DOCSLIB.ORG

Administrative Territorial Accessories Transboundary Part of the Western

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Administrative Territorial Accessories Transboundary Part of the Western Dr. Aleh TAKARCHUK Associate professor of the Department of Geography and Nature Management of A.S. Pushkin Brest State University International Public Association «EKAPRAEKT», Brest office, Chairman Western Bug basin: physico-geographical conditions, water formation, economic development (on the example of the transboundary part of the basin) ADDRESSING COMMON CHALLENGES OF THE BALTIC SEA BASIN BY WORKING ON INTEGRATED RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT, MICROPLASTIC & LITTER INPUTS, Joint Projects’ Conference Druskininkai, Lithuania, 18-19 December 2017 THE SITUATION OF THE WESTERN BUG RIVER BASIN IN EUROPE AND WITHIN THE VISTULA RIVER BASIN 1 TRANSBOUNDARY ASPECT. OBJECT AND SUBJECT OF RESEARCH 2 The object of the study is the transboundary part of the Western Bug River basin BELARUS Cities POLAND (the population is more 50 000) The Western Bug river basin – 39,4 thousand km2 Transboundary part of the basin – 30,0 thousand km2 (76% from the whole area of the basin), including: within Ukraine – 10,8 thousand km2 UKRAINE within Poland – 10,0 thousand km2 within Belarus – 9,2 thousand km2 The subject of the study is the territorial heterogeneity of the conditions for the formation of surface waters, the water regime of rivers and the flow of water ADMINISTRATIVE TERRITORIAL ACCESSORIES TRANSBOUNDARY 3 PART OF THE WESTERN BUG RIVER BASIN BELARUS Brest region UKRAINE Volyn region Lviv region POLAND Lubelskie Administrative Centers Podlaskie The border of the transboundary part of the Mazowieckie Western Bug River basin PHYSICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL HETEROGENEITY TRANSBOUNDARY PART OF THE WESTERN BUG RIVER BASIN 4 District Area The Lukow Plain (318.9-a) South Podlasie plain (318.9) The valley of the breakthrough of the Western Bug River (318.9-b) BELARUS Rostock (343.2-a) Southern Rostock (343.2-a) The Pruzhany plain (841.1-a) Western Predpolesie (841.1) Vysokovskaya Plain (844.1-b) The Lęčyci-Włodawa Plain (845.2-a) Shatskaya Plain (845.2-b) Kodenska Plain (845.2-c) The Malorita plain (845.2-d) Western Polesie (845.2) Upper-Pripyat Plain (845.2-e) POLAND The Brest Plain (845.2-f) UKRAINE The Lomaz Plain (845.2-g) The Western Bug River Valley (845.2-h) The Lyuboml plain (845.3-a) The Helm plain (845.3-b) Volyn Polesye (845.3) The Western Bug River Valley (845.3-c) Upper Bug plain (845.7-a) Small Polesye (845.7) Pobuzhskaya Hollow (845.7-b) Sokal ridge (851.1-a) Hrubieszów-Ivanicev hollow The Volyn Upland (851.1) (851.1-b) Gorodel'sko-Sokhtchiv ridge (851.1-c) Podil Upland (851.3) Gologoro-Voronyak Range (851.3-a) NATURAL DISTRIBUTION OF SURFACE WATER 5 Cтруктуры бассейнового строения watercourseПорядки водот оordersков элelementaryементарные в оwatershedsдосборы 1 2 3 4 5 элelementaryементарные п рriverineиречья watersheds водоемы а. – structure of the hydrographic network b. – structure of the basin HYDROLOGICAL POSTS. FEATURES OF THE WATER FLOW 6 Representative posts Hydrological posts Watershed, km2 1. Western Bug (Sasov) 107,0 2. Svinja (Zholkwa) 96,6 3. Poltva (Busk) 1440,0 4. Rata (Mezhirechye) 1740,0 5. Soloccia (Chervonograd) 931,0 6. Khuchwa (Gozduw) 1215,0 7. Luga (Vladimir-Volynsky) 1270,0 8. Uherka (Ruda Opalin) 433,0 9. Vlodavka (Okuninka) 576,0 10. channel Orekhovsky (Melenkovo) 1070,0 11. Kopayuvka (Czersk) 461,0 12. Ryta (Small Radvanichi) 968,0 13. Zeliava (Perkowice) 955,0 14. Lesnaya (Kamianets) 1920,0 15. Pulva (Vysokoje) 