DOCSLIB.ORG

Places and Subjects

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Places and Subjects Places and Subjects Àbaton 33 Arcum Aurae 211, 212n, 215 Abbondanza 5–6, 82, 291n, 362–66, 370, 372, Column of Phocas 214, 216n, figs. 40, 50 382. See also Annona Curia Senatus 45, 134, 186, 187, 214, 232, Altopascio. See People, Religious Orders, 282, 281, fig. 34 Hospital Order of Altopascio Regia 215 Amiens 8 Secretarium 186 Anagni 83, 155, 188, 262, 284, 286 Temple of Antoninus and Faustina or Ancient monuments S. Lorenzo in Miranda 204, 215, 216n, Aqua Traiana aqueduct 44 217n, 221 Arch of Basile 294, 297, 299, 315, 330, 336 Temple of Caesar 215–16 Arch of Constantine 217, 220, 241, 324, Temple of Janus 214 fig. 60 Temple of Jove Stator 217 Arch of Janus Quadrifons 218, 220n, Angevin Empire 9, 60–61, 64, 66 232n, fig. 62 Anjou 59, 60, 61, 64–65 Arch of Silano and Dolabella 241, 245, Annona 30, 39–40, 364. See also 316, fig. 48 Abbondanza Basilica of Junius Bassus 144n, 186–87, Anointment 271 of clergy 68, 85 Baths of Caracalla 185–86, 240, 282n of European kings 44, 54, 59, 71–72, Claudian aqueduct and arches 176, 211, 74–75 241, 294, 297, 298, 299, 307, 315–16, 321, of Hebrew kings 52 329, 330, 338, figs. 47, 99, 102 of popes 94 Cloaca Maxima 150 of queens 75 Colosseum. See also People, Roman Antioch 34, 119 families, Frangipane 83, 96, 134, 139, Arab medicine and translations 15–16, 181n, 140, 175, 211, 218, 220–22, 224n, 231–33, 184 235, 239, 240, 241, 245, 255, 257, 259–60, Assisi, frescoes of basilica 224, 228, 267, 270n, 273, 275, 282, 289, 313, 321, 323, 279n, 357, 358n, fig. 64 324–27, 336, figs. 56, 80 Auricular confession 86–88 Mausoleum of Augustus 263, 267, 283, Avignon 47, 111n, 128, 193, 202, 287, 288, 286, 376 309–10, 327n, 341, 342, 352, 364 Mausoleum of Cecilia Metella 285 Mausoleum of Helena, Constantine’s Béziers 10 mother 294–95 Black Death. See Plague Pompey’s Theater 377 Borgo, fig. 18 Septizonium 220–21, 241 as center of papal power 18, 19, 20, 80, Temple of Hercules Victor in the Forum 96, 98–100, 123–29, 139, 197, 213, 289, Boarium 371 339, 342, 350, 361–62, 377, 382 Theater of Pompey 377 competing locations for papal seat Ancient monuments in the Forums 96–99 Arch of Augustus 216 defenses 81 Arch of Fabianus 215, 216n Bricks, spoliated 105, 143–44, 168, 201, Arch of Septimius Severus 44–45, 214, 306–07, 353 231, figs. 44, 50 Bridges Arch of Titus 116, 118, 213, 217, 232, fig. 50 Milvian 366 Places And Subjects 439 Pons Neronianus or Triumphalis 368–70 S. Adriano. See Ancient monuments in the Ponte Cestio 370 Forums, Curia Senatus Ponte Fabricius or Quattro Capi 370 S. Anastasia. See People, Roman families, Ponte S. Maria or Ponte Rotto 370, Frangipane 371–72, 373 S. Annunziata. See S. Basilio Ponte Sant’Angelo 82, 90, 98, 128, 171, 212, S. Andrea. See People, Raccomandati del 347, 252, 354, 361, 366, 368–70, 372, 375, SS. Salvatore, S. Andrea 376, 380 Sant’Angelo in Pescheria 175n, 372 Ponte Sisto 338, 342, 366–73, 375, 377, S. Antonio Abbate 144, 187, fig. 33 378–79, 383, 385, 386, figs. 111, 113–14 S. Basilio. See People, Religious Orders, Bronze she-wolf 42, 332, 382 Military Orders, Knights of St John of Burgus Saxonum. See Scholae, Saxons Jerusalem S. Caterina a Magnanapoli 226–27, Campagna Romana 103, 160, 208, 209, 210, figs. 63, 65 238, 249, 263, 269, fig. 35 S. Clemente 211, 273, 279 Campo de’ Fiori 364, 366, 368, 370, 372, S. Cosimato 373 375–76, 