An Honorable Problem: a Case Study in the Pursuit of Honor in the Antebellum and Civil War South

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Honorable Problem: a Case Study in the Pursuit of Honor in the Antebellum and Civil War South Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2020 An honorable problem: A case study in the pursuit of honor in the antebellum and Civil War South Kelsey Joann Sissel Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Recommended Citation Sissel, Kelsey Joann, "An honorable problem: A case study in the pursuit of honor in the antebellum and Civil War South" (2020). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 18230. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/18230 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An honorable problem: A case study in the pursuit of honor in the antebellum and Civil War South by Kelsey Joann Sissel A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Major: History Program of Study Committee: Kathleen Hilliard, Major Professor Lawrence T. McDonnell Susan E. Cross The student author, whose presentation of the scholarship herein was approved by the program of study committee, is solely responsible for the content in this thesis. The Graduate College will ensure this thesis is globally accessible and will not permit alterations after a degree is conferred. Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2020 Copyright © Kelsey Joann Sissel, 2020. All rights reserved. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii ABSTRACT v INTRODUCTION: PART I 1 PART II 8 CONCLUSION: PART III 35 BIBLIOGRAPHY 38 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS All the hard work – both obvious and hidden – within this work would never have been possible without the consistent support of my family, friends, and academic mentors. As anyone who knows me could tell you, I am not one to gush about my feelings. So, in my usual fashion of glossing over the true depth of the gratitude I feel for the amazing people who have gotten me to this point, I will do my best to keep my language brief and punctured with humor (at least I think I am funny). My major professor Dr. Kathleen Hilliard and committee member Dr. Lawrence T. McDonnell have been cheering me on from the start. Larry did, after all, give me the idea that became this thesis. Without their constant support, reassurances, questions, and unflagging curiosity this work would be both far less interesting and, most likely, unfinished. Thank you both for everything you bring to the Department of History. It would be much less interesting without the two of you. You are both truly a credit to our profession. Dr. Susan E. Cross from the Department of Psychology deserves a special shout-out as well for her incredible interdisciplinary work in the field of honor (and willingness to be on my committee). Scholars like you will help to drive research in this field to new heights and enable an understanding that transcends disciplinary boundaries. I am excited to see where your research takes you next and how it might inform my own work in the future! Another special mention belongs to Dr. John Monroe, Dr. David Hollander, and Mr. Richard Kehrberg. As an undergrad, these three brilliant historians reignited my passion for history and rescued me from a life of chemical engineering. As a student in their classes, their love for history was undeniable and absolutely infectious. Their enthusiasm for understanding the past and engaging and passionate style of teaching inspired me to pursue history at the iv graduate level. Mr. Kehrberg, in particular, had the most direct influence on my staying at Iowa State past my bachelor’s degree. I will be forever in his debt. To my friends in the Grad Office (and those elsewhere), thank you so much for all your help and support. Being a part of a community like the one we had as TAs was the experience of a lifetime and I will never forget it. From movie nights and FACs to two partially finished Pathfinder campaigns, you were/are a huge part of why I love Iowa State. Sydney, Wansu, Sarah, Matt, Cole, Dylan, Colton, and even Nate, thanks for sharing in this crazy experience with me and here is to many more memories to come! Finally, I want to recognize those people who have been there for me since the very beginning (ca. 1994). I have been extremely lucky to have grown up with two amazing parents who have always encouraged me to follow my passions and turn them into something great. And while this work is a far-cry from the greatness I still hope to achieve in my lifetime, I do hope it does not reflect too poorly on their parenting nor on the unconditional love and support they have given me through the years. I love you both. But my absolute rock and foundation has been my sister, Mackenzie Schwartz. For three years