlife Action Plan: Proposed Rare Plant Addendum
    Colorado Wildlife Action Plan: Proposed Rare Plant Addendum By Colorado Natural Heritage Program For The Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Initiative June 2011 Colorado Wildlife Action Plan: Proposed Rare Plant Addendum Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Initiative Members David Anderson, Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) Rob Billerbeck, Colorado Natural Areas Program (CNAP) Leo P. Bruederle, University of Colorado Denver (UCD) Lynn Cleveland, Colorado Federation of Garden Clubs (CFGC) Carol Dawson, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Michelle DePrenger-Levin, Denver Botanic Gardens (DBG) Brian Elliott, Environmental Consulting Mo Ewing, Colorado Open Lands (COL) Tom Grant, Colorado State University (CSU) Jill Handwerk, Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) Tim Hogan, University of Colorado Herbarium (COLO) Steve Kettler, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Andrew Kratz, U.S. Forest Service (USFS) Sarada Krishnan, Colorado Native Plant Society (CoNPS), Denver Botanic Gardens Brian Kurzel, Colorado Natural Areas Program Eric Lane, Colorado Department of Agriculture (CDA) Paige Lewis, The Nature Conservancy (TNC) Ellen Mayo, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mitchell McGlaughlin, University of Northern Colorado (UNC) Jennifer Neale, Denver Botanic Gardens Betsy Neely, The Nature Conservancy Ann Oliver, The Nature Conservancy Steve Olson, U.S. Forest Service Susan Spackman Panjabi, Colorado Natural Heritage Program Jeff Peterson, Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Josh Pollock, Center for Native Ecosystems (CNE) Nicola Ripley,
    [Show full text]
  • Modelando La Distribución De Atlantea Tulita : Especie Endémica En Peligro
    ModelandoModelando lala distribucidistribuci óónn dede AtlanteaAtlantea tulitatulita :: especieespecie endend éémicamica enen peligropeligro dede extinciextinci óónn enen PuertoPuerto RicoRico Andr és V élez Estudiante de Maestr ía Universidad de Puerto Rico, Mayag üez Departamento de Biolog ía Franz Lab - Insect Systematics & Evolution http:// academic.uprm.edu /franz /ave.html IntroducciIntroducci óónn yy justificacijustificaci óónn • Perdida de diversidad Modificación paisaje • Endemismos Cambio climático (Thomas et al 2004) • Condición de Puerto Rico Pérdida de habitad • Conocimiento para CONSERVAR • Herramienta Modelación potencial distribución • Áreas protegidas conocer la actual o futura distribución EstatusEstatus A.A. tulitatulita -Lista 88 especies amenazadas DRNA (Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambientales de Puerto Rico) 2007 (Protección federal) -El DRNA (2009) 1°invertebrado lista de especies en peligro de extinción -Petición comunidad (2010) por destrucción de hábitat -Presencia restringida a el municipio Quebradillas y otra en el municipio de Maricao (Carrión, 2003) -Especie en amenaza? -Falta de investigaciones para concluir • Elaborar un modelo de predicción de distribución • Área idóneas en Puerto Rico • Trabajos de bilogía y ecología • Pautas para conservación ObjetivoObjetivo Realizar un modelo de predicción de la distribución potencial para la mariposa endémica A. tulita , actualmente en peligro de extinción en Puerto Rico ÁÁrearea dede estudioestudio PuertoPuerto RicoRico -Las-Área temperaturas aproximada dey lluvias 8990 km2 • El norte fresco y lluvioso -temperaturas Isla principal deentre Puerto 13-32°C Rico, •Mona, El sur semiáridoVieques y temperaturasCulebra. entre 13-38°C •-Diversidad El centro montañoso de ecosistemas: lluvioso y frío,0-1330m. promedio Bosques lluvias secos, 2540 mm temperaturasB. lluviosos, zona entre cársica, 4-32°C. áreas montañosas, -ecosistemas La cobertura costeros vegetal sey ha desarrolladomarinos.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest Draft Land and Resource Management Plan I Contents