317,0 16. Ksna (Poryosyuki) 1210,0 Transit posts Hydrological posts Watershed, km2 A. Western Bug (Kamenka Bugskaya) 2360,0 B. Western Bug (Sokal) 6250,0 water flow, mm C. Western Bug (Strzyzów) 8944,6 D. Western Bug (Dorohusk) 12398,7 E. Western Bug (Wlodawa) 14410,0 F. Western Bug (Kshychev) 26284,0 Hydrological posts G. Mukhavets (Brest) 6590,0 H. Ksna (Malova Gura) 3127,7 representative transit I. Lesnaya (Tyukhinichi) 2590,0 FEATURES OF WATER REGIME OF RIVERS 7 3,50 18 1,60 16 Q, куб. м/c 14 Q, м/с куб. 12 0,00 0,00 01.11.82 01.12.82 01.01.83 01.02.83 01.03.83 01.04.83 01.05.83 01.06.83 01.07.83 01.08.83 01.09.83 01.10.83 01.11.82 01.12.82 01.01.83 01.02.83 01.03.83 01.04.83 01.05.83 01.06.83 01.07.83 01.08.83 01.09.83 01.10.83 /с 10 3 Подольская Podilвозвышенность Upland Rostock 25,00 25,00 Q, м Q, 8 6 4 Q, м/c куб. Q, куб. м/с 2 0,00 0,00 0 01.11.82 01.12.82 01.01.83 01.02.83 01.03.83 01.04.83 01.05.83 01.06.83 01.07.83 01.08.83 01.09.83 01.10.83 01.11.82 01.12.82 01.01.83 01.02.83 01.03.83 01.04.83 01.05.83 01.06.83 01.07.83 01.08.83 01.09.83 01.10.83 Small Polesye Volyn Upland 1946 1951 1956 1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 16,00 9,00 р.КопаювкаKopayuvka (с.Черск)(Czersk) р.Рыта Ryta ( Small(с. Малые Radvanichi Радваничи)) р.ЛеснаяLesnaya (г.(Kamianets Каменец)) а. – change in average annual water discharge at hydrological posts, m3/s Q, м/c куб. Q, куб. м/с 45 0,00 0,00 01.11.1982 01.12.1982 01.01.1983 01.02.198301.03.1983 01.04.1983 01.05.1983 01.06.1983 01.07.1983 01.08.1983 01.09.1983 01.10.1983 40 Volyn Polesye 01.11.1982 01.12.1982 01.01.1983Western01.02.1983 01.03.1983 01.04.1983 01.05.1983 01.06.1983Polesie01.07.1983 01.08.1983 01.09.1983 01.10.1983 35 4,00 25,00 30 /с 3 25 Q, м/c куб. Q, м/c куб. 20 Полтва (г. Буск) Q, м Poltva (Busk) 15 Рата (с. Межеречье) 0,00 Rata (Mezhirechye) 01.11.1982 01.12.1982 01.01.1983 01.02.198301.03.1983 01.04.1983 01.05.1983 01.06.1983 01.07.1983 01.08.1983 01.09.1983 01.10.1983 0,00 10 ВлодавкаVlodavka (с. Окунинка) (Okuninka) Western 01.11.1982 01.12.1982 01.01.1983South01.02.1983 01.03.1983 01.04.1983 01.05.1983 Podlasie01.06.1983 01.07.1983 01.08.1983 01.09.1983 01.10.1983 plain 5 МухавецMukhavets (г. Брест) (Brest) Predpolesie 0 КшнаKsna (с. (МаловаMalova Гура) Gura) XI XII I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X ЛеснаяLesnaya (г. Каменец) (Kamianets) c. – typical intra-annual distribution of water flow of b. – change in average monthly water discharge at hydrological stations, m3/s rivers within the physico-geographical districts HYDROLOGICALV DISTRIBUTION 8 IV V Seasonal distribution of runoff within hydrological subareas IV Seasonal water flow in% of annual Area Subarea Summer– Spring Winter autumn (III–V) (XII–II) III (VI–XI) З а п . Б А I. Podolsky 32–36 41–45 22–23 у г В II. Malopolessky 41–44 35–37 21–22 III В III. Volynsky 36–44 28–30 28–34 II В IV. Polessky 47–57 15–27 21–31 V. Podlasko- II В 33–46 22–36 31–33 I Predpolesski I SeasonalСезонный сwaterток flow А – Mid-European hydrological region вSpringесна В – Eastern European Hydrological Area лето - осень Summer–autumnСез онный сток зWinterима весна лето - осень зима ANALYSIS OF THE TERRITORIAL DIFFERENTIATION OF THE 9 CONDITIONS FOR THE FORMATION OF SURFACEL1 WATERS.L2 L4 l1 L6 Беларусь THE PROBLEM OF CHOOSING TERRITORIAL UNITSL3 l2 OFL5 ANALYSIS M2 M1 B24 l5 l4 l3 l6 M9 m4 m1 M3 B25 B23 L1 M5 K6 b17 l7m6 Lm23 K4K5 K7 k4 ML140 l1 ML66 Беларусь k2 b16 M13 L3M8 l2 mL52 K3 k1 K11 m5 M7 M4 M1 K1 K8 k3 K10 B22 l5 l4 l3 M2 b15 B24 X2 B21 M12 l6 m4 m1 M3 K2 B23 M9 Польша K9 B2B025 Mb1117 Xl73 m3 M5 B19 bK164 K7 m6 K4K5 k4 b16 M10M8 M6 m2 K3 k1w1 k2 X1 