she was endlessly and tirelessly supportive and encouraging. Her unflinching optimism and absolute belief in my abilities as a historian, a writer, and a scholar kept me afloat when I could not manage any of that for myself. She has been at my side since day one and, though I did not always know it, has had my back ever since. She is the kind of person I hope everyone has in their life. Love you, Mac-a-Doo! Very gratefully and humbly, Kelsey Joann Sissel v ABSTRACT This work uses the life of one man, Brigadier General Maxcy Gregg, to assess the life cycle of honor using newspapers, personal correspondence, pamphlets, and eulogies. Through early blunders with the public performance of honor, Gregg showcases honor’s relative flexibility as he grew into his role as an honorable southern gentleman as the South edged closer and closer to Civil War. As he came into his own, Gregg asserted his claim to honor through local political office, military service, and finally as a radical secessionist who helped lead South Carolina into armed rebellion against the union between the states. With his death at the Battle of Fredericksburg, Gregg cemented his legacy as an honorable man. 1 INTRODUCTION: PART I On December 15, 1862, Brigadier General Maxcy Gregg of the Army of Northern Virginia was shot off his horse. Douglas Southall Freeman wrote in his 1943 Lee’s Lieutenants that Gregg had been attempting to reign in his men as the Federals attacked a gap in the line at Fredericksburg. A curious moment in the history of the war, “in his deafness [Gregg] became confused and mistook the attacking Federals for retiring Confederates who might be shot down by his men.”1 As the Union advanced Orr’s Rifles (the regiment to Gregg’s right) turned and fled creating a gap between the rushing Federals and the retreating Confederates. It was into this gap that Gregg rode to order a cease fire where “Gregg, directly between his retreating soldiers and the pursuing Federals, was shot from his horse.”2 Having stopped the incursion into the gap the First South Carolina was reinforced by General Jubal Early’s brigades that had, up to this point, been held in reserve. As they pushed the Union back toward the Rappahannock, “Some of the advancing officers remembered […] they had seen a man pull himself painfully up by the side of a little tree, and wave them onward. It was Maxcy Gregg.”3 Accolades for the fallen general echoed across the Confederacy as comrades, friends, and family eulogized one of the South’s earliest and most radical secessionist stalwarts. During his lifetime, Gregg epitomized antebellum southern values and lived a life of honor. His eulogist, Benjamin Palmer, summed up Gregg’s life in this way: Inheriting a more than Roman virtue from his honored sire, it grew in him to such a robustness and symmetry as to command the homage of universal reverence. To say that he was incapable of falsehood, in any of the forms in which it is acted among men, would present but the coarse profile of his immaculate truthfulness. The historian must say of him more than this; that he could not stoop even to those minor indirections which creep unwittingly into human intercourse, and which are almost sanctioned by the usage of society. His simple word was the gauge of honor, and was always accepted as his surest pledge. His 1 Douglas Southall Freeman, Lee’s Lieutenants, vol. II (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1943), 355-356. 2 Freeman, Lee’s Lieutenants, 356. 3 Freeman, Lee’s Lieutenants, 357. 2 innate sense of right, which could not inflict a wilful [sic] wrong, looked with a cultivated resentment upon the wrong perpetrated by another; and as the aribiter [sic] of many a dispute, the honor of a friend was confided to a guardian whose jealousy would not suffer it to be tarnished with a stain.4 Palmer’s tribute suggested a life of honesty, integrity, sincerity, and courage. Gregg’s death on the battlefield was a tragic, but fitting end to a life well lived. It was an honorable death for what the elite, white south deemed an honorable man. This thesis considers the life of Maxcy Gregg and the southern social system that declared him honorable in attempting to answer the question: What did the life of an honorable man in the antebellum south look like? Prior to its disappearance sometime during the Civil War, a socially recognized code of honor carried immense weight in the American South.5 It served as the South’s unofficial social, cultural, and political policing system designed to maintain and enforce certain standards on and among certain classes of men.
Recommended publications
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1961, Volume 56, Issue No. 2