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Coronado National Forest Southwestern Region Draft Land and Resource MB-R3-05-7 October 2013 Management Plan Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona, and Hidalgo County, New Mexico The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Front cover photos (clockwise from upper left): Meadow Valley in the Huachuca Ecosystem Management Area; saguaros in the Galiuro Mountains; deer herd; aspen on Mt. Lemmon; Riggs Lake; Dragoon Mountains; Santa Rita Mountains “sky island”; San Rafael grasslands; historic building in Cave Creek Canyon; golden columbine flowers; and camping at Rose Canyon Campground. Printed on recycled paper • October 2013 Draft Land and Resource Management Plan Coronado National Forest Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona Hidalgo County, New Mexico Responsible Official: Regional Forester Southwestern Region 333 Broadway Boulevard, SE Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 842-3292 For Information Contact: Forest Planner Coronado National Forest 300 West Congress, FB 42 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 388-8300 TTY 711 [email protected] Contents Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Landscape-Based Assessment of Climate Change Vulnerability for All Native Hawaiian Plants
    Technical Report HCSU-044 A LANDscape-bASED ASSESSMENT OF CLIMatE CHANGE VULNEraBILITY FOR ALL NatIVE HAWAIIAN PLANts Lucas Fortini1,2, Jonathan Price3, James Jacobi2, Adam Vorsino4, Jeff Burgett1,4, Kevin Brinck5, Fred Amidon4, Steve Miller4, Sam `Ohukani`ohi`a Gon III6, Gregory Koob7, and Eben Paxton2 1 Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative, Honolulu, HI 96813 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawaii National Park, HI 96718 3 Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Hawai‘i at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 4 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service —Ecological Services, Division of Climate Change and Strategic Habitat Management, Honolulu, HI 96850 5 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawai‘i National Park, HI 96718 6 The Nature Conservancy, Hawai‘i Chapter, Honolulu, HI 96817 7 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Hawaii/Pacific Islands Area State Office, Honolulu, HI 96850 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit University of Hawai‘i at Hilo 200 W. Kawili St. Hilo, HI 96720 (808) 933-0706 November 2013 This product was prepared under Cooperative Agreement CAG09AC00070 for the Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center of the U.S. Geological Survey. Technical Report HCSU-044 A LANDSCAPE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITY FOR ALL NATIVE HAWAIIAN PLANTS LUCAS FORTINI1,2, JONATHAN PRICE3, JAMES JACOBI2, ADAM VORSINO4, JEFF BURGETT1,4, KEVIN BRINCK5, FRED AMIDON4, STEVE MILLER4, SAM ʽOHUKANIʽOHIʽA GON III 6, GREGORY KOOB7, AND EBEN PAXTON2 1 Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative, Honolulu, HI 96813 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawaiʽi National Park, HI 96718 3 Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Hawaiʽi at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 4 U.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2017
    Ellipsaria Vol. 19 - No. 4 December 2017 Newsletter of the Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society Volume 19 – Number 4 December 2017 Cover Story . 1 Society News . 4 Announcements . 7 Regional Meetings . 8 March 12 – 15, 2018 Upcoming Radisson Hotel and Conference Center, La Crosse, Wisconsin Meetings . 9 How do you know if your mussels are healthy? Do your sickly snails have flukes or some other problem? Contributed Why did the mussels die in your local stream? The 2018 FMCS Workshop will focus on freshwater mollusk Articles . 10 health assessment, characterization of disease risk, and strategies for responding to mollusk die-off events. FMCS Officers . 19 It will present a basic understanding of aquatic disease organisms, health assessment and disease diagnostic tools, and pathways of disease transmission. Nearly 20 Committee Chairs individuals will be presenting talks and/or facilitating small group sessions during this Workshop. This and Co-chairs . 20 Workshop team includes freshwater malacologists and experts in animal health and disease from: the School Parting Shot . 21 of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota; School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin; School 1 Ellipsaria Vol. 19 - No. 4 December 2017 of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences, Auburn University; the US Geological Survey Wildlife Disease Center; and the US Fish and Wildlife Service Fish Health Center. The opening session of this three-day Workshop will include a review of freshwater mollusk declines, the current state of knowledge on freshwater mollusk health and disease, and a crash course in disease organisms. The afternoon session that day will include small panel presentations on health assessment tools, mollusk die-offs and kills, and risk characterization of disease organisms to freshwater mollusks.