377–83 S. Eustachio 44, 269, 272, 362, 366, 382 Campo Torrecchiano 204, 216n, figs. 56, 81 S. Francesca Romana in the Forum. See Campo Vaccino 204 S. Maria Nova in the Forum Campus Martius 127, 128, 206, 212, 265, S. Francesco di Paola 256, figs. 56, 81 266n S. Giacomo al Colosseo. See People, Castel San Pietro 267 Raccomandati del SS. Salvatore, Castel Sant’Angelo 44, 98, 127, 185, 217, 370 infirmaries and Roman families, Castle of Margat 147 Colonna, Pietro, founder of S. Giacomo Cathedra Petri 120–22, 124, 209, fig. 25 al Colosseo Charity S. Giorgio al Velabro 40, 97, 218, 232n, attribute of leadership 30, 39–49 319n, fig. 62 ancient Near East 26–29 S. Gregorio al Celio 221, 241, 245, fig. 72 bishops 31–39 S. Lorenzo in Damaso 375, 379 Greco-Roman civilization 30–31 S. Lorenzo in Miranda. See Ancient relationship to justice 27–28, 38, 44, Monuments in the Forum, Temple of 47, 49 Antoninus and Faustina religious injunction 14, 28–30 S. Lucia in Selci 45, 257, 258, 259 political significance and social effects 3, S. Maria ad Monasterio 254, 255 4, 33–34, 60–61 S. Maria ai Monti 83 visual representations 45–47 S. Maria Antiqua or S. Maria Liberatrice in Theodore Psalter 45, 46, fig. 7 the Forum 40, 216, 217n Passion of Edmund 46–48, fig. 8 S. Maria delle Grazie. See People, Churches Raccomandati del SS. Salvatore, All Saints, Writtle 83 cemetery Hagia Sophia, Constantinople 119 S. Maria del Popolo 380, fig. 111 S. Andrea, Vercelli 258 S. Maria del Sole. See S. Stefano delle S. Oliva, Cori 249–50, fig. 77 Carrozze Churches, chapels and monasteries in S. Maria in Aracoeli 277, 326 Rome 245–46 S. Maria in Pallara on the Palatine. See Old St Peter 282 People, Roman Families, Frangipane apse mosaic 124, fig. 26 S. Maria in Sassia. See Hospitals in Rome, as new cathedral 124–26 S. Spirito in Sassia.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ritual Cleaning-Up of the City: from the Lupercalia to the Argei*
    RITUAL CLEANING-UP OF THE CITY: FROM THE LUPERCALIA TO THE ARGEI* This paper is not an analysis of the fine aspects of ritual, myth and ety- mology. I do not intend to guess the exact meaning of Luperci and Argei, or why the former sacrificed a dog and the latter were bound hand and foot. What I want to examine is the role of the festivals of the Lupercalia and the Argei in the functioning of the Roman community. The best-informed among ancient writers were convinced that these were purification cere- monies. I assume that the ancients knew what they were talking about and propose, first, to establish the nature of the ritual cleanliness of the city, and second, see by what techniques the two festivals achieved that goal. What, in the perception of the Romans themselves, normally made their city unclean? What were the ordinary, repetitive sources of pollution in pre-Imperial Rome, before the concept of the cura Urbis was refined? The answer to this is provided by taboos and restrictions on certain sub- stances, and also certain activities, in the City. First, there is a rule from the Twelve Tables with Cicero’s curiously anachronistic comment: «hominem mortuum», inquit lex in duodecim, «in urbe ne sepelito neve urito», credo vel propter ignis periculum (De leg. II 58). Secondly, we have the edict of the praetor L. Sentius C.f., known from three inscrip- tions dating from the beginning of the first century BC1: L. Sentius C. f. pr(aetor) de sen(atus) sent(entia) loca terminanda coer(avit).