    MARYLAND HISTORICAL MAGAZINE VOL. 56, No. 2 JUNE, 1961 CONTENTS PAGE Sir Edmund Plowden's Advice to Cecilius Calvert Edited by Edward C. Carter, II 117 The James J. Archer Letters. Part I Edited by C. ^. Porter Hopkins 125 A British Officers' Revolutionary War Journal, 1776-1778 Edited by S. Sydney Bradford 150 Religious Influences on the Manumission of Slaves Kenneth L. Carroll 176 Sidelights 198 A Virginian and His Baltimore Diary: Part IV Edited by Douglas H. Gordon Reviews of Recent Books 204 Walsh, Charleston's Sons of Liberty: A Study of the Artisans, 1763- 1789, by Richard B. Morris Manakee, Maryland in the Civil War, by Theodore M. Whitfield Hawkins, Pioneer: A History of the Johns Hopkins University, 1874- 1889, by George H. Callcott Tonkin, My Partner, the River: The White Pine Story on the Susquehanna, by Dorothy M. Brown Hale, Pelts and Palisades: The Story of Fur and the Rivalry for Pelts in Early America, by R. V. Truitt Beitzell, The Jesuit Missions of St. Mary's County, Maryland, by Rev. Thomas A. Whelan Rightmyer, Parishes of the Diocese of Maryland, by George B. Scriven Altick, The Scholar Adventurers, by Ellen Hart Smith Levin, The Szolds of Lombard Street: A Baltimore Family, 1859- 1909, by Wilbur H. Hunter, Jr. Hall, Edward Randolph and the American Colonies, 1676-1703, by Verne E. Chatelain Gipson, The British Isles and the American Colonies: The Southern Plantations, 1748-1754, by Paul R. Locher Bailyn, Education in the Forming of American Society, by S. Sydney Bradford Doane, Searching for Your Ancestors: The How and Why of Genealogy, by Gust Skordas Notes and Queries 224 Contributors 228 Annual Subscription to the Magazine, $4.00.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Universalist Churches—United States—History—18Th Century
    The Universalist Movement in America 1770–1880 Recent titles in religion in america series Harry S. Stout, General Editor Saints in Exile Our Lady of the Exile The Holiness-Pentecostal Experience in Diasporic Religion at a Cuban Catholic African American Religion and Culture Shrine in Miami Cheryl J. Sanders Thomas A. Tweed Democratic Religion Taking Heaven by Storm Freedom, Authority, and Church Discipline Methodism and the Rise of Popular in the Baptist South, 1785–1900 Christianity in America Gregory A. Willis John H. Wigger The Soul of Development Encounters with God Biblical Christianity and Economic An Approach to the Theology of Transformation in Guatemala Jonathan Edwards Amy L. Sherman Michael J. McClymond The Viper on the Hearth Evangelicals and Science in Mormons, Myths, and the Historical Perspective Construction of Heresy Edited by David N. Livingstone, Terryl L. Givens D. G. Hart, and Mark A. Noll Sacred Companies Methodism and the Southern Mind, Organizational Aspects of Religion and 1770–1810 Religious Aspects of Organizations Cynthia Lynn Lyerly Edited by N. J. Demerath III, Princeton in the Nation’s Service Peter Dobkin Hall, Terry Schmitt, Religious Ideals and Educational Practice, and Rhys H. Williams 1868–1928 Mary Lyon and the Mount Holyoke P. C. Kemeny Missionaries Church People in the Struggle Amanda Porterfield The National Council of Churches and the Being There Black Freedom Movement, 1950–1970 Culture and Formation in Two James F. Findlay, Jr. Theological Schools Tenacious of Their Liberties Jackson W. Carroll, Barbara G. Wheeler, The Congregationalists in Daniel O. Aleshire, and Colonial Massachusetts Penny Long Marler James F.
    [Show full text]
  • General AP Hill at Gettysburg
    Papers of the 2017 Gettysburg National Park Seminar General A.P. Hill at Gettysburg: A Study of Character and Command Matt Atkinson If not A. P. Hill, then who? May 2, 1863, Orange Plank Road, Chancellorsville, Virginia – In the darkness of the Wilderness, victory or defeat hung in the balance. The redoubtable man himself, Stonewall Jackson, had ridden out in front of his most advanced infantry line to reconnoiter the Federal position and was now returning with his staff. Nervous North Carolinians started to fire at the noises of the approaching horses. Voices cry out from the darkness, “Cease firing, you are firing into your own men!” “Who gave that order?” a muffled voice in the distance is heard to say. “It’s a lie! Pour it into them, boys!” Like chain lightning, a sudden volley of musketry flashes through the woods and the aftermath reveals Jackson struck by three bullets.1 Caught in the tempest also is one of Jackson’s division commanders, A. P. Hill. The two men had feuded for months but all that was forgotten as Hill rode to see about his commander’s welfare. “I have been trying to make the men cease firing,” said Hill as he dismounted. “Is the wound painful?” “Very painful, my arm is broken,” replied Jackson. Hill delicately removed Jackson’s gauntlets and then unhooked his sabre and sword belt. Hill then sat down on the ground and cradled Jackson’s head in his lap as he and an aide cut through the commander’s clothing to examine the wounds.
