Materials and Articles for Contact with Packaging Gases, Propellants, Air Or Compressed Air for Food Production Or Food Processing
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Food Allergen Management in Foodservice – a Best Practice Guideline
national allergy strategy Food Allergen Management in Foodservice A BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINE Developed by Statewide Foodservices Qld. Health This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial V4.0 International licence. To view a copy of this Block 7 Level 7 Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital, licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.en Butterfield St., Herston Qld 4029 You are free to copy, communicate and adapt the work for non- Ph. (07) 3646 2288 commercial purposes, as long as you attribute the State of Queensland (Queensland Health) and comply with the licence terms. [email protected] For copyright permissions beyond the scope of this licence contact: Intellectual Property Officer, Queensland Health, © State of Queensland (Queensland Health) 2018 email [email protected], phone (07) 3708 5069. PAGE 1 FOOD ALLERGEN MANAGEMENT IN FOODSERVICE – A BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINE Background Standards Added Sulphites in concentrations of 10 mg/kg or more In managing food allergies in health care foodservices there Cereals containing gluten and their products, namely, wheat, rye, barley, oats and spelt and their hybridised strains are overarching practices that are required as per the Food Crustacea and their products Standards Code (FSANZ) that will inform and support the Egg and egg products process of identifying, assessing, managing and auditing Fish and fish products, except for isinglass derived from swim bladders and the risk of food allergies in the food service. used as a clarifying agent in beer and wine Milk and milk products Peanuts and peanut products These include – Food Standards Australia & New Zealand (Chapter 1 – Food Allergen Labelling - A food allergy occurs when a person’s immune system Sesame seeds and sesame seed products reacts to allergens that are harmless to other people. -
Outline What Are What Are Processing a Processing Aids?
The Issue of Undeclared Ingredients in Halal ﻗﺿﻳﺔ اﻟﻣﻛوﻧﺎت ﻏﻳر اﻟﻣﻌﻠﻧﺔ ﻓﻲ اﻷﻏذﻳﺔ ا ﻟ ﻣ ﺟ ﻬ زة اﻟﺣﻼﻝ؟ Food Processing اﻟﺗرﻛﻳز ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﺎﻟﺟﺎت اﻟﺗﺻﻧﻳﻌﻳﺔ A Focus on Processing Aids أ.د. ﻣﻳﺎن ﻣﺣﻣد ﻧدﻳم رﻳﺎض .Mian N. Riaz, Ph.D ﻣدﻳر أﺑﺣﺎث اﻟﺑروﺗﻳن، ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺗﻛﺳﺎس أﻳﻪ أﻧد أم، ﺗﺎﻣو، اﻟوﻻﻳﺎت Food Protein R&D Center; Texas A&M University اﻟﻣﺗﺣدة اﻷﻣرﻳﻛﻳﺔ College Station, Texas USA ورشة الحﻻل اﻷولى First Halal Workshop 11 مايو May, 2014 2014 11 معھد الكويت لﻷبحاث العلمية Kuwait Institute for Scientific دولة الكويت Research, State of Kuwait Outline What are Processing AAids?ids? Processing aids and Hidden Ingredients Processing aids and Hidden Ingredients What are processing aids?aids? Processing aids are substances that are approved by both the Sources of processing aidsaids Food and Drug Administration Why use processing aids and hidden (FDA) and the U.S. Department ingredients? of Agriculture (USDA) Are All hidden ingredients are Halal? They are used in the production Examples of hidden ingredients of a variety of foods – meat, Control of Halal food processing aid poultry, produce, etc., and are and hidden ingredients not present in any significant amount in the finished product What are Processing Aids? What are Processing aids? Processing Aids and Hidden Ingredients Processing Aids and Hidden Ingredients The use of food Both the FDA and USDA recognize three situations in which a processing aid has manufacturing substance is deemed to be a processing aid: become more prominent in recent 11.. When substances are added to a food during processing years, due to the but subsequently removed before the food reaches its finished increased production form (example activated charcoals which filter out impurities) of prepared, processed, and convenience foods What are Processing aids? What are Processing aids? Processing Aids and Hidden Ingredients Processing Aids and Hidden Ingredients 2. -
Mt Handbook 0.Pdf
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1. Status, market size and scope of fruit and vegetable processing 4 industry in India 1.2. Selection and procurement 5 1.3. Supply chain of fruits and vegetables 15 1.4. Pack house handling of fruits and vegetables 19 1.5. Primary Processing of Fruits and Vegetables 26 1.6. Unit operations in fruits and vegetables processing 30 1.7. Minimal Processing of Fruits and Vegetables 42 Chapter 2: Value addition of Fruits and Vegetables 2.1. Processing of fruit pulp/puree 49 2.2. Processing of Jams 50 2.3. Processing of Jellies 54 2.4. Processing of osmotic dehydrated product 59 2.5. Preservation by chemicals 63 2.6. Processing of Sauce 65 2.7. Processing of Ketchup 67 2.8. Processing of Pickles 73 2.9. Processing of Chutneys 80 2.10. Processing of Fruit Juices 82 Chapter 3: Packaging of Fruits and Vegetable Products 3.1. Levels, functions and desirable features of packaging 93 3.2. Packaging materials and their properties 95 3.3. Special Packaging systems 112 3.4. Properties/characteristics of foods, packaging requirement and 115 methods 3.5. MAP of fruits and vegetables 116 3.6. Mechanical injuries of fruits and vegetables 118 3.7. Shelf life of packaged food and its determination 121 3.8. Storage of Fruits and Vegetables 124 Chapter 4: Food safety regulations & certification 4.1. Need for testing of food 130 4.2. List of Notified Reference Laboratories in India – 1 131 4.3. List of Notified Reference Laboratories in India – 2 132 4.4. -