    [Show full text]
  • Rodolfo Lanciani, the Ruins and Excavations of Ancient Rome, 1897, P
    10/29/2010 1 Primus Adventus ad Romam Urbem Aeternam Your First Visit to Rome The Eternal City 2 Accessimus in Urbe AeternA! • Welcome, traveler! Avoiding the travails of the road, you arrived by ship at the port of Ostia; from there, you’ve had a short journey up the Via Ostiensis into Roma herself. What do you see there? 3 Quam pulchra est urbs aeterna! • What is there to see in Rome? • What are some monuments you have heard of? • How old are the buildings in Rome? • How long would it take you to see everything important? 4 Map of Roma 5 The Roman Forum • “According to the Roman legend, Romulus and Tatius, after the mediation of the Sabine women, met on the very spot where the battle had been fought, and made peace and an alliance. The spot, a low, damp, grassy field, exposed to the floods of the river Spinon, took the name of “Comitium” from the verb coire, to assemble. It is possible that, in consequence of the alliance, a road connecting the Sabine and the Roman settlements was made across these swamps; it became afterwards the Sacra Via…. 6 The Roman Forum • “…Tullus Hostilius, the third king, built a stone inclosure on the Comitium, for the meeting of the Senators, named from him Curia Hostilia; then came the state prison built by Ancus Marcius in one of the quarries (the Tullianum). The Tarquin [kings] drained the land, gave the Forum a regular (trapezoidal) shape, divided the space around its borders into building- lots, and sold them to private speculators for shops and houses, the fronts of which were to be lined with porticoes.” --Rodolfo Lanciani, The Ruins and Excavations of Ancient Rome, 1897, p.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/160995 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-10-04 and may be subject to change. Monuments & Memory Architectural Crossroads Studies in the History of Architecture Vol. 3 Series Editor Lex Bosman, Universiteit van Amsterdam Editorial Board Dale Kinney, Bryn Mawr College Wolfgang Schenkluhn, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle Christof Thoenes, Bibliotheca Hertziana, Rome Marvin Trachtenberg, New York University Monuments & Memory Christian Cult Buildings and Constructions of the Past Essays in honour of Sible de Blaauw Edited by Mariëtte Verhoeven, Lex Bosman, and Hanneke van Asperen H F Cover photo: Nine Miedema, S. Prassede in Rome. Image editing: Centre for Art Historical Documentation (CKD), Radboud University Nijmegen. © 2016, Brepols Publishers n.v., Turnhout, Belgium. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. D/2016/0095/215 ISBN 978-2-503-56973-4 Printed in the EU on acid-free paper Contents Introduction: Cherished Memories 9 Monuments ‘In Hoc Signo Vinces’: The Various Victories Commemorated Through the Labarum Nathalie DE HAAN & Olivier HEKSTER 17 Eine vergessene Erinnerung an das byzantinische Rom: Neudeutung und Rezeptionsgeschichte einer Grabinschrift aus dem 7. Jahrhundert in der S. Cecilia in Trastevere Raphael G. R. HUNSUCKER & Evelien J. J. ROELS 31 S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Janus Arch
    Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA2010 F. Contreras, M. Farjas and F.J. Melero (eds.) Digital Mediation from Discrete Model to Archaeological Model: the Janus Arch Ippolito, A.1, Borgogni, F.1, Pizzo, A.2 1 Dpto. RADAAr Università di Roma “Sapienza”, Italy 2 Instituto de Arqueologia (CSIC, Junta de Extremadura, Consorcio de Mérida), Spain [email protected]; [email protected] ; [email protected] Survey operations and the representation of acquired data should today be considered as consolidated. New acquisition methods such as point clouds obtained using 3D laser scanners are also part of today’s scenario. The scope of this paper is to propose a protocol of operations based on extensive previous experience and work to acquire and elaborate data obtained using complex 3D survey. This protocol focuses on illustrating the methods used to turn a numerical model into a system of two-dimensional and three-dimensional models that can help to understand the object in question. The study method is based on joint practical work by architects and archaeologists. The final objective is to create a layout that can satisfy the needs of scholars and researchers working in different disciplinary fields. The case study in this paper is the Arch of Janus in Rome near the Forum Boarium. The paper will illustrate the entire acquisition process and method used to transform the acquired data after the creation of a model. The entire operation was developed in close collaboration between the RADAAr Dept., University of Rome “Sapienza,” Italy and the Istituto de Arqueologia (CSIC, Junta de Extremadura, Consorcio de Mérida), Spain.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Architects, Antiquarians, and the Rise of the Image in Renaissance Guidebooks to Ancient Rome