    [Show full text]
  • “Never Have I Seen Such a Charge”
    The Army of Northern Virginia in the Gettysburg Campaign “Never Have I Seen Such a Charge” Pender’s Light Division at Gettysburg, July 1 D. Scott Hartwig It was July 1 at Gettysburg and the battle west of town had been raging furiously since 1:30 p.m. By dint of only the hardest fighting troops of Major General Henry Heth’s and Major General Robert E. Rodes’s divisions had driven elements of the Union 1st Corps from their positions along McPherson’s Ridge, back to Seminary Ridge. Here, the bloodied Union regiments and batteries hastily organized a defense to meet the storm they all knew would soon break upon them. This was the last possible line of defense beyond the town and the high ground south of it. It had to be held as long as possible. To break this last line of Union resistance, Confederate Third Corps commander, Lieutenant General Ambrose P. Hill, committed his last reserve, the division of Major General Dorsey Pender. They were the famed Light Division of the Army of Northern Virginia, boasting a battle record from the Seven Days battles to Chancellorsville unsurpassed by any other division in the army. Arguably, it may have been the best division in Lee’s army. Certainly no organization of the army could claim more combat experience. Now, Hill would call upon his old division once more to make a desperate assault to secure victory. In many ways their charge upon Seminary Ridge would be symbolic of why the Army of Northern Virginia had enjoyed an unbroken string of victories through 1862 and 1863, and why they would meet defeat at Gettysburg.
    [Show full text]
  • 3356770.Pdf (3.910Mb)
    Copyright © 2008 Aaron Menikoff All rights reserved. The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary has permission to reproduce and disseminate this document in any form by any means for purposes chosen by the Seminary, including, without limitation, preservation or instruction. PIETY AND POLITICS: BAPTIST SOCIAL REFORM IN AMERICA, 1770-1860 A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Aaron Menikoff October 2008 UMI Number: 3356770 Copyright 2009 by Menikoff, Aaron All rights reserved INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UM^ . I<§> UMI Microform 3356770 Copyright2009by ProQuest LLC All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 APPROVAL SHEET PIETY AND POLITICS: BAPTIST SOCIAL REFORM IN AMERICA, 1770-1860 Aaron Menikoff Read and Approved by: Gregory A. Wills (Supervisor) omas J./Wettle, \JJJt>S> Russell D. Moore Date a a/cy* To Deana, my wife and friend TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PREFACE vi Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION 1 An Evangelical Impulse 4 A Search for Virtue 11 Real Social Reform 13 Thesis and Summary 19 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Stablished in 1798 on the Edge of Town As Columbia's First Public
    Memorializing the deeds, trials, tribulations and federal architect; the Washington Monument and the with a number of other Federalists, permitted the election US Treasury Building are his creations. Mills became of Thomas Jefferson. BULL STREET Christian faith of individuals buried here, the churchyard and church records reveal the early an elder of this church in 1824. 9. HENRY WILLIAM DESAUSSURE (1763-1839) 29 N 26 27 history of our city, state and nation. Early graves 4. GEN. ADLEY H. GLADDEN FAMILY As a Revolutionary soldier, defended Charleston reflect Columbia as anew immigrant city with Monument to the wife and daughter of Gen. A. H. against the siege of Sir Henry Clinton. Read law under the 28 25 settlers from England, Scotland, Ireland, Connecticut, Gladden, who himself was killed at the Battle of Shiloh noted Philadelphia lawyer Jared Ingesoll, in which city he Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Virginia and in 1862 and is buried elsewhere; in the Mexican War, was first admitted to the Bar. Returned to South Carolina places within South Carolina. Many early residents following the death of senior officers, he commanded and became a member of the convention that framed the buried here were active in national political matters the Palmetto Regiment as major at Churubusco, South Carolina Constitution in 1789. Was President of and dealt with Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Chapaultepec and Mexico City; served as intendant the South Carolina Senate when it first met in Columbia Hamilton, Polk, Jackson, Webster and Calhoun. (mayor) of Columbia, 1851-1852. The bronze Palmetto in 1791; appointed Superintendent of the Mint in tree at the State House memorializes him and those Philadelphia by President Washington; a member of Tombstones record military service in the who died with him in Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • The Proceedings 2007