    [Show full text]
  • Digitalcommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 1996 Bromegrasses Kenneth P. Vogel University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] K. J. Moore Iowa State University Lowell E. Moser University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub Vogel, Kenneth P.; Moore, K. J.; and Moser, Lowell E., "Bromegrasses" (1996). Publications from USDA- ARS / UNL Faculty. 2097. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/2097 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published 1996 17 Bromegrasses1 K.P. VOGEL USDA-ARS Lincoln, Nebraska K.J.MOORE Iowa State University Ames, Iowa LOWELL E. MOSER University of Nebraska Lincoln, Nebraska The bromegrasses belong to the genus Bromus of which there are some 100 spe­ cies (Gould & Shaw, 1983). The genus includes both annual and perennial cool­ season species adapted to temperate climates. Hitchcock (1971) described 42 bro­ megrass species found in the USA and Canada of which 22 were native (Gould & Shaw, 1983). Bromus is the Greek word for oat and refers to the panicle inflo­ rescence characteristic of the genus. The bromegrasses are C3 species (Krenzer et aI., 1975; Waller & Lewis, 1979). Of all the bromegrass species, only two are cultivated for permanent pas­ tures to any extent in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTAMENTO DE ESTADO Núm. Reglamento: 6766 Secr .O De
    ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO DEPARTAMENTO DE RECURSOS NATURALES Y AMBIENTALES DEPARTAMENTO DE ESTADO Núm. Reglamento: 6766 Fecha Radicación: 11de febrero de 2004 Aprobado : José Miguel Izquierdo Encarnación Secr .o de Estado C) Por: (1 ft p SOCIADO of Gis ' -. IF'arcía R~ A(~ Secretaria liar de Servicios F,Q 0~ TO C) 01 yy' O t7 N m w lo 01W C A DRNA C 4ctfRsOS NPT REGLAMENTO PARA REGIR LAS ESPECIES VULNERABLES Y EN PELIGRO DE EXTINCIÓN EN EL ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO C') Cy REGLAMENTO PARA REGIR LAS ESPECIES VULNERABLES Y EN PELIGRO DE EXTINCIÓN EN EL ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO INDICE O INDICE 1 ARTÍCULO 1 DISPOSICIONES GENERALES 2 1 .01 TÍTULO 2 1 .02 BASE LEGAL 2 1 .03 PROPOSITOS 2 1 .04 APLICABILIDAD 2 1 .05 DISPOSICIONES ESPECIALES 2 C. 1 .06 APROBACION Y VIGENCIA DEL REGLAMENTO 3 1 .07 DEFINICIONES 3 1 .08 SIGLAS 8 1 .09 USO DE PALABRAS 8 1 .10 CLAUSULA DE SEPARABILIDAD 8 ARTÍCULO 2 DISPOSICIONES ESPECIALES 8 O) 2 .01 PROHIBICIONES GENERALES 8 2 .02 PROHIBICIONES ESPECFICAS 9 2.03 EXCEPCIONES A LAS PROHIBICIONES 9 2.04 PRUEBA DE EXCEPCIÓN 9 2.05 PROHIBICIONES RELATIVAS A FAUNA SILVESTRE VULNERABLE O EN PELIGRO DE EXTINCIÓN 10 O 2 .06 PROHIBICIONES RELATIVAS A PLANTAS VULNERABLES O EN PELIGRO DE EXTINCIÓN ... 11 2 .07 AVISO PÚBLICO 11 2 .08 PARTICIPACIÓN CIUDADANA 12 2 .09 CONSULTA INTERAGENCIAL 12 12 2 .10 ACUERDOS -. ARTICULO 3 IDENTIFICACIÓN, DESIGNACIÓN Y DETERMINACIÓN DE ESPECIES VULNERABLES O Y ESPECIES EN PELIGRO DE EXTINCION 12 3 .01 IDENTIFICACIÓN Y DESIGNACIÓN 12 3 .02 OTROS ASPECTOS 16 3 .03 SOLICITUD DE DESIGNACION 16 3 .04 DETERMINACIÓN 16 3 .05 LISTA DE ESPECIES : 17 3 .06 REVISIÓN DE LA LISTA 17 O ARTICULO 4 HÁBITAT NATURAL CRÍTICO Y HABITAT NATURAL CRÍTICO ESENCIAL 17 4.01 DESIGNACION 17 4.02 REQUISITOS DE DETERMINACIÓN 17 4.03 CRITERIOS PARA LA DESIGNACIÓN DE UN HÁBITAT NATURAL CRÍTICO ESENCIAL : 18 4.04 CRITERIOS PARA LA DESIGNACIÓN DE UN HÁBITAT NATURAL CRÍTICO.