    Anna Bortolozzi 3 Architects, Antiquarians, and the Rise of the Image in Renaissance Guidebooks to Ancient Rome Rome fut tout le monde, & tout le monde est Rome1 Drawing in the past, drawing in the present: Two attitudes towards the study of Roman antiquity In the early 1530s, the Sienese architect Baldassare Peruzzi drew a section along the principal axis of the Pantheon on a sheet now preserved in the municipal library in Ferrara (Fig. 3.1).2 In the sixteenth century, the Pantheon was generally considered the most notable example of ancient architecture in Rome, and the drawing is among the finest of Peruzzi’s surviving architectural drawings after the antique. The section is shown in orthogonal projection, complemented by detailed mea- surements in Florentine braccia, subdivided into minuti, and by a number of expla- natory notes on the construction elements and building materials. By choosing this particular drawing convention, Peruzzi avoided the use of foreshortening and per- spective, allowing measurements to be taken from the drawing. Though no scale is indicated, the representation of the building and its main elements are perfectly to scale. Peruzzi’s analytical representation of the Pantheon served as the model for several later authors – Serlio’s illustrations of the section of the portico (Fig. 3.2)3 and the roof girders (Fig. 3.3) in his Il Terzo Libro (1540) were very probably derived from the Ferrara drawing.4 In an article from 1966, Howard Burns analysed Peruzzi’s drawing in detail, and suggested that the architect and antiquarian Pirro Ligorio took the sheet to Ferrara in 1569.
    [Show full text]
  • Constantine Triumphal Arch 313 AD Basilica of St. Peter Ca. 324
    Constantine Triumphal Arch 313 AD Basilica of St. Peter ca. 324 ff. Old St. Peter’s: reconstruction of nave, plus shrine, transept and apse. Tetrarchs from Constantinople, now in Venice Constantine defeated the rival Augustus, Maxentius, at the Pons Mulvius or Milvian Bridge north of Rome, at a place called Saxa Rubra (“Red rocks”), after seeing a vision (“In hoc signo vinces”) before the battle that he eventually associated with the protection of the Christian God. Maxentius’s Special Forces (Equites Singulares) were defeated, many drowned; the corps was abolished and their barracks given to the Bishop of Rome for the Lateran basilica. To the Emperor Flavius Constantinus Maximus Father of the Fatherland the Senate and the Roman People Because with inspiration from the divine and the might of his intelligence Together with his army he took revenge by just arms on the tyrant And his following at one and the same time, Have dedicated this arch made proud by triumphs INSTINCTV DIVINITATIS TYRANNO Reconstruction of view of colossal Sol statue (Nero, Hadrian) seen through the Arch of Constantine (from E. Marlow in Art Bulletin) Lorsch, Germany: abbey gatehouse in the form of a triumphal arch, 9th c. St. Peter’s Basilicas: vaulted vs. columns with wooden roofs Central Hall of the Markets of Trajan Basilica of Maxentius, 3018-312, completed by Constantine after 313 Basilica of Maxentius: Vaulting in concrete Basilica of Maxentius, 3018-312, completed by Constantine after 313 Monolithic Corinthian column from the Basilica of Maxentius, removed in early 1600s by Pope Paul V and brought to the piazza in front of Santa Maria Maggiore Monolithic Corinthian column from the Basilica of Maxentius, removed in early 1600s by Pope Paul V and brought to the piazza in front of Santa Maria Maggiore BATHS OF DIOCLETIAN 298-306 AD Penn Station NY (McKim, Mead, and White) St.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Spolia and Urban Transformation in Rome from the Fourth to the Thirteenth Century
    Patrizio Pensabene Architectural Spolia and Urban Transformation in Rome from the Fourth to the Thirteenth Century Summary This paper is a historical outline of the practice of reuse in Rome between the th and th century AD. It comments on the relevance of the Arch of Constantine and the Basil- ica Lateranensis in creating a tradition of meanings and ways of the reuse. Moreover, the paper focuses on the government’s attitude towards the preservation of ancient edifices in the monumental center of Rome in the first half of the th century AD, although it has been established that the reuse of public edifices only became a normal practice starting in th century Rome. Between the th and th century the city was transformed into set- tlements connected to the principal groups of ruins. Then, with the Carolingian Age, the city achieved a new unity and several new, large-scale churches were created. These con- struction projects required