    THE PROCEEDINGS of The South Carolina Historical Association 2007 Robert Figueira and Stephen Lowe Co-Editors The South Carolina Historical Association South Carolina Department of Archives and History Columbia, South Carolina www.palmettohistory.org/scha/scha.htm ii Officers of the Association President: Bernard Powers, College of Charleston Vice President: Joyce Wood, Anderson University Secretary: Ron Cox, University of South Carolina, Lancaster Treasurer: Rodger Stroup, South Carolina Department of Archives and History Executive and Editorial Board Members Andrew Myers, University of South Carolina, Upstate (7) E.E. “Wink” Prince, Jr., Coastal Carolina University (8) Tracy Power, South Carolina Department of Archives and History (9) Stephen Lowe, University of South Carolina Extended Graduate Campus, co-editor Robert C. Figueira, Lander University, co-editor The Proceedings of the South Carolina Historical Association 7 iii Officers of the Association Membership Application The SOUTH CAROLINA HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION is an organization that furthers the teaching and understanding of history. The only requirement for membership is an interest in and a love for history. At the annual meeting papers on European, Asian, U.S., Southern, and South Carolina history are routinely presented. Papers presented at the annual meeting may be published in The Proceedings, a refereed journal. Membership benefits include: a subscription toThe Proceedings of the South Carolina Historical Association, notification of the annual meeting, the right to submit a pro- posal for a paper for presentation at the annual meeting, the quarterly SCHA News- letter, and the annual membership roster of the Association. SCHA membership is from 1 January to 31 December. Student members must cur- rently be enrolled in school.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Duelling in the United States
    The Woman's College of The University of North Carolina LIBRARY COLLEGE COLLECTION CQ no. 652 Gift of MARTIN LUTHER WILSON " WILSON, MARTIN LUTHER. A Survey of Duelling in the United States. (1969). Directed by: Dr» Richard Bardolph. pp. t2» This thesis was undertaken to study duelling as an aspect of social history in the United States. The aim of the researciier was to go beyond mere cnronicling of particu- lar duels, in an effort to ascertain feelings and attitudes toward the practice. To obtain such information, both pub- lished and unpublished sources were consulted, to reconstruct the story of duelling as it developed in America. The duel grew out of European practices, particularly the chivalry associated with knighthood. The custom was later transported to America by European settlers, though few duels occurred before the American Revolution. The presence of aristocratic European officers in America during that con- flict influenced natives, who retained the duelling custom. The duel was present in all sections of the new nation until Aaron Burr killed Alexander Hamilton in 160^-. At that point the duel lost favor in the Northern states, but held on pri- marily in the Southern states. Northern political leaders and military men continued to duel from time to time, however. For conducting the duelling ritual, there were various sets of written rules, the most widely used being those compiled by Governor John Lyde Wilson of South Carolina. These rules laid down the principles that duels should be only betv/een social equals, that all negotiations be con- ducted by seconds chosen for that purpose, and that the ( actual encounter be carried out fairly under rules agreed upon beforehand.
    [Show full text]
  • Militant South
    07095 THE MILITANT SOUTH 18OO-1861 John Hope Franklin (c) Cupynfiht. WA. hv the I'trudent and telltttM of Pint a% a (trtutm * pubthhftl PaprrikttH /^^ f h\ wrangtment with ftwufd friurmfv Itfaeon l^nt ^/mA.ii r^ fmhluhnl uri^rr ^ f &t th* l nitantm tfnwrr UI/MI 4 |i,u>< iatitm, Printed in tHf f'm'ffrf S/rt/^s f .i Third fMinting, tfrtrmhn MOZELLA. .AJNTlSrE, BTJC1C (jTr Preface When the Union fell apart in 1861, it was not possible for anyone to answer all the questions that arose in the troubled minds o Americans regarding that catastrophe. In searching for an explanation of the tragic dissolution, thoughtful ob- servers looked at the political and philosophical bases of the nation's structure. They found that the controversial ques- tion of the autonomy of the states and the concept of liberty that had evolved offered a partial answer to the question. They examined the economic order and realized that be- tween a commercial-industrial section and one that was pre- dominantly agricultural there was basis for conflict. They looked into the structure of society in the two sections and concluded that there were inherent conflicts between that committed to the view that universal freedom was the proper foundation for improving the social order and the other that insisted that its half-free, half-slave society needed only to be left alone. continued to Questions of how and why the war came have baffle the minds of men in the generations since 1861. A notable lack of agreement, except on the point of the almost accumulation of hopeless complexity, and the remarkable have been details regarding the course of events prior to 1861 the most impressive results.