No 1333/2008 of the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT and of the COUNCIL of 16 December 2008 on Food Additives (Text with EEA Relevance)
2008R1333 — EN — 21.04.2015 — 022.001 — 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents ►B REGULATION (EC) No 1333/2008 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 December 2008 on food additives (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 354, 31.12.2008, p. 16) Amended by: Official Journal No page date ►M1 Commission Regulation (EU) No 238/2010 of 22 March 2010 L 75 17 23.3.2010 ►M2 Commission Regulation (EU) No 1129/2011 of 11 November 2011 L 295 1 12.11.2011 ►M3 amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1152/2013 of 19 L 311 1 20.11.2013 November 2013 ►M4 Commission Regulation (EU) No 1130/2011 of 11 November 2011 L 295 178 12.11.2011 ►M5 Commission Regulation (EU) No 1131/2011 of 11 November 2011 L 295 205 12.11.2011 ►M6 Commission Regulation (EU) No 232/2012 of 16 March 2012 L 78 1 17.3.2012 ►M7 Commission Regulation (EU) No 380/2012 of 3 May 2012 L 119 14 4.5.2012 ►M8 Commission Regulation (EU) No 470/2012 of 4 June 2012 L 144 16 5.6.2012 ►M9 Commission Regulation (EU) No 471/2012 of 4 June 2012 L 144 19 5.6.2012 ►M10 Commission Regulation (EU) No 472/2012 of 4 June 2012 L 144 22 5.6.2012 ►M11 Commission Regulation (EU) No 570/2012 of 28 June 2012 L 169 43 29.6.2012 ►M12 Commission Regulation (EU) No 583/2012 of 2 July 2012 L 173 8 3.7.2012 ►M13 Commission Regulation (EU) No 675/2012 of 23 July 2012 L 196 52 24.7.2012 ►M14 Commission Regulation (EU) No 1049/2012 of 8 November 2012 L 310 41 9.11.2012 ►M15 Commission Regulation (EU) No 1057/2012 of 12 November 2012 -
The Food Wars Thesis
.CHAPTER 1 THE FOOD WARS THESIS 'Ifyouknow before you look, you cannot see for knowing.' Sir Terry Frost RA (British artist 1915-2003) CORE ARGUMENTS Different visions for the future of food are shaping the potential for how food will be produced and marketed. Inevitably, there will be policy choices - for the state, the corporate sector and civil society. Human and environ mental health needs to be at the heart of these choices. Three broad conceptual frameworks or 'paradigms' pro pose the way forward for food policy, the food economy and health itself. All make claims to raise production and to deliver health benefits through food. The challenge for policy-makers is how to sift through the evidence and to give a fair hearing to a range of choices. This process is sometimes difficult because the relationship betweenevid ence and policy is not what it seems. The world of food is on the cusp of a far-reaching transition. INTRODUCTION The world is producingmore food than ever to feed more mouths than ever,' For the better off there are more food and beverage product choices than it is possible to imagine - globally 25,000 products in the average supermarket and more than 20,000 new packaged foods and beverages in 2002 alone.? Yet for many people there is a general feeling of unease and mistrust about the 12 FOOD WARS future of our food supply. Food and problems associated with producing and consuming food generate political and policy crises and are regular fodder for media coverage. In addition, along with the food production successes of the past 40 years in reducing famine, hunger continues hand in hand with excess. -
Australian Pilot Survey of Gm Food Labelling of Corn and Soy Food Products
AUSTRALIAN PILOT SURVEY OF GM FOOD LABELLING OF CORN AND SOY FOOD PRODUCTS by The TAG Working Group on GM Food Labelling June 2003 Table of Contents 1. SUMMARY............................................................................... 3 2. INTRODUCTION...................................................................... 4 2.1 Regulation of Food Produced Using Gene Technology.....................4 2.2 Australian Pilot Survey for GM Food Labelling ..................................5 2.3 Product Selection for the Survey .......................................................5 3. METHODS ............................................................................... 7 3.1 Sampling Programme........................................................................7 3.2 Testing Programme ...........................................................................7 3.3 Document Survey Methodology.........................................................8 4. RESULTS............................................................................... 10 4.1 Test Results.....................................................................................10 4.2 Documentation Survey Results .......................................................12 5. CONCLUSIONS..................................................................... 15 5.1 PCR Results ....................................................................................15 5.2 Documentation Survey Conclusions................................................19 6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ....................................................... -