K11 M13 M7 M4 W3 K8 k3 K10 B22 m5 KW1 1W2 Украина X2 b13 b15 B21 M12 ПольUш3а u1 Kb212 K9 B20 U2 B17B19 b14 M11 X3 U1 b11 B16 B18 B14Bw131 X1 B15 b10W1 B1W2 3 Украина H8 b8 b9W2 b1L3g7 H7 U3 u1lg3 Lg6 Lg5 H6 h2 U2 B11 b1l2g2B1L7g3 H5 H4B10bU71 lg1 b11Lg4B16 H2 h1 bB618 Lg2B1L4gB113 H1 H3 B9 B1B58b10 B12 S2 b5 H8 b9 s1 b8 Lg7 S1 H7 B7 lg3 Lg6 Lg5 R7 Hb64 h2 B11 lg2 Lg3 R1 r2 H5 b3H4B10b7 lg1 Lg4 R2 r1 R6 h1 b6 Lg2 Lg1 R5 H2B5 HB36B9 R3 H1 b2 b5 B8 R4 P5 BS42 B3 P4 S1 b1 s1 B1 B7 P1 p1 R7 P6 B2 b4 P2R1P3 r2 R2 R6 b3 R5 r1 B6 R3 B5 b2 Типы малых водосборов R4 P5 B4 B3 границы малых водосборов P4 b1 B1 чpartialастичны еriver водо сbasinsборы P1 p1 P6 B2 границы элементарных структур P2 P3 бассейнового строения чriversideастичные п риречья Типы малых водосборов границы малых водосборов границы государств границы элементарных структур частичные водосборы а. – ratio of small river basins and elementary бассейнового строения b. – ratio of чtypesастичны ofе п рsmallиречья river basins units of the basin structure границы государств ESTIMATION OF THE TERRITORIAL HETEROGENEITY OF CONDITIONS FOR THE FORMATION OF WATER FLOW 10 Показатель нормы стока (куб. м/сек) Показатель лесистости (%) оч0,1‒23,78ень низки й (0.1 - 23.78) о2,42‒21,288чень низкий (2.42 - 21.288) ни23,78‒47,46зкий (23.78 - 47.46) н21,228‒40,156изкий (21.288 - 40.156) ср47,76‒71,14едний (47.4 6 - 71.14) с40,156‒59,024редний (40.156 - 59.024) вы71,14‒94,82сокий (71.1 4 - 94.82) в59,024‒77,892ысокий (59.024 - 77.892) оч94,82‒118,5ень высокий (94.82 - 118.5) о77,892‒96,76чень высокий (77.892 - 96.76) стnoок отсутствует Share of forests (%) Water flow m3/s Показатель нормы стока (куб.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • E40 Inland Waterway - International
    E40 Inland Waterway - international - Sectors: Construction Active This profile is actively maintained Send feedback on this profile Created on: May 22 2018 Last update: Aug 24 2021 Contact: Helen Byron, Frankfurt Zoological Society Project website Status Planning Design Agreement Construction Operation Closure Decommission Sectors Construction Location Status Planning Design Agreement Construction Operation Closure Decommission About E40 Inland Waterway The E40 Inland Waterway (E40 IWW) is a transnational project aimed at establishing a 2,000 km Black-to-Baltic-Sea inland waterway through Poland, Belarus and Ukraine connecting the seaports of Gdansk and Kherson. It consists of the following rivers and canals: Vistula, Bug (new canal to be built), Mukhavets, Pina, Pripyat and Dnieper. The reconstruction plans of the E40 mention building a bypass canal in Poland, six or seven dams and locks in the Pripyat, as well as dredging on the entire route so that multitonnage river-sea vessels can follow the course of the rivers. The biggest part of the capital investments (around EUR 12 billion) is directed to the Polish section of the route Vistula—Brest. The Belarusian section has been preliminarily estimated at EUR 150 million. Latest developments Environmental consent for the Siarzewo Dam on the Vistula River revoked Aug 24 2021 E40 waterway recognised as top global biodiversity issue Dec 4 2020 Why this profile? The E40 Inland Waterway is expected to endanger valuable natural areas in Poland, Belarus and Ukraine. These include 29 protected areas in Poland, some of which are part of the Natura 2000 network, about 27 areas in Ukraine, including two natural reserves, six national parks and the Chernobyl Radiation and Environmental Biosphere Reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Assessment of Reconstruction Plans for the Inland Waterway E40