systematic spoliation of existing marble. The city enlarged even more rapidly in the Romanesque period with the construction of a large basilica for which marble had to be sought in the periphery of the ancient city. At that time there existed a highly developed organization for spoliating and reworking ancient marble: the Cos- matesque Workshop. Keywords: Re-use; Rome; Arch of Constantine; Basilica Lateranensis; urban transforma- tion. Dieser Artikel bietet eine Übersicht über den Einsatz von Spolien in Rom zwischen dem . und dem . Jahrhundert n. Chr. Er zeigt auf, wie mit dem Konstantinsbogen und der Ba- silica Lateranensis eine Tradition von Bedeutungsbezügen und Strategien der Spolienver- wendung begründet wurde.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cambridge Companion to Age of Constantine.Pdf
    The Cambridge Companion to THE AGE OF CONSTANTINE S The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine offers students a com- prehensive one-volume introduction to this pivotal emperor and his times. Richly illustrated and designed as a readable survey accessible to all audiences, it also achieves a level of scholarly sophistication and a freshness of interpretation that will be welcomed by the experts. The volume is divided into five sections that examine political history, reli- gion, social and economic history, art, and foreign relations during the reign of Constantine, a ruler who gains in importance because he steered the Roman Empire on a course parallel with his own personal develop- ment. Each chapter examines the intimate interplay between emperor and empire and between a powerful personality and his world. Collec- tively, the chapters show how both were mutually affected in ways that shaped the world of late antiquity and even affect our own world today. Noel Lenski is Associate Professor of Classics at the University of Colorado, Boulder. A specialist in the history of late antiquity, he is the author of numerous articles on military, political, cultural, and social history and the monograph Failure of Empire: Valens and the Roman State in the Fourth Century ad. Cambridge Collections Online © Cambridge University Press, 2007 Cambridge Collections Online © Cambridge University Press, 2007 The Cambridge Companion to THE AGE OF CONSTANTINE S Edited by Noel Lenski University of Colorado Cambridge Collections Online © Cambridge University Press, 2007 cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao˜ Paulo Cambridge University Press 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011-4211, usa www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521818384 c Cambridge University Press 2006 This publication is in copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Masonry Constructions As Built Archives: an Innovative Analytical Approach to Reconstructing the Evolution of Imperial Opus Testaceum Brickwork in Rome
    Masonry Constructions as Built Archives: An Innovative Analytical Approach to Reconstructing the Evolution of Imperial Opus Testaceum Brickwork in Rome Gerold Eßer Vienna University of Technology, Austria The Colosseum, Trajan’s Market, the Baths of buil dings are to be regarded as the outcome of Caracalla and the Basilica of Maxentius: the monu- rational decisions made on the basis of economy, mental ruins of the imperial representational build- durability and functionality. Particularly in the ings mark the crystallisation points in a profound, area of important imperial public buildings, where centuries- long recasting of the appearance of the the pressure to be successful was exceptionally city of Rome (Fig. 1). The cores consist of practi- high, the conditions imposed by the market were cally indestructible opus caementitium, faced with certainly strictly observed. Large imperial buil- hard, quasi- industrially produced fired bricks. This ding projects in which often many thousands of construction method, later called opus testaceum, workers had to be organised and directed required was uniquely suited to surviving the passage of the definition and implementation of standards time. For us today, this means that we have at our applicable right across the site. To ensure the suc- disposal an extraordinary wealth of evidence for the cess of a major project these standards had to be building construction methods used in those times. laid down in series of technical regulations. The Given that even the building sites of classi- doctoral thesis on which the present paper is based cal antiquity were subject to market forces, the examined the extent to which the organisation of large building sites influenced masonry construc- tions and whether, using the characteristics of the masonry that will be defined below, this influence can be read as a regulative on the erection of the structures.