Other Ingredients"
This is a work product of the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB). It does not represent official National Organic Program (NOP) positions or policy. National Organic Standards Board Handling Subcommittee Proposal Auxiliary/"Other Ingredients" January 29, 2013 Introduction On Nov. 23, 2011, National Organic Program (NOP) Deputy Administrator Miles McEvoy sent a Memorandum to the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) requesting clarification of “other ingredients” contained within handling materials on the National List of Allowed and Prohibited substance used in processed organic products. Since OFPA requires that each non-agricultural ingredient be specifically listed, and because the National List does not specifically list “other ingredients” commonly found in formulated products, the NOP identified the need for clarity and requested that the NOSB develop a policy that specifies whether these “other ingredients” are allowed. In the memo to NOSB, NOP requested the following: The NOP is requesting that the NOSB develop a policy on “other ingredients” in § 205.605 substances that is comparable to the comprehensive policy for crop and livestock materials. From this point forward, NOP is requesting that NOSB consider the presence of any “other ingredients” as part of its processes. As substances on the National List come up for sunset review, or as new petitions are considered, NOP requests that NOSB clarify whether any restrictions are warranted for “other ingredients” in § 205.605 substances. Any third-party technical report that NOP provides will include information on any “other ingredients” commonly found in the substance under review. NOP is requesting that NOSB specify any allowed “other ingredients” in the background section of its recommendations for substances recommended for listing on § 205.605, so that these allowances are clear to the organic trade, certifying agents, and NOP. -
Chapter 1: Introduction
ZAZ 0701 Finding Green Solutions for Nypro, Inc A Major Qualifying Project Submitted to the Faculty Of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science By ________________________ Emily Allietta ________________________ Catherine Maki Date: March 4, 2008 Approved: __________________________________ Professor Amy Zeng, Primary Advisor 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................ 2 Table of Figures .................................................................................................................. 4 Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. 6 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 7 2 Literature Review........................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Purchasing Strategies .............................................................................................. 10 2.2 Energy and Gas ....................................................................................................... 11 2.2.1 Gas Trends ...................................................................................................... -
RANGE GUIDE Johnlewis.Com Kitchen KBRG/08.18
Shop locations Autumn 2018 LONDON John Lewis Cribbs Causeway John Lewis Sheffield The Mall at Cribbs Causeway Barkers Pool John Lewis Bristol BS34 5QU Sheffield S1 1EP Oxford Street 0117 959 1100 0114 276 8511 London W1A 1EX 020 7629 7711 John Lewis High Wycombe John Lewis Solihull Holmers Farm Way Touchwood Peter Jones Cressex Solihull Sloane Square High Wycombe HP12 4NW West Midlands B91 3RA London SW1W 8EL 01494 462 666 0121 704 1121 020 7730 3434 John Lewis Leeds John Lewis Southampton John Lewis Brent Cross Victoria Gate West Quay Brent Cross Shopping Centre Harewood Street Southampton SO15 1QA London NW4 3FL Leeds S2 7AR 023 8021 6400 020 8202 6535 0113 394 6200 John Lewis Watford John Lewis Kingston John Lewis Leicester High Street Wood Street 2 Bath House Lane Watford WD17 2TW Kingston upon Thames Highcross Shopping Centre 01923 244 266 KT1 1TE Leicester LE1 4SA 020 8547 3000 0116 242 5777 John Lewis Welwyn Bridge Road John Lewis Stratford John Lewis Liverpool Welwyn Garden City 101 The Arcade 70 South John Street AL8 6TP Westfield Stratford City Liverpool One 01707 323 456 Montfichet Road Liverpool L1 8BJ London E20 1EL 0151 709 7070 John Lewis York 020 8532 3500 Unit C John Lewis Milton Keynes Vangarde Way John Lewis White City Central Milton Keynes York YO32 9AE Westfield London MK9 3EP 01904 557 950 Shopping Centre 01908 679 171 Ariel Way SCOTLAND London W12 7FU John Lewis Newcastle 020 8222 6400 Eldon Square John Lewis Aberdeen Newcastle upon Tyne George Street ENGLAND NE99 1AB Aberdeen AB25 1BW 0191 232 5000 01224 625 000 -