    Business Union of Entrepreneurs and Employers named after Professor Kunyavsky Republican Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs Belarusian Scientific and Industrial Association ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF RECONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR THE INLAND WATERWAY E40 Prepared according to the agreement with ZGF of November 15, 2018 Approved by the Decree of the business unions of February 27, 2019 Minsk, February 2019 Business Union of Entrepreneurs and Employers named after Professor Kunyavsky 22, Factory street, Minsk, Belarus, 220033. bspn.by, phone: +375 17 298 27 92, email: [email protected] Abbreviations E40 Feasibility Study – The document “Restoration of Inland Waterway E40 Dnieper – Vistula: from Strategy to Planning. Final Feasibility Study Report”1 (Russian version). Maritime Institute in Gdansk, December 2015 EaP - Eastern Partnership EEU - Eurasian Economic Union EU - European Union IWW E40 – inland waterway E40 UNIDO - United Nations Industrial Development Organization Explanations The study contains two types of infographics: 1. Prepared by the author of this study. This infographic has sequence numbers: 1, 2, 3 etc. 2. Taken as quotes from the E40 Feasibility Study. The original numbering is retained in this infographic. We apply a mark (E40 Feasibility Study) to such infographics in our study. 1 Embassy of the Republic of Belarus in the Czech Republic. http://czech.mfa.gov.by/docs/e40restoration_feasibility_study_ru-29343.pdf 2 CONTENTS Introduction……………………………………………………………………………... 4 I Comparison of inland water transport of Poland, Belarus and Ukraine with other European countries……………………………………………………………………. 5 II Assessment of the economic part of the E40 Feasibility Study………………… 9 1. The main methodologies used in the world in assessing the economic efficiency of projects…………………………………………………………… 9 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Past, Current, and Future of the Central European Corridor for Aquatic Invasions in Belarus
    Biol Invasions (2008) 10:215–232 DOI 10.1007/s10530-007-9124-y ORIGINAL PAPER Past, current, and future of the central European corridor for aquatic invasions in Belarus Alexander Y. Karatayev Æ Sergey E. Mastitsky Æ Lyubov E. Burlakova Æ Sergej Olenin Received: 5 April 2007 / Accepted: 8 May 2007 / Published online: 25 July 2007 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 Abstract We analyzed the role of the waterways of first comprehensive review of aquatic exotic inverte- Belarus in the spread of aquatic exotic invertebrates brates in Belarus. Currently, 19 exotic aquatic through the central European invasion corridor. invertebrates are known in Belarus, including 14 Present day Belarus became critically important species of Ponto-Caspian origin. The rate of spread of when in the end of the 18th—beginning of the 19th aquatic invasive species in the second half of the 20th century three interbasin canals connecting rivers from century increased 7-fold compared to the 19th— the Black and Baltic seas basins were constructed for beginning of the 20th century. We found a significant international trade. These canals became important positive correlation between the time since initial pathways facilitating the spread of aquatic alien invasion and number of waterbodies colonized. We species. For more than a hundred years, only Ponto- predict a further increase in the rate of colonization of Caspian species colonized Belarus using ships and Belarus by exotic invertebrates as well as an increase especially timber in rafts exported by Russia into in the diversity of vectors of spread and donor areas Western Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • SITUATION of HUMAN RIGHTS in BELARUS in 2014