    [Show full text]
  • Species-Edition-Melanesian-Geo.Pdf
    Nature Melanesian www.melanesiangeo.com Geo Tranquility 6 14 18 24 34 66 72 74 82 6 Herping the final frontier 42 Seahabitats and dugongs in the Lau Lagoon 10 Community-based response to protecting biodiversity in East 46 Herping the sunset islands Kwaio, Solomon Islands 50 Freshwater secrets Ocean 14 Leatherback turtle community monitoring 54 Freshwater hidden treasures 18 Monkey-faced bats and flying foxes 58 Choiseul Island: A biogeographic in the Western Solomon Islands stepping-stone for reptiles and amphibians of the Solomon Islands 22 The diversity and resilience of flying foxes to logging 64 Conservation Development 24 Feasibility studies for conserving 66 Chasing clouds Santa Cruz Ground-dove 72 Tetepare’s turtle rodeo and their 26 Network Building: Building a conservation effort network to meet local and national development aspirations in 74 Secrets of Tetepare Culture Western Province 76 Understanding plant & kastom 28 Local rangers undergo legal knowledge on Tetepare training 78 Grassroots approach to Marine 30 Propagation techniques for Tubi Management 34 Phantoms of the forest 82 Conservation in Solomon Islands: acts without actions 38 Choiseul Island: Protecting Mt Cover page The newly discovered Vangunu Maetambe to Kolombangara River Island endemic rat, Uromys vika. Image watershed credit: Velizar Simeonovski, Field Museum. wildernesssolomons.com WWW.MELANESIANGEO.COM | 3 Melanesian EDITORS NOTE Geo PRODUCTION TEAM Government Of Founder/Editor: Patrick Pikacha of the priority species listed in the Critical Ecosystem [email protected] Solomon Islands Hails Partnership Fund’s investment strategy for the East Assistant editor: Tamara Osborne Melanesian Islands. [email protected] Barana Community The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) Contributing editor: David Boseto [email protected] is designed to safeguard Earth’s most biologically rich Prepress layout: Patrick Pikacha Nature Park Initiative and threatened regions, known as biodiversity hotspots.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
    Monday, November 9, 2009 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Native Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notice of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions; Proposed Rule VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:08 Nov 06, 2009 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\09NOP3.SGM 09NOP3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS3 57804 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 215 / Monday, November 9, 2009 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR October 1, 2008, through September 30, for public inspection by appointment, 2009. during normal business hours, at the Fish and Wildlife Service We request additional status appropriate Regional Office listed below information that may be available for in under Request for Information in 50 CFR Part 17 the 249 candidate species identified in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. General [Docket No. FWS-R9-ES-2009-0075; MO- this CNOR. information we receive will be available 9221050083–B2] DATES: We will accept information on at the Branch of Candidate this Candidate Notice of Review at any Conservation, Arlington, VA (see Endangered and Threatened Wildlife time. address above). and Plants; Review of Native Species ADDRESSES: This notice is available on Candidate Notice of Review That Are Candidates for Listing as the Internet at http:// Endangered or Threatened; Annual www.regulations.gov, and http:// Background Notice of Findings on Resubmitted endangered.fws.gov/candidates/ The Endangered Species Act of 1973, Petitions; Annual Description of index.html.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Biodiversity Survey of Papua New Guinea’S Manus and Mussau Islands
    A Rapid Biodiversity Survey of Papua New Guinea’s Manus and Mussau Islands edited by Nathan Whitmore Published by: Wildlife Conservation Society Papua New Guinea Program PO BOX 277, Goroka, Eastern Highlands Province PAPUA NEW GUINEA Tel: +675-532-3494 www.wcs.org Editor: Nathan Whitmore. Authors: Ken P. Aplin, Arison Arihafa, Kyle N. Armstrong, Richard Cuthbert, Chris J. Müller, Junior Novera, Stephen J. Richards, William Tamarua, Günther Theischinger, Fanie Venter, and Nathan Whitmore. The Wildlife Conservation Society is a private, not-for-profit organisation exempt from federal income tax under section 501c(3) of the Inland Revenue Code. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Wildlife Conservation Society, the Criticial Ecosystems Partnership Fund, nor the Papua New Guinean Department of Environment or Conservation. Suggested citation: Whitmore N. (editor) 2015. A rapid biodiversity survey of Papua New Guinea’s Manus and Mussau Islands. Wildlife Conservation Society Papua New Guinea Program. Goroka, PNG. ISBN: 978-0-9943203-1-5 Front cover Image: Fanie Venter: cliffs of Mussau. ©2015 Wildlife Conservation Society A rapid biodiversity survey of Papua New Guinea’s Manus and Mussau Islands. Edited by Nathan Whitmore Table of Contents Participants i Acknowledgements iii Organisational profiles iv Letter of support v Foreword vi Executive summary vii Introduction 1 Chapters 1: Plants of Mussau Island 4 2: Butterflies of Mussau Island (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera)
    [Show full text]