Extensions of Remarks. Hon. Donald M. Fraser
February 19, 1969 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 4031 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS. AID FOR BIAFRAN CHILDREN be known as the "Ravensbrueck Lapins" tions. On the basis of his first-hand obser was of a dual nature. One aspect was to bring vations, Mr. Cohen spoke of growing problems them to the United States for medical and confronting evacuation of children by air. HON. DONALD M. FRASER surgical care. The other aspect was to obtain He brought U3 together with Mr. G. A. On Oi' MINNESOTA from the German government at Bonn ade yegbula, Permanent Secretary of Biafra, who quate compensation that would enable them had just arrived in New York on a brief gov IN THE HOUSE OP REPRESENTATIVES to live Without continued and excessive hard ernment mission. Mr. Onyegbula spoke of the Tuesday, February 18, 1969 ship. Both these parts of the project were severity of Biafra's needs. Two thousand carried out. children and 4,000 adults were dying daily Mr. FRASER. Mr. Speaker, one of the The editors now invite the readers of SR of starvation. Food and medical supplies most remarkable humanitarian efforts to join them in a fourth project. It is called were being flown into Bia.fra In larger quan directed at relieving the misery of the ABc-Aid for Biafran Children. HereWith, tities than had been possible for some Nigerian-Biafran tragedy is known as some background. months. But the situation continued to be Aid for Biafran Children-ABC. Last September, when the food blockade of critical and was apt to remain that way Biafra was at its worst, and when thousands until there was a dramatic breakthrough in One of the principals in this effort is of children were dying from protein shortage, direct access. -
FSSAI to Notify Processing Aids to Bring Clarity to Food Processing
FSSAI to notify processing aids to bring clarity to food processing Friday, 27 July, 2018, 08 : 00 AM [IST] Ashwani Maindola, New Delhi FSSAI, the country’s apex food regulator, has decided to list and notify processing aids, in a bid to bring in more clarity with respect to processing of food. In this regard, an appendix is being added to the Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Amendment Regulations, 2018. FSSAI has issued a notice seeking comments on the subject. The draft notification consists of definitions of the different processing aids used by food manufacturers. “There are enzymes that speed up the process, while there are cooling agents that aid in rapidly freezing the products. Also present in the notification are the names of these processing substances (under different categories) that can be used by the manufacturers with their maximum residue levels (MRLs). To top it all, it also mentions food products, wherein these substances can be added,” said Ashwin Bhadri, chief executive officer, Equinox Labs. Processing aids are the minute substances that play an important role in bringing out the finished product in its best version. These are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and are used in a variety of foods, including meat and poultry, and are present in negligible amounts in the finished product. However, experts state that the existence of such processing aids in any finished product does not affect the appearance or taste, and most importantly, they have no major impact on public health, if consumed in acceptable daily intake (ADI). -
B REGULATION (EU) No 1169/2011 of the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT and of the COUNCIL of 25 October 2011 on the Provision of Food Info
2011R1169 — EN — 12.12.2011 — 000.001 — 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents ►B REGULATION (EU) No 1169/2011 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Directive 87/250/EEC, Council Directive 90/496/EEC, Commission Directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Directives 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 608/2004 (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 304, 22.11.2011, p. 18) Corrected by: ►C1 Corrigendum, OJ L 247, 13.9.2012, p. 17 (1169/2011) 2011R1169 — EN — 12.12.2011 — 000.001 — 2 ▼B REGULATION (EU) No 1169/2011 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Directive 87/250/EEC, Council Directive 90/496/EEC, Commission Directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Directives 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 608/2004 (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 114 thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission, Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee (1 ), Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure (2 ), Whereas: (1) Article 169 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) provides that the Union is to contribute to the attainment of a high level of consumer protection by the measures it adopts pursuant to Article 114 thereof.