    Human Rights Centre “Viasna” SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS in BELARUS in 2014 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Minsk, 2015 SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN BELARUS in 2014 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Author and compiler: Tatsiana Reviaka Editor and author of the foreword: Valiantsin Stefanovich The edition was prepared on the basis of reviews of human rights violations in Belarus published every month in 2014. Each of the monthly reviews includes an analysis of the most important events infl uencing the observance of human rights and outlines the most eloquent and characteristic facts of human rights abuses registered over the described period. The review was prepared on the basis of personal appeals of victims of human rights abuses and the facts which were either registered by human rights activists or reported by open informational sources. The book features photos from the archive of the Human Rights Center “Viasna”, as well as from publications on the websites of Radio Free Europe/ Radio Liberty Belarus service, the Nasha Niva newspaper, tv.lrytas.lt, baj.by, gazetaby.com, and taken by Franak Viachorka and Siarhei Hudzilin. Human Rights Situation in 2014: Trends and Evaluation The situation of human rights during 2014 remained consistently poor with a tendency to deterioration at the end of the year. Human rights violations were of both systemic and systematic nature: basic civil and political rights were extremely restricted, there were no systemic changes in the fi eld of human rights (at the legislative level and (or) at the level of practices). The only positive development during the year was the early release of Ales Bialiatski, Chairman of the Human Rights Centre “Viasna” and Vice-President of the International Federation for Human Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Castles, Fortresses, Towers
    www.belarustourism.by hospitality beyond borders Castles, Fortresses, Towers Islands of inviolacy and puissance in the ocean of the centuries-long history Castles, Fortresses, Towers 1 11 2 9 5 12 16 6 7 12 3 11 8 17 4 14 3 13 3 1 13 4 19 10 18 14 5 15 6 Table of content 1. Mir Castle . .2 16 2. Nesvizh Castle and Palace Ensemble . 4 3. Novogrudok castle . .6 7 4. Lubcha Castle. 8 5. Krevo Castle . 10 6. Golshany Castle. .11 17 7. Grodno Castles. 12 8. Bykhov Castle . .13 8 9. Smolyany castle . .14 10. Mozyr Castle. 15 11. Lida castle. 16 18 12. Zaslavl Castle . .17 13. Synkovichi Bastion Church. .18 9 14. Malomazheyki Church. 19 15. Kamai Catholic Church. .20 16. Haityushniki House-castle . .21 19 17. Bobrujsk fortress. 22 10 18. Brest Fortress . 23 19. Kamenets Tower . 24 Родовые дворцы и усадьбы ear travelers! Are you craving for the medieval mysteries and unforgettable impressions, exciting trips and new discoveries? Welcome to Belarus! It is often called “the country of castles”. The first stone fortresses appeared here in the XIIth century! The tower of Kamenets rising on the western border of Belarus has been an amazing example of the beauty and grace for more than 7 centuries. Mir and Nesvizh castles included into the UNESCO World Heritage list are stunning and unique constructions. Brest fortress walls remember lots of historic events – tragic as well as fascinating. In this edition we present the most interesting objects of the defense architecture of Belarus. However there are far more of them than this brochure can include.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Proceedings