    [Show full text]
  • And Ninth-Century Rome: the Patrocinia of Diaconiae, Xenodochia, and Greek Monasteries*
    FOREIGN SAINTS AT HOME IN EIGHTH- AND NINTH-CENTURY ROME: THE PATROCINIA OF DIACONIAE, XENODOCHIA, AND GREEK MONASTERIES* Maya Maskarinec Rome, by the 9th century, housed well over a hundred churches, oratories, monasteries and other religious establishments.1 A substantial number of these intramural foundations were dedicated to “foreign” saints, that is, saints who were associated, by their liturgical commemoration, with locations outside Rome.2 Many of these foundations were linked to, or promoted by Rome’s immigrant population or travelers. Early medieval Rome continued to be well connected with the wider Mediterranean world; in particular, it boasted a lively Greek-speaking population.3 This paper investigates the correlation between “foreign” institutions and “foreign” cults in early medieval Rome, arguing that the cults of foreign saints served to differentiate these communities, marking them out as distinct units in Rome, while at the same time helping integrate them into Rome’s sacred topography.4 To do so, the paper first presents a brief overview of Rome’s religious institutions associated with eastern influence and foreigners. It * This article is based on research conducted for my doctoral dissertation (in progress) entitled “Building Rome Saint by Saint: Sanctity from Abroad at Home in the City (6th-9th century).” 1 An overview of the existing religious foundations in Rome is provided by the so-called “Catalogue of 807,” which I discuss below. For a recent overview, see Roberto Meneghini, Riccardo Santangeli Valenzani, and Elisabetta Bianchi, Roma nell'altomedioevo: topografia e urbanistica della città dal V al X secolo (Rome: Istituto poligrafico e zecca dello stato, 2004) (hereafter Meneghini, Santangeli Valenzani, and Bianchi, Roma nell'altomedioevo).
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gods and Their Worship
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-53212-9 — Roman Religion Valerie M. Warrior Excerpt More Information CHAPTER 1 - TH E GODS AND TH EIR WORSHIP © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-53212-9 — Roman Religion Valerie M. Warrior Excerpt More Information We Romans are far superior in religio, by which I mean the worship of the gods (cultus deorum). (Cicero, On the Nature of the Gods 2.8) There is no place in our city that is not filled with a sense of religion (religiones) and the gods. There are as many days fixed for annual sacrifices as there are places in which they can be performed. (Livy 5.52) - uins of ancient temples, interspersed among the excavated remains of Rthe ancient city, still bear witness that Rome was indeed a city filled with gods and a sense of religion. Prominent among the remains in the Roman Forum are the temples of Castor, Saturn, Vesta, and the deified emperor Antoninus Pius and his wife Faustina. Overlooking the Roman Forum is the Capitoline Hill, the site of the temple of Jupiter the Best and Greatest. In the area of the Forum Holitorium near the river Tiber, the modern tourist can see ancient columns incorporated into a side wall of the church of San Nicola in Carcere. In the Campus Martius area, the emperor Hadrian’s reconstruction of the Pantheon stands in all its grandeur amid the hustle and bustle of contemporary Rome, still bearing the inscription commemorating its original builder, Marcus Agrippa, who was a close associate of the emperor Augustus.
    [Show full text]