    [Show full text]
  • Townsend, Ph.D
    THE BAPTIST HISTORY COLLECTION STATE HISTORIES SOUTH CAROLINA BAPTISTS 1670-1805 by Leah Townsend, Ph.D.. Thou hast given a standard to them that fear thee; that it may be displayed because of the truth — Psalm 60:4 The Baptist Standard Bearer, Inc. Version 1.0 © 2005 SOUTH CAROLINA BAPTISTS 1670-1805 BY LEAH TOWNSEND, PH.D. TO THE BAPTIST MINISTERS AND CHURCH CLERKS OF SOUTH CAROLINA whose cooperation has made this publication possible. Originally Published Florence, South Carolina 1935 CONTENTS FOREWORD 1. BAPTIST CHURCHES OF THE LOW-COUNTRY 2. BAPTIST CHURCHES OF THE PEEDEE SECTION 3. CHARLESTON ASSOCIATION OF BAPTIST CHURCHES 4. EARLY BAPTIST CHURCHES OF THE BACK COUNTRY 5. POST-REVOLUTIONARY REVIVAL 6. BACK COUNTRY ASSOCIATIONS 7. SIGNIFICANCE OF SOUTH CAROLINA BAPTISTS BIBLIOGRAPHY INDEX MAP Baptist Churches in South Carolina prior to 1805, with location and date of construction. Compiled by Leah Townsend, drawn by E. Lamar Holman. ABBREVIATIONS CB — Church Book CC — Clerk of Court JC — Journal of the Council JCHA — Journal of the Commons House of Assembly JHR — Journal of the House of Representatives JS — Journal of the Senate PC — Probate Court RMC — Register of Mesne Conveyance SCHGM — South Carolina Historical and Genealogical Magazine YBC — Year Book of the City of Charleston FOREWORD The manuscript of South Carolina Baptists 1670-1805 was submitted in 1926 to the Department of History of the University of South Carolina and accepted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy in American history. The undertaking grew out of the writer’s intense interest in religious history and the absence of any general account of the Baptists of this State; the effort throughout has been to treat Baptist history alone, and to give only enough political and religious background to present a clear view of the Baptists themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Historical Markers by Time Period
    South Carolina Historical Markers This list of historical markers is divided into the time periods as written in the South Carolina Social Studies Standards. Each time period lists the name of the historical marker, organized alphabetically by county. To read the full text of the historical marker, visit the South Carolina Historical Markers database at: http://www.scaet.org/markers/. South Carolina has over 1,400 historical markers, and new markers are added to this list twice a year. Colonial (Precontact-1763): Boonesborough Township (1763) (Abbeville) Broom Hall Plantation (Berkeley) Long Cane Cemetery (Abbeville) Crowfield Plantation (Berkeley) Savannah Town/Fort Moore (Aiken) Early Indian Trading Paths/The Goose Creek Silver Bluff Baptist Church (Aiken) Men (Berkeley) Beaufort (Beaufort) Goose Creek Bridge (Berkeley) Chapel of Ease (Beaufort) The Yamasee War at Goose Creek (1715) Ruins of Old Sheldon/Prince William’s Parish (Berkeley) Church (Beaufort) Berkeley County (Berkeley) Hilton Head (Beaufort) Medway (Berkeley) Pinckney Island (Beaufort) French Huguenot Plantation (Berkeley) St. Helena’s Church (Beaufort) First Land Granted in Calhoun County Area Old Monck’s Corner (Berkeley) (Calhoun) Mulberry Plantation (Berkeley) St. Matthew’s Lutheran Church/Parent Goose Creek Church (Berkeley) Lutheran Church of this Area (Calhoun) Biggin Church (Berkeley) Savany Hunt (Calhoun) Pompion Hill Chapel (Berkeley) Old Wappetaw Church (Charleston) St. Thomas Church (Berkeley) St. Paul’s, Stono/St. Paul’s Churchyard (Charleston) Old Jamestown
    [Show full text]
  • The Caning of Charles Sumner: Slavery, Race, and Ideology in the Age of the Civil War" (2003)
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Afro-American Studies Faculty Publication Series Afro-American Studies 2003 The ac ning of Charles Sumner: Slavery, race, and ideology in the age of the Civil War M Sinha [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/afroam_faculty_pubs Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Sinha, M, "The caning of Charles Sumner: Slavery, race, and ideology in the age of the Civil War" (2003). Journal of the Early Republic. 21. 10.2307/3125037 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Afro-American Studies at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Afro-American Studies Faculty Publication Series by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CANING OF CHARLES SUMNER: SLAVERY, RACE, AND IDEOLOGY IN THE AGE OF THE CIVIL WAR Manisha Sinha On May 22, 1856, Preston Smith Brooks, a South Carolinian congressman, assaulted a seated Charles Sumner, antislavery senator from Massachusetts, in the Senate chamber. Brooks rained blows on Sumner's head and shoulders with his cane while Representative Laurence M. Keitt, a secessionist colleague from South Carolina, kept others at bay. Brooks later described the caning in a letter to his brother, "I struck him with my cane and gave him about 30 first rate stripes with a gutta perch cane.... Every lick went where I intended. For about the first five of six licks he offered to make fight but I plied him so rapidly that he did not touch me.
    [Show full text]