    International Baltic Earth Secretariat Publication No. 2, May 2014 2nd International Conference on Climate Change - The environmental and socio-economic response in the Southern Baltic region Szczecin, Poland, 12-15 May 2014 Conference Proceedings Editors: Andrzej Witkowski, Jan Harff and Marcus Reckermann Impressum International Baltic Earth Secretariat Publications ISSN 2198-4247 International Baltic Earth Secretariat Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht GmbH Max-Planck-Str. 1 D-21502 Geesthacht, Germany www.baltic-earth.eu [email protected] Front page photo: The beach at Międzyzdroje with its steep moraine coast, Island of Wolin, Poland (Marcus Reckermann) Organized and sponsored by University of Szczecin Baltic Earth, the successor to BALTEX Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht West Pomeranian University of Technology Government of the Maratime Academy of Szczecin Wojewodztwo Zachodniopomorskie i Scientific Conference Committee Ulrich Bathmann, Germany Jacek Batóg, Poland Artur Bejger, Poland Ryszard Borowka, Poland Achim Brauer, Germany Boris Chubaraenko, Russia Witold Cieslikiewicz, Poland Marek Dutkowski, Poland Peter Fröhle, Germany Kazimierz Furmańczyk, Poland Jan Harff, Poland Aarno Kotilainen, Finland Roman Marks, Poland Stanislaw Massel, Poland Markus Meier, Sweden Zygmund Meyer, Poland Stanislaw Musielak, Poland Irina Partasenok, Belarus Janusz Pempkowiak, Poland Hans von Storch, Germany Jürgen Sündermann, Germany Andrzej Witkowski, Poland Eduardo Zorita, Germany Organizing Committee Jan Harff, Poland Roman Marks, Poland Marcus Reckermann,
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Environment in the Republic of Belarus
    THE MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS STATE SCIENTIFIC ESTABLISHMENT «INSTITUTE OF NATURAL MANAGEMENT NATIONAL SCIENCE ACADEMY OF BELARUS» THE STATE OF ENVIRONMENT IN THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS NATIONAL REPORT Minsk «Beltamozhservice» 2010 UDC 502(476)(047.1) Editorial board of the Ministry of natural resources and environmental protection of the Republic of Belarus Ambrazhevich M.L., Germenchuk M.G., Dobritsky A.V., Zharkina A.I., Komosko I.V., Kuzmenkov S.K., Panteleeva O.A., Pilipchuk A.S., Rudko I.V., Rusaya I.E., Savich O.V., Savchenko V.V., Trafimovich T.F. Prepared by: Kadatskaya O.V., Sanets E.V., Bykova N.K., Ovcharova E.P. The state of environment in the Republic of Belarus: Nat. report / the Ministry of natural resources and environmental protection of the Republic of Belarus, State scientific establishment «Institute of natural management National science academy of Belarus». – Minsk: Beltamozhservice, 2010. – 150 p. ISBN 978-985-6667-85-8. In the national report «The state of environment of the Republic of Belarus» there is information which characterizes the condition and change tendencies for last five years (2005-2009) of atmospheric air, surface waters, plant and animal life according to the international ecological indicators are presented. Features of use and protection of water, ground and biological resources of the country are reflected, priority directions of the state policy of the environment protection, including management of nature protection activity, the ecological information, formation and education, international cooperation are shown. The report is prepared for state structures of management, scientific and public organizations, the country, and also foreign partners by the objective information about the state of environment of the Republic of Belarus, natural resources of the country and their protection.
    [Show full text]
  • The Selected Hydrotechnical Conditions of the Dnieper – Bug
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Bulletin of the Maritime Institute in Gdańsk The selected hydrotechnical conditions of the Dnieper – Bug Channel and the Pripyat River in the development of the International Waterway E40 Wybrane warunki hydrotechniczne kanału Dniepr – Bug i rzeki Prypeć w rozwoju Międzynarodowej Drogi Wodnej E40 Marcin Kalinowski1, Rafał Koba1, Patrycja Jerzyło2 1Instytut Morski w Gdańsku. Zakład Ekonomiki i Prawa 2Politechnika Gdańska. Wydział Inżynierii Lądowej i Środowiska Article history: Received: 15.09.2017 Accepted: 15.12.2017 Published: 30.12.2017 Abstract: International waterway E40 (MDW E40) is included in the network of inland waterways of transnational importance. It is a link between two areas: the Baltic Sea and the Black Sea. The E40 route runs through three countries: Poland, Belarus, and Ukraine. The article presents the results of the study on the analysis of two very important sections of the MDW E40 on the Belarusian section, namely: the Dnieper – Bug Channel and the Pripy River. Both elements, from the point of view of navigability, are the most important links throughout the Belarusian section of the waterway. This article will be useful for the development of plans for revitalization of the international waterw ay E40 not only on the Belarus part, but also in Poland and Ukraine. Due to the accession and signature by Poland of the AGN Convention in January 2017, the article can constitute a material to supporting state policy in the context of the = the inland waterway system’s development in Poland and Europe. Keywords: Dnieper – Bug channel, AGN convention, E40 Inland Waterway, revitalization, inland navigation Streszczenie: Międzynarodowa droga wodna E40 (MDW E40) wpisana jest w sieć dróg wodnych śródlądowych o znaczeniu ponadnaro- dowym.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pathways Risk Assessment of Aquatic Non-Indigenous Macroinvertebrates Passing To, and Through, the Central European Invasion Corridor
    Management of Biological Invasions (2020) Volume 11, Issue 3: 525–540 CORRECTED PROOF Risk Assessment A pathways risk assessment of aquatic non-indigenous macroinvertebrates passing to, and through, the Central European invasion corridor Tatsiana Lipinskaya1,*, Vitaliy Semenchenko1 and Dan Minchin2,3 1Scientific and Practical Centre of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus for Bioresources, 27 Akademicheskaya St, 220072 Minsk, Belarus 2Marine Research Institute, Klaipėda University, LT-92294 Klaipėda, Lithuania 3Marine Organism Investigations, Marina Village, Ballina, Killaloe, Co Clare, Ireland Author e-mails: [email protected] (TL), [email protected] (VS), [email protected] (DM) *Corresponding author Citation: Lipinskaya T, Semenchenko V, Minchin D (2020) A pathways risk Abstract assessment of aquatic non-indigenous macroinvertebrates passing to, and A pathways risk assessment is a part of an integrated assessment for the horizon through, the Central European invasion scanning of non-indigenous species introductions. We examined past pathways, corridor. Management of Biological and their vectors, of aquatic NIS already present in Belarus in order to predict those Invasions 11(3): 525–540, https://doi.org/10. species likely to spread to Belarus and arrive to Western Europe along the Central 3391/mbi.2020.11.3.12 European invasion corridor. Twenty-four aquatic non-indigenous macroinvertebrates Received: 22 October 2019 are known within Belarusian rivers, lakes and reservoirs, six of these have already Accepted: 22 June 2020 spread westwards through Belarus. The modes of spread for these NIS were vessel Published: 12 August 2020 transport, navigation corridors, and natural spread following an initial introduction. Thematic editor: Calum MacNeil Key words: alien species, benthos, vectors, waterbodies, Belarus Copyright: © Lipinskaya et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Transboundary Rivers Between Ukraine, Russia and the EU – Identification of Science-Based Goals and Fostering Trilateral Dialogue and Cooperation”
    “Management of Transboundary Rivers between Ukraine, Russia and the EU – Identification of Science-Based Goals and Fostering Trilateral Dialogue and Cooperation” Project acronym: ManTra-Rivers Chalov S, Pluntke T, Nabyvanets Y, Kruhlov I, Helm B, Terskii P, Krengel F, Osadcha N, Habel M, Osadcha N, Osadchyi V, Reeh T, Karthe D and Bernhofer C Report on WP A– Assessment of the status quo in the three investigated basins Funding agency Volkswagen Stiftung Project coordinator Technische Universitat Dresden (TUD), Germany Project partner Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research (UFZ), Germany Lomonosov Moscow State University (LMU), Russia Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute (UHMI), Kiev, Ukraine Content Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 1. General information about investigated basins .......................................................................... 4 1.1 General features in the XXI century .................................................................................................... 4 1.1.1 Western Dvina ....................................................................................................................... 5 1.1.2. Desna ........................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1.3. Western Bug .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kayaking Along the Bug River Kayaking Along the Bug River
    Kayaking along the Bug river Kayaking along the Bug river Kayaking www.lubelskie.pl KAYAKING ALONG THE BUG RIVER WOJEWÓDZTWO LUBELSKIE Editorial co-fi nanced by the European Regional Development Fund under the framework tourist guide of Regional Operational Programme of the Lubelskie Region 2007–2013. The Borderland Bug N www.lubelskie.pl Published by Marshal’s Offi ce of Lubelskie Voivodeship 20-074 Lublin, ul. Spokojna 4 tel.: +48 81 44 16 789 fax: +48 81 44 16 790 e-mail: [email protected], www.lubelskie.pl Text by: Józef Tworek Proofreading by: Adam Niedbał Figures and maps by: Józef Tworek Coordination of the project – Piotr Franaszek, Darek Donica (Director of the Promotion and Tourism Department) Publishing coordination: Joanna Opiela-Basińska Photos by: Olgierd Bielak, Daniel Dadun, Marcin Dąbrowski, Lesław Flaga, Jacek Fuchs, Stanisław Gębski, Marta Gołębiowska, Agnieszka Jaroszyńska, Grzegorz Jaworski, Marzena Kalinowska, Krzysztof Kowalczyk, Andrzej Koziara, Kamila Lis, Kalina Łapińska (Lublin Landscape Parks Complex archive), Andrzej Łazeba, Marek Pomietło, Leon Sapko, Rafał Siek, Monika Tarajko, Stanisław Turski, Józef Tworek, Maciek Zbarachewicz, Michał Zieliński, Tadeusz Żaczek and archives: Marshal’s Offi ce of Lubelskie Voivodeship, PTTK Włodawa, UKS KIKO Zamość, www.kajaki.nadbugiem.pl ISBN 978-83-63221-41-6 FREE COPY WOJEWÓDZTWO LUBELSKIE Editorial co-fi nanced by the European Regional Development Fund under the framework of Regional Operational Programme of the Lubelskie Region 2007–2013. Translated by: AGIT Agnieszka Rydz Graphic design: Krzysztof Hosaja (Amistad Sp. z o.o.) Typesetting and printed by: Drukarnia Comernet Kayaking along the Bug River Józef Tworek KAYAKING ALONG THE BUG RIVER Second Revised Edition tourist guide 2 Kayaking along the Bug River TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword .
    [Show full text]
  • ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS Vol. 5, No. 3, 2020 QUALITY LEVEL of SURFACE WATER at the CONTROL POINTS of the WESTERN BUG RIVER (LVIV
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS Vol. 5, No. 3, 2020 QUALITY LEVEL OF SURFACE WATER AT THE CONTROL POINTS OF THE WESTERN BUG RIVER (LVIV REGION) Zoryana Оdnorih1, Roman Manko2, Мyroslav Malovanyy1, Christina Soloviy1 1 Lviv Polytechnic National University, 12, S. Bandery Str., Lviv 79013, Ukraine, 2 Department of water cadaster and water monitoring Water basin management of the Western Bug and San rivers, 14, Krushelnytski Family Str., Lviv 79017, Ukraine, [email protected] https://doi.org/10.23939/ep2020.03.125 Received: 07.05.2020 © Оdnorih Z., Manko R., Malovanyy M., Soloviy C., 2020 Abstract. The article analyzes the negative impact of river network value of 0.34 km/km2. In Ukraine, there enterprises and public utilities on the surface water quality of are more than 4 thousand rivers longer than 10 km, of the Western Bug River basin (within the Lviv region). The which 117 are over 100 km long. There are 0.25 km dynamics of changes of indicators of the main pollutants at six of rivers per 1 km of the country`s territory [1]. The control points (2016–2018) and the assessment of surface main source of nutrition of rivers and the formation of water quality for 2018 are presented. It is proposed to replace the control units on the Western Bug River and its tributaries water resources of Ukraine is the precipitation, which 3 in order to obtain more accurate information and improve the averages 366 km (or 609 mm). However, only a 3 work on the basin water management. small part of them (about 50 km , or 83 mm) forms an annual runoff.
    